Risk Factors For Anastomotic Leakage Research Articles

Gastric conduit reconstruction after esophagectomy.

A high risk of complications still accompanies gastric conduit reconstruction after esophagectomy. In this narrative review, we summarize the technological progress and the problems of gastric conduit reconstruction after esophagectomy. Several types of gastric conduits exist, including the whole stomach and the narrow gastric tube. The clinical outcomes are similar between the two types of conduits. Sufficient blood supply to the conduit is mandatory for a successful esophageal reconstruction. Recently, due to the availability of equipment and its convenience, indocyanine green angiography has been rapidly spreading. When the blood perfusion of the planning anastomotic site is insufficient, several techniques, such as the Kocher maneuver, pedunculated gastric tube with duodenal transection, and additional microvascular anastomosis, exist to decrease the risk of anastomotic failure. There are two different anastomotic sites, cervical and thoracic, and mainly two reconstructive routes, retrosternal and posterior mediastinal routes. Meta-analyses showed no significant difference in outcomes between the anastomotic sites as well as the reconstructive routes. Anastomotic techniques include hand-sewn, circular, and linear stapling. Anastomoses using linear stapling is advantageous in decreasing anastomosis-related complications. Arteriosclerosis and poorly controlled diabetes are the risk factors for anastomotic leakage, while a narrow upper mediastinal space and a damaged stomach predict leakage. Although standardization among the institutional team members is essential to decrease anastomotic complications, surgeons should learn several technical options for predictable or unpredictable intraoperative situations.

Risk factors for anastomotic leakage in colonic procedures within an ERAS-protocol. A retrospective cohort study from the Swedish part of the international ERAS-database.

Research on anastomotic leakage (AL) in colonic procedures within an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol has not yet been conducted. The aim of this study was to identify risk factors for AL after colonic surgery. The study included all consecutively recorded patients operated with colonic resection surgery in the Swedish part of the international ERAS® Interactive Audit System (EIAS) between September 2009 and June 2022. The cohort was analyzed and evaluated regarding risk factors for AL. Altogether 10,632 patients were included, 10,219 were without AL and 413 (3.9%) were with AL. After adjusted analysis, male sex (4.6% AL), OR: 1.49; 95% CI (1.16-1.90), obesity (4.8% AL), OR: 1.62; 95% CI (1.18-2.24), previous surgery (4.4% AL), OR: 1.45; 95% CI (1.14-1.86), open surgery (4.4% AL), OR: 1.36; 95% CI (1.02-1.83), anastomosis between small bowel and rectum (13.1% AL), OR: 3.97; 95% CI (2.23-7.10), stapled anastomosis (5.3% AL), OR: 2.46; 95% CI (1.79-3.38), inhalation anesthesia (4.2% AL), OR: 1.80; 95% CI (1.26-2.57), and conversion to open surgery (5.5% AL), OR 1.49; 95% CI (1.02-2.19) were significant risk factors for AL. Although pre and intraoperative compliance to the ERAS-protocol was similar, excess of fluids day 0 was an independent predictor for AL. Male sex, obesity, previous surgery, open surgery, stapled anastomotic technique, anastomosis between small bowel and rectum, inhalation anesthesia, conversion to open surgery, and among ERAS interventions, excess of fluids day 0, were significant risk factors for AL.

Preoperative risk factors for anastomotic leak after esophagectomy with gastric reconstruction: A 6-year national surgical quality improvement (NSQIP) database analysis

BackgroundAnastomotic leak is a serious complication after esophagectomy that has been associated with worse outcomes. However, identifying patients at increased risk for anastomotic leak remains challenging. MethodsPatients were included from the 2016 to 2021 National Surgical Quality Improvement Project database who underwent elective esophagectomy with gastric reconstruction for cancer. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to identify risk factors associated with anastomotic leak. ResultsA total of 4,331 patients were included in the study, of whom 647 patients experienced anastomotic leak (14.9%). Multivariable logistic regression revealed higher odds of anastomotic leak with smoking (adjusted odds ratio 1.24, confidence interval 1.02–1.51, P = .031), modified frailty index-5 score of 1 (adjusted odds ratio 1.44, confidence interval 1.19–1.75, P = .002) or 2 (adjusted odds ratio 1.52, confidence interval 1.19-1.94, P = .000), and a McKeown esophagectomy (adjusted odds ratio 1.44, confidence interval 1.16–1.80, P = .001). Each 1,000/μL increase in white blood cell count was associated with a 7% increase in odds of anastomotic leak (adjusted odds ratio 1.07, confidence interval 1.03–1.10, P = .0005). Higher platelet counts were slightly protective, and each 10,000/ μL increase in platelet count was associated with 2% reduced odds of anastomotic leak (adjusted odds ratio 0.98, confidence interval 0.97–0.99, P = .001). ConclusionIn this study, smoking status, frailty index, white blood cell count, McKeown esophagectomy, and platelet counts were all associated with the occurrence of anastomotic leak. These results can help to inform surgeons and patients of the true risk of developing anastomotic leak and potentially improve outcomes by providing evidence to improve preoperative characteristics, such as frailty.

