Knee dynamics in the sagittal and frontal planes while performing landing and cutting tasks have been associated with non-contact ACL injury risk. Unfortunately, 3-D analysis is not feasible for the vast majority of athletes. Therefore, identifying tests that can be administered widely is desirable to identify those at greatest risk. Isokinetic strength measures and single leg hopping tasks have been utilized as markers of return to play post-injury and have also been suggested as potential predictors of initial injury. It is unclear, however, whether these tasks are valid indicators of knee dynamics during play. PURPOSE: To determine whether functional tests are related to knee dynamics during an unanticipated cutting maneuver. METHODS: Fourteen males and 16 females performed single leg hopping tasks (single (HOP), triple (T-HOP), and triple crossover (T-CROSS) hops for distance), isokinetic knee flexion (HAM) and extension (QUAD) (180deg/s), and cutting maneuvers (4.5-5.0 m/s). Three-dimensional kinematics and kinetics were recorded during the cutting task. Peak knee flexion angle (A-FLEX), peak abduction angle (A-ABD), and peak adduction moment (M-ADD) were extracted. A factor analysis was performed to determine groupings of variables. Three regression analyses were performed with A-FLEX, A-ABD, and M-ADD as dependent variables. RESULTS: Two principal components were extracted from the factor analysis. The hopping tasks and A-FLEX were strongly grouped with the first principle component (variance=57%). A-ABD and M-ADD were strongly associated with the second principle component (variance=19%). QUAD and HAM were moderately related to both components. The regression analyses revealed that A-FLEX was significantly predicted (R-square=.52) by the combination of T-HOP (stand. beta = −1.594) and T-CROSS (stand. beta = 1.041). CONCLUSIONS: Those with a longer T-HOP relative to T-CROSS exhibit greater knee flexion during cutting. These results suggest that performing T-HOP and T-CROSS may provide a reasonable predictor of sagittal plane dynamics and potentially injury risk. Unfortunately, frontal plane mechanics have been more strongly linked to injury, and the functional tests were not predictive of these variables. Supported by the UWM GSRC Award.
Read full abstract