Reverse Total Arthroplasty Research Articles

A Short-term clinical and radiologic outcomes of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty with navigation system in Asian population: A retrospective comparative study

BackgroundIn reverse total arthroplasty (rTSA), glenoid component positioning is a critical factor for outcomes especially in Asian population with smaller glenoid. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and radiologic outcomes of rTSA with and without the navigation system with a minimum follow-up of two years in Asian population. MethodsThis was a retrospective comparative study of 33 rTSA with the navigation system (NAV group) and 40 conventional rTSA (CON group). Radiologic measurements regarding the position of the glenoid component, glenoid vault perforation by the central cage, and scapular notching, as well as clinical outcomes including range of motion (ROM), functional scores and complications were compared. Number, length, and angulation of screws were assessed. ResultsThe mean age was 73.9 ± 5.9 years with a mean follow-up of 30.1 ± 6.4 months. The NAV group more frequently utilized augmented baseplate (P < 0.001), showed less superior inclination (P = 0.030) and had lower incidence of glenoid vault perforation (P = 0.040). The length of superior (P = 0.001) and inferior screws (P = 0.045) was longer in the NAV group. In the NAV group compared to the CON group, more inferior orientation of superior screws (P < .001), more anterior orientation for inferior screws (P = 0.031), and anterior screws (P = 0.003) were observed. The NAV group showed significantly less penetration into the suprascapular fossa by a superior screw (P = 0.007). Final ROM, functional scores, and complications showed no significant differences between two groups. ConclusionIn short-term follow-up, the use of a navigation system in rTSA showed no significant difference in clinical outcomes and complications compared to conventional implantation. However, it enabled a lower superior inclination and a reduced glenoid vault perforation by the central cage, simultaneously allowing for the insertion of longer peripheral screws in a safer direction compared to conventional implantation.

Intraoperative changes to the components planned preoperatively do not affect short-term, postoperative clinical outcomes after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty

BackgroundThree-dimensional, computed tomography preoperative planning has been increasingly adopted among shoulder arthroplasty surgeons. Prior studies have not examined outcomes in patients undergoing reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in which the surgeon implanted prostheses that deviated from the preoperative plan compared to patients in which the surgeon followed the preoperative plan. The hypothesis of this study was that clinical outcomes would not be different between patients in which the surgeon utilized components that deviated from those predicted in the preoperative plan and patients in which the surgeon followed the preoperative plan. MethodsA retrospective review of patients that had preoperative planning for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty from April 2017 through February 2022 was performed. Patients were stratified into two groups: patients in which the surgeon utilized components that deviated from those anticipated by the preoperative plan (changed group), and patients in which the surgeon utilized all of the components anticipated by the preoperative plan (as planned group). Patient-reported outcomes including the Western Ontario Osteoarthritis Index, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, Simple Shoulder Test, and Shoulder Activity Level were recorded preoperatively, at one year, and at two years. Preoperative and one-year postoperative range of motion was recorded. ResultsOne hundred and eighty-nine patients were included in this study. One hundred forty-seven patients had intraoperative changes to their preoperative plan and 42 patients underwent reverse total arthroplasty without changes to their preoperative plan. There was no difference determined between any patient-reported outcome score at the one- and two-year postoperative time points between the as planned group and the changed group. No differences were found in range of motion between groups. Patients initially planned to undergo anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty that were intraoperatively converted to a reverse total shoulder arthroplasty had equivalent outcomes compared to those that had 1) other intraoperative deviations or 2) had no changes to their original preoperative plan. ConclusionPatients undergoing reverse total shoulder arthroplasty that had an intraoperative deviation to the components utilized in the preoperative plan had equivalent 1) patient-reported outcomes at one and two years after surgery and 2) range of motion one year after surgery compared to those that did not change from the preoperative plan. This study suggests it is safe to make intraoperative changes to the components utilized in the preoperative plan without concern for inferior postoperative outcomes when performing reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

An evidence-based approach to managing unexpected positive cultures in shoulder arthroplasty.

