Risk Factors For Massive Bleeding Research Articles

Risk factors of bleeding during rectal cancer surgery in obese patients in Japan.

According to several clinical trials for patients with rectal cancer, laparoscopic surgery significantly reduces intraoperative complications and bleeding compared with laparotomy and demonstrated comparable long-term results. However, obesity is considered one of the risk factors for increased surgical difficulty, including complication rate, prolonged operation time, and bleeding. Patients with clinical pathological stage II/III rectal cancer and a body mass index of ≥25 kg/m2 who underwent laparotomy or laparoscopic surgery between January 2009 and December 2013 at 51 institutions participating in the Japan Society of Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery were included. These patients were divided into major bleeding (>500 mL) group and minor bleeding (≤500 mL) group. The risk factors of major bleeding were evaluated by univariate and multivariate analyses. This study included 517 patients, of which 74 (19.9%) experienced major bleeding. Patient characteristics did not significantly differ between the two groups. The major bleeding group had a longer operative time (p < 0.001) and a larger tumor size than the minor bleeding group (p = 0.011). In the univariate analysis, age >65 years, laparotomy, operative time >300 min, and multivisceral resection were significantly associated with intraoperative massive bleeding. In the multivariate analysis, age >65 years (odds ratio [OR], 2.29; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.13-4.82), laparotomy (OR, 20.82; 95% CI, 11.56-39.75), operative time >300 min (OR, 5.39; 95% CI, 1.67-132), and multivisceral resection (OR, 10.72; 95% CI, 2.47-64.0) showed to be risk factors for massive bleeding. Age >65 years, laparotomy, operative time >300 min, and multivisceral resection were risk factors for massive bleeding during rectal cancer surgery in patients with obesity.

Preoperative BMI and Hb levels are important predictors of massive bleeding in liver transplant patients.

This study aims to compare intraoperative bleeding during liver transplant procedures and analyze the predictive role of preoperative laboratory indicators in significant intraoperative bleeding. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 271 cases of allogeneic liver transplant patients from January 2018 to June 2023. Patients were categorized into the massive bleeding (MB) group and the non-massive bleeding (non-MB) group based on the occurrence of significant intraoperative bleeding. Preoperative laboratory parameters between the MB and non-MB groups were compared, and univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed. ROC curves were performed to analyze the value of these parameters in distinguishing the MB and non-MB groups. In the MB group, body mass index (BMI), hemoglobin (Hb), platelet count (PLT), fibrinogen (Fib), and total protein (TP) levels were significantly lower than those in the non-MB group (p < 0.05). Conversely, prothrombin time (PT), international normalized ratio (INR), total bilirubin (TBIL), creatinine (CRE), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score, length of stay, and hospital stay were significantly higher in the MB group compared to the non-MB group (p < 0.05). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses revealed that preoperative BMI and Hb were independent risk factors for massive bleeding during liver transplantation. ROC curve analysis for predicting massive intraoperative bleeding showed that the area under the curve (AUC) of Hb was considerable (AUC: 0.83). Preoperative BMI and Hb levels are critical predictors of massive bleeding during liver transplantation, emphasizing the importance of proactive management based on these indicators for improved patient outcomes.

Analysis of the Risk Factors for Massive Hemorrhage after PCNL in the Oblique Supine Position.

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is a proven and efficient treatment method; Nevertheless, it is essential to note that there is still a risk of significant bleeding. The purpose of this paper is to explore the risk factors for massive hemorrhage after PCNL in the oblique supine position and provide a basis for the development of measures to prevent massive hemorrhage. The clinical data of 97 patients who underwent PCNL in the oblique supine position at Changshu No. 2 People's Hospital from January 2019 to December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were placed in the massive hemorrhage group if their hemoglobin levels decreased by ≥20 g/L 24 h after the operation, and the other patients were placed in the nonmassive hemorrhage group. Differences in sex, age, body mass index (BMI), hypertension, diabetes, surgical side, perirenal fat stranding (PFS), calculus long diameter, surgical access, and operation time were compared between the two groups to determine the risk factors for massive bleeding. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to determine the risk factors for massive hemorrhage after PCNL. There were no significant differences in sex, BMI, hypertension, diabetes, surgical side, or calculus long diameter between the two groups (p > 0.05), and there were statistically significant differences in age, PFS, surgical access, and operation time (p < 0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that PFS and extensive surgical access were independent risk factors (p < 0.05). PFS and extensive surgical access were independent risk factors. Carefully reading computed tomography (CT) films before surgery and reducing the size of the surgical access area are important measures for reducing the risk of massive hemorrhages.

