Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation Research Articles

Minimum follow-up for closed rhinoseptoplasties

BackgroundThere is no established consensus on the postoperative follow-up from which the aesthetic and functional outcomes of rhinoseptoplasty are considered as stable. ObjectivesTo contribute to defining the postoperative follow-up from which rhinoseptoplasty outcomes cease to evolve. MethodsPostoperative assessments of Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) and Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation (ROE) scores from 357 closed structural rhinoseptoplasty procedures were prospectively gathered from January 2019 to December 2023. These measurements encompassed the postoperative period from 1 to 12 months. All procedures were performed utilizing closed technique. Results: No statistically significant difference was detected between the scores at 1, 2, and 6 months versus 12 months postoperatively (ROE: p = 0.388; 0.268; 0.162; NOSE: p = 0.265; 0.192; 0.975, Mann-Whitney test). Similarly, no follow-up impact was revealed between the scores at 1, 2, 6, and 12 months postoperatively (ROE: p = 0.548; NOSE: p = 0.280, Kruskal-Wallis test). No significant correlation was established between follow-up (in months) and ROE and NOSE scores (ROE: p = 0.397; NOSE: p = 0.632, Spearman). Conclusion: Follow-up duration does not influence NOSE and ROE scores over the 1- to 12-month timeframe. The 1-month postoperative outcome can be regarded as a reliable indicator of the 12-month outcome. These conclusions apply to NOSE and ROE scores of rhinoseptoplasty conducted using closed technique for the 1- to 12-month period. Further research is needed for open techniques, preservation rhinoplasty, other patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) as well as for the follow-up beyond 12 months postoperatively.

Rhinoplasty Exclusively Utilizing Autologous Costal Cartilage for Patients with Prior Unilateral Cleft Lip Repair.

Rhinoplasty in patients with previous unilateral cleft lip repair is a surgical challenge due to complex nasal deformities, including a horizontally positioned nasal wing, wide cleft side nostrils, nasal base defects, and a short and deviated nasal columella. To comprehensively address these complexities, we exclusively utilized autologous costal cartilage in rhinoplasty procedures, using various surgical techniques. This study presents a comprehensive case series of 39 patients who had previously undergone unilateral cleft lip surgery but still had nasal deformities. Rhinoplasty using autologous costal cartilage was performed at Cho Ray Hospital, Vietnam. Costal cartilage was partially crushed and then finely cut to shape the dorsal area and raise the nasal base on the cleft side. Partially crushed cartilage was also used to shape shield grafts, cap grafts, and alar batten grafts, whereas sliced cartilage was utilized for septal extension grafts. Evaluation was based on improvements in anthropometric indicators, patient satisfaction using Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation (ROE) scale and FACE-Q scores. The average age of patients was 25.13 years. All postoperative anthropometric indicators showed significant improvements. Postsurgery, the total ROE score was three times higher than before surgery (P < 0.001), and the total FACE-Q score was 2.26 times higher (P < 0.001). No significant intraoperative or postoperative complications were observed. This procedure effectively addresses complex nasal deformities in patients with prior unilateral cleft lip repair, emphasizing the value of autologous costal cartilage in rhinoplasty for such individuals.

Bridging the Gap: Understanding Appalachian Patient Satisfaction in Cosmetic Rhinoplasty.

