Risk Factors For Cesarean Delivery Research Articles

Maternal and Neonatal Characteristics Associated With Failed Induction of Labor in Diabetic Mothers [ID 2683497

INTRODUCTION: Uncontrolled diabetes is a risk factor for cesarean delivery. Identifying and stratifying associated risk factors for failed induction of labor (IOL) may improve counseling and intrapartum care. This study aims at determining maternal and fetal factors that would predict the occurrence of failed IOL in diabetic mothers. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of 2,172 diabetic mothers who underwent IOL at a single university medical center between January 2013 and December 2021. Maternal and neonatal characteristics were obtained. Among the studied maternal characteristics were ethnicity, age, gestational age, medical comorbidities (including preeclampsia and essential hypertension), insulin administration, parity, and health insurance type (public versus private). Statistical analysis was performed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression. A value of P<.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Our preliminary analysis showed that 567 out of 2,172 (26.1%) diabetic mothers failed IOL and delivered via cesarean pathway. Failed IOL was associated with nulliparity (P=.0001), preexisting diabetes (compared to gestational diabetes) (P=.001), control of diabetes by insulin (P=.001), maternal essential hypertension (P=.001), preeclampsia (P=.001), polyhydramnios (P=.001), prenatal diagnosis of fetal growth restriction (P=.008), and placental abnormalities (P=.027). Neonatal weight, large for gestational age, head circumference, and height were not statistically associated with failed induction of labor (all values of P>.05). Failed IOL was associated with admission to neonatal intensive care unit (P=.001), hyperbilirubinemia (P=.001), lower APGAR score at 1 minute (P=.033), longer stay in the hospital (0.001). Failed IOL was not associated with lower APGAR score at 5 minutes, lower umbilical cord pH value, neonatal readmission or maternal ethnicity (all values of P>.05). CONCLUSION: Failed IOL among diabetic mothers is associated with significant maternal and neonatal adverse outcomes. Our continued data analysis aims at assessing the role of optimal glucose control and other maternal factors in improving maternal and neonatal outcomes.

Association of Maternal Height with Mode of Delivery and Perinatal Outcome

Background: Maternal height has been for long a contributory anthropometric factor that can determine the obstetric outcome. There is always a need of a consistent, reliable, and simple risk indicator which is easy to use for preventing unnecessary complications in a country like India where often antenatal care is provided by dais in rural areas. The background of this research aims to ascertain the relationship between maternal height and mode of delivery based on other intrapartum factors which influence labor and consequent maternal and neonatal outcome. Materials and Methods: All primigravidae at term gestation (>37 weeks) with cephalic presentation on admission to labor suite with no other comorbidities were recruited in the study. Their mode of delivery, maternal outcome, along with neonatal outcome was documented. Results: Out of the 680 patients, 104 patients are considered for the short-stature group (15.29%) who were <150 cm in height. Other group comprised patients who were >150 cm in height, a total of 576 (84.71%). There was a higher incidence of induced labor in the study group (66.35%) and emergency lower-segment cesarean section done due to cephalopelvic disproportion (CPD) (60%) was also higher among the short-stature group. The incidence of normal labor (32.99%) was higher in the tall-stature group. Conclusion: Short height (<150 cm) is an independent risk factor for cesarean delivery due to CPD. Statistical correlation was found between mothers of short stature and babies being born with low birth weight. As labor is influenced by multiple factors, it is fair enough to give a trial of labor for short primigravidae except in uncommon circumstances.

The Relationship between Gestational Weight Gain and Cesarean Delivery among Patients undergoing Induction of Labor.

