Revision Surgery For Pseudarthrosis Research Articles

Pseudarthrosis and Rod Fracture Rates After Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion at the Caudal Levels of Long Constructs for Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery

Interbody fusion at the caudal levels of long constructs for adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery is used to promote fusion and secure a solid foundation for maintenance of deformity correction. We sought to evaluate long-term pseudarthrosis, rod fracture, and revision rates for TLIF performed at the base of a long construct for ASD. We reviewed 316 patients who underwent TLIF as a component of ASD surgery for medical comorbidities, surgical characteristics, and rate of unplanned reoperation for pseudarthrosis or instrumentation failure at the TLIF level. Fusion grading was assessed after revision surgery for pseudarthrosis at the TLIF level. Rate of pseudarthrosis at the TLIF level was 9.8% (31/316), and rate of rod fractures was 7.9% (25/316). The rate of revision surgery at the TLIF level was 8.9% (28/316), and surgery was performed at a mean of 20.4 ± 16 months from the index procedure. Current smoking status (odds ratio 3.34, P= 0.037) was predictive of pseudarthrosis at the TLIF site. At a mean follow-up of 43 ± 12 months after revision surgery, all patients had achieved bony union at the TLIF site. At 3-year follow-up, the rate of pseudarthrosis after TLIF performed at the base of a long fusion for ASD was 9.8%, and the rate of revision surgery to address pseudarthrosis and/or rod fracture was 8.9%. All patients were successfully treated with revision interbody fusion or posterior augmentation of the fusion mass, without need for further revision procedures at the TLIF level.

The Approach to Pseudarthrosis After Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: Is a Multiple-Rod Construct Necessary?

Retrospective study. Our goal was to evaluate the rate of rod fracture and persistent pseudarthrosis in cohorts of patients treated with a dual rod or multiple-rod construct in revision surgery for pseudarthrosis. A dual rod construct was used in 23 patients, and a multiple rod construct in 24 patients, spanning the pseudarthrosis level. Two-year fusion grading, and rates of pseudarthrosis and implant failure, were assessed. There were no differences in patient or surgical characteristics between the groups: (2- rod construct: Age 60 ± 14, Levels 10 ± 5, 3-column osteotomy:17%; multiple-rod construct: Age: 62 ± 11, Levels 9 ± 4, 3-column osteotomy:30%). Patients in the multiple rod construct were transfused a greater volume of packed red blood cells (pRBCs) intraoperatively (2.6 ± 2.9 vs. 1.1 ± 1.5 U, p < 0.0001). At 2 year follow up there was no difference in fusion grades at the previous level of pseudarthrosis, the rate of rod fracture or pseudarthrosis between the 2 groups, or rate of reoperation for pseudarthrosis, rod fracture, wound infection, hardware prominence, or PJK/PJF. Our data demonstrate no difference in fusion grade, or rates of rod fracture and revision at 2 years, after utilizing a dual rod versus multiple rod construct in revision surgery for pseudarthrosis. The low complication rates seen with either configuration warrant further investigation of the optimal instrumentation configuration.

P88. Revision surgery for pseudarthrosis after surgical correction with pedicle subtraction osteotomy in adult spinal deformity: comparison of rod change only, anterior lumbar interbody fusion around pedicle subtraction osteotomy, and 4-rod constructs

