Due to low cost and low complexity, passive ultrahigh-frequency radio-frequency identification (UHF RFID) is gaining popularity in indoor localization. According to current RFID channel models, multipath propagation and noise are two significant factors that affect the accuracy of measured RF signals. To minimize the impacts of measurement errors on localization, scene analysis algorithms are proposed and got lots of attention in recent years. These algorithms make use of reference tags as similarity markers in neighboring locations to improve localization accuracy. However, densely deployed tags induce a new challenge, antenna interference, leading to the poor signal similarity between nearby tags. Nonetheless, there are no refined channel models for explaining the effect of spacing distances between tags on RF signal fluctuations, thus the choice of spacing distances becomes an outstanding issue for scene analysis localization algorithms. In this article, we propose Timing, the Tag Interference ModelING, for analyzing the relationship between signal fluctuations and spacing distances. Unlike inductive coupling in the near field, as the tags are all located at the far field of interacted antenna, we introduce microwave transmission line theory for channel model analysis. The experimental results verify that Timing is well suited to authentic situations. Additionally, we examine the performance of the <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">${k}$ </tex-math></inline-formula> -nearest neighbor ( <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">${k}$ </tex-math></inline-formula> -NN) algorithm under various spacing distances. The findings demonstrate that the spacing distance identified by Timing as a stable point achieves better accuracy with scene analysis algorithms. Therefore, Timing could be used as a critical foundation for the choice of spacing distances in future tag deployment applications.
Read full abstract