Revision For Aseptic Loosening Research Articles

Survivorship and Functional Outcomes After Complex Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty With Contemporary Rotating-Hinge Implants

Background: Initial fixed-bearing hinge designs for primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) had high rates of aseptic loosening. There are limited data on contemporary rotating-hinge implants. Purpose: We sought to determine survivorship and functional outcomes of contemporary rotating-hinge implants used in primary TKA. Methods: Retrospective review identified 54 primary rotating-hinge TKAs implanted in 49 patients from 2014 to 2018 at a single institution. Patients identified were 76% women, the mean body mass index was 29 kg/m2, the mean age was 65 years, and the mean follow-up was 3 years. The primary diagnosis for TKA in all cases was severe instability and ligamentous compromise. Secondary diagnoses included post-traumatic osteoarthritis (11, 20%), neurologic disease (10, 19%), inflammatory arthritis (10, 19%), connective tissue disease (3, 6%), valgus deformity (16, 30%), varus deformity (2, 4%), and recurvatum (2, 4%). Preoperative, postoperative (within 6 weeks), and most recent radiographs were reviewed. In this study, we collected preoperative, 1-year, and 2-year patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for patients with primary rotating-hinge TKA. Patient-reported outcome measures were prospectively collected, including the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Survey for Joint Replacement (KOOS JR) scores and the Mental (MCS) and Physical Component Scores (PCS) of the Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey (VR-12). Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to determine implant survivorship. Results: Reoperation was required in 6% (3/54); indications included periprosthetic joint infection (1), peripatellar fibrosis (1), and periprosthetic femur fracture (1). At both 2 and 5 years, survivorship free from all-cause reoperation was 95% and from revision for aseptic loosening was 100%. Mean KOOS JR scores increased from 47 preoperatively to 65 at 2 years postoperatively. On radiographic review, there were no progressive radiolucent lines consistent with aseptic loosening at final follow-up. Conclusion: The findings of this single-center, multi-surgeon retrospective case series on the use of rotating-hinge implants for primary TKA suggest excellent 2-year survivorship free from reoperation and no revisions for aseptic loosening. We report modest improvement in a variety of PROMs at 1-year and 2-year follow-up. Despite improvement, clinical outcomes were poor for a primary implant. Longer-term follow-up is required to monitor the durability of primary hinges.

Clinical outcomes of total joint arthroplasty in patients with bowel ostomies.

The influence of prior colostomy or ileostomy on patients undergoing joint arthroplasty remains poorly understood. Our study aimed to assess whether patients with an ostomy undergoing hip and knee arthroplasties have worse postoperative outcomes and increased rates of revisions. A single-center, retrospective review of patients with a history of bowel ostomy who underwent a primary total hip arthroplasty (THA), hemiarthroplasty (HA), and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) from 2012 to 2021. A total of 24 THAs, 11 HAs, and 25 TKAs in patients with open small or large bowel stoma were identified. A ten-to-one propensity score match was utilized to establish cohorts with comparable demographics but no prior ostomy procedure. Patients with stomas undergoing elective THA showed greater 90-day ED visits (20.0 vs. 5.0%, P = 0.009), 90-day all-cause readmissions (20.0 vs. 5.0%, P = 0.009), 90-day non-orthopedic readmissions (10.0 vs. 0.5%, P < 0.001), 90-day readmissions for infection (5.0 vs. 0.5%, P = 0.043), all-cause revisions (15.0 vs. 0.5%, P < 0.001), revisions for PJI (5.0 vs. 0%, P = 0.043), and revisions for peri-prosthetic fracture (10.0 vs. 0%, P < 0.001). Patients with stomas undergoing non-elective hip arthroplasties exhibited a longer mean LOS (12.1 vs. 7.0 days, P < 0.001) and increased 90-day all-cause readmissions (40.0 vs. 17.3%, P = 0.034), 90-day orthopedic readmissions (26.7 vs. 6.0%, P = 0.005), all-cause revisions (13.3 vs. 2.0%, P = 0.015), revisions for peri-prosthetic fracture (6.7 vs. 0%, P = 0.002), and revisions for aseptic loosening (6.7 vs. 0%, P = 0.002). There were no significant differences in readmission or revision rates between ostomy patients undergoing TKA and a matched control group. Patients undergoing hip arthroplasties with an open stoma are at an increased risk of hospital encounters and revisions, whereas TKA patients with stomas are not at increased risk of complications. These findings emphasize the importance of recognizing and addressing the unique challenges associated with this patient population.

