Risk Factors For Proliferative Vitreoretinopathy Research Articles

Risk of Proliferative Vitreoretinopathy in the Second Eye in Adult Patients with Bilateral Retinal Detachment

To examine the incidence and risk factors of proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) in the patients who develop rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) in their fellow eye after having a prior RRD complicated by PVR. Multicenter, retrospective observational study. Eyes with retinal detachment and PVR between 2015 and 2023 were identified through the Vestrum Health Database METHODS: Risk factors for PVR development, specifically documented PVR in the fellow eye, gender, age, lens status, and presenting and final visual acuity, were evaluated. Odds ratio for PVR development during 6 months post-operative period. Of 57,264 patients, 11% had PVR in at least one eye. Of the 50,989 patients who did not develop PVR after the initial RRD, 4,834 developed RRD in the fellow eye. 166 of these patients developed PVR in their second eye for a PVR rate of 3% in the fellow eye. Of the 6,275 patients who developed PVR after primary RRD repair, 406 of these patients went on to develop RRD in their fellow eye. 42 of these patients developed PVR in their second eye for a PVR rate of 10%. A regression model that also included age, gender and visual acuity led to an odds ratio of 3.42 (p<0.001). The odds ratio of PVR development generally decreased with age. Pseudophakic patients had a higher odds ratio for PVR development, 1.48 (p=0.017). Initial patients with VA 20/40-20/80 had an odds ratio of 2.15 (p=0.003). Patients with VA worse than 20/200 had an odds ratio of 2.89 for PVR development (p<0.001). Patients with a history RRD with PVR in one eye, have approximately 3.5 times higher rate of PVR in their second eye after RRD compared with patients without a history of PVR. This finding potential impacts surgical decisions and use of prophylactic anti-PVR therapy if the patient's second eye has RRD. The final visual acuity in second eye of patients with history PVR is better than for the second eye of patients with no history of PVR which may indicate surgeons are already taking steps to prevent PVR in the patient's second eye.

Risk factors for proliferative vitreoretinopathy after retinal detachment surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

To comprehensively investigate risk factors for proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) after retinal detachment (RD) surgery. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were systematically searched until May 22, 2023. Risk factors included demographic and disease-related risk factors. Odds ratios (ORs) and weighted mean differences (WMDs) were used as the effect sizes, and shown with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Sensitivity analysis was conducted. The protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022378652). Twenty-two studies of 13,875 subjects were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. Increased age was associated with a higher risk of postoperative PVR (pooled WMD = 3.98, 95%CI: 0.21, 7.75, P = 0.038). Smokers had a higher risk of postoperative PVR than non-smokers (pooled OR = 5.07, 95%CI: 2.21-11.61, P<0.001). Presence of preoperative PVR was associated with a greater risk of postoperative PVR (pooled OR = 22.28, 95%CI: 2.54, 195.31, P = 0.005). Presence of vitreous hemorrhage was associated with a greater risk of postoperative PVR (pooled OR = 4.12, 95%CI: 1.62, 10.50, P = 0.003). Individuals with aphakia or pseudophakia had an increased risk of postoperative PVR in contrast to those without (pooled OR = 1.41, 95%CI: 1.02, 1.95, P = 0.040). The risk of postoperative PVR was higher among patients with macula off versus those with macula on (pooled OR = 1.85, 95%CI: 1.24, 2.74, P = 0.002). Extent of RD in patients with postoperative PVR was larger than that in patients without (pooled WMD = 0.31, 95%CI: 0.02, 0.59, P = 0.036). Patients with postoperative PVR had longer duration of RD symptoms than those without (pooled WMD = 10.36, 95%CI: 2.29, 18.43, P = 0.012). Age, smoking, preoperative PVR, vitreous hemorrhage, aphakia or pseudophakia, macula off, extent of RD, and duration of RD symptoms were risk factors for postoperative PVR in patients undergoing RD surgery, which may help better identify high-risk patients, and provide timely interventions.

Proliferative Vitreoretinopathy: A Reappraisal.

Proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) remains the main cause of failure after retinal detachment (RD) surgery. Despite the development of modern technologies and sophisticated techniques for the management of RD, the growth of fibrocellular membranes within the vitreous cavity and on both sides of the retinal surface, as well as intraretinal fibrosis, can compromise surgical outcomes. Since 1983, when the term PVR was coined by the Retina Society, a lot of knowledge has been obtained about the physiopathology and risk factors of PVR, but, despite the proposal of a lot of therapeutic challenges, surgical skills seem to be the only effective way to manage PVR complications.

Comparison of outcomes: scleral buckling and pars plana vitrectomy versus vitrectomy alone for primary repair of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.