This study aimed to determine the impact of pregnancy weight gain above National Academy of Medicine (NAM) guidelines on cesarean delivery rates following induction. This is a secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study of patients who underwent induction at a single tertiary care center between July 2017 and July 2019. Included in the primary study were patients undergoing term (≥37 weeks) labor induction with a singleton gestation, intact membranes, and unfavorable cervical examination (Bishop score of ≤6 and cervical dilation ≤ 2 cm). Eligibility for this analysis was limited to patients with a documented prenatal body mass index (BMI) < 20 weeks' gestation. The primary exposure was gestational weight gain greater than NAM guidelines (WGGG) for a patient's initial BMI category. The primary outcome was cesarean delivery for any indication. Of 1,610 patients included in the original cohort, 1,174 (72.9%) met inclusion criteria for this analysis and 517 (44.0%) of these had weight gain above NAM guidelines. Of the entire cohort, 60.0% were Black and 52.7% had private insurance. In total, 160 patients (31%) with WGGG underwent cesarean compared with 127 patients (19.3%) without WGGG (p < 0.001), which equates to a 59% increased odds of cesarean when controlling for initial BMI category, parity, gestational diabetes, and indication for induction (Adjusted Odds Ratio [aOR] 1.58, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.17-2.12). Among only nulliparous patients, WGGG was associated with an increased odds of cesarean (26.4 vs. 38.2%, aOR 1.50, 95% CI 1.07-2.10). In multiparous patients, however, there was no difference in cesarean between those with and without WGGG (8.8 vs. 14.1%, aOR 1.85, 95% CI 0.96-3.58). This study demonstrates that weight gain above NAM guidelines is associated with more than a 50% increased odds of cesarean. Patients should be informed of this association as gestational weight gain may be a modifiable risk factor for cesarean delivery. · Weight gain above NAM guidelines was associated with a 59% increased odds of cesarean delivery.. · Nulliparous patients with weight gain above NAM guidelines are at higher risk of cesarean delivery.. · No difference in cesarean delivery among multiparous patients regardless of gestational weight gain..

Factors Associated with Cesarean Operations of Gestational Diabetic Mellitus and Diabetes Complications

Objective: To identify risk factors of cesarean delivery in pregnant women with diabetes mellitus and complications caused by gestational diabetes. Materials and Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Phatthalung Hospital. The participants consisted of pregnant women who labored at Phatthalung Hospital between 2017 and 2021. The inclusion criteria comprised women who labored from 28 to 42 weeks and had complete medical records. Patients having previous cesarean sections, cesarean section on maternal demand, and twin pregnancy were excluded. The study group was diabetic mellitus pregnant women, while non-diabetic pregnant women was generated by random numbers at ratio of 1:1 as control group. The data collected were demographic data, age, body mass index (BMI), number of gestations, parity, abortion, type of diabetic mellitus, underlying disease, route of delivery, indications for cesarean delivery, and maternal and neonatal outcomes. Results: Two thousand twelve pregnant women consisted of 1,006 pregnancies with diabetes and 1,006 non-diabetic pregnancies. Pregnant women with diabetes significantly increased the risk of cesarean section 1.42 time (95% CI 1.19 to 1.70, p&lt;0.001). The greatest indication for cesarean section of both groups was cephalopelvic disproportion, but failure for induction of labor and macrosomia were found in the study group more than in the control group. Logistic regression analysis, adjusted for age group, number of gestations, and BMI, showed that pregnancy-induced hypertension and newborn weight of 4,000 g or more were risk factors for cesarean section among diabetic pregnancies. The maternal complications of the study group were preeclampsia, indicated preterm labor, and premature rupture of membranes. The common fetal complications were macrosomia and birth asphyxia. Conclusion: Risk factors of cesarean section among pregnant women with diabetes included preeclampsia and newborn weight of 4,000 g or more. Gestational diabetes increased significantly the maternal and fetal complications. Keywords: Gestational diabetic mellitus; Cesarean section; Complications

Is COVID-19 a Risk Factor for Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy?

