Risk Factors For Elbow Injuries Research Articles

Asymptomatic Medial Elbow Ultrasound Abnormality in Youth Baseball Players Is an Independent Risk Factor for Elbow Injury: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Background:Youth baseball players who experience elbow pain during the season frequently exhibit radiographic elbow abnormalities. However, it is unknown whether asymptomatic elbow abnormalities are risk factors for in-season elbow injuries.Purpose:To determine whether the preseason presence of asymptomatic medial epicondyle apophysitis is a risk factor for in-season elbow injuries in youth baseball players.Study Design:Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2.Methods:Youth baseball players (N = 210; age range, 7-12 years) with no pain or history of injury in their throwing arms underwent preseason evaluations that included shoulder and elbow range of motion measurements, shoulder muscle strength testing, and ultrasound elbow scans with a multifrequency 13-MHz linear array transducer. Over 1 year of play, the players and their parents maintained daily elbow pain diaries. Elbow injuries were defined as medial elbow symptoms that prevented ball throwing for ≥8 days.Results:The preseason ultrasound evaluation revealed medial epicondyle apophysitis in 59 players. In the year following, elbow injuries occurred in 17 (28.8%) players with preseason medial epicondyle apophysitis and 18 (11.9%) players without apophysitis. Independent predictors of elbow injuries were preseason medial epicondyle apophysitis (odds ratio [OR], 2.488; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.152-5.376; P = .02) and deficits of abduction (ABD) and external rotation of the dominant shoulder (OR, 0.963; 95% CI, 0.936-0.992; P = .012).Conclusion:Asymptomatic medial epicondyle apophysitis and ABD and external rotation deficits in the dominant shoulder were risk factors for elbow injuries in 7- to 12-year-old youth baseball players. These findings may aid in the design of programs to prevent elbow injuries in this population.

Identifying Risk Factors for Elbow Injury in Children Presenting to the Emergency Department With Distal Forearm Fractures.

Pediatric distal forearm fractures are one of the most common injuries seen in the emergency department. Orthopedic teaching instructs providers to radiograph the joint above and the joint below the fracture site for concurrent injury. Despite this teaching, there is little evidence to suggest that elbow injuries are common in children with distal forearm fractures. Similarly, there are few data that help the clinician predict which children are at higher risk for co-injury. We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of the 2011 National Emergency Department Sample data set. Children aged 2 to 17 years with an International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision, code for a distal forearm fracture were included in the study. The primary outcome of interest was an "elbow" injury, defined as an International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision, code for proximal radius, proximal ulna, or distal humeral fracture or dislocation. Multivariable logistic regression was performed using patient demographics, injury severity score, mechanism of injury, and underlying medical conditions. A total of 54,262 children with a distal forearm fracture were identified. Of these children, only 0.8% (n = 463) had an elbow injury. Supracondylar fractures of the humerus were the most common elbow injury seen (48.2% of elbow injuries seen). Children were more likely to have a co-injury if they were younger (9.8 years vs 8.3 years, P < 0.01), female (36% vs 44%, P < 0.01), injured via fall (68% vs 76%, P < 0.01), had a higher injury severity score (4.1 vs 4.5, P < 0.01), or were admitted for their injuries (1.5% vs 15.7%, P < 0.01). In the adjusted model, only age and disposition were predictors of co-injury. Isolated buckle fracture of the radius and metaphyseal fracture of the radius with dorsal angulation were protective against elbow injury (odds ratio = 0.39 and 0.60, respectively). Children with distal forearm fractures very rarely have concurrent elbow injuries. These injuries are more likely in younger female children.

