Revision Ulnar Collateral Ligament Research Articles

Performance-Based Outcomes after Revision Ulnar Collateral Ligament Surgery in Professional Pitchers.

To compare performance in baseball pitchers before and after revision ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) surgery using performance metrics. Case series. Public online database. Players who underwent revision UCL surgery between 2015 and 2021 were identified. Players were included if they were Minor League (MiLB) or Major League (Major League baseball [MLB]) pitchers. Players were excluded if they were not pitchers, if they underwent their revision surgery as an amateur, or if there is no record of their primary reconstruction surgery. Revision UCL surgery (repair or reconstruction). Return to sport (RTS) rate, RTS time, pitch velocity, and pitch spin rate. Sixty-five pitchers underwent revision UCL surgery. MiLB pitchers had a shorter RTS time after their primary surgery (15.62 vs 20.77 months, P < 0.01) compared with MLB pitchers but similar RTS times after their revision reconstruction (19.64 vs 18.48 months, P = 0.44). There was also no difference in return to play (RTP) rate overall after primary versus revision reconstruction ( P = 1.00). Major League baseball pitchers also had decreased RTS time after primary compared with revision reconstruction (15.62 vs 19.64 months, P < 0.01) but similar RTP rates ( P = 0.28). Finally, MLB pitchers had similar pitch breakdowns, velocities, and spin rates before and after their primary and revision repair or reconstruction. Both revision UCL repair and reconstruction can return pitchers to preinjury performance levels. Pitchers and teams should be properly counseled on realistic RTP times and postsurgery performance when discussing revision UCL surgeries.

Revision ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction in Major League Baseball pitchers: effects of fastball velocity and usage.

Ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) tears are prevalent in Major League Baseball (MLB) pitchers and can cause significant loss of time with varying reports of impact on performance. Revision UCL reconstruction (UCLR) is becoming increasingly common, with little known about the effects on fastball (FB) velocity and usage (FB%) in this setting. The purpose was to evaluate the effect of revision UCLR on MLB pitchers with respect to postoperative FB velocity and FB% at 1 and 2 years after return to play. The hypothesis was postoperative FB velocity and FB% would significantly decrease vs. prerevision levels, and that revision UCLRs would result in significantly decreased FB velocity and FB% in comparison to a matched group of MLB pitchers after primary UCLR. Twenty-one pitchers who underwent revision UCLR and returned to MLB play were identified from public records from 2008-2021. The PITCHf(x) system collected FB velocity for 4-seam (4FB) and 2-seam (2FB) fastballs and total FB% for pitchers in the prerevision year as well as the 2 years after return. A matched control group of pitchers who underwent primary UCLR was used for comparison. There were no significant differences in FB velocity between prerevision levels (4FB 92.9 mph, 2FB 91.4 mph) and years 1 (4FB 92.5 mph, 2FB 91.2 mph) and 2 (4FB 93.4 mph, 2FB 91.1 mph) after revision UCLR. FB% decreased from the prerevision season (60.1) and the first (56.2, P=.036) and second years (52.5, P=.002) after return. There were no significant differences between FB velocity and FB% or between the revision and primary UCLR groups. Pitchers returning to the MLB level after revision UCLR can expect similar FB velocity to their prerevision FB velocity and to pitchers undergoing primary UCLR; however, they do demonstrate a decrease in FB%, which may suggest less confidence in their FB after RTP.

Paper 12: Revision Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction in Major League Baseball Pitchers: Effect on Fastball Velocity and Usage