Objective: This study aims to assess whether COVID-19 infection during pregnancy is a risk factor for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, including gestational hypertension, preeclampsia, HELLP (hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelets) syndrome, and eclampsia. Methods: A retrospective evaluation was conducted on obstetric patients who gave birth between March 2020 and December 2021 at Augusta University Medical Center, an academic urban referral center in Augusta, GA. The patients were categorized into two groups: those who were COVID-19 positive during pregnancy and those who were COVID-19 negative. The primary outcome was the development of a hypertensive disorder of pregnancy. Secondary outcomes included preterm delivery, mode of delivery, maternal death, maternal ICU admission, NICU admission, intrauterine fetal demise/stillbirth, fetal growth restriction, and prolonged hospital stay. The association between COVID-19 status and categorical outcomes was assessed using Chi-squared and Fisher’s exact tests. Mean differences between groups were evaluated using Student’s two-sample tests. Additionally, a multinomial multiple logistic regression was performed to assess whether COVID-19 is a risk factor for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy when adjusting for potential confounding effects. Results: Out of the 2760 charts reviewed, 2426 (87.9%) met the inclusion criteria. Of those 2426 patients, 203 were COVID-positive and 2223 were COVID-negative . There were no significant differences in patient sociodemographic information between the COVID-19 positive and negative groups. After adjusting for potential confounding effects, COVID-19 was determined to be a risk factor for combined hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (OR 1.93, 95% CI 1.39-2.66) and preeclampsia specifically (OR 2.01, 95% CI 1.38-2.88). For the observed secondary outcomes, COVID-19 infection during pregnancy was associated with an increased risk of cesarean delivery (p = 0.046), maternal ICU admission (p = 0.008), and prolonged hospital stay (p &lt; 0.001). Conclusion: The findings of this study suggest that COVID-19 infection during pregnancy is linked to an increased risk of developing preeclampsia. COVID-19 was not a statistically significant risk factor for gestational hypertension when controlling for confounding effects. The study was unable to draw conclusions about more severe hypertensive conditions of pregnancy (HELLP, Eclampsia), likely due to their low prevalence in the study sample. COVID-19 was shown to be a risk factor for cesarean delivery, prolonged hospital stay, and maternal ICU admission in secondary outcome analysis. This research contributes to existing knowledge by examining the association between COVID-19 and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy during a period encompassing multiple strains of the COVID-19 virus.

Obstetric and perinatal outcome in short-stature patients.

Scarce data exist regarding obstetric complications of short-stature patients. This study aimed to investigate obstetric and perinatal outcomes in women with short stature; specifically, to investigate whether short-stature patients are at an increased risk for cesarean delivery. A population-based cohort study was conducted, including all singletons born between the years 1991 and 2021 at a tertiary medical center. Obstetric and perinatal outcomes of short-stature patients were compared with those of non-short patients. A generalized estimation equation binary logistic model was constructed to adjust for confounders and maternal recurrence in the cohort. The study population included 356 356 parturient; among them, 14 035 (3.9%) were short-stature patients. Short-stature patients had significantly higher rates of cesarean delivery (20.7% vs 13.7%, odds ratio = 1.64, 95% confidence interval 1.57-1.71, P < 0.001), induction of labor, pathologic presentations, prolonged second stage of labor, non-reassuring fetal monitoring, and meconium-stained amniotic fluid. Newborns of short-stature patients had a significantly higher risk of being small for gestational age as compared with those of non-short patients. In the generalized estimation equation models, the association between short stature and risk of cesarean delivery remained significant (adjusted odds ratio = 1.32, 95% confidence interval 1.27-1.38, P < 0.001), as well as the risk of small for gestational age newborns (adjusted odds ratio = 1.51, 95% confidence interval 1.40-1.63, P < 0.001), but not for the other adverse outcomes. Maternal short stature is an independent risk factor for cesarean delivery and is associated with small for gestational age newborns.

Induction of Labor on Maternal Request: Do Not Refuse This Option to Women

Objective: To describe perinatal outcomes in a population of labour induction on maternal request, whatever the obstetrical conditions. Methods: This retrospective single-centre study included all women who underwent labour induction on maternal request between January 2019 and May 2020. The primary outcome was perinatal outcomes: data about maternal and fetal morbidity were collected. The secondary outcome was the cesarean rate. Data were compared according to the delivery outcome (“vaginal delivery” Vs “cesarean section” group) to identify risk factors for cesarean delivery. Multivariate analysis was performed by adjusting for confounding factors such as Bishop score, prior cesarean section, parity, BMI, maternal, fetal presentation, gestational age, method of ripening, and the number of ripening’s stages needed. Results: We included 86 women. There was no risk factor for poor perinatal outcomes. Vaginal delivery occurs in 96,3 % (n=78/86) of all women. In primiparous women and the “prior cesarean-section group”, this rate was 92,9% and 76,9%, respectively. We didn’t find any statistical difference between the “vaginal delivery” and “cesarean section” groups. Conclusion: Induction of labour on maternal request should be widely accepted regarding the low risk of cesarean section and the absence of predictive risk factor of it.

Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes of Elective Induction of Labor at 39 or More Weeks: A Prospective, Observational Study.

The purpose of our study is to compare the maternal and neonatal outcomes of induction of labor (IOL) versus expectant management at 39 weeks of gestation. We conducted a single-centered, prospective, observational study of nulliparous singleton women at 39 weeks or more. We compared the maternal and perinatal outcomes. Of 408 nulliparous women, 132 women were IOL group and 276 women were expectant management group. IOL and expectant group had similar cesarean delivery rate (18.2% vs. 15.9%, p = 0.570). The delivery time from admission was longer in IOL group (834 ± 527 vs. 717 ± 469 min, p = 0.040). The IOL group was less likely to have Apgar score at 5 min < 7 than in expectant group (0.8% vs. 5.4%, p = 0.023). Multivariate analysis showed that IOL at 39 weeks was not an independent risk factor for cesarean delivery (relative risk 0.64, 95% confidence interval: 0.28−1.45, p = 0.280). Maternal and neonatal adverse outcomes, including cesarean delivery rate, were similar to women in IOL at 39 weeks of gestation compared to expectant management in nulliparous women. IOL at 39 weeks of gestation could be recommended even when the indication of IOL is not definite.

The Association of Antenatal Depression and Cesarean Delivery among First-Time Parturients: A Population-Based Study.

Antenatal depression (AD) has been considered a risk factor for cesarean delivery (CD); however, the supporting data are inconsistent. We used a large, nationally representative dataset to evaluate whether there is an association between AD and CD among women delivering for the first time. We utilized the 2016 to 2019 Multistate Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) from the Centers for Disease Control. First-time parturients who reported depression in the 3 months prior to or at any point during their recent pregnancy were compared with those who did not. The mode of delivery was obtained through the birth certificate. Maternal demographics, pregnancy characteristics, and delivery characteristics were compared by the report of AD using bivariable analyses. Population-weighted multivariable regression was performed, adjusting for maternal age, race/ethnicity, insurance, pregnancy complications, preterm birth, and body mass index (BMI). Of the 61,605 people who met the inclusion criteria, 18.3% (n = 11,896) reported AD and 29.8% (n = 19,892) underwent CD. Parturients with AD were younger, more likely to be non-Hispanic white, publicly insured, use tobacco in pregnancy, deliver earlier, have lower levels of education, higher BMIs, and more medical comorbidities (hypertension and diabetes). After adjustment for these differences, there was no difference in risk of CD between those with AD compared with those without (adjusted odds ratio: 1.04; 95% confidence interval: 0.97-1.13). In a large, population-weighted, nationally representative sample of first-time parturients, there was no association between AD and CD. · Antenatal depression is increasingly common and has multiple known morbidities.. · Prior data on antenatal depression and cesarean delivery are mixed.. · We found no association between depression and cesarean delivery..

Is gestational age at term a risk factor for ongoing pregnancies in nulliparous women: A prospective cohort study

The results of American observational studies and 1 large, randomized trial show that elective induction of labor among nulliparous women can reduce cesarean delivery rates and suggest that gestational age at delivery may be a risk factor for cesarean delivery in pregnancies managed expectantly. However, data on the risk of cesarean delivery at term in ongoing pregnancies are sparse, especially in high-income countries, and further information is needed to explore the external validity of these previous studies. This study aimed to evaluate the risk of cesarean delivery for each gestational week of ongoing pregnancy in nulliparous women with a singleton fetus in the cephalic presentation at term in a French population. This retrospective study was conducted in a perinatal network of 10 maternity units from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2017, and included all nulliparous women with a singleton fetus in the cephalic presentation who gave birth at term (≥37 0/7 weeks of gestation). From the start of term (37 completed weeks) and at the start of each subsequent week of completed gestation (each week + 0 days), ongoing pregnancy was defined as that of a woman who was still pregnant and who gave birth at any time after that date. For each week of gestation for these ongoing pregnancies, the cesarean delivery rate was defined as the number of cesarean deliveries performed in each ongoing pregnancy group divided by the number of women in this group. Separate models for each week of gestation, adjusted by maternal characteristics and hospital status, were used to compare the cesarean delivery risk between ongoing pregnancies and those delivered the preceding week. The same methods were applied to subgroups defined according to the mode of labor onset. Odds ratios were calculated after adjusting for maternal age and educational level, presence of severe preeclampsia, and maternity unit status. The study included 11,308 nulliparous women, 2544 (22.5%) of whom had a cesarean delivery. These rates remained stable for ongoing pregnancies at 37 0/7, 38 0/7, and 39 0/7 weeks of gestation; the rates were 22.5% (95% confidence interval, 21.7-23.2), 22.6% (95% confidence interval, 21.8-23.3); and 22.7% (95% confidence interval, 21.9-23.6), respectively. The risk of cesarean delivery started to increase in ongoing pregnancies at 40 0/7 weeks of gestation (24.3%; 95% confidence interval, 23.1-25.4) and especially at 41 0/7 weeks of gestation (30.7%; 95% confidence interval, 28.9-32.5). Similar trends were also shown for all modes of labor onset and in every maternity unit. In univariate and multivariate analyses, ongoing pregnancy at or beyond 40 0/7 weeks of gestation was associated with a higher risk of cesarean delivery than pregnancy delivered the previous week: 24.3% of ongoing pregnancies at 40 0/7 weeks of gestation vs 19.9% of deliveries between 39 0/7 weeks of gestation and 39 6/7 weeks of gestation. The odds ratios were 1.28 (95% confidence interval, 1.15-1.44) or 30.4% of ongoing pregnancies at 41 0/7 weeks of gestation vs 1.73 (95% confidence interval, 1.51-1.96) or 19.6% of deliveries between 40 0/7 weeks of gestation and 40 6/7 weeks of gestation. Cesarean delivery rates increased starting at 40 0/7 weeks of gestation in ongoing pregnancies regardless of the mode of labor onset.