Isokinetic Strength of the Dominant and Non-dominant Elbow in Elite Male Volleyball Players

The purpose of this research is to compare the elbow isokinetic strength applied at different angular velocities on the dominant and non-dominant side in elite male volleyball players. Fifteen elite volleyball players participated in the research. Isokinetic elbow flexion and extension strength were separately obtained on concentric/concentric dominant and non-dominant side as 5 repetitions at 60˚.s-1 angular velocity, 10 repetitions at 180˚.s-1 and 15 repetitions at 300˚.s-1. In the research, the peak torque (PT), peak torque/body weight (PT/BW), flexion/extension ratio (B/T), angle of PT, work and power parameters were compared between the dominant and non-dominant elbows. No significant difference was found between the dominant and non-dominant side in the elbow isokinetic strength parameters of the subjects at three different velocities. A significant difference was found at three different velocities only in the angle of PT flexion (p &amp;lt; 0.05). It is thought that this difference may result from the muscle shortening that may occur on muscle length (longitudinal effect) as a result of the more concentric contraction of the muscle on the dominant side compared to the non-dominant muscle. Consequently, there is not any isokinetic strength difference between the dominant and non-dominant elbow in elite male volleyball players. Isokinetic elbow test can provide important information regarding the potential risk factors for elbow injuries. For this reason, it is recommended to include this test in the functional screening of volleyball players.

Risk Factors for Baseball-Related Arm Injuries: A Systematic Review.

Background:Contributing factors for arm injuries among baseball players have been described. However, no review has systematically identified risk factors with findings from prospective cohort studies.Purpose:To systematically review prospective cohort studies that investigated risk factors for arm injury among baseball players.Study Design:Systematic review; Level of evidence, 3.Methods:Electronic databases were searched for relevant English-language studies. Titles, abstracts, and full-text articles were screened by 2 blinded reviewers to identify only prospective cohort studies and randomized controlled trials. Two independent investigators screened each article for appropriate criteria.Results:Fourteen prospective articles were selected for this review. Youth, high school, and professional baseball players (N = 2426) were pooled, and 43 risk factors were assessed in relation to general arm, shoulder, and elbow injuries. All studies evaluated players for at least 1 season. Deficits in preseason shoulder range of motion and strength were significant risk factors for general arm or shoulder injury among high school and professional players. Elbow and shoulder varus torque at peak external shoulder rotation during pitching, high pitch velocity, and shoulder rotational and flexion deficits were risk factors for elbow injuries among professional pitchers. Pitching >100 innings in 1 year, being aged 9 to 11 years, being a pitcher or catcher, training >16 hours per week, and having a history of elbow pain were significant risk factors for elbow injury among youth players.Conclusion:History of elbow pain and age had a high risk of associated elbow injury among youth players. Training or pitching load also increased elbow injury risk for youth athletes. Loss of shoulder range of motion appears to increase risk for elbow injury among professional athletes. Single time-point data collections per season, studies with the same sample population, and studies with self-reported injury and risk factor data may limit the interpretation of these findings. Health care professionals should use caution when assessing injury risk during evaluation and making decisions about the training workload and playing time of baseball players.

Exceeding Pitch Count Recommendations In Youth Baseball Increases The Elbow Injuries

