Rhythm Control Strategy In Patients Research Articles

Real-World Outcomes of a Rhythm Control Strategy for Atrial Fibrillation Patients with Reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (

Background/Objectives: The effectiveness of a rhythm control strategy in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF < 50%) in real-world practice remains uncertain. Our objective was to evaluate the real-world outcomes of a rhythm control strategy in patients with AF and reduced LVEF, focusing on changes in LV systolic function and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels. Methods: The study retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 80 patients with concurrent AF and reduced LVEF who underwent rhythm control therapy between March 2015 and December 2021. Results: The patients had an average age of 63.6 years and an initial LVEF of 34.3%. Sinus rhythm was restored using anti-arrhythmic drugs (38, 47.5%) or electrical cardioversion (42, 52.5%). Over a follow-up period of 53.0 months, AF recurred in 65% of patients, with 57.7% undergoing catheter ablation. Significant improvements were noted in LVEF (from 34.3% to 55.1%, p < 0.001) and BNP levels (from 752 pg/mL to 72 pg/mL, p < 0.001) at the last follow-up. Nearly all patients (97.5%) continued with the rhythm control strategy during the follow-up period. Conclusions: In real-world settings, a rhythm control strategy proves to be feasible and effective for improving LVEF and reducing BNP levels in AF patients with reduced LVEF.

The effect of amiodarone given periprocedurally on the effectiveness of catheter ablation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation refractory to cardioversion

Abstract Background Rhythm control strategy in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation refractory to electrical cardioversion (AF-REC) poses an important clinical problem. Little is known about the effect of amiodarone therapy given periprocedurally with catheter ablation on maintaining sinus rhythm in this group of patients. Purpose This study aimed to determine whether initial amiodarone therapy introduced prior to AF ablation and continued for one month after the procedure affects the long-term effectiveness of the rhythm control strategy in patients with AF-REC. Methods We conducted a retrospective case-control study of medical records of AF-REC patients treated periprocedurally with amiodarone in addition to pulmonary vein isolation. Data on comorbidities, transthoracic echocardiogram results, and short- and long-term effectiveness of ablation was extracted. Patients were followed up in the out patient clinic with the use of a 72-hour Holter monitoring and telephone interviews. AF recurrence was defined as ≥ 30s episode of atrial tachyarrhythmia. Results The analysis comprised 56 patients: 37 in the amiodarone and 19 in the control group; 12 women, mean age 57 years, mean follow-up of 39.5 months. Amiodarone was discontinued after 1 month at the most after the ablation in all of the patients. The primary endpoint (AF-free survival) was achieved in 17 (45,9%) pts in the amiodarone group and 3 (15,8%) pts in the control group (p=0.026). On multivariable analysis, amiodarone therapy was the only variable correlating with the primary endpoint: OR 6.8 (95% CI: 1.4 - 33.9), p=0.019. Conversion of AF from persistent to paroxysmal or no AF in the follow-up was achieved in 32 pts (86,5%) in the amiodarone group and 9 pts (47,4%) in the control group: OR 8.0 (95% CI: 2.1 - 30.0), p=0.002. Patients in the amiodarone group experienced a borderline better increase of left ventricular ejection fraction: ∆ 5.2% (95% CI: -0.1 - 10.5), p= 0.054. Conclusion Periprocedural use of amiodarone in patients ablated due to persistent atrial fibrillation refractory to electrical cardioversion may lead to significantly better long-term efficacy of catheter ablation in this group of patients.

Catheter-based pulmonary vein isolation fails to prevent transient atrial arrhythmogenic changes related to acute obstructive respiratory events in a porcine model.

