Risk Factors For Developmental Dysplasia Research Articles

2D/4D Finger Length Ratio in the Screening of Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip.

To investigate whether there is a relationship between the 2nd finger and 4th finger length measurement ratios and developmental dysplasia of the Hip (DDH). Cross-sectional observational study. Place and Duration of the Study:Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Meram Faculty of Medicine Hospital, Konya, Turkiye, from January 2020 to May 2023. Infants were screened for DDH with Graff method for the ultrasounds of both hips. Lengths of the 2nd and 4th fingers of both hands were measured and recorded. Patients with additional risk factors for developmental dysplasia of the hip (breech birth, family history, oligohydramnios, swaddling) were excluded. Two hundred and fifty-six babies were screened including 55.1% (n = 141) girls and 44.9% (n = 115) boys. Their mean age was 2.51 ± 0.80 months. The average lengths were 31.73 ± 3.05 mm, for the left 2nd finger and 34.26 ± 3.48 mm for the left 4th finger. In the hip USG measurements, the mean alpha angles were 62.91 ± 3.12° for the right hip and, 63.20 ± 3.55° for the left hip. Eighteen (7%) of babies who underwent hip ultrasound (USG) had unilateral or bilateral DDH. Among these cases, 2.7% (n = 7) had right, 2.3% (n = 6) had left, and 2% (n = 5) had bilateral DDH. There was no statistically significant correlation between the ratios of right 2/4 finger lengths and the right alpha angle (rs = 0.051; p = 0.421). There was a statistically positive and statistically significant correlation between the ratios of left 2/4 finger lengths and the left alpha angle (rs = 0.154; p = 0.013). Only the left-hand finger ratio among the parameters in the model had a statistically significant effect on DDH. Therefore, the left hand 2D/4D finger length may be of value in screening for DDH. Developmental dysplasia of the hip, Second to fourth finger digit ratio, Ring finger, Digit ratios.

Risk factors of developmental dysplasia of the hip in infants: A meta-analysis based on cohort studies

IntroductionDevelopmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is a prevalent condition in children. Currently, the exact etiology of DDH remains uncertain. The objective of this study was to conduct a meta-analysis to investigate the risk factors associated with DDH in infants. The findings would provide a theoretical foundation for targeted early screening and diagnosis. HypothesisSeveral indicators, such as gender, intrauterine position, family history of DDH, gestational age, delivery mode, amniotic fluid levels, swaddling, parity, fetus number, combined musculoskeletal deformities, birth weight, and physical examination results, may serve as risk factors for DDH. Materials and methodsCohort studies investigating the risk factors of DDH in infants through logistic regression analysis were searched in the Wanfang, VIP citation, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), China Biology Medicine disc, Excerpta Medica Database (Embase), PubMed, and Cochrane Library databases up to May 2023. After extracting the data from eligible literature and assessing them using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS), articles were selected based on pre-established inclusion and exclusion criteria. ResultsA total of eleven literature reports covering 979,757 infants were included in this meta-analysis. The publication bias did not significantly influence the results. The incidence rate of DDH was 47.99‰ among infants with risk factors compared to 3.21‰ in the general population. Risk factors for DDH included being female (OR=6.97, 95% CI: 5.18–9.39, p<0.001), breech delivery (OR=4.14, 95% CI: 3.09–5.54, p<0.001), positive family history (OR=4.07, 95% CI: 2.20–7.52, p<0.001), cesarean section (OR=1.11, 95% CI: 1.01–1.21, p=0.032), oligohydramnios (OR=3.93, 95% CI: 1.29–12.01, p=0.016), swaddling (OR=6.74, 95% CI: 1.25–36.31, p=0.026), firstborn status (OR=1.84, 95% CI: 1.49–2.53, p<0.001), combined musculoskeletal malformations (OR=2.27, 95% CI: 1.58–3.27, p<0.001), and physical signs of DDH (OR=8.71, 95% CI: 2.44–31.07, p=0.001). Premature delivery (OR=0.91, 95% CI: 0.88–0.95, p<0.001) was a protective factor for DDH. The relationship between multiple pregnancies (OR=0.58, 95% CI: 0.33–1.02, p=0.060) and low birth weight (OR=0.62, 95% CI: 0.14–2.76, p=0.529) in relation to DDH remained uncertain. DiscussionThis meta-analysis shows that female, breech delivery, positive family history, cesarean section, firstborn status, oligohydramnios, swaddling and combined musculoskeletal malformations are associated with DDH. Premature delivery appeared to be a protective factor against DDH. Nevertheless, the other factors need more research to reach more conclusive results. Level of evidenceIII; meta-analysis.

