Retroversion Index Research Articles

WHAT IS THE CONTEMPORARY MANAGEMENT OF ACETABULAR RETROVERSION?

Acetabular retroversion (ARV) is a cause of femoroacetabular impingement leading to hip pain and reduced range of motion. We aimed to describe the radiological criteria used for diagnosing ARV in the literature and report on the outcomes of periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) and hip arthroscopy (HA) in its management.A systematic review using PRISMA guidelines was conducted on the MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, COCHRANE database in December 2022. English-language studies reporting outcomes of PAO, or open or arthroscopic interventions for ARV were included.From an initial 4203 studies, 21 non-randomised studies met the inclusion criteria.Eleven studies evaluated HA for ARV, with average follow-up ranging from 1 to 5 years, for a cumulative number of 996 patients. Only 3/11 studies identified ARV using AP standardized pelvic radiographs. The most frequent signs describing ARV identified were: Ischial Spine Sign (98% of patients), Posterior Wall Sign (PWS, 94%) and Crossover Sign (COS, 64%); with mean Acetabular Retroversion Index (ARI) ranging from 33% to 35%. 39% of HA patients had all three radiographic signs. Clinically significant outcomes were reached by 33–78% of patients.Eight studies evaluated PAO for ARV, with a follow-up ranging from 2 to 10 years, for a cumulative number of 379 patients. Five of the eight studies identified ARV using standardized radiographs. ISS, COS and PWS were positive in 54%, 97% and 81% of patients, respectively with 52% of PAO patients having all three radiographic signs. Mean ARI ranged from 36–41%. Clinically significant results were reported in 71%–78% of patients.The diagnostic criteria for ARV is poorly defined in the literature, and the quality of evidence is low. Studies on HA are more likely to have used lenient diagnostic criteria. It remains difficult to recommend which cases maybe more suitable for treatment by HA rather than PAO.

Retrotilt of the Pelvis During Periacetabular Osteotomy: How to Avoid a Systematic Error Resulting in Acetabular Retroversion and Possible Femoroacetabular Impingement

Background: Pelvic tilt directly influences acetabular version on radiographs. Changes of pelvic tilt potentially affect acetabular reorientation after periacetabular osteotomy (PAO). Purpose: (1) To compare the ratio of the pubic symphysis height to the sacroiliac width (PS-SI) between hips with dysplasia and acetabular retroversion, uni- and bilateral PAO, and male and female patients. (2) To evaluate pelvic tilt (quantified using the PS-SI ratio) in patients after PAO by tracking it from preoperative to intra- and postoperative and short- and middle-term follow-up. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A retrospective and radiographic study was conducted evaluating pelvic tilt in 124 patients (139 hips) with dysplasia and 46 patients (57 hips) with acetabular retroversion who were undergoing PAO (January 2005–December 2019). Patients were excluded if they had insufficient radiographic data, previous or concomitant hip surgery, posttraumatic or pediatric deformities, or combined dysplasia and retroversion (90 patients, 95 hips). Dysplasia was defined as a lateral center-edge angle <23°; retroversion was defined by simultaneous appearance of a retroversion index 30% and positive ischial spine and posterior wall signs. Anteroposterior pelvic radiographs were taken in the supine position preoperatively, during PAO, postoperatively, and at short- and middle-term follow-up (mean ± SD [range]; 9 ± 3 weeks [5-23 weeks] and 21 ± 21 weeks [6-125 months]). The PS-SI ratio was calculated at 5 observation periods (preoperatively to middle-term follow-up) for different subgroups (dysplasia vs retroversion, uni- vs bilateral surgery, male vs female) and validated with intra- and interobserver agreement (intraclass correlation coefficients, 0.984 (95%CI, 0.976-0.989) and 0.991 (95% CI, 0.987-0.994), respectively). Results: The PS-SI ratio differed between dysplasia and retroversion at all observation periods (P = .041 to P < .001). Male dysplastic hips had a lower PS-SI ratio when compared with female dysplastic hips at all observation periods (P < .001 to P = .005). In hips with acetabular retroversion, the PS-SI ratio was lower in men than women at short- and middle-term follow-up (P = .024 and .003). No difference was found between uni- and bilateral surgery (P = .306 to P = .905) except for short-term follow-up in dysplasia (P = .040). The PS-SI ratio decreased in all subgroups preoperatively to intra- or postoperatively (P < .001 to P = .031). At short- and middle-term follow-up, the PS-SI ratio increased as compared with intraoperatively (P < .001 to P = .044) and did not differ from preoperatively in all subgroups (P = .370 to P = .795). Conclusion: A lower PS-SI ratio was found for male or dysplastic hips. In all subgroups, the PS-SI ratio decreased during surgery, indicating retrotilt of the pelvis. Correct pelvic orientation during surgery is crucial for accurate acetabular reorientation. Retrotilt during surgery results in underestimation of acetabular version and iatrogenic retroversion of the acetabulum at follow-up, with the pelvis in the correct and more forward-tilted orientation. Not taking into account retrotilt during PAO potentially results in femoroacetabular impingement. Therefore, we changed our intraoperative setting with adjustment of the central beam to compensate for retrotilt of the pelvis.