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is the corner stone of modern rhythm control strategies in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) is prevalent in more than 50% of patients undergoing AF ablation, and studies have indicated a greater recurrence rate after PVI in patients with SDB. Herein, we study the effect of catheter-based PVI on AF in a pig model for SDB. In 11 sedated spontaneously breathing pigs, obstructive apnoeas were simulated by 75 s of intermittent negative upper airway pressure (INAP) applied by a negative pressure device connected to the endotracheal tube. Intermittent negative upper airway pressures were performed before and after PVI. AF-inducibility and atrial effective refractory periods (aERPs) were determined before and during INAP by programmed atrial stimulation. Pulmonary vein isolation prolonged the aERP by 48 ± 27 ms in the right atrium (RA) (P < 0.0001) and by 40 ± 34 ms in the left atrium (LA) (P = 0.0004). Following PVI, AF-inducibility dropped from 28 ± 26% to 0% (P = 0.0009). Intermittent negative upper airway pressure was associated with a transient aERP-shortening (ΔaERP) in both atria, which was not prevented by PVI (INAP indued ΔaERP after PVI in the RA: -57 ± 34 ms, P = 0.0002; in the LA: -42 ± 24 ms, P < 0.0001). Intermittent negative upper airway pressure was associated with a transient increase in AF-inducibility (from 28 ± 26% to 69 ± 21%; P = 0.0008), which was not attenuated by PVI [INAP-associated AF-inducibility after PVI: 58 ± 33% (P = 0.5)]. Transient atrial arrhythmogenic changes related to acute obstructive respiratory events are not prevented by electrical isolation of the pulmonary veins, which partially explains the increased AF recurrence in patients with SDB after PVI procedures.

Aggressive Rhythm Control Strategy in Atrial Fibrillation Patients Presenting at the Emergency Department: The HEROMEDICUS Study Design and Initial Results.

Atrial fibrillation has progressively become a more common reason for emergency department visits, representing 0.5% of presenting reasons. Registry data have indicated that about 60% of atrial fibrillation patients who present to the emergency department are admitted, emphasizing the need for more efficient management of atrial fibrillation in the acute phase. Management of atrial fibrillation in the setting of the emergency department varies between countries and healthcare systems. The most plausible reason to justify a conservative rather than an aggressive strategy in the management of atrial fibrillation is the absence of specific guidelines from diverse societies. Several trials of atrial fibrillation treatment strategies, including cardioversion, have demonstrated that atrial fibrillation in the emergency department can be treated safely and effectively, avoiding admission. In the present study, we present the epidemiology and characteristics of atrial fibrillation patients presenting to the emergency department, as well as the impact of diverse management strategies on atrial-fibrillation-related hospital admissions. Lastly, the design and initial data of the HEROMEDICUS protocol will be presented, which constitutes an electrophysiology-based aggressive rhythm control strategy in patients with atrial fibrillation in the emergency department setting.

Effects of rhythm-control and rate-control strategies on cognitive function and dementia in atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Growing evidence suggests that atrial fibrillation (AF) is an independent risk factor for cognitive impairment and dementia, even in the absence of thromboembolic events and stroke. Whether rhythm-control therapy can protect cognitive function remains unclear. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of rhythm-control strategies in patients with AF regarding cognitive function and dementia risk. We systematically searched the PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library databases for randomised clinical trials, cohort and case-control studies evaluating the associations between rhythm-control strategies and cognitive function outcomes up to May 2023. We assessed the risk of bias using the ROBINS-I and the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. Both fixed- and random-effects models were used to create summary estimates of risk. We included a total of 14 studies involving 193,830 AF patients. In the pooled analysis, compared with rate-control, rhythm-control therapy was significantly associated with a lower risk of future dementia (hazard ratio (HR) 0.74; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.62-0.89; I2= 62%). Among the rhythm-control strategies, AF ablation is a promising treatment that was related to significantly lower risks of overall dementia (HR 0.62; 95% CI 0.56-0.68; I2= 42%), Alzheimer's disease (HR 0.78; 95% CI 0.66-0.92; I2= 0%) and vascular dementia (HR 0.58; 95% CI 0.42-0.80; I2= 31%). Pooled results also showed that compared with patients without ablation, those who underwent AF ablation had significantly greater improvement in cognitive score (standardized mean difference (SMD) 0.85; 95% CI 0.30-1.40; P = 0.005; I2 = 76%). Rhythm-control strategies, especially ablation, are effective in protecting cognitive function, reducing dementia risk and thus improving quality of life in AF patients.

