Rib Fixation Research Articles

National Trend of Surgical Stabilization of Rib Fractures: Indications, Approaches, and Disparities

IntroductionRib fractures are among the most frequent injuries in trauma. This study aims to assess the current nationwide trends in operative rib fixation and identify predictors of surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRFs). MethodsA 5-y (2017-2021) retrospective analysis of the Trauma Quality Improvement Program database was performed. Adult trauma patients who had at least one rib fracture were included. We analyzed data regarding type of SSRF including open and thoracoscopic approaches and its trends. ResultsA total of 780,275 patients were identified, of which 15,339 patients (1.9%) were managed with SSRF. Trends of both open and endoscopic approaches were increasing during the study period. Patients with ≤2 rib fractures had a decreasing rate of SSRF. Flail chest (odds ratio = 13.42, P < 0.001) was the strongest predictor of SSRF. ConclusionsSSRF is gaining popularity in the management of chest trauma. The presence of a flail segment and multiplicity of rib fractures is among the predictors of SSRF.

Comparison of patients who meet criteria for surgical stabilization of rib fractures versus those who actually get rib fixation: A single center review

BackgroundSurgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF) has shown benefits for rib fracture patients. However, the incidence of SSRF performed remains low. We compare our institution's rib fracture patients meeting criteria for SSRF versus those actually receiving the operation, hypothesizing a significant portion are not undergoing SSRF. MethodsA retrospective review of rib fracture patients presenting to our Level 1 trauma center from 1/2016 to 4/2023. Patients were categorized as those who met SSRF inclusion criteria versus those who didn't based on the 2023 Chest Wall Injury Society (CWIS) SSRF Guidelines. Basic demographics were obtained. Patients meeting SSRF criteria were divided into those who received SSRF versus those who didn't. Outcomes of interest included type and frequency of SSRF indications and frequency of absolute/relative contraindications. Descriptive statistics were used. Median test and t-test were used for statistical analysis. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. ResultsA total of 3,432 patients presented with ≥1 rib fracture(s). Of those, 1,573(45.8 %) met SSRF inclusion criteria. These patients were predominantly male, with mean age of 57.4(±18.5) and a similar Injury Severity Score but significantly higher chest-Abbreviated Injury Score of 3 (Interquartile range 3,4)(p = 0.048). Only 458(29.1 %) patients underwent SSRF, leaving 1,115(70.9 %) managed non-operatively, of which 215(19.3 %) were ventilated and “failure to wean from the ventilator” was the most common (81.4 %) indication for SSRF. Of the 900(80.7 %) non-ventilated patients managed non-operatively, 659 (69.9 %) had ≥two indications for SSRF, 382(34.3 %) had zero relative contraindications and 394(35.3 %) had one relative contraindication for SSRF. Lastly, 52.6 % of patients in this cohort had reported “clicking/popping” of their fractures. ConclusionOnly 29.1 % of patients meeting criteria for SSRF had the operation based on data from our institution. There may be additional opportunity to benefit this cohort of patients meeting SSRF criteria but not undergoing surgery.

Rare Complication of RIB Fracture and Fixatıon With non-Classical Method

The vast majority of all chest traumas are blunt traumas. In blunt traumas, serious intrathoracic intrapleural complications such as pneumothorax, hemothorax, hemopneumothorax may be observed whether or not accompanied by rib fractures, and in some cases, thoracic wall hemorrhages may be observed rarely at a level that severely impairs vital values. In our case, we presented a patient who developed secondary to multiple rib fractures, no intrapleural complications were observed, vital values were severely impaired due to diffuse bleeding in the serratus anterior muscle, which is a very rare complication, and we performed rib fixation with a non-classical method (intrathoracic extrapleural approach).

