Risk Of Hyperkalemia Research Articles

Effectiveness and safety of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists in heart failure patients with and without diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) have been shown to improve outcomes in various populations of heart failure (HF) patients. However, the impact of concomitant diseases, such as diabetes mellitus (DM), on these outcomes remains unclear. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of MRAs in heart failure patients with and without diabetes mellitus. A systematic search was conducted on PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases up to April 30, 2024. Data analysis was performed using a random-effects model to account for variability across studies, and statistical analysis was carried out using Review Manager 5.4. Efficacy and safety parameters were evaluated in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis guidelines. The meta-analysis included a total of 21,832 subjects from ten studies. The pooled results demonstrated that MRAs, compared to placebo, significantly reduced all-cause mortality in HF patients with and without DM (RR: 0.85; 95%CI 0.75-0.96; p = 0.009). A similar effect was observed in HF patients without DM (RR: 0.83; 95%CI 0.71-0.97; p = 0.02), while no significant effect was detected in the DM subgroup (RR: 0.87; 95%CI 0.69-1.11; p = 0.27). Both treatments had comparable effects on cardiovascular mortality in HF patients with and without DM (RR: 0.88; 95%CI 0.82-0.94; p = 0.0002), in HF patients with DM (RR: 0.90; 95%CI 0.81-1.01; p = 0.08), and in the non-DM subgroup (RR: 0.86; 95%CI 0.79-0.94; p = 0.0009). MRAs significantly reduced the risk of cardiovascular mortality in HF patients with and without DM (RR: 0.82; 95%CI 0.72-0.94; p = 0.005) and in HF patients with DM (RR: 0.79; 95%CI 0.63-0.98; p = 0.03), but no significant effect was observed in the non-DM subgroup (RR: 0.85; 95%CI 0.69-1.05; p = 0.13). Furthermore, compared to placebo, MRAs were associated with an increased risk of hyperkalemia (> 5.5 mEq/L) in HF patients with and without DM (RR: 1.63; 95%CI 1.18-2.24; p = 0.003), particularly in HF patients with DM (RR: 1.44; 95%CI 0.97-2.13; p = 0.07) and in the non-DM subgroup (RR: 1.87; 95%CI 1.34-2.61; p = 0.0002). MRAs are effective in reducing all-cause mortality, cardiovascular death, and cardiovascular mortality in heart failure patients. However, the use of MRAs is associated with an increased risk of hyperkalemia, necessitating careful monitoring, particularly in patients with diabetes mellitus.

The potential for improving cardio-renal outcomes in chronic kidney disease with the aldosterone synthase inhibitor vicadrostat (BI 690517): a rationale for the EASi-KIDNEY trial.

Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are at risk of progressive loss of kidney function, heart failure, and cardiovascular death despite current proven therapies, including renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASi), sodium glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), and statin-based regimens. RASi and SGLT2i reduce risk of CKD progression irrespective of primary cause of kidney disease, suggesting they target final common pathways. Targeting aldosterone overactivity with a nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) also reduces cardiorenal risk in patients with albuminuric diabetic kidney disease already treated with RASi. Together, these observations provide the rationale for trials to assess effects of inhibiting the aldosterone pathway in a broader range of patients with CKD, including those with non-diabetic causes of CKD or low albuminuria. Aldosterone synthase inhibitors (ASi) have emerged as an alternative to MRAs for aldosterone pathway inhibition. Phase II data from 586 patients with albuminuric CKD have shown that 10 mg of an ASi, vicadrostat (BI 690517), reduced urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio by ∼40% compared to placebo with or without concurrent empagliflozin treatment. MRA and ASi increase risk of hyperkalaemia. Combining their use with an SGLT2i may mitigate some of this risk, improving tolerability, and allowing a wider range of patients to be treated (including those with higher levels of blood potassium than in previous trials). The EASi-KIDNEY (NCT06531824) double-blind placebo-controlled trial will test this approach by assessing the safety and cardiorenal efficacy of vicadrostat in combination with empagliflozin in ∼11,000 patients with CKD. It will be sufficiently large to assess effects in patients with and without diabetes separately.

Finerenone: A Novel Drug Discovery for the Treatment of Chronic Kidney Disease.