Unexpected positive cultures (UPCs) are very commonly found during shoulder arthroplasty when surgeons send intraoperative cultures to rule out periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) without clinical or radiographic signs of infection. Cutibacterium acnes is thought to be the most common bacteria cultured in this setting; however, the implications of an unexpected positive result are neither well defined nor agreed upon within the literature. The current review evaluates the incidence of UPCs and C acnes in reverse total arthroplasty; the clinical significance, if any, of these cultures; and various prognostic factors that may affect UPC incidence or recovery following PJI. A systematic review was performed with PRISMA guidelines using PubMed, CINAHL, and Scopus databases. Inclusion criteria included studies published from January 1, 2000, to May 20, 2021, that specifically reported on UPCs, native or revision shoulder surgery, and any study that directly addressed one of our 6 proposed clinical questions. Two independent investigators initially screened 267 articles for further evaluation. Data on study design, UPC rate/speciation, UPC risk factors, and UPC outcomes were analyzed and described. A total of 22 studies met the inclusion criteria for this study. There was a pooled rate of 27.5% (653/2373) deep UPC specimen positivity, and C acnes represented 76.4% (499/653) of these positive specimens. Inanimate specimen positivity was reported at a pooled rate of 20.1% (29/144) across 3 studies. Male patients were more likely to have a UPC; however, the significance of prior surgery, surgical approach, and type of surgery conflicted across multiple articles. Patient-reported outcomes and reoperation rates did not differ between positive-UPC and negative-UPC patients. The utilization of antibiotics and treatment regimen varied across studies; however, the reinfection rates following surgery did not statistically differ based on the inclusion of antibiotics. UPCs are a frequent finding during shoulder surgery and C acnes represents the highest percentage of cultured bacteria. Various preoperative risk factors, surgical techniques, and postoperative treatment regimens did not significantly affect the incidence of UPCs as well as the clinical outcomes for UPC vs. non-UPC patients. A standardized protocol for treatment and follow-up would decrease physician uncertainty when faced with a UPC from shoulder surgery. Given the results of this review, shoulder surgeons can consider not drastically altering the postoperative clinical course in the setting of UPC with no other evidence of PJI.

EXPERIENCIA CLINICA EN PROTESIS REVERSA DE HOMBRO EN CENTRO MEDICO NAVAL

Problem Statement: The total reverse arthroplasty of man is a suitable therapeutic option for shoulder osteoarthritis associated with cuff rotator tear, massive rotator cuff tear mainly, medializing the rotation center of the shoulder joint, thus replacing the supraspinatus, recovering degree of freedom of movement of the shoulder with the promising clinical results described in the literature, interest has arisen on the part of the traumatology and orthopedics service to evaluate the clinical evolution of the patients operated with this procedure, and generate the knowledge that can be integrated later in studies of May scientific validity. Objective: Objective: to describe the clinical outcome of patients undergoing surgery, with total reverse shoulder arthroplasty, after 6 months of surgery in a naval medical center. Methodology: Type of study: an observational, cross-sectional, retrospective study was carried out. Population: 8 patients que fueron intervenidos quirúrgicamente con artroplastia total reversa de hombro. The DASH, Constan and Simple Shoulder Test tests were applied, which were applied preoperatively and after 6 months of the surgical intervention, and the description and analysis of data was carried out with a statistical program. Results: there was clinical improvement in most patients on the DASH scale with average disability improvement of 59% to 36%, Constan scale from 25.7 to 49.6, Simple Shoulder Test from 3.1 to 5.6. Conclusion. The total reverse shoulder prosthesis is a suitable alternative with adequate clinical results for patients with rotator cuff tear, massive rotator cuff tear.

PROMIS CAT Forms Demonstrate Responsiveness in Patients Following Reverse Total Arthroplasty Across Numerous Health Domains

PROMIS CAT Forms Demonstrate Responsiveness in Patients Following Reverse Total Arthroplasty Across Numerous Health Domains

ESTES recommendations on proximal humerus fractures in the elderly.

The section for the skeletal trauma and sport's injuries of the European Society for Trauma and Emergency Surgery (ESTES) appointed a task force group to reach a consensus among European countries on proximal humeral fractures. The task force group organized several consensus meetings until a paper with final recommendations was confirmed during the ESTES Executive Board meeting in Berlin on 25 October 2018. The Recommendations compare conservative and four possible operative treatment options (ORIF, nailing, hemi- and total reverse arthroplasty) and enable the smallest common denominator for the surgical treatment among ESTES members.

Revision of failed shoulder arthroplasty: epidemiology, etiology, and surgical options

Our aim was to analyze the epidemiology, etiologies, and revision options for failed shoulder arthroplasty from 2 tertiary centers. From 1993 to 2013, 542 failed arthroplasties were revised in 540 patients (65% women): 224 hemiarthroplasties (HAs, 41%), 237 anatomictotal shoulder arthroplasties (TSAs, 44%) and 81 reverse total arthroplasties (RSAs, 15%). Data about patients, pathology, and reintervention procedures, as well as intraoperative data, were analyzed from our 2 local registries that prospectively captured all the revision procedures. Patients had an average follow-up period of 8.7 years. The revision rate was 12.7% for HAs, 6.7% for TSAs, and 3.9% for RSAs. HAs were revised earlier (33 ± 40 months) than RSAs (47 ± 150 months) and TSAs (69 ± 61 months). Glenoid failure was a major cause of reintervention: erosion in HAs (29%) or loosening in TSAs (37%) and RSAs (24%). Instability was another major cause of reintervention: 32% in RSAs, 20% in TSAs, and 13% in HAs. Humeral implant loosening led to revision in 10% of RSAs, 6% of HAs, and 6% of TSAs. Multiple reinterventions were required in 21% of patients, mainly for instability (26%) and/or infection (25%). The final implant was an RSA in 48%, especially when associated with cuff insufficiency, instability, and/or bone loss. Final reimplantation was possible in 90% of cases, with the remaining 10% treated with a resection or spacer. Glenoid failure and instability are the most common causes of revision. Soft-tissue insufficiency and/or infection results in multiple revisions. Surgeons must recognize all complications so that they can be addressed at the first revision operation and avoid further reinterventions. RSA was the most common final revision implant.

Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Plate Osteosynthesis via a Deltoidsplitting Approach with Strut Allograft for the Treatment of Displaced 3- or 4-part Proximal Humeral Fractures.

BackgroundThis study introduces a surgical technique with good clinical outcome useful in the treatment of osteoporotic displaced 3- or 4-part proximal humeral fractures.MethodsFrom May 2014 to February 2016, 16 patients with displaced 3- or 4-part proximal humeral fractures were treated by application of a locking plate with an endosteal strut allograft via a deltoid splitting approach with a minimum follow-up of 12 months. The allograft was inserted through a fractured gap of the greater tuberosity to support the humeral head and then fixed by a locking plate with meticulous soft tissue dissection to protect the axillary nerve. Surgical outcomes were evaluated by the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) and visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, radiological imaging, and clinical examination. Fixation failure on radiographs was defined as a >5° loss of neck shaft angle (NSA) compared to that on an immediate postoperative radiograph. Avascular necrosis (AVN) of the humeral head was also evaluated.ResultsIn all cases, complete union was achieved. The ASES and VAS scores were improved to 85.4 ± 2.1 and 3.2 ± 1.3, respectively. Twelve patients (75.0%) had greater than a 5° change in NSA; the average NSA change was 3.8°. Five patients (31.3%) had unsatisfactory ranges of motion exhibiting a <100° active forward flexion. No axillary nerve injuries or AVN were observed at the last follow-up. One patient was converted to reverse total arthroplasty due to severe pain and functional deficit.ConclusionsMinimally invasive fixation via a locking compression plate and an endosteal fibula strut allograft in Neer classification 3-or 4-part fractures with severe osteoporosis in elderly patients can achieve good clinical results.