Massive Bleeding After Surgical Repair in Acute Type A Aortic Dissection Patients: Risk Factors, Outcomes, and the Predicting Model.

BackgroundMassive bleeding throughout aortic repair in acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) patients is a common but severe condition that can cause multiple serious clinical problems. Here, we report our findings regarding risk factors, short-term outcomes, and predicting model for massive bleeding in ATAAD patients who underwent emergent aortic repair.MethodsA universal definition of perioperative bleeding (UDPB) class 3 and 4 were used to define massive bleeding and comprehensively evaluate patients. A total of 402 consecutive patients were enrolled in this retrospective study during 2019. Surgical strategies used to perform aortic arch procedures included total arch and hemiarch replacements. In each criterion, patients with massive bleeding were compared with remaining patients. Multivariable regression analyses were used to identify independent risk factors for massive bleeding. Logistic regression was used to build the model, and the model was evaluated with its discrimination and calibration.ResultsIndependent risk factors for massive bleeding included male sex (OR = 6.493, P < 0.001), elder patients (OR = 1.029, P = 0.05), low body mass index (BMI) (OR = 0.879, P = 0.003), emergent surgery (OR = 3.112, P = 0.016), prolonged cardiopulmonary bypass time (OR = 1.012, P = 0.002), lower hemoglobin levels (OR = 0.976, P = 0.002), increased D-dimer levels (OR = 1.000, P = 0.037), increased fibrin degradation products (OR = 1.019, P = 0.008), hemiarch replacement (OR = 5.045, P = 0.037), total arch replacement (OR = 14.405, P = 0.004). The early-stage mortality was higher in massive bleeding group (15.9 vs. 3.9%, P = 0.001). The predicting model showed a well discrimination (AUC = 0.817) and calibration (χ2 = 5.281, P = 0.727 > 0.05).ConclusionMassive bleeding in ATAAD patients who underwent emergent aortic repair is highly associated with gender, emergent surgery, increased D-dimer levels, longer CPB time, anemia, and use of a complex surgical strategy. Since massive bleeding may lead to worse outcomes, surgeons should choose suitable surgical strategies in patients who are at a high risk of massive bleeding.

Risk factors for massive hemorrhage during the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) is one of the serious complications associated with cesarean delivery (CD). This meta-analysis aims to identify risk factors associated with massive hemorrhage during the CSP treatment. Eight electronic databases were searched for case-control studies published before December 31th, 2018, which compared the possible factors causing massive bleeding during the CSP treatment. Quantitative synthesis was performed by RevMan 5.3. Sensitivity analysis and publication bias were performed by Stata 12.0. Total 20 case - control studies including 3101 CSP patients with previous CD met the inclusion criteria. Bleeding group had 573 patients and the control group had 2528 patients. The risk factors for massive bleeding during CSP treatment included multiple gravidities (MD = 0.15, 95% CI 0.03-0.28, P = 0.73), big maximum diameter of gestation sac (MD = 18.49mm, 95%CI 15.34-21.65, P < 0.01), high gestational days (MD = 8.98days, 95% CI 4.12-13.84, P < 0.01), high β-HCG level (MD = 21.39IU/ml, 95% CI 7.36-35.41, P = 0.03; MD = 3.02U/ml, 95% CI 0.21-5.84, P < 0.01) and rich blood flow around the lesion (OR = 6.73, 95% CI 3.93-11.51, P = 0.59). While, thick myometrium (MD = - 4.94mm, 95% CI - 6.12 to - 3.75, P < 0.01) may be protective factor. Multiple gravidities, big gestation sac, large gestational days, high serum β-HCG level, abundant blood supply to pregnancy sac and thin myometrium maybe the risk factors for massive bleeding during the CSP treatment.