ObjectiveTo assess the combination of scleral buckling (SB) and pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) versus PPV alone in the primary repair of rhegmatogenous retinal detachments (RRDs).MethodsThe current study was a retrospective, comparative, interventional, consecutive case series of 179 eyes of 174 patients who underwent primary RRD repair by five surgeons between January 1, 2008 and December 31, 2010, utilizing SB with PPV or PPV. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to compare the efficacy of the two surgical strategies and assess for risk factors of proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR).ResultsSingle surgery anatomic success (SSAS) was similar (P=0.76) between the PPV group (112 of 132 eyes, 85%) and SB with PPV group (39 of 47 eyes, 83%). Final anatomic success was 100% in each group. There was no difference in rates of PVR formation (PPV 16% vs SB with PPV 19%, P=0.70). Final logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution acuity was 0.33 (20/43) in the PPV group and 0.37 (20/47) in the SB with PPV group (P=0.62). Postoperative anterior chamber fibrin was highly correlated with PVR formation (PVR 13% vs no PVR 0.7%, P=0.003; odds ratio =68.37, P=0.007). Separate analysis of medium- to high-complexity cases showed similar SSAS (PPV 86% vs SB with PPV 83%, P=0.45).ConclusionSB with PPV versus PPV alone were similarly efficacious for repair of primary RRDs of varying complexity. SSAS rates, PVR incidence, and final visual acuities were not significantly different.

Retinal Detachment and Proliferative Vitreoretinopathy.

In normal eyes, retinal detachment (RD) occurs at a rate of approximately 5 per 100,000 people per year and the frequency of proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) remains largely unchanged in primary RD, with the incidence ranging from 5.1 to 11.7%. PVR is the most common cause of failed repair of rhegmatogenous RD, and risk factors for PVR are related to several well-known pre-, intra-, and postoperative clinical situations. Current methods of surgical management of RD and PVR are pneumatic retinopexy, scleral buckling, and pars plana vitrectomy (PPV). Surgical success rates for PVR have improved as techniques and instruments of vitrectomy evolved. However, despite these advances, more than one fourth of initially successful cases results in redetachment due to recurrent vitreoretinal traction. Retinal pigment epithelial cells are the key factor in triggering PVR development. In addition, soluble mediators and the extracellular matrix components play a critical role in cellular events, including proliferation and tissue contraction which occur in PVR. Although PPV remains a critical component of the treatment in RD and PVR, ongoing efforts seek to identify adjuvant therapies that might inhibit PVR development. Recent studies have therefore been directed toward pharmacologic inhibition of cellular proliferation and membrane contraction with drugs such as daunorubicin, 5-fluorouracil, and heparin. More detailed understanding of the pathophysiology underlying PVR may lead to the development of effective prophylactic and/or adjunctive therapies. Further work is necessary to identify optimal adjunctive therapies for the management of RD and PVR.

Interaction Between Surgical Procedure for Repairing Retinal Detachment and Clinical Risk Factors for Proliferative Vitreoretinopathy

Purpose: To asses risk factors of proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) and a model for predicting it. Methods: Observational, case-control. 335 patients with non-complicated retinal detachment (RD) were included: 134 developed PVR (Cases); 201 patients did not (Controls). Risk factors for PVR were identified by multivariate analysis. Influence of variables was assayed according to the surgical approach. By logistic regression analysis a model to predict the risk of developing PVR and odds ratio (OR) values for each clinical factor were estimated. Results: Risk was higher in patients > 70 years and with intraocular pressure lower than 14 (OR: 3.84; CI 95%: 2.04–7.30) and in retinal breaks larger than “1 clock hour” (OR: 2.54; CI: 1.28–5.05), extended retinal detachments (OR: 4.01; CI: 1.98–8.10) and reinterventions (OR: 1.55; CI: 1.14–9.22). Scleral surgery also was a risk factor (OR: 3.89; CI: 2.12–7.14) and aphakia/pseudophakia when scleral surgery is performed (OR: 3.33; CI: 1.54–7.22). A model to predict PVR was proposed with these results. Conclusions: Surgical approach modifies risk factors of PVR, and should be taken into account to improve the models for predicting it.

Prevalence and risk factors for proliferative vitreoretinopathy in eyes with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment but no previous vitreoretinal surgery

PurposeTo determine the prevalence of and risk factors for proliferatative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) in eyes with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment but no previous vitreoretinal surgery. DesignObservational case series. MethodsProspective study. SettingA private vitreoretinal clinic in Caracas, Venezuela. Study population119 eyes of 119 patients who presented with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment but no previous vitreoretinal surgery between 1995 and 1998. Observation proceduresData from detailed preoperative and postoperative examinations of each eye were recorded prospectively and entered into an electronic database. Main outcome measuresPrevalence of PVR of any type and severe PVR, preoperative risk factors for PVR of any type and severe PVR, effect of PVR and retinal detachment duration on initial and final visual acuity, and surgical complexity. ResultsThe prevalence of PVR of any type was 52.9% and of severe PVR was 26.9%. The mean retinal detachment duration (±SD) was 58.4 (±129.1) days, and the mean time from initial examination to surgical treatment (±SD) was 24.3 (81.2) days. By univariable analysis, long retinal detachment duration, poor initial visual acuity, and large retinal detachment extent were significantly associated with PVR prevalence and severity. The presence of vitreous hemorrhage was significantly associated with PVR prevalence, and cataract was significantly associated with PVR severity. By multivariable analysis, long retinal detachment duration and large retinal detachment extent were simultaneous risk factors for PVR prevalence, while long retinal detachment, large retinal detachment extent, and poor initial visual acuity were simultaneous risk factors for PVR severity. Eyes with longer retinal detachment duration, PVR of any type, and severe PVR had worse initial and final visual acuities than eyes with shorter retinal detachment duration or those without PVR, respectively. Eyes with PVR had more complex surgery than those without PVR. ConclusionsPVR occurred very frequently in this population and was associated with more complex surgery and worse visual outcomes than among eyes without PVR. We have identified preventable risk factors associated with PVR that suggest a specific and significant need for better access to ophthalmologic care and patient education in this group of patients.