The most common cause of chronic kidney disease (CKD) is diabetic nephropathy (DN). Primarilymineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) (spironolactone and eplerenone), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers were used for the treatment of CKD, but due to the high risk of hyperkalaemia, the combination was infrequently used. Currently after approval by FDA in 2021, finerenone was found to be effective in the treatment of CKD. Finerenone slowdowns the progression of diabetic nephropathy and lessens the cardiovascular morbidity in DN patients. The main objective of this review article is to provide a comprehensive and insightful overview of the role of finerenone by mainly focusing on its pharmacological properties, toxicity, uses, bioanalytical technique used for determination, and treatment options. Finerenone works by inhibiting the action of the mineralocorticoid receptor. Finerenone is quickly absorbed from the digestive tract after oral treatment and achieves peak plasma concentrations in 1-2 hours. Finerenone is actively metabolized through oxidation, epoxidation substitution, and direct hydroxylation. Elimination of finerenone is done through urine and feces. Determination of finerenone can be done through HPLC-MS and LSC. The present review covers the complete picture of ADME properties, bioanalytical techniques, clinical trials, toxicity, and possible avenues in this arena. Finerenone is effective compared to other mineralocorticoid receptor-like spironolactone and eplerenone, for the treatment of chronic kidney disease.

Risk of developing hyperkalemia in patients with hypertension treated with combination antihypertensive therapy - a retrospective register-based study.

The risk of hyperkalemia in relation to different combinations of antihypertensive therapy remains to be elucidated. In this Danish register-based study, we aimed to investigate the risk of developing hyperkalemia in relation to different combinations of antihypertensive therapy. Using incidence density matching, we matched a hyperkalemic patient to five normokalemic patients on eGFR groups, age, sex, and time between study entry and date of potassium measurement. Combination therapies were subdivided into eight groups: beta blockers (BB) + calcium channel blockers (CCB), BB + renin angiotensin system inhibitors (RASi), BB + RASi + mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA), CCB + RASi, CCB + RASi + thiazides, CCB + thiazides, RASi + thiazides, and other combinations. Multivariable conditional logistic regression was used to estimate the odds of hyperkalemia within 90 days for each of the eight antihypertensive combination therapies. A total of 793 patients with hyperkalemia were matched to 3598 normokalemic patients. In multivariable analysis, odds of developing hyperkalemia when being treated with BB + RASi + MRA was 1.95 (95% CI, 1.39-2.72) compared to RASi + thiazides (reference). CCB + thiazides (OR, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.45-1.28]) and CCB + RASi + Thiazid (OR 0.81 [95% CI, 0.51-1.28]) were among the others not significantly associated with hyperkalemia. Combinations of BB + RASi + MRA were significantly associated with an increased risk of developing hyperkalemia within 90 days of initiating treatment. Patients treated with BB + RASi + MRA within 90 days of treatment initiation, were associated with an increased hyperkalemia risk. When treating hypertensive patients with combination antihypertensive therapy, identifying and monitoring patients with a high risk of dyskalemias is a crucial goal to avoid serious adverse effects and detrimental outcomes related to dyskalemia.

A Delphi consensus project to capture experts' opinion on hyperkalaemia management across the cardiorenal spectrum.

The main purpose of this project was to capture experts' opinion on hyperkalaemia management and form best practice recommendations for cardiorenal patients in Greece. A steering committee of nephrologists and cardiologists developed 37 statements. An online questionnaire completed by 32 experts in cardiorenal management in Greece. Median score used to determine the level of agreement and disagreement index (DI) used to determine the level of consensus for each statement. Statements divided in four sectors: hyperkalaemia risk management, preventative measures, treatment and collaboration between specialties. The rate of the first round of the consensus was 94.6%. Median score was >7 for 36 of 37 statements and DI≤1 for 35 of 37. Among other statements, consensus reached for recognizing levels K+>5.0mEq/L as associated with elevated mortality risk; retaining renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors (RAASi) on maximum recommended dose for cardiorenal patients; and using novel K+ binders to help enabling guideline-recommended doses of RAASi therapy. Cardiologists compared to nephrologists showed higher reluctance to discontinue down-titrate RAASi and MRA in patients with K+ levels above 5mEq/L. Additionally, 88.9% of nephrologists and 71.4% of cardiologists agreed that cross-specialty alignment on a serum K+ concentration level (K>5.5mEq/L) is needed to initiate hyperkalaemia treatment. Both cardiologists and nephrologists showed disagreement with the statement on keeping titration in cardiorenal patients with K+>5.5mEq/L or preserving fruit and vegetable consumption when moderate or severe hyperkalaemia exhibits. This Delphi project pointed out nephrologists' and cardiologists' agreement on hyperkalaemia management in cardiorenal patients; thus, it can help a cross-specialty optimal management of cardiorenal patients, with hyperkalaemia not being an obstacle for disease-optimizing therapy. Novel potassium binding agents can enable guideline-recommended doses of potassium-sparing medication.

