Retrospective ECG-gated Scan Research Articles

Application of prospective ECG-gated multiphase scanning for coronary CT in children with different heart rates.

To investigate the application of prospective ECG-gated multiphase scanning in coronary CT imaging in children with different heart rates. In the control group, 160 children aged 2-4 years who underwent a coronary CT examination in our hospital from May 2016 to December 2017 were retrospectively selected. They were divided into five subgroups according to their heart rate frequency: 75-85 beats/min, 86-95 beats/min, 96-105 beats/min, and 106-120 beats/min. There were 40 children in each subgroup. Each child was treated with retrospective ECG-gated scanning technology. Six groups of phase images were reconstructed: 40%, 45%, 50%, 70%, 75% and 80%. The optimal phase was selected for coronary artery reconstruction. In the study group, 240 children aged 2-4 years who underwent coronary artery CT examination in our hospital from January 2018 to May 2019 were prospectively selected and divided into five subgroups according to the heart rate frequency: 75-85 beats/min, 86-95 beats/min, 96-105 beats/min, and 106-120 beats/min. There were 60 children in each subgroup. A prospective ECG-gated multiphase scanning technique was used to reconstruct 70%, 75% and 80% phase images in the subgroups with heart rates < 85/min. In the remaining subgroups, 40%, 45% and 50% phase images were reconstructed, and the optimal phase was selected for coronary artery reconstruction. The scanning parameters, dosage of contrast medium and injection mode of contrast medium were the same in both groups. The radiation dose and image quality of the coronary artery were compared between the two groups at the same heart rate. When comparing the two groups at the same heart rate, the radiation dose in the study group was 72% lower than that in the control group (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in coronary artery image quality between the two groups at the optimal phase (P > 0.05). Applying prospective ECG-gated multiphase scanning technology to children's coronary CT imaging can significantly reduce the scanning radiation dose without affecting the quality of the coronary artery image.

Japanese Survey of Radiation Dose Associated With Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography - 2013 Data From a Multicenter Registry in Daily Practice.

Although coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) is frequently used for identifying coronary artery disease, no studies have investigated the radiation dose in detail in Japan. The aim of this study was to estimate the radiation dose of coronary CTA in Japanese clinical practice and to identify the independent predictors associated with radiation dose.Methods and Results:A multicenter, retrospective, observational study (54 institutions) was conducted for estimating the radiation dose of coronary CTA in 2,469 patients between January and December 2013. Independent predictors associated with radiation dose were investigated on linear regression analysis. Median dose-length product (DLP) was 809.0 mGy·cm (IQR, 350.0-1,368.8 mGy·cm), corresponding to an estimated radiation dose of 11 mSv. The DLP per site significantly differed between institutions (median DLP per site, 92-2,131 mGy·cm; P<0.05). Independent predictors associated with radiation dose on multivariable linear regression were body weight, heart rate, non-stable sinus rhythm, scan length, tube voltage setting, electrocardiogram (ECG)-gated scanning protocol, and the image reconstruction technique (P<0.05 each). The coronary CTA radiation dose was relatively high in 2013, and it varied significantly between institutions. Effective strategies for radiation dose reduction were low tube voltage ≤100 kVp, retrospective ECG-gated scanning with dose modulation technique, prospective ECG-gated scanning, and the iterative reconstruction technique.

Low dose dual-source CT angiography in infants with complex congenital heart disease: A randomized study

To investigate the radiation dose and image quality of prospective ECG-triggering dual-source CT angiography in infants with complex congenital heart disease (CHD) in comparison with retrospective ECG-gated scanning. Ninety-six infants less than 1 year old (60/36 male/female, age: 4.8 ± 2.7 months, weight: 5.8 ± 1.8 kg) with complex CHD were enrolled. Three image acquisition protocols were set: group 1: 80 kV, 100 mA, retrospective ECG-gated protocol; group 2: 80 kV, 100 mA, prospective ECG-triggering protocol with acquisition window of 380 ms; group 3: 80 kV, 100 mA, prospective ECG-triggering protocol with acquisition window of 200 ms. Patients were selected to any one of the protocols randomly. The signal-to-noise ratios (SNR) were calculated in the ascending aorta and the pulmonary artery trunk. Image quality was assessed by a five-point score. A score of <3 represents non-diagnostic. Effective radiation dose (ED) was calculated. Image quality score of groups 1, 2 and 3 were 4.1 ± 0.4, 4.0 ± 0.6 and 4.2 ± 0.6 (p = 0.224). SNR of ascending aorta and pulmonary artery trunk among them had no statistical difference (all p>0.05). The average ED (median) of groups 1, 2 and 3 were 1.17 ± 0.07 mSv (1.25 mSv), 0.72 ± 0.24 mSv (0.78 mSv) and 0.48 ± 0.41 mSv (0.39 mSv). Any two of the three groups had significant differences (all p<0.001). Prospective ECG-triggering DSCT angiography associated with a significantly lower ED than retrospective protocol, while maintaining image quality for diagnosis. Prospective ECG-triggering DSCT angiography could be used as a very important second-line diagnostic tool in infants with complex CHD.