Risk factors for proliferative vitreoretinopathy after primary vitrectomy: a prospective study

AIMTo assess clinical variables and vitreous protein as risk factors for the development of postoperative proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR).METHODSA prospective study was conducted on 140 patients with a rhegmatogenous retinal detachment...

Vitreous levels of intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1) as a risk indicator of proliferative vitreoretinopathy

AIMTo investigate whether high vitreous levels of the soluble intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (sICAM-1) may be related to clinical risk factors of proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) and whether their measurement may...

Risk factors for proliferative vitreoretinopathy.

Proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) is one of the major causes of failure in retinal detachment surgery. To prevent PVR, it is necessary to determine factors predisposing its development. In primary PVR, large retinal tears, long duration of retinal detachment, vitreous hemorrhages, aphakia and choroidal detachment were demonstrated as clinical risk factors for PVR. In postoperative PVR, it was revealed that large breaks, pre- and postoperative choroidal detachment, minor intra- or postoperative hemorrhages, signs of uveitis, extensive retinal detachment, vitrectomy, cryopexy, air injection and preoperative PVR were risk factors for PVR by multivariate analysis. Almost all risk factors for PVR are associated with intravitreal dispersion of retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) cells or breakdown of the blood-ocular barrier which are prerequisite to development of PVR.

Risk factors for proliferative vitreoretinopathy.

Despite the recent progress in vitreous surgery, treatment of proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) is still difficult. Even if the reattachment of the retina is successful, visual prognosis is often unsatisfactory. Identification of clinical risk factors for PVR provides useful guidelines for planning the management of rhegmatogeneous retinal detachment. This review summarized the current concept for pathogenesis, clinical risk factors, and medical treatment for PVR. The presence of retinal breaks and the breakdown of the blood-retinal barrier are prerequisite to development of PVR. Almost all risk factors for PVR are associated with intravitreal dispersion of retinal pigment epithelial cells or the breakdown of the blood-retinal barrier.

COMPARATIVE STUDY OF CLINICAL FACTORS THAT PREDISPOSE PATIENTS TO PROLIFERATIVE VITREORETINOPATHY IN APHAKIA

To clarify the risk factors of proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) in aphakia, the clinical features of 25 aphakic eyes with PVR were statistically analyzed and compared with a control group of 157 aphakic eyes with non-PVR rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. The statistically significant (P less than 0.05) factors that predisposed patients to PVR in aphakia were as follows: a history of vitreous loss on cataract surgery, retinal detachment developing within 3 months after cataract extraction, duration of retinal detachment longer than 3 months, break larger than three disc diameters, and choroidal detachment. Vitreous loss is believed to play the most important role in the development of PVR in aphakia.

Clinical risk factors for proliferative vitreoretinopathy.

We reviewed the records of all patients with rhegmatogenous retinal detachments examined and treated by a single surgeon (B.P.C.) at the University of Virginia, Charlottesville, between 1978 and 1984. Of the 607 eyes that satisfied the selection criteria, a preliminary chart review of outcomes found that 65 (10.7%) had proliferative vitreoretinopathy and 34 had macular puckers. From the remaining 508 eyes, 325 controls were randomly selected to match each case from within a time window. Thirty-six (55.4%) of the 65 patients with proliferative vitreoretinopathy had had unequivocal reattachment after a single procedure before the onset of proliferative vitreoretinopathy, and the only clearly identified technical difficulty that was significantly more common in the patients with proliferative vitreoretinopathy was the inability to identify a retinal break. Several other features of the rhegmatogenous retinal detachments that correlated with the development of postoperative proliferative vitreoretinopathy were identified, and stepwise discriminant analysis was used to ascertain which of these were more important. The strongest predictor was use of vitrectomy in management of the detachment. Following this in order of importance were the presence of preoperative proliferative vitreoretinopathy, preoperative choroidal detachment, and the amount of cryopexy required. Vitrectomy remained a strong predictor even when considered after adjustment for all other characteristics. These data suggest that proliferative vitreoretinopathy is not simply an iatrogenic disease, but it is more likely to occur in association with certain detachment features that either by themselves or through their management require prolongation of the retinal wound healing process.