Optimizing aldosterone receptor antagonist therapy by sodium zirconium cyclosilicate in heart failure - OPRA-HF trial

Abstract Background Heart failure remains a significant health burden, characterized by disabling symptoms and mortality rates comparable to cancer. Mineralocorticoid antagonists (MRAs), pivotal in treating heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), are underutilized due to concerns of hyperkalemia. Sodium Zirconium Cyclosilicate (SZC) enables optimized MRA therapy by reducing hyperkalemia. However, prospective studies on the efficacy and safety of SZC in patients with HFrEF and high hyperkalemia risk are lacking, particularly in the context of contemporary heart failure quadruple-therapy including angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) and Sodium-Glucose Transport Protein 2 (SGLT2) Inhibitors. Purpose The OPRA-HF trial aims to assess the efficacy and safety of SZC in optimizing MRA treatment in symptomatic patients with HFrEF with risk for hyperkalemia on top of optimal guideline-directed medical therapy including ARNI and SGLT2 Inhibitors. Methods This investigator-initiated multicentred, randomized, placebo-controlled, and double-blinded trial include patients with HFrEF on suboptimal MRA treatment due to (1) history of hyperkalemia due to MRA, or (2) risk of hyperkalemia due to reduced renal function (eGFR 30-45 ml/min/m2) and current potassium 4.5-5-0 mmol/L. Patients undergo a Run-In phase with SZC, initiating or up-titrating MRA to target doses for 4-7 weeks and SZC was initiated in those patients that became hyperkalemic (K+>5 mEq/L. Those normokalemic and tolerating MRA ≥ 25 mg daily or at least 25 mg dose increase vs before run-in were randomized to SZC (5g or 10g) or placebo for 6 months. Study is powered to randomize 110 patients. Primary outcomes include maintaining daily MRA dose ≥ 25 mg or dose increase by 25 mg with normal potassium levels without rescue therapy. Secondary outcomes include evaluating the safety and tolerability of SZC as well as impact of SZC on quality of life. Results In this ongoing trial, so far 40 patients have been randomized. Of these, mean age was 74.3 years, 88.9% men. Most patients had ischemic etiology (54.2%), 36.1% had diabetes mellitus, 52.8% had hypertension.n. At screening 94.4% had beta-blockers, 35% ACEI/ARB, 60% ARNI and 72.2% had SGLT2 inhibitors, 33.3% had no MRAs and 35,6% of patients had less than 25 mg MRA daily,62,2% had 25 mg MRA daily, mean p-potassium was 4.7+0.4 mmol/L, and eGFR was 57.3 ml/min/1.73m². After run-in, 85.2% were on 50 mg MRA daily. A substantial number (51.2%) of eligible patients with previous hyperkalemia had Run-In failure as they now successfully tolerated target dose of MRA at 50 mg daily without recurrent hyperkalemia. SZC dosing was 5g once daily in 78.9% of patients. Conclusion This ongoing trial will provide evidence for the use of SZC to optimize MRA treatment in contemporary HFrEF patients. Preliminary findings suggest SZC effectively maintains normokalemia, enabling MRA optimization, potentially improving patients’ otcome.

Systolic plood pressure response to ASi BI 690517 with and without empagliflozin in CKD

Abstract Background and Aims: BI 690517 is a highly selective aldosterone synthase inhibitor (ASi) in clinical development for CKD treatment. Coadministration of BI 690517 with a sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor may provide additive efficacy and also mitigate risk of hyperkalaemia. This multinational, randomised, dose-finding, Phase II trial (NCT05182840) investigated the efficacy and safety of BI 690517, given alone or in combination with empagliflozin (EMPA), for albuminuria reduction in people with CKD and with or without type 2 diabetes.1 Here, we present a secondary analysis for effects on systolic blood pressure (SBP). Method Adults with CKD receiving a maximally tolerated dose of a renin-angiotensin system inhibitor were randomised (R1) 1:1 to receive background EMPA 10 mg or placebo (PBO-EMPA) during an 8-week run-in. They were then re-randomised (R2) 1:1:1:1 to receive BI 690517 (3 mg, 10 mg, or 20 mg) or PBO-ASI for 14 weeks, in addition to their assigned EMPA or PBO-EMPA therapy. Participants had mean baseline SBP ≥110 and ≤160 mmHg. Elevated blood pressure (BP) was defined as SBP ≥140 mmHg or DBP ≥90 mmHg and receiving ≥2 classes of anti-HTN medication. Changes in SBP from R2 baseline to Week 14 were analysed to assess BI 690517 effects with and without EMPA use. Results Of 714 people randomised at R1, 586 were randomised at R2, and the treated set consisted of 583 people. Demographics and clinical characteristics were similar between dose groups.1 At R2 baseline, 169 (29.0%) people had elevated BP. Mean SBP was 142.7 mmHg in the elevated BP group versus 129.2 mmHg in the non-elevated BP group. Treatment with BI 690517 consistently reduced SBP with reductions that were comparable in people with and without elevated BP (p-value for interaction not significant) (Table). Conclusions In people with CKD, BI 690517 reduced SBP in people with and without elevated BP.(Table)