Comparison of Diagnostic Accuracy and Radiation Dose Between Prospective Triggering and Retrospective Gated Coronary Angiography by Dual-Source Computed Tomography

The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the diagnostic accuracy and radiation dose of dual-source computed tomographic (DSCT) coronary angiography for assessment of coronary artery disease using prospective electrocardiographic triggering and retrospective electrocardiographically (ECG) gated spiral scans. One hundred sixteen patients who had undergone dual-source computed tomography and conventional coronary angiography were enrolled in this study. Fifty-four patients were scanned using retrospective ECG-gated protocols (group 1) and 62 patients using prospective ECG-triggered protocols (group 2). Diagnostic accuracy, image quality, and effective dose were compared between groups 1 and 2. Conventional coronary angiography was used as the reference standard. In total 1,709 (98.2%) coronary segments in the 116 patients were assessable with adequate image quality. Sensitivities and specificities of diagnosing coronary heart disease (≥50% stenosis) in a patient-based analysis of DSCT data were 93.3% and 88.9% in group 1 and 96.4% and 85.7% in group 2, respectively (p=0.973 and 0.761). In vessel-based analysis, sensitivities and specificities were 77.4% and 94.1% in group 1 and 79.6% and 92.3% in group 2 (p=0.983 and 0.985). Overall averaged image quality scores (using 1- to 4-point scale) in groups 1 and 2 were 3.3 ± 0.4 and 3.5 ± 0.9, respectively (p=0.268). Prevalence of good (score 3.0) and excellent (score 4.0) image qualities of coronary vessels were 95.4% in group 1 and 92.4% in group 2 (p = 0.861). Effective doses were 8.82 ± 3.50 mSv (range 3.92 to 15.36) in group 1 and 2.95 ± 1.39 mSv (range 0.99 to 6.06) in group 2 (p<0.001). In conclusion, DSCT prospective ECG-triggered coronary angiography has equivalent image quality and diagnostic value compared to that of retrospective ECG-gated scans. Radiation dose was significantly decreased using prospective electrocardiographic triggering.

Prospective versus retrospective ECG-gated multislice CT coronary angiography: A systematic review of radiation dose and diagnostic accuracy

To perform a systematic review of the radiation dose and diagnostic accuracy of prospective versus retrospective ECG-gated multislice CT coronary angiography. A search of Pubmed/Medline and Sciencedirect databases for English literature was performed to identify studies comparing prospective and retrospective ECG-gated multislice CT angiography in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Effective dose, dose length product, image quality and diagnostic value were compared between two groups of studies. 22 studies were included for analysis. The mean effective dose of prospective ECG-gated scans was 4.5 mSv (95% CI: 3.6, 5.3 mSv), which is significantly lower than that of retrospective scans, which is 13.8 mSv (95% CI: 11.5, 16.0 mSv) (p<0.001). The mean dose length product was 225 mGycm (95% CI: 188, 262 mGycm) and 822 mGycm (95% CI: 630, 1013 mGycm) for the prospective and retrospective ECG-gated scans, respectively, indicating a statistically significant difference between these two protocols (p<0.0001). The mean sensitivity and specificity of multislice CT angiography in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease was 97.7% (95% CI: 93.7%, 100%) and 92.1% (95% CI: 87.2%, 97%) for prospective ECG-gated scans; 95.2% (95% CI: 91%, 99.5%) and 94.4% (95% CI: 88.5%, 100%) for retrospective ECG-gated scans, respectively, with no significant difference for sensitivity but significant difference for specificity (p=0.047). Multislice CT coronary angiography with prospective ECG-gating leads to a significant reduction of radiation dose when compared to that of retrospective ECG-gating, while offering comparable image quality and diagnostic value.

Application of prospective electrocardiogram-gated dual-source CT in patients with acute chest pain

Objective To evaluate the application of prospective ECG-gated dual source CT (DSCT) in patients with acute chest pain, and compare it's image quality and radiation dose with those of retrospective ECG-gated spiral scan. Methods Thirty consecutive patients (Group A, average HR ≥85 bpm) with acute chest pain were scanned with prospective ECG-gated scan and another 30 consecutive patients (Group B, average HR ≥85 bpm)were analyzed by retrospective ECG-gated scan. Tube voltage and tube current were adapted by the BMI of patients. MPR, MIP, CPR and VR were used to display pulmonary arteries (PA), thoracic aorta and coronary arteries (CA). Image quality as well as radiation dose were assessed in 2 groups. Qualitative image quality was compared with chi-square test between the two groups,while quantitative image quality [the image noise ( IN ), signal-to-noise ratio ( SNR ) and contrast-to-noise ratio(CNR)] and radiation dose were evaluated with x2 test and Student's t test. Results The proportion of valid coronary segments for diagnosis were 379/385 ( 98. 44% ) and 390/396 ( 98.48% ) respectively in Group A and Group B with no significant difference(x2 =0. 002,P =0. 961 ). The IN [( 16. 23 ±5.75)vs ( 16. 31 ±3. 32) HU] ,SNR (26. 85 ±9. 94 vs 24. 78 ±9. 91 ) and CNR (20. 99 ±9. 31 vs 18. 65 ±8. 72)showed no significant differences between 2 groups ( t = 0. 069,0. 908 and 1. 224, P ＞ 0. 05, respectively).The ED was on average ( 8. 37 ± 2. 69 ) mSv in Group A, whereas on average ( 20. 05 ± 5.52 ) mSv in Group B. There was a statistical difference between 2 groups ( t = 9. 401, P = 0. 000). Conclusion Low dose prospective ECG-gated DSCT angiography can show similar image quality as retrospective ECG-gated spiral scan with radiation dose. Key words: Tomography, X-ray computed; Chest pain; Radiation dosage

Clinical application of prospective electrocardiogram-gated 320-detector computed tomography coronary angiography

to compare the success rate, radiation dose, image quality and diagnosis of prospective electrocardiogram(ECG)-gated 320-detector computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) versus retrospective ECG-gated CTCA. patients suspected coronary artery disease were divided into two groups which underwent 320-detector CTCA with prospