Rigid Brace Research Articles

Rigid Thoracolumbar Orthosis Does Not Improve Outcomes of Acute Adolescent Spondylolysis as Compared with Placebo. Bony Union Predicts Improved Health-Related Quality of Life Outcomes at 2-year Follow-Up.

A prospective, comparative study on clinical, radiographic, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) outcomes in adolescents with acute spondylolysis treated with a rigid thoracolumbar orthosis (Boston brace) or with a placebo (elastic lumbar support) with a 2-year follow-up time. To compare outcomes of acute adolescent spondylolysis treated with a rigid thoracolumbar orthosis or a placebo with a 2-year follow-up time. The benefits of the use of rigid orthosis for treatment of spondylolysis and achieving bony union of spondylolysis remains unclear. Sixty consecutive patients with acute spondylolysis were prospectively enrolled. Three patients were excluded from analysis as they did not fulfill inclusion criteria. First 14 patients were randomized and the remaining 46 chose treatment method themselves. Treatment time was four months and follow-up time was two years. HRQoL was measured using Scoliosis Research Society-24 (SRS-24) outcome questionnaire. The primary outcome was the HRQoL at 24 months and whether treatment type, bony union of the spondylolysis or development of spondylolisthesis affected it. Thirty (30/57) patients were treated with a Boston brace and twenty-seven (27/57) patients with a placebo. The bony union rate of spondylolysis did not differ between study groups (20/30 vs 17/27, respectively, P=0.789). The HRQoL did not differ between treatment groups in the SRS-24 domains through follow-up (P>0.05 for all). Five patients (5/57) developed spondylolisthesis (mean slip 4.2mm) during two-year follow-up time. Non-union of the spondylolysis predicted development of spondylolisthesis (P=0.005), but treatment type did not affect it (P>0.05). Two years after treatment patients who had bony union had higher SRS-24 total (P=0.005) and satisfaction domain (P<0.001) compared to patients with non-union. A rigid brace is not necessary for treatment of acute spondylolysis. Achieving bony union of adolescent spondylolysis is desirable as their HRQoL is higher at two years. II.

Is orthotic treatment beneficial for fresh osteoporotic vertebral fractures? A propensity score matching study

BACKGROUND CONTEXTOrthotic treatment is a common option for the conservative treatment of osteoporotic vertebral fractures (OVF). However, there is insufficient evidence of its clinical benefit. PURPOSETo investigate the effectiveness of orthotic treatment for OVF. STUDY DESIGN/SETTINGRetrospective cohort study with data from two prospective studies. PATIENT SAMPLEThis study included 160 patients with fresh OVF enrolled in 2012 and 2020 prospective cohort studies. OUTCOME MEASURESThe visual analog scale (VAS) score for low back pain was used for clinical outcomes, and radiographic parameters included the percent height of the vertebra and angular change of the vertebral body. Moreover, the occurrence of secondary vertebral fractures was followed-up over time. METHODSThe patients were divided into brace and no-brace groups and were matched according to propensity score for age, sex, anterior percent height at the initial examination, and presence of old OVFs. Hazard ratio for the cumulative incidence of secondary vertebral fractures with and without bracing were calculated and analyzed using the generalized Wilcoxon test. In addition, the brace group was divided into soft and rigid brace groups and compared with the no-brace group. RESULTSEach group had 61 cases after propensity score matching. There were no significant differences in the VAS improvement for low back pain and the change in percent height of the anterior and posterior walls from initial examination to 6 months after injury (p=.87, p=.39 and p=.14, respectively, mixed-effect models). Meanwhile, the mean angular change of fractured vertebrae was 4.3° / 3.2° initially and 1.2° / 2.5° at 6 months (the brace group / no-brace group, respectively; p=.007, mixed-effect models). A significant difference was also observed between the rigid brace group and the no-brace group (p=.008, mixed effect models). The incidence of secondary vertebral fractures was 1.6% / 11.4% at 1 month, indicating a significant difference (the brace group / no-brace group, respectively; p = .028). The hazard ratio for the cumulative incidence of secondary fractures due to orthotic treatment was 0.47 (95% confidence interval 0.20–1.09, p=.054). CONCLUSIONSAlthough orthotic treatment for fresh OVF did not relieve pain, it might contribute to the stabilization of the fractured vertebra, especially using a rigid brace. Moreover, it might influence a reduction of the imminent vertebral fracture risk immediately after the onset of OVF. ClassificationsClinical study