Therapeutic inertia in rhythm control strategies in hospitalized patients with fibrillation: Insights from Hellenic Cardiorenal Morbidity Snapshot (HECMOS) study

BackgroundCurrent guidelines recommend a rhythm control strategy in patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF) while catheter ablation has been shown to be a safer and more efficacious approach than antiarrhythmic medications. MethodsHECMOS was a nationwide snapshot survey of cardiorenal morbidity in hospitalized cardiology patients. In this sub-study, we included 276 cases who had a history of AF, particularly on the rhythm strategy, and catheter ablation procedures had been performed before the index admission. ResultsAmong 276 AF patients (mean age: 76.4 ± 11.5 years, 58 % male), 60.9 % (N = 168) had persistent AF and 39.1 % (N = 108) had paroxysmal AF. Heart failure was the main cause of admission in 54.3 % (N = 145) of the patients, while 14.1 % (N = 39) were admitted due to paroxysmal AF, 7.3 % (N = 20) due to bradyarrhythmic reasons, and 6.5 % (N = 18) suffered from acute coronary syndrome. Most importantly, heart failure with reduced ejection fraction was present in 76 (27 %) patients. Only 10 patients out of the total (3 %, mean age 59.7 years) had undergone AF ablation while electrical cardioversion had been attempted in 37 (13.4 %) patients. Interestingly, in this AF population with heart failure, 3.6 % (N = 10) had a defibrillator implanted (4 single-chamber), and only 1.5 % (N = 4) had a cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (CRT-D). ConclusionHigh prevalence of persistent AF was detected in hospitalized patients, with heart failure being the leading cause of admission and main co-morbidity. Rhythm control strategies are notably underused, along with CRT-D implantation in patients with AF and heart failure.

Comparison of early rhythm control strategies in patients with atrial fibrillation: a nationwide population-based cohort study

Abstract Background Early rhythm control within 1-year after atrial fibrillation (AF) diagnosis is associated with a lower risk of major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE). Recently, AF catheter ablation (AFCA) using cryoballoon ablation as initial therapy has been demonstrated to be superior to drug therapy for the prevention of AF recurrence in patients with paroxysmal AF. However, there is still lack of evidence whether AFCA for the method of early rhythm control is superior to medical rhythm control therapy for the reduction of MACE risk. Purpose To evaluate the association between rhythm control treatment and the risk of MACE for early rhythm control in AF patients Methods Using a Korean nationwide claims database, patients with AF who received rhythm control therapy including antiarrhythmic agents (AAD), direct current cardioversion (DCC), and AF catheter ablation (AFCA, radiofrequency ablation or cryoballoon ablation) within 1-year after AF onset between 2011 and 2020 were included. According to rhythm control treatment, patients were categorized two groups as follow: (1) medical rhythm control group who prescribed AAD or underwent DCC, and (2) AFCA group who underwent radiofrequency or cryoballoon ablation. The primary outcome was MACE, the composite of ischemic stroke, admission for heart failure (HF), and myocardial infarction (MI). For the safety outcome, the composite of cardiac tamponade, syncope, sick sinus syndrome, atrioventricular block, pacemaker implantation, and sudden cardiac arrest was evaluated. Multivariable Cox regression analysis were performed. Results A total of 229,056 pateints were included (mean age 67.3±13.6 and 59.4% of men). Mean duration from new AF diagnosis to rhythm control treatment was 29.1±69.2 days. Among total, 221,952 patients received medical rhythm control and 7104 patients received AFCA. Compared to medical rhythm control group, AFCA group was associated with lower risks of ischemic stroke, admission for HF, and MI (adjusted hazard ratio [95% confidence interval]: 0.342 [0.287-0.408], p&amp;lt;0.001 for ischemic stroke, 0.356 [0.282-0.451], p&amp;lt;0.001 for admission for HF, and 0.640 [0.452-0.906], p=0.011 for MI) (Figure A). AFCA for early rhythm control showed a significantly lower risk of MACE than medical early rhythm control (0.328 [0.283-0.380], p&amp;lt;0.001, Figure A). Compared to medical rhythm control, AFCA showed a similar risk for safety outcome (1.197 [0.920-1.556], p=0.180). Among AFCA group, cryoballoon ablation showed comparable risks of ischemic stroke (0.465 [0.113-1.922], p=0.290), admission for HF (0.262 [0.035-1.936], p=0.189), MI (0.823 [0.100-6.767], p=0.856), and MACE (0.449 [0.164-1.228], p=0.118) with radiofrequency ablation (Figure B). Conclusion Regarding on the method of early rhythm control for AF, catheter ablation of AF might reduce the risk of MACE without a significant increase of safety outcome to medical rhythm control. Further results from randomized clinical trials are needed.