Rhinoplasty is a surgical procedure aimed at correcting both functional and aesthetic nasal deformities, addressing issues such as trauma-induced disfigurements and patient dissatisfaction with nasal appearance. Patient satisfaction is a critical outcome measure in rhinoplasty, reflecting the success of the procedure and the quality of care provided. This study investigates factors influencing patient satisfaction among Appalachian patients undergoing rhinoplasty for aesthetic reasons, considering the unique healthcare challenges faced by rural populations. A modified Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation questionnaire was utilized to assess patient satisfaction. Descriptive statistics and regression analyses were performed to analyze demographic characteristics, complications, re-operations, and satisfaction scores among rural and urban participants. While no significant differences were found in demographic characteristics, trends in satisfaction scores suggest potential disparities between rural and urban populations. Rural patients exhibited marginally lower satisfaction scores and higher rates of complications and re-operations, highlighting the need for targeted interventions in rural healthcare settings. Addressing geographic barriers, enhancing preoperative education and postoperative support, and fostering interdisciplinary collaboration are essential strategies to improve patient satisfaction and outcomes in rhinoplasty procedures, particularly in rural communities. Further research with larger sample sizes and qualitative methods is warranted to explore the underlying factors contributing to patient satisfaction disparities and to inform evidence-based interventions aimed at narrowing healthcare disparities and advancing health equity in rhinoplasty care.

Perception of Rhinoplasty Outcome Utilizing Patients' Photography.

Patient satisfaction with rhinoplasty results is evaluated in a manner of subjective and qualitative values, and to a certain degree, it can indicate successful outcomes in rhinoplasty. The present study was a descriptive study that assessed the rhinoplasty outcome of adult patients who underwent septorhinoplasty between January 2015 and August 2023 at a single center in Saudi Arabia utilizing Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation scores and Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation scores pre-operatively, postoperatively, and postoperatively with showing the patients their photo before surgery. The comparison of Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation scores and Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation scores showed statistically significant with P value of 0.000 when comparing these scores pre-operatively, postoperatively, and postoperatively with showing the patient their photos before surgery. Presenting patients with pre-operative images may help them recognize changes in their clinical appearance and, consequently, score higher on the postoperative satisfaction scale. It can help the surgeon to increase patient satisfaction postoperatively.

Comparison of 1 Year Nasal Tip Projection Results of Triple Cartilage Combining Suture (Flexible Tongue-in-Groove) and Classical Tongue-in-Groove Techniques.

Objectives: In the present study, we compared patient satisfaction with classical tongue-in-groove (TIG) technique and triple cartilage combining suture (TCCS; flexible tongue-in-groove) techniques applied to the nasal tip in rhinoplasty. Methods: In this retrospective study, 80 patients who underwent rhinoplasty operations with TIG or TCCS techniques applied to the tip region were included. There were 40 patients in both groups. All patients in groups 1 and 2 were evaluated by the criteria written below at preoperative, postoperative first month, and postoperative first year: (1) Rhinoplasty Outcomes Evaluation Questionnaire (ROE), (2) tip projection (cm), (3) nasal dorsum length (cm), (4) tip projection ratio (Goode), (5) nasofrontal angle, and (6) nasolabial angle. Results: The patients were followed up at 84.32 ± 19.38 months in the TIG group and 87.47 ± 18.01 months in the TCCS group. Our results showed that preoperative, postoperative first-month, and first-year tip projection (P = .013, P = .022, and P = .020, respectively), and nasal dorsum length values (P = .009, P = .020, and P = .020, respectively) of the TCCS group were significantly lower than those in the TIG group. There was a positive correlation between the postoperative first month and postoperative first year ROE scores. Lower preoperative tip projection ratio (Goode) values and higher nasolabial angle values were related to higher ROE scores showing patient satisfaction. Conclusion: For the patient satisfaction after tip rhinoplasty, lower projection ratio (Goode) and higher nasolabial angle values were related to ROE scores. Although there are no significant results, lower tip projection results in the TCCS group may be related to more patient satisfaction due to natural appearance.

Nasal axis lateralization suture technique in crooked nose.