Ten-year outcome following surgical treatment of femoroacetabular impingement

The primary aim of this study was to determine the ten-year outcome following surgical treatment for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). We assessed whether the evolution of practice from open to arthroscopic techniques influenced outcomes and tested whether any patient, radiological, or surgical factors were associated with outcome. Prospectively collected data of a consecutive single-surgeon cohort, operated for FAI between January 2005 and January 2015, were retrospectively studied. The cohort comprised 393 hips (365 patients; 71% male (n = 278)), with a mean age of 34.5 years (SD 10.0). Over the study period, techniques evolved from open surgical dislocation (n = 94) to a combined arthroscopy-Hueter technique (HA + Hueter; n = 61) to a pure arthroscopic technique (HA; n = 238). Outcome measures of interest included modes of failures, complications, reoperation, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Demographic, radiological, and surgical factors were tested for possible association with outcome. At a mean follow-up of 7.5 years (SD 2.5), there were 43 failures in 38 hips (9.7%), with 35 hips (8.9%) having one failure mode, one hip (0.25%) having two failure modes, and two hips (0.5%) having three failure modes. The five- and ten-year hip joint preservation rates were 94.1% (SD 1.2%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 91.8 to 96.4) and 90.4% (SD 1.7%; 95% CI 87.1 to 93.7), respectively. Inferior survivorship was detected in the surgical dislocation group. Age at surgery, Tönnis grade, cartilage damage, and absence of rim-trimming were associated with improved preservation rates. Only Tönnis grade was an independent predictor of hip preservation. All PROMs improved postoperatively. Factors associated with improvement in PROMs included higher lateral centre-edge and α angles, and lower retroversion index and BMI. FAI surgery provides lasting improvement in function and a joint preservation rate of 90.4% at ten years. The evolution of practice was not associated with inferior outcome. Since degree of arthritis is the primary predictor of outcome, improved awareness and screening may lead to prompt intervention and better outcomes.Cite this article: Bone Jt Open2022;3(10):804-814.

Effects of degree of translation or rotation of acetabular fragment of periacetabular osteotomy procedure on pelvic X-ray parameters.

ABSTRACTThe present study aims to investigate the effect of amount of lateralization and/or anteversion of the point where the iliac cut meets with the posterior column cut of periacetabular osteotomy (PAO), on X-ray parameters such as Center of edge (CE) angle, retroversion index (RVI) and sharp angle. Fourteen patients with symptomatic hip dysplasia (CE° < 20°) were included. Pelvis Computerized tomography (CT) sections were used for 3D printing. PAO was then performed on these models. The point (A), 1 cm lateral to the pelvic brim, is marked where the iliac cut intersects the posterior column cut. In Group I (1.5–0), point A is lateralized parallel to the osteotomy line for 1.5 cm. In Group II (1.5–0.5), it is additionally anteverted for 0.5 cm. In Group III (3–0), point A is lateralized for 3 cm and then additionally anteverted for 1 cm (Group IV: 3–1). Radiographs were taken in each stage. The lateral CE angle, RVI and sharp angle were measured. All had an increase in the CE angle and RVI and a decrease in the sharp angle compared to the control group (P < 0.05). The amount of CE angle (ΔCE) or RVI increase (ΔRV) was as follows: 3–1(38°, 0.3) > 3–0(27°, 0.2) and 1.5–0.5(25°, 0.1) > 1.5–0(17°, 0.07) (P < 0.05) (with no difference between groups 1.5–0.5 and 3–0, P = 0.7). The amount of sharp angle decrease was as follows: 3–1(20°), 3–0(18°) < 1.5–0.5(11°) < 1.5–0(8°) (P < 0.05). The lateralization of the intersection point where the iliac wing cut meets with the posterior column cut along the cut surface led to an increase of lateral cover and focal retroversion. Additional anteversion leads to further increases in those parameters, while groups 1.5–0.5 and 3–0 did not differ between.