Left Lobe Mobilization Strategy of Right-Sided Major Hepatectomy for Treatment of a Tumor Causing Severe Inferior Vena Cava Compression: A Novel Strategy Using the Modified Liver-Hanging Maneuver

Massive bleeding during major hepatectomy is associated with greater mortality and morbidity.1 Our previous study shows that inferior vena cava (IVC) compression by tumor and an anterior approach without the liver-hanging maneuver (LHM) are risk factors for massive bleeding.2 The LHM is useful for controlling bleeding in deeper parenchymal transection planes.3 However, severe compression of the IVC by tumor makes it difficult to insert a hanging tape.4 The study shows a novel modified LHM strategy for severe IVC compression to minimize intraoperative bleeding. The procedure was disassembled into six steps: (1) the glissonian bifurcation is encircled using an extrahepatic approach (2) the hepatic ligaments are dissected, and the root of each hepatic vein trunk is exposed (3) the left lobe is fully mobilized, and the short hepatic veins are carefully dissected with a systematic procedure established from hemi-left lobe procurement in living donor liver transplantation5 (4) the tape is inserted from the space between the right and middle hepatic vein trunks into the glissonian bifurcation along the anterior surface of the IVC (5) liver parenchymal transection is performed with upward pulling of the tape (6) the right hepatic vein is dissected, and the right lobe is dissected from the diaphragm and the right hepatic ligaments. Right hepatectomy with this procedure was performed for two patients with IVC compressed by hepatocellular carcinoma. The operative times were respectively 483 and 396min. The respective estimated blood losses were 1195 and 485ml, without transfusion. Both patients had acceptable outcomes without complications. The novel modified LHM strategy ensured minimal bleeding in the resection of a huge liver tumor causing severe IVC compression.

Study of the utility and problems of common iliac artery balloon occlusion for placenta previa with accreta.

AimsWe investigated whether common iliac artery balloon occlusion (CIABO) was effective for decreasing blood loss during cesarean hysterectomy (CH) in patients with placenta previa with accreta and was safe for mothers and fetuses.MethodsOf the 67 patients who underwent CH for placenta previa with accreta at our facility from 1985 to 2014, 57 patients were eligible for the study. The amount of intraoperative bleeding during CH was compared between three groups: surgery without blood flow occlusion (13 patients), internal iliac artery ligation (15 patients) and CIABO (29 patients). Additionally, multivariate analysis was performed to assess risk factors for massive bleeding during CH.ResultsThe mean blood loss in the CIABO group (2027 ± 1638 mL) was significantly lower than in the other two groups (3787 ± 2936 mL in the no occlusion, 4175 ± 1921 mL in the internal iliac artery ligation group; P < 0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that spontaneous placental detachment during surgery (odds ratio [OR] 49.174, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.98–1763.67), a history of ≥ 2 cesarean sections (OR 9.226, 95% CI 1.07–231.15) and no use of CIABO (OR 26.403, 95% CI 3.20–645.17) were significantly related to massive bleeding during surgery. There was no case of necrosis resulting from ischemia. The mean radiation dose during balloon placement never exceeded the threshold value for fetal exposure.ConclusionBleeding during CH for placenta previa with accreta can be decreased by CIABO. This study also confirmed the safety of CIABO in regard to maternal lower limb ischemia and fetal radiation exposure during balloon placement.