The aim of the present study was to objectively and subjectively compare the preoperative and postoperative aesthetic and functional outcomes of the correction of crooked noses using a suture technique we call "nasal axis lateralization suture (NALS)". A total of 36 patients who had preoperative and postoperative photographs taken and who completed the Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation (ROE) questionnaire were included in the study. Crooked noses were divided into two groups: C-shaped (17 patients) and I-shaped (19 patients). The preoperative and postoperative nasal axis angles were 145.3 ± 11.9 and 178.5 ± 3.3, respectively, in C-shaped nasal deviation. In I-shaped nasal deviation, on the other hand, the preoperative nasal axis angle was 8.8 ± 2.8, while the postoperative nasal axis angle was 1.4 ± 2.4. In terms of the ideal axis percentage before and after surgery, a significant difference was found between the C-shaped and I-shaped nasal deviation patient groups (p < 0.05). While there was a significant improvement in both groups in the evaluation based on the ROE questionnaire, satisfaction was much higher in the C-shaped nasal deviation group. In both groups, the ROE values of functional and aesthetic outcomes were significantly different compared to the preoperative values of both groups (p < 0.005). NALS can be used as an alternative technique to correct both I-shaped and C-shaped nasal axis deviations.

Comparison of Aesthetic and Functional Rhinoplasty Outcomes Between Patients with Body Dysmorphic Disorder and Normal Individuals.

Rhinoplasty is among the top five most popular cosmetic surgical procedures worldwide. Among rhinoplasty candidates, the most common mental health disorder is body dysmorphic disorder. (BDD). The present study aimed to assess the prevalence of BDD among rhinoplasty candidates, its association with the patient's self-assessment of aesthetic outcome and nasal functional, post-rhinoplasty compared to applicants with negative screening for BDD. The following study is a cross-sectional, comparative study. Out of the 209 rhinoplasty candidates screened by the BDDQ questionnaire, 39 were positive for BDD. From the remaining 170 patients who screened negative for BDD, 39 participants were randomly selected as the control group for the comparative analysis. Rhinoplasty outcome evaluation (ROE) and standardized cosmesis and health nasal outcomes survey-cosmetic (SCHNOS-C) questionnaires were used for assessment of patient satisfaction with the cosmetic outcome of rhinoplasty. Nasal obstruction symptom evaluation (NOSE) and standardized cosmesis and health nasal outcomes survey-obstruction (SCHNOS-O) were used for the assessment of satisfaction with functional outcomes between groups of patients screened positive and negative for BDD. The prevalence of BDD was 18.66% among rhinoplasty candidates. The average age of patients screened positive for BDD was 31.41. The mean ROE score was significantly lower (i.e. lower satisfaction) in patients screened positive for BDD (15.69 versus 19.08, P = 0.001), regardless of confounding variables, such as age, sex, and marital status. SCHNOS-C score was higher (i.e. less satisfaction) among patients with BDD (47.01 versus 34.96, P = 0.021) and was significantly associated with higher odds of severe aesthetic concern post-rhinoplasty (OR (95%CI) = 5.000 (1.135-22.022), P = 0.033). Patients screened positive for BDD had significantly higher NOSE scores (i.e. less satisfaction with functional outcome) compared to participants negative for BDD (49.74 versus 37.82, P = 0.012). SCHNOS-O score had no significant association with BDD (P = 0.053). Furthermore, there was no significant association between BDD and NOSE or SCHNOS-O score after adjustment for the confounders. Patients screened positive for BDD were significantly less satisfied with the cosmetic outcome of the rhinoplasty compared to those screened negative for BDD. Assessment of BDD among rhinoplasty candidates before surgery, could potentially be beneficial for both patients and surgeons. This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Does being a healthcare professional affect satisfaction after septorhinoplasty?