Awareness and management of slipping rib syndrome

Slipping Rib Syndrome (SRS) is a clinical condition caused by the instability of the costochondral junction, primarily affecting the lower ribs (8th, 9th, and 10th). This syndrome results in severe, often intermittent chest pain due to intercostal nerve entrapment. Diagnosing SRS can be challenging as symptoms often mimic other causes of chest pain. Key clinical features include sharp lower rib pain exacerbated by movement, tenderness on palpation, and pain provoked by the Hooking maneuver. Recent advances in diagnosis and treatment have been highlighted in the literature. Ultrasound has proven effective in confirming SRS diagnosis non-invasively, while surgical interventions offer excellent pain relief, with new diagnostic signs such as reduced rectus abdominis muscle thickness being proposed. Treatment ranges from intercostal nerve blocks and botulinum toxin injections for symptomatic relief to surgical excision of affected costal cartilage for more severe cases. Minimally invasive rib fixation and costal cartilage excision have shown success, providing less invasive options with faster recovery. Continued research and awareness are essential for improving SRS diagnosis and treatment, significantly enhancing patient quality of life.

Benefits of Rib Fixation Utilizing Low-Cost Materials: A Randomized Pilot Trial

IntroductionSurgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF) using standard rib plating systems has become a norm in developed countries. However, the procedure has not garnered much interest in low–middle-income countries, primarily because of the cost. MethodsThis was a single-center pilot randomized trial. Patients with severe rib fractures were randomized into two groups: SSRF and nonoperative management. SSRF arm patients underwent surgical fixation in addition to the tenets of nonoperative management. Low-cost materials like stainless steel wires and braided polyester sutures were used for fracture fixation. The primary outcome was to assess the duration of hospital stay. ResultsTwenty-two patients were randomized, 11 in each arm. Per-protocol analysis showed that the SSRF arm had significantly reduced duration of hospital stay (22.6 ± 19.1 d versus 7.9 ± 5.7 d, P value 0.031), serial pain scores at 48 h and 5 d (median score 5, IQR (3-6) versus median score 7, IQR (6.5-8), P value 0.004 at 48 h and median score 2 IQR (2-3) versus median score 7 IQR (4.5-7) P value 0.0005 at 5 d), significantly reduced need for injectable opioids (9.9 ± 3.8 mg versus 4.4 ± 3.4 mg, P value 0.003) and significantly more ventilator-free days (19.9 ± 8.7 d versus 26.4 ± 3.2 d, P value 0.04). There were no statistically significant differences in the total duration of ICU stay (median number of days 2, IQR 1-4.5 versus median number of days 7, IQR 1-14, P value 0.958), need for tracheostomy (36.4% versus 0%, P value 0.155), and pulmonary and pleural complications. ConclusionsSSRF with low-cost materials may provide benefits similar to standard rib plating systems and can be used safely in resource-poor settings.

Cadaveric Simulation in Rib Plating is Beneficial for Helping Surgical Trainees to Assimilate New Technologies.

Rib fixation procedures are being performed more frequently as they have shown multiple advantages over traditional non-operative management in well-selected patients. We have developed a rib-fixation simulation on cadavers for use by surgical residents in attempt to improve their comfort, knowledge and ability to use this new technology. Residents in years 3 through 5 of training attended a rib-fixation simulation course with cadavers. Trauma faculty and representatives of manufacturers of rib-fixation hardware participated. The simulation consisted of groups of residents reviewing anatomy and creating adequate exposure for the entire procedure. Each group created rib fractures in the cadaver, determined which materials were needed, and then performed the rib-fixation procedure. Following the simulation, we surveyed the residents to determine the impact of the structured cadaveric rib fixation-based course on their comfort level. The survey was performed using a four- and five-level Likert questionnaire. The results were analyzed using paired t-tests. Of the participating residents, 72% of residents had performed five or fewer rib-fixation procedures in their training in the first cohort, while in the cohort for the following year, 65% had performed 5-10 procedures. The simulation had a statistically significant benefit to the residents' comfort level with rib plating (2.5 versus 3.6, p-value: 0.003). The greatest impact on the comfort level was seen in year 3 of training (2 versus 4, p-value 0.02). One hundred percent of residents found that having faculty and representatives present for the simulation was very helpful. The survey demonstrated that most residents gained new knowledge regarding the anatomy and technical dissection. In 20 of 25 encounters, residents strongly agreed that this simulation was beneficial for their surgical education, when used in addition to real operative experience. Every resident reported that they would recommend the simulation to younger resident classes. Rib-fixation simulations on cadavers were beneficial for surgical residents' self-assessed comfort level. The simulation increased residents' knowledge, comfort, and ability to perform rib-fixation procedures. We have seen a significant increase in resident participation in these cases after simulation training. Based on these findings, we will continue to incorporate these simulations into our program's curriculum.