Diagnosis of acetabular retroversion: Three signs positive and increased retroversion index have higher specificity and higher diagnostic accuracy compared to isolated positive cross over sign

ObjectivesThe crossover-sign (COS) is a radiographic sign for diagnosis of acetabular-retroversion(AR) in patients with femoroacetabular-impingement (FAI) but overestimates AR. Three signs combined with retroversion-index (RI) could potentially improve diagnostic-accuracy. Aims(1)To calculate central acetabular-version (AV, CT/MRI) in patients with isolated positive COS and in patients with three radiographic signs for AR on radiographs (AP).(2)To calculate diagnostic performance of positive COS and of three signs combined with retroversion-index (RI) > 30% on radiographs (AP) to detect global AR (AV < 10°, CT/MRI). MethodsA retrospective, IRB-approved, controlled diagnostic study comparing radiographic signs for AR (AP radiographs) with MRI/CT-based measurement of central AV was performed. 462 symptomatic patients (538 hips) with FAI or hip-dysplasia were compared to control-group (48 hips). Three signs for AR(on radiographs) were analyzed: COS, posterior-wall-sign and ischial-spine-sign. RI (synonym cross-over-index) quantifies overlap of anterior and posterior wall in case of positive COS. Diagnostic performance for COS and for three signs positive combined with RI > 30% to detect central AV < 10° (global AR) was calculated. Results(1)Central AV was significantly (p < 0.001) decreased (13 ± 6°, CT/MRI) in patients with three signs positive for AR and RI > 30% on radiographs compared to patients with positive COS (18 ± 7°).(2)Sensitivity and specificity of three signs combined with RI > 30% on radiographs was 85% and 63% (87% and 23% for COS). Negative-predictive-value (NPV) was 94% (93% for COS) to rule out global AR (AV < 10°, CT/MRI). Diagnostic accuracy increased significantly (p < 0.001) from 31% (COS) to 68% using three signs. ConclusionImproved specificity and diagnostic accuracy for diagnosis of global AR can help to avoid misdiagnosis. Global AR can be ruled out with a probability of 94% (NPV) in the absence of three radiographic signs combined with retroversion-index < 30% (e.g. isolated COS positive).

Correlation between the range of rotation of the hip and the radiographic signs of cam and pincer morphology in femoroacetabular impingement syndrome.

ObjectiveTo determine whether hip rotation correlates with the radiographic signs of cam or pincer deformity after hip arthroscopy in patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome.Materials and MethodsThis was a single-center retrospective study of data collected between 2014 and 2017. The study sample included 65 patients between 18 and 55 years of age who underwent hip arthroscopy for the treatment of unilateral femoroacetabular impingement. The following data were collected for the periods prior to and six months after surgery range of medial and lateral rotation of the hip; measures on anteroposterior X-rays of the pelvis obtained in the standing position and on ateral X-rays in the Ducroquet profile view; and score on the 33-item International Hip Outcome Tool.ResultsMean preoperative and postoperative values were as follows: 19.26 ± 10.39° and 30.95 ± 3.52°, respectively, for medial rotation of the hip (p < 0.001); 73.85 ± 6.62° and 68.12 ± 5.04°, respectively, for the anteroposterior alpha angle (p < 0.001); 56.97 ± 6.09° and 50.61 ± 5.39°, respectively, for the lateral alpha angle (p < 0.001); and 0.17 ± 0.11 and 0.07 ± 0.08, respectively, for the acetabular retroversion index (p < 0.001). The crossover sign was identified in 75.4% of the patients before surgery and in 44.6% after (p < 0.001). Although there was an increase in the range of hip rotation and an improvement in radiographic parameters after arthroscopy, we detected no direct correlation between the two.ConclusionHip arthroscopy can improve medial rotation of the hip, as well as reducing cam and pincer deformities, in patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome. However, those findings do not appear to be directly correlated.

The variation in hip stability measurements between supine and standing radiographs of dysplastic hips.

The aims of this study were to compare clinically relevant measurements of hip dysplasia on radiographs taken in the supine and standing position, and to compare Hip2Norm software and Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS)-derived digital radiological measurements. Preoperative supine and standing radiographs of 36 consecutive patients (43 hips) who underwent periacetabular osteotomy surgery were retrospectively analyzed from a single-centre, two-surgeon cohort. Anterior coverage (AC), posterior coverage (PC), lateral centre-edge angle (LCEA), acetabular inclination (AI), sharp angle (SA), pelvic tilt (PT), retroversion index (RI), femoroepiphyseal acetabular roof (FEAR) index, femoroepiphyseal horizontal angle (FEHA), leg length discrepancy (LLD), and pelvic obliquity (PO) were analyzed using both Hip2Norm software and PACS-derived measurements where applicable. Analysis of supine and standing radiographs resulted in significant variation for measurements of PT (p < 0.001) and AC (p = 0.005). The variation in PT correlated with the variation in AC in a limited number of patients (R2 = 0.378; p = 0.012). The significant variation in PT and AC between supine and standing radiographs suggests that it may benefit surgeons to have both radiographs when planning surgical correction of hip dysplasia. We also recommend using PACS-derived measurements of AI and SA due to the poor interobserver error on Hip2Norm. Cite this article: Bone Joint J2021;103-B(11):1662-1668.