OBSTETRIC OUTCOMES OF FERTILITY PATIENTS WITH PELVIC PAIN DISORDERS

Previous research has shown vaginismus to be an independent risk factor for cesarean delivery (CD).1 CD is associated with increased maternal and neonatal morbidity compared with vaginal deliveries; despite this, the rate of CD continues to rise. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists has proposed strategies to help reduce the rate of CD. Most of which focus on the peripartum and intrapartum periods. Therefore, an opportunity exists for reproductive endocrinology and infertility (REI) providers to identify patients at risk for CD based on a history of pelvic pain disorders (PPDs).

Class III obesity is an independent risk factor for unsuccessful induction of labor

BACKGROUNDAlthough obesity is a known risk factor for cesarean delivery, there is a paucity of data on the course of induction of labor in these patients.OBJECTIVEWith emerging data on the safety of 39-week inductions, we aimed to: (1) determine if Class III obesity, including morbid obesity, is an independent risk factor for nonachievement of complete dilation and vaginal delivery after induction of labor, (2) evaluate the characteristics of the induction of labor course and immediate complications, and (3) evaluate the number of induction agents necessary to be associated with vaginal deliveries. We hypothesized that as body mass index increased, it would take longer to achieve complete cervical dilation, more induction agents would be required, and there would be a higher rate of cesarean delivery.STUDY DESIGNThis was a retrospective cohort study of singleton gestations undergoing induction of labor from 2013 to 2020 at a single center. Study groups were defined as nonobese (body mass index <30 kg/m2), non-Class III obesity (body mass index of 30–39.9 kg/m2), and Class III obesity (body mass index ≥40 kg/m2). The primary outcome was achievement of complete cervical dilation. Secondary outcomes included time from start of induction to complete dilation, cesarean delivery rates, doses of misoprostol used, combination of induction agents used, and incidence of chorioamnionitis and postpartum hemorrhage. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to estimate risks. A secondary analysis was performed on nulliparous patients.RESULTSA total of 3046 individuals met the inclusion criteria. As body mass index increased, the indications for induction were more likely to be maternal. Rate of achievement of complete dilation decreased with increasing body mass index (973 [88.5%] in the body mass index <30 group vs 455 [70.8%] in the body mass index ≥40 group; adjusted odds ratio, 0.3; 95% confidence interval, 0.2–0.4). The rate of cesarean delivery also increased (149 [13.5%] in the body mass index <30 group vs 207 [30.9%] in the body mass index ≥40 group; adjusted odds ratio, 3.2; 95% confidence interval, 2.5–4.2), as did the time to complete dilation (15.3 hours in the body mass index <30 group vs 18.8 hours in the body mass index ≥40 group; P<.001). Morbidly obese patients required higher doses and more types of induction agents. Misoprostol was used as the sole induction agent in 362 (35.1%) of patients in the body mass index <30 group vs 160 (25.4%) of patients in the body mass index ≥40 group (adjusted odds ratio, 0.6; 95% confidence interval, 0.5–0.8). In the body mass index ≥40 group, a greater number required a combination of misoprostol, mechanical ripening, and oxytocin for induction (147 [14.3%] in the body mass index <30 group vs 158 [25.0%] in the body mass index ≥40 group; adjusted odds ratio, 1.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.3–2.3). For nulliparous patients, the rate of cesarean delivery was significantly higher with increasing body mass index (118 [18.3%] in the body mass index <30 group and 157 [48.2%] in the body mass index ≥40 group; P<.001), with 5 more hours spent in labor (18.3 hours in the body mass index <30 group vs 23.3 hours in the body mass index ≥40 group; P<.001). Nulliparous patients were also more likely to require multiple induction agents (122 [20.3%] for body mass index <30 vs 108 [33.6%] for body mass index ≥40; P<.001).CONCLUSIONClass III obesity is an independent risk factor for nonachievement of complete dilation and vaginal delivery following induction of labor. Furthermore, inductions in these patients require more time and are more likely to require multiple agents.