The application of electrical impedance tomography and surgical outcomes of thoracoscope-assisted surgical stabilization of rib fractures in severe chest trauma

Serious blunt chest trauma usually induces hemothorax, pneumothorax, and rib fractures. More studies have claimed that early video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery with surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF) results in a good prognosis in patients with major trauma. This study aimed to verify the outcomes in patients with chest trauma whether SSRF was performed. Consecutive patients who were treated in a medical center in Taiwan, for traumatic events between January 2015 and June 2020, were retrospectively reviewed. This study focused on patients with major trauma and thoracic injuries, and they were divided into groups based on whether they received SSRF. We used electrical impedance tomography (EIT) to evaluate the change of ventilation conditions. Different scores used for the evaluation of trauma severity were also compared in this study. Among the 8396 patients who were included, 1529 (18.21%) had major trauma with injury severity score > 16 and were admitted to the intensive care unit initially. A total of 596 patients with chest trauma were admitted, of whom 519 (87%) survived. Younger age and a lower trauma score (including injury severity scale, new injury severity score, trauma and injury severity score, and revised trauma score) account for better survival rates. Moreover, 74 patients received SSRF. They had a shorter intensive care unit (ICU) stay (5.24, p = 0.045) and better performance in electrical impedance tomography (23.46, p < 0.001). In patients with major thoracic injury, older age and higher injury survival scale account for higher mortality rate. Effective surgical stabilization of rib fractures shortened the ICU stay and helped achieve better performance in EIT. Thoracoscope-assisted rib fixation is suggested in severe trauma cases.

The Effects of Pulmonary Risk Factors and Combination Thoracic Osseous Fractures on Mortality and Outcomes of Surgical Stabilization of Rib Fractures.

Rib fixation for traumatic rib fractures is advocated to decrease morbidity and mortality in select patient populations. We intended to investigate the effect of combination osseous thoracic injuries on mortality with the hypothesis that combination injuries will worsen overall mortality and that SSRF will improve outcomes in combination injuries and in high-risk patients. Patients with rib fractures were identified from the Trauma Quality Improvement Project registry from 2019. Patients were then divided into rib fracture(s) alone or in combination with sternal, thoracic vertebra, or scapula fracture. Patients were also categorized into those with COPD and smokers. Patients with AIS >3 outside of thorax were excluded. Patients were subcategorized into those who had rib fixation verse nonoperative management for all subgroups. Analysis was performed to evaluate the efficacy of rib fixation. A total of 111,066 patients were included for analysis. The overall mortality was 1.4%. Patients with COPD had over double the mortality risk, with an overall mortality of 3.4%. Combination injuries did not appear to increase mortality. SSRF did not decrease mortality; however, the number of patients in this group was too small to complete statistical analysis. The overall complication rate was 0.43%. There was a trend towards an increase in extrapulmonary complications in the group that underwent surgical fixation. Mortality from rib fractures with concomitant osseous thoracic fracture appears to be low. However, mortality is increased in patients with COPD regardless of rib fracture pattern. The number of patients who underwent SSRF was too small to make a statistical comparison.

Thoracic cavity irrigation prevents retained hemothorax and decreases surgical intervention in trauma patients.