Objectives:Ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) tears are prevalent in Major League Baseball (MLB) pitchers and cause significant loss of time with varying reports of impact on performance. Revision UCL reconstruction (UCLR) is increasingly common, with little known about the effects on both fastball (FB) velocity and usage (%) in this setting. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of revision UCLR on MLB pitchers with respect to post-operative FB % and velocity at one and two years after return-to-play. The hypothesis was that post-operative FB usage (FB%) and velocity would significantly decrease versus pre-injury levels in the revision UCLR group, and that revision UCLRs would result in significantly decreased FB % and velocity in comparison to a matched group of MLB pitchers after primary UCLRs.Methods:Public records were used to identify MLB pitchers from 2008 to 2020 who underwent a revision UCLR. The PITCHf/x system, which was installed in 2007 and is a standardized recording of all pitches thrown in MLB stadiums, collected FB velocity for four-seam (4FB) and two-seam (2FB) fastballs and total FB % for pitchers in the pre-injury year as well as the first two years after return. A matched control group of pitchers who underwent primary UCLR was used for comparison.Results:Nineteen pitchers fit the study criteria. There were no significant differences in the revision UCLR group in FB velocity between pre-injury levels (4FB 92.87 mph, 2FB 91.43 mph) and years one (4FB 92.55 mph, p=.375) (2FB 91.2 mph, p=0.448) and two (4FB 93.38 mph, p=.695) (2FB 91.59 mph, p=0.806) after return (Table 1). There were also no significant differences in FB % usage between the pre-injury season (60.4) and first (56.5, p=.095) or second years (52.5, p=.053) after return (Table 1). In terms of walks and hits per innings pitched (WHIP), strikeouts per 9 innings (K/9), and walks per 9 innings (BB/9), the only significant difference between pre-injury and post-injury outcomes was a significant higher K/9 in the first season after return (p=0.031) (Table 1).There were no significant differences between FB velocity or % usage between the revision and primary UCLR groups at any time point (Tables 2-4). There were also no significant differences in the revision and primary UCLR groups between WHIP, K/9, or BB/9 with the exception of lower WHIP (p=0.015) and K/9 (p=0.001) in the pre-injury season (Tables 2-4).Conclusions:In pitchers that return to the MLB level, there were no significant differences in FB velocity versus their pre-injury levels or in comparison to pitchers after primary UCLR. While not statistically significant, a trend was demonstrated that there was a clinically relevant decrease in FB % usage, potentially suggesting less confidence in their FB.Table 1.Comparison of major league baseball (MLB) revision ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction (UCLR) between pre-injury and post-operative performance. The pre-injury performance was collected for the year prior to injury while the post-operative performance was collected for the first and second years after return-to-play. Statistical comparisons were made between pre-injury performance versus the performance at 1 and 2 years after return to the MLB. Fastball (FB) velocity reported as a mean in miles-per-hour (mph). WHIP- walks and hits per inning pitched, BB/9-walks per 9 inning, K/9- strikeouts per 9 innings, *-statistically significantTable 2.Comparison of major league baseball (MLB) pitchers with revision ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction (UCLR) versus a group of primary UCLR (controls) in their pre-injury season prior to their respective surgical intervention. Fastball (FB) velocity reported as a mean in miles-per-hour (mph).. WHIP- walks and hits per inning pitched, BB/9-walks per 9 inning, K/9- strikeouts per 9 innings, *-statistically significantTable 3.Comparison of major league baseball (MLB) pitchers with revision ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction (UCLR) versus a group of primary UCLR (controls) in their first season after return to play. Fastball (FB) velocity reported as a mean in miles-per-hour (mph). WHIP- walks and hits per inning pitched, BB/9-walks per 9 inning, K/9- strikeouts per 9 innings, *-statistically significantTable 4.Comparison of major league baseball (MLB) pitchers with revision ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction (UCLR) versus a group of primary UCLR (controls) in their second season after return to play. Fastball (FB) velocity reported as a mean in miles-per-hour (mph). WHIP- walks and hits per inning pitched, BB/9-walks per 9 inning, K/9- strikeouts per 9 innings, *-statistically significant

Revision Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction in Professional Baseball: Current Trends, Surgical Techniques, and Outcomes.

