Return Of Bowel Function Research Articles

Complications associated with loop ileostomy reversal delayed greater than twelve months.

Diverting loop ileostomy is performed after colectomy to allow for anastomotic healing, and prevention of pelvic sepsis when an anastomotic leak occurs. There is no consensus on the optimal timing of ileostomy closure, and there is limited data on complications associated with ileostomy closure greater than 12 months after creation. The aim of this study is to investigate outcomes of delayed loop ileostomy closure greater than 12 months after creation. Patients undergoing loop ileostomy closure between 2013 and 2023 at Carilion Medical Center, in Roanoke, VA were reviewed. Cohorts compared were defined as Control Group (closure < 4 months) and Delayed Group (closure > 12 months). Demographics and outcomes were compared. Statistical comparisons were performed using either Wilcoxon rank sum test, Pearson's Chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test. Statistical modeling included binary logistic regression for 30-day readmissions and a generalized linear modeling for days till bowel function returns. Adjusted odds ratios, confidence intervals, and p-values were calculated. There were 135 patients in the Control Group and 19 patients in the Delayed Group. Demographics were similar between the groups except for a higher percentage of patients with diabetes, renal failure and history of cancer in Delayed Group (all p < 0.05). Operative time was longer for Delayed loop ileostomy closure (p < 0.05). Patients in the Delayed Group demonstrated a higher hospital readmission rate within 30 days (p < 0.05). Both groups had similar return of bowel function on post-operative day 2, similar length of stay, and similar rates of postoperative ileus (p = NS). Delayed loop ileostomy closure more than 12 months after creation does not delay return of bowel function but may lead to higher hospital readmission rates within 30 days.

Comparing the Postoperative Analgesic Efficacy of Ketorolac and Tramadol After Open Inguinal Hernia Mesh Repair: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Background Opioids are the mainstay for postoperative pain control. However, due to the increasing dependence on opioids and their side effects, multiple adjuncts are used to reduce opioid consumption, including non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Inguinal hernia repair is one of the most common procedures performed by general surgeons worldwide. Despite various advancements in operative techniques, postoperative pain remains a major risk factor for morbidity and delayed hospital discharge following surgery. Objective The objective of this study was to compare ketorolac with tramadol for postoperative pain control following open inguinal hernia mesh repair. Methods This was a randomized controlled trial. Sixty patients undergoing unilateral primary open inguinal hernia repair with mesh were randomly divided into two groups: Group A received injection ketorolac intravenously postoperatively, while Group B received injection tramadol intravenously following surgery. Pain scores and vitals were measured at two, six, 12, and 24 hours post procedure. Other secondary outcomes included the time for nausea to stop, time to pass flatus, and time to start ambulation. Data was analyzed by independent-sample t-test using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 30.0 (Release 2024; IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, United States); a p-value of < 0.05 was considered significant. Results Pain scores were lower in the ketorolac group when compared to tramadol. However, patients in the tramadol group had nausea for a longer duration, delayed return of bowel function, and took longer to start ambulation. There was no significant difference in vitals. Conclusion Injection ketorolac, when used in isolation, provides more effective postoperative analgesia along with fewer side effects when compared to tramadolin inguinal hernia repair.

Ideal Local Anesthetic for Intraperitoneal Gallbladder Bed Infiltration Following Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Background Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the gold standard operation for symptomatic cholelithiasis; however, pain remains a major factor in increasing morbidity and length of hospital stay. Infiltration of the gallbladder bed with a local anesthetic has been shown to improve postoperative pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy, although it is unclear which local anesthetic provides superior pain relief. Objective The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of various local anesthetics on postoperative pain when instilled intraperitoneally in the gallbladder bed following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Methods Patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomies were randomized into three groups of 30 patients each, depending on the local anesthetic instilled in the gallbladder bed: lignocaine (Group A), bupivacaine (Group B), or a combination of lignocaine and bupivacaine (Group C). Pain was measured using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at two, six, 12, and 24 hours following surgery. Secondary outcomes included vitals, rescue analgesic use, return of bowel function, time to ambulation, and presence of nausea. Results Group C showed the lowest pain scores at all time points compared to the other groups (p < 0.05). Mean arterial pressures and heart rates were lower in Group C than in Group A at two and 24 hours. Return of bowel function and time to ambulation was earlier in Group C than in Group B. No significant complications were noted in any of the groups. Conclusion We conclude that a combination of lignocaine and bupivacaine instillation in the gallbladder bed provides the most effective pain relief following laparoscopic cholecystectomy, without significant complications at the doses used.