Perioperative Considerations for the Surgical Treatment of Crohn's Disease with Discussion on Surgical Antibiotics Practices and Impact on the Gut Microbiome.

Crohn's disease, a chronic inflammatory process of the gastrointestinal tract defined by flares and periods of remission, is increasing in incidence. Despite advances in multimodal medical therapy, disease progression often necessitates multiple operations with high morbidity. The inability to treat Crohn's disease successfully is likely in part because the etiopathogenesis is not completely understood; however, recent research suggests the gut microbiome plays a critical role. How traditional perioperative management, including bowel preparation and preoperative antibiotics, further changes the microbiome and affects outcomes is not well described, especially in Crohn's patients, who are unique given their immunosuppression and baseline dysbiosis. This paper aims to outline current knowledge regarding perioperative management of Crohn's disease, the evolving role of gut dysbiosis, and how the microbiome can guide perioperative considerations with special attention to perioperative antibiotics as well as treatment of Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis. In conclusion, dysbiosis is common in Crohn's patients and may be exacerbated by malnutrition, steroids, narcotic use, diarrhea, and perioperative antibiotics. Dysbiosis is also a major risk factor for anastomotic leak, and special consideration should be given to limiting factors that further perturb the gut microbiota in the perioperative period.

Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection for obese patients with rectal cancer.

We aimed to analyze the risk factors for anastomotic leakage (AL) after low anterior resection (LAR) in obese patients (body mass index [BMI] ≥ 25kg/m2) with rectal cancer. Data were collected from four hundred two obese patients who underwent LAR for rectal cancer in 51 institutions. Forty-six (11.4%) patients had clinical AL. The median BMI (27kg/m2) did not differ between the AL and non-AL groups. In the AL group, comorbid respiratory disease was more common (p = 0.025), and the median tumor size was larger (p = 0.002). The incidence of AL was 11.5% in the open surgery subgroup and 11.4% in the laparoscopic surgery subgroup. Among the patients who underwent open surgery, the AL group showed a male predominance (p = 0.04) in the univariate analysis, but it was not statistically significant in the multivariate analysis. Among the patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery, the AL group included a higher proportion of patients with comorbid respiratory disease (p = 0.003) and larger tumors (p = 0.007). Comorbid respiratory disease and tumor size were risk factors for AL in obese patients with rectal cancer. Careful perioperative respiratory management and appropriate selection of surgical procedures are required for obese rectal cancer patients with respiratory diseases.

Influential Factors Affecting Intestinal Anastomotic Leakage and Their Predictive Significance

Background: The occurrence of anastomotic leakage following intestinal surgery stands as a significant contributor to postoperative complications and fatalities. This prospective study was conducted with the aim of assessing different factors associated with the risk of anastomotic leakage. Methods: This study was carried out within the Department of Surgery over the course of one year. It encompassed patients who underwent intestinal anastomosis, whether in emergency situations or as part of routine surgical procedures. The study encompassed a total of 150 patients. Results: Anastomotic leakage was identified in 18.02% of cases, with a higher incidence among males and individuals from a lower socioeconomic background. However, age, gender, and socioeconomic status were not found to be significant risk factors for anastomotic leakage. The incidence of leaks was elevated in patients with chronic illnesses such as malignancy, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), diabetes mellitus (DM), and those on chronic corticosteroid therapy. Additionally, malnourished patients and those with sepsis, as indicated by their blood investigation reports, had a notably higher leak rate. After conducting logistic regression analysis, several independent predictors for anastomotic leaks were identified, including peritonitis (\(p< 0.05;\) odds ratio \(2.156\)), bowel obstructions (\(p< 0.05\); odds ratio \(2.864\)), receiving more than 2 units of blood transfusion (\(p< 0.05\); odds ratio \(2.334\)), serum albumin levels \(< 3.0\) gm/dL (\(p< 0.001\); odds ratio \(8.873\)), corticosteroid therapy (\(p< 0.001\); odds ratio \(4.877\)), serum creatinine levels \(>1.2\) mg/dL (\(p< 0.001\); odds ratio 11.785), surgery duration exceeding 4 hours (\(p< 0.01\); odds ratio 3.0251), and ASA Grading (III & IV) (\(p< 0.01\); odds ratio 3.707). Conclusion: This study has successfully identified key risk factors that influence the occurrence of anastomotic leakage. The findings from this research are expected to be valuable in efforts to mitigate the incidence of anastomotic leakage following surgery.