Hyperkalemia and maintenance of renin-angiotensin system inhibitor therapy after initiating SGLT-2 or DPP-4 inhibitors.

Post-hoc analyses of clinical trials suggest that sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) lower the risk of hyperkalemia and facilitate the use of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASi) in people with type 2 diabetes. Whether this is also observed in routine care is unclear. We investigated whether SGLT-2i lowered the risk of hyperkalemia and RASi discontinuation as compared to dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors (DPP-4i). Using the target trial emulation framework, we studied adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) who started SGLT-2i or DPP-4i in Stockholm, Sweden (2014-2021). The outcomes were incident hyperkalaemia (potassium>5.0 mmol/L), mild hyperkalemia (potassium>5-≤5.5mmol/L) and moderate to severe hyperkalemia (potassium>5.5mmol/L). Among RASi users, we studied time to RASi discontinuation through evaluation of pharmacy fills. Cox regression with inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to estimate per-protocol hazard ratios (HRs). 29 849 individuals (15 326 SGLT-2i and 14 523 DPP-4i initiators) were included (mean age 66 years, 37% women). About one third of participants in each arm discontinued treatment within a year. Compared with DPP-4i, SGLT-2i use was associated with a lower rate of hyperkalemia (HR 0.77; 95% CI: 0.64-0.93), including both mild (0.76; 0.62-0.93) and moderate/severe (0.53; 0.40-0.69) hyperkalemia events. Of 19.116 participants that used RASi at baseline, 7% discontinued therapy. Initiation of SGLT-2i vs. DPP-4i was not associated with the rate of RASi discontinuation (0.97; 0.83-1.14). Results were consistent in intention-to-treat analyses and across strata of age, sex, cardiovascular comorbidity, and baseline kidney function. In patients with diabetes managed in routine clinical care, the use of SGLT-2i was associated with lower rates of hyperkalemia compared with DPP-4i. Possibly because of a relatively high rate of treatment discontinuations, this was not accompanied by higher persistence on RASi therapy.

Trauma Compendium: Management of the Entrapped Patient – a position statement and resource document of NAEMSP

ABSTRACT Entrapped patients may be simply entombed or experiencing crush injury or entanglement. Patients with trauma who are entrapped are at higher risk of significant injury than patients not entrapped. Limited access and prolonged scene times further complicate patient management. Although patient entrapment is a significant focus of specialty teams, such as urban search & rescue (US&R) teams that operate as local, regional, and/or national resources in response to complex scenes and disaster scenarios, entrapment is a regular occurrence in routine EMS response. Therefore, all EMS clinicians must have the training and skills to manage entrapped patients and to support medically-directed rescue throughout the extrication process. NAEMSP recommends: EMS clinicians must perform a timely and thorough primary and secondary assessment and reassessments in parallel with dynamic extrication planning; the environment may require adaption of standard assessment techniques and devices. EMS clinicians should establish early, clear, and ongoing communications with rescue personnel to ensure a coordinated patient-centered medically directed approach to extrication. Communication with the patient should be frequent, clear, and reassuring. EMS clinicians should immediately take measures to effectively prevent and manage hypothermia. EMS clinicians should recognize airway management in the entrapped patient is always challenging. When required, advanced airway placement should be performed by the most experienced operator with proficiency in multiple modalities and alternative techniques in limited access situations. In entrapped patients who are experiencing or are at risk for crush syndrome, EMS clinicians should initiate large-volume (i.e., 1-1.5 liters/hour for adults and 20 milliliters/kilogram/hour for pediatric patients for the initial 3-4 hours) fluid resuscitation with crystalloid, preferably normal saline, as early as possible and prior to extrication. In entrapped patients who are experiencing or are at risk for crush syndrome, EMS clinicians should administer medications to mitigate risks of hyperkalemia, infection, and renal failure, early and prior to extrication. Tourniquet application should be considered in the setting of the crushed extremity as a potential adjunct to medical optimization before extrication of some patients. Patients with prolonged entrapment with the potential for severe injuries require complex resuscitation and may benefit from EMS physician management on scene. EMS systems should consider an early EMS physician response to entrapped patients.