Failure of Pavlik Harness Treatment in Infants Under 6 Months Old with Dislocated Hips: Short- and Intermediate-Term Results of Subsequent Treatment Modalities

ObjectiveThis study aimed to determine the short- and medium-term outcomes of hip dislocation in infants who failed Pavlik harness therapy and were subsequently treated with brace, closed reduction (CR) or open reduction (OR) before 6 months of age.MethodsFifty infants (66 hip dislocations) who failed Pavlik harness therapy between 2000 and 2018 and were treated with a rigid abduction brace or undergoing a CR or OR/cast were evaluated. All demographic data obtained from the medical system, developments and complications during the follow-up and treatment process were recorded and evaluated.ResultsFifty infants (66 hips) with dislocated hips failed Pavlik harness therapy. Of these, 9 infants (12 hips) underwent rigid abduction splint therapy: 9 hips were successful, 2 hips had CR and 1 had OR. Thirty-eight infants (51 hips) had index CR, of which 3 (3 hips) failed and had OR. Radiographs of 49 hips (44 patients) were normal at the final evaluation. Pavlik harness therapy starting after 3 weeks (P = 0.028) and unilateral dislocations (P = 0.028) increased the risk of needing operating room. There was an association between OR and avascular necrosis (P = 0.025), but not between OR and other complications—dysplasia and re-dislocation/subluxation (P = 0.257 and P = 0.508, respectively).ConclusionClosed treatment of hip dislocation is possible in most babies who fail Pavlik treatment. Babies who are started on Pavlik therapy after 3 weeks of age may be at increased risk of needing an operating room.Level of EvidenceIV.

Medical Device-Related Pressure Injury in The Median Back Caused by A Rigid Brace

Medical Device-Related Pressure Injury in The Median Back Caused by A Rigid Brace

The New Modular Sforzesco Brace (Modular Italian Brace) Is as Effective as the Classical One: A Retrospective Controlled Study from a Prospective Cohort.

Background: The Sforzesco brace is a very rigid push-up brace effective in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). We recently developed a new Sforzesco brace based on modularity (the Modular Italian brace-MI brace) that could allow standardization, facilitating global expertise diffusion, increased modifiability and adaptability, and cost savings due to longer brace life. We aimed to compare the short-term results of the two braces. Methods: The retrospective study included 231 consecutive AIS treated with a MI brace (N = 53) or Sforzesco brace (N = 178). The main outcome was the first 6-month follow-up out-of-brace radiograph Cobb angle change. Secondary outcomes included the in-brace Cobb degrees and aesthetics (TRACE), prominence (angle of trunk rotation and mm), kyphosis, and lordosis changes. Results: The two groups were similar at baseline, apart from more immature patients in MI brace. Both braces reduced the Cobb angle (-6° out-of-brace; -16° in-brace) without differences between groups. All secondary outcomes improved, apart from a statistically and clinically insignificant 3° kyphosis reduction. The MI brace participants were 4.9 times more likely to improve the Cobb angle than the Sforzesco brace (OR = 4.92; 95%CI 1.91-12.64; p = 0.001). Conclusions: These findings suggest that the MI-brace can be safely used instead of the classical Sforzesco brace. However, further studies of different designs and longer follow-ups are needed to confirm these findings.

A new custom-made bivalve brace for pectus carinatum in children and adolescents: preliminary promising experience of 140 patients from a tertiary center.