Background:Ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) reconstruction of the elbow is commonly performed on professional baseball pitchers. Recent reports have suggested that revision rates are on the rise and may be higher than previously thought.Purpose:To provide a comprehensive report on current trends, surgical techniques, and outcomes of revision UCL reconstructions performed on professional baseball pitchers between 2010 and 2016.Study Design:Case series; Level of evidence, 4.Methods:The Major League Baseball Health and Injury Tracking System (HITS) was used to compile records of all revision UCL reconstructions performed on professional baseball pitchers between 2010 and 2016. Player data and outcomes were obtained from HITS, and surgical details were obtained from operative reports. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed on epidemiologic data. Outcomes (return to play [RTP] rates, RTP times, subsequent injuries, and subsequent surgeries) were compared across the most common surgical techniques (docking vs modified Jobe) and graft sources (palmaris longus autograft vs hamstring autograft).Results:A total of 69 professional baseball pitchers underwent revision UCL reconstruction from 2010 to 2016 at an average of 1424 days (47 months) after their primary surgery. A trend was seen toward increasing numbers of revision surgeries over time (R2 = 0.441; P = .104). The most commonly used tunnel configuration was the modified Jobe technique (n = 41; 59.4%), and the most commonly used graft was hamstring autograft (n = 34; 49.3%). A majority (76.6%) of pitchers achieved RTP, and 55.3% were able to return to the same level of play. Mean time to RTP was 436 days (14.5 months) for players with a palmaris longus autograft versus 540 days (18 months) for those with a hamstring autograft (P = .108). Further, the mean time to RTP was 423 days (14 months) for the docking technique versus 519 days (17 months) for the modified Jobe technique (P = .296). Similar rates of subsequent injuries and surgeries were noted between the 2 revision techniques and 2 most commonly used graft constructs.Conclusion:Revision UCL reconstruction showed relatively high RTP rates (77%), but only 55% of players returned to their same level of play. Mean time to RTP was shorter than that found in other, smaller investigations. Although general trends were seen toward decreased time to RTP for the docking technique and palmaris longus autograft, these differences did not reach statistical significance.

Revision Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction in Professional Baseball: Current Trends, Surgical Techniques, and Outcomes

Objectives: Ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) reconstruction of the elbow is a commonly performed surgery on professional baseball pitchers. Recent reports have suggested that revision rates are on the rise and may be higher than previously thought. The purpose of this study is to provide a comprehensive report on current trends, surgical techniques, and outcomes of revision UCL reconstructions performed on professional baseball pitchers between 2010 and 2016. Methods: The Major League Baseball (MLB) Health and Injury Tracking System (HITS) was used to compile records of all revision UCL reconstructions performed on professional baseball pitchers between 2010 and 2016. Player data and outcomes were obtained from HITS while surgical details were obtained from operative reports. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed on epidemiologic data. Outcomes (return to play rates, return to play times, subsequent injuries, and subsequent surgeries) were compared across the most common surgical techniques (Docking vs. Modified Jobe) and graft sources (palmaris longus autograft vs. hamstring autograft). Results: A total of 69 professional baseball pitchers underwent revision UCL reconstruction from 2010 to 2016 at an average of 1,424 days (47 months) after their primary surgery. There was a trend toward increasing numbers of revision surgeries over time (R2=0.441; p=0.104). The most commonly used tunnel configuration was the Modified Jobe technique (n=41, 59.4%) and the most common graft utilized was hamstring autograft (n=34, 49.3%). 76.6% of pitchers were able to return to play (RTP) and 55.3% were able to return to the same level of play. Mean time to RTP in players with a palmaris longus autograft was 436 days versus 540 days for hamstring autograft (p=0.108) and the mean time to RTP in players was 423 days for the Docking technique versus 519 days for the Modified Jobe technique (p=0.296). Similar rates of subsequent injuries and surgeries were noted between the two revision techniques and two most commonly used graft constructs. Conclusion: This report detailing revision UCL reconstruction amongst professional baseball pitchers showed a trend towards increasing numbers of revisions being performed, a finding consistent with other recent studies. The overall return to play percentage was higher than previously reported (76.6%); however, significantly fewer (55.3%) players returned to the same level of play. This work also demonstrated decreased return to play times (n=484 days, SD: 117.3) compared to other investigations. The Modified Jobe was the most commonly used surgical technique and the two most commonly used graft constructs were hamstring autograft and palmaris longus autograft. Although this analysis did not reveal any statistically significant comparative differences between surgical techniques or graft constructs, future studies involving head-to-head comparisons of these surgical variables, specific to revision UCL reconstruction, may be helpful in improving player outcomes and career performance.