Risk factors for intraoperative hemorrhage at evacuation of a cesarean scar pregnancy following uterine artery embolization

ObjectiveTo determine risk factors associated with massive uterine bleeding during dilation and suction curettage (D&C) after uterine artery embolization (UAE) for the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP). MethodsData from 128 CSP patients treated with D&C after UAE were analyzed to assess risk factors associated with massive uterine bleeding (blood loss 500mL or more) during D&C after UAE. ResultsIn total, 15 CSP patients had massive bleeding during D&C after UAE. Univariate analysis showed that a greater gestational age (GA), a larger CSP mass size, a thinner myometrium at the implantation site, a GA of 8weeks or more, a CSP mass diameter of 6cm or more, and evidence of fetal heartbeat were risk factors for massive bleeding (P<0.05). In a binary logistic regression analysis, GA of 8weeks or more and CSP mass diameter of 6cm or more remained as the only significant risk factors for massive bleeding (OR 11.49 [95% CI 1.08–122.13] and OR 96.59 [95% CI 6.20–150.57], respectively; P<0.05). ConclusionFor CSP masses with a GA of 8weeks or more and a diameter of 6cm or more, the outcome of surgical evacuation after UAE tends to be unsatisfactory.

転移性脊椎腫瘍手術における出血量の比較検討とその対策

転移性脊椎腫瘍手術における出血量の比較検討とその対策

Risk Factors for Massive Bleeding during Major Hepatectomy

Massive bleeding during hepatectomy is a risk for mortality and morbidity. We examined the risk factors for massive bleeding and their correlations with outcomes. The study was a retrospective case series. Among 353 consecutively hepatectomized patients, the mean estimated blood loss (EBL) was 825 ml. Ten patients (2.8%) experienced EBL of between 3000 and 5000 ml. Five patients (1.4%) experienced massive EBL defined as more than 5000 ml, and all five patients had undergone right major hepatectomy (RMH) for primary liver cancer (PLC). All the patients with PLC who underwent RMH were divided into two groups: group I with EBL < or = 5000 ml (n = 19) and group II with EBL > 5000 ml (n = 5). Perioperative factors regarding massive bleeding and operative mortality and morbidity were compared between the two groups. Among the ten patients who experienced EBL of between 3000 and 5000 ml, three had partial hepatectomy of no more than subsegmentectomy of the paracaval portion of the caudate lobe and three had central bisegmentectomy. The mean tumor size was 7.9 +/- 4.7 cm in group I and 15.1 +/- 2.2 cm in group II (P = 0 .0034). Tumor compression of the inferior vena cava (IVC) on CT scans was observed in all patients in group II, but in no patients in group I (P < 0.0001). Four of five patients in group II received surgery through an anterior approach. The liver-hanging maneuver (LHM) was applied in 14 of 19 patients (74%) in group I but could not be applied in group II (P = 0.0059). No postoperative and in-hospital mortalities occurred in group II and there were no significant differences in the incidence of mortality and morbidity between the groups. RMH for large PLCs, tumor compression of the IVC, and an anterior approach without the LHM are risks for massive bleeding during hepatectomy. Preparation of rapid infusion devices in these cases is necessary to avoid prolonged hypotension.

Predisposing factors for massive hemorrhage during Cesarean section in patients with placenta previa

To investigate whether maternal history and ultrasound findings can be predictors for massive hemorrhage during Cesarean section in patients with placenta previa and adherence of the placenta. We reviewed 127 singleton pregnancies with placenta previa. Maternal history, antenatal ultrasound findings of the placenta, including location, presence of placental lacunae, lack of a clear zone, presence of sponge-like findings of the cervix and presence of a marginal sinus in cases of placenta previa were reviewed retrospectively, and their association with amount of bleeding during Cesarean section was analyzed. Logistic regression analysis revealed that advanced maternal age (odds ratio (OR), 5.4; 95% CI, 1.8-16.4), previous Cesarean section (OR, 20.4; 95% CI, 4.0-105.2) and sponge-like findings in the cervix (OR, 5.6; 95% CI, 1.8-17.0) were associated with massive bleeding (> 2500 mL). Placental adherence occurred in five cases and was more frequent in cases where the placenta was located at the site of the scar of a previous Cesarean section (OR, 123.1; 95% CI, 4.5-3395.2) and where there was lack of a clear zone (OR, 48.0; 95% CI, 3.8-604.7). Advanced maternal age, previous Cesarean section and presence of sponge-like findings in the cervix are risk factors for massive bleeding during Cesarean section in cases of placenta previa, regardless of whether placental adherence is present. Placental location on the scar of a previous Cesarean section and lack of a clear zone are risk factors for placental adherence. When these findings are identified preoperatively, management should be tailored accordingly.

