Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality Of Life Questionnaire Research Articles

Two types of vidian neurectomy show efficacy in treating allergic rhinitis and vasomotor rhinitis

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacies of endoscopic vidian neurectomy (VN) and highly selective vidian neurectomy (HSVN) for the treatment of allergic rhinitis (AR) and vasomotor rhinitis (VMR). All AR and VMR patients were divided into two groups, Group VN and Group HSVN. The efficacy evaluation methods were visual analog scale (VAS), rhinoconjunctivitis quality of life questionnaire (RQLQ), and medication score. The efficacy evaluations were used to assess patient rhinitis symptoms, quality of life and drug usage. The time points of follow-up period were preoperative, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, and 3 years post operation. By analyzing pre- and postoperative VAS, medication score and RQLQ score, the results showed that rhinitis symptoms and quality of life in both VN and HSVN groups were significantly improved at 3 years, and the rate of improvement decreased gradually with time. Post operation, there were no significant differences in VAS and medication scores between the VN and HSVN groups. With respect to RQLQ, postoperative 2 years and 3 years improvements in sleep disorders, non-nasal symptoms and eye symptoms were significantly greater in the HSVN group than in the VN group. Improvements in rhinitis symptoms and quality of life in AR and VMR were sustained by VN and HSVN until 3 years post operation, with greater quality of life improvements in the HSVN group.

Efficacy and safety of azelastine hydrochloride and fluticasone propionate nasal spray in treating allergic rhinitis: a randomized controlled trial

Background: MP-AzeFlu (Dymista; Meda Pharma GmbH & Co., KG), a formulation combining azelastine hydrochloride and fluticasone propionate in a single spray, is superior to fluticasone propionate alone in relieving symptoms and improving the quality of life of patients with allergic rhinitis. Objectives: In this study, we evaluated whether the effect of AzeFlu, a generic drug manufactured from China, is equivalent to that of MP-AzeFlu. Methods: In total, 679 patients were recruited for a multicentre, randomized, double-blind, original drug-controlled, and parallel-group clinical trial. Overall, 339 and 340 patients were administered with AzeFlu and MP-AzeFlu, respectively. Efficacy was assessed by changes in the reflective total nasal symptom score, the area under the curve of reflective total nasal symptom score changes over time, changes from baseline in individual nasal symptom scores, and the Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire. In addition, a safety evaluation was simultaneously performed. Results: AzeFlu and MP-AzeFlu reduced the reflective total nasal symptom score from baseline (AzeFlu −6.7 [standard deviation, 2.59]; MP-AzeFlu −6.7 [standard deviation, 2.76]; P = 0.905) and improved nasal symptoms and quality of life (AzeFlu −62.3 [standard deviation, 33.59]; MP-AzeFlu −64.7 [standard deviation, 33.73]; P = 0.394) in patients with allergic rhinitis. Significant differences were not observed between groups. Conclusion: AzeFlu showed effects equivalent to those of MP-AzeFlu in this clinical trial and may benefit Chinese patients with allergic rhinitis. Registration number: CTR20190189 (chinadrugtrials.org.cn/index.html)

Direct Comparison of Quality of Life in Patients with Allergic Rhinitis Undergoing Sublingual Versus Subcutaneous Immunotherapy.

Background/Objectives: Subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) and sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) are commonly used for allergic rhinitis (AR), yet limited research has directly compared their effects on quality of life (QoL). We aimed to assess QoL differences between SLIT and SCIT recipients. As both forms of immunotherapy have reported benefits, we hypothesize that patients undergoing SLIT and SCIT will have comparable QoL improvements. Methods: A cohort study included patients with AR treated with immunotherapy from 2018 to 2022. Patients with obstructive sleep apnea, primary ciliary dyskinesia, cystic fibrosis, vasculitis, rheumatoid arthritis, sarcoidosis, or lupus were excluded. QoL was evaluated using the Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) at multiple time points. Demographics, additional therapies, and allergen sensitivities were recorded. Data were analyzed using SPSS Statistics. Results: A total of 41 participants were eligible for inclusion. Both SLIT and SCIT groups exhibited reductions from baseline RQLQ scores. Within SLIT recipients, 5/7 RQLQ domains significantly improved. SCIT recipients showed significant QoL enhancement in 3/7 domains. The mean difference between SLIT and SCIT cohorts was -0.18 (p = 0.57, d = -0.18, 95% CI [-0.79, 0.43] at a mean treatment time of 18 months. Conclusions: SLIT and SCIT showed comparable RQLQ score reductions after 18 months of therapy, suggesting similar QoL benefits between the two treatment paradigms. Further investigation is needed to explore SLIT vs. SCIT differences in long-term QoL improvements beyond two years.