Objectives:With the incidence of Little League elbow increasing, pitch limit recommendations for preventing throwing injuries have been developed in the United States and Japan. In 1995, the Japanese Society of Clinical Sports Medicine announced limits of 50 pitches per day and 200 pitches per week to prevent throwing injuries in younger than 12 years old. However the relationship between pitch limit recommendation and elbow injuries among pitchers has not been adequately studied. The aim of our study was to evaluate the association between pitch counts and elbow injuries in youth pitchers.Methods:A total of 149 pitchers without prior elbow pain were observed prospectively for 1 season to study injury incidence in relation to specific risk factors. Average age was 10.1 years (range, 7-11 years). One year later, all pitchers were examined by questionnaire. Subjects were asked whether they had experienced any episodes of elbow pain during the season. The questionnaire was also used to gather data on pitch counts per day and per week, age, number of training days per week, and number of games per year. We investigated the following risk factors for elbow injury: pitch counts, age, position, number of training days per week, and number of games per year. Data were analyzed by multivariate logistic regression models and presented as odds ratio (OR) and profile likelihood 95% confidence interval (CI) values. The likelihood-ratio test was also performed. A two-tailed P value of less than .05 was considered significant. All analysis was done in the SAS software package (version 8.2).Results:Of the 149 subjects, 66 (44.3%) reported episodes of pain in the throwing elbow during the season. 1. Analysis for pitch count per dayUnivariate analysis showed that elbow pain was significantly associated with more than 50 pitches per day. Multivariate analysis showed that more than 50 pitches per day (OR, 2.44; 95% CI, 1.22-4.94), and more than 70 games per year (OR, 2.47; 95% CI, 1.24-5.02) were risk factors significantly associated with elbow pain. Age and number of training days per week were not significantly associated with elbow pain. 1. Analysis for pitch count per weekUnivariate analysis showed that elbow pain was significantly associated with more than 200 pitches per week. Multivariate analysis showed that more than 200 pitches per week (OR, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.03-4.10), and more than 70 games per year (OR, 2.41; 95% CI, 1.22-4.87) were risk factors significantly associated with elbow pain. Age was not significantly associated with elbow pain.Conclusion:A total of 44.3% of youth baseball pitchers had elbow pain during the season. Multivariable logistic regression revealed that elbow pain was associated with more than 50 pitches per day, more than 200 pitches per week, and more than 70 games per year. Previous studies have revealed the risk factor with the strongest association to injury is pitcher. Our data suggest that compliance with pitch limit recommendations including limits of 50 pitches per day and 200 pitches per week may be protective against elbow injuries. Those who played more than 70 games per year had a notably increased risk of injury. With increasing demand on youth pitchers to play more, there is less time for repair of bony and soft tissues in the elbow. In conclusion, among youth pitchers, limits of 50 pitches per day, 200 pitches per week, and limits of 70 games per year may protect elbow injuries.

A clinical and ultrasonographic study of risk factors for elbow injury in young baseball players.

To determine the risk factors for elbow injury and its association with glenohumeral internal rotation deficit among young baseball players. 229 baseball players aged 9 to 14 (mean, 11) years completed a self-administered questionnaire with items related to years of playing baseball, hours of training per weekday, days of training per week, and past and present experience of elbow pain. Two orthopaedic surgeons measured the range of motion of both shoulders and elbows. Another 2 orthopaedic surgeons performed ultrasonography to detect any elbow abnormality such as fragmentation of the medial epicondylar apophysis and osteochondritis dissecans of the capitellum. Using univariate and multivariable analyses, participants with or without elbow abnormality were compared to determine the risk factors for elbow abnormality. Elbow abnormality was detected in 100 of the participants and comprised osteochondritis dissecans of the capitellum (n=18) and fragmentation of the medial epicondylar apophysis (n=82). Elbow abnormality was associated with being a pitcher, past and present experience of elbow pain, loss of elbow extension, and the side-to-side internal rotation difference. The 100 participants with elbow abnormality were stratified into symptomatic (n=57) or asymptomatic (n=43) of elbow pain. Those with elbow abnormality and elbow pain was associated with being a pitcher. Being a pitcher was a risk factor for both elbow abnormality and elbow pain. Nonetheless, 43% of baseball players with elbow abnormality were asymptomatic. The use of ultrasonography was effective in detecting elbow abnormality and enabling early treatment.

Relationship Between Tightness of the Hip Joint and Elbow Pain in Adolescent Baseball Players.