Cementless TKA use as an alternative to cemented TKA in high BMI patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Obesity is prevalent, with nearly one-third of the world's population being classified as obese. In patients with high body mass index (BMI)/body mass undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA), there is an increase in strain placed on the implant fixation interfaces. As such, component fixation is a potential concern when performing TKA in the obese patient. To address the growing concerns around the longevity of implant fixation, some have advocated cementless over cemented fixation. However, there is no clear consensus on whether a cementless fixation has more favourable outcomes. The aim of this paper was to present a systematic review and meta-analysis of the existing evidence to establish if cementless TKA has a lower rate of aseptic loosening in high BMI patients when compared to cemented TKA procedures. A systematic review was performed, and the following databases Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (1946 to date), PubMed (1966 to date) and Excerpta Medica Database (1974 to date) were searched. All studies comparing cementless to cemented TKA in patients with BMI > 30 were considered. Meta-analysis compared aseptic loosening and all-cause revision between cemented and uncemented implant use in BMI > 30 patients. The search returned 91 articles in total; after duplicates were removed, the yield was 44 studies. Of the remaining studies that were assessed, three studies met the inclusion criteria for meta-analysis. The pooled odds ratio for all-cause revisions was 0.17 (95%, 0.08-0.36) in favour of uncemented implants (p < 0.01). The pooled odds ratio for aseptic loosening was 0.15 (95% confidence interval, 0.02-0.90) in favour of uncemented implants (p = 0.04). Meta-analysis demonstrated a significant decrease in all-cause revisions and revisions for aseptic loosening when using uncemented fixation in high BMI patients when compared to the use of cemented implants. The level of evidence is 1 for our systematic review.

TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY REVISION RATES IN MOBILE- VERSUS FIXED-BEARING IMPLANTS: A NEW ZEALAND JOINT REGISTRY STUDY

IntroductionThe mobile-bearing (MB) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) design was introduced with the aim of reducing polyethylene wear and component loosening seen in the fixed-bearing (FB) design. A recent joint registry study has revealed increased risk for all-cause revision, but not revision for infection, in MB-TKA. We used the New Zealand Joint Registry (NZJR) to compare all-cause revision rates, and revision rates for aseptic loosening of MB-TKA compared with fixed bearing (FB) TKA.MethodsAll patients who underwent a primary TKA registered in the NZJR between the 1st January 1999 to 31st December 2021 were identified. Analysis compared MB to FB designs, with sub analysis of implants from a single company. We identified 135,707 primary TKAs, with 104,074 (76.7%) FB-TKAs and 31,633 (23.3%) MB-TKAs recorded. We examined all-cause revision rates, reasons for revision and performed survival analyses.ResultsFor all-comers, MB-TKA had an all-cause revision rate of 0.43/100-component-years (OCY) compared with 0.42/OCY for FB-TKA (p=0.09). The all-cause revision rate was higher for those age &lt; 65 years (MB TKA 0.60/OCY vs. FB-TKA 0.59/OCY) compared to those &gt; 65 years at time of primary TKA (MB-TKA 0.29/OCY vs. FB-TKA 0.32/OCY), however there was no statistically significant difference between implant design in either age group (p=0.16 and p=0.64; respectively). Similarly, there was no difference in revision rates for aseptic loosening between implant designs. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis demonstrates no statistically significant difference in revision-free survival of implants, with both MB-TKA and FB-TKA demonstrating ∼93% revision free survival at 23 years.ConclusionsBoth FB- and MB-TKA demonstrated excellent survivorship, with no significant difference in all-cause revision rates or revision for aseptic loosening between implant designs.

Good Short-Term Survivorship of Constrained Condylar Revision Knee Implants With Medial Pivot Kinematics: A Level IV Retrospective Study

BackgroundThe need for revision total knee arthroplasty surgery is increasing worldwide, and, in many cases, a constrained implant is required to provide joint stability. The purpose of this study was to examine the early loosening and functional outcome of a novel constrained condylar (CCK) revision total knee system designed to have medial pivot (MP) kinematics. MethodsA retrospective cohort study was performed, collecting clinical data from all patients who underwent revision total knee arthroplasty using a novel MP CCK system with a minimum four-year clinical follow-up. Patient demographics, survivorship, complications, and Forgotten Joint Score were analyzed based upon chart review. ResultsThere were 49 patients available for follow-up, who had a 100% survivorship free of aseptic loosening. All-cause revision survivorship was 92%. There were 4 patients who subsequently underwent rerevision. The causes for rerevision included periprosthetic joint infection in 2 patients, coronal plane instability in one patient, and a traumatic knee dislocation in one patient. There were 45 patients who completed the Forgotten Joint Score, who had an average of 49.8 (± 32.8, range 6.25 to 100). ConclusionsAt 4 years, mid-term follow-up, this novel CCK revision total knee system designed to have MP kinematics had good patient-reported outcomes with no revision for aseptic loosening. Future studies should evaluate the mid- and long-term survivorship of this innovative implant.

Long-Term Outcomes of High-Flexion Design Total Knee Arthroplasty with a Short Posterior Flange.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of high-flexion total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using Vega Knee System (B. Braun, Aesculap) at a long-term follow-up and to analyze the implant survivorship. We enrolled 165 patients (232 knees) with a minimum 7-year follow-up after TKA (VEGA Knee System). For clinical assessment, range of motion (ROM), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), and Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) were used. For radiologic assessment, hip-knee-ankle angle, component position, and the existence of radiolucent lines and loosening were used. Survival analysis was conducted using the Kaplan-Meier method. The mean follow-up period was 9.8 years. The mean ROM increased from 124.4° to 131.4° at the final follow-up. The WOMAC score decreased from 38.5 to 17.4 at the final follow-up (p < 0.001). All 5 subscales of the KOOS improved at the final follow-up (all subscales, p < 0.001). Revision TKA was performed in 10 cases (4.3%), which included 9 cases of aseptic loosing and 1 case of periprostatic joint infection. Of the 9 aseptic loosening cases (3.9%), 8 cases (3.4%) were loosening of the femoral component and 1 case (0.4%) was loosening of the tibial component. When revision for any reason was considered an endpoint, the 10-year survivorship was 96.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 93.9%-98.5%). On the other hand, when revision for aseptic loosening was considered the endpoint, the 10-year survivorship was 96.6% (95% CI, 94.4%-98.8%). The Vega Knee System provided good clinical results in the long-term follow-up period. Although the VEGA Knee System showed acceptable implant survivorship, loosening of the femoral component occurred in about 3.4% of the patients. For more accurate evaluation of the survivorship of high-flexion design TKA with a short posterior flange, it is necessary to conduct more long-term follow-up studies targeting diverse races, especially Asians who frequently perform high-flexion activities.

Similar complications and outcomes with simultaneous versus staged bilateral total hip arthroplasty with the direct anterior approach: A comparative study.

Simultaneous bilateral total hip arthroplasty (THA) has demonstrated similar clinical outcomes to staged bilateral THA. However, there is scarce data regarding the early postoperative complications. This study compares simultaneous to staged bilateral THA with the direct anterior approach (DAA) regarding early complications and revision surgeries. This retrospective case-control study included all bilateral THAs, performed by DAA between 2013 and 2021 with a minimum follow-up of 6months. A total of 264 THAs (132 patients) were identified [simultaneous group (1T): 58 patients; staged group (2T): 74] with a mean follow-up of 54months. Complications and revisions, clinical outcomes, and days off work were assessed at the last follow-up. Moreover, blood loss was evaluated by the modified method of Mercuriali and Inghilleri. Blood loss was higher in the 1T group (1003mL 1T vs. 740mL 2T; p<0.001) but there was no significant difference in transfusion rates (5% 1T vs. 3% 2T; p=0.4). There were no complications in 1T, while the complication rate was 5.2% (n=6) in 2T (p=0.012). There were 5 revisions in the 2T group, including 2 debridements with polyethylene exchange and implant retention for early infections, 2 revisions for aseptic loosening in the same patient, and 1 revision due to fracture. Postoperative pain on D3 was equivalent in both groups (4.2 1T vs. 4.3 2T; p=0.79). The improvement in function according to the HHS at 2months was better in the 1T group, but not significant (36.8 1T vs. 32.9 2T; p=0.05). The total number of days off work was significantly higher in the 2T group (82.6days vs. 178.8; p=0.025). Simultaneous bilateral THA with the DAA seems to be a safe procedure, with no risk of increased early postoperative complications when compared to the staged procedure with similar functional outcomes and significantly fewer complications and days off work.

Can Isolated Tibial Component Revision Be an Alternative to Isolated Aseptic Loosening of the Tibial Component in Total Knee Arthroplasty?

This article reviews the information on isolated tibial component revision for isolated aseptic loosening of the tibial component in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). It summarizes the results of recent major studies published in PubMed since the beginning of the search engine until 28 March 2023. Sixty-five articles were found, of which only five were analyzed because they were directly related to the title of this article. At 5-year follow-up isolated tibial revision and both-component (femoral and tibial) revision for aseptic loosening did not differ with regard to failures of the implant, adverse events, and clinical outcomes.