BACKGROUND CONTEXT Pseudarthrosis is the most common cause of revision surgery after sagittal correction with long posterior spinal fusion (PSF) in patients with ASD. Although revision surgery for pseudarthrosis after surgical correction of adult spinal deformity (ASD) remains challenging and without consensus, previous studies did not sufficiently compare the methods of revision surgery. PURPOSE We aimed to determine the most useful of the following three methods of revision surgery: surgery for rod change only, anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) around pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO), and 4-rod constructs. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING Retrospective, consecutive case review. PATIENT SAMPLE A total of 79 patients (average age 70.5 years) who were diagnosed adult spinal deformity with sagittal imbalance and followed up for more than 5 years after surgical correction with pedicle subtraction osteotomy. OUTCOME MEASURES Description and analysis of X-ray changes. METHODS There were 42 revision surgeries for pseudarthrosis performed by one of three methods: rod change with 2-rod constructs (n=16), anterior lumbar interbody fusion around PSO with rod change (n=9), and rod change with 4-rod constructs (n=17). RESULTS Preoperative lumbar lordosis was corrected (69.4˚) from 3.6° to -65.8˚ while sagittal vertical axis (SVA) was corrected (185.7 mm) from 176.9 mm to -8.8 mm. Pseudarthrosis occurred (42/79, 53%) around PSO site on the average of 21 months after the surgery, so that revision surgery was performed. There were no statistically significant differences among the other risk factors except the surgical methods for the three groups. Re-pseudarthrosis occurred in 4 of 42 (9.5%) cases in patients who received rod change using the 2-rod constructs method around PSO site at 15, 18, 24 and 35 months postoperatively, and there was no re-pseudarthrosis in the other two groups (P=0.042). CONCLUSIONS Our study showed that anterior lumbar interbody fusion around PSO and 4-rod constructs are preferable to rod change with 2-rod constructs. Therefore, our research can provide an effective guideline for revision surgery for pseudarthrosis that occurs after long PSF with PSO. FDA DEVICE/DRUG STATUS This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.

Metabolic and Endocrine Disorders in Pseudarthrosis.

Retrospective Cohort. Establish 1-year patient-reported outcomes after spine surgery for symptomatic pseudarthrosis compared with other indications. In the subgroup of pseudarthrosis patients, describe preexisting metabolic and endocrine-related disorders, and identify any new diagnoses or treatments initiated by an endocrine specialist. Despite surgical advances in recent decades, pseudarthrosis remains among the most common complications and indications for revision after fusion spine surgery. A better understanding of the outcomes after revision surgery for pseudarthrosis and risk factors for pseudarthrosis are needed. Using data from our institutional spine registry, we retrospectively reviewed patients undergoing elective spine surgery between October 2010 and November 2016. Patients were stratified by surgical indication (pseudarthrosis vs. not pseudarthrosis), and 1-year outcomes for satisfaction, disability, quality of life, and pain were compared. In a descriptive subgroup analysis of pseudarthrosis patients, we identified preexisting endocrine-related disorders, frequency of endocrinology referral, and any new diagnoses and treatments initiated through the referral. Of 2721 patients included, 169 patients underwent surgery for pseudarthrosis. No significant difference was found in 1-year satisfaction between pseudarthrosis and nonpseudarthrosis groups (77.5% vs. 83.6%, respectively). A preexisting endocrine-related disorder was identified in 82% of pseudarthrosis patients. Endocrinology referral resulted in a new diagnosis or treatment modification in 58 of 59 patients referred. The most common diagnoses identified included osteoporosis, vitamin D deficiency, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, sex-hormone deficiency, and hypothyroidism. The most common treatments initiated through endocrinology were anabolic agents (teriparatide and abaloparatide), calcium, and vitamin D supplementation. Patients undergoing revision spine surgery for pseudarthrosis had similar 1-year satisfaction rates to other surgical indications. In conjunction with a bone metabolic specialist, our descriptive analysis of endocrine-related disorders among patients with a pseudarthrosis can guide protocols for workup, indications for endocrine referral, and guide prospective studies in this field.

Estimating a price point for cost-benefit of bone morphogenetic protein in pseudarthrosis prevention for adult spinal deformity surgery.

Bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) is associated with reduced rates of pseudarthrosis and has the potential to decrease the need for revision surgery. There are limited data evaluating the cost-benefit of BMP for pseudarthrosis-related prevention surgery in adult spinal deformity. The authors performed a single-center retrospective review of 200 consecutive patients with adult spinal deformity. Demographic data and costs of BMP, primary surgery, and revision surgery for pseudarthrosis were collected. Patients with less than 12 months of follow-up or with infection, tumor, or neuromuscular disease were excluded. One hundred fifty-one patients (107 [71%] women) with a mean age of 65 years met the inclusion criteria. The mean number of levels fused was 10; BMP was used in 98 cases (65%), and the mean follow-up was 23 months. Fifteen patients (10%) underwent surgical revision for pseudarthrosis; BMP use was associated with an 11% absolute risk reduction in the rate of reoperation (17% vs 6%, p = 0.033), with a number needed to treat of 9.2. There were no significant differences in age, sex, upper instrumented vertebra, or number of levels fused in patients who received BMP. In a multivariate model including age, sex, number of levels fused, and the upper instrumented vertebra, only BMP (OR 0.250, 95% CI 0.078-0.797; p = 0.019) was associated with revision surgery for pseudarthrosis. The mean direct cost of primary surgery was $87,653 ± $19,879, and the mean direct cost of BMP was $10,444 ± $4607. The mean direct cost of revision surgery was $52,153 ± $26,985. The authors independently varied the efficacy of BMP, cost of BMP, and cost of reoperation by ± 50%; only reductions in the cost of BMP resulted in a cost savings per 100 patients. Using these data, the authors estimated a price point of $5663 in order for BMP to be cost-neutral. Use of BMP was associated with a significant reduction in the rates of revision surgery for pseudarthrosis. At its current price, the direct in-hospital costs for BMP exceed the costs associated with revision surgery; however, this likely underestimates the true value of BMP when considering the savings associated with reductions in rehabilitation, therapy, medication, and additional outpatient costs.

Results of revision surgery after pedicle subtraction osteotomy for fixed sagittal imbalance with pseudarthrosis at the prior osteotomy site or elsewhere: minimum 5 years post-revision.

Retrospective review of pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) cases. To report our results, radiographic and clinical outcomes at a minimum 5 years following revision surgery for pseudarthrosis after a PSO. To our knowledge, there is no report on the results of revision surgery for pseudarthrosis after a PSO. Eighteen consecutive patients with pseudarthrosis after PSO (16 females/2 males; average age at surgery, 49.8 yr) treated with revision surgery at one institution were analyzed (average follow-up, 6.5 yr; range, 5-12 yr). Radiographic and clinical outcomes analysis was performed. Sagittal vertical axis (SVA) and lumbar lordosis (LL) improved significantly after revision surgery (SVA, P = 0.000; LL, P = 0.024) and were maintained until ultimate post-revision follow-up (SVA, P = 0.170; LL, P = 0.729). Proximal junctional angle (P = 0.828), thoracic kyphosis (P = 0.828), and PSO angle (P = 0.717) achieved by the primary surgery were also maintained until ultimate post-revision. We increased the number of rods and/or changed them to 6.35-mm diameter in all patients. There were significant improvements post-revision in Oswestry Disability Index (45 vs. 37.9, P = 0.041) and Scoliosis Research Society pain subscale (2.6 vs. 3.1, P = 0.047) but not in Scoliosis Research Society total score or other subscales. Pelvic incidence greater than 60° demonstrated a trend toward poorer Oswestry Disability Index and Scoliosis Research Society scores (P > 0.05), but there were no significant differences between SVA greater or less than 11 cm. Revision surgery for pseudarthrosis after PSO can provide acceptable radiographic and clinical outcomes at a minimum 5 years post-revision. Successful surgical outcomes may be achieved by using an increased number or size of implants and ample bone graft for complete fusion after revision surgery. 4.