Outcomes With a Focus on Return to Play for Revision Ulnar Collateral Ligament Surgery Among Elite-Level Baseball Players: A Systematic Review

Background: Ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) reconstruction is commonly performed among overhead throwing athletes. Previous studies demonstrated relatively high rates of return to sport after primary reconstruction. Outcomes after revision UCL reconstruction have not been widely studied. Purpose: To report the rate of return to sport after revision UCL reconstruction among elite-level baseball players. Study Design: Systematic review. Methods: A systematic review of the literature following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Meta-Analyses) guidelines was performed for high-level baseball players undergoing revision UCL reconstruction. Study bias was assessed with the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies scoring system. The primary outcome measure was whether the study participants were able to return to sport after revision UCL reconstruction. Secondary outcome measures included career length after revision and pitching performance statistics. Data were summarized with ranges, tables, and weighted averages. A subjective analysis was performed. Results: A total of 5 studies met inclusion criteria. The rate of return to sport at preinjury level was 62.8%. Among Major League Baseball pitchers, the rate of return to sport at the preinjury level was 68.8%. The rate of return to sport at the same level or lower (Major League Baseball, minor league, collegiate) was 78.1%. Time to return to sport ranged from 1.3 to 1.7 years. Mean earned run average after revision ranged from 4.87 to 5.04. Mean number of innings pitched per season after revision ranged from 36.95 to 50.5. Conclusion: This systematic review demonstrated a limited rate of return to preinjury level of sport among elite-level baseball players who underwent revision UCL reconstruction. Pitching durability and career longevity were inferior to results that were reported for players who underwent primary UCL reconstruction alone. This study suggests that outcomes after revision UCL reconstruction are not reliable and elite-level players should be counseled accordingly.

Medial Elbow Pain During the Return-to-Throwing Period After Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction in Pitchers.

Background:Ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction (UCLR) is common in the sport of baseball, particularly among pitchers. Postoperative return-to-sport protocols have many players beginning to throw at 4 to 5 months and returning to full competition between 12 and 16 months after surgery. Medial elbow pain during the return-to-throwing period often occurs and can be difficult to manage.Purpose:To evaluate the incidence of medial elbow pain and associations with outcomes and revision surgery during the return-to-throwing period after UCLR.Study Design:Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.Methods:Between the years of 2002 and 2014, all pitchers who underwent UCLR at a single institution were identified. Charts were reviewed for incidence of medial elbow pain during return to throwing, return to sport, and subsequent operative interventions, including revision ulnar collateral ligament surgery.Results:Of a total of 616 pitchers who underwent UCLR during the study period, 317 were included in this study. Medial elbow pain was experienced by 45.1% (143 of 317), with a mean time of complaint of 9.75 months after surgery. The groups with and without pain did not differ statistically with regard to age (pain, 20.6 years; no pain, 20.9 years) or level of competition. Of those who experienced medial elbow pain, 10.5% did not return to sport; 5.6% underwent revision UCLR; and 19.6% underwent other operative procedures at the elbow. Among those who did not experience medial elbow pain when returning to throw, 8.7% did not return to sport, with only 1.7% undergoing revision UCLR and 6.9% undergoing other operative elbow procedures.Conclusion:Of the pitchers evaluated in the study, approximately half reported pain during the return-to-throwing phase after UCLR. Those who experienced medial elbow pain had a higher rate of subsequent surgical intervention.

Revision Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction.

Ulnar collateral ligament injuries continue to occur despite efforts to educate pitchers, coaches, and families at the amateur and professional levels about pitch counts, mechanics, and injury prevention. Although the data on the incidence of ulnar collateral ligament reconstructions are inconclusive, an increase in these reconstructions may mean a corresponding increase in the number of reconstruction failures and revision reconstruction surgeries. Less is known about the outcomes of revision ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction; not unexpectedly, early results are not as promising as those observed with primary reconstruction. In response, interest in revision techniques, rehabilitation, and outcomes of revision ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction surgeries has grown.