Risk factors for a false negative Ortolani and Barlow examination in developmental dysplasia of the hip

IntroductionAlthough universal screening by neonatal clinical examination with Ortolani and Barlow manoeuvres is widely adopted, its role as a sole screening tool is controversial due to its poor sensitivity and failure in identifying hip joints that eventually require surgical intervention. HypothesisThis study aims to identify risk factors for a false negative Ortolani and Barlow examination in neonatal screening for DDH. The hypothesis is that risk factors for developmental dysplasia of the hips could similarly be risk factors for a false negative Ortolani and Barlow examination. Material and methodsIn the 14-year retrospective cohort study, all newborn infants born in a single institution from 1st January 1999 to 31st December 2013 were screened clinically with the Ortolani/Barlow manoeuvre by a neonatologist. Infants with positive risk factors, despite a normal clinical examination, were then scheduled for bilateral hip ultrasound in the first three months of life and evaluated according to the Graf's method, Harcke's method of dynamic ultrasound screening and Terjesen's method of evaluation for femoral head coverage. ResultsA total of 164 infants with normal Ortolani and Barlow examinations were scheduled for bilateral hip ultrasound due to the presence of risk factors. Amongst these, 32 (19.5%) infants were evaluated to have an abnormal hip on ultrasound. Breech position was the only statistically significant risk factor for a false negative Ortolani/Barlow examination (14/34, 41.2% vs. 18/112, 13.8%; p<0.001). DiscussionSonographic hip examinations are recommended for all infants with breech presentation even if they have a normal Ortolani and Barlow examination. Level of evidenceIII; case-control study.

The cost effectiveness of potential risk factors for developmental dysplasia of the hip within a national screening programme

Early detection of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is associated with improved outcomes of conservative treatment. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate a novel screening programme that included both the primary risk factors of breech presentation and family history, and the secondary risk factors of oligohydramnios and foot deformities. A five-year prospective registry study investigating every live birth in the study's catchment area (n = 27,731), all of whom underwent screening for risk factors and examination at the newborn and six- to eight-week neonatal examination and review. DDH was diagnosed using ultrasonography and the Graf classification system, defined as grade IIb or above or rapidly regressing IIa disease (≥4o at four weeks follow-up). Multivariate odds ratios were calculated to establish significant association, and risk differences were calculated to provide quantifiable risk increase with DDH, positive predictive value was used as a measure of predictive efficacy. The cost-effectiveness of using these risk factors to predict DDH was evaluated using NHS tariffs (January 2021). The prevalence of DDH that required treatment within our population was 5/1,000 live births. The rate of missed presentation of DDH was 0.43/1000 live births. Breech position, family history, oligohydramnios, and foot deformities demonstrated significant association with DDH (p < 0.0001). The presence of breech presentation increased the risk of DDH by 1.69% (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.93% to 2.45%), family history by 3.57% (95% CI 2.06% to 5.09%), foot deformities by 8.95% (95% CI 4.81% to 13.1%), and oligohydramnios nby 11.6% (95 % CI 3.0% to 19.0%). Primary risk factors family history and breech presentation demonstrated an estimated cost-per-case detection of £6,276 and £11,409, respectively. Oligohydramnios and foot deformities demonstrated a cost-per-case detected less than the cost of primary risk factors of £2,260 and £2,670, respectively. The inclusion of secondary risk factors within a national screening programme was clinically successful as they were more cost and resource-efficient predictors of DDH than primary risk factors, suggesting they should be considered in the national guidance.