SGLT2 Inhibitors, Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 (GLP-1) Receptor Agonists, and the Risk of Hypokalemia and Hyperkalemia in a National Cohort of Veterans with Type 2 Diabetes

SGLT2 Inhibitors, Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 (GLP-1) Receptor Agonists, and the Risk of Hypokalemia and Hyperkalemia in a National Cohort of Veterans with Type 2 Diabetes

Intensive Home Blood Pressure Lowering in Patients with Advanced CKD

Optimal blood pressure (BP) targets in advanced CKD are controversial. More intensive BP lowering in the setting of advanced CKD is thought to be associated with risk of acute kidney injury, hyperkalemia, and ESKD. We aimed to conduct a pilot trial of intensive BP control to determine if lower SBP targets can be safely achieved for patients with CKD through titration of BP medications using in-home measured BP. Non-blinded randomized controlled trial. 108 patients with advanced CKD (eGFR ≤30 mL/min/1.73 m2) and hypertension. Participants were randomized either to a target home SBP goal of <120 mmHg (N=66) or a less intensive SBP goal (N=42). Antihypertensive medications were titrated to achieve the target home SBP range in the first 4 months of the study and maintained until the end of the study. Home BP was measured using a wireless Bluetooth-enabled monitor that transmitted readings to providers in real-time. The primary efficacy outcome was the difference in achieved clinic SBP between the two study arms from months 4-12. Safety outcomes included hyperkalemia, a composite outcome of falls or syncope, and onset of need for dialysis or kidney transplantation. The mean clinic SBP at month 12 was 124.7 mmHg in the intensive SBP group vs. 138.2 mmHg in the less intensive SBP group. Averaged over months 4-12, the achieved mean clinic SBP in the intensive SBP arm was 11.7 mmHg (95% CI 7.5 to 16 mmHg, p<0.001) lower than the mean SBP achieved in the less intensive SBP arm. Primary safety outcomes were not statistically significantly different between the two arms (all p>0.05). Small sample size which may limit our ability to detect clinically significant differences in rates of adverse outcomes; single-center design. A clinic SBP goal of <120 mmHg is feasible to achieve with the help of real-time home BP monitoring and appears to be safe in this study population with advanced CKD. Larger trials to determine optimal BP targets in advanced CKD and the risks and benefits associated with more intensive BP control are warranted.

Baxdrostat and finerenone: new aldosterone synthase-aldosterone-mineralocorticoid receptor hormonal system inhibitors for the drug treatment of resistant arterial hypertension

Resistant arterial hypertension is characterized by failure to control target blood pressure despite long-term use of optimal or maximum tolerated doses of three different antihypertensive drugs, including diuretic. Patients with resistant hypertension are included in a group of people at high risk of cardiovascular and renal complications, including accelerated progression of chronic kidney disease with a more rapid transition to the final stage of the disease. Resistant hypertension is based on a salt-sensitive, volume-dependent form of hypertension, which usually occurs against the background of increased aldosterone production and normal or even decreased renin plasma activity. A key role in its formation is played by an increase of sodium reabsorption in the kidneys, associated with excessive activity of aldosterone-sensitive epithelial sodium channels (ENaC), which control the reabsorption of this ion in the distal segments of the nephron. Its assumed that in this pathological process, in addition to aldosterone, is also involved the small Rho GTFase Rac1 — regulatory G-protein, which can enter into a direct ligand-independent interaction with mineralcorticoid receptors, performing the function of a powerful nonsteroidal activator of the transmission of their intracellular signals. Based on controlled, randomized clinical trials, the optimal fourth drug to overcome resistance in such patients is the steroid mineralcorticoid receptor antagonist spironolactone. However, the inclusion of this drug in antihypertensive therapy not only fails to control blood pressure in a significant proportion of patients with resistant hypertension, but also significantly increases the risk of hyperkalemia, especially in people with impaired renal function. The review presents data on the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of new inhibitors of aldosterone synthase-aldosterone-mineralocorticoid receptor hormonal system baxdrostat and finerenone, as well as the results of clinical studies assessing the clinical effectiveness and safety profile of these drugs in patients with resistant hypertension.