International research suggests that poor patient compliance is the main cause of tutor failures in the context of potential novel orthopedic bivalve braces for conservative treatment of pectus carinatum. Our entire experimental study is based on the hypothesis that a rigid bivalve brace that patients can accept could solve the main problem associated with the conservative approach-poor compliance. The hypothesis was to reduce the thickness and weight of the classic bivalve brace to ensure concealment and make it sustainable enough to be worn several hours a day without compromising its therapeutic efficacy. The research was conducted from January 2020 to December 2022 to ensure follow-up of all participants for at least 6 months. In 36 months, 140 patients with pectus carinatum were assessed and conservatively treated with the studied guardian to analyze the therapeutic efficacy of the bivalve brace and patient compliance. From the initial visit, the parents and patient were informed that this is a 2-year therapeutic course during which the bivalve brace should be worn at least 23 h a day (with 1 h of abstinence per day for routine personal hygiene practices). Compliance is the key to therapy success, and the duration of treatment depends on patient adherence. The exceptional effectiveness of the experimental brace was confirmed by both the questionnaire from the patients (with an average satisfaction rate of 8.9/10) and an assessment of the therapy's results by a properly selected medical committee (with a VAS scale satisfaction of 7.2/10 for symmetric forms and 7.1/10 for asymmetric ones). In conclusion, the analyzed data confirmed the research hypotheses. First, none of the 140 patients had cardiovascular diseases directly related to their condition, confirming that pectus carinatum is a pathology of a purely aesthetic nature. Second, a cheap, lightweight, and easily obscured brace significantly improved patient compliance. Along with this, the social relevance of the aesthetic aspect today may be an important factor in motivating the study cohort to adhere to therapy. In the past, esthetics and appearance were less relevant at the social level, which may have contributed to the high abandonment and reduced compliance rates of the many studies in the literature.

New and Traditional Treatment Options for Idiopathic Scoliosis in Children and Adolescents

Scoliosis is a medical condition common in children and adolescents, which causes an abnormal curvature of the spine in a “C” or “S” shape. Three main forms of scoliosis exist: neuromuscular, congenital, and idiopathic with idiopathic being most common. Traditional treatments include observation, rigid bracing (a corrective orthosis), casting, surgery, and physiotherapeutic scoliosis-specific exercises. Surgical corrections include spinal fusion or placement of traditional or growing rods. Treatment options for scoliosis have recently expanded, to include newer flexible bracing and surgical procedures such as tethering and posterior dynamic deformity correction. Providers should be screening for scoliosis, and all providers can benefit from knowing the latest options available to help their patients receive the best care before reaching skeletal maturity.

Clinical Diagnosis and Treatment of 43 Cases of Occipital Condylar Fractures: A Single-Center Retrospective Study

This study aimed to examine the mechanism of occipital condyle fractures (OCFs), their clinical symptoms, computer tomography (CT) scan findings, treatment options, and classification. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 43 patients with OCFs who were admitted to our neurosurgery center between 2017 and2023. The investigation covered their clinical symptoms, CT scan results, and treatment outcomes. It was found that 25.6% of the patients suffered from severe craniocerebral injuries with Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores of 3-8 points, 9.3% had moderate injuries with GCS scores of 9-12 points, and 65.1% exhibited mild injuries with GCS scores of 13-15 points. Of these patients, 90.7% showed improvement upon discharge, 4.7% succumbed to their injuries, and another 4.7% developed paraplegia. Symptoms indicative of OCF in individuals with CCJ injuries included neck pain, swelling, cranial nerve palsy, and posterior pharyngeal wall swelling. Frequently observed complications in OCF patients included cerebral contusion, occipital bone fractures, and skull base fractures. Employing thin-layer CT scans of the CCJ area, along with sagittal and coronal CT reconstructions, is essential for identifying OCFs. The fractures were classified into 3 types based on the Anderson-Montesano classification, which, when modified, provides enhanced treatment guidance. OCFs are predominantly present in cases of high-energy trauma, with high-resolution thin-layer CT scans serving as the preferred diagnostic method. The application of the modified Anderson-Montesano classification, distinguishing between stable and unstable fractures, facilitates the determination of suitable treatment strategies. Stable OCFs can be managed using a rigid neck brace, while unstable OCFs may require Halo-vest frame fixation or surgical intervention.

Acute Effect of Brace Use on Upper-Extremity Functionality in Adolescent Individuals With Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Cross-Sectional Study.