Morphological Changes of the Hip Commonly Associated With Femoroacetabular Impingement Are Not Correlated With Rotational Range of Hip Motion in Elite Soccer Athletes.

Morphological changes characteristic of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) are common in soccer players. However, the clinical relevance of such anatomical variations is still not well-defined. We hypothesized that high alpha angle values and/or acetabular retroversion index (ARI) are correlated with rotational range of motion (ROM) of the hip and that there are clinical-radiological diferences between the dominant lower limb (DLL) and nondominant lower limb (NDLL) in professional soccer players. Cross-sectional. Level 3. A total of 59 male professional soccer players (average age 25.5 years, range 18-38 years) were evaluated in the preseason. As main outcome measures, we evaluated the alpha angle and the ARI and hip IR and ER ROM with radiographic analysis. The measurements taken on DLL and NDLL were compared and a significant difference was found between the sides in the ER (P = 0.027), where the DLL measures were 1.54° (95% CI, 0.18-2.89) greater than the NDLL. There were no significant differences between the sides in the measures of IR (P > 0.99), total ROM (P = 0.07), alpha angle (P = 0.250), and ARI (P = 0.079). The correlations between the rotation measurements and the alpha angle in each limb were evaluated and the coefficient values showed no correlation; so also between the ARI and rotation measures. Morphological changes of the femur or acetabulum are not correlated with hip IR and ER ROM in male professional soccer players. ER on the dominant side was greater than on the nondominant side. There was no significant difference in the other measurements between sides. In clinical practice, it is common to attribute loss of hip rotational movement to the presence of FAI. This study shows that anatomical FAI may not have a very strong influence on available hip rotational movement in professional soccer athletes.

The Ischial Spine in Developmental Hip Dysplasia: Unraveling the Role of Acetabular Retroversion in Periacetabular Osteotomy.

Purpose Radiological diagnosis of acetabular retroversion (AR) is based on the presence of the crossover sign (COS), the posterior wall sign (PWS), and the prominence of the ischial spine sign (PRISS). The primary purpose of the study is to analyze the clinical significance of the PRISS in a sample of dysplastic hips requiring periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) and evaluate retroversion in symptomatic hip dysplasia. Methods In a previous paper, we reported the classic coxometric measurements of 178 patients with symptomatic hip dysplasia undergoing PAO where retroversion was noted in 42% of the cases and was not found to be a major factor in the appearance of symptoms. In the current study, we have added the retroversion signs PRISS and PWS to our analysis. Among the retroverted dysplastic hips, we studied the association of the PRISS with the hips requiring PAO. We also defined the ischial spine index (ISI) and studied its relationship to the coxometric measurements and AR. Results In hips with AR, the operated hips were significantly associated with the PRISS compared to the nonoperated ones (χ2 = 4.847). Additionally, the ISI was able to classify acetabular version (anteverted, neutral, and retroverted acetabula). A direct correlation between the ISI and the retroversion index (RI) was found, and the highest degree of retroversion was found when the 3 signs of acetabular retroversion were concomitantly present (RI = 33.6%). Conclusion The PRISS, a radiographic sign reflecting AR, was found to be significantly associated with dysplastic hips requiring PAO where AR was previously not considered a factor in the manifestation of symptoms and subsequent requirement for surgery. Moreover, the PRISS can also serve as an adequate radiographic sign for estimating acetabular version on pelvic radiographs.

Clinical and Radiographic Aspects of Patients with Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: Is There Difference between Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Hip?

