Ridge Sign Research Articles

POLA KOMUNIKASI KELUARGA DAN KEPERCAYAAN DIRI (STUDI KASUS PENGARUH POLA KOMUNIKASI ORANGTUA TERHADAP KEPERCAYAAN DIRI MAHASISWA ILMU KOMUNIKASI UNIVERSITAS PGRI RONGGOLAWE TUBAN)

This study is a quantitative study that aims to determine the effect of parental communication patterns on student self-confidence. The subjects in this study were Communication Studies students, PGRI Ronggolawe University, Tuban. Data collection methods used are questionnaires and documentation. The results of this study indicate that there is a significant effect of parental communication patterns on self-confidence. It can be seen from the results of the Hypothesis Test which shows that the significance value is 0.48 (<0.05), which means that H_1 is accepted and H_0 is rejected. With the direction of the relationship between the variable x and the variable y showing a positive ridge sign for the variable x and variable y.

Clinical application of the 2011 IFCPC colposcope terminology

BackgroundColposcopy offers an accurate way to the diagnose of cervical precancerous lesions. However, the diagnostic accuracy of colposcopy is unsatisfied. This study was to evaluate colposcopic accuracy according to the 2011 International Federation of Cervical Pathology and Colposcopy (IFCPC) terminology.MethodsA retrospective cohort study was performed in 1,838 patients who underwent colposcopy in Shandong Qianfoshan Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University from October 2013 to April 2018. Using conization or cervical biopsy pathology as the gold standard, the agreement between colposcopic diagnosis and pathologic diagnosis was calculated, and correlations between variables were analyzed.ResultsAs an authoritative and widely used terminology for colposcopy diagnosis, the 2011 IFCPC terminology has certain clinical practicality and diagnostic accuracy. However, some signs such as mosaic, punctation, sharp border, inner border sign and ridge sign had high specificity but unsatisfactory sensitivity, which limited the diagnostic value. Therefore, we discussed the Lugol’s staining, a very common sign in colposcopy, and analyzed the diagnostic significance of bright yellow staining in low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) and mustard yellow staining in high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL). The results showed that mustard yellow may be a valuable indicator in the diagnosis of HSIL.ConclusionThe 2011 IFCPC colposcope terminology has standardized interpretations of the colposcopic findings and improved the accuracy of colposcopy diagnosis. The aceto-white epithelium still has important diagnostic value; however, the value of a few signs is needed to be discussed and new signs are expected to be discovered. Although the significance of Lugol’s staining was diminishing, mustard yellow might be a valuable indicator for the diagnosis of HSIL.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Endocervicoscopy in Identifying and Grading Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Lesion

Introduction: Colposcopy represents the second step of the diagnostic approach of cervical intraepithelial lesions. Limits of colposcopy in studying cervix are essentially related to cervical anatomy. Nowadays, endocervical courettage is the standard technique to examine endocervix. Endocervicoscopy is a new imaging technique for the diagnostic work-up of endocervix in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN). Objective: To evaluate endocervicoscopy accuracy to identify and grade cervical intraepithelial lesion in comparison to other procedures employed into the diagnostic workup of cervical pathology. Methods: A total of 634 women who performed colposcopy, endocervicoscopy and cytological or histological sampling were included in a retrospective study. The agreement between the endocervicoscopic and the colposcopic impressions, minor and major changes, and between these imaging techniques and histological diagnosis was assessed for the entire cohort. χ² test and k statistic were used in the statistical analysis. Results: The extension of the lesion resulted significantly greater at endocervicoscopy than at colposcopy. We showed a statistically significant association between colposcopy and endocervicoscopy findings. Overall, the correlation of minor or major findings between colposcopy and endocervicoscopy was statistically significant with a p value for all parameters <0.0001. Description of mosaic/punctuation, cuffed crypt (gland) openings and ridge sign showed a high k value (k = 0.68 [95% CI 0.64–0.73], k = 0.80 [95% CI 0.75–0.85], k = 0.78 [95% CI 0.64–0.90], respectively). The sensitivity (70.1%) and the specificity (77.0%) of endocervicoscopy for all CIN lesions were lower than colposcopy. Conclusion: Endocervicoscopy turned out to be a good method to identify and grade CIN lesions in a subset of patients where colposcopy was not satisfactory. It allowed us to overcome one of the limits of colposcopy in the evaluation of the squamo-columnar junction and to establish the real extension of the lesion into cervical cancer.

Mandatory colposcopic findings of severe cervical dysplasia. Are there key-signs that need our special attention?