Clinical and Biomechanical Evaluation of Mid-Level Constrained and Posterior-Stabilized Polyethylene Inserts in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: An Analysis of 12,674 Cases

BackgroundMid-level constraint polyethylene designs provide additional stability in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purposes of this study were to (1) compare the survivorship and reason for revision between mid-level inserts and posterior-stabilized (PS) used in primary TKA and (2) evaluate the biomechanical constraint characteristics of mid-level inserts. MethodsWe reviewed all cases of primary TKA performed at our institution from 2016 to 2019 using either PS or mid-level constrained inserts from 1 of 6 manufacturers. Data elements included patient demographics, implants, reasons for revision, and whether a manipulation under anesthesia was performed. We performed finite element analyses to quantify the varus/valgus and axial-rotation constraint of each mid-level constrained insert. A one-to-one propensity score matching was conducted between the patients with mid-level and PS inserts to match for variables, which yielded 2 cohorts of 3,479 patients. ResultsFor 9,163 PS and 3,511 mid-level TKAs, survivorship free from all-cause revision was estimated up to 5 years and was lower for mid-level than PS inserts (92.7 versus 94.1%, respectively, P = .004). When comparing each company’s mid-level insert to the same manufacturer’s PS insert, we found no differences in all-cause revision rates (P ≥ .91) or revisions for mechanical problems (P ≥ .97). Using propensity score matching between mid-level and PS groups, no significant differences were found in rates of manipulation under anesthesia (P = .72), all-cause revision (P = .12), revision for aseptic loosening (P = .07), and revision for instability (P = .45). Finite element modeling demonstrated a range in varus/valgus constraint from ±1.1 to >5°, and a range in axial-rotation constraint from ±1.5 to ±11.5° among mid-level inserts. ConclusionsDespite wide biomechanical variations in varus/valgus and axial-rotation constraint, we found minimal differences in early survivorship rates between PS and mid-level constrained knees.

TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY IN PATIENTS WITH OBESITY: A COMPARISON BETWEEN STEMMED, CEMENTLESS, AND UNSTEMMED TIBIAL COMPONENTS

AbstractObjectivesObesity is prevalent with nearly one third of the world's population being classified as obese. Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is an effective treatment option for high BMI patients achieving similar outcomes to non-obese patients. However, increased rates of aseptic loosening in patients with a high BMI have been reported. In patients with high BMI/body mass there is an increase in strain placed on the implant fixation interfaces. As such component fixation is a potential concern when performing TKA in the obese patient. To address this concern the use of extended tibial stems in cemented implants or cementless fixation have been advocated. Extend tibial stems are thought to improve implant stability reducing the micromotion between interfaces and consequently the risk of aseptic loosening. Cementless implants, once biologic fixation is achieved, effectively integrate into bone eliminating an interface. This retrospective study compared the use of extended tibial stems and cementless implants to conventional cemented implants in high BMI patients.MethodsFrom a prospectively maintained database of 3239 primary Attune TKA (Depuy, Warsaw, Indiana), obese patients (body mass index (BMI) &gt;30 kg/m²) were retrospectively reviewed. Two groups of patients 1) using a tibial stem extension [n=162] and 2) cementless fixation [n=163] were compared to 3) a control group (n=1426) with a standard tibial stem cemented implant. All operations were performed by or under the direct supervision of specialist arthroplasty surgeons. Analysis compared the groups with respect to class I, II, and III (BMI &gt;30kg/m², &gt;35 kg/m², &gt;40 kg/m²) obesity. The primary outcome measures were all-cause revision, revision for aseptic loosening, and revision for tibial loosening. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox regression models were used to compare the primary outcomes between groups. Where radiographic images at greater than 3 months post-operatively were available, radiographs were examined to compare the presence of peri-implant radiolucent lines.ResultsThe mean follow-up of 4.8, 3.4, and 2.5 years for cemented, stemmed, and cementless groups respectively. In total there were 34 all-cause revisions across all the groups with revision rates of 4.55, 5.50, and 0.00 per 1000-implant-years for cemented, stemmed, and cementless groups respectively. Survival Analysis did not show any significant differences between the three groups for all-all cause revision. There were 6 revisions for aseptic loosening (5 tibial and 1 femoral); all of which were in the standard cemented implant group. In contrast there were no revisions in the stemmed or cementless implant groups, however, this was not significant on survival analysis. Analysis looking at class I, II, and III obesity also did not show any significant differences in survival for all cause revision or aseptic loosening.ConclusionThis retrospective analysis showed that there were no revisions required for aseptic loosening when either a cemented stemmed or cementless implant were used in obese patients. These findings are in line with other studies showing that cementless fixation or extended stem implants are a reasonable option in obese patients who represent an increasing cohort of patients requiring TKR.Declaration of Interest(b) declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported:I declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research project.