Expert Consensus on Comprehensive Early Rhythm Control in Addition to Guideline-Based Care for Atrial Fibrillation: A Modified Delphi Survey

Atrial fibrillation (AF) practice guidelines recommend a rhythm-control strategy to improve symptoms and quality of life, noting the side effects of antiarrhythmic drugs and catheter ablation. Emerging evidence indicates that comprehensive early rhythm control with antiarrhythmic drugs or catheter ablation is associated with a lower risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes versus the usual care. Using an online modified Delphi survey approach, perspectives and expert consensus among electrophysiologists were examined through a series of ranking and likelihood questions around treatment decision-making on (1) the use of comprehensive early rhythm-control strategies in patients with AF based on guidelines and emerging research and (2) treatment selection factors. A panel of 17 electrophysiologists reached a consensus on using early rhythm control (median 90, interquartile range 14) based on the view that early intervention improved cardiovascular outcomes (mean rank 1.6 of 3, 82% within 1 SD) and symptoms (1.8 of 3, 41%). AF-related symptoms were identified as the most important in making a treatment initiation decision (1.1 of 7, 88%), followed by AF type (2.5 of 7, 82%). Participants were most likely to initiate treatment at AF symptom onset (median 80; interquartile range 6). In making treatment selection decisions, participants ranked short-term/long-term safety (1.9 of 7, 88%) and efficacy (1.8 of 7, 53%) as the top 2 considerations. In conclusion, experts were in favor of early rhythm control; however, additional research is needed to address the role that early rhythm-control strategies play in current AF treatment management algorithms.

Safety and effectiveness of very-high-power, short-duration ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation: Preliminary results

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is at the forefront of rhythm control strategies in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). A very-high-power, short-duration (vHPSD) catheter was designed to improve the effectiveness of AF ablation within a shorter procedure time. We aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of PVI ablation between this vHPSD ablation mode (90W/4s) and conventional index-guided ablation (up to 40W/indexed). Methods This single-center, retrospective, observational study enrolled 148 patients with AF, referred for catheter ablation between December 16, 2019 and July 29, 2022. In 77 procedures (mean age: 59.7±12.0 years; 61.0% male; 74.0% paroxysmal), a vHPSD catheter was used (vHPSD-group), and 71 patients (mean age: 58.1±11.6 years; 70.4% male; 67.6% paroxysmal) were treated with a ablation index catheter (AI-group). The study assessed the recurrence of AF at 3- and 6-months after ablation. The outcomes also included the amount of opioids administered during the procedure and the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events. Additionally, procedural factors, such as total procedure time, fluoroscopy time and radiofrequency application time were compared between the groups. Results At 3 months, AF was found to recur in 14.29% (11/77) of patients in the vHPSD-group and in 30.99% (22/71) of patients in the AI-group (p=0.02). At 6 months, 18.31% (13/71) patients reported AF recurrence in the vHPSD-group and 32.73 % (18/55) in the AI-group (p=0.09). There was no difference in treatment-emergent adverse events between the two groups (3.9% vs. 2.8%; p=1.00). One severe adverse event (a cerebral vascular accident) was observed in the vHPSD-group. The mean dose of remifentanil was reported to be lower during vHPSD-based PVI (p&amp;lt;0.0001). The vHPSD-based PVI was associated with shorter radiofrequency application time (p&amp;lt;0.0001), fluoroscopy time (p&amp;lt;0.0001), and total procedure time (p&amp;lt;0.0001). Conclusions This study suggests that the vHPSD-quided PVI is equally effective and safe with reference to short-term clinical observation as conventional ablation. Also, the vHPSD ablation may allow to reduce the dosage of analgesics during significantly shorter procedures.

Choice of sinus rhythm control strategy in patients with atrial fibrillation: why, when and how? A review

After 20 years of dubious notions of parity between sinus rhythm control and ventricular rate control strategies in patients with atrial fibrillation, there is evidence of the prognostic superiority of the former. The review article presents the results of randomized trials that support early rhythm control in patients with atrial fibrillation, possible pharmacological and non-pharmacological methods of such treatment in real clinical practice.

Atrio-ventricular nodal ablation with biventricular pacing in atrial fibrillation with narrow QRS – a novel strategy to reduce mortality independent of underling left ventricular function.

Historically, clinical studies have demonstrated conflicting results for rate-control versus rhythm-control strategy in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation (AF) in terms of long-term mortality and morbidity. The concept of atrioventricular (AV) nodal ablation coupled with permanent biventricular pacing has recently been advocated as the closest approach to obtain a physiological reset especially in AF patients having underlying ventricular dysfunction. Herein, we present a critical analysis and detailed review based on prior and currently available evidence based on the ablation in permanent atrial fibrillation – cardiac resynchronization therapy (APAF-CRT) mortality trial.

Safety and effectiveness of very-high-power, short-duration ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation: Preliminary results.

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is at the forefront of rhythm control strategies in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). A very-high-power, short-duration (vHPSD) catheter, QDot MicroTM (Biosense Webster) was designed to improve the effectiveness of AF ablation within a shorter procedure time. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness and safety of PVI ablation between this vHPSD ablation mode and conventional ablation-index-guided ablation (ThermoCool Smarttouch SF catheter). This single-center, retrospective, observational study enrolled 108 patients with AF, referred for catheter ablation between December 16, 2019 and December 3, 2021. In 54 procedures (mean age: 58.0 ± 12.3; 66.67% male), a QDot MicroTM catheter was used (vHPSD-group), and 54 patients (mean age: 57.2 ± 11.8; 70.37% male) were treated with a ThermoCool SmarttouchTM SF catheter (AI-group). The primary endpoint was freedom from AF 3 months after ablation. Atrial fibrillation was found to recur in 14.81% of patients in the vHPSD-group and in 31.48% of patients in the AI-group (p = 0.07). There was no difference in treatment-emergent adverse events between the two groups (6.3% vs. 0%; p = 0.10). One severe adverse event (a cerebral vascular accident) was observed in the vHPSD-group. The mean dose of remifentanil was reported to be lower during QDot MicroTM catheter-based PVI (p < 0.01). The vHPSD-based PVI was associated with shorter radiofrequency application time (p < 0.001), fluoroscopy time (p < 0.0001), and total procedure time (p < 0.0001). This study suggests vHPSD ablation is safe, can reduce the dosage of analgesics during significantly shorter procedures and may enhance the success rate of catheter-based PVI.

Sex differences in the use of rhythm control strategies in patients with atrial fibrillation in FinACAF study

Abstract Aim Women with atrial fibrillation (AF) have been reported to receive less antiarrhythmic therapies (AAT) than men. We assessed sex differences in AAT use in Finland. Methods The FinACAF registry linked data from several nationwide registries covering all levels of care in addition to drug purchases and included records on all patients diagnosed with incident AF in Finland during 2007–2018. The outcomes of interest (use of antiarrhythmic drugs (AAD), cardioversions (CV), catheter ablation procedures and any AAT including all aforementioned rhythm control modalities) were identified based on procedure-specific codes and drug purchases. Sex differences in AAT use were analyzed in the entire cohort and separately in three age groups: &amp;lt;65 years, 65–74 years and ≥75 years using Fine-Gray subdistribution hazard regression with death as a competing risk and adjustments made for comorbidities, age and levels of income and education. Results Altogether, 229565 patients (50.0% female; mean age 68.90±13.44 in men and 76.57±11.79 in women) with incident AF were identified. In the entire patient population, female sex was associated a higher incidence of AAD use and lower incidence of CVs and ablation procedures contributing to an overall slightly lower incidence of any AAT compared to men (Table 1). In the age group specific analyses, the lower incidence of CVs and higher incidence of AAD use in females were observed only in patients &amp;lt;65 years and &amp;lt;75 years, respectively, whereas the association of female sex with lower incidence of catheter ablation procedures was observed only in the age group ≥75 years. Conclusion Our nationwide data showed no considerable sex difference in overall use of AAT in Finland. Despite a lower number of CVs in women, ablation procedures were performed almost equally and AADs were used more frequently in women compared to men. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: Foundation. Main funding source(s): Sydäntutkimussäätiö

Optimal Rhythm Control Strategy in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation.