This study aims to determine the differences in satisfaction levels after septorhinoplasty between patients who are healthcare workers and those who are not. The study includes patients who underwent primary septorhinoplasty surgery, divided into two groups: healthcare workers and non-healthcare workers. The Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation (ROE) questionnaire was administered to the patients at the 6th postoperative month. Among the 37 patients, 18 were healthcare workers, and 19 were non-healthcare workers. The mean Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation score for healthcare workers at the 6th postoperative month was 75.69 ± 16.06, while in the non-healthcare worker group, the ROE scores were 60.31 ± 27.69. The findings from our study indicated that individuals in the healthcare profession exhibited significantly greater satisfaction rates following septorhinoplasty in comparison to those in the non-healthcare worker group, with a statistically significant difference noted (p: 0.046). Having more knowledge about septorhinoplasty surgery and its complications among healthcare workers may allow for more realistic expectations regarding the surgical intervention. Simultaneously, it may facilitate better communication with the surgeon and the expression of expectations. Clinicians should pay attention not only to the patient's intellectual level but also to their health literacy in communication with the patient.

The comparison of 1-year results for mini and wide-size cap grafts applied to nasal tips.

In the present study, we evaluated patient satisfaction with cap grafts by Rhinoplasty Outcomes Evaluation (ROE) scores. Mini cap and wide cap grafts were applied. A total of 80 patients who underwent a rhinoplasty operation with cap graft application to the tip region were included in the study. According to the cap graft size, there were two groups: Group 1 consisted of 40 patients with cap graft size ≤7 cm (mini cap group). Group 2 comprised 40 patients with cap grafts ≥8 cm (wide cap group). Patients in groups 1 and 2 underwent evaluations based on the following criteria at preoperative, postoperative-1st month, and postoperative-1st year intervals: (1) Rhinoplasty Outcomes Evaluation Questionnaire (ROE), (2) tip projection (cm), (3) nasal dorsum length (cm), (4) tip projection ratio (Goode), (5) nasofrontal angle, and (6) nasolabial angle. Postoperative 1st-month and 1st-year ROE scores of the wide cap group were significantly higher than those in the mini cap group (p<0.05). Preoperative tip projection ratio (Goode) values of the wide cap group were considerably higher than those in the mini cap group (p<0.05). There were no significant differences between tip projection, nasal dorsum length, nasofrontal angle, and nasolabial angle values of the mini cap and wide cap groups (p>0.05). Correlation tests showed that as preoperative ROE scores decreased, postoperative-1st month and 1st-year ROE scores increased (p<0.05). Postoperative 1st-month and postoperative 1st-year's ROE scores increased together (p<0.05). In the wide cap group, postoperative 1st-month and postoperative 1st-year's ROE scores increased compared to the mini cap group (p<0.05). As postoperative 1st-year nasolabial angle values increased, postoperative 1st-year ROE scores also increased (p<0.05). We found that patients who received wide-cap rhinoplasty had increased postoperative ROE scores and higher satisfaction rates during the first month and first year. Postoperative higher nasolabial angle values were related to higher ROE scores and patient satisfaction in the postoperative 1st year.

Impact of Psychiatric Symptoms on Nasal Perception in Septorhinoplasty Patients.

Psychological assessment plays a crucial role in the preoperative phase of septorhinoplasty (SRPL), exerting potential influence on both pre- and postoperative aspects of quality of life (QoL). In this prospective study, SRPL patients were systematically screened using two validated questionnaires for body dysmorphic disorder (BDD) and one each for anxiety, depression, and somatic symptom disorder (SSD). Nasal perception was evaluated utilizing two disease-specific, self-report instruments: The Rhinoplasty Outcomes Evaluation (ROE) and the Functional Rhinoplasty Outcome Inventory-17 (FROI-17). A total of 95 patients were enrolled. Positive screening rates were 40.4 and 28.3% for BDD, 37.3% for elevated anxiety, 16.4% for depression, and 22.4% for SSD. Mean scores on the ROE and FROI indicated lower QoL in all positive screening groups. Statistically significant differences were observed for anxiety (FROI total score: 47.1 ± 14.6 to 37.8 ± 16.2; p = 0.021) and BDD (ROE: 43.7 ± 15.7 to 32.5 ± 15.5; p = 0.003 and FROI total score: 47.4 ± 15.3 to 37.8 ± 17.1; p = 0.014). The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale exhibited a significant correlation with the preoperative FROI score (r = 0.34, p = 0.005). Patients with positive screenings for depression, anxiety, BDD, and SSD demonstrated compromised QoL during preoperative assessments compared with their negative counterparts, reflecting diminished nasal perception in both esthetic and functional dimensions. Surgeons must be cognizant of these psychological aspects during preoperative evaluations.