Nomogram prediction model of cervical anastomotic leakage after esophageal cancer surgery

Objective: To retrospectively analyze the risk factors of anastomotic leakage in the neck after esophageal cancer and establish a nomogram prediction model that can accurately predict the occurrence of anastomotic leakage in the neck of the patient. Methods: The study retrospectively analyzed 702 patients who underwent radical esophageal cancer surgery between January 2010 and May 2015 at Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College. A multivariate logistic regression model was used to determine the risk factors for neck anastomotic leak, and a nomogram model was constructed, internal validation methods were used to evaluate and verify the predictive effectiveness of the nomogram. Results: There were 702 patients in the whole group, 492 in the training group and 210 in the validation group. The incidence of postoperative cervical anastomotic leak was 16.1% (79/492) in 492 patients with esophageal cancer in the training group. Multifactorial analysis revealed calcification of the descending aorta (OR=2.12, 95% CI: 1.14, 3.94, P=0.018), calcification of the celiac artery (OR=2.29, 95% CI: 1.13, 4.64, P=0.022), peripheral vascular disease (OR=5.50, 95% CI: 1.64, 18.40, P=0.006), postoperative ventilator-assisted breathing (OR=5.33, 95% CI: 1.83, 15.56, P=0.002), pleural effusion or septic chest (OR=3.08, 95% CI: 1.11, 8.55, P=0.031), incisional fat liquefaction and infection (OR=3.49, 95% CI: 1.68, 7.27, P=0.001) were independent risk factors for the development of cervical anastomotic leak after esophageal cancer surgery. The results of the nomogram prediction model showed that the consistency indices of the training and external validation groups were 0.73 and 0.74, respectively (P<0.001), suggesting that the prediction model has good predictive efficacy. Conclusion: The nomogram prediction model can intuitively predict the incidence of postoperative cervical anastomotic leakage in patients with high prediction accuracy, which can help provide a clinical basis for preventing cervical anastomotic leak and individualized treatment of patients.

Blood flow ratio in the gastric conduit measured by laser Doppler flowmetry: A predictor of anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy.

Anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy is a common complication. Laser Doppler flowmetry (LDF) can quantitatively evaluate the blood flow in the gastric conduit. A total of 326 patients who underwent thoracoscopic/robot-assisted esophagectomy followed by gastric conduit reconstruction and end-to-side anastomosis were enrolled. We divided the gastric conduit into zones I (dominated by the right gastroepiploic vessels), II (dominated by the left gastroepiploic vessels), and III (perfused with short gastric vessels). Before pulling up the gastric conduit to the neck, LDF values were measured at the pylorus, the border between zones I and II (zone I/II), the border between zones II and III (zone II/III), and the gastric conduit tip (tip). The blood flow ratio was calculated as the LDF value divided by the LDF value at the pylorus. Anastomotic leakage developed in 32 of 326 patients. Leakage was significantly associated with the blood flow ratio at the tip (p < 0.001), but not at zone I/II, zone II/III, and the anastomotic site. The receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis identified an anastomotic leakage cutoff ratio of 0.41 (at the tip). A multivariate Cox analysis showed that a blood flow ratio <0.41 at the tip was an independent risk factor for anastomotic leakage (p < 0.001). Anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy was significantly associated with the blood flow ratio at the tip of the gastric conduit. Preservation of the blood supply to the tip via the gastric wall might contribute to a decreased incidence of anastomotic leakage.