Is prematurity a risk factor for developmental dysplasia of the hip? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is the most common orthopedic disorder in newborns. Early recognition and diagnosis are critical to prevent long-term complications. While several risk factors have been established, the association between prematurity and DDH remains unclear. Our analysis sought to analyze the literature exploring the relationship between prematurity and DDH. Articles evaluating the relationship between prematurity and DDH published between 1 January 2000 and 1 February 2022 were queried, with 11 studies included for analysis. Overall, a total of 8720 patients were included. The gestational age ranged from 23 to 36 weeks for preterm and ≥37 weeks for term births. Seven studies agreed that gestational age did not have a significant impact on DDH. Pooled analysis of available data demonstrated no significant difference in DDH among preterm and term infants (OR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.82-1.51; P = 0.49). Sub-group analysis of two studies reporting data on very preterm (≤32 weeks) and term infants revealed no significant difference in the occurrence of DDH (OR, 4.58; 95% CI, 0.09-244.78; P = 0.45). Four studies found early gestational age is associated with a significantly higher incidence of mature hips compared to late preterm or term babies. Similarly, pooled analysis demonstrated significantly lower Graf classification among preterm infants (OR, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.03-0.61; P = 0.009). Based on the current literature, our analysis found that prematurity is not strongly associated with DDH. Furthermore, early gestational age was associated with a significantly higher incidence of mature hips measured by Graf classification.

Risk factors of developmental dysplasia of the hip in a single clinical center

Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is the main cause of early-onset hip osteoarthritis in adulthood. Early screening of DDH is the key to avoiding these severe complications. This study aimed to assure the risk factors are suitable for screening patients with DDH in our region. We retrospectively analyzed 10,668 patients (21,336 hips) at our hospital. Overall, 204 patients with pathological DDH and 408 patients with normal hips were included in this study. All patients were diagnosed by performing ultrasound examinations according to the Graf technique. The risk factors were assessed based on patients’ clinical data. Pearson’s chi-square or Fisher’s exact tests and multivariate logistic regression analysis were performed for statistical analysis. A total of 204 patients were diagnosed with pathologic DDH and were treated with the Pavlik harness. Among these, 184 patients were female. There were 73 cases of first birth, 13 had oligohydramnios, 13 had foot deformity, 31 had breech delivery, 6 had congenital muscular torticollis. Female sex, vaginal delivery, breech presentation, oligohydramnios and foot deformity were identified as the risk factors for DDH. The risk factors of DDH in our clinical center were confirmed in our clinical center, this can supply the screening advice for the doctors.

Radiographic Follow-up After Normal Ultrasound Screening of the Hip in Breech Infants.

Breech presentation is one of the most important risk factors for developmental dysplasia of the hip, and all breech infants should be screened. The necessity of further follow-up of developmental dysplasia of the hip after normal clinical and sonographic screening is a controversial subject. The purpose of this study to identify the incidence of delayed dysplasia in breech infants after normal ultrasound screening and the necessity of further clinical and radiologic follow-up in these patients. We included the 292 breech babies (128 boys and 164 girls) who showed normal hip ultrasound screening results. To determine the incidence of delayed radiographic dysplasia, anteroposterior hip radiographs were taken between 12 and 24 months of age to measure the acetabular index (AI). The mean AI values were 22.8±3.4 in boys and 24.9±3.1 in girls. Applying the Tönnis criteria, 29 patients (9.9%) were considered to have delayed radiographic dysplasia (16 boys and 13 girls). No significant difference was found in any demographic variables between babies with and without delayed radiographic dysplasia. None of these 29 infants underwent any treatment for radiographic dysplasia. Applying Kuong's criteria to 292 infants, only 2 patients (0.7%) demonstrated radiographic dysplasia on the hip anteroposterior radiographs taken at 14 months. The incidence of radiographic dysplasia significantly varied depending on which criteria were applied. In order to find out more accurate incidence rates of delayed radiographic dysplasia, large-scale studies of the normative AI data for Korean infants are required. Prognostic Level III.

The infants who have mature hip on ultrasonography but have risk factors of developmental dysplasia of the hip are required radiographic examination.