It is well known that scoliosis adversely affects the functions of the upper extremities. However, the acute effect of rigid braces, which are widely used in the conservative treatment of scoliosis, on upper-extremity functionality remains unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate the acute effect of a rigid thoracolumbosacral brace use on upper-extremity functionality in individuals with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Thirty-eight individuals diagnosed with AIS participated in this cross-sectional study, with a mean age of 14.55 ± 1.90years and a range of 10-18years. The upper-extremity functionality was assessed using the Nine-Hole Peg Test and handgrip strength, with assessments conducted under both in-brace (with their own braces) and out-of-brace conditions. Nine-Hole Peg Test durations of the AIS patients for the nondominant side were significantly lower for in-brace conditions compared with out-of-brace conditions (p = .049, effect size = 0.136). The grip strength of the nondominant side was significantly higher for in-brace conditions compared with out-of-brace conditions (p = .025, effect size = 0.365). A weak negative correlation was found between the degree of curvature and the grip strength of the dominant side for in-brace conditions (r = -.323, p = .048). It was concluded that the brace had a positive effect on upper-extremity functionality on the nondominant side by both shortening the Nine-Hole Peg Test duration and increasing grip strength. In AIS patients, the brace may positively affect daily living by improving the functionality of the nondominant extremity.

A COMPARATIVE REVIEW OF NON-INVASIVE SCOLIOSIS TREATMENT IN CHILDREN AND TEENAGERS

Pediatric and adolescent scoliosis is one of the most common and prevailing orthopedic pathologies leading to spinal deformation. Cases of scoliosis where curving of the spine is &lt;45% treated mostly surgically. However, when the spine is straightened with an implant, there are risks and complications. Hence, interest to conservative treatment methods has increased significantly. This article discusses advantages and disadvantages of non-invasive methods for treating scoliosis. The disadvantage is the duration of treatment: treating scoliosis using conservative methods such as physical therapy and wearing bondages can take a long time to achieve results. Also, there is a need for regular control: conservative treatment of scoliosis requires regular control by doctors and specialists to assess progress and change treatment plan if necessary. The most promising methods of conservative treatment, including correction of the muscular system, have been identified – adaptation physical exercises and gymnastics due to physical impact on kyphotic and scoliotic deformity. This includes breathing and physical exercises, therapeutic horse riding and wearing rigid torsion brace.

Spinal Orthosis in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: An Overview of the Braces Provided by the National Health Service in Italy.

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is a lateral, rotated curvature of the spine. It is a 3-dimensional deformity that arises in otherwise healthy children at or around puberty. AIS is the most common form of scoliosis in the pediatric population. The etiology is multifactorial, including genetic and environmental factors. The incidence is roughly equal between males and females, while there is a higher risk of progression in females. Guidelines for AIS treatment identify three levels of treatment: observation, physiotherapy scoliosis-specific exercises, and braces. In this paper, we carried out a review of the scientific literature about the indication and success rates of the braces provided for free by the National Health Service in Italy (SSN). Despite a general consensus on the efficacy of rigid bracing treatment and its use in AIS, an important heterogeneity about the treatment is present in the scientific literature, demonstrating a high degree of variability. The overall success rate of the braces provided by the SSN is high, suggesting an important therapeutic role in the treatment of AIS. Robust guidelines are needed to ensure uniform and effective treatments.

Optimal bracing system design for funicular twin arches against out-of-plane buckling

Twin arch bridges are often designed with a bracing member system that can significantly enhance the out-of-plane stability. This study presents an exact matrix stiffness method (MSM) for the out-of-plane buckling analysis of funicular twin arch bridges and investigates the optimal bracing system design. A novel 14 × 14 s-order element stiffness matrix of three-dimensional beam–columns was used in the MSM and the out-of-plane buckling analysis was performed after assembling the exact global structural stability stiffness matrix. The influences of the bracing location, number, length, and flexural rigidity of both the transverse bracing and X-bracing systems on the buckling capacity of the twin arch system were investigated. The in-plane stiffness of the bracing system (i.e., the horizontal flexural rigidity in a transverse bracing system) was found to be the critical factor in suppressing the out-of-plane buckling of the twin arch system. In addition, the twin arch system achieved the maximum out-of-plane buckling capacity with the bracing location at S/4, where S is the total arc length. For optimal bracing system design of funicular twin arches, it is recommended that one uses the more economical X-bracing system or a transverse bracing system with adequately rigid bracing members.

Is higher compliance to brace therapy associated with poorer quality of life and self-image? A 36-months follow-up study.