Risk factors for anastomotic leak and postoperative morbidity after right hemicolectomy for colon cancer: results from a prospective, multi-centre, snapshot study in China.

Right hemicolectomy is the standard treatment for right-sided colon cancer. There is variation in the technical aspects of performing right hemicolectomy as well as in short-term outcomes. It is therefore necessary to explore best clinical practice following right hemicolectomy in expert centres. This snapshot study of right hemicolectomy for colon cancer in China was a prospective, multicentre cohort study in which 52 tertiary hospitals participated. Eligible patients with stage I-III right-sided colon cancer who underwent elective right hemicolectomy were consecutively enrolled in all centres over 10 months. The primary endpoint was the incidence of postoperative 30-day anastomotic leak. Of the 1854 patients, 89.9 per cent underwent laparoscopic surgery and 52.3 per cent underwent D3 lymph node dissection. The overall 30-day morbidity and mortality were 11.7 and 0.2 per cent, respectively. The 30-day anastomotic leak rate was 1.4 per cent. In multivariate analysis, ASA grade > II (P < 0.001), intraoperative blood loss > 50 ml (P = 0.044) and D3 lymph node dissection (P = 0.008) were identified as independent risk factors for postoperative morbidity. Extracorporeal side-to-side anastomosis (P = 0.031), intraoperative blood loss > 50 ml (P = 0.004) and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (P = 0.004) were identified as independent risk factors for anastomotic leak. In high-volume expert centres in China, laparoscopic resection with D3 lymph node dissection was performed in most patients with right-sided colon cancer, and overall postoperative morbidity and mortality was low. Further studies are needed to explore the optimal technique for right hemicolectomy in order to improve outcomes further.

Predicting multiple linear stapler firings in double stapling technique with an MRI-based deep-learning model

Multiple linear stapler firings is a risk factor for anastomotic leakage (AL) in laparoscopic low anterior resection (LAR) using double stapling technique (DST) anastomosis. In this study, our objective was to establish the risk factors for ≥ 3 linear stapler firings, and to create and validate a predictive model for ≥ 3 linear stapler firings in laparoscopic LAR using DST anastomosis. We retrospectively enrolled 328 mid–low rectal cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic LAR using DST anastomosis. With a split ratio of 4:1, patients were randomly divided into 2 sets: the training set (n = 260) and the testing set (n = 68). A clinical predictive model of ≥ 3 linear stapler firings was constructed by binary logistic regression. Based on three-dimensional convolutional networks, we built an image model using only magnetic resonance (MR) images segmented by Mask region-based convolutional neural network, and an integrated model based on both MR images and clinical variables. Area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), and Youden index were calculated for each model. And the three models were validated by an independent cohort of 128 patients. There were 17.7% (58/328) patients received ≥ 3 linear stapler firings. Tumor size ≥ 5 cm (odds ratio (OR) = 2.54, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.15–5.60, p = 0.021) and preoperative carcinoma embryonic antigen (CEA) level > 5 ng/mL [OR = 2.20, 95% CI = 1.20–4.04, p = 0.011] were independent risk factors associated with ≥ 3 linear stapler firings. The integrated model (AUC = 0.88, accuracy = 94.1%) performed better on predicting ≥ 3 linear stapler firings than the clinical model (AUC = 0.72, accuracy = 86.7%) and the image model (AUC = 0.81, accuracy = 91.2%). Similarly, in the validation set, the integrated model (AUC = 0.84, accuracy = 93.8%) performed better than the clinical model (AUC = 0.65, accuracy = 65.6%) and the image model (AUC = 0.75, accuracy = 92.1%). Our deep-learning model based on pelvic MR can help predict the high-risk population with ≥ 3 linear stapler firings in laparoscopic LAR using DST anastomosis. This model might assist in determining preoperatively the anastomotic technique for mid–low rectal cancer patients.

Rates and risk factors for anastomotic leak following blunt trauma-associated bucket handle intestinal injuries: a multicenter study

ObjectivesThe risk factors for anastomotic leak (AL) after resection and primary anastomosis for traumatic bucket handle injury (BHI) have not been previously defined. This multicenter study was conducted to address...

Risk Factors for Rectal Stump Leakage following Discontinuity Resection: Stump Length Matters Most.

Discontinuity resection is commonly conducted to avoid anastomotic leakage in high-risk patients, but potentially results in rectal stump leakage. While risk factors for anastomotic leakage have been widely studied, data on rectal stump leakage rates and underlying risk factors are scarce. To determine rectal stump leakage rates following Hartmann's procedure and to identify patient- and surgery-associated risk factors. A retrospective study with univariate and multivariate analysis to identify risk factors of rectal stump leakage was performed. A subgroup analysis of scheduled operations was carried out. The study was conducted a Heidelberg University Hospital, Germany. Patients who underwent discontinuity resection with rectal stump formation between 2010 and 2020 were included. The main outcome measures included rectal stump leakage rates, 30-day mortality, length of hospitalization and necessity for further invasive treatment. Rectal stump leakage occurred in 11.78% of patients. Rectal stump leakage rates varied considerably depending on the surgical procedure performed and were highest following subtotal pelvic exenteration (34%). Diagnosis of rectal stump leakage peaked on postoperative day 7. A short rectal stump (p = 0.001), previous pelvic radiotherapy (p = 0.04), chemotherapy (p = 0.004) and previous laparotomy (p = 0.03) were independent risk factors for rectal stump leakage in the entire patient collective. In patients undergoing scheduled surgery, a short rectal stump was the only independent risk factor (p = 0.003). Rectal stump leakage was not associated with increased 30-day mortality, but prolonged length of hospitalization and frequently necessitated further invasive treatment. Study results are limited by the retrospective design, a high number of emergency operations and the mere inclusion of symptomatic leakages. Rectal stump leakage is a relevant complication after discontinuity resection. Risk factors should be considered during surgical decision making when both discontinuity resection and abdominoperineal resection are feasible..

Outcomes of Early Versus Standard Closure of Diverting Ileostomy After Proctectomy: Meta-analysis and Meta-regression Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

We aimed to compare outcomes of early and standard closure of diverting loop ileostomy (DLI) after proctectomy and determine risk factors for anastomotic leak (AL) and complications. Formation of DLI has been a routine practice after proctectomy to decrease the incidence and potential adverse sequela of AL. PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared outcomes of early versus standard closure of DLI after proctectomy. Main outcome measures were postoperative complications, AL, ileus, surgical site infection, reoperation, readmission, and hospital stay following DLI closure. Eleven RCTs (932 patients; 57% male) were included. Early closure group included 474 patients and standard closure 458 patients. Early closure was associated with higher odds of AL [odds ratio (OR): 2.315, P =0.013] and similar odds of complications (OR: 1.103, P =0.667), ileus (OR: 1.307, P =0.438), surgical site infection (OR: 1.668, P =0.079), reoperation (OR: 1.896, P =0.062), and readmission (OR: 3.431, P =0.206). Hospital stay was similar (weighted mean difference: 1.054, P =0.237). Early closure had higher odds of AL than standard closure when early closure was done ≤2 weeks (OR: 2.12, P =0.047) but not within 3 to 4 weeks (OR: 2.98, P =0.107). Factors significantly associated with complications after early closure were diabetes mellitus, smoking, and closure of DLI ≤2 weeks, whereas factors associated with AL were ≥ American Society of Anesthesiologists II classification and diabetes mellitus. Early closure of DLI after proctectomy has a higher risk of AL, particularly within 2 weeks of DLI formation. On the basis of this study, routine early ileostomy closure cannot be recommended.

1588P Analysis of risk factors of anastomotic leakage after minimally invasive esophagectomy with circular cervical anastomosis

1588P Analysis of risk factors of anastomotic leakage after minimally invasive esophagectomy with circular cervical anastomosis

Risk factors for anastomotic leakage in patients undergoing colonic procedures within an ERAS-protocol. A retrospective cohort study from the Swedish ERAS-database

Risk factors for anastomotic leakage in patients undergoing colonic procedures within an ERAS-protocol. A retrospective cohort study from the Swedish ERAS-database