ATTUNE TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT: IS THERE EVIDENCE OF INCREASED TIBIAL COMPONENT LOOSENING? A RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS OF 10,202 KNEES

AbstractObjectiveUp to 20% of patients can remain dissatisfied following TKR. A proportion of TKRs will need early revision with aseptic loosening the most common. The ATTUNE TKR was introduced in 2011 as successor to its predicate design The PFC Sigma (DePuy Synthes, Warsaw, In). However, following reports of early failures of the tibial component there have been ongoing concerns of increased loosening rates with the ATTUNE TKR. In 2017 a redesigned tibial baseplate (S+) was introduced, which included cement pockets and an increased surface roughness to improve cement bonding. Given the concerns of early tibial loosening with the ATTUNE knee system, this study aimed to compare revision rates and those specific to aseptic loosening of the ATTUNE implant in comparison to an established predicate as well as other implant designs used in a high-volume arthroplasty centre.MethodsThe Attune TKR was introduced to our unit in December 2011. Prior to this we routinely used a predicate design with an excellent long-term track record (PFC Sigma) which remains in use. In addition, other designs were available and used as per surgeon preference. Using a prospectively maintained database, we identified 10,202 patients who underwent primary cemented TKR at our institution between 01/04/2003–31/03/2022 with a minimum of 1 year follow-up (Mean 8.4years, range 1–20years): 1) 2406 with ATTUNE TKR (of which 557 were S+) 2) 4652 with PFC TKR 3) 3154 with other cemented designs. All implants were cemented using high viscosity cement. The primary outcome measures were all-cause revision, revision for aseptic loosening, and revision for tibial loosening. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox regression models were used to compare the primary outcomes between groups. Matched cohorts were selected from the ATTUNE subsets (original and S+) and PFC groups using the nearest neighbor method for radiographic analysis. Radiographs were assessed to compare the presence of radiolucent lines in the Attune S+, standard Attune, and PFC implants.ResultsAt a mean of 8.4 years follow-up, 308 implants underwent revision equating to 3.58 revisions per 1000 implant-years. The lowest risk of revision was noted in the ATTUNE cohort with 2.98 per 1000-implant-years where the PFC and All Other Implant groups were 3.15 and 4.4 respectively. Aseptic loosing was the most common cause for revision across all cemented implants with 76% (65/88) of involving loosening of the tibia. Survival analysis comparing the ATTUNE cohort to the PFC and All Other Cemented Implant cohorts showed no significant differences for: all-cause revision, aseptic loosening, or tibial loosening (p=0.15,0.77,0.47). Radiolucent lines were detected in 4.6%, 5.8%, and 5.0% of the ATTUNE S+, standard ATTUNE, and PFC groups respectively. These differences were not significant.ConclusionThis study represents the largest non-registry review of the original and S+ ATTUNE TKR in comparison to its predicate design as well as other cemented implants. There appears to be no significant increased revision rate for all-cause revision or aseptic loosening. Radiographic analysis also showed no significant difference in peri-implant radiolucency. It appears that concerns of early loosening may be unfounded.Declaration of Interest(a) fully declare any financial or other potential conflict of interest

Appearance and evolution of radiolucent lines below the tibial implant in primary total knee arthroplasty.

The aim of this study was to evaluate total knee arthroplasty (TKA) radiographically to detect the occurrence of radiolucent lines (RLL) under the tibial base plate and to determine what type of RLL may have a correlation with aseptic loosening (AL). The study had two hypotheses: (1) RLLs may have different radiological aspects and evolutions in time depending of different factors (2) Signs of micro- and/or macro-mobility of the implant are necessary before diagnosing aseptic loosening of the tibial component. Retrospective cohort study of 774 patients operated with a Vanguard TKA (Zimmer Biomet, Warsaw, IN, US) from 2007 to 2015. RLLs were recorded in a database and described according to their radiological aspect, localization, time of apparition, progression and eventual evolution to AL. Other collected parameters were pre- and post-operative HKA angles, amount of post-operative HKA correction, surgical, clinical and demographic data. 178/774 TKAs (23%) showed RLLs under the tibial base plate including 9 (1.2%) tibial implants needing revision for AL. Three different types and two aspects of RLLs were observed. Important deformity corrections or undercorrected implants were recognized as a mechanical risk factor for loosening. Elderly women with osteoporosis and young men with important pre-operative deformities were identified as clinical risk factors for RLLs. RLLs are frequently present at the epiphyseal bone/implant interface after total knee arthroplasty, but do not mean the implant is loose. They can be considered a sign of reduced epiphyseal surface fixation due to micro mobility of the tibial implant. Aseptic loosening can be observed radiologically when signs of macro-mobility of the implant are present at the metaphyseal level. III.

Low-Dose Irradiation and Rotating-Hinge Revision for the Treatment of Severe Idiopathic Arthrofibrosis Following Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Review of 60 Patients With a Mean 6-Year Follow-Up

BackgroundSevere idiopathic arthrofibrosis after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a challenging problem to treat. Low-dose irradiation may decrease fibro-osseous proliferation, while rotating-hinge (RH) revision allows for distal femur shortening and collateral ligament sacrifice. This study reports the clinical outcomes and implant survivorship in patients treated with low-dose irradiation and RH revision for severe idiopathic arthrofibrosis following TKA. MethodsA retrospective review was performed on 60 consecutive patients. Patients who had greater than 80° arc of knee motion or less than 15° flexion contracture were excluded. Mean follow-up was 6 years (range, 2 to 14). Kaplan-Meier survivorship analyses were performed, and logistic regressions were used to determine associations between preoperative patient characteristics and clinical outcomes. ResultsMedian flexion contracture and median terminal flexion at presentation were 20 and 70°, respectively; at final follow-up, 59 of 60 patients (98%) had ≤10° flexion contracture and 49 of 60 patients (82%) had ≥90° of flexion. The 10-year survivorship free from reoperation for any reason, revision for any reason, and revision for aseptic loosening were 63, 87, and 97%, respectively. There were 27% percent of patients who underwent a manipulation under anesthesia postoperatively, which was the most common reason for return to the operating room. A greater number of prior surgeries was significantly associated with worse range of motion at the final follow-up (P = .004). There were no known radiation-associated complications. ConclusionsPatients with severe idiopathic arthrofibrosis following TKA treated with low-dose irradiation and RH revision maintained a gain in knee range of motion of 60° with reliable flexion contracture correction at a mean 6-year follow-up. A manipulation under anesthesia was common in the postoperative period. Survivorship free from revision for aseptic loosening was excellent at 10 years.

Implant breakage and revision factors for modular fluted tapered stems in revision total hip arthroplasty.

Modular stems in revision total hip arthroplasties allow diaphyseal fixation and optimal restoration of the architecture of the proximal femur. Several studies report metaphyseal implant breakage having a negative impact on survivorship. The aim of the study was to evaluate the outcome of an uncemented modular fluted tapered stem (MFT) in revision surgery. In a retrospective study, 316 patients who had revision surgery using the same design of MFT implant (Modular Revision Stem [MRS], Lima Corporate, Italy) between 2012 and 2017 were identified. Patients were male in 51% of cases and mean age was 74 years. Indications were 110 periprosthetic fractures, 98 periprosthetic joint infection, 97 aseptic loosening, 10 instability and 1 other cause. Survivorship, complications, clinical and radiographic outcomes, were assessed. Mean follow-up was 5 years. There was no implant breakage. At 5-year follow-up, the survivorship, free from revision for aseptic loosening and free of revision for any reason were 96% and 87%, respectively. At last follow-up (8 years), these figures were 92% and 71%, respectively. 31 implants were revised. The risk of revision for any cause was higher for extreme length metaphyseal implants, hazard ratio was 3.7 (95% CI, 1.82-7.52). A mean stem subsidence of 9 mm was noted in 37 cases; 4 were revised for aseptic loosening. The Harris Hip Score at final follow-up was 82. At 5-year follow-up, the MFT implant showed a good survivorship and outcomes with no specific complications. Unlike literature reports, no specific complications occurred with this design. Stem junction positioning and therefore metaphyseal length may be key to optimise long-term survivorship. However, a longer follow-up is needed as implant breakage is more often seen after long implantation times.

CEMENTED THA WITH THE EXETER CONTEMPORARY FLANGED CUP IN PRIMARY TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY: MINIMUM TEN-YEAR FOLLOW-UP OF FULLY CEMENTED TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTIES WITH CONVENTIONAL POLYETHYLENE

We report the outcome of 320 primary Total Hip Arthroplasties (THA) with minimum 10-year follow-up (range 10-17 years, mean 12.6 years), performed by a single surgeon in Tauranga New Zealand, with the Exeter Contemporary Flanged all-polyethylene cup and Exeter femoral stem via a posterior approach. The aim of the study is to compare the results with the published results from the design centre and create a baseline cohort for further outcomes research in this centre.All patients were prospectively followed at 6 weeks, 1 year, 5 years, 10 years, (and 15 years when available). Of 333 cases that matched the inclusion criteria, 13 procedures in 12 patents were excluded because of concomitant bone grafting and/or supplementary cage fixation, leaving 320 primary THA procedures in 280 patients, including 26 bilateral procedures in 13 patients.Mean follow-up of the surviving cases was 12.6 (range 5.0-17.1) years. There were 12 revisions – 2 for fracture, 5 for instability, 1 for impingement pain and 4 for infection. There were no revisions for aseptic cup loosening. Kaplan-Meier survivorship with revision for aseptic loosening as the endpoint was 100% at 15.0 years (with minimum 40 cases remaining at risk). All-cause acetabular revision in 12 cases result in a Kaplan-Meier survival of 95.9% (95% CI: 93.5 to 98.3%).Cemented THA with the Exeter Contemporary Flanged cup and the Exeter stem is a durable combination with results that can be replicated outside of the design centre. The Exeter Contemporary Flanged cup has excellent survivorship at 15 years when used with the Exeter stem. Cemented THA with well-proven components should be considered the benchmark against which newer designs and materials should be compared.