Objective This paper aims to compare clinical and radiographic features of symptomatic and asymptomatic hips in patients with unilateral femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) and to establish a correlation between these findings. Methods This is a retrospective study, based on medical records of patients diagnosed with FAIS between January 2014 and April 2017. The patients were assessed clinically as per the International Hip Outcome Tool 33 (iHOT33) questionnaire, visual analogue pain scale, hip rotation, and hip and knee muscular strength. The radiographic evaluation consisted of measurements of the alpha angle, crossover signal, acetabular retroversion index, ischial spine signal, and posterior wall sign. Results A total of 45 patients were included in the study, with mean time from symptom onset to diagnosis of 28.6 months and mean iHOT33 score was 39.9. The mean medial rotation was 20.5° in symptomatic hip and 27.2° in asymptomatic hip ( p < 0.001). The crossover signal was positive on 68.9% of the symptomatic hips and 55.6% of the asymptomatic hips ( p = 0.03). The mean retroversion index was 0.15 in symptomatic hips and 0.11 in asymptomatic hips ( p = 0.02). There was a positive correlation between the total time of symptoms and medial hip rotation reduction ( p = 0.04) and between body mass index (BMI) and medial hip rotation reduction ( p = 0.02). Conclusion When comparing clinical and radiographic features, we observed reduction of medial rotation and increase of acetabular retroversion index in the symptomatic hip, as well as association between the long symptom time and the high BMI with loss of medial rotation of the hips.

Does acetabular coverage influence the clinical outcome of arthroscopically treated cam-type femoroacetabular impingement (FAI)?

What represents clinically significant acetabular undercoverage in patients with symptomatic cam-type femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) remains controversial. The aim of this study was to examine the influence of the degree of acetabular coverage on the functional outcome of patients treated arthroscopically for cam-type FAI. Between October 2005 and June 2016, 88 patients (97 hips) underwent arthroscopic cam resection and concomitant labral debridement and/or refixation. There were 57 male and 31 female patients with a mean age of 31.0 years (17.0 to 48.5) and a mean body mass index (BMI) of 25.4 kg/m2 (18.9 to 34.9). We used the Hip2Norm, an object-oriented-platform program, to perform 3D analysis of hip joint morphology using 2D anteroposterior pelvic radiographs. The lateral centre-edge angle, anterior coverage, posterior coverage, total femoral coverage, and alpha angle were measured for each hip. The presence or absence of crossover sign, posterior wall sign, and the value of acetabular retroversion index were identified automatically by Hip2Norm. Patient-reported outcome scores were collected preoperatively and at final follow-up with the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS). At a mean follow-up of 2.7 years (1 to 8, sd 1.6), all functional outcome scores significantly improved overall. Radiographically, only preoperative anterior coverage had a negative correlation with the improvement of the HOOS symptom subscale (r = -0.28, p = 0.005). No significant difference in relative change in HOOS subscale scores was found according to the presence or absence of radiographic signs of retroversion. Our study demonstrated the anterior coverage as an important modifier influencing the functional outcome of arthroscopically treated cam-type FAI. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:831-8.

Professional soccer is associated with radiographic cam and pincer hip morphology.

Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) syndrome is characterized by a triad: symptoms, clinical signs and imaging findings. Some individuals, especially athletes, have only imaging alterations. The objective of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of cam and pincer morphology in professional soccer players compared with a control group of non-athletes and to investigate the association between the age at which players start playing competitive soccer more than three times per week and duration of the soccer career with the prevalence of these radiographic findings. The prevalence of cam and pincer morphology in sixty professional adult male soccer players and thirty-two male controls was determined using pelvic anteroposterior radiography. Data were recorded for all hips and correlated with the age at which the players started competitive soccer practice and with the duration of their soccer career. The prevalence of morphological FAI in the soccer players was 92.5% versus 28.1% in the controls (p < 0.001). The duration of the soccer career was positively correlated with the alpha angle (p = 0.033) and negatively correlated with the retroversion index (p = 0.009). The age at which competitive play began was inversely correlated with the alpha angle (p < 0.001). The study showed a high prevalence of cam and pincer morphology in Brazilian professional soccer players compared with controls. The duration of the soccer career was associated with an increased alpha angle and a decreased retroversion index, and the age at which competitive soccer participation began was negatively associated with alpha angle values. Finally, this manuscript provides data about the association between greater exposure to soccer and cam and pincer morphological changes in the hip; specifically, cam morphology was more common in patients who began participating in sports at earlier ages. This information serves as an alert for coaches of youth teams to manage the training load in youth athletes. III.