333. HIGH CERVICAL ANASTOMOSIS USING NARROW GASTRIC TUBE CAN REDUCE LEAKAGE AFTER MCKEOWN ESOPHAGECTOMY

Abstract Background Anastomotic leakage is one of the most serious complications after esophagectomy. High cervical anastomosis with narrow gastric tube has the potential to reduce the leakage after McKeown esophagectomy. Methods A total of 533 patients who received McKeown radical resection for esophageal cancer in Shanghai Chest Hospital from March 2018 to March 2023 were included in this study, including 281 patients in the normal anastomosis (NA) group and 252 patients in the high anastomosis (HA) group. Potential confounding factors in baseline characteristics were balanced by 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM). We compared the pathological and perioperative results before and after matching between the HA group and NA group, and finally used univariate and multivariate logistic analysis to analyze the independent risk factors of anastomotic leakage. Results After matching, 190 patients remained in both groups. In the comparison of pathological and surgical results, we found that the HA group had an advantage in lymph node harvest (Before matching: 21.3 ± 9.7 vs. 15.8 ± 7.5, p &amp;lt; 0.001; After matching: 21.1 ± 10.0 vs. 15.8 ± 7.7, p &amp;lt; 0.001). There were no significant differences in operation time, blood loss and R0 resection rate between the two groups after matching. The grade of tumor differentiation in HA group was better than that in NA group (p &amp;lt; 0.001), and the pathological staging was earlier than that in NA group (p &amp;lt; 0.001). Overall postoperative complications, including pulmonary infection (p &amp;lt; 0.001), anastomotic leakage (p &amp;lt; 0.001), recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis (p = 0.031), and pleural effusion (p &amp;lt; 0.001), were significantly lower in the HA group than those in the NA group. Multivariate analysis indicated that age &amp;gt; 65 [odds ratio (OR) = 1.433, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.248–1.753; p = 0.003], T4a (OR = 1.19, 95% CI 1.023–1.629; p = 0.016), Neoadjuvant treatment (OR = 0.075, 95% CI 0.038–0.150; p &amp;lt; 0.001) and HA (OR = 0.631, 95% CI 0.213–0.707; p = 0.014) were independent predictors for anastomotic leakage. Conclusions For patients undergoing McKeown esophagectomy, high anastomosis can effectively reduce the incidence of anastomotic leakage and reduce overall perioperative complications. It is a recommended optimized surgical procedure.

The aortic calcification is a risk factor for colorectal anastomotic leakage.

The current pooling up analysis aimed to evaluate whether aortic calcification (AC) was a potential risk factor for anastomotic leakage (AL) after colorectal surgery. In this study, we searched studies in three databases including PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library on April 20, 2022. In order to investigate the association between AC and AL, the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of AC were pooled up. Our study was performed with RevMan 5.3 according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. We finally enrolled eight studies involving 1955 patients for statistical analysis. As for all patients, we found that AC could significantly increase the risk of AL after surgery (HR = 2.31, I2 = 0%, 95%CI = 1.58 to 3.38, P < 0.01). In five studies including patients undergoing colorectal surgery (benign diseases and cancers), AC was also a risk factor for AL (HR = 3.30, I2 = 2%; 95%CI = 1.83 to 5.95, P < 0.01). In terms of the other three studies that only included CRC patients, there was still a correction between AC and AL (HR = 1.80, I2 = 0%, 95%CI = 1.10 to 2.96, P = 0.02). Patients with AC were more likely to develop AL after colorectal surgery. Moreover, subgroup analysis suggested that AC was a predictor for AL after CRC surgery.

Analysis of surgical outcomes and risk factors for anastomotic leakage following trans-hiatal resection of esophagogastric junction cancer.

The trans-hiatal lower esophagectomy is considered less invasive than the trans-thoracic esophagectomy for resection of esophagogastric junction (EGJ) cancer. However, the optimal procedure remains controversial and should be determined while considering both oncological and safety aspects. This retrospective study comprised 124 patients that underwent curative resection for EGJ cancer. The study analysis included 93 patients with tumor centers located within 2 cm of the EGJ. Clinicopathological findings and surgical outcomes were compared between patients treated using trans-hiatal and trans-thoracic approaches. Sixty-three patients underwent lower esophagectomy using the trans-hiatal approach (TH-G). The remaining 30 patients underwent esophagectomy using the trans-thoracic approach (TT-E). The TH-G group were older, had a lower prevalence of lymphatic spread, shorter length of esophageal invasion, and shorter operative duration compared to the TT-E group. Although no significant differences in the frequency of postoperative complications, a higher proportion of patients in the TH-G group developed anastomotic leakage (16% vs. 7%, p = 0.33). Univariate and multivariate analyses demonstrated that cardiac comorbidity was an independent risk factor for anastomotic leakage (odds ratio, 5.24; 95% CI, 1.06-25.9; P < 0.05) in TH-G group. Further examination revealed that preoperative cardiothoracic ratio (CTR) with 50% or greater could be surrogate marker as risk factor for anastomotic leakage in TH-G group (35% vs. 7.5%, p < 0.05). The trans-hiatal approach can be used for resection of EGJ cancer. However, special attention should be paid to the prevention of anastomotic leakage in patients with cardiac comorbidities or a large preoperative CTR.