Modified painless wheat-grain blistering moxibustion for allergic rhinitis of lung deficiency and cold attacking: a randomized controlled trial

To observe the clinical efficacy of modified painless wheat-grain blistering moxibustion for allergic rhinitis (AR) of lung deficiency and cold attacking, and to explore its effects on serum immunoglobulin E (IgE) and interleukin-10 (IL-10). Ninety-eight patients of perennial AR with lung deficiency and cold attacking were randomly divided into an observation group (49 cases, 2 dropped out) and a control group (49 cases, 2 dropped out). The control group received mometasone furoate nasal spray treatment. The observation group received modified painless wheat-grain blistering moxibustion at bilateral Feishu (BL 13), Gaohuang (BL 43), Zusanli (ST 36), and Shenzhu (GV 12) in addition to the control group's treatment. Moxibustion at Shenzhu (GV 12) was applied once every other day, 3 grains each time, forming moxibustion sores after about one week. After sores formed, moxibustion was applied once every other 2 days. For Feishu (BL 13), Gaohuang (BL 43), and Zusanli (ST 36), moxibustion was applied on one side first, every other day, 3 grains each time, until sores formed, then on the other side, alternating sides in a cycle. Both groups were treated for 4 weeks. The total nasal symptoms score (TNSS), nasal symptom visual analogue scale (VAS), and rhinoconjunctivitis quality of life questionnaire (RQLQ) scores were observed before and after treatment, and after 4 and 12 weeks of treatment completion (follow-ups). Serum IgE and IL-10 levels were measured before and after treatment, and treatment efficacy and recurrence rates at follow-ups were recorded. Compared before treatment, TNSS, VAS, and RQLQ scores in both groups were reduced after treatment and at follow-ups (P<0.05), and these scores in the observation group were lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). Except for TNSS scores in the control group at the follow-ups, and in the observation group at the 4-week follow-up, all scores at follow-ups in both groups were higher than those after treatment (P<0.05). Compared before treatment, serum IgE levels in both groups were decreased (P<0.05), and serum IL-10 levels were increased (P<0.05) after treatment. The observation group had lower serum IgE levels and higher IL-10 levels than the control group (P<0.05). The total effective rate in the observation group was 93.6% (44/47), higher than 74.5% (35/47) in the control group (P<0.05). The recurrence rates after 4 and 12 weeks of treatment completion in the observation group were lower than those in the control group (4.5% [2/44] vs 22.9% [8/35], 9.1% [4/44] vs 40.0% [14/35], P<0.05). On the basis of mometasone furoate nasal spray, modified painless wheat-grain blistering moxibustion could improve clinical symptoms in patients of AR with lung deficiency and cold attacking, and provide more sustained long-term efficacy, possibly through the regulation of serum IgE and IL-10 levels.

Intranasal Versus Oral Treatments for Allergic Rhinitis: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis

BackgroundTreatments for allergic rhinitis include intranasal or oral medications. ObjectiveTo perform a systematic review with meta-analysis comparing the effectiveness of intranasal corticosteroids or antihistamines versus oral antihistamines or leukotriene receptor antagonists in improving allergic rhinitis symptoms and quality of life. MethodsWe searched four bibliographic databases and three clinical trial datasets for randomised controlled trials (i) assessing patients ≥12 years old with seasonal or perennial allergic rhinitis, and (ii) comparing intranasal corticosteroids or antihistamines versus oral antihistamines or leukotriene receptor antagonists. We performed a meta-analysis of the Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS), Total Ocular Symptom Score (TOSS), Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ), development of adverse events, and withdrawals due to adverse events. Certainty of evidence was assessed using GRADE. ResultsWe included 35 studies, most of which assessed patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis and displayed an unclear risk of bias. Superiority of intranasal treatments was found for all assessed outcomes. Intranasal corticosteroids were more effective than oral antihistamines at improving the TNSS (MD=-0.86; 95%CI=-1.21;-0.51; I2=70%), TOSS (MD=-0.36; 95%CI=-0.56;-0.17; I2=0%) and RQLQ (MD=-0.88; 95%CI=-1.15;-0.61; I2=0%), being mostly associated with clinically meaningful improvements. Superiority of intranasal corticosteroids at improving the TNSS was also found against oral leukotriene receptor antagonists (MD=-1.05; 95%CI=-1.33;-0.77). Intranasal antihistamines were more effective than oral antihistamines at improving the TNSS (MD=-0.47; 95%CI=-0.81;-0.14; I2=0%) and RQLQ (MD=-0.31; 95%CI=-0.56;-0.06; I2=0%). ConclusionsRandomized controlled trials suggest that intranasal treatments are more effective than oral treatments at improving symptoms and quality of life in seasonal allergic rhinitis.