Prevalência de sinais radiográficos de impacto femoroacetabular em indivíduos assintomáticos e não atletas

ObjectiveFemoroacetabular impact has been described as an anatomical variation of the proximal femur and/or acetabular border, causing impact on the hip joint. A portion of the population asymptomatic to the hip may present radiographic changes from femoroacetabular impact. The aim of the study was to evaluate the prevalence of these signs in asymptomatic and sedentary males. MethodsThis was a clinical, observational, primary, transverse, controlled study. Thirty‐two male volunteers aged 18‐40 years, asymptomatic in the hip, and sedentary, were selected from a university hospital's orthopedic emergency room. All patients underwent standard anteroposterior pelvic radiographs. Measurements of alpha angle, retroversion index, ischial spine signal, and posterior wall sign were analyzed. ResultsThe mean age was 29 years (18‐40). The prevalence of radiographic signs of AFI using an alpha angle of 67o was 53.1%; with an alpha angle of 82o, it was 31.2%. The mean alpha angle was 67o (52.4‐88.2o), with 35.9% of the hips classified as borderline and 6.3% as pathological. The mean alpha angle for the right side was 67.5o (52.5‐88.2o) and for the left, 66.6o (53.1‐86.9o). The mean retroversion index was 0.048 (right side, 0.044; left side, 0.052). The spine signal was positive in 15.6% and the posterior wall sign, in 20.3%. ConclusionThis study showed that the prevalence of radiographic signs in a population of asymptomatic and sedentary adult men was high (31.2%). New studies are required to clarify the actual clinical significance of this finding.

Labral augmentation with ligamentum capitis femoris: presentation of a new technique and preliminary results.

ABSTRACTPreservation of an intact labrum and reconstruction of a deficient or worn acetabular labrum are accepted techniques in modern hip surgery. If the remaining labrum is very thin, its intact tip can be preserved and its volume restored with a ligamentum teres graft. Technique and preliminary results of this augmentation technique are presented. Labral augmentation was performed in 16 hips (11 rights) in 16 patients (7 males, mean age 29 years) during surgical dislocation for treatment of femoroacetabular impingement. The acetabular index, lateral center edge angle, asphericity angle and acetabular retroversion index were determined on preoperative X-rays and magnetic resonance imaging. The pre- and postoperative Merle d’Aubigné and Postel score (MdA) was calculated and the Oxford Hip Score (OHS) obtained after 1 year. There were seven Grade 1 and nine Grade 0 hips (Tönnis classification). Mean lateral center edge was 29°. The mean acetabular index was 1.85°. Mean asphericity angle was 62.5°. Mean acetabular retroversion index was 23.4%. Mean MdA improved from 14.5 preoperatively to 17 at 1 year (P < 0.0001). Mean OHS after 1 year was 42. Previous surgery was a risk factor for inferior results: OHS was 44.5 in hips without versus 26 in hips with previous surgery. Mean MdA improved from 15 to 17.5 in patients without previous surgery versus 14 to 16 for the group with previous surgery. Augmentation of the labrum using ligamentum teres shows good clinical results after 1 year. Patients with previous hip surgery had inferior results.

Radiographic Diagnosis of Pincer-Type Femoroacetabular Impingement: A Systematic Review.

Background:Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is a well-recognized condition that causes hip pain and can lead to early osteoarthritis if not managed properly. With the increasing awareness and efficacy of operative treatments for pincer-type FAI, there is a need for consensus on the standardized radiographic diagnosis.Purpose:To perform a systematic review of the evidence regarding imaging modalities and radiographic signs for diagnosing pincer-type FAI.Study Design:Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.Methods:A literature review was performed in 2016 using the Cochrane, PubMed, and Embase search engines. All articles focusing on a radiographic diagnosis of pincer-type FAI were reviewed. Each of the included 44 articles was assigned the appropriate level of evidence, and the particular radiographic marker and/or type of imaging were also summarized.Results:There were 44 studies included in the final review. Most of the articles were level 4 evidence (26 articles), and there were 12 level 3 and 6 level 2 articles. The crossover sign was the most commonly used radiographic sign (27/44) followed by the lateral center-edge angle (22/44). Anteroposterior (AP) pelvis plain radiographs were the most commonly used imaging modality (33 studies). Poor-quality evidence exists in support of most currently used radiographic markers, including the crossover sign, lateral center-edge angle, posterior wall sign, ischial spine sign, coxa profunda, acetabular protrusion, and acetabular index. There is poor-quality conflicting evidence regarding the use of the herniation pit to diagnose pincer-type FAI. Some novel measurements, such as β-angle, acetabular roof ratio, and acetabular retroversion index, have been proposed, but they also lack support from the literature.Conclusion:No strong evidence exists to support a single best set of current radiographic markers for the diagnosis of pincer-type FAI, largely due to the lack of better quality trials (levels 1 and 2) that compare conventional radiographic findings with the gold standard, which is the intraoperative findings. More sophisticated imaging modalities such as computed tomography and magnetic resonance arthrography are often needed to diagnose pincer-type FAI, and these investigations are relatively accurate in assessing labral pathology or cartilage damage.