Retained hemothorax (HTX) is a common complication following thoracic trauma. Small studies demonstrate the benefit of thoracic cavity irrigation at the time of tube thoracostomy (TT) for the prevention of retained HTX. We sought to assess the effectiveness of chest irrigation in preventing retained HTX leading to a secondary surgical intervention. We performed a single-center retrospective study from 2017 to 2021 at a Level I trauma center, comparing bedside thoracic cavity irrigation via TT versus no irrigation. Using the trauma registry, patients with traumatic HTX were identified. Exclusion criteria were TT placement at an outside hospital, no TT within 24 hours of admission, thoracotomy or video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) prior to or within 6 hours after TT placement, VATS as part of rib fixation or diaphragmatic repair, and death within 96 hours of admission. Bivariate and multivariable analyses were conducted. A total of 370 patients met the inclusion criteria, of whom 225 (61%) were irrigated. Patients who were irrigated were more likely to suffer a penetrating injury (41% vs. 30%, p = 0.03) and less likely to have a flail chest (10% vs. 21%, p = 0.01). On bivariate analysis, irrigation was associated with lower rates of VATS (6% vs. 19%, p < 0.001) and retained HTX (10% vs. 21%, p < 0.001). The irrigated cohort had a shorter TT duration (4 vs. 6 days, p < 0.001) and hospital length of stay (7 vs. 9 days, p = 0.04). On multivariable analysis, thoracic cavity irrigation had lower odds of VATS (adjusted odds ratio, 0.37; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.30-0.54), retained HTX (adjusted odds ratio, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.25-0.74), and a shorter TT duration ( β = -1.58; 95% CI, -2.52 to -0.75). Our 5-year experience with thoracic irrigation confirms findings from smaller studies that irrigation prevents retained HTX and decreases the need for surgical intervention. Therapeutic/Care Management; Level III.

Fixation devices made of poly-L-lactide composite for rib reconstruction after thoracotomy

GRAND FIX mesh-type plates and pins (Gunze, Kyoto, Japan) are thin, bioabsorbable fixation devices made of poly-L-lactide (PLLA) composite. These devices are new, and how best to use them in clinical practice remains to be determined. Thus, we describe our approach to rib fixation after thoracotomy in an aortic surgery using GRAND FIX mesh-type plates and pins. The advantage of our approach is that it is easy to perform, but careful attention should be paid to fix the ribs appropriately.

Outcomes of Surgical Rib Plating: A Case Series.

Rib fractures are a common result of blunt thoracic trauma. Complications of rib fractures include pneumothorax, hemothorax, respiratory failure, and death. The conservative management of rib fractures has been the mainstay of care with surgical rib fixation as a secondary management only performed in complicated flail segments. The purpose of this retrospective study is to describe the outcomes of six patients who underwent surgical rib fixation following a traumatic injury at a Level 1 trauma center. All care for these cases was performed at Desert Regional Medical Center in Palm Springs, CA. On average, patients stayed 12.3 total days in the hospital and 4.6 in the intensive care unit. Out of the six patients, only one required prolonged respiratory support eventually resulting in respiratory failure and death. This retrospective study on surgical rib fixation highlights the importance of early surgical intervention and the need for more general and trauma surgeons to be familiar with the procedure itself.

One-year Results of Minimally Invasive Sutured Fixation of the Slipped Ribs in the Pediatric Population

PurposeCostal cartilage resection with or without rib resection is the gold standard surgery for slipping rib syndrome. Minimally invasive restoration of normal anatomy via nonabsorbable sutures has been described in the adult population with encouraging results. We sought to assess the efficacy of minimally invasive sutured fixation of the hypermobile rib in the pediatric population. MethodsA retrospective review was performed at Mayo Clinic involving 31 pediatric patients diagnosed with slipped rib syndrome. Minimally invasive sutured open reduction internal fixation was performed between 2020 and 2022. The standardized Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire was given at dedicated time points pre- and post-operatively to assess efficacy. Significance was determined via the Wilcoxon rank sum test. ResultsSRS was diagnosed clinically in 31 patients (24 females, 7 males, 1220 years-old). Symptoms were present for an average of 18.9 months and patients had seen an average of 4.7 specialists. Traumatic causes were identified in three patients and eight patients had hypermobility. At one month follow up, there were no surgical complications and patients reported significantly less pain (p < 0.001). Preoperative analgesics reduced by 80%. Ultimately, seven patients underwent a second operation; three patients underwent a third operation; one patient underwent five total operations. Recurrent pain was reported in six patients. Only nine patients followed-up at 1-year post-operation. ConclusionPediatric patients with SRS demonstrated an early positive response to suture fixation without costal cartilage excision. Reoperation and recurrent pain, however, remain significant in this population. Level of EvidenceLevel IV. Type of StudyCase series with no comparison group.