Effectiveness of ClariFix (Cryoablation) of the Posterior Nasal Nerve on Nasal Symptoms in Patients With Chronic Rhinitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background and Objectives: The present study evaluated the efficacy of cryoablation of the posterior nasal nerve in alleviating symptoms associated with chronic rhinitis.Methods: A systematic review of pertinent literature sourced from PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases was conducted through May 2024. The analysis focused on studies that appraised changes in quality of life and rhinitis-associated symptomatology before and after cryoablation treatment.Results: A total of seven studies (495 patients) were included in the analysis. Significant improvements in rhinitis-related symptoms were observed in patients undergoing cryoablation, irrespective of etiology (allergic or nonallergic rhinitis). Furthermore, cryoablation yielded improvements in disease-specific quality of life, as measured by the Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire. Notably, a clinically significant reduction (≥30% decrease from baseline) in total nasal symptomatology was noted in 71% of cases following cryoablation. Regarding the incidence of adverse effects, nasal dryness, epistaxis, ocular symptoms, and palatal numbness occurred in &lt;5% of patients, while postoperative pain occurred in 10% and headache in 20% of patients who underwent treatment. In subtype analysis, the total nasal symptom score in nonallergic rhinitis showed a significantly increasing pattern over time (p=0.0017).Conclusion: Cryoablation of the posterior nasal nerve appears to yield a decrease in subjective nasal symptom scores and an improvement in disease-specific quality of life. Notably, these effects persisted for up to 12 months post-treatment, with marked improvements observed in both allergic and nonallergic rhinitis subtypes.

Enhancing quality of life with 3-year course of sublingual immunotherapy for house dust mite-induced allergic rhinitis: An observational prospective study in real-life settings

PurposeThis prospective study aims to provide further supportive evidence by assessing the sustained effectiveness and safety of sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) using a vaccine containing house dust mite (HDM) extracts in patients diagnosed with allergic rhinitis (AR) with/without conjunctivitis (AR/C). Materials and methodsAR/C patients (n = 111, SLIT group: 57, control group: 54) allergic to HDM were treated with standardized SLIT drops or symptomatic drugs from October to December in 2020. The patients were directed by the investigators to attend annual hospital visits for the assessment of various parameters including the Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ), visual analog scale (VAS), total nasal symptom score (TNSS), total ocular symptom score (TOSS) and total medication score (TMS). During the study period, all participants were mandated to maintain comprehensive records of any adverse events (AEs) on diary cards, which were then communicated to the investigators via telephone. ResultsAt baseline (2020), TNSS, TOSS, TMS, VAS, and RQLQ scores were comparable between SLIT and control groups (P > 0.05). After one year of treatment (2021), significant reduction in all scores compared to the baseline for both groups (P < 0.001). At the end of the second year of treatment (2022), TNSS and RQLQ score in the SLIT group continued to decrease significantly compared to 2021 (P < 0.05). In the third year (2023), the control group showed a rebound in TNSS, TOSS, TMS, and RQLQ scores, significant differences compared to 2022 or 2021 (P < 0.05). Besides, the SLIT group had significantly lower scores across all domains of RQLQ compared to the control group (P < 0.001). Symptomatic treatment influenced the scores of Nasal Symptoms, Eye Symptoms, Practical Problems, and Emotions domains significantly in 2023 compared to 2021 or 2022 (P < 0.05). Within the SLIT group, no significant differences in TNSS, TMS, VAS, and RQLQ scores were observed between monosensitized and polysensitized patients throughout the three years of treatment (P > 0.05). All AEs were mild to moderate. ConclusionThe 3-year course of HDM-SLIT has shown significant therapeutic efficacy and a favorable safety profile in patients with AR/C. Importantly, our study presents initial evidence suggesting that the greater impact of AR/C on quality of life (QoL) may primarily stem from nasal symptoms, eye symptoms, practical issues, and emotional well-being.