Efficacy and safety of angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibition in heart failure patients with end-stage kidney disease on maintenance dialysis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) has played an increasingly important role in the management of heart failure (HF). However, the evidence on the benefits of ARNI in HF patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) undergoing dialysis is limited. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of ARNI in patients with concomitant HF and ESKD on maintenance dialysis. We systematically searched the MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases for studies reporting outcomes after ARNI treatment in HF patients with ESKD on dialysis. All meta-analyses were performed using the random effects model. Twenty-six studies comprising 2494 patients with concomitant HF and ESKD undergoing dialysis were included. Our synthesis showed a significant improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) between before and after ARNI treatment (mean change: 8.05%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 5.57-10.54). Compared to the conventional group, the ARNI group showed a greater improvement in LVEF (mean difference: 4.03%; 95% CI 2.90-5.16). This effect was more pronounced in patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (pinteraction < 0.0001). Patients treated with ARNI had a lower risk of all-cause mortality (risk ratio [RR] 0.64; 95% CI 0.45-0.92; p = 0.01) but had a similar rate of HF hospitalization (RR 0.71; 95% CI 0.43-1.18; p = 0.19). ARNI treatment showed benefits in the improvement of left ventricular end-systolic diameter, left ventricular mass index, left atrial diameter, and E/e' ratio (p < 0.05), while it did not significantly increase the risk of severe hyperkalaemia (p = 0.33) or symptomatic hypotension (p = 0.53). This meta-analysis provided insights into the benefits of ARNI in HF patients with ESKD undergoing dialysis by improving left ventricular function, reversing left ventricular remodelling, and reducing the risk of all-cause mortality, without increasing the risk of HF hospitalizations, severe hyperkalaemia, and symptomatic hypotension.

Hyperkalemia burden and treatment patterns in Chinese patients on hemodialysis: final analysis of a prospective multicenter cohort study (PRECEDE-K)

Objectives Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) on hemodialysis (HD) are at risk for hyperkalemia (HK), associated with cardiac arrhythmia and sudden death. Data on the burden of HK and management techniques among HD patients in China are still scarce. This study assessed the treatment modalities, recurrence, and prevalence of HK in Chinese HD patients. Methods In this prospective cohort study conducted from May 2021 to July 2022, patients aged ≥18 years who had ESRD and were on HD were enrolled from 15 centers in China (up to 6 months). Results Overall, 600 patients were enrolled. At the baseline visit, mean (± standard deviation) urea reduction ratio was 68.0% ± 9.70 and Kt/V was 1.45 ± 0.496. Over 6 months, 453 (75.5%) patients experienced HK, of whom 356 (78.6%) recurred. Within 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 months, 203 (44.8%), 262 (57.8%), 300 (66.2%), 326 (72.0%), 347 (76.6%), and 356 (78.6%) patients had at least one HK recurrence event, respectively. The proportions of patients with ≥1, 2, 3, 4, 5, or 6 HK recurrence events were 356 (78.6%), 306 (67.5%), 250 (55.2%), 208 (45.9%), 161 (35.5%), and 110 (24.3%), respectively. Among the 453 patients who experienced HK, only 24 (5.3%) were treated with potassium binders: seven (1.5%) with sodium polystyrene sulfonate, 13 (2.9%) with calcium polystyrene sulfonate, and six (1.3%) with sodium zirconium cyclosilicate. Conclusion Since HK is a chronic illness, long-term care is necessary. Patients on HD should have effective potassium management on non-dialysis days, yet our real-world population rarely used potassium binders. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT04799067

Effectiveness and safety of finerenone in diabetic kidney disease patients: a real-world observational study from China

Aims Finerenone has been approved for treating diabetic kidney disease (DKD) with reducing cardiorenal risk. Real-world data on finerenone treatment for the management of DKD are presently lacking. This study aimed to investigate the effect of finerenone on the renal parameters of the Chinese DKD population in the real-world medical setting for the first time, especially in combination with renin–angiotensin system inhibitors (RASi) and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i). Methods Forty-two DKD patients were selected and completed a 6-month finerenone treatment. Renal parameters and adverse effects were collected at every visit. Results The median urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) was 1426.11 (755.42, 3638.23) mg/g. Among them, the proportion of patients with a UACR of 300–5000 mg/g was 76.2%, and the proportion of patients with a UACR of >5000 mg/g was 14.3%. The median estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was 54.50 (34.16, 81.73) mL/min/1.73 m2. Finerenone decreased the UACR significantly throughout the study period (p < .05). The maximal decline of UACR at month 6 was 73%. Moreover, the proportion of patients with a 30% or greater reduction in UACR was 68.42% in month 6. There was a smaller decline (9–11%) in the eGFR after initiating finerenone (p > .05). One patient each discontinued finerenone due to hyperkalemia (2.4%) and acute kidney injury (2.4%). No patient reported hypotension, breast pain, and gynecomastia. Conclusions This study from China first demonstrated finerenone decreased UACR with manageable safety in real-world DKD treatment. A triple regimen of RASi, SGLT2i, and finerenone may be a promising treatment strategy for lowering albuminuria and reducing hyperkalemia risk in advanced DKD patients.

Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists in heart failure: an individual patient level meta-analysis

Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) reduce hospitalisations and death in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), but the benefit in patients with heart failure and mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF) or heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is unclear. We evaluated the effect of MRAs in four trials that enrolled patients with heart failure across the range of ejection fraction. This is a prespecified, individual patient level meta-analysis of the RALES (spironolactone) and EMPHASIS-HF (eplerenone) trials, which enrolled patients with HFrEF, and of the TOPCAT (spironolactone) and FINEARTS-HF (finerenone) trials, which enrolled patients with HFmrEF or HFpEF. The primary outcome of this meta-analysis was a composite of time to first hospitalisation for heart failure or cardiovascular death. We also estimated the effect of MRAs on components of this composite, total (first or repeat) heart failure hospitalisations (with and without cardiovascular deaths), and all-cause death. Safety outcomes were also assessed, including serum creatinine, estimated glomerular filtration rate, serum potassium, and systolic blood pressure. An interaction between trials and treatment was tested to examine the heterogeneity of effect in these populations. This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42024541487. 13 846 patients were included in the four trials. MRAs reduced the risk of cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalisation (hazard ratio 0·77 [95% CI 0·72-0·83]). There was a statistically significant interaction by trials and treatment (p for interaction=0·0012) due to the greater efficacy in HFrEF (0·66 [0·59-0·73]) compared with HFmrEF or HFpEF (0·87 [0·79-0·95]). We observed significant reductions in heart failure hospitalisation in the HFrEF trials (0·63 [0·55-0·72]) and the HFmrEF or HFpEF trials (0·82 [0·74-0·91]). The same pattern was observed for total heart failure hospitalisations with or without cardiovascular death. Cardiovascular death was reduced in the HFrEF trials (0·72 [0·63-0·82]) but not in the HFmrEF or HFpEF trials (0·92 [0·80-1·05]). All-cause death was also reduced in the HFrEF trials (0·73 [0·65-0·83]) but not in the HFmrEF or HFpEF trials (0·94 [0·85-1·03]). With an MRA, the risk of hyperkalaemia was doubled compared with placebo (odds ratio 2·27 [95% CI 2·02-2·56]), but the incidence of serious hyperkalaemia (serum potassium >6·0 mmol/L) was low (2·9% vs 1·4%); the risk of hypokalaemia (potassium <3·5 mmol/L) was halved (0·51 [0·45-0·57]; 7% vs 14%). Steroidal MRAs reduce the risk of cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalisation in patients with HFrEF and non-steroidal MRAs reduce this risk in patients with HFmrEF or HFpEF. None.

Finerenone in Heart Failure with Mildly Reduced or Preserved Ejection Fraction

BackgroundSteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists reduce morbidity and mortality among patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction, but their efficacy in those with heart failure and mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction has not been established. Data regarding the efficacy and safety of the nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist finerenone in patients with heart failure and mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction are needed.MethodsIn this international, double-blind trial, we randomly assigned patients with heart failure and a left ventricular ejection fraction of 40% or greater, in a 1:1 ratio, to receive finerenone (at a maximum dose of 20 mg or 40 mg once daily) or matching placebo, in addition to usual therapy. The primary outcome was a composite of total worsening heart failure events (with an event defined as a first or recurrent unplanned hospitalization or urgent visit for heart failure) and death from cardiovascular causes. The components of the primary outcome and safety were also assessed.ResultsOver a median follow-up of 32 months, 1083 primary-outcome events occurred in 624 of 3003 patients in the finerenone group, and 1283 primary-outcome events occurred in 719 of 2998 patients in the placebo group (rate ratio, 0.84; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.74 to 0.95; P=0.007). The total number of worsening heart failure events was 842 in the finerenone group and 1024 in the placebo group (rate ratio, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.71 to 0.94; P=0.006). The percentage of patients who died from cardiovascular causes was 8.1% and 8.7%, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.78 to 1.11). Finerenone was associated with an increased risk of hyperkalemia and a reduced risk of hypokalemia.ConclusionsIn patients with heart failure and mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction, finerenone resulted in a significantly lower rate of a composite of total worsening heart failure events and death from cardiovascular causes than placebo. (Funded by Bayer; FINEARTS-HF ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04435626.)