Length of time between surgery and return to sport after ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction in Major League Baseball pitchers does not predict need for revision surgery

Pitchers who return to sport (RTS) sooner will have a higher risk of revision ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction (UCLR) than those who return later. All professional (major and minor league) baseball pitchers who underwent UCLR between 1974 and 2016 were identified. Date of the index UCLR was recorded. The date of the first game back at any professional level after surgery and the date the pitcher returned to the same level of play (if applicable) were recorded. Length of time between these dates was compared for pitchers who required a revision UCLR and those who did not. Overall, 569 pitchers (average age, 24.8 ± 4.1 years) underwent UCLR and had reliable game logs after surgery. No statistically significant difference existed in the length of time to RTS at any professional level or at the same professional level between those pitchers who did not require a revision UCLR and those who did (P = .442, P = .238). Pitchers who required revision UCLR returned to any level of play almost 2 months earlier (14.7 vs. 16.5 months) and returned to the same level of play >2 months earlier (15.2 vs. 17.7 months) than matched controls who did not require revision UCLR, although this was not statistically significant (P = .179, P = .204). No statistically significant difference existed in the length of time to RTS after UCLR in professional baseball players who required a revision UCLR and those who did not.

Outcomes in Revision Tommy John Surgery in Major League Baseball Pitchers

Background With the recent rise in the number of Tommy John surgeries, a proportionate rise in revisions is expected. However, much is unknown regarding the current revision rate of Tommy John surgery, return to play, and change in performance in Major League Baseball (MLB) pitchers. Methods Publicly available databases were used to obtain a list of all MLB pitchers who underwent primary and revision Tommy John surgery. Pitching performance preoperatively and postoperatively for pitchers who returned to 1 or more MLB games after revision surgery was compared with controls matched for age and position. Results Since 1999, 235 MLB pitchers have undergone Tommy John surgeries; 31 pitchers (13.2%) underwent revision surgery, and 37% underwent revision within 3 years of the index procedure. Twenty-six revisions had more than 2 years of follow-up; 17 pitchers (65.4%) returned to pitch at least 1 major league game, whereas only 11 (42.3%) returned to pitch 10 or more games. Of those who returned to MLB competition, the average length of recovery was 20.76 months. Compared with controls matched for age and position, MLB pitchers undergoing revision surgery had a statistically shorter career after revision surgery (4.9 vs 2.6 seasons, P = .002), pitched fewer innings, and had fewer total pitches per season. Conclusions The rate of revision Tommy John surgery is substantially higher than previously reported. For MLB pitchers, return to play after revision surgery is much lower than after primary reconstruction. The overall durability of MLB pitchers after revision ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction decreases significantly compared with controls matched for age and matched controls.

Outcomes in revision Tommy John surgery in Major League Baseball pitchers

With the recent rise in the number of Tommy John surgeries, a proportionate rise in revisions is expected. However, much is unknown regarding the current revision rate of Tommy John surgery, return to play, and change in performance in Major League Baseball (MLB) pitchers. Publicly available databases were used to obtain a list of all MLB pitchers who underwent primary and revision Tommy John surgery. Pitching performance preoperatively and postoperatively for pitchers who returned to 1 or more MLB games after revision surgery was compared with controls matched for age and position. Since 1999, 235 MLB pitchers have undergone Tommy John surgeries; 31 pitchers (13.2%) underwent revision surgery, and 37% underwent revision within 3 years of the index procedure. Twenty-six revisions had more than 2 years of follow-up; 17 pitchers (65.4%) returned to pitch at least 1 major league game, whereas only 11 (42.3%) returned to pitch 10 or more games. Of those who returned to MLB competition, the average length of recovery was 20.76 months. Compared with controls matched for age and position, MLB pitchers undergoing revision surgery had a statistically shorter career after revision surgery (4.9 vs 2.6 seasons, P = .002), pitched fewer innings, and had fewer total pitches per season. The rate of revision Tommy John surgery is substantially higher than previously reported. For MLB pitchers, return to play after revision surgery is much lower than after primary reconstruction. The overall durability of MLB pitchers after revision ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction decreases significantly compared with controls matched for age and matched controls.