Total extra-peritoneal approach to radical cystectomy with ureterostomy: A novel technique for the elderly and frail

ObjectivesRadical cystectomy with urinary diversion is the gold standard treatment for bladder cancer (high-risk/muscle invasive). The transperitoneal approach is associated with significant gastrointestinal complications like ileus. In the elderly and frail with a single functional kidney, we describe an extraperitoneal technique of radical cystectomy, with a ureterostomy, to be performed without general anesthesia. Materials and methodsThe elderly, frail, and high-risk candidates for general anesthesia, with a prior history of nephroureterectomy with a second primary muscle-invasive bladder cancer, were chosen. All patients underwent the described procedure under combined spinal and epidural anesthesia. The posterior dissection was retrograde, caudal to cranial, with the peritoneum being opened only for resection of the dome. A cutaneous ureterostomy was fashioned on the side of the functional kidney. Peri-operative parameters were assessed for early recovery in this high-risk group. ResultsThe mean age was 82 years (range: 73–91), with Charleson Comorbidity Index 5, and were all deemed unfit for neoadjuvant chemotherapy. With a median duration of 127.5 minutes, an average blood loss of 225ml, and no patient requiring general anesthesia; early ambulation, early return of bowel function, and a lesser hospital stay (7 days) with minimal morbidity were achieved. Negative surgical margins were achieved in all cases, with a mean harvest of 29 lymph nodes. Only 1 patient developed stomal stenosis. The cause-specific survival (CSS) is 100% at 2 years. ConclusionsThe highlighting features are the early return of bowel function (flatus passage on day 1) and the avoidance of the cardio-pulmonary complications of general anesthesia. The extraperitoneal cystectomy offers a promising alternative in this select group and warrants further studies to extrapolate this technique for bilateral urinary drainage.

Comparison of different types of single-port laparoscopic surgery in posterior uterine fibroid resection

This study aims to objectively assess the effect of three surgical approaches for posterior uterine fibroid resection: transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS), vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) in prone position (vNOTES-P), and vNOTES in the lithotomy position (vNOTES-L). A retrospective analysis was conducted on data pertaining to all patients who underwent vNOTES and LESS for single posterior fibroids at our institution from January 2023 to July 2023. Patients were categorized into three groups based on the surgical approach: vNOTES-P group (n = 30), vNOTES-L group (n = 17), and LESS group (n = 32). Comparative analysis was performed on the demographic characteristics and perioperative outcomes among the three groups of patients. All 79 patients underwent surgery without the need for conversion to laparotomy. There were no statistically significant differences among the LESS group, vNOTES-P group, and vNOTES-L group in terms of operative time, intraoperative blood loss, and perioperative complication rates. In the vNOTES-L group, two patients required conversion to LESS during surgery. Patients had faster return of bowel function (less time to flatus) in the vNOTES group compared to the LESS group (P < 0.05). However, three cases of postoperative infection occurred in the vNOTES group, while none were reported in the LESS group. Compared to LESS, vNOTES demonstrates significant advantages in alleviating postoperative pain, shortening time to passage of flatus, speeding recovery and enhancing cosmetic outcomes. Particularly, vNOTES-P for posterior uterine fibroid resection, as an emerging surgical approach, offers certain advantages in facilitating surgical maneuverability and reducing operative time, rendering it more suitable for posterior uterine fibroid resection.

Clinical efficacy of enhanced recovery surgery in Da Vinci robot-assisted pancreatoduodenectomy

