Ten subjects responded in a conventional multiple-choice format to two randomized lists of Diagnostic Rhyme Test (DRT) words in white noise at 3-dB signal-to-noise ratio. The DRT consists of 96 word-pairs whose initial phonemes differ by one feature: voice-unvoiced, nasal-oral, sustained-interrupted, sibilated-unsibilated, grave-acute, and compact-diffuse. List one consisted of DRT words counterbalanced for each feature and list two contained the contrasting feature. Six replicates were obtained for each subject. Errant responses were analyzed for DRT features as well as by a Chomsky-Halle feature system that permitted assigning numerical values that ranged from one to six to phonetic differences in DRT word-pairs. Results are consistent with previous findings for equality of percent correct across DRT word lists. However, DRT feature contrasts within word pairs were not equally difficult. For example, sibilated and unvoiced stimuli were significantly more difficult than their unsibilated or voiced counterpart, respectively. Also, there was no significant correlation between word error rate and the corresponding Chomsky-Halle feature value for differences in word-pairs. Thus, word difficulty appears to be unrelated to degree of feature difference in a word-pair, but rather is associated with relative phoneme audibility for the type of noise employed.