Single Wedge Femoral Stem Designs are Associated With a Higher Risk for Revision After Cementless Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty

BackgroundCementless total hip arthroplasty (THA) femoral stems are the most commonly selected prostheses in the United States. Optimal stem geometry remains controversial with excellent survivorship reported for many designs. We compared cause-specific stem revision of single-wedge versus double-wedge designs from a multicenter US cohort. MethodsData from an integrated healthcare network’s total joint replacement registry were used to conduct a cohort study. Primary elective cementless THAs were identified (2001 to 2018). Implant exposure groups were classified by design geometry using the system proposed by Khanuja et al. Type 1 single-wedge (n = 11,082) and type 2 double-wedge (n = 32,380) designs were compared, and other design types were excluded; the final study cohort comprised 43,462 THAs. Cause-specific multivariable Cox regressions were used to evaluate risk for revision due to infection or aseptic reasons, including loosening, instability, periprosthetic fracture, or other reasons. ResultsAfter adjustment for covariates, a higher aseptic revision risk was observed for type 1 when compared to type 2 designs (hazard ratio = 1.91, 95% confidence interval = 1.33-2.75). When looking at specific revision reasons, revision for aseptic loosening (hazard ratio = 3.46, 95% confidence interval = 2.24-5.34) was higher for type 1 versus type 2 designs. No differences were found for septic revision, instability, periprosthetic fracture, or revisions for other reasons. ConclusionsType 1 single-wedge designs were found to have a higher risk of revision due to aseptic loosening relative to type 2 double-wedge designs. Femoral stem geometry should be considered when selecting a cementless femoral implant. Level of EvidenceLevel III.

Does Severe Ankle Deformity Affect the Outcomes of a 4th Generation Total Ankle Prosthesis? A 2- Year Follow-Up

Category: Ankle Arthritis Introduction/Purpose: Fourth generation ankle replacements benefit from improved surgical technique, respect for bony preservation, and increased surgeon awareness of operative indications. In some studies, pre-operative degree of deformity has been reported to influence survivorship, pain, and functional outcomes. The purpose of this multi-institutional study was to evaluate whether pre- operative deformity affects prospectively collected patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) of a fourth-generation total ankle replacement. Methods: Patients presenting for a total ankle replacement at 9 institutions were prospectively enrolled and implanted in a variety of academic and private settings. Each patient received an INFINITY ankle prosthesis. (Styker, Memphis, TN, USA). The degree of deformity was radiographically classified pre-operatively as severe if ankle varus or valgus was greater than 10° in the coronal plane. PROMs were recorded pre-operatively and at 6 months, 12 months, and 24-month intervals. The following PROMs were collected: Ankle Osteoarthritis Score (AOS), PROMIS Global Physical Health, and Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS). The preoperative and latest follow-up scores for patients with two years of follow-up were analyzed. Results: A total of 147 patients were enrolled in the study. Fifty-two patients exhibited a pre-operative ankle deformity of greater than 10° varus or valgus. Eighty-eight patients had 24 months of follow-up. All patients with severe deformity had significant improvements in all domains of the AOS, PROMIS, and FAOS Scores (p&lt;0001). The degree of deformity, ankle instability, or hindfoot arthritis did not impact the PROMs (AOA p=.2661, PROMIS p=.543, FAOS p=.684) in those with 2-year follow-up.There were three revisions with varying degrees of deformity. Two patients had revisions for aseptic loosening (6o valgus and 10o varus). One patient had a revision for tibial subsidence (11o varus). Conclusion: Severe pre-operative deformity did not impact PROMs in patients undergoing implantation with a 4th generation total ankle replacement. In carefully selected patients, greater deformity did not necessarily correlate with an increased need for revision surgery.

Early Outcomes of a Universal Femoral Component with an Ultracongruent Insert.

A primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) system was introduced with a modern universal femoral design with a wide range of size and constraint options to accommodate a variety of patient anatomy, while incorporating streamlined instrumentation for maximum operating room efficiency and economy. The purpose of this study is to review the early clinical outcomes and survivorship at minimum two-year follow up with this knee system. From September 2015 to December 2019, 797 patients (1004 knees) underwent primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) at our center with the TJO Klassic® Complete Primary Knee System (Total Joint Orthopedics Inc., Salt Lake City, Utah) with ultracongruent bearings and were available for study with minimum two-year follow up. All office and hospital records were reviewed for patient demographics, preoperative and postoperative clinical assessments, including range of motion, Knee Society Scores (KSS), University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) activity scales, complications, and reoperations. Mean follow up was 3.1 years (range, 2-6; standard deviation [SD] ±1.0). There were 471 female patients (59%) and 326 male patients (41%). Mean age at surgery was 69.3 years and mean body mass index was 32.9kg/m2. An all-polyethylene tibial component was used in 305 knees (30.4%) while a modular titanium tibial baseplate with polyethylene insert was used in 699 (69.6%). The patella was left unresurfaced in 381 knees (37.9%). KS scores, including pain component, clinical, and functional, as well as UCLA scores, all improved significantly (p<0.001). Two patients (3 knees) underwent revision. One patient required two-staged revision for treatment of infection in both knees, and one patient required patellar revision for aseptic loosening. Kaplan-Meier survival at 6.2 years was 98.4% (95% CI: ±0.97%) to endpoint of revision of any part for any cause and 99.6% (95% CI: ±0.36%) to endpoint of aseptic revision. At early minimum two-year follow up, this modern universal complete knee system used with ultracongruent bearings demonstrates excellent clinical outcomes and survival.

Modular Fluted Tapered Stems for Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures: Excellent Results in 171 Cases.

Modular fluted tapered (MFT) stems have advanced treatment of Vancouver B2 and B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures, but series to date have been limited with respect to cohort size and follow-up duration. The purpose of this study was to determine implant survivorship, radiographic results, complications, and clinical outcomes of Vancouver B2 and B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures treated with MFT stems in a large series of patients. We identified 171 Vancouver B2 (109) and B3 (62) periprosthetic femoral fractures treated with an MFT stem between 2000 and 2018 using our institutional total joint registry. The mean age was 75 years, 50% were female, and the mean body mass index was 29 kg/m2. The median stem diameter was 18 mm and median stem length was 210 mm. The cumulative incidences of revision and reoperation with death as the competing risk were calculated, radiographs were reviewed, and clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Harris hip score (HHS). The mean follow-up was 5 years. The 10-year cumulative incidence of any revision was 10%. There were 17 revisions, of which only 3 were for the distal fluted portion of the MFT stem. Revision indications included periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) (n = 6) and dislocation (n = 11). The 10-year cumulative incidence of any reoperation was 15%. In addition to the above 17 revisions, there were 7 reoperations for superficial wound complications (n = 4), Vancouver B1 periprosthetic femoral fracture (n = 1), vascular occlusion (n = 1), and acetabular cartilage degeneration requiring an acetabular component (n = 1). Radiographically, there was 1 fracture nonunion. All unrevised MFT stems were radiographically well fixed. Subsidence of ≥5 mm occurred in 11%, but all implants were stable at the most recent follow-up. The mean HHS was 75 at 2 years (n = 71). In this large series of 171 Vancouver B2 and B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures treated with MFT stems, we found that such constructs were associated with a high rate of fracture healing and provided extremely reliable and durable implant fixation, with no revisions for aseptic loosening. Dislocation and PJI were the most common complications. Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Excellent Long-Term Survival Rate of Polished, Tapered, Cemented Stems in Patients Aged 35 Years or Younger With Avascular Necrosis or Inflammatory Arthritis of the Hip.

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) for avascular necrosis (AVN) or inflammatory arthritis (IA) comes with a relatively high risk of aseptic stem loosening, especially in young patients. There are limited long-term data on the survivorship of polished, tapered, cemented stems in this population. We therefore performed a single-center retrospective study investigating the survival of this particular stem type in young patients with AVN or IA. All patients aged ≤35 years who had received a THA for AVN or IA operated on by the senior author between 1990 and 2010 at the University Hospitals Leuven were identified. In total, 85 THAs in 62 patients were included. Primary endpoint was revision of the femoral component for aseptic loosening. Secondary endpoints were revision of the acetabular component for aseptic loosening, revision for other reasons, and the presence of radiolucencies around the components. The mean follow-up for the entire cohort was 18.0±5.3 years (range 8.0-28.9). Taking revision for aseptic loosening as endpoint, the survival of cemented stems was 100% after 15 years and 95.1% after 20 years. Survival of uncemented cups (91.3%) was significantly better than survival of cemented cups (50.3%) after 20 years of follow-up for aseptic loosening. Taking revision for any reason as endpoint, the survival of THAs with uncemented and cemented cups was 90% and 43.1% at 20 years respectively. Radiolucencies developed in the cement mantles around 11 of the 81 nonrevised stems, mainly in zones 1 and 7. In this cohort of young patients with high-risk profiles for aseptic stem loosening, polished, tapered, cemented stems showed excellent long-term survival rates and they therefore remain a viable alternative to uncemented stem designs.