Response to Comment on: "Randomized Controlled Trial of Surgical Rib Fixation to Nonoperative Management in Severe Chest Wall Injury".

Response to Comment on: "Randomized Controlled Trial of Surgical Rib Fixation to Nonoperative Management in Severe Chest Wall Injury".

Clinical effect of the internal fixation for rib fracture with single utility port complete video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery

BackgroundsThe internal fixation for rib fracture with single-operation-port (two ports) complete video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) is a promising surgical approach for treating multiple rib fractures. The study aimed to investigate the minimally invasive surgical procedure’s clinical effect in treating multiple rib fractures.MethodsSeventy-three patients with multiple rib fractures were divided into two groups according to surgical procedure. In the study group, 42 patients were operated on with the internal fixation of rib fracture with single-operation-port complete VATS. In the control group, this study performed the open operative internal fixation for rib fracture with traditional thoracotomy on 31 patients. The surgical-related indexes were retrospectively analyzed. These included the operative time, the intraoperative blood loss, the drainage amount of the chest tube, the placement time of the chest tube, the postoperative hospital stay, the incidence of postoperative complications, the imaging efficacy of rib fixation of rib fractures, and visual analog scale of pain scoring (VAS scoring).ResultsThere was no difference in the operative time between the study and control groups (P = 0.806). The intraoperative blood loss, the chest tube drainage amount, the chest tube placement time, the postoperative hospital stay, and the incidence of postoperative complications in the study group were lower than those in the control group (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the imaging efficacy of rib fixation of rib fractures between the two groups (P = 0.806). VAS scores in the study group on the seventh postoperative day were significantly reduced compared with the control group (P = 0.026).ConclusionThe internal fixation for rib fractures with single-operation-port complete VATS is a feasible, safe, simple, and minimally invasive surgical procedure to treat multiple rib fractures, which is worthy of clinical application.

Comment on: "Randomized Controlled Trial of Surgical Rib Fixation to Nonoperative Management in Severe Chest Wall Injury".

Comment on: "Randomized Controlled Trial of Surgical Rib Fixation to Nonoperative Management in Severe Chest Wall Injury".

Results of rib fixation in treating rib fractures at Dong Nai General Hospital

Introduction&#x0D; Rib fractures are a common complication of chest trauma. Fractured rib fixation is an effective method in treating complicated rib fractures, especially cases with flail chest. This study aimed to evaluate the results and effectiveness of rib fixation surgery at Dong Nai General Hospital.&#x0D; Methods&#x0D; This is an analytical descriptive cross-sectional study, conducted at Dong Nai general hospital from 2022 to 2023.&#x0D; Results&#x0D; The study included 34 patients, 79% were male, 75% of ruptures were caused by traffic accidents. Lesions on the left side are more common than the right side (55.9% vs 32.4%), posterior arch fractures are the most common (88.2%), 41.2% have flail chests. Concomitant injuries consisted of pneumothorax (70.6%), hemothorax (76.5%) and pulmonary contusion (64.7%). Average operating time was 115.1 ± 39.5 minutes, average postoperative time was 10.12 ± 3.15 days. There was 1 case of reoperation due to pleural blood clots. We assessed the pain relief effectiveness by comparing the pain scale before and after surgery, there was a significant difference (7.47 ± 0.75 vs 3.35 ± 0.81, p &lt; 0.001).&#x0D; Conclusion&#x0D; Rib fixation surgery is a safe and effective surgery in treating cases of complex rib fractures and flail chest. This can be implemented in provincial hospitals. Fixing more than 50% of broken ribs will help patients recover better and return to their daily work sooner.