Study of the Risk Factors for Cesarean Delivery among Pregnant Women Requiring Induction of Labor in a Tertiary Care Institute

Study of the Risk Factors for Cesarean Delivery among Pregnant Women Requiring Induction of Labor in a Tertiary Care Institute

Maternal Obesity as a Risk Factor for Caesarean Delivery in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Systematic Review.

Background: Maternal obesity is associated with several adverse reproductive outcomes. It is a growing public health burden in sub-Saharan Africa, a region with low resources and capacity to care for the large, affected population. Objectives: To assess the evidence of maternal obesity as a risk factor for caesarean delivery in women in sub-Saharan Africa. Methods: A systematic review of relevant original articles using PubMed, MEDLINE, and CINAHL was performed. Google Scholar and the reference lists of relevant systematic reviews and meta-analyses were also searched for other eligible studies. Observational studies assessing maternal body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m2 before or during gestation and caesarean delivery as birth outcome were included. Results: All 17 studies were published between 2009 and 2021 and included 227,675 (236–153,102) participants. The prevalence of maternal obesity ranged from 3.9 to 44%. All except two studies (88%) indicated an association of obesity and risk of caesarean delivery in pregnant women in sub-Saharan Africa. Overweight/obese women had up to 4-fold increased risk of caesarean delivery compared to normal weight women. Three studies also reported a direct relationship between morbid obesity and prevalence of caesarean delivery in the sub-region. The risk of caesarean delivery appears to increase with increasing BMI e.g., >5 times in women with BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2 than in normal weight women. Conclusions: In sub-Saharan Africa, increased BMI in pregnancy is a risk factor for subsequent caesarean delivery. The risk of caesarean delivery appears to increase with increasing BMI. A robust meta-analysis and other patho-mechanistic studies can be conducted to confirm causal association. Culturally appropriate weight management and nutritional interventions should be implemented to reduce the incidence of obesity-induced caesarean delivery in sub-Saharan Africa.

Highest economic status increases risk of cesarean section in women of childbearing age

BACKGROUNDCesarean section (CS) rates that are higher than the WHO recommendation may pose morbidity and mortality risks for both mother and child. In recent years, the number of CS deliveries has been increasing in developed and developing countries. The aim of the present study was to determine the rate of CS delivery and socioeconomic and demographic factors as risk factors of cesarean delivery in women of childbearing age. METHODSThis cross-sectional study used data from the 2017 Indonesian Health Demographic Survey (IDHS). The research subjects were 14,724 women of childbearing age aged 15-49 years who had given birth and met the inclusion criteria. The rate of CS was determined and the associations between independent and dependent variables were explored using logistic regression. RESULTSThe CS rate was 17.9%. Variables that had a significant relationship with cesarean delivery were geographic region, economic status, occupation, education, birth attendant, insurance ownership and antenatal care visits. The most dominant influencing variable was the highest economic status (OR 3.566; 95% CI: 2.857-4.452). Respondents with the highest economic status had a 3.5 times greater risk of having a cesarean delivery than subjects with the lowest economic status after controlling for the other variables. CONCLUSIONThis study demonstrated that the highest economic status increased the risk of CS delivery in women of childbearing age. The current epidemiological findings and evidence suggest adopting and implementing some strict guidelines in the health system to avoid unnecessary delivery by CS.