Prediction model using risk factors associated with anastomotic leakage after minimally invasive esophagectomy.

To explore the risk factors of anastomotic leakage after minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) and to build a prediction model of the probability of postoperative anastomotic leakage. Clinical data of patients undergoing MIE, admitted in the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University from March 2018 to March 2022, were retrospectively selected, and risk factors of anastomotic leakage after MIE were analyzed by univariate and multivariate logistic regression. A prediction nomogram model was established based on the independent risk factors, and its prediction effect was evaluated. A total of 308 patients were included. Thirty patients had postoperative anastomotic leakage, with an incidence of 9.74%. Logistic regression analysis showed that age, postoperative delirium, pleural adhesion, postoperative pulmonary complications, high postoperative white blood cell count and low lymphocyte count were risk factors for postoperative anastomotic leakage. A nomograph prediction model was constructed based on these risk factors. The predicted probability of occurrence of the nomograph model was consistent with the actual probability of occurrence. The calculated C-index value (Bootstrap method) was 0.9609, indicating that the nomograph prediction model had a good discrimination ability. By drawing the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, we showed that the area under the curve (AUC) of the nomograph prediction model was 0.9609 (95%CI: 0.937-0.985), which indicated a good prediction efficiency of the model. The nomograph prediction model based on the independent risk factors of anastomotic leakage after MIE can accurately predict the probability of postoperative anastomotic leakage.

Anastomotic leak risk factors following colon cancer resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Despite improved surgical techniques, anastomotic leakage is still a serious complication that can occur after colon cancer resection, resulting in increased morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to evaluate the risk factors for anastomotic leakage after colon cancer surgery, provide a theoretical basis for reducing its occurrence, and guide the practice of clinicians. A systematic review of PubMed, Ovid, Web of Science and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases was conducted by using a combination of subject terms and free words for online searches. The databases were searched from their inception to 31 March 2022, and all cross-sectional, cohort or case‒control studies examining the risk factors for the development of anastomotic fistula after surgery for colon cancer were identified. A total of 2133 articles were searched for this study, and 16 publications were ultimately included, all of which were cohort studies. A total of 115,462 subjects were included, and a total of 3959 cases of anastomotic leakage occurred postoperatively, with an incidence of 3.4%. The odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were used for evaluation. Male sex (OR = 1.37, 95% CI: 1.29-1.46, P < 0.00001), BMI (OR = 1.04, 95% CI: 1.00-1.08, P = 0.03), diabetes (OR = 2.80, 95% CI: 1.81-4.33, P < 0.00001), combined lung disease (OR = 1.28, 95% CI: 1.15-1.42, P < 0.00001), anaesthesia ASA score (OR = 1.35, 95% CI: 1.24-1.46, P < 0.00001), ASA class ≥ III (OR = 1.34, 95% CI: 1.22-1.47, P < 0.00001), emergency surgery (OR = 1.31, 95% CI: 1.11-1.55, P = 0.001), open surgery (OR = 1.94, 95% CI: 1.69-2.24, P < 0.00001) and type of surgical resection (OR = 1.34, 95% CI: 1.12-1.61, P = 0.002) are risk factors for anastomotic leakage after colon cancer surgery. There is still a lack of strong evidence on whether age (OR = 1.00, 95% CI: 0.99-1.01, P = 0.36) and cardiovascular disease (OR = 1.18, 95% CI: 0.94-1.47, P = 0.16) are factors influencing the occurrence of anastomotic leakage after colon cancer surgery. Male sex, BMI, obesity, coexisting pulmonary disease, anaesthesia ASA score, emergency surgery, open surgery and type of resection were risk factors for anastomotic leakage after colon cancer surgery. The effect of age and cardiovascular disease on postoperative anastomotic leakage in patients with colon cancer needs further study.