Benefits of routine uniportal thoracoscopy during rib fixation in the diagnosis and repair of diaphragmatic injury

Benefits of routine uniportal thoracoscopy during rib fixation in the diagnosis and repair of diaphragmatic injury

Surgical Rib Fixation is Associated With Lower Mortality in Patients With Traumatic Rib Fractures

IntroductionNonoperative management (NOM) along with supportive care has been the adopted approach for traumatic rib fractures; however, surgical approaches have emerged recently to treat this common pathology. Despite this, there are no guidelines for surgical rib fixation in patients with traumatic rib fractures. MethodsAn institutional review board–approved retrospective cohort study was performed at the Puerto Rico Trauma Hospital aiming to compare the outcomes and complications between patients with traumatic rib fractures who undergo surgical fixation and their counterparts with NOM. The study period comprised from January 2016 through July 2020. Outcomes were evaluated with negative binomial and logistic regressions. ResultsFifty patients were identified for the surgical rib fixation group, who were matched to 150 patients who received NOM. The majority of patients were male (91.5%), with a median (interquartile range) age of 53 (29) years. Concomitant chest injuries were significantly more prevalent in the operative group, such as flail segment (P < 0.001), number of fractures (P < 0.001), and displaced rib fractures (P < 0.001). Although hospital length of stay was 25% (95% confidence interval: 1.02-1.54) longer in the surgical group, this intervention was associated with an 85% (95% confidence interval: 0.03-0.70) lower mortality rate when compared to conservative management. ConclusionsRib fixation may offer some benefits in selected patients with traumatic rib fractures, such as those with bilateral rib fractures, multiple displaced rib fractures, flail segment, and concomitant thoracic injuries. This study may serve as a guide for treatment strategy and patient selection regarding the surgical management of traumatic rib fractures.

A Review of Slipping Rib Syndrome: Diagnostic and Treatment Updates to a Rare and Challenging Problem.

Slipping rib syndrome (SRS) is a disorder that occurs when one or more of the eighth through tenth ribs become abnormally mobile. SRS is a poorly understood condition leading to a significant delay in diagnosis and therapeutic management. History and a physical exam are usually sufficient for a diagnosis of SRS. The utility of dynamic ultrasounds has also been studied as a useful diagnostic tool. Multiple surgical techniques for SRS have been described within the literature. Cartilage rib excision (CRE) has been the most common technique utilized. However, the literature has shown a high rate of recurrence and associated risks with the procedure. More recently, minimally invasive rib fixation and costal cartilage excision with vertical rib plating have been shown as successful and safe alternative techniques. This may be an effective, alternative approach to CRE in adult and pediatric populations with SRS.

Management of chest trauma in a District General Hospital - Audit of current practice

Abstract Aim Audit the management of chest trauma in a District General Hospital according to guidelines set by the regional major trauma centre (MTC). Methods Patients admitted with traumatic rib fractures over a six-month period were included. Clinical notes and imaging were reviewed. Primary outcomes were chest injury severity score (CISS), pain team review and referral to MTC. Secondary outcomes included 30-day readmission and mortality. Results 37 patients were included and only 2 had a CISS calculated on admission. Scores were retrospectively calculated with 89.2% scoring over 11 – the threshold for admission and aggressive management. 28 (75.7%) of patients met the criteria for referral to the MTC for consideration of rib fixation but only 8 were referred. 27 (73.0%) were seen by the pain team and 16 patients received a nerve block. There were 5 patients (13.5%) readmitted within 30 days of discharge with complaints of pain or dyspnoea. 3 were discharged from the emergency department, 2 required an additional inpatient stay. There were 2 deaths (5.4%) within 30 days of discharge. Cause of death was only available for 1 patient who had died of pneumonia. Conclusion Chest trauma has a high morbidity and is often managed by emergency general surgeons in centres without cardiothoracic services. Clear management guidance is vital to improving outcomes. As a result of this audit the trust’s pathway for chest trauma has been updated and new tools developed on our electronic patient record system to facilitate calculation of the CISS and completing the necessary referrals.