Safety and efficacy of cryotherapy on chronic rhinitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Chronic rhinitis is when the nasal passages become inflamed and irritated, causing symptoms like nasal congestion, runny nose, sneezing, and postnasal drip that last for at least 12weeks. While various medical treatments are available for chronic rhinitis, studies have shown that patients often do not comply with the treatment or report that it is ineffective. Cryotherapy for the nasal mucosa is a surgical option that has shown promise for these patients, with acceptable side effects. Our goal is to evaluate the existing literature regarding the effectiveness and safety of cryotherapy as a treatment for chronic rhinitis. We searched four electronic databases for relevant studies. Data were extracted from the included studies after screening procedures. Using the random effect model, we calculated the pooled mean difference (MD) for our continuous outcomes and pooled proportions for categorical outcomes. The I2 test was used to detect heterogenicity. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were assessed for methodological quality using the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool 2, while observational studies and single-arm studies were assessed using the National Institutes of Health's tools. Our study comprised 21 studies; eighteen were eligible for analysis, with 1663 patients with chronic rhinitis. All of our assessed outcomes showed improvement with cryotherapy from their baseline status. Our pooled MDs for Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS), Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ), and Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scores were as follows: ( - 3.58, 95% CI [ - 3.80, - 3.37], p < 0.001), ( - 1.48, 95% CI [ - 1.68, - 1.27], p < 0.001), and ( - 26.65, 95% CI [ - 33.98, - 19.31], p < 0.001), respectively. Regarding nasal obstruction and rhinorrhea, cryotherapy showed effectiveness in 61% and 52% of patients in the complete relief subgroup and 26% and 34% in the < 50%-relief subgroup, respectively. We observed significant improvement in our measured outcomes as rTNSS, RQLQ, and NOSE scores compared to the baseline state, demonstrating the cryotherapy's efficacy. This improvement was consistent in all subsequent follow-up periods. However, we need more high-quality RCTs for stronger evidence to be generalized.

Clinical Effect Analysis of Fire-needle Acupuncture at Neiyingxiang Treating Persistent Allergic Rhinitis.

We conducted the first trial to evaluate the effect that fire-needle acupuncture at Neiyingxiang (ExHN 9) in patients with moderate to severe persistent AR. This was a randomized, single-center, sham, and placebo-controlled rial. Patients were kept blinded to their group assignment. All participants were equally assigned to the fire-needle acupuncture (FA) treatment group, sham fire-needle acupuncture (SFA) group, or loratadine group. The trial was designed with an acupuncture intervention once a week for 4 weeks and follow-up 4 weeks. The Total Nasal Symptom Scores (TNSS), Total Non-Nasal Symptom Scores (TNNSS), Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ), Allergic Rhinitis Control Test (ARCT), and total nasal resistance of 150 Pa were evaluated as outcome measures. A total of 180 participants were enrolled, and 175 participants completed the trials. At 2 and 4 weeks, the TNSS, TNNSS, and RQLQ scores of the FA and loratadine groups were significantly lower than those of the SFA group. At 8 weeks, the scores of loratadine group increased compared with the FA group (Cohen's d >0.80, p < 0.01). The ACRT score of the FA treatment group rose gradually. After treatment, the total nasal resistance of the FA group was significantly decreased and was lower than that of the other two groups (Cohen's d >0.80, p < 0.01). Fire-needle acupuncture at Neiyingxiang (ExHN 9) is effective for improving nasal allergy symptoms and quality of life in patients with moderate and severe persistent AR, and the duration of its effects is long. 2 Laryngoscope, 134:4471-4479, 2024.

Meta-analysis on clinical efficacy of ringheaded thumbtack needle in the treatment of allergic rhinitis.

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ringheaded thrumbtack needle in the treatment of allergic rhinitis (AR). Clinical studies about treatment of AR with ringheaded thrumbtack needle were searched from databases of CNKI, Wanfang, China Science and Technology Journal, China Biology Medicine disc, PubMed, Embase and Web of Science from their inception to November 2022. Two researchers independently screened the literature and collected related information. The total effective rate, visual analogue scale (VAS) for AR, rhinoconjunctivitis quality of life questionnaire (RQLQ), and recurrence rate were the main outcome indicators. Secondary outcome indicators included quantitative scores of symptoms and signs, 'quartering' symptom evaluation scale, etc. All the included studies were subjected to Meta-analysis using Stata software. A total of 22 clinical studies involving 1 491 participants were included. The results of Meta-analysis indicated that the total effective rate of ringheaded thrumbtack needle in the treatment of AR was higher than that of traditional Chinese and Western medicine ［RR=1.20, 95%CI (1.14, 1.26), P<0.001］, and recurrence rate is lower than conventional therapy ［OR=0.35, 95%CI (0.14, 0.89), P=0.027］. Moreover, The VAS score ［WMD=-1.30, 95%CI (-1.85, -0.75), P<0.001］ and RQLQ score ［WMD=-6.75, 95%CI (-12.74, -0.76), P=0.027］ of AR treated by ringheaded thrumbtack needle were lower than those of traditional Chinese and Western medicine. Ringheaded thrumbtack needle can improve the total effective rate, reduce the disease recurrence, and improve the symptoms of discomfort when AR outbreaks, and has no significant adverse reactions. However, the reliability is limited. Thus, it is still necessary to improve the level of evidence quality by including researches with large samples, rigorous design and international standards.