Da Vinci robot-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy offers advantages, including minimal invasiveness, precise, and safe procedures. This study aimed to investigate the clinical effectiveness of implementing enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) concepts in Da Vinci robot-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy. A retrospective analysis was conducted on clinical data from 62 patients who underwent Da Vinci robot-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy between January 2018 and December 2022. Among these patients, 30 were managed with ERAS principles, while 32 were managed using traditional perioperative management protocols. Surgical time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative oral intake time, time to return of bowel function, time to ambulation, visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores, fluid replacement volume, length of hospital stay, total hospital expenses, complications, and patient satisfaction were recorded and compared between the two groups. Postoperative follow-up included assessment of postoperative functional scores, reoperation rates, SF-36 quality of life scores, and survival rates. The average follow-up time was 35.6 months (range: 12–56 months). There were no statistically significant differences in general characteristics, including age, surgical time, intraoperative blood loss, and preoperative medical history between the two groups (P > 0.05). Compared to the control group, the intervention group had an earlier postoperative oral intake time, faster return of bowel function, rapid ambulation, and shorter hospital stays (P < 0.05). The intervention group also had lower postoperative VAS scores, lower fluid replacement volume, lower total hospital expenses, and a lower rate of complications (P < 0.05). Patient satisfaction was higher in the intervention group (P < 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in two-year functional scores, reoperation rates, quality of life scores, and survival rates (P > 0.05). Implementing ERAS principles in Da Vinci robot-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy substantially expedited postoperative recovery, lowered pain scores, and diminished complications. However, there were no notable differences in long-term outcomes between the two groups.

Comparative Analysis of Early Versus Traditional Feeding Protocols in Elective Lower Segment Cesarean Sections.

Background Postoperative care following elective lower segment cesarean section (LSCS) traditionally involves delayed oral feeding. However, recent evidence suggests that early feeding may enhance recovery and improve patient outcomes. This study aimed to compare the recovery outcomes of elective LSCS patients between early feeding and traditional feeding protocols. Methods This prospective, comparative study was conducted at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Government Medical College (GMC) Budaun, over nine months. Women aged 18 to 40 years undergoing elective LSCS with singleton pregnancies and gestational ages between 37 and 42 weeks were included. Participants were randomized into two groups: the early feeding group (EFG) and the traditional feeding group (TFG). The EFG received oral intake as early as two hours post-surgery, progressing to a regular diet within six to eight hours. The TFG followed standard postoperative protocols, beginning oral intake after 12-24 hours. Primary outcomes included time to return of bowel function and length of hospital stay. Secondary outcomes were patient satisfaction and complication rates. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 22.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY), with p-values < 0.05 considered statistically significant. Results The study included 94 participants (EFG: n = 44, TFG: n = 50). The EFG showed significantly faster return of bowel function, with time to first flatus (23.9 ± 6.2 vs. 34.1 ± 8.8 hours, p < 0.0001) and first stool (54.6 ± 8.5 vs. 91.3 ± 12.3 hours, p < 0.0001). Length of hospital stay was shorter in the EFG (4.3 ± 1.1 vs. 6.7 ± 1.4 days, p < 0.0001). Visual analog scale (VAS) scores before discharge were higher in the EFG (94.4 ± 8.7 vs. 81.4 ± 9.5, p < 0.0001), indicating greater patient satisfaction. Complication rates, including nausea, vomiting, abdominal distension, and wound infections, did not differ significantly between groups. Conclusion Early feeding post-elective LSCS significantly enhances recovery, as evidenced by quicker return of bowel function, reduced hospital stay, and higher patient satisfaction without increasing complication rates. These findings support revising postoperative care protocols to incorporate early feeding strategies.

550. INTRAOPERATIVE VOLUME STATUS DOES NOT AFFECT ERAS OUTCOMES OR COMPLICATION RATES IN HYBRID ROBOTIC ASSISTED MINIMALLY INVASIVE ESOPHAGECTOMY