Lollipop-Like Costal Cartilage Graft with a Peach-Shaped Head for East Asian Rhinoplasty.

Nasal tip refinement is a challenging step of East Asian rhinoplasty due to complex anatomical defects. Autologous costal cartilage grafts are commonly used to provide nasal tip support. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a modified technique using a lollipop-like cartilage graft with a peach-shaped head. A retrospective review was conducted on Chinese patients who underwent primary rhinoplasty with the modified technique between November 2018 and March 2021 at our center. Preoperative and postoperative facial photographs, patient-reported outcome measures including the visual analog scale (VAS) and the rhinoplasty outcome evaluation (ROE), as well as surgery-related complications, were collected for outcome assessment. A total of 31 adult patients were included in this retrospective cohort study, with a mean follow-up period of 17.12 ± 3.89 months. The majority of patients (28/31; 90.3%) expressed satisfaction with the aesthetic outcomes, as evidenced by a significant increase in mean VAS score from 3.97 ± 1.52 preoperatively to 7.39 ± 0.22 postoperatively (P < 0.01), and a significant increase in mean ROE score from 11.77 ± 2.33 to 17.22 ± 2.47 (P < 0.01). Photogrammetric analysis also demonstrated significant improvements in nasal anatomical measurements. Among the three patients with unsatisfactory feedback, two had mild columella deviations and one had a mild dorsum deviation. No other notable complications were reported. The current study supports the safety and utility of the modified technique utilizing the lollipop-like costal cartilage graft with a peach-shaped head for major tip refinement in East Asian patients. This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Evaluating the efficiency of endoscope-assisted septo-rhinoplasty via intranasal approach

Objective: To observe the functional and esthetic results of endoscope-assisted septo-rhinoplasty via intranasal approach. Methods: The clinical data of 12 patients with septal deviation and nasal deformity in the University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital from June 2021 to June 2022 were analyzed, including 8 males and 4 females, aging 28 to 58 years. All patients were operated under general anesthesia. The septal deviation was corrected by hemitransfixion incision, combined with intercartilaginous incision and other intranasal or extranasal incisions to perform osteotomy, hump resection and saddle nose correction. Patient satisfaction with postoperative functional and aesthetic improvements was assessed through Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE), Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation (ROE), and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).SPSS 25 software was used for statistical analysis. Results: The correction of nasal septum deviation was satisfactory in all 12 patients. Nasal obstruction was relieved, with NOSE score and VAS score of nasal ventilation decreased [(21.67±10.30) vs (70.83±14.12), (1.83±1.03) vs (8.33±0.89), t value was 9.49 and 16.30, respectively, both P<0.05]. The nasal appearance of 10 patients with crooked nose deformity was improved, with ROE score and VAS score of nasal appearance increased [(21.30±2.31) vs (8.10±3.31), (8.90±0.99) vs (3.80±1.62), t value was -11.85 and -9.33, respectively, both P<0.05];The nasal vestibule morphology of 2 patients with abnormal nasal vestibule was improved. During the follow-up of 12 to 24 months, no postoperative complication such as nasal septum perforation, nasal cavity adhesion or nasal dorsal collapse occurred in all patients. Conclusion: Endoscope-assisted septo-rhinoplasty via intranasal approach can resolve both functional and esthetic problems at the same time, improving outcomes while reducing surgical trauma.

Lateral Crural Turn-Up Flap for Increasing the Volume of Cartilaginous Nasal Sidewall in Closed-Approach Dorsal Preservation Rhinoplasty.