Intranasal antihistamines and corticosteroids in allergic rhinitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundThere is insufficient systematised evidence on the effectiveness of individual intranasal medications in allergic rhinitis (AR). ObjectiveTo perform a systematic review to compare the efficacy of individual intranasal corticosteroids and antihistamines against placebo in improving the nasal and ocular symptoms and the rhinoconjunctivitis-related quality-of-life of patients with perennial or seasonal AR. MethodsWe searched four electronic bibliographic databases and three clinical trials databases for randomised controlled trials (i) assessing adult patients with seasonal or perennial AR and (ii) comparing the use of intranasal corticosteroids or antihistamines versus placebo. Assessed outcomes included the Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS), the Total Ocular Symptom Score (TOSS) and the Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (RQLQ). We performed random-effects meta-analyses of mean differences for each medication and outcome. We assessed evidence certainty using the GRADE approach. ResultsWe included 151 primary studies, most of which assessed patients with seasonal AR and displayed unclear or high risk of bias. Both in perennial and seasonal AR, most assessed treatments were more effective than placebo. In seasonal AR, azelastine-fluticasone, fluticasone furoate and fluticasone propionate were the medications with the highest probability of resulting in moderate or large improvements in the TNSS and RQLQ. Azelastine-fluticasone displayed the highest probability of resulting in moderate or large improvements of TOSS. Overall, evidence certainty was considered “high” in 6/46 analyses, “moderate” in 23/46 analyses, and “low”/“very low” in 17/46 analyses. ConclusionMost intranasal medications are effective in improving rhinitis symptoms and quality-of-life. However, there are relevant differences in the associated evidence certainty.

Air pollution mixture associated with oxidative stress exacerbation and symptoms deterioration in allergic rhinitis patients: Evidence from a panel study

With allergic rhinitis (AR) on the rise globally, there has been a growing focus on the role of environmental pollutants in the onset of AR. However, the potential mechanisms by how and which these pollutants exacerbate AR conditions remain unknown. This panel study of 49 patients diagnosed with AR over one year aimed to assess the individual and combined effects of short-term exposure to multiple ambient pollutants on oxidative stress, symptoms, and quality of life among patients with AR. All participants underwent four repeated assessments of health conditions and personal environmental exposures (PM2.5, O3, SO2, and NO2) over warm and cold seasons during 2017–2018. We evaluated two oxidative stress biomarkers (malondialdehyde [MDA], and superoxide dismutase [SOD]) via nasal lavage. We collected information on self-reported symptoms and quality of life using the Rhinitis Symptom Scale (SRS), the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and the Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) through in-person interviews. Bayesian kernel machine regression (BKMR) was used to evaluate the joint effects of pollutant mixture and identify key contributors. The results revealed a significant association of the pollutant mixture when all four pollutants were at or above their median levels, with increased oxidative stress. This was evidenced by elevated MDA and reduced SOD. We found a joint detrimental effect of the pollutant mixture on AR symptoms with a strong association with increased SRS scores, but a non-significant positive association with VAS and RQLQ scores. PM2.5, O3, and SO2 presented as the potentially primary contributors to the adverse health effects associated with the pollutant mixture in Taiyuan city. Patients with AR exposed to short-term air pollutant mixture are more likely to have greater nasal symptoms and worse quality of life from increased oxidative stress and reduced antioxidant capacity. Further research is warranted to better elucidate the underlying mechanisms.

AM-301, a barrier-forming nasal spray, versus saline spray in seasonal allergic rhinitis: A randomized clinical trial.