Background:Repetitive tensile stresses from valgus torque can induce elbow injury in adolescent baseball players. Insufficient hip range of motion (ROM) can change throwing mechanics, reducing the transfer of energy from the lower to the upper extremities. Thus, hip ROM limitations may force the upper extremities to bear the burden of a strong throw. Improper pitching mechanics caused by insufficient hip ROM are thought to increase valgus torque on the elbow when throwing, increasing the risk of elbow injury.Purpose:To investigate the relationship between elbow pain and hip ROM in adolescent baseball players.Study Design:Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.Methods:A total of 122 adolescent baseball players with a mean age of 12.0 years (range, 6-14 years) participated in this study. Elbow pain, hip flexion angle, and the internal rotation angles of the hip at 0° and 90° of flexion were assessed. Participants were divided into a pain group and a normal group based on the pain assessment, and each hip angle was compared between groups using Student t tests. P values <.05 were considered statistically significant.Results:Thirty-one of 122 players had elbow pain. The hip flexion angle of the trail leg was 121.9° ± 12.3° for the normal group and 111.2° ± 11.3° for the pain group (P = .0001). The plant leg hip flexion angles were 122.0° ± 12.4° and 113.6° ± 11.3° (P = .0014) for the normal and pain groups, respectively. The internal rotation angle at 0° of hip flexion of the trail leg was 49.4° ± 12.6° and 45.6° ± 8.8° (not significant), and of the plant leg was 49.1° ± 12.5° and 48.7° ± 11.5° (not significant), for the normal and pain groups, respectively. The internal rotation of the trail leg at 90° of hip flexion was 46.9° ± 13.3° in the normal group and 36.1° ± 15.7° in the pain group (P = .0005). In the plant leg, the internal rotation angle at 90° of hip flexion was 46.9° ± 12.2° and 36.4° ± 18.1° for the normal and pain groups, respectively (P = .0013).Conclusion:Limitations to hip flexion and internal rotation at 90° of hip flexion were risk factors for elbow injury. Differences in internal rotation angles between 0° and 90° of hip flexion may be important criteria for identifying adolescent baseball players at risk of elbow pain.

Elbow Injuries in Youth Baseball Players Without Prior Elbow Pain: A 1-Year Prospective Study.

Background:Many risk factors for throwing injuries have been proposed. However, little is known about the risk factors for elbow injuries, particularly on physeal injuries in youth baseball players without prior elbow pain.Purpose:To investigate the risk factors for elbow injuries with a focus on physeal injuries that could predispose youth baseball players without elbow pain to elbow injuries.Study Design:A prospective epidemiology study.Methods:In 2006, 449 players without prior elbow pain were observed prospectively for 1 season to study injury incidence in relation to specific risk factors. The average age was 10.1 years (range, 7-11 years). One year later, all players were examined by administering a questionnaire, physical examination, and radiographic examination. Data for the groups with and without elbow pain were analyzed using multivariate logistic regression models.Results:Among the 449 participants, 30.5% reported episodes of elbow pain during the season. Of the players who reported elbow pain, 72.3% presented abnormal findings on physical examination, and of those players, 81.4% had radiographic abnormalities. Multivariate analysis showed that the age of 12 years (at 1-year examination), pitcher and catcher positions, and playing more than 100 games per year were risk factors for elbow pain.Conclusion:It is expected that 30% of youth baseball players have elbow pain each year, and nearly 60% of players with elbow pain exhibit radiographic abnormalities. The age of 12 years, pitcher and catcher positions, and playing more than 100 games per year are risk factors for elbow pain.

Risk factors for elbow injuries among young baseball players

There are some risk factors that could predispose a young baseball player to elbow injuries. Study participants were 294 baseball players aged 9 to 12 years old. A questionnaire, physical examination, and ultrasound imaging to investigate elbow injuries were performed. Data for the groups with and without elbow injuries were analyzed statistically using multivariate logistic regression models. Ultrasound imaging showed that 60 participants had elbow injuries, including medial epicondylar fragmentation in 58 and osteochondritis dissecans of the capitellum in 2. The odds ratio (95% confidence interval) of the risk factors that statistical analysis showed were significant were age older than 11 years, 2.82 (1.30-6.10); height exceeding 150 cm, 2.02 (1.07-3.82); pitching, 4.50 (2.42-8.37); daily training, 1.96 (1.02-3.79); range of motion (ROM) of external rotation of the shoulder below 130 degrees , 1.98 (1.01-3.87); muscle strength (MS) of external rotation of the shoulder exceeding 80 N, 4.11 (1.47-11.55); and MS of internal rotation of the shoulder exceeding 100 N, 2.04 (1.08-3.90). Risk factors for elbow injuries are age, height, pitcher, days of training, grip strength, range of motion of external rotation of the shoulder, and muscle strength of the shoulder. As new information, our results suggest that decrease of ROM of external rotation of the shoulder and increase of MS of external and internal rotation of the shoulder predispose elbow injuries.