Objectives This study aims to evaluate the short-term results of infants who were radiologically diagnosed with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH), but in whom hip development was normal ultrasonographically. Patients and methods Between January 2018 and September 2020, a total of 15 infants (2 males, 13 females; median age: 5 months; range, 4 to 6 months) who were diagnosed with DDH radiologically and treated were retrospectively analyzed. Hip ultrasonography was used for early diagnosis, treatment, and for follow-up in infants up to six months of age. While the ultrasonographic findings were normal, radiography was performed in infants between four to six months of age who were at risk for DDH.Results Fifteen patients (22 hips) were diagnosed with DDH radiologically and treated. Radiologic dysplasia continued in seven hips of five patients during short-term follow-up.Conclusion These results suggest that ultrasonographic hip maturation may not be consistent with normal hip development in infants, particularly in those who are at risk for DDH. In infants with DDH which is confirmed by radiography (less than 6 months of age), the diagnosis may be missed on ultrasonographic examination.

Breech Presentation in Twins as a Risk Factor for Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip.

Introduction:Identifying risk factors associated with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is essential for early diagnosis and treatment. Breech presentation is a major DDH risk factor, possibly because of crowding of the fetus within the uterus. In multifetal pregnancy, fetuses are generally smaller than singletons, which may obscure the effect of breech presentation on fetal hips. Only a few studies have investigated the occurrence of DDH in multifetal pregnancies. In this study, we aimed to evaluate whether the breech presentation is a major risk factor of DDH in twin pregnancies.Methods:This retrospective study included 491 consecutive live births (after 23+0 weeks gestation) delivered through cesarean section with at least 1 baby with noncephalic presentation in single or twin pregnancies from April 2013 to October 2018. We analyzed the incidence of DDH and its associated factors, including sex, breech, and multifetal pregnancy, with a generalized linear mixed model.Results:The incidence of DDH was 12.5% in singleton with breech presentation, 9.8% in twin-breech presentation, and 0.7% in twin-cephalic presentation. Multivariate analysis showed that singleton-breech presentation (P=0.003), twin-breech presentation (P=0.003), and female sex (P=0.008) were independent risk factors for DDH.Conclusion:Breech presentation is an independent risk factor for DDH in twin pregnancies, although twin pregnancy itself is not an independent risk factor for DDH.

Developmental Dysplasia of Hip and Post-natal Positioning: Role of Swaddling and Baby-Wearing.

Traditional swaddling, which implies restrictive immobilisation of the infant's lower limbs with the hips in forced extension and adduction, has been shown to be a risk factor for Developmental Dysplasia of Hip (DDH). We reviewed the literature regarding the correlation between DDH and post-natal positioning by swaddling and baby-wearing, to draw awareness of healthcare professionals towards an important risk factor for DDH that has often been overlooked. There is overwhelming evidence in the literature, by both experimental and clinical studies, that proves the close association between improper post-natal positioning of the baby's hips in extension-adduction and an increased incidence of DDH. On the other hand, "hip safe" swaddling which allows unrestricted flexion-abduction movements of the infants' hips, and the use of baby-wearing devices which keep the lower limbs in an attitude of hip flexion-abduction and knee flexion, is optimal for hip development. Populations which practice these "hip-safe" techniques of infant immobilisation have a lower incidence of DDH as compared to those which practice restrictive immobilisation. Furthermore, populations which have adopted "hip-safe" positioning have demonstrated a significant decrease in the incidence of DDH. Understanding this association is vital, since this is a modifiable risk factor, rectification of which can decrease the incidence of DDH. Policy makers and governments must design educational campaigns tailored to their respective populations to increase awareness regarding the benefits of "hip-safe" techniques of infant positioning, since this simple intervention has the potential of decreasing the incidence of DDH.

Is foot deformity associated with developmental dysplasia of the hip?