Saline nasal sprays are frequently used in the management of seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) for the cleansing and clearing of aeroallergens from the nasal cavity. Also using a drug-free approach, AM-301 nasal spray is forming a thin film barrier on the nasal mucosa to prevent contact with allergens, trap them, and facilitate their discharge. A clinical trial compared the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of AM-301 and saline spray in SAR. A total of 100 patients were randomized 1:1 to self-administer AM-301 or saline 3 × daily for 2 weeks. Primary efficacy endpoint: reduction in mean daily reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS). Secondary efficacy endpoints: reduction in mean instantaneous TNSS and Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ), global impression of efficacy. Safety and tolerability: adverse events, relief medication use, symptom-free days, global impression of tolerability. AM-301-treated patients achieved a significantly lower rTNSS than the saline group (LS square means difference -1.1, 95% CI -1.959 to -0.241, p = .013) with improvement observed across all individual nasal symptoms. Likewise, all secondary endpoints showed statistical significance in favor of AM-301; for example, quality of life was significantly improved overall (p < .001) as well as for each individual RQLQ domain. Both treatments showed similarly good safety and tolerability. With AM-301, fewer patients used relief medication and more enjoyed symptom-free days compared to saline treatment. AM-301 was more effective than saline in improving SAR nasal symptoms and related quality of life while offering similar tolerability, demonstrating the benefits of a barrier approach.

The Efficacy of Elonide Nasal Corticosteroids in Managing Allergic Rhinitis: A Randomized, Double-Blinded Trial.

Background: Mometasone furoate nasal spray is efficacious in relieving allergic rhinitis symptoms. The objectives of this study were, firstly, to compare the efficacy of Elonide to Nasonex® and a placebo and secondly, to investigate the side effects of Elonide. Method: This was a prospective, single-centered, double blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled, non-inferiority trial. A total of 163 participants from the Otorhinolaryngology Clinic, Hospital Canselor Tuanku Muhriz (HCTM), were randomized into three treatment groups receiving Elonide (n = 56), Nasonex® (n = 54), and placebo (n = 53) nasal sprays using an online randomizer (Random.org). Treatment was administered for 4 weeks. The primary outcome measure was the Total Nasal Resistance (TNR), and the secondary outcomes were the Visual Analogue Score (VAS) and the Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQOLQ) score. Side effects were recorded. Results: There were significant improvements for all groups from baseline. The Elonide group had the greatest mean difference for all primary and secondary outcomes compared to Nasonex® and the placebo (0.77 ± 2.44 vs. 0.35 ± 1.16, p = 1.00 vs. 0.17 ± 0.82, p = 0.01). Elonide is non-inferior to Nasonex (p = 1.00) and superior to the placebo (p < 0.05). The highest side effects reported were for Nasonex (n = 14, 26%), followed by the placebo (n = 8, 16%) and Elonide (n = 6, 12%); headaches (n = 9, 17%) and sore throat (n = 9, 17%) were the most common. Conclusions: Elonide has similar efficacy to Nasonex® when compared to a placebo in the treatment of AR in adults. Elonide is safe and tolerable, with fewer side effects and no adverse side effects.

The Impact of Cytokines on Health-Related Quality of Life in Adolescents with Allergic Rhinitis.

Frequent episodes of nasal symptoms are the usual clinical manifestations (CM) of allergic rhinitis (AR) and have a significant negative impact on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in adolescents. The purpose of this cross-sectional study was to test the hypothesis that cytokines in nasal mucus may be associated with HRQoL in adolescents with AR. European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions 3 Level Version (EQ-5D-3L), "The Adolescent Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire" (AdolRQLQ) and the Total 4 Symptom Score (T4SS) scoring system were administered to 113 adolescents with AR, nonallergic rhinitis (NAR) and to healthy control subjects. Nasal secretions were sampled and tested for 13 cytokines using a multiplex flow cytometric bead assay. The AR group had significantly lower EQ-5D-3L (0.661 ± 0.267 vs. 0.943 ± 0.088; p < 0.001) and higher AdolRQLQ total scores (2.76 ± 1.01 vs. 1.02 ± 0.10; p < 0.001) compared to the control group. The AR group had higher concentrations of IL-1β (p = 0.002), IL-6 (p = 0.031), IL-8 (p < 0.001), IL17-A (p = 0.013) and IL-18 (p = 0.014) compared to the control group, and IL-1β, IL-6, IL17-A and IL-18 were significantly (p < 0.050) increased with disease progression. Cytokines IL-1β, IL-6, as well as severe CM, were identified as significant predictors of lower HRQoL in adolescents with AR. This study identified IL-1β, IL-6, as well as severe CM, as predictors of lower HRQoL in adolescents with AR. However, these results should only serve as a starting point for additional confirmation research.

Clinical efficacy of intranasal acupuncture combined with Tiaoshen acupuncture in the treatment of moderate-to-severe persistent allergic rhinitis

To observe the therapeutic effect of intranasal acupuncture combined with Tiaoshen (spirit-regulation) acupuncture for patients with moderate-to-severe persistent allergic rhinitis (AR), and to explore its mechanism of anti-inflammation. 135 patients with persistent AR were randomly divided into western medicine group, intranasal acupuncture group, and combination group, with 45 cases in each group. The western medicine group was treated with budesonide nasal spray, 1 press (32 μg/press) in each nostril, once a day. Patients in the intranasal acupuncture group were treated with intranasal acupuncture at the Neiyingxiang (EX-HN9) and Biqiu (nasal hillock) for 20 min. Patients in the combination group were treated with intranasal acupuncture combined with spirit-regulation acupuncture at Baihui (GV20), Sishencong (EX-HN1), Daling (PC7), Shenmen (HT7), Yintang (GV24+), Shenting (GV24), Anmian, and Yingxiang (LI20) for 20 min. Each group was treated once daily for 2 weeks. Total nasal symptom score (TNSS), total non-nasal symptom score (TNNSS), rhinoconjunctivitis quality of life questionnaire (RQLQ), self-assessment scale of anxiety (SAS), and self-assessment scale of depression (SDS) were observed before and after treatment respectively. Serum total immunoglobulin E (IgE), substance P (SP), neuropeptide Y (NPY), and vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) levels were detected before and after treatment using ELISA. The number of eosinophil (EOS) in peripheral venous blood was detected using a blood analyzer. The clincial efficacy of the 3 groups was evaluated. Compared with those before treatment, TNSS, TNNSS, RQLQ, SAS, SDS scores, EOS number and serum IgE, SP and VIP contents were decreased (P<0.05), and serum NPY content was increased (P<0.05) after treatment in the 3 groups. After treatment, the observation indexes in the intranasal acupuncture group were significantly improved (P<0.05) than those in the western medication group. The observation indexes of the combination group were better (P<0.05) than those of the other 2 groups. The total effective rate of the combination group (40/45, 88.89%) was higher (P<0.05) than that of the intranasal acupuncture group (35/45, 77.78%) and higher (P<0.05) than that of the western medication group (33/45, 73.33%). Intranasal acupuncture combined with spirit-regulation acupuncture can improve the nasal clinical symptoms and accompanying symptoms of AR patients, reduce EOS and IgE, as well as regulate the secretion of neuropeptide and relieve the negative emotions of anxiety and depression.

Quality of Life in Patients with Chronic Rhinitis after Radiofrequency Ablation of Inferior Turbinate

Background: Radiofrequency ablation of inferior turbinate (RFAIT) to treat chronic rhinitis (CR) is one of the most effective and safe surgical methods. However, there is no study on the quality of life (QOL) of patients with CR after radiofrequency. Therefore, the author conducted the present research. Objective: To study the QOL in patients with CR after treatment with RFAIT. Materials and Methods: The present study was a prospective study that enrolled 56 patients between August 2021 and December 2022. RFAIT was applied on both sides. The patients were given Rhinoconjunctivitis quality of life questionnaires (Rcq-36) and Subjective nasal symptoms questionnaires (Snsq) to compare the results before and twelve weeks after treatment. Results: The QOL after the twelfth weeks of treatment showed significant improvement in all dimensions (p&lt;0.001). Specifically, score for nasal congestion and runny nose decreased from 4.29±0.73 and 3.32±0.64 to 1.88±0.69 and 1.91±0.58, respectively (p&lt;0.001). There were no complications in all the patients. Conclusion: RFAIT can improve QOL and nasal symptoms of CR patients. RFAIT is an outpatient procedure with no complication, thus, it will be a good alternative treatment for CR. Keywords: Chronic rhinitis; Quality of life; Radiofrequency ablation of inferior turbinate

Long-term efficacy of house dust mite sublingual immunotherapy on clinical and pulmonary function in patients with asthma and allergic rhinitis

BackgroundA previous study reported that house dust mite (HDM) sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) for 48 weeks was effective as add on treatment for allergic asthma; however, data regarding its long-term efficacy is scarce. ObjectiveThis open-label extension study aimed to evaluate the effect of HDM SLIT on asthma control, pulmonary function, airway inflammation and remodeling throughout the 5-year treatment period. MethodsA total of 140 patients with asthma and allergic rhinitis sensitized to HDM were randomized to receive either drugs alone or drugs plus SLIT for 5 years. Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ)-5, Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ), Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ), spirometry, quantitative computed tomography, and type 2 biomarkers were assessed. ResultsAn improvement in the ACQ-5, AQLQ, and RQLQ scores was observed in the SLIT group compared with the control group. HDM SLIT increased lung function and reduced the percentage of airway wall area (WA/Ao). The levels of fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), blood eosinophil, serum specific IgE (s-IgE) for HDM, and total IgE decreased and were sustained during the 5 years. The change in type 2 biomarkers correlated with change in AQLQ score. Based on receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis for predicting responders, the area under the ROC curve in FEV1% predicted, WA/Ao, FeNO, and s-IgE was high. Multivariate regression analysis showed that the strongest predictor of responders was FeNO. ConclusionsHDM SLIT continued to provide sustained efficacy, improve lung function, and prevent progression of airway inflammation and remodeling in asthma through to year 5.