IntroductionTo test for colposcopic differences between CIN2+ and non CIN2+ lesions of the “major changes” of the RIO 2011 nomenclature of the International Federation of Cervical Pathology (IFCPC). Material and methodsRetrospective cohort analysis of colposcopic examinations of patients with histologically confirmed CIN2+ (n=99) and non CIN2+ (n=102) lesions during a four years period. Main outcome measures: leukoplakia, coarse mosaic and punctuation, dense acetowhitening, sharp boarders, ridge sign, atypical vessels. ResultsOnly coarse punctuation (P≤0.001; OR 9.64; 95% CI 2.15–43.13), coarse mosaic (P≤0.001; OR 4.00; 95% CI 1.83–8.73) and dense acetowhitening (P≤0.05; OR 1.86; 95% CI 1.06–3.26) occurred more frequently in CIN2+ lesions which were confirmed as predictors by a regression analysis. ConclusionsOnly coarse punctuation and coarse mosaic followed by dense acetowhitening as part of the “major changes” of the IFCPC Rio 2011 nomenclature achieve predictive values for CIN2+ lesions and should be therefore emphasized in colposcopy.

Correlation between VITOM(®) videocolposcopy and histopathology for pathognomonic grading criteria.

"Every colposcopic criterion must be mirrored by histopathology". We investigated the histomorphologic equivalent of four colposcopic criteria, which are associated with CIN 2 and/or CIN 3 and therefore called pathognomonic. We diagnosed inner border sign, ridge sign, rag sign and/or cuffed gland openings using VITOM(®) videocolposcopy in 255 patients which are consistent with major change. Histopathologic examination included immunohistochemical staining for p16, Ki 67 and stathmin-1 and micro-photographic documentation. The histopathologic pattern specific for each of the four pathognomonic colposcopic criteria was reproducibly identified: inner border sign showed a sharp demarcation between low- and high-grade CIN, in ridge sign high-grade CIN adjoined directly the squamocolumnar junction, in rag sign, high-grade CIN was detached from stroma, and in cuffed gland openings, the entrance to a gland was rimmed by CIN, respectively. In 255 patients, the leading pathognomonic sign was inner border in 12.1 %, ridge in 34.1 %, rag in 18 %, and cuffed glands in 35.7 %, respectively. Inner border sign, ridge sign, rag sign and/or cuffed gland openings were associated with CIN 2 or 3 in 97, 98, 98 and 98 %, respectively. In 153 out of 255 patients, we found a combination of pathognomonic signs with ridge sign being the most frequent combined criterion (in 21 % of patients as second pathognomonic sign). The morphology of the four pathognomonic colposcopic criteria, inner border sign, ridge sign, rag sign and cuffed crypt openings, is reproduced in histopathology. These criteria are highly associated with CIN 2 or CIN 3.

Clinical relevance of objectifying colposcopy.

To evaluate the clinical value of four objective colposcopic criteria inner border, ridge sign, cuffed crypt openings and rag sign to diagnose cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse (CIN 2+), using video exoscopy and to compare it to subjective graduating signs. Retrospective evaluation of video recordings of 444 patients, referred for diagnostic colposcopy, who underwent cervical biopsies, and if indicated loop excisions. Most severe histological diagnosis was recorded. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and likelihood ratios (LR) with 95% confidence interval, for CIN 2+ were calculated. Single biopsy, two biopsies and magnification-guided loop excision were performed in 60.8, 39.2 and 70.5% of patients, respectively. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV to detect CIN 2+ were 19.3, 99.2, 98.3 and 35.8%, for inner border sign; 53.1, 93.5, 94.7 and 47.6%, for ridge sign; 51.5, 84.9, 88.2, and 44.3%, for cuffed crypt openings, and 40.7, 96.4, 96.1 and 42.5%, for rag sign, respectively. The positive likelihood ratio (LR+) was 26.7 and the negative likelihood ratio (LR-) was 0.81, for inner border sign; 8.2 and 0.5, for ridge sign; 3.41 and 0.57 for cuffed crypt openings; and 11.3 and 0.62 for rag sign, respectively. 90% of CIN 2+ had at least one objective sign. Combination of any two objective signs significantly increased the LR of the presence of CIN 2+, and was clinically superior to any combination of graduating signs. Objective colposcopic criteria are clinically useful and significantly associated with CIN 2+.

Umbilication Is a Strong Predictor of High-Grade Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia

This study aimed to assess the diagnostic value of the colposcopic feature of umbilication for detecting high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN 2/3). Study included 430 randomly selected women who underwent conization for CIN 2 or CIN 3. The control group consisted of 102 patients with biopsy-confirmed CIN 1. Colpophotographs and reports from colposcopy examinations from all patients were retrospectively analyzed by 2 independent colposcopy experts with the aim to assess the presence of umbilication. The occurrence of more than 2 mosaic "tiles" with central punctation was considered to be a positive finding regardless of whether the mosaic pattern was coarse or fine. The prevalence of umbilication in CIN 1 and CIN 2/3 respectively was compared. The diagnostic value of umbilication alone and combination of umbilication and/or ridge sign was assessed. Umbilication was detected in 10% and ridge sign in 10.2% of patients with CIN 2/3. Simultaneous presence of umbilication and ridge sign was rare (1.1%). The umbilication solely reached 12% sensitivity, 100% specificity, and 100% positive predictive value for the detection of underlying CIN 2/3. Umbilication is an age-independent colposcopic feature with very high specificity for predicting CIN 2/3.