AimsTo assess if congenital foot deformity is a risk factor for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH).MethodsBetween 1996 and 2012, 60,844 children were born in Sør-Trøndelag county in Norway. In this cohort study, children with risk factors for DDH were examined using ultrasound. The risk factors evaluated were clinical hip instability, breech delivery, a family history of DDH, a foot deformity, and some syndromes. As the aim of the study was to examine the risk for DDH and foot deformity in the general population, children with syndromes were excluded. The information has been prospectively registered and retrospectively analyzed.ResultsOverall, 494 children (0.8%) had DDH, and 1,132 (1.9%) a foot deformity. Of the children with a foot deformity, 49 (4.3%) also demonstrated DDH. There was a statistically significant increased association between DDH and foot deformity (p < 0.001). The risk of DDH was highest for talipes calcaneovalgus (6.1%) and club foot (3.5%), whereas metatarsus adductus (1.5%) had a marginal increased risk of DDH.ConclusionCompared with the general population, children with a congenital foot deformity had a significantly increased risk for DDH and therefore we regard foot deformity as a true risk factor for DDH.Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(11):1582–1586.

Is foot deformity associated with developmental dysplasia of the hip?

To assess if congenital foot deformity is a risk factor for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). Between 1996 and 2012, 60,844 children were born in Sør-Trøndelag county in Norway. In this cohort study, children with risk factors for DDH were examined using ultrasound. The risk factors evaluated were clinical hip instability, breech delivery, a family history of DDH, a foot deformity, and some syndromes. As the aim of the study was to examine the risk for DDH and foot deformity in the general population, children with syndromes were excluded. The information has been prospectively registered and retrospectively analyzed. Overall, 494 children (0.8%) had DDH, and 1,132 (1.9%) a foot deformity. Of the children with a foot deformity, 49 (4.3%) also demonstrated DDH. There was a statistically significant increased association between DDH and foot deformity (p < 0.001). The risk of DDH was highest for talipes calcaneovalgus (6.1%) and club foot (3.5%), whereas metatarsus adductus (1.5%) had a marginal increased risk of DDH. Compared with the general population, children with a congenital foot deformity had a significantly increased risk for DDH and therefore we regard foot deformity as a true risk factor for DDH.

Is Prematurity a Protective Factor Against Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip? A Retrospective Analysis of 660 Newborns.

In Middle Europe developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) has an incidence of up to 5.9 %. The rate of congenital hip dislocation as the worst complication of a growth disorder of the hip is between 1.5 % and 2.5 %. Among known risk factors of DDH are breech position, multiples, foot deformities and family history. The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate prematurity as a risk factor for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). The hips of 283 infants who were born before the 38th week of gestation or earlier, and those of 377 infants who were born after the 37th week of gestation, none of whom had other risk factors for DDH, were compared using the ultrasound technique according to Graf et al., within the first week after birth. Both hips of all infants were included in the study. Surprisingly, the difference in alpha angles between the two groups was statistically extremely significant, favoring the preterm infants. Moreover, we found a physiological curve of alpha angle development with a peak after the 31st week of gestation. The incidence of pathological dysplasia was not significantly different in the two groups. Our results suggest that prematurity is not a predisposing factor for DDH, but rather is protective for hip development.

Swaddling Practices in an Indian Institution: Are they Hip-Safe? A Survey of Paediatricians, Nurses and Caregivers.

Traditional infant swaddling or binding with hips and knees extended is a known risk factor for Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip (DDH), while 'hip-safe swaddling' with hips and knees flexed is believed to eliminate this risk. We conducted a survey to determine the prevalent practices for infant swaddling in India; why mothers practice swaddling and who teaches them; and whether Paediatricians, nurses and caregivers are aware of hip-safe swaddling. Anonymous one-time surveys were conducted in three groups-Paediatricians, Nurses and caregivers - at a tertiary-care, urban based, paediatric and maternity hospital. Forty-five paediatricians, 219 nurses and 100 caregivers were surveyed. Ninety percent caregivers practiced traditional swaddling, for on average 10.2hours a day, starting soon after birth, up to 4.2months of life. Traditional swaddling was advocated by 99% nurses and 53% Paediatricians. Reasons for swaddling included sleep, warmth and the misbelief that the child's legs would remain bowed if not bound straight; contrarily few mothers (8%) avoided swaddling out of superstition. Mothers learntswaddling mainly from relatives (94%) and nurses (64%). Most nurses (70%) had learntthe practice during nursing training. Only 6.6% Paediatricians, 4% caregivers and 0% nurses were aware of 'hip-safe swaddling'. Traditional swaddling of infants is a practice deeply rooted in India, born out of misbeliefs, and propagated by lack of awareness. Training in hip-safe swaddling targeted at nurses and Paediatricians would be an effective initial step in creating awareness among mothers and changing their practices.