Brace treatment is the most effective tool for avoiding curve progression in moderate adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and high adherence is required to achieve therapeutic success. Despite this, the compliance often is impaired by the concern about the psychological well-being of adolescents. This 36-month follow-up study investigated if the patients most adherent to brace treatment could report a stronger impairment in the quality of life and body image. 64 adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis responded to the Scoliosis Research Society-22 revised Patient Questionnaire at 12, 24, and 36 months after prescription of a TLSO rigid brace. Retrospectively, participants who wore a brace for more than 75% of the prescribed time were assigned to the good-compliance group (GC); the others formed the poor-compliance group (PC). At 12 months the GC group showed higher scores in treatment satisfaction and at 36 months they did not differ from the PC group in the overall SRS-22r score. Moreover, they achieved a statistically significant improvement in the scoliosis severity, although they showed lower scores in the self-image domain. In our patient's cohort, increased brace adherence does not compromise QoL and provides better treatment outcomes. However, more attention is needed to maintain good self-perception.

Evaluation of the effectiveness of soft braces on idiopathic scoliosis: A review of literature

Background: Various treatment approaches are used for subjects with idiopathic scoliosis, however using a brace is one of the most common approaches in this regard. The braces used for idiopathic scoliosis can be divided into soft and rigid braces. SpineCor brace is mostly recommended for subjects who refused to use rigid braces. However, it is not well understood whether soft braces are as effective as rigid braces to control scoliosis curve progression or not. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of soft braces used for idiopathic scoliotic curves compared to other available braces. Method: A search was done in databases including PubMed, Google Scholar, ISI Web of Knowledge, Ebsco, Embasco, and Scopus. Keywords of the soft brace, SpineCor were used in combination with scoliosis. The quality of the selected studies was evaluated by use of the Down and Black tool, which is a reliable method to evaluate the quality of the studies. Results: Based on the aforementioned keywords, 52 studies were achieved. After reviewing the title and abstract of each study 11 papers were selected for final analysis. Eight studies were on the evaluation of the effectiveness of the SpineCor brace on scoliosis. There were three studies on the comparison of the SpineCor with other available rigid braces. Conclusion: The results of selected studies confirmed that the SpineCor brace can be used to control the progression of idiopathic scoliosis. However, its effectiveness is limited to the curves with a severity of fewer than 30° and for the patients with Risser signs 0–3. The effectiveness of SpineCor is not comparable with a rigid brace, especially for the curve above 40°. SpineCor stabilizes the spine with high compliance and with significant improvement in posture, rib hump, lumbar predominance, and muscle contraction.

Association between radiographic and functional outcome in vertebral osteomyelitis SPONDIMMO, a 6-month prospective multicenter cohort

ObjectivesThis study aimed to describe radiographic and functional evolution over 6 months in a large cohort of VO patients. MethodsWe prospectively recruited patients with VO from 2016 to 2019 in 11 French centers. X-rays were performed at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months to assess progression using structural and static criteria. Functional impairment was evaluated using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) at 3 months and 6 months. ResultsTwo hundred and twenty-two patients were included. Mean age was 67.8±14 years, mostly men (67.6%). After 3 months, there was a significant increase in vertebral fusion (16.4% vs 52.7%), destruction of vertebral bodies (10.1% vs 22.8%), and of all the static features (frontal angulation (15.2% vs 24.4%), segmental (34.6% vs 56%) and regional (24.5% vs 41%) kyphosis). From 3 to 6 months, among the different X-ray abnormalities, only the complete fusion progressed significantly (16.6% vs 27.2%). Median ODI showed significant improvement from 3 to 6 months (24, IQR [11.5–38] vs 16, IQR [6–34]). At 6 months, 14.1% of the patients had a severe disability, 2% a major disability. The persistence of vertebral destruction at 6 months was associated with a higher ODI (16, IQR [7.5–30.5] vs 27, IQR [11.5–44.5]). No differences in radiological progression were observed with immobilization using a rigid brace. ConclusionOur study demonstrates structural and static radiographic progression after 3 months. Only the complete fusion progressed over the long-term. Functional impairment was associated with persistence of vertebral destruction.

Clinical outcomes after bracing for vertebral compression fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.

