Risk Factors For New Infections Research Articles

Natural history of shedding and household transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 using intensive high-resolution sampling.

The COVID-19 pandemic has led to 775 million documented cases and over 7 million deaths worldwide as of March 2024 and is an ongoing health crisis. To limit viral spread within households and in the community, public health officials have recommended self-isolation, self-quarantine of exposed household contacts, and mask use. Yet, risk of household transmission (HHT) may be underestimated due to low frequency of sampling, and risk factors for HHT are not well understood. To estimate the secondary attack rate of SARS-CoV-2 within households and to define the risk factors for new infections in household members who are in close contact with the index case. In this prospective cohort study, from March 2020-December 2021 we enrolled 60 households with index cases who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. All household contacts and index cases were tested daily for SARS-CoV-2 via reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) using self-collected anterior nares specimens. Households were followed until all study participants in the household tested negative for SARS-CoV-2 for seven consecutive days. We collected sex, age, race/ethnicity, comorbidities, and relationship to index case for secondary contacts, household level characteristics including primary income, household density, and square feet per person on property. We compared the sociodemographic variables between COVID-19 positive and negative household members and between households where secondary transmission did and did not occur. Daily anterior nares swabs were tested for SARS-CoV-2 using RT-PCR, in order to assess duration of nasal shedding of SARS-CoV-2, as well as risk of transmission to secondary household contacts. Of the 163 participants in this study, 84 (51.5%) were women; median age (IQR) was 36.0 (17.0-54.0) years of age; 78 (47.8%) were white and 48 (29.5%) were Hispanic/LatinX. Of the fifty households with household contacts, at least one secondary case occurred in twenty-six households (52.0%) and forty-five household contacts (43.7%) were infected. Secondary attack rate was lowest among children of index cases (6/23, 26.1%). Modified Poisson regression identified that the risk of transmission to household contacts increases significantly with age (Risk ratio for each increase in years of age = 1.01, 95% CI = 1.00-1.02). Mixed effects regression models identified that participants with chronic diseases, such as asthma, diabetes, cancer, or cardiac disease, had higher Cts at baseline when compared to participants without chronic diseases (6.62, 95% CI: 1.46-11.77, p = 0.02) and show a slower rate of increase in Ct over time (-0.43, 95% CI: -0.77 to -0.09, p = 0.02). This study suggests that HHT represents a key source of community-based infection of SARS-CoV-2. Allocation of resources for contact investigations and prevention interventions should focus on the individuals at highest risk of infection in households, especially those with higher density homes.

Risk factors for new bovine brucellosis infections in Colombian herds

BackgroundBovine brucellosis is a zoonotic disease that causes substantial economic losses and has a strong impact on public health. The main objective of this paper is to determine the risk factors for new infections of Brucella abortus on Colombian cattle farms previously certified as being free of brucellosis. A case-control study was conducted by comparing 98 cases (farms certified as brucellosis-free for three or more years but became infected) with 93 controls (farms that remained brucellosis-free during at least the previous three years). The farms were matched by herd size and geographical location (municipality). Information was obtained via a questionnaire completed by veterinary officers through a personal interview with the herd owners.ResultsTwo-thirds of the herds (67%) were dairy herds, 16% were beef herds, and 17% were dual-purpose (beef and milk) herds. After exploratory univariate analysis, all explanatory variables with a p-value of ≤0.20 were included in a logistic regression model using the forward stepwise method to select the model with the best goodness of fit. The significant risk factors were the replacement of animals from farms not certified as brucellosis-free compared to replacement from certified brucellosis-free farms (OR = 4.84, p-value < 0.001) and beef cattle farms compared to dairy cattle farms (OR = 3.61, p-value = 0.017). When herds with and without artificial insemination were compared, it was observed that farms that used natural breeding with bulls from non-certified herds had a higher risk than farms using artificial insemination (OR = 2.45, p-value = 0.037), but when the bulls came from brucellosis-free farms, farms with natural breeding were less affected (OR = 0.30, p-value = 0.004) than farms using artificial insemination, whether with frozen semen from certified brucellosis-free herds or fresh semen from uncontrolled herds. The latter is commonly sold to neighbouring farms.ConclusionsThe government should make efforts to inform farmers about the risks involved in the introduction of semen and replacement heifers from farms that are not certified as brucellosis-free and to establish measures to control these practices.

Impact of Euro-American sublineages of Mycobacterium tuberculosis on new infections among named contacts

The impact of demographic, clinical, and bacterial factors on new infection by Euro-American lineage Mycobacterium tuberculosis among contacts of patients with tuberculosis (TB) has not been evaluated. To describe the risk factors for new infection by Euro-American M. tuberculosis sublineages in San Francisco, California. We included contacts of patients with TB due to Euro-American M. tuberculosis. Sublineages were determined by large-sequence polymorphisms. We used tuberculin skin testing or QuantiFERON®-TB Gold In-Tube to identify contacts with new infection. Regression models with generalized estimating equations were used to determine the risk factors for new infection. We included 1488 contacts from 134 patients with TB. There were 79 (5.3%) contacts with new infection. In adjusted analyses, contacts of patients with TB due to region of difference 219 M. tuberculosis sublineage were less likely to have new infection (OR 0.23, 95%CI 0.06-0.84) than those with other sublineages. Other risk factors for new infection were contacts exposed to more than one patient with TB, contacts exposed for 30 days, or contacts with a history of smoking or excessive alcohol consumption. In addition to well-known exposure and clinical characteristics, bacterial characteristics independently contribute to the transmissibility of TB in San Francisco.

Risk factors for new infection with Leptospira in meat workers in New Zealand

ObjectiveTo evaluate risk factors for new infection with Leptospira interrogans sv Pomona and Leptospira borgpetersenii sv Hardjo in meat workers.MethodsSera were collected twice approximately 12 months apart from 592 workers...

Helicobacter pylori Infection in Dental Professionals: A 6‐year Prospective Study

In a previous cross-sectional study, we reported no significant differences between dentists and controls in the seroprevalence of Helicobacter pylori. The aim of the present study is to determine the risk and the risk factors for new infection of H. pylori. This is the first report designed to assess the seroprevalence of H. pylori infection over a 6-year period in a cohort of dental professionals. We collected blood samples from employees of Kanagawa Dental College to test for serum anti-H. pylori IgG. We collected 566 samples in 1997 and another 551 samples in 2003. Questionnaires completed by participants provided information about risk factors of H. pylori infection. A total of 236 employees were tested on both occasions. Of the 170 who were seronegative in 1997, we randomly selected 59 from among the dental professionals (dentists and dental nurses). As controls, we selected 59 from among the nonclinical staff who were matched for sex and age. The risk of new infection of H. pylori for dental professionals is 1.12%/year and the relative risk is 4.0. We determined the risk factors for acquiring H. pylori using logistic regression. Adjusted odds ratio being a dental professionals was 2.68 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.55-19.67), having upper gastrointestinal family history was 4.84 (95% CI: 0.83-26.72), and age over 40 was 8.83 (95% CI: 1.36-177.24). This 6-year prospective study shows that dental professionals are at greater risk of being infected by H. pylori than are controls.