Swaddling as a risk factor for developmental dysplasia of the hip: Perception and knowledge of family medicine and pediatric residents

Objectives: Several risk factors were associated with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH); however, the most common modifiable risk factor is swaddling. Swaddling is a common practice in Saudi Arabia with different unsafe techniques. The aim of our study is to evaluate the awareness and perception of family medicine and pediatric residents of swaddling techniques and their relations to DDH and to look for the effectiveness of an educational intervention on changing their attitude and perception regarding this topic. Methods: This cross-sectional study targeted family medicine and pediatric residents. Each of the participants received a validated questionnaire that was filled before and after a presentation by a pediatric orthopedic consultant regarding different aspects of DDH. Results: The study included 61 residents. Participants' age ranged from 25 to 30 years. There was a significant correlation between the prelecture scores and the practicing period of the physicians (P = 0.003). Results showed that participants' mean knowledge score before the intervention was 3.801 ± 2.18 (out of 8) while after the intervention increased to 6.903 ± 1.12. Conclusion: More than half of the participants lacked the knowledge about swaddling and DDH. The educational intervention significantly increased their knowledge and perception. This clearly means that first-line physicians encountering DDH patients need educational sessions on this topic to manage them safely and educate them about safe swaddling techniques.

Oligohydramnios: should it be considered a risk factor for developmental dysplasia of the hip?

Breech, family history, first born and female sex are the main risk factors described for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). Foot abnormalities and oligohydramnios have also been listed. Recent studies have discredited torticollis, multiple gestation pregnancy, mode of delivery and prematurity as risk factors. Definition of oligohydramnios in the literature is inconsistent. Our aim was to investigate the term oligohydramnios and evaluate whether it should be considered a risk factor for DDH. All live births in our institution between 2001 and 2014 were included. We identified all pregnancies classed as reduced amniotic fluid (AF) or oligohydramnios over that period. Data on DDH, breech presentation, female sex and positive family history were collected. The significance level was set to 5%. We identified 73 990 live births, 3408 pregnancies were classed as reduced AF or oligohydramnios. The incidence of DDH (Graf type IIb and higher) was 1: 1000 (75 babies, 18 bilateral). Oligohydramnios/reduced AF was found in 12 (16%) DDH babies. Breech presentation was found in 24 (32%), positive family history in 19 (25%) and female sex in 71 (94.7%). Oligohydramnios was found to be associated with a higher odds ratio (OR) for DDH [OR = 3.9, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.1-7.3] as were breech presentation (OR = 10.6, 95% CI: 6.5-17.1) and female sex (OR = 19.1, 95% CI: 7-52.4). All examined risk factors showed statistical significance (P < 0.05). A regression analysis was performed to control for interactions and confounding factors and confirmed the findings. On the basis of our findings the diagnosis of reduced AF/oligohydramnios in consecutive antenatal sonographic scans should be regarded as an independent risk factor for DDH and be considered in any future studies regarding DDH. Level of evidence: Level IV: Case series.

Risk Factor Assessment and a Ten-Year Experience of DDH Screening in a Well-Child Population.

Aim Risk based screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) with ultrasound is common. However, risk factors vary from one country to the other since data are insufficient to give clear recommendations. We aimed to evaluate the risk factors for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). Methods In this retrospective case-control study, the health records of all children, who were followed up between 2004 and 2014 at a well-child unit, were investigated for the diagnosis of DDH in Turkey. Of 9758 children, 57 children were found to have abnormal ultrasonographic findings (according to Graf classification) and these constituted the case group. As the control group, healthy 228 children who matched the case children in birth months were selected. Two groups were compared for the risk factors. Results A total of 19516 hips of 9758 children were examined for DDH. 97 hips of 57 children were found to have abnormal ultrasonographic findings. When the two groups were compared, breech presentation, multiple pregnancy, and torticollis were identified as risk factors. The female sex was also found to have a significantly high prevalence among the children in the case group. Limited hip abduction, positive Ortolani, and Barlow signs were important clinical findings in the case group. Conclusion According to our findings, breech presentation, female sex, torticollis, and multiple pregnancy were found to be the risk factors of this disorder. Infants with these risk factors should be investigated carefully for DDH.