Abstract Background Intraoperative volume management in patients undergoing esophagectomy is nuanced. Data is conflicting in regards to the benefits of volume restrictive versus liberal approaches. Within a hybrid robotic assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (hRAMIE) population undergoing oncologic resection there is a paucity of data regarding intraoperative volume status as it affects postoperative outcomes and no data regarding the impact on enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) outcomes. Methods Demographics, anthropometrics, cancer characteristics, and perioperative outcome data were gathered between January 2020 and December 2023 at a single, tertiary referral center in patients undergoing oncologic hRAMIE. Intraoperative volume status was defined, as in other reports, by identifying the median operative volume rate per hour and normalizing via the Du Bois body surface area; above or below 225 mL/hour/m2. ERAS outcomes were reported. Complications were stratified in accordance with the Esophagectomy Complications Consensus Group guidelines. Continuous variables were compared via Mann-Whitney U-Test; categorical via Fisher's Exact. Alpha set to 0.05. Results 96 patients (46 volume restrictive, 45 volume liberal) were identified. There were no differences in age, sex, body mass index, ASA class, Charlson Comorbidity Index, cancer histology, location, rate of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, or chemoradiotherapy. ERAS outcomes analysis reveals no statistical difference in ICU length of stay, mobilization times, return of bowel function, or length of stay (Table 1). Complications were reported in 45.8% of patients and did not differ between groups (p=0.8934). Pulmonary complications were most frequent (total 21.9%; restrictive 17.4%, liberal 28.9%, p=0.1422) followed by anastomotic leak (total 12.5%; restrictive 17.4%, liberal 8.9%, p=0.3681). Conclusion The current study demonstrates no impact of volume restriction on perioperative outcomes, ERAS benchmarks, or length of stay in patients undergoing hRAMIE for esophageal cancer. Data suggests that minimally invasive approaches may be associated with less total body and pleural inflammatory mediator generation, perhaps limiting susceptibility to variation in volume status. Highly powered, multicenter retrospective minimally invasive esophagectomy and volume status investigation is warranted prior to proceeding with controlled trial.

Impact of minimally invasive surgery on immune function and stress response in gastric cancer patients.

Gastric cancer remains a leading cause of cancer-related mortality globally. Traditional open surgery for gastric cancer is often associated with significant morbidity and prolonged recovery. To evaluate the effectiveness of laparoscopic minimally invasive surgery as an alternative to traditional open surgery for gastric cancer, focusing on its potential to reduce trauma, accelerate recovery, and achieve comparable oncological outcomes. This study retrospectively analyzed 203 patients with gastric cancer who underwent surgery at the Shanghai Health Medical College Affiliated Chongming Hospital from January 2020 to December 2023. The patients were divided into two groups: Minimally invasive surgery group (n = 102), who underwent laparoscopic gastrectomy, and open surgery group (n = 101), who underwent traditional open gastrectomy. We compared surgical indicators (surgical incision size, intraoperative blood loss, surgical duration, and number of lymph nodes dissected), recovery parameters (time to first flatus, time to start eating, time to ambulation, and length of hospital stay), immune function (levels of IgA, IgG, and IgM), intestinal barrier function (levels of D-lactic acid and diamine oxidase), and stress response (levels of C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, and procalcitonin). The minimally invasive surgery group demonstrated significantly better outcomes in terms of surgical indicators, including smaller incisions, less blood loss, shorter surgery time, and more lymph nodes dissected (P < 0.05 for all). Recovery was also faster in the minimally invasive surgery group, with earlier return of bowel function, earlier initiation of diet, quicker mobilization, and shorter hospital stays (P < 0.05 for all). Furthermore, patients in the minimally invasive surgery group had better preserved immune function, superior intestinal barrier function, and a less pronounced stress response postoperatively (P < 0.05 for all). Laparoscopic minimally invasive surgery for gastric cancer not only provides superior surgical indicators and faster recovery but also offers advantages in preserving immune function, protecting intestinal barrier function, and mitigating the stress response compared to traditional open surgery. These findings support the broader adoption of laparoscopic techniques in the management of gastric cancer.

Early enteral nutrition (EEN) following intestinal anastomosis in pediatric patients – what’s new?

Abstract Introduction Abdominal surgery in children may disrupt normal gut function, necessitating prolonged fasting, which can lead to complications such as dehydration and nutritional deficits. Early enteral nutrition (EEN) after surgical procedures can enhance wound healing, prevent malnutrition, and expedite recovery. Although concerns exist regarding the risk of complications associated with EEN, current evidence suggests that it is not linked to increased perioperative complications. Content This scoping review provides an overview of the role of EEN in pediatric abdominal surgery, exploring its benefits and risks within the context of recent literature from 2021 to 2024. A systematic literature search was conducted using the PubMed database in April 2024 and the identified studies were compared. The search revealed 586 results, wherefrom eight studies (three systematic reviews and five clinical studies) fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Five studies were added since 2021. Overall, EEN may reduce the length of hospital stay, time to full oral intake, and return of bowel function. It does not seem to increase the rate of anastomotic leakage. EEN is associated with lower rates of surgical site infections and wound dehiscence as well as fewer septic complications. One study showed an increase in nausea/vomiting and abdominal distension in the EEN group, which did not lead to further complications. Summary and Outlook Current evidence suggests that EEN after abdominal surgery in pediatric patients is not associated with a higher rate of complications. In fact, EEN seems to be beneficial and lead to improved patient outcomes and shorter hospital stays. Emphasis on patient and parent comfort, individualized feeding initiation based on clinical factors, and standardized postoperative feeding protocols are recommended to optimize outcomes in pediatric abdominal surgery.

Vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) right hemicolectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis for cecal cancer.

Vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) for colorectal cancer utilizes transvaginal access for bowel mobilization, vascular pedicle ligation, oncological resection, and bowel anastomosis, along with subsequent transvaginal natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE), reducing or eliminating the need for transabdominal access. In this report, we describe the technique of vNOTES right hemicolectomy for cecal cancer, with intracorporeal anastomosis and transvaginal NOSE, including a step-by-step operative video. The patient was a 59-year-old Chinese female (body mass index 32.0kg/m2) with a cT3N0M0 3 cm cecal adenocarcinoma. Posterior colpotomy was created with insertion of a dual-ring wound protector. vNOTES D2 right hemicolectomy witha fully stapled intracorporeal anastomosis was performed via a homemade transvaginal glove port, using extra-long rigid instruments. A 10 mm, 30° rigid laparoscope was used for operative visualization through a transumbilical port, without additional percutaneous trocars. Operative difficulties pertained to suboptimal instrument reach, lack of triangulation, and frequent clashing within the restricted access space. Surgical duration was 300min, with 50ml of blood loss. There was minimal postoperative pain. Return of bowel function occurred on postoperative day 2, with discharge from hospital on postoperative day 3. The patient resumed normal daily activities and regular diet by 1-week post-surgery. Self-reported cosmetic satisfaction score was excellent. No operative complications were observed at 2 months' follow-up. vNOTES right hemicolectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis is safe and feasible in highly selected colon cancer patients. Operators should be proficient in conventional laparoscopic colectomy and transvaginal NOSE. More experience with the vNOTES technique is required to ascertain best practices.

Laparoscopic intra-peritoneal onlay mesh plus versus robotic transabdominal pre-peritoneal for primary ventral hernias: Our technique and outcomes.

Intra-peritoneal onlay mesh repair (IPOM) still remains the most common approach for laparoscopic repair of small to medium sized hernias worldwide. In this study, we compare our early outcomes of an established procedure, i.e. laparoscopic IPOM plus to robotic transabdominal pre-peritoneal (rTAPP) for small to medium sized primary ventral hernia. To compare laparoscopic IPOM plus with rTAPP in terms of pain score, time to ambulate, hospital stay, time to return to work as well as the expenses. This is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data at our centre between July 2021 and June 2022. Operative time including docking time was recorded. Cost analysis was done in both set of patients. Pain scores were assessed using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at regular intervals for up to 3 months and then at the end of 1 year. Time to ambulate, return of bowel function and return to work were documented. Any complication or recurrence during the study period was recorded. Mean operative time for IPOM plus and rTAPP groups was 59.00 and 73.55 min, respectively. Mean pain score for IPOM at 6, 12 and 24 h was 7.35, 6.81 and 5.77, while for rTAPP, it was 4.73, 3 and 2.55, respectively. VAS scores at 1 week, 1 month and 3 month also showed similar trends. Mean time to ambulate in minutes for IPOM and rTAPP group was 357.69 and 223.64, respectively. Mean hospital stay in days for IPOM and rTAPP was 2.12 and 1.18, respectively. Mean time to return to work in days was 11.77 and 8.45 for IPOM and rTAPP groups, respectively. Expenditure wise, cost of TAPP was more and statistically significant, owing to the use of robotic platform. The mean overall cost of laparoscopic IPOM plus and rTAPP in rupees was 187,177.69 and 245,174.55, respectively. Robotic TAPP appears an excellent alternative to laparoscopic IPOM plus. Larger studies with long-term follow-up data are further required to reinforce it.