Эффективность и безопасность терапии мометазона фуроатом в сравнении с цетиризином у взрослых пациентов с сезонным аллергическим ринитом в условиях реальной клинической практики

Background: both H1-histamine blockers and intranasal corticosteroids are recommended as step 2 pharmacotherapy for allergic rhinitis (AR). Aim: to compare cetirizine and mometasone furoate (nasal spray) for AR treatment in patients requiring step 2 therapy in real-world clinical practice. Patients and Methods: this study enrolled 160 patients aged 18–75 years suffering from AR with pollen sensitization and requiring step 2 of therapy. The study was observational, open-label, comparative, and non-interventional. The patients were divided into two groups: main group (MG; n=80) who received over-the-counter medicine mometasone furoate (nasal spray) 200 μg/day regimen and comparison group (CG; n=80) who received cetirizine 10 mg/day orally for 1 month±2 days. Patients had three office visits. Each visit included a physical examination, anterior rhinoscopy, and self-assessment using the visual analog scale (VAS). Both patients and physicians completed the Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ). Results: treatment efficacy was excellent (0-1 VAS score) in 52 (65%) patients in the CG and in 76 patients in the MG (95%, p&lt;0.05). Treatment efficacy was good (2-5 VAS scores) in 12 (15%) patients in the CG and in 4 (5%) patients in the MG. The study found that 5% of patients in the CG reported satisfactory results compared to 0% in the MG. Additionally, a significant difference (p&lt;0.001) in the reduction of the RQLQ score was reported among patients who experienced an improvement in quality of life by day 14 of treatment in the CG (-80.3±19.3) and MG (-113.3±34.7). The effectiveness of mometasone furoate (200 μg/day) as a monotherapy for 4 weeks was found to be superior to cetirizine treatment (10mg/day). Additionally, it was associated with a greater improvement in quality of life and better treatment tolerability due to fewer adverse events. Conclusions: mometasone furoate (nasal spray) can be recommended as a monotherapy for adults with mild to moderate AR. KEYWORDS: seasonal allergic rhinitis, mometasone furoate, cetirizine, intranasal corticosteroids, oral antihistamines. FOR CITATION: Churyukina E.V., Gamova I.V. Efficacy and safety of mometasone furoate therapy versus cetirizine in adults with seasonal allergic rhinitis in a real-world clinical setting. Russian Medical Inquiry. 2024;8(3):132–142 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.32364/2587- 6821-2024-8-3-3.

Allergen Immunotherapy for a Year Can Effectively Reduce the Risk of Postoperative Recurrence of Adenoid Hypertrophy in Children with Concurrent Allergic Rhinitis (IMPROVEII).

Adenoid hypertrophy (AH) and allergic rhinitis (AR) are common pediatric diseases, seriously affecting the quality of life and growth of children. The recurrence rate of AH is higher for patients with than for those without concurrent AR. Allergen specific immunotherapy (AIT) is the only effective therapy for modifying the course of allergic diseases. This study sought to investigate the efficacy of AIT in preventing AH recurrence in patients with AR who underwent adenoidectomy. This study included 134 children aged 5-12 years with concurrent AH and AR. They were separated into the subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) group treated with a double-mite allergen preparation or the non-AIT group treated symptomatically with only medications. The adenoid/nasopharyngeal ratio at one year after adenoidectomy was used to assess AH recurrence. The Obstructive Sleep Apnoea Questionnaire (OSA-18), Paediatric Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (PRQLQ), and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) were used to assess the severity of the sleep disorders and AR. This study included 62 and 72 children with concurrent AH and AR in the SCIT and non-AIT groups, respectively. The rate of recurrence in the SCIT group was significantly lower than that in the non-AIT group (4.84% vs.16.67%; P=0.030). The OSA-18, PRQLQ, and VAS scores were significantly lower for the SCIT than (P<0.001) for the non-AIT group after one year of treatment. The findings suggest that AIT should be considered the preferred therapy for reducing postoperative recurrence of AH in children with concurrent AR following adenoidectomy, but further research is needed to confirm these findings in a larger population.