Classifications in Brief: The Nerot-Sirveaux Classification for Scapular Notching.

Classifications in Brief: The Nerot-Sirveaux Classification for Scapular Notching.

Hemiarthroplasty versus reverse shoulder arthroplasty in 4-part displaced fractures of the proximal humerus: Multicenter retrospective study

IntroductionComplex 4-part fractures of the proximal humerus are one of the most difficult fractures to manage. For several years, reverse total arthroplasty (RSA) has been proposed as an alternative to hemiarthroplasty (HA) when internal fixation is insufficient. The goal of this study was to compare the short and intermediate term results of these 2 different types of arthroplasty. Materials and methodsIn a retrospective, multicenter study, 57 HA and 41 RSA were reviewed after a follow-up of at least 2 years. The clinical evaluation was based on the absolute and adjusted Constant scores, Simple shoulder value (SSV) and the quick-DASH scores. The radiological assessment included standard radiological tests. ResultsAfter a mean follow-up of 39 months, the RSA group had a significantly higher adjusted Constant score than the HA group (83% vs 73%, respectively P=0.02). However, there was no significant difference in the absolute Constant score, the quick-DASH or the SSV scores. Active anterior elevation was better in the RSA group, while internal rotation was better in the HA group (130° vs 112°, P=0.01; sacrum vs L3, P=0.03). There was no significant difference in external rotation (28° vs 23°, P=0.31). The rate of complications was higher in the HA group than in the RSA group (24% vs 10%, P=0.01). The radiological rate of union of the greater tuberosity was similar in both groups (70%) and scapular notching was found in 23% of the RSA group. ConclusionThe short and intermediate term clinical outcomes are better with RSA than with HA. The complication rate is higher with HA. Nevertheless, scapular notching occurred in more than 20% of patients with RSA, suggesting that care should be taken when using this prosthesis in young, active patients.

Protesi di spalla in acuto

Shoulder replacement for proximal humeral fractures can be performed with two different prostheses: anatomical hemiarthroplasty and reverse total arthroplasty. A careful evaluation of the fracture pattern and the patient, in addition to a rigorous operative technique, are the prerequisites for optimizing the clinical-functional outcome.

Increasing Incidence of Shoulder Arthroplasty in the United States

The number of total shoulder arthroplasties performed in the United States increased slightly between 1990 and 2000. However, the incidence of shoulder arthroplasty in recent years has not been well described. The purpose of the present study was to examine recent trends in shoulder hemiarthroplasty and total shoulder arthroplasty along with the common reasons for these surgical procedures in the United States. We modeled the incidence of shoulder arthroplasty from 1993 to 2008 with use of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample. On the basis of hemiarthroplasty and total shoulder arthroplasty cases that were identified with use of surgical procedure codes, we conducted a design-based analysis to calculate national estimates. While the annual number of hemiarthroplasties grew steadily, the number of total shoulder arthroplasties showed a discontinuous jump (p < 0.01) in 2004 and increased with a steeper linear slope (p < 0.01) since then. As a result, more total shoulder arthroplasties than hemiarthroplasties have been performed annually since 2006. Approximately 27,000 total shoulder arthroplasties and 20,000 hemiarthroplasties were performed in 2008. More than two-thirds of total shoulder arthroplasties were performed in adults with an age of sixty-five years or more. Osteoarthritis was the primary diagnosis for 43% of hemiarthroplasties and 77% of total shoulder arthroplasties in 2008, with fracture of the humerus as the next most common primary diagnosis leading to hemiarthroplasty. The number of shoulder arthroplasties, particularly total shoulder arthroplasties, is growing faster than ever. The use of reverse total arthroplasty, which was approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration in November 2003, may be part of the reason for the greater increase in the number of total shoulder arthroplasties. A long-term follow-up study is warranted to evaluate total shoulder arthroplasty in terms of patient outcomes, safety, and implant longevity.