Vertebral compression fractures are common and result in significant pain and loss of function. Treatment strategy, however, remains controversial. We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized trials to elucidate the impact of bracing on these injuries. A comprehensive literature review utilizing Embase, OVID MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Library was performed to identify randomized trials evaluating brace therapy for adult patients with thoracic and lumbar compression fractures. Two independent reviewers assessed the eligibility of studies and risk of bias. The primary assessed outcome was pain after injury. Secondary outcomes were function, quality of life, opioid use, and kyphotic progression [anterior vertebral body compression percentage (AVBCP)]. Continuous variables were analyzed using mean differences and standardized mean differences, and dichotomous variables were analyzed using odds ratios in random-effects models. GRADE criteria were applied. Of 1,502 articles, a total of 3 studies with 447 patients (96% female) were included. Fifty-four patients were managed without a brace, and 393 with a brace (195 rigid, 198 soft). At 3 to 6 months post-injury, rigid bracing resulted in significantly less pain compared to no brace (SMD =-1.32, 95% CI: -1.89 to -0.76, P<0.05, I2=41%), though this diminished at long-term follow-up of 48 weeks. Radiographic kyphosis, opioid use, function, or quality of life were not significantly different at any timepoint. Moderate quality evidence demonstrates rigid bracing of vertebral compression fractures may decrease pain up to 6 months post-injury, though there is no difference in radiographic parameters, opioid use, function, or quality of life at short- or long-term follow-up. No difference was found between rigid and soft bracing; therefore, soft bracing may be an adequate alternative.

A Hybrid Anchoring Technology Composed of Reinforced Flexible Shells for a Knee Unloading Exosuit.

Soft robotic wearables have emerged as an ergonomic alternative to rigid robotic wearables, commonly utilizing tension-based actuation systems. However, their soft structure's natural tendency to buckle limits their use for compression bearing applications. This study presents reinforced flexible shell (RFS) anchoring, a compliant, low-profile, ergonomic wearable platform capable of high compression resistance. RFS anchors are fabricated with soft and semirigid materials that typically buckle under compressive loads. Buckling is overcome using the wearer's leg as a support structure, reinforcing the shells with straps, and minimizing the space between the shells and the wearer's skin-enabling force transmission orders of magnitude larger. RFS anchoring performance was evaluated comparatively by examining the shift-deformation profiles of three identically designed braces fabricated with different materials: rigid, strapped RFS, and unstrapped RFS. The unstrapped RFS severely deformed before 200 N of force could be applied. The strapped RFS successfully supported 200 N of force and exhibited a nearly identical transient shift-deformation profile with the rigid brace condition. RFS anchoring technology was applied to a compression-resistant hybrid exosuit, Exo-Unloader, for knee osteoarthritis. Exo-Unloader utilizes a tendon-driven linear sliding actuation system that unloads the medial and lateral compartments of the knee. Exo-Unloader can deliver 200 N of unloading force without deforming, as indicted by its similar transient shift-deformation profile with a rigid unloader baseline. Although rigid braces effectively withstand and transmit high compressive loads, they lack compliance; RFS anchoring technology expands the application of soft and flexible materials to compression-based wearable assistive systems.

Design and characterize of kirigami-inspired springs and the application in vertebrae exoskeleton for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis brace treatment

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis is a common condition that affects children between the age of 10 and young adulthood. Rigid brace treatment is an effective treatment to control the progression of spinal deformity. However, it limits mobility and causes discomfort, which leads to low treatment compliance. In this study, we developed and characterized a kirigami-inspired CT/MRI compatible spring that could be employed to modify our previously designed exoskeleton hinge vertebrae to provide immediate in-brace correction, good wear comfort, and one that does not inhibit mobility simultaneously. Additive manufacturing has drawn significant interest in academic and industrial terms due to its ability to produce geometrically complex structures. The structural design and dimension of the proposed 3D printed kirigami-inspired springs were optimized with the finite element method (FEM). The carbon-fiber-reinforced nylon material (PA-CF) was selected as the material of the kirigami-inspired spring with the balance of printing easiness and performance of the material. The stiffness of designed kirigami-inspired springs varied between 1.20 and 42.01 N/mm. A case series study with three scoliosis patients has been conducted to investigate the immediate in-brace effect on reducing the spinal curvature and asymmetry of the body contours using radiographic examination. The experiment results show that there are 4.6%–50.5% improvements in Cobb angle for different sections of spines. The X-ray images proved that our kirigami-inspired springs would not block views for Cobb angle measurements.