Medico-legal examination of patients with developmental dysplasia of hip treated surgically due to late diagnosis

Aim: Physicians assessing newborns with risk factors for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) have responsibility for early diagnosis. Written records of the fulfillment of such responsibility is required in medico-legal terms. The present study aims to examine the written records of the hospitals where patients with late-diagnosed DDH were born.Material and Methods: This retrospective study examined the records of the hospitals in which 53 DDH patients aged more than nine months were born. We investigated whether the requirements for the early diagnosis of these patients were recorded in written and interviewed with the obstetricians, pediatricians and family physicians who followed these patients. They were asked about their attitudes toward giving families informational documents about DDH and explaining protective measures verbally.Results: There was no written approved record that they have been informed about the disease in any institution and indicating that the responsibilities for the early diagnosis of these patients were fulfilled. The families were given informational documents in three of five private hospitals and in one university hospital. All of physicians informed the families about the early DDH diagnosis and the things to do, verbally. Conclusion: In case of late-diagnosed DDH, the society as well as the child and the child’s family get harmed socioeconomically. Therefore, it may pose a medico-legal problem. This risk increases more in countries where newborn screening policies are not adequately implemented. In conclusion, written documents taken from families about the early diagnosis of DDH will legally protect physicians and health care organizations.

Do the risk factors for developmental dysplasia of the hip differ according to gender? A look from another perspective

The aim of the present study was to examine if there were gender differences in risk factors in 4415 infants who were evaluated through a physical examination and hip ultrasonography (USG). Physical examination of the hip and hip USG were performed on 4415 infants by the same paediatric orthopaedics specialist. Barlow and Ortolani tests were performed together with the evaluation for the limitation of abduction. Ultrasonographic hip examination was performed according to the Graf technique. The birth records of all the infants were examined, and anamneses (genetic disease, maternal age, delivery type, swaddling, multiple pregnancies, duration of gestation period, gravida, birthweight, breech presentation, oligohydramnios and family history) were obtained from the families. Any accompanying musculoskeletal (torticollis, pes equinovarus, congenital knee dislocation) abnormality was recorded. Pathological hip was determined in 149 (3.37%) of 4415 infants. In males, gestational week, family history, breech presentation, swaddling, congenital knee dislocation and limited abduction were observed to be significant for the presence of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). In females, significant factors for the presence of DDH were determined to include birthweight, gestational week, breech presentation, multiple pregnancy, accompanying oligohydramnios, torticollis, pes equinovarus and limited abduction. Risk factors for DDH can differ according to gender.

Investigating the need for routine ultrasound screening to detect developmental dysplasia of the hip in infants born with breech presentation

Breech presentation is a recognized risk factor for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). Within North America, there is a lack of consensus on screening guidelines for DDH in infants with a negative physical examination of the hips. This study evaluates the need for ultrasound screening in all breech born infants to detect DDH and whether this is influenced by gender, gestational age and mode of delivery. A retrospective chart review was conducted to identify breech born infants who underwent routine hip ultrasound to detect DDH between 2010 and 2015. Patients were grouped by physical exam and ultrasound findings and compared based on gender, gestational age and mode of delivery. Three hundred and eighteen patients were identified (191 female, 127 male; 26 preterm, 57 late preterm, 235 term; 263 caesarean section delivery, 55 vaginal delivery). Three hundred and eight patients had a negative physical exam of which 27 were diagnosed with DDH based on screening ultrasound with females predominant (P<0.05). 12.50% of females with a negative physical exam had DDH compared to 3.23% of males (P<0.05). There was no difference in the rate of DDH detected by screening ultrasound based on gestational age (P=0.94) or mode of delivery (P=0.59). The diagnosis of DDH in breech born infants by screening ultrasound in those with a negative physical exam of the hips is more predominant in females, with no apparent association with gestational age or mode of delivery. Future analyses with larger sample sizes are needed before conclusions can be made on screening protocols.