Modified enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in octogenarians undergoing minimally invasive colorectal cancer surgery.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a major health issue worldwide. As the population ages, more older patients including octogenarians will require CRC treatment. However, this vulnerable group has decreased functional reserves and increased surgical risks. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways aim to reduce surgical stress and complications, but concerns remain about applying ERAS protocols to older patients. We assessed whether a modified ERAS (mERAS) protocol combined would improve outcomes in octogenarian CRC patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery. In this retrospective cohort study, we compared 360 non-octogenarians aged 50-64 years and 114 octogenarians aged 80-89 years before and after mERAS protocol implementation. Outcomes including postoperative functionary recovery, length of stay, complications, emergency department visits, and readmissions were analyzed. Despite comparable tumor characteristics, octogenarians had poorer nutrition, American Society of Anesthesiologists status, and more comorbidities. After mERAS, octogenarians had reduced complications, faster return of bowel function, and shorter postoperative length of stay, similar to non-octogenarians. mERAS implementation improved recovery in both groups without increasing emergency department visits or readmissions. Although less remarkable than in non-octogenarians, mERAS protocols mitigated higher complication rates and improved recovery in octogenarians after minimally invasive surgery for CRC, confirming protocol feasibility and safety in this vulnerable population.

Pre-operative carbohydrate drink in pediatric spine fusion: randomized control trial.

As rapid discharge protocols for pediatric spine fusion shorten stays, gastrointestinal (GI) complications are uncovered and cause delays in discharge. A pre-operative carbohydrate (CHO) drink has been shown to improve perioperative GI symptoms and functional return but has not been examined in pediatric spine patients. We aimed to determine if a preoperative CHO drink is safe in pediatric spine fusion patients, and if it improves their comfort scores and return of bowel function. We prospectively randomized ASA-1 and -2 pediatric spine fusion patients to either a pre-anesthesia carbohydrate drink 2h prior to surgery or to a control group (standard 8h NPO), blinded to surgical team. We documented time to return to flatus, bowel movement, GI symptoms, and comfort scores for 72h post-operatively or until discharge. 62 patients were randomized. There was no significant differences between the groups' pre-operative characteristics, surgical details, nor post-operative morphine dose equivalents, except for EBL (405cc control, 340cc CHO drink, p = 0.044). There were no perioperative complications related to ingestion of the CHO drink. CHO group had a positive trend for earlier return of flatus (21% vs. 3% return at 12h), and comfort scores for anxiety and abdominal pain, but no statistically significant differences. There was no difference in length of stay or time to first bowel movement. There were no complications related to ingestion of a CHO drink 2h prior to pediatric spinal fusion surgery. Further studies are needed to develop a study blinded to the participants with larger sample size. Level of evidenceI.

It's complicated: The relationship of non-narcotic medications and postoperative opioid use in radical cystectomy patients

IntroductionThe effect of individual non-narcotic analgesics in cystectomy enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is unknown. Additionally, many non-narcotic medications are associated with side effects pertinent to the cystectomy population. To better understand the actual use and utility of these medications, we sought to characterize the association between non-narcotic medications and milligram morphine equivalent (MME) narcotic score during the postoperative inpatient stay. MethodsWe reviewed 260 consecutive ERAS cystectomy patients. The MME impact of non-narcotic compliance and cumulative dose of medication received was evaluated separately with general linear models. We also assessed relationship of non-narcotic compliance to patient reported pain score, length of stay (LOS), and time to return of bowel function (ROBF) and performed manual review of postoperative documentation to identify reasons for medication noncompliance. ResultsCompliance with postoperative acetaminophen, gabapentin, and ketorolac was low. There was an inverse relationship between ketorolac dose and MME on postoperative day 1 (−0.026 MME/mg; P = 0.004) and postoperative day 2 (−0.33 MME/mg; P < 0.001). Compliance with ketorolac was associated with lower MME on postoperative day 1 (26.1 MME v. 33.6 MME; P = 0.023). There were no such associations identified with gabapentin or acetaminophen. Gabapentin compliance was associated with earlier ROBF (3.7 days v. 4.3 days; P = 0.006). Ketorolac compliance was associated with lower pain score on POD1 (3.25 VAS v. 4.07 VAS; P = 0.019) and POD2 (3.05 VAS v. 3.85 VAS; P = 0.040) There was no association between medication compliance and LOS. The most common reasons identified for non-compliance with gabapentin and ketorolac were renal function concerns (38% and 40% respectively), bleeding concerns with ketorolac (20%) and concerns for neurologic adverse effect with gabapentin (16%). ConclusionCompliance with non-narcotic medications in our ERAS cystectomy protocol was poor. There was a modest association with ketorolac and postoperative MME but no association with gabapentin or acetaminophen. Further study will clarify the role of these medications for cystectomy patients. Component specific analysis of protocolized care is valuable and may alter care pathways.

Single-Center Experiences: A Comparison of Intracorporeal and Extracorporeal Anastomosis Outcomes in Right Hemicolectomy.

Background Anastomosis formed in minimally invasive laparoscopic right hemicolectomy (LRH) may be achieved intra-corporeally (ICA) or extra-corporeally (ECA). This study compared the return of bowel function and other associated early patient outcomes and morbidity rates after an ICA or ECA in LRH. Methodology The study conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study of elective LRH from January 2021 to September 2023. Patient demographics, surgical techniques, and outcomes were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 29.0 (IBM Corp.,Armonk, NY). Results Ninety participants underwent LRH, and the anastomotic type was evenly distributed - with male patients comprising 53 (58.9%) of the total. The mean age was 64 (standard deviation [SD] ±16.8) years, and the median body mass index (BMI) was 27.0 (interquartile range [IQR] = 7.8). The mean follow-up period was 5.1 (SD ± 6.0) months. Univariate analysis showed that ICA had a shorter time for return of bowel function (P < 0.01). Additionally, ICA was associated with lower pain scores (P < 0.01), low morbidity (P = 0.02), and shorter hospital stays (P = 0.01). When comparing ICA to ECA, no significant difference was observed for procedure duration (P = 0.13), anastomotic leak (AL,P = 1.00), surgical-site infections (P = 0.36), lymph node yield (P = 0.26), and any-cause mortality. Multivariate logistic regression, controlling for statistically insignificant confounding factors, revealed that ECA was significantly and independently associated with increased time to first flatus (odds ratio [OR] 2.3, P = 0.01) and higher average postoperative pain (OR 1.5, P = 0.02) compared to ICA. Conclusions This single-center experience showed that ICA is associated with a quicker return to normal bowel function and low morbidity outcomes. ICA participants were positively associated with clinically relevant and health economics outcomes of shorter hospital stays without significantly adding to the procedure's duration times or compromising principles of oncological resection yield.

Résultats fonctionnels à court terme de la cystectomie avec dérivation urinaire non continente par laparoscopie robot assistée dans le cadre de troubles du bas appareil urinaire : une étude rétrospective monocentrique

ObjectiveTo assess the short-term functional outcomes and morbidity of robotic-assisted cystectomy (RAC) and intracorporeal urinary diversion (ICUD) in patients with lower urinary tract dysfunction (LUTD). MethodsAll consecutive patients who underwent RAC+ICUD for LUTD in a tertiary hospital center, between July 2018 and May 2021 were retrospectively included. Medical records were systematically reviewed and patient, perioperative and postoperative data were collected. A good short-term functional outcome was defined by the combination of a satisfying urostomy equipment (absence of urine leakage and easy appliance of the urostomy bag), the absence of pelvicaliceal system dilatation on sonography, and the absence of renal function decrease at the 2months post-operative consultation. Intraoperative parameters and post-operative complications were collected to assess morbidity. ResultsThirty-five patients were included. Eight (22.8%) patients needed intraoperative conversion to laparotomy. Twenty-five patients (92,5%) met criteria for a good functional outcome 2months post-operatively. The median operative time was 346min (86.5–407.5). The median blood loss was 100mL (100–290) and 5 patients (18.5%) required blood transfusion. The median times to return of bowel function was 3 days (2–4) and the median length of hospital stay was 10 days (10–18). Peri-operative complications were reported in 16 patients (59.2%): 6 (22.2%) minor complications Clavien ≤ II and 10 (37%) major complications Clavien ≥ III. There was no significative decrease of the renal function (mean preoperative creatininemia of 61.2μmol/L (50.5–74.5) vs 64.5μmol/L (47–85.25) postoperatively) ConclusionRAC+ICUD in LUTD can provide good short-term functional outcomes while limiting blood transfusion, time to return of bowel function and the length of hospital stay. These results should be confirmed by larger prospective study. Level of evidence4

Postoperative Outcomes and Analgesic Requirements of Single-Port vs Multiport Robotic-Assisted Radical Cystectomy.

Objective: To compare outcomes in patients undergoing robotic-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) with urinary diversion for bladder cancer with either the single-port (SP) or multiport (MP) robotic platform. Methods: All patients who underwent SP and MP RARC at our institution between January 2018 and January 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. Postoperative analgesia was administered by a departmentwide narcotic stewardship protocol, and inpatient and outpatient narcotic use was tracked. The available preoperative clinical, operative, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed using t-test, chi-square, and Fischer exact statistical measures. Kaplan-Meier analysis with log-rank testing was used to determine the freedom from high-grade (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥3) postoperative complications stratified by SP or MP robotic use. Results: Overall, 96 patients underwent RARC with urinary diversion at our institution, with 49 MP and 47 SP procedures performed. Preoperative clinical parameters including age, body mass index, prior abdominal surgery, and use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy were similar between the two groups. Patients undergoing SP RARC had a shorter operative time (386.0 ± 90.9 minutes vs 453.6 ± 94.8 minutes, p < 0.01) and faster return of bowel function (3.4 ± 1.4 days vs 4.5 ± 2.2 days, p < 0.01). However, both cohorts had similar length of hospitalization, postoperative narcotic use, pathologic staging, and rate of positive surgical margin. Within 3 months postoperatively, both cohorts had a similar high-grade complication, hospital readmission, and cancer recurrence rate. Conclusions: The SP robot allows a safe alternative surgical approach for RARC and offers similar postoperative outcomes compared to the MP robot.

Laparoscopic necrosectomy for acute necrotising pancreatitis: Retrospective analysis of a decade-long experience from a tertiary centre.

The objective of this study is to evaluate the role of minimally invasive surgery for the management of necrotising pancreatitis in acute settings and to propose tailor-made approaches to deal with various locations of pancreatic necrosis. Three hundred and thirteen patients underwent laparoscopic management of necrotising pancreatitis in this study period from January 2010 to June 2021, out of which 122 patients underwent minimally invasive necrosectomy for acute necrotising pancreatitis. The remaining 191 patients underwent laparoscopic internal drainage in the form of cystogastrostomy/cystojejunostomy for walled-off pancreatic necrosis. Mean body mass index was 26.45 ± 3.78 kg/sqm. Mean operating time was 56.40 ± 20.48 min and mean blood loss was 120 ± 31.45 mL. Ten patients required reoperation (6 underwent open procedure and 4 underwent laparoscopic redo necrosectomy). Six patients died of multi-organ failure. The mean duration of return of bowel function was 5 ± 1.8 days. The mean length of hospital stay after surgery was 10.19 ± 7.09 days. There were no major wound-related complications. A minimally invasive approach to pancreatic necrosectomy is safe and feasible with good outcomes in centres with advanced laparoscopic expertise. It requires not only careful case selection but also proper timing and the ideal route of access to achieve optimal outcomes.

Prucalopride and Bowel Function Post Gastrointestinal Surgery: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Prolonged postoperative ileus (PPOI) contributes to morbidity and prolonged hospitalization. Prucalopride, a selective 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor agonist, may enhance bowel motility. This review assesses whether the perioperative use of prucalopride compared to placebo is associated with accelerated return of bowel function post gastrointestinal (GI) surgery. OVID, CENTRAL, and EMBASE were searched as of January 2024 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing prucalopride and placebo for prevention of PPOI in adult patients undergoing GI surgery. The primary outcomes were time to stool, time to flatus, and time to oral tolerance. The secondary outcomes were incidence of PPOI, length of stay (LOS), postoperative complications, adverse events, and overall costs. The Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized trials and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations framework were used. An inverse variance random effects model was used. From 174 citations, 3 RCTs with 139 patients in each treatment group were included. Patients underwent a variety of GI surgeries. Patients treated with prucalopride had a decreased time to stool (mean difference 36.82 hours, 95% CI 59.4 to 14.24 hours lower, I2 = 62%, low certainty evidence). Other outcomes were not statistically significantly different (very low certainty evidence). Postoperative complications and adverse events could not be meta-analyzed due to heterogeneity; yet individual studies suggested no significant differences (very low certainty evidence). Current RCT evidence suggests that prucalopride may enhance postoperative return of bowel function. Larger RCTs assessing patient important outcomes and associated costs are needed before routine use of this agent.