Pre-Pregnancy Physical Fitness, Body Mass Index and Gestational Weight Gain as Risk Factors for Cesarean Delivery: A Study of Active Duty Women.

The World Health Organization considers the optimal rate of delivery by Cesarean among healthy nulliparous women to be <15%. In 2020, the rate of primary Cesarean delivery (CD) in the US among nulliparous women with singleton, vertex pregnancies was 26%. An enhanced understanding of factors associated with women undergoing CD may assist in reducing this rate. One potential factor is the level of physical fitness in women before pregnancy. Active duty (AD) soldiers provide a cohort of women who begin pregnancy while actively pursuing physical fitness. The research team sought to assess the effects of pre-pregnancy physical fitness of AD soldiers as measured by the Army Physical Fitness Test (APFT) on the incidence of CD in AD women, in addition to examining known demographic and pregnancy risk factors in this cohort. We conducted a retrospective study of healthy AD nulliparous women who delivered their singleton pregnancy of >32 weeks at a tertiary medical center between 2011 and 2016. Soldiers undergoing non-labored CD were excluded. Demographics, pre-pregnancy APFT results, antepartum and labor and delivery data were collected from the Digital Training Management System, the outpatient, and inpatient medical records respectively. Weight gain in pregnancy was assessed using the Institute of Medicine Guidelines for pregnancy. Fisher's exact tests and chi-squared tests assessed associations between categorical outcomes, and unpaired t-tests assessed differences in APFT scores between women who underwent CD vs. vaginal delivery. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to assess for independent risk factors among all collected variables. The protocol was approved by the Regional Health Command-Pacific Institutional Review Board. Five-hundred-and-twenty-three women delivering singleton pregnancies between 2011 and 2016 were reviewed for this study. Three-hundred ninety women met inclusion criteria: 316 in the vaginal delivery cohort, and 74 in the CD cohort, with a CD rate of 19%. Twenty non-labored CDs were excluded. Neither total APFT performance nor performance on the individual push-up, sit-up or run events in the 15 months prior to pregnancy was associated with mode of delivery. Excessive gestational weight gain (EWG) and neonatal birth weight were the only two factors independently associated with an increased rate of cesarean delivery. Women who had excessive gestational weight gain, were twice as likely to undergo CD as those who had adequate or insufficient weight gain (24% vs. 12%, p = 0.004). Soldiers delivering a neonate ≥4,000 g were 2.8 times as likely to undergo CD as those delivering a neonate <4,000 g (47% vs. 17%, p < 0.001). Age, race, and rank, a surrogate marker for socioeconomic status, were not associated with mode of delivery. Pre-pregnancy fitness levels as measured by the APFT among healthy physically active nulliparous AD women showed no association with the incidence of labored CD. EWG is one modifiable factor which potentially increases the risk for CD in this cohort and has been documented as a risk factor in a recent metanalysis (RR-1.3). Counseling on appropriate weight gain in pregnancy may be the most effective way to reduce the rate of CD among this population of healthy and physically active women.

Association between antenatal depression and cesarean delivery among nulliparous parturients

Antenatal depression is frequently cited as a risk factor for cesarean delivery (CD), however the supporting data are mixed and of low-quality. We sought to use a large, nationally representative dataset to establish if there was an association between antenatal depression and CD among nulliparous parturients in the United States.

The impact of levothyroxine exposure on delivery outcome in hypothyroid pregnant women (PETAL study): A five-year retrospective cohort study.

Hypothyroidism affects 3% of pregnant women, and to date, no studies have addressed the impact levothyroxine-treated hypothyroidism on delivery outcome. This retrospective cohort study was conducted among 750 women with a singleton pregnancy who gave birth between 2015 and 2019. Delivery modes were compared between 250 hypothyroid women exposed to levothyroxine and 500 euthyroid control women. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of levothyroxine exposure on delivery outcome. Multiple logistic regression showed no significant association between exposure to levothyroxine and the overall rate of caesarean delivery (aOR 1.1; 95% CI 0.8 to 1.6). Mean TSH concentrations were significantly higher throughout the pregnancy in hypothyroid women despite levothyroxine treatment. Maternal and neonatal outcomes in both groups were not different. Hypothyroidism treated with levothyroxine during pregnancy according to local guidelines is not a significant risk factor for caesarean delivery.

A Multistate Decomposition Analysis of Cesarean Rate Variations, Associated Health Outcomes, and Financial Implications in the United States.

Cesarean rates vary widely across the U.S. states; however, little is known about the causes and implications associated with these variations. The objectives of this study were to quantify the contribution of the clinical and nonclinical factors in explaining the difference in cesarean rates across states and to investigate the associated health outcome of cesarean variations. Using the Hospital Cost and Utilization Project State Inpatient Databases, this retrospective study included all nonfederal hospital births from Wisconsin, Florida, and New York. A nonlinear extension of the Oaxaca-Blinder method was used to decompose the contributions of differences in characteristics to cesarean variations between these states. The risk factors for cesarean delivery were identified using separate multivariable logistic regression analysis for each State. The difference in clinical and nonclinical factors explained a substantial (~46.57-65.45%) proportion of cesarean variations between U.S. states. The major contributors of variation were patient demographics, previous cesareans, hospital markup ratios, and social determinants of health. Cesarean delivery was significantly associated with higher postpartum readmissions and unplanned emergency department visits, greater lengths of stay, and hospital costs across all states. Although a proportion of variations in cesarean rates can be explained by the differences in risk factors, the remaining unexplained variations suggest differences in practice patterns and imply potential quality concerns. Since nonclinical factors are likely to play an important role in cesarean variation, we recommend targeted initiatives increasing access to maternal care and improving maternal health literacy. · Cesarean rates vary widely almost two folds within U.S. states.. · The difference in risk factors explained substantial (~46.57-65.45%) of the cesarean variations.. · Mother race, hospital factors, and social determinants comprised major proportion of explained variation.. · Adverse outcomes and increased expenditures were associated with cesarean than vaginal delivery.. · Significant potential cost savings for Medicaid if the unnecessary cesarean deliveries are reduced..

Indications, Outcome and Risk Factors of Cesarean Delivery Among Pregnant Women Utilizing Delivery Services at Selected Public Health Institutions, Oromia Region, South West Ethiopia.

BackgroundApproximately 10% of deliveries are considered as high risk, which may require cesarean section. Besides, a rise in cesarean section delivery is a real public health concern; cesareans are costly and carry 8–12 and 8 times higher feto-maternal morbidity and mortality, respectively, as compared to vaginal delivery. Like in other countries where unnecessary cesarean delivery is performed, it is also rising in our country, posing potential risk to the mothers and their newborns.ObjectiveTo assess the indications and outcome of cesarean section delivery among pregnant women utilizing delivery services in selected hospitals.MethodsA case–control study design was used among 488 randomly selected pregnant women attending delivery services in Bedelle and Mettu-Kharl Hospitals. Data were collected by interviewer-administered questionnaire and entered into EPI-data version 3.1 and exported to SPSS version 20 for cleaning and analyses. Binary logistic regression analysis was used to control for possible confounders. Association was declared at 95% CI and P-value <0.05 to assess the association between dependent and independent variables. Variables with P-values <0.05 at bivariate analysis were entered to final logistic regression model.ResultsNearly 30% and 24.6% of fetuses had been exposed to unfavorable outcome among those delivered following cesarean and vaginal delivery, respectively. The mean age of study participants was 25.79 (SD 6.76) for mothers who underwent cesarean delivery and 24.76 (SD 4.956) for their counterparts. Unfavorable maternal outcome was experienced by 20.5% and 14.7% of pregnant women who gave birth by cesarean and vaginal delivery, respectively. Those not having antenatal care follow-up were five times more likely to encounter unfavorable outcome than attendees (AOR 5.22, 95% CI 1.85–14.69), while mothers of newborns with low 5th minute Apgar score were 3 times (AOR 2.96, 95% CI 1.07, 8.16), multi-parity 7 times (AOR 7.22, 95% CI 1.45, 36.05) and rural residence were 1.29 times (AOR 1.29, 95% CI 5.09, 12.88) more likely to develop unfavorable feto-maternal outcome.ConclusionVaginal delivery results in more favorable feto-maternal outcomes than does cesarean delivery.