For almost 20 years, data regarding the effect of rhythm control therapy for atrial fibrillation (AF) on cardiovascular prognosis in comparison with rate control therapy has not been conclusive. The safety of rhythm control and anticoagulation therapy has generally improved. Recently, it was revealed that a rhythm-control strategy reduced the risk of adverse cardiovascular events than usual rate control in patients with recent AF (diagnosed within 1 year). Within 1 year after the AF diagnosis, early initiation of rhythm control led to more favorable cardiovascular outcomes than rate control. Early rhythm control reduced the risks of stroke and heart failure-related admission than rate control. Moreover, rhythm control was associated with lower dementia risk than rate control. Finally, early rhythm control treatment was also effective in patients with asymptomatic AF but less effective in older adults. Therefore, in patients with AF, rhythm control should be considered at earlier stages, regardless of symptom.

Machine Learning Methodologies for Prediction of Rhythm-Control Strategy in Patients Diagnosed With Atrial Fibrillation: Observational, Retrospective, Case-Control Study.

BackgroundThe identification of an appropriate rhythm management strategy for patients diagnosed with atrial fibrillation (AF) remains a major challenge for providers. Although clinical trials have identified subgroups of patients in whom a rate- or rhythm-control strategy might be indicated to improve outcomes, the wide range of presentations and risk factors among patients presenting with AF makes such approaches challenging. The strength of electronic health records is the ability to build in logic to guide management decisions, such that the system can automatically identify patients in whom a rhythm-control strategy is more likely and can promote efficient referrals to specialists. However, like any clinical decision support tool, there is a balance between interpretability and accurate prediction.ObjectiveThis study aims to create an electronic health record–based prediction tool to guide patient referral to specialists for rhythm-control management by comparing different machine learning algorithms.MethodsWe compared machine learning models of increasing complexity and used up to 50,845 variables to predict the rhythm-control strategy in 42,022 patients within the University of Colorado Health system at the time of AF diagnosis. Models were evaluated on the basis of their classification accuracy, defined by the F1 score and other metrics, and interpretability, captured by inspection of the relative importance of each predictor.ResultsWe found that age was by far the strongest single predictor of a rhythm-control strategy but that greater accuracy could be achieved with more complex models incorporating neural networks and more predictors for each participant. We determined that the impact of better prediction models was notable primarily in the rate of inappropriate referrals for rhythm-control, in which more complex models provided an average of 20% fewer inappropriate referrals than simpler, more interpretable models.ConclusionsWe conclude that any health care system seeking to incorporate algorithms to guide rhythm management for patients with AF will need to address this trade-off between prediction accuracy and model interpretability.

Real-world applicability and impact of early rhythm control for European patients with atrial fibrillation: a report from the ESC-EHRA EORP-AF Long-Term General Registry

BackgroundUse of rate/rhythm control is essential to control symptoms in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Recently, the EAST-AFNET 4 trial described how early rhythm control strategy was associated with a lower risk of adverse clinical outcomes.ObjectivesThe aim was to evaluate the real-world applicability and impact of an early rhythm control strategy in patients with AF.MethodsUse of an early rhythm control strategy was assessed in a European cohort of AF patients derived from the EHRA-ESC EORP-AF General Long-Term Registry. Early rhythm control was defined as use of antiarrhythmic drugs or cardioversion/catheter ablation. The primary outcome included cardiovascular death, stroke, acute coronary syndrome, and worsening of heart failure. Quality of life and health-care resource usage were also assessed as outcomes.ResultsAmong the 10,707 patients evaluated for eligibility to EAST-AFNET 4, a total of 3774 (34.0%) were included. Early rhythm control was associated with better quality of life, but with greater use of health-care resources. During follow-up, the primary outcome occurred less often in early rhythm control patients than in those with no rhythm control (13.6% vs. 18.5%, p < 0.001). In the multivariate adjusted Cox regression model, no significant difference was found between no rhythm control and early rhythm control, for the primary outcome. No difference in the primary outcome between early rhythm control and ‘no rhythm control patients’ adherent to Atrial fibrillation Better Care (ABC) pathway’ was evident (p = 0.753)ConclusionsUse of an early rhythm control strategy was associated with a lower rate of major adverse events, but this difference was non-significant on multivariate analysis, being mediated by differences in baseline characteristics and clinical risk profile. Early rhythm control was associated with a higher use of health-care resources and risk of hospital admission, despite showing better quality of life.Graphic abstract

Treatment timing and the effects of rhythm control strategy in patients with atrial fibrillation: nationwide cohort study

ObjectiveTo investigate whether the results of a rhythm control strategy differ according to the duration between diagnosis of atrial fibrillation and treatment initiation.DesignLongitudinal observational cohort study.SettingPopulation based cohort from the...