Revision surgery for lumbar pseudarthrosis

Background contextRevision surgery for pseudarthrosis after a lumbar spinal fusion has unpredictable functional results. PurposeThe aim of this study was to determine the clinical outcomes of revision surgery to fuse the pseudarthrosis site based on the two most common diagnoses (degenerative disc disease [DDD] vs. spondylolisthesis). Study designPatients who had a revision surgery between 1995 and 2004 for lumbar pseudarthrosis after short segment lumbar spinal fusion were identified through the institution's Spine Center surgery database. A retrospective chart review of clinical, hospital, and anesthesia records was then performed. Patient sampleSixty-six patients were included in the study (28 patients with DDD and 38 patients with spondylolisthesis). Inclusion criteria were a surgical diagnosis of pseudarthrosis with a prior fusion of one or two motion segments, minimum 24 months of follow-up, and a diagnosis of either symptomatic DDD or spondylolisthesis as the primary indication for the index fusion surgery. Outcome measuresThe Oswestry disability index (ODI) and a self-assessment questionnaire were used to evaluate clinical outcomes. MethodsA retrospective chart and radiographic review was performed. Statistical analysis was done using Student t test for ODI scores and chi-square test for discrete variables from the outcome questionnaires. ResultsFollow-up radiographs were available for 64 patients (97%), and a fusion rate of 100% was found in both groups for the radiographs examined. The mean postoperative ODI score was 53.3 (30–84.4) for DDD patients and 37.2 (2.5–76) for the spondylolisthesis group (p<.01). Only 50% of the patients in the DDD group felt that their overall well-being had improved since the surgery. In the spondylolisthesis group, 64% of patients stated that their overall well-being had improved since their revision surgery. ConclusionsThe clinical outcomes after revision surgery for pseudarthrosis are worse in patients with DDD compared with spondylolisthesis despite successful repair of nonunion. Risks and benefits should be well discussed with the patients before deciding on surgical treatment for the management of pseudarthrosis, especially in patients with previous short-segment fusions done for DDD.

Spinal Fusion After Revision Surgery for Pseudarthrosis in Adult Scoliosis

A retrospective study. OBJECTIVE.: To decipher the incidence, characteristics, functional outcomes, and complications of spinal fusion after revision surgery for recurrent pseudarthrosis in adult patients with scoliosis. While the rate of spinal fusion has been examined in the past, there have been no studies that have examined the incidence, characteristics, functional outcomes, and complications of spinal fusion after pseudarthrosis repair in adult patients with scoliosis. A total of 132 patients with failed spinal fusion surgery for adult scoliosis and painful pseudarthroses were studied. Each patient had an average of 3.7 spinal surgeries before undergoing revision at our institution. In addition to clinical assessment and imaging studies, pseudarthrosis was confirmed intraoperatively in all patients. All patients underwent reinstrumentation and fusion along with adjunctive procedures as needed. Spinal fusion was assessed clinically and radiographically after surgery for a minimum of 40 months. Subjective functional outcomes and complications associated with the procedures were also studied. The overall incidence of spinal fusion after revision surgery for pseudarthrosis in adult scoliosis was 90%. There was a propensity for pseudarthrosis to recur at the thoracolumbar and lumbosacral junctions. Increasing thoracolumbar kyphosis and loss of sagittal balance were significant risk factors for recurrent pseudarthrosis after revision surgery (mean thoracolumbar kyphosis of 23 degrees and mean sagittal balance of 7.9 cm anteriorly associated with persistent pseudarthrosis). Additionally, patients with multiple preoperative sites of pseudarthroses were at a higher risk for continued pseudarthrosis after surgery. Cigarette smoking, age, and surgical approach did not have any significant correlation with pseudarthrosis. Seventy-two percent of patients were satisfied with the outcome and 80% would have chosen to undergo surgery again if necessary. Thirty-three percent of patients who underwent surgery had some complication related to the surgery. Revision surgery for pseudarthrosis repair in adult scoliosis is most successful at attaining fusion when thoracolumbar and overall sagittal alignment are restored as much as possible.

Treatment of thoracic pseudarthrosis in the adult: is combined surgery necessary?

In deformity surgery in adults, pseudarthrosis remains an important cause of progressive deformity and postoperative pain. Revision surgery for pseudarthrosis in the lumbar spine is a difficult challenge with failure rates of as much as 50% using posterior surgery alone. Treatment of pseudarthrosis of the thoracic spine has not been well-described. The purpose of the current study was to review the long-term clinical and radiographic results of posterior-only surgery for the treatment of pseudarthrosis in the thoracic spine. Using a posterior extension osteotomy through the identified pseudarthrosis with reinstrumentation and autogenous bone grafting, an improvement of regional sagittal balance was shown and reliable clinical outcomes were obtained. A single-stage posterior revision surgery with extension osteotomies through the regions of pseudarthrosis coupled with rigid internal fixation and autogenous bone grafting is an effective technique for treatment of pseudarthrosis of the thoracic spine. This technique improves regional sagittal deformity and leads to reliable arthrodesis. Combined anterior and posterior surgery was not necessary for effective treatment of thoracic pseudarthrosis in this series.