A Multidimensional Assessment of a Novel Adaptive Versus Traditional Passive Ankle Sprain Protection Systems

Background: Ankle braces aim to reduce lateral ankle sprains. Next to protection, factors influencing user compliance, such as sports performance, motion restriction, and users’ perceptions, are relevant for user compliance and thus injury prevention. Novel adaptive protection systems claim to change their mechanical behavior based on the intensity of motion (eg, the inversion velocity), unlike traditional passive concepts of ankle bracing. Purpose: To compare the performance of a novel adaptive brace with 2 passive ankle braces while considering protection, sports performance, freedom of motion, and subjective perception. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: The authors analyzed 1 adaptive and 2 passive (one lace-up and one rigid brace) ankle braces, worn in a low-cut, indoor sports shoe, which was also the no-brace reference condition. We performed material testing using an artificial ankle joint system at high and low inversion velocities. Further, 20 male, young, healthy team sports athletes were analyzed using 3-dimensional motion analysis in sports-related movements to address protection, sports performance, and active range of motion dimensions. Participants rated subjective comfort, stability, and restriction experienced when using the products. Results: Subjective stability rating was not different between the adaptive and passive systems. The rigid brace was superior in restricting peak inversion during the biomechanical testing compared with the passive braces. However, in the material test, the adaptive brace increased its stiffness by approximately 400% during the fast compared with the slow inversion velocities, demonstrating its adaptive behavior and similar stiffness values to passive braces. We identified minor differences in sports performance tasks. The adaptive brace improved active ankle range of motion and subjective comfort and restriction ratings. Conclusion: The adaptive brace offered similar protective effects in high-velocity inversion situations to those of the passive braces while improving range of motion, comfort, and restriction rating during noninjurious motions. Clinical Relevance: Protection systems are only effective when used. Compared with traditional passive ankle brace technologies, the novel adaptive brace might increase user compliance by improving comfort and freedom of movement while offering similar protection in injurious situations.

Vertebral refracture after percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures with and without brace wearing: A retrospective study of 300 patients.

The aim of the study was to examine the clinical incidence rate of vertebral body fractures after percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) with and without brace wearing and provide a new guiding ideology for preventing vertebral fractures after clinical surgeries. The retrospective analysis included 100 outpatients who underwent PVP between January 2017 and December 2018 without bracing after PVP surgeries (non-brace-wearing group). In total, 100 patients were paired into the rigid brace group and 100 patients were paired into the soft braces group according to propensity score matching. Seven independent variables were used in the soft and rigid brace group: age, sex, body mass index (BMI), visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and Cobb angle. The VAS, ODI, and Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores were recorded preoperatively on the second day, after 1 month, after 3 months, and during the last follow-up postoperatively. We recorded the incidence of vertebral refracture in each of the three groups of patients and evaluated the effect of braces on postoperative fractures based on the ODI, VAS, and JOA scores. All patients were followed up for 8-24 months (mean 22.4 months). Compared with the preoperative values, the age, sex, BMI, bone density, ODI, VAS, and Cobb angle between refracture and non-refracture were not statistically significant. The VAS, ODI, and JOA scores significantly increased in the brace-wearing group compared with those of the non-brace-wearing group (p < 0.05). The incidence of vertebral refracture in the brace-wearing group was lower than that in the non-brace-wearing group, between which there was a significant difference (p < 0.05). Three months postoperatively, the JOA score of the soft brace group was significantly higher than that of the rigid brace group (p < 0.05). During the last follow-up, it was found that there was no difference in the VAS score, the incidence of refracture, or ODI between the soft brace group and the rigid brace group (p > 0.05). The improvement in the JOA score of the soft brace group was better than that of the rigid brace group, between which there was a significant difference (p < 0.05). Braces can improve the prognosis of quality of life and postoperative subjective perception, whose presence can relieve postoperative residual pains. In contrast, patients can have a better medical experience wearing a soft brace.