Analysis of risk factors for massive intraoperative bleeding during laparoscopic splenectomy

Laparoscopic splenectomy is occasionally converted to open surgery due to massive intraoperative bleeding. The aim of this study was to identify the risk factors for massive bleeding during laparoscopic splenectomy. Fifty-three patients underwent laparoscopic splenectomy. The indications were hematologic disease in 25 patients, liver cirrhosis in 17 patients, and other conditions in 11 patients. Univariate analysis was conducted with Fisher's exact test, and multivariate analysis was conducted with a stepwise logistic regression model. None of the patients required open surgery. Blood loss of more than 800 ml was defined as massive intraoperative bleeding. Univariate analysis showed significant risk factors for massive bleeding to be liver cirrhosis, portal hypertension, splenomegaly, Child class, and preoperative platelet count. Independent risk factors in the multivariate analysis were portal hypertension and Child class. Careful attention to intraoperative bleeding during laparoscopic splenectomy is necessary for patients with portal hypertension and/or deteriorated liver function.

Risk Factors of Massive Bleeding Related to Pancreatic Leak after Pancreaticoduodenectomy

Most pancreatic leaks after pancreaticoduodenectomy were initially treated conservatively, and for the most part, they were self-limiting and closed spontaneously. But in a few patients, hemorrhage occurred 1 to 3weeks postoperatively and remained a fatal complication after pancreaticoduodenectomy. To identify possible risk factors for massive bleeding, the medical records of 402 patients who had pancreaticoduodenectomies were reviewed for leak complications and analyzed for associations between the occurrence of massive bleeding and preoperative, intraoperative, postoperative, and pathologic parameters. In univariate logistic regression analysis, infectious clinical signs (p=0.021, odds ratio [OR]=7.06, 95% CI=1.34, 37.12) and bile in the drainage fluid (p=0.036, OR=5.89, 95% CI=1.13, 30.86) were associated with the risk of developing massive hemorrhage. This combination provided the highest estimate of massive bleeding after pancreatic leak (p=0.005, OR=8.57, 95% CI=1.92, 38.35). Both infectious clinical signs and bile content in the drainage fluid considerably increase the risk of massive bleeding after pancreatic leak. Close observation of patients with these ominous signs is warranted.

Predictive value of intramural pH and other risk factors for massive bleeding from stress ulceration

We have devised and validated an indirect method for measuring the intramural pH in the stomachs of patients in the intensive care unit and have assessed its value in predicting the occurrence of massive hemorrhage from stress ulceration. The 103 patients, studied on an average of 3.8 ± 0.6 consecutive days, were assigned to one of five groups: no bleeding, weakly positive guaiac, strongly positive guaiac, massive bleeding from an extragastric site, and massive bleeding from stress ulceration. The pH in gastric juice, arterial blood, and the wall of the stomach, Pco2 and Po2 in gastric juice and arterial blood, and [HCO3−] in arterial blood were recorded, together with history of treatment with antacids, cimetidine, and heparin and the number of risk factors known to be associated with bleeding from stress ulceration. Massive bleeding from stress ulceration occurred in 7 patients, all of whom were receiving antacids. Six of these patients died. A logistic analysis of the data obtained showed that the occurrence of bleeding from stress ulceration was best predicted by consideration of the combination of the number of risk factors and intramural pH (p < 0.0001). Prediction by these variables was not improved by inclusion of any of the other variables recorded. Bleeding from stress ulceration was only seen in patients whose intramural pH had fallen below the lower limit of normality. The data indicate that intensive care unit patients would be better monitored if the intramural pH were measured, and that the occurrence of massive bleeding from stress ulceration would be better averted by maintaining the intramural pH at normal levels.