Cardiovascular and Renal Treatment in Heart Failure Patients With Hyperkalemia or High Risk of Hyperkalemia: Rationale and Design of the CARE-HK in HF Registry

Despite guideline recommendations, many patients with heart failure (HF) do not receive target dosages of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors (RAASis) in clinical practice due, in part, to concerns about hyperkalemia (HK). This noninterventional, multinational, multicenter registry (NCT04864795; 111 sites in Europe and the USA) enrolled 2558 eligible adults with chronic HF (mostly with reduced ejection fraction [HFrEF]). Eligibility criteria included use of angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin-II receptor blocker/angiotensin-receptor-neprilysin inhibitor, being a candidate for or treatment with a mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, and increased risk of HK (eg, current serum potassium > 5.0 mmol/L), history of HK in the previous 24 months, or estimated glomerular filtration rate < 45 mL/min/1.73 m2). Information on RAASi and other guideline-recommended therapies was collected retrospectively and prospectively (≥ 6 months). Patients were followed according to local clinical practice, without study-specific visits or interventions. The main objectives were to characterize RAASi treatment patterns compared with guideline recommendations, describe RAASi modifications following episodes of HK, and describe RAASi treatment in patients treated with patiromer. Baseline characteristics for the first 1000 patients are presented. CARE-HK is a multinational prospective HF registry designed to report on the management and outcomes of patients with HF at high risk for HK in routine clinical practice.

Finerenone's Impact on Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Chronic Kidney Disease and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review.

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) impacts about 10% of adults globally and substantially elevates the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), such as heart attacks, strokes, cardiovascular-related deaths, and hospital admissions due to heart failure. The interplay between CKD and cardiovascular disease (CVD) leads to poor health outcomes. Nevertheless, there is a scarcity of systematic reviews focusing on the effectiveness of finerenone, a new non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA), in lowering these risks. In this systematic review, we aim to evaluate the impact of finerenone on reducing MACEin individuals with CKDand type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). CKD pathophysiology involves hyperglycemia, hypertension, and dyslipidemia, leading to glomerular hyperfiltration, inflammation, and fibrosis. Traditional treatments, including angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi), angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs), and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), often fall short in preventing cardiovascular events. Steroidal MRAs like spironolactone and eplerenone, while effective in reducing proteinuria, are limited by hyperkalemia risks. Finerenone offers a more selective mechanism, reducing sodium retention, inflammation, and fibrosis, with a lower risk of hyperkalemia. We searched five electronic databases comprehensively, identifying studies consistently demonstrating that finerenone significantly reduces MACE and improves renal outcomes by reducing albuminuria and slowing the fall in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). However, limitations include study heterogeneity, short follow-up periods, and potential publication bias. In conclusion, finerenone shows promise as a therapeutic option for CKD and T2DM, reducing MACE and improving renal outcomes. Further research is needed to understand its long-term benefits and safety across diverse populations.

Hyperkalemia Management with Intravenous Insulin in Patients with Reduced Kidney Function.

Background: Insufficient kidney function increases the risk of hyperkalemia and hypoglycemia, particularly in hemodialysis-dependent patients. Hypoglycemia is a common complication of insulin-based hyperkalemia treatment. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of hyperkalemia treatment in hemodialysis-dependent and -non-dependent patients and identify risk factors associated with hypoglycemia. Methods: A retrospective observational cohort study was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of hyperkalemia treatment including patients with reduced kidney function and hyperkalemia treated with intravenous insulin. The decline rate of potassium and glucose levels were compared between hemodialysis-dependent and non-dependent patients. In addition, univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify risk factors associated with hypoglycemia. Results: A total of 172 patients with hyperkalemia and reduced kidney function were included. The steepest reduction of serum potassium levels happened within the first 6 h after insulin administration, at 1.1 and 0.9 mmol/L for hemodialysis-dependent and non-dependent patients, respectively. The incidence of hypoglycemia was 18%, and no significant difference was found between cohorts. Hemodialysis-dependent patients were more likely to be readmitted within one month with hyperkalemia, while all-cause ICU admission was more likely for non-dependent patients. Older patients, and those who had heart failure or received a second dose of insulin to treat hyperkalemia, were more likely to experience hypoglycemia. Conclusions: Monitoring blood glucose levels following insulin administration is essential given the complexity of patients' factors associated with hypoglycemia resulting from hyperkalemia treatment in patients with insufficient kidney function.