Validity of the Colposcopic Criteria Inner Border Sign, Ridge Sign, and Rag Sign for Detection of High-Grade Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia

To evaluate the association of three pathognomonic criteria, inner border, ridge sign, and rag sign with high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) using video exoscopy. Retrospective evaluation of video recordings of 335 patients, referred for diagnostic colposcopy, who underwent cervical biopsies, and, if indicated loop excisions, was performed. The most severe histologic diagnosis was recorded. Sensitivity, specificity, positive, negative predictive value, and likelihood ratios for high-grade CIN were calculated. In 285 patients (85%), a single colposcopy directed biopsy was taken; 50 patients (15%) underwent two biopsies. One hundred sixty-two patients (48%) underwent subsequent magnification-guided loop excision. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the inner border to detect high-grade CIN were 20%, 99%, 97.9%, and 34.8%, respectively. The positive likelihood ratio (LR+) was 20.3 and the negative likelihood ratio (LR-) was 0.81. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the ridge sign to detect high-grade CIN were 52.5%, 96.4%, 96.8%, and 46.6%, respectively. The LR+ ratio was 13.2 and the LR- ratio was 0.49. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the rag sign to detect high-grade CIN were 38.4%, 96%, 95.7%, and 40.2%, respectively. The LR+ ratio was 9.7 and the LR- ratio was 0.6. Only the ridge sign showed a correlation with young age. Presence of any two signs significantly increased the LR of the presence of high-grade CIN. The inner border, ridge sign, and the newly defined rag sign are objective, effective colposcopic signs and are significantly associated with high-grade CIN.

2011 Colposcopic Terminology of the International Federation for Cervical Pathology and Colposcopy

New colposcopy terminology was prepared by the Nomenclature Committee of the International Federation of Cervical Pathology and Colposcopy after a critical review of previous terminologies, online discussions, and discussion with national colposcopy societies and individual colposcopists. This document has been expanded to include terminology of both the cervix and vagina. The popular terms "satisfactory colposcopy" and "unsatisfactory colposcopy" have been replaced. The colposcopic examination should be assessed for three variables: 1) adequate or inadequate, with the reason given; 2) squamocolumnar junction visibility; and 3) transformation zone type. Other additions were the localization of the lesion to either inside or outside the transformation zone and determinants of size as well as location of cervical lesions. Two new signs were included in the terminology-the "inner border sign" and "ridge sign." The following definitions have been added: congenital transformation zone, polyp (ectocervical or endocervical), stenosis, congenital anomaly, and posttreatment consequence. In addition, the terminology includes standardization of cervical excision treatment types and cervical excision specimen dimensions. The International Federation of Cervical Pathology and Colposcopy recommends that the 2011 terminology replace all others and be implemented for diagnosis, treatment, and research.

The Colposcopic Feature Ridge Sign Is Associated With the Presence of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia 2/3 and Human Papillomavirus 16 in Young Women

Interobserver and intraobserver correlation between the colposcopic phenomenon ridge sign and its association with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2 or 3, with a specific human papillomavirus (HPV) type, and with the age of the patient. Colpophotographs, cervical smears, and histologic results of punch or cone biopsies of 592 patients were evaluated. Colpophotographs were analyzed retrospectively for the presence or absence of an opaque acetowhite ridge at the squamocolumnar junction (ridge sign) by 3 gynecologists of different experience. Interobserver reliability for colposcopic grading of CIN was between 18.2% and 82.3%. Concerning the ridge sign, interobserver agreement varied between 25.3% and 49.4% according to the observers' experience, and intraobserver reliability varied between 56.4% and 67.5% (Cohen kappa=0.310-0.469). In 83 (14.0%) of 592 patients, a ridge sign was diagnosed by the most experienced investigator. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 or 3 was confirmed histologically in 53 of these 83 women (63.8%). Sensitivity of ridge sign for detection of CIN 2 or 3 was 33.1%; specificity was 93.1%. Women with ridge sign were significantly younger than women with no ridge sign (p< .001). Ridge sign was associated with the presence of HPV 16 (p< .001). Ridge sign is a highly specific marker for CIN 2 or 3 and associated with HPV 16 and young age.