Symptom management strategies: Rhythm vs rate control in patients with atrial fibrillation in the Balkan region: Data from the BALKAN-AF survey.

Symptom-focused management is one of the cornerstones of optimal atrial fibrillation (AF) therapy. To evaluate the use of rhythm control and rate control strategy. Second, to identify predictors of the use of amiodarone in patients with rhythm control and of the use of rhythm control strategy in patients with paroxysmal AF in the Balkans. Prospective enrolment of consecutive patients from seven Balkan countries to the BALKAN-AF survey was performed. Of 2712 enrolled patients, 2522 (93.0%) with complete data were included: 1622 (64.3%) patients were assigned to rate control strategy and 900 (35.7%) to rhythm control. Patients with rhythm control were younger, more often hospitalised for AF and with less comorbidities (all P<.05) than those with rate control. Symptom score [European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA)] was not an independent predictor of a rhythm control strategy [odds ratio (OR) 0.99, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.90-1.10, P=.945]. The most commonly chosen antiarrhythmic agents were amiodarone (49.7%), followed by propafenone (24.3%). More than one-third of patients in the BALKAN-AF survey received a rhythm control strategy, and these patients tended to be younger with less comorbidities than those managed with rate control. EHRA symptom score is not significantly associated with rhythm control strategy. The most commonly used antiarrhythmic agents were amiodarone, followed by propafenone.

Dominant frequency predicts sinus rhythm maintenance after electrical cardioversion for persistent atrial fibrillation in men but not in women

Abstract Background Women are usually underrepresented in studies evaluating rhythm control strategies in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Subsequently, the same holds true for studies looking at predictors for success of a rhythm control strategy for AF. Purpose To study the predictive power of the non-invasively determined dominant frequency (DF) on the electrocardiogram (ECG) in men and women undergoing electrical cardioversion (ECV) for persistent AF. Methods We matched 105 female patients undergoing elective ECV for persistent AF and 105 male control patients based on age and cardiovascular comorbidity profile. We determined the DF on all 12 leads of a standard digital 10 seconds ECG recorded on the day of ECV. Recurrences of AF within the first year after ECV were documented. Results There were no differences in comorbidities, AF duration, left ventricular systolic function, indexed left atrial volume and anti-arrhythmic drugs between male and female patients. The dominant frequency was significantly lower in male patients without an AF recurrence on all leads. The best performing lead to identify patients with recurrences was lead III with an AUC 0.752. The optimal cut-off point was a DF &amp;lt;5.98 Hz with a sensitivity 84% and a specificity 67%. There was no significant difference in DF between female patients with and without an AF recurrence. The AUC in lead III was 0.47 (Figure 1). Conclusion The non-invasively measured dominant frequency is able to predict AF recurrence after electrical cardioversion in male patients with persistent AF but not in a matched female cohort. This difference might be explained by different pathophysiological mechanisms underlying AF in male and female patients. Therefore, future research is needed on pathophysiological differences between men and women that can explain and might overcome these challenges. Figure 1 Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Public grant(s) – EU funding. Main funding source(s): European Network for Translational Research in Atrial Fibrillation (grant no. 261057), the Center for Translational Molecular Medicine (COHFAR),

Rhythm Control of Atrial Fibrillation in Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction.

Atrial fibrillation and heart failure frequently co-exist with an increasing prevalence of atrial fibrillation as ejection fraction decreases. Atrial fibrillation is associated with increased mortality in patients with heart failure. This article will review rhythm and rate control options, ultimately supporting rhythm control via endocardial ablation. Randomized trials of a rhythm control strategy in patients with reduced ejection fraction heart failure have shown significant improvements in ejection fraction, oxygen consumption and also a significant reduction in mortality. The treatment of atrial fibrillation in patients with reduced ejection fraction heart failure should include an early rhythm control strategy via endocardial ablation.