Pitching Performance and Longevity After Revision Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction in Major League Baseball Pitchers

Background: Medial ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) reconstruction is a common procedure performed on professional pitchers in Major League Baseball (MLB). Although a great deal is known about primary reconstruction, much less is known about revision reconstruction. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to evaluate statistical performance, return to play, and career longevity in MLB pitchers after revision UCL surgery, with the hypothesis that pitching performance and career longevity will decline after revision surgery. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A total of 33 MLB pitchers who underwent revision UCL reconstruction surgery (UCL-R group) were identified and compared with 33 age- and position-matched controls (CTL group). Return to play, total years played, and statistical performance were evaluated and compared with controls. Results: After revision surgery, 65.5% of UCL-R pitchers returned to the MLB level. On average, the UCL-R pitchers played 0.8 years less in the majors (P < .01) than did the control pitchers. The UCL-R pitchers who returned to the MLB level had a similar earned run average (UCL-R: 4.88, CTL: 4.76, P = .82) and walks/hits per innings pitched (UCL-R: 1.58, CTL: 1.44, P = .22) compared with the control pitchers. There were significant declines, however, in terms of innings pitched (UCL-R: 36.95, CTL: 75.00, P < .01), walks per 9 innings (UCL-R: 4.75, CTL: 3.49, P < .01), and wins (UCL-R: 1.88, CTL: 4.10, P < .01) as well as nonsignificant declines in wins above replacement (UCL-R: 0.25, CTL: 0.62, P = .06) and runs above replacement (UCL-R: 3.26, CTL: 6.91, P = .07). Conclusion: MLB pitchers who undergo UCL-R have a low rate of return to MLB play and have shortened careers after return. Pitchers who returned to the MLB level maintained performance in several statistics such as earned run average and walks/hits per innings pitched; however, pitchers returned with a significantly decreased workload.

Functional Outcomes Following Revision Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction in Major League Baseball Pitchers

Recurrent elbow ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) tears in baseball pitchers following primary UCL reconstruction is a relatively uncommon injury. However, over the last decade, an increasing number of UCL reconstructions has been performed, particularly on younger athletes. It stands to reason that based on the increasing numbers of reconstructions in younger baseball players, more retears will occur as these patients continue to play baseball. There is a paucity of literature concerning outcomes of revision surgery in high-level throwing athletes. To date, only one study has attempted to define clinical success rates following revision UCL reconstruction in overhead athletes. In this study, we attempted to better define the rate of return to professional pitching utilizing a stricter set of criteria that is arguably more appropriate for defining successful outcomes. This study supports the concept of overuse as a risk for treatment failure, as starting pitchers appear to have a lower rate of successful return to pre-injury pitching workload when compared to relief pitchers.

Functional outcomes following revision ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction in Major League Baseball pitchers

There is a paucity of data regarding outcomes following revision ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) reconstruction in Major League Baseball (MLB) pitchers. A single case series comprised of 4 MLB pitchers has reviewed outcomes in this cohort and reported a 75% rate of return to pitching. We hypothesize that MLB pitchers demonstrate a low rate of return to their pre-injury pitch workload following revision surgery. Clinical outcomes were reviewed with an emphasis on return to pre-injury pitch workload. Utilizing MLB player performance statistics, the postoperative pitch workload (appearances for relief pitchers and games started/innings pitched for starting pitchers) was calculated to determine if players were able to resume pre-injury throwing activity. Position-specific analyses for pitchers (starter vs relief) were also performed utilizing objective pitching statistics. Overall, 78% (14/18) of pitchers were able to return to MLB play within 2 full seasons. Relief pitchers were able to resume 50% of their pre-injury pitch workload, while starting pitchers only reached 35% of their prior workload (P = .52). Relievers demonstrated better pitching statistics (ERA [earned run average], K/9 [strikeouts per 9 innings], and BB/9 [walks per 9 innings]) when compared to starters. Two starting pitchers were reassigned to relief roles by their teams, resulting in improvement in their postoperative pitch workload (mean 94%). The overall rate of return to pre-injury pitch workload following revision UCL reconstruction is low among professional pitchers. Starting pitchers may be at higher risk for treatment failure in the revision setting, given the increased demands of the position, and may benefit from reassignment to a relief role.