Dorsal preservation rhinoplasty can also be applied in crooked nose cases. This article describes a lower lateral cartilage-based flap (lateral crural turn-up flap) used to correct cartilaginous nasal sidewall asymmetries. It was aimed to introduce a flap to be used in crooked nose cases operated with dorsal preservation rhinoplasty and to show possible modifications of this flap. Eight patients who had lateral crural turn-up flap due to crooked nose between July and December 2021 were included in this retrospective study. Standardized preoperative and postoperative 12-month front-view photographs were analyzed and scored for correction of midvault nasal sidewall asymmetries by 2 plastic surgeons. The Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation (ROE) scale was applied at 12 months. The mean score given by the surgeons for correction of midvault nasal sidewall asymmetries was 4.18. The mean ROE score was 89, and all patients were satisfied according to their ROE scores. There were no major complications. Unilateral lateral crural turn-up flap seems to be effective in correcting cartilaginous nasal sidewall asymmetries in crooked nose cases operated with dorsal preservation rhinoplasty.

A New Classification of Pollybeak Deformity and Its Treatment in Asian Rhinoplasty.

Supratip deformity, also known as pollybeak deformity, is a common complication of primary and secondary rhinoplasty, characterized by fullness in the supratip region. The correction of pollybeak deformity is a challenging procedure, and its management requires a thorough understanding of the pathogenic mechanism of pollybeak deformity. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of surgical methods for correcting pollybeak deformity in Asian rhinoplasty. A retrospective chart review was conducted for 53 patients who underwent pollybeak correction between 2021 and 2022. A modified classification system for pollybeak deformity, the Supratip Fullness Rating Scale (SFRS), was developed to evaluate supratip fullness. The aesthetic outcomes of the patients were assessed by surgeons using the visual analog scale (VAS), and patient was self-assessed using the Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation (ROE) scale. The study demonstrated that our surgical method resulted in satisfactory outcomes, with a mean SFRS score change from 2.34[0.65] to 0.23[0.42], a decrease in VAS score from 7.47[1.73] to 1.79[1.67] and a high satisfaction rate of 77.36%, calculated by ROE score. No complications were reported. Our surgical method for correcting pollybeak deformity in Asian rhinoplasty can result in satisfactory outcomes, particularly in terms of aesthetic appearance, without any side effects. The use of the modified classification system (SFRS) can provide an objective evaluation of supratip fullness, thereby aiding in the management of this challenging complication. This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Efficiency of Middle Vault Reconstruction with Dorsal Septal T Flap in Achieving Ideal Dorsal Aesthetic Lines and Regularity.

Dorsal aesthetic lines and irregularities are the most critical points that can be manipulated in rhinoplasty operations. Although spreader grafts and flaps have been used for this purpose in the reconstruction of the keystone area for a long time, dorsal irregularity is often inevitable. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of dorsal septal T flap and nasal dorsum reconstruction in achieving ideal dorsal aesthetic lines and regularity. Thirty-four patients (30 women, 4 men) who underwent closed technique rhinoplasty between 2019 and 2021 were included in the study. The mean age of the patients was 25.4 years. Patients with crooked nose, severe deviation, and severe dorsal hump were also excluded. All patients included in the study underwent Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation (ROE) questionnaires preoperative and postoperative 1st year. The mean age of the patients was 25.4 years (range 18-40years). A total of 34 patients, including 30 women and four men, were operated. The mean follow-up period was 13.2 months, ranging from 12 to 14months. In the physical examinations performed at the control visits, no functional problem was encountered in any patients. Preoperative and postoperative mean ROE scores were 60.9 and 92.7, respectively. With the technique described in the study, dorsal hump recurrence is minimized compared to other preservation techniques. Since the keystone area transition can be fine-tuned, continuity is ensured, and ideal dorsal aesthetic lines are created. The stability of the upper lateral cartilages is provided, thus eliminating the need for spreader grafts. This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Ethnic rhinoplasty: Preliminary results of our technique in the pursuit of the harmonious nose