Intraoperative Evaluation of Acetabular Morphology in Hip Arthroscopy Comparing Standard Radiography Versus Fluoroscopy: A Cadaver Study

To compare quantitative measurements of acetabular morphology obtained using intraoperative fluoroscopy, to standardized anteroposterior (AP) pelvis radiographs. Ten dried human pelvis specimens (20 hips) were imaged using hip-centered fluoroscopy and standardized AP pelvis radiographs. Each hip was evaluated for acetabular version and coverage, including lateral center edge (LCE) angle, acetabular index (AI), total anterior and posterior coverage, and crossover sign. No statistically significant differences existed between the mean LCE angle (fluoroscopy 36.5° ± 8.3° v plain films 36.1° ± 7.9°, P= .59), acetabular index (0.6° ± 8.6° v 0.2° ± 7.1°, P= .61), ACM angle (44.0° ± 2.6° v 44.1° ± 3.8°, P= .89), Sharp's angle (31.8° ± 5.7° v 32.4° ± 3.9°, P= .44), and the total femoral coverage (80.9% ± 6.4% v 80.7% ± 7.5%, P= .83). Conversely, total anterior coverage (30.7% ± 8.5% v 33.3% ± 8.2%, P < .0001) appeared significantly decreased and the total posterior coverage (54.1% ± 6.9% v 49.1% ± 7.8%, P < .0001) appeared significantly increased in fluoroscopy compared with plain film radiographs. Fluoroscopy also failed to identify the presence of a crossover sign in 30% and underestimated the retroversion index (9% ± 16%, v 13% ± 16%, P= .016). The values for the LCE angle and AI determined by hip-centered fluoroscopy did not differ from those obtained by standardized AP plain film radiography. However, fluoroscopy leads to a more anteverted projection of the acetabulum with significantly decreased total anterior coverage, significantly increased total posterior coverage, and underestimated signs of retroversion compared with standardized AP pelvis radiography. This study shows reliable LCE and AI angles but significant differences in the projected anteversion of the acetabulum between standardized AP pelvis radiography and hip-centered fluoroscopy.

Is labral hypotrophy correlated with increased acetabular depth?

Labral hypertrophy is a distinct feature in hip dysplasia. Occasionally, very small, hypotrophic labra are observed. However, there is no literature concerning this pathology. We investigated if the size of the labrum correlated with any radiologic parameters reflecting the amount of acetabular coverage. It was hypothezised that there is a negative correlation between labrum size and acetabular coverage. Labra were categorized into three groups depending on the relation between length of the articular sided surface and height of bony attachment. Labra with a height:length ratio of 2 were classified as hypotrophic, with a height:length ratio of 1 as normal and with a ratio of 0.5 as hypertrophic. Labral cross-sectional areas (CSA) were measured on radial magnetic resonance imaging-arthrography slices using the measuring tool of the PACS system of 20 hips with hypotrophic labra (group 1), 20 hips with normal labral appearance (group 2) and 10 hips with hypertrophic labra (group 3). These values were then analyzed against following parameters: neck-shaft-angle (NSA), lateral center-edge angle (LCE), acetabular index (AI), femoral extrusion index (FEI) and acetabular retroversion index (ARI). Analyses of variance were used to determine differences in mean values between the three groups. Mean labral CSA differed significantly between all groups (group 1: 12.1 ± 2.9 mm2; group 2: 25.2 ± 6.2 mm2; group 3: 41.1 ± 12.3 mm2; P < 0.001). NSA, LCE, AI and FEI all showed a significant difference between group 3 and 1 or 2. The ARI showed no difference between groups. Stepwise linear regression analyses showed a significant correlation between LCE angle and labral CSA with a corrected R2-value of 0.301. Labral CSA correlates with the LCE. No statistically significant difference between groups 1 and 2 concerning the LCE, AI or FEI could be identified. Nevertheless, group 1 had the highest mean coverage of all groups, hips with hypertrophic labra the lowest.

Which radiographic hip parameters do not have to be corrected for pelvic rotation and tilt?