Functional Outcomes Following Revision Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction in Major League Baseball Pitchers

Functional Outcomes Following Revision Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction in Major League Baseball Pitchers

Revision Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction Using a Suspension Button Fixation Technique

Background Revision ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction remains a challenging problem. The objective of this study was to biomechanically evaluate an ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction technique using a suspension button fixation technique that can be used even in the case of ulnar cortical bone loss. Hypothesis An ulnar suspension fixation technique for ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction can restore elbow kinematics and demonstrate failure strength comparable to that of currently available techniques. Study Design Controlled laboratory study. Methods Nine pairs of cadaveric elbows were dissected free of soft tissue and potted. After simulating ulnar cortical bone loss, ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction was performed in 1 elbow of each pair using palmaris longus autograft and a 30-mm RetroButton suspended from the far (lateralmost) ulnar cortex. A docking technique was used for humeral fixation of the graft. Elbow valgus angle was quantified using a Microscribe 3DLX digitizer at multiple elbow flexion angles. Valgus angle was measured with the ulnar collateral ligament intact, transected, and reconstructed. In addition, load-to-failure testing was performed in 1 elbow of each pair. Results Release of the ulnar collateral ligament caused a significant increase in valgus angle at each flexion angle tested (P < .002). Reconstructed elbows demonstrated no significant differences in valgus angle from the intact elbow at all flexion angles tested. Load-to-failure tests showed that reconstructed elbows had an ultimate torque (10.3 ± 5.7 N·m) significantly less than intact elbows (26.4 ± 10.6 N·m) (P = .001). Conclusion Ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction using a suspension button fixation technique reliably restored elbow kinematics to the intact state. Load-to-failure testing demonstrated comparable fixation strength to several historic controls of primary reconstruction techniques despite the simulated ulnar cortical bone loss. Clinical Relevance Ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction using a suspension button fixation technique can be considered in the case of ulnar cortical bone loss in a primary or revision setting.

Clinical Outcomes of the DANE TJ Technique to Treat Ulnar Collateral Ligament Insufficiency of the Elbow

Background Many improvements in ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction have been made since Jobe et al first described the procedure. A novel elbow ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction technique that combines interference screw fixation on the ulna with docking of the graft on the humeral side (DANE TJ) has been reported. Hypothesis Outcomes of ulnar collateral ligament reconstructions performed with the DANE TJ technique are as good as other recently published results of ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction, particularly in cases of insufficient bone stock on the sublime tubercle and revision reconstructions. Study Design Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods During a 3-year period, 22 athletes were treated with surgical reconstruction of the ulnar collateral ligament using proximal docking and distal interference screw fixation of the ligament (DANE TJ technique). All patients had a history, physical examination findings, and magnetic resonance imaging results consistent with ulnar collateral ligament injury. Patients were evaluated at a mean of 36 months postoperatively. Outcomes were classified using a modified Conway Scale. Results At the most recent follow-up, 19 of 22 patients had excellent results. There were 2 fair results and 1 poor result. The poor result was in a revision case. The 2 other revision ulnar collateral ligament reconstructions had excellent outcomes. When used in 2 cases of sublime tubercle avulsions, the results were excellent. Postoperative complications occurred in 4 patients: 2 developed ulnar neuritis, and 2 required second surgeries for lysis of adhesions. Three of these 4 patients went on to have excellent outcomes. Conclusion Clinically, the initial results compare favorably with other published techniques of elbow ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction. These early data support the use of the DANE TJ technique for revision cases and cases of sublime tubercle insufficiency.