According to the American Society of Plastic Surgery, cosmetic surgery procedures for "ethnic patients" are annually increasing. Ethnic rhinoplasty traditionally represents a difficult challenge for plastic surgeons. Herein, we describe our personal technique to ethnic rhinoplasty to achieve a harmonious nose maintaining the characteristics of individual ethnicity and identity. In this study, we retrospectively reviewed ethnic patients treated with rhinoplasty at our institution between January 2019 and October 2022. We described our personal rhinoplasty technique step by step. At a minimum follow-up time of six months, postoperative pictures were taken, and patients were reassessed, evaluating aspects such as global symmetry and shape and contour of the nose. Finally, patient satisfaction was investigated according to rhinoplasty outcomes evaluation (ROE) questionnaire. A total of 1321 patients were included in the study. They reported a significant satisfactory aesthetic result in nasal image, as indicated by the mean postoperative ROE score (92.12). No cases of nasal contracture were recorded. None of the grafts was extruded or collapsed. Wounds healed without reported major infection. This study demonstrated that our approach is a safe procedure that contributes to improved functional outcomes with a high patient satisfaction rate and a low rate of postoperative complication. The creation of a solid base structure, nasal skin preparation, and an integrated patient approach are key elements of this surgery.

Quality of Life Improvement in Concurrent Septorhinoplasty and Endoscopic Sinus Surgery.

Septorhinoplasty (SRPL) and functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) are two frequently performed surgeries to improve quality of life (QoL) in patients with nasal symptoms. It has been demonstrated as a safe combination regarding complication rates, but patient satisfaction in concurrent surgery has not been adequately studied yet. Patients undergoing sole FESS due to chronic rhinosinusitis (n = 57), sole SRPL (n = 148), and concurrent surgery (n = 62) were prospectively evaluated for their disease-specific QoL before and one year after surgery. Each procedure was performed by the same surgeon (OCB). For SRPL, the patient-reported outcome measures Rhinoplasty Outcomes Evaluation (ROE) and Functional Rhinoplasty Outcome Inventory (FROI-17) were utilized, and for chronic rhinosinusitis, the Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22 (SNOT22). All three groups showed significant improvement in the postoperative QoL measurements (all p < 0.01). The postoperative improvements were slightly smaller in the concurrent surgery group compared with the single surgery groups measured with ROE (combined: +55.2 ± 9.3, single: +58.8 ± 9.8, p = 0.02), FROI total score (combined: +47.6 ± 5.2, single: +49 ± 5.4; p = 0.08) and SNOT22 (combined: +33.1 ± 6.7, single +34.5 ± 7, p = 0.26). SRPL, FESS, and combined surgery improve disease-specific QoL. When applicable, surgeons may offer the benefits of a combined procedure without compromising the QoL gain. 3 Laryngoscope, 134:1239-1245, 2024.

The Morphological and Functional Effects of the Endoscope-Assisted One-Stage Approach for Crooked Nose.

A crooked nose is an external nose deformity predominantly caused by congenital aplasia or acquired secondary to trauma or surgery, often accompanied by a deviated nasal septum. Patients with crooked nose have dual needs to improve both esthetic and functional problems. The clinical and photographic information of 48 patients diagnosed with a crooked nose and nasal septum deviation treated from January 2018 to January 2022 was acquired. The morphology and functional effects were investigated by evaluating the general condition of the operation, measuring the esthetic indexes of the nose, and subjectively scoring. For both morphology and function, endoscopy-assisted one-stage correction showed positive results in this study. The external nose deviation distance postoperatively measured 1.28 (0.85, 1.97) mm, which significantly decreased from the preoperative value of 3.96 (3.31, 5.29) mm. The scores of doctors and irrelevant medical students on nose morphology increased significantly from 4.75±1.88 and 3.84±0.76 to 6.48±1.21 and 7.21±0.67, respectively. The rhinoplasty outcome evaluation score and the "nasal obstruction symptom evaluation "score of patients were both significantly improved ( t = -7.508 and t =6.310, respectively, P < 0.001). Endoscope-assisted one-stage correction of the crooked nose can restore nasal morphology, improve the symptoms of nasal obstruction, and achieve patient satisfaction. It is a minimally invasive, safe, effective, and fast recovery approach for patients who need to solve both esthetic and functional problems.