Acetabular anatomy on AP pelvic radiographs depends on pelvic orientation during radiograph acquisition. However, not all parameters may change to a clinically relevant degree with differences in pelvic orientation. This issue may influence the diagnosis of acetabular pathologies and planning of corrective acetabular surgery (reorientation or rim trimming). However, to this point, it has not been well characterized. We asked (1) which radiographic parameters change in a clinical setting when normalized to neutral pelvic orientation; (2) which parameters do not change in an experimental setting when the pelvis is experimentally rotated/tilted; and (3) which of these changes are "ultimately" relevant based on a prespecified definition of relevance. In a clinical setup, 11 hip parameters were evaluated in 101 patients (126 hips) by two observers and the interobserver difference was calculated. All parameters were normalized to an anatomically defined neutral pelvic orientation with the help of a lateral pelvic radiograph and specific software. Differences between nonnormalized and normalized values were calculated (effect of normalization). In an experimental setup involving 20 cadaver pelves (40 hips), the maximum range for each parameter was computed with the pelvis rotated (range, -12° to 12°) and tilted (range, -24° to 24°). "Ultimately" relevant changes existed if the effect of normalization exceeded the interobserver difference (eg, 37% versus 6% for prevalence of a positive crossover sign) and/or the maximum experimental range exceeded 1 SD of interobserver difference (eg, 27% versus 6% for anterior acetabular coverage). In the clinical setup, all parameters except the ACM angle and craniocaudal acetabular coverage changed when being normalized, eg, effect of normalization for lateral center-edge angle, acetabular index, and sharp angle ranged from -5° to 4° (p values < 0.029). In the experimental setup, five parameters showed no major changes, whereas six parameters did change (all p values < 0.001). Ultimately relevant changes were found for anteroposterior acetabular coverage, retroversion index, and prevalence of a positive crossover or posterior wall sign. Lateral center-edge angle, ACM angle, Sharp angle, acetabular and extrusion index, and craniocaudal acetabular coverage showed no relevant changes with varying pelvic orientation and can therefore be acquired independent from individual pelvic tilt and rotation in clinical practice. In contrast, anteroposterior acetabular coverage, crossover and posterior wall sign, and retroversion index call for specific efforts that address individual pelvic orientation such as computer-assisted evaluation of radiographs.

The relevance of the radiological signs of acetabular retroversion among patients with femoroacetabular impingement

Orthopaedic surgeons have accepted various radiological signs to be representative of acetabular retroversion, which is the main characteristic of focal over-coverage in patients with femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). Using a validated method for radiological analysis, we assessed the relevance of these signs to predict intra-articular lesions in 93 patients undergoing surgery for FAI. A logistic regression model to predict chondral damage showed that an acetabular retroversion index (ARI) > 20%, a derivative of the well-known cross-over sign, was an independent predictor (p = 0.036). However, ARI was less significant than the Tönnis classification (p = 0.019) and age (p = 0.031) in the same model. ARI was unable to discriminate between grades of chondral lesions, while the type of cam lesion (p = 0.004) and age (p = 0.047) were able to. Other widely recognised signs of acetabular retroversion, such as the ischial spine sign, the posterior wall sign or the cross-over sign were irrelevant according to our analysis. Regardless of its secondary predictive role, an ARI > 20% appears to be the most clinically relevant radiological sign of acetabular retroversion in symptomatic patients with FAI.

Reliability of Overcoverage Parameters With Varying Morphologic Pincer Features: Comparison of EOS® and Radiography

Multiple radiographic parameters used for diagnosis and quantification of morphologic pincer features have emerged, but the degree to which pelvic tilt or rotation affects conventional radiography and EOS(®) is unknown. We asked: (1) What is the reliability of EOS(®) and conventional radiography at increasing sizes of morphologic pincer features with varying degrees of tilt and rotation? (2) What is the effect of tilt and rotation on acetabular overcoverage measurements? Using a dry cadaveric pelvis, AP conventional radiographs and EOS(®) images were taken at intervals of increasing modeled pincer size with 0° to 15° varying tilt and rotation. Lateral center-edge angle, Sharp angle, Tönnis angle, crossover sign, and retroversion index were measured on all images. Statistical analysis was conducted. The intermodality intraclass correlation coefficients for conventional radiography and EOS(®) radiography across all pincer sizes, rotations, and tilts were excellent (0.93-0.98). Crossover sign was in perfect agreement in conventional radiography and EOS(®). Rotation of the hip away from the beam source and/or increased anterior tilt falsely increased all overcoverage parameters except for Tönnis angle. Rotation away from the beam of 10° or greater or anterior tilt of 5° or greater produced a false-positive crossover sign. EOS(®) radiography maintained excellent reliability in comparison to conventional radiography but both were equally vulnerable to the effects of tilt and rotation for quantification of hip parameters used in acetabular overcoverage assessment. A standardized pelvic radiograph ensuring that the pelvis is not excessively tilted or rotated should be used for assessing acetabular overcoverage parameters.