Let-Down Rhinoplasty in Patients With Cleft Lip Nose.

Rhinoplasty in patients with cleft lip nose (CLN) deformity is challenging. Cleft lip nose deformity primarily affects the nasal tip, columella, nostrils, alar base, floor, and septum. The needs of patients with CLN are quite different from those of patients who undergo primary rhinoplasty. Recently, the dorsal preservation rhinoplasty technique has gained popularity. We applied this technique to patients with CLN deformity to obtain better aesthetic and functional results. Ten consecutive patients with indication for primary CLN reconstruction underwent let-down rhinoplasty. Rhinoplasties were performed using either the closed or open approach, with costal cartilage grafts and full-thickness skin grafts. A rhinoplasty outcome evaluation questionnaire was used to assess the results. Moreover, the use of the same questionnaire in prior patients allowed us to compare results between our previous and new techniques. The study included 6 female and 4 male patients, with ages ranging from 18 to 25 years. Only 1 patient had a history of bilateral cleft lip. Seven patients had a history of left-sided cleft lip, and 2 patients had right-sided cleft lip. Open-approach let-down rhinoplasty with costal cartilage grafts and full-thickness skin grafts was performed in 8 patients, whereas closed-approach let-down rhinoplasty with costal cartilage grafts was performed in 2 patients. Columellar struts and affected-side onlay costal cartilage grafts were used in all patients. All patients reported being satisfied with the let-down rhinoplasty outcome, and none complained of functional problems. However, nostril symmetry was not observed in some patients, particularly in patients who underwent closed-approach rhinoplasty. Combining open approach, full-thickness skin graft, costal cartilage graft, and let-down rhinoplasty shows promising and satisfactory outcomes in patients with CLN. However, further studies are required to confirm this observation.

The Use of Posterior Auricular Fascia Graft (PAFG) for Slight Dorsal Augmentation and Irregular Dorsum Coverage in Primary and Revision Rhinoplasty: A Prospective Study

IntroductionAugmentation and coverage of irregularities of the nasal dorsum remain a challenge in rhinoplasty. Different techniques have been described in the current literature for this purpose. The aim of this study is to assess and illustrate the author experience and outcomes using the posterior auricular fascia graft (PAFG) for dorsal camouflage and augmentation in primary and revision rhinoplasty.Material and MethodsA prospective bicentric study was conducted, including patients with slight dorsal deficiencies and/or with dorsal irregularities following hump resection, trauma or previous rhinoplasty receiving PAFG to improve the rhinoplasty outcome. To objectively assess the graft resorption rate, MRI was performed 2 weeks and 18 months after surgery. To investigate patient satisfaction, the preoperative and 1-year postoperative scores obtained using the rhinoplasty outcomes evaluation (ROE) scale were compared. The scores following a normal distribution obtained for each patient were compared using a paired t-test.ResultsForty-five patients were enroled in this study. Average follow-up duration was 35.4 months. Patients’ age ranged from 17 to 57 years. No cases of infection or major graft resorption were observed. No postoperative scars were visible at the donor site. All patients were satisfied after surgery, and a statistically significant difference between pre- and postoperative scores (p<0.0001) was observed.ConclusionThis study showed that PAFG is a reliable technique for dorsal camouflage and slight augmentation in primary and revision rhinoplasty. The procedure is safe, easy and quick and only requires a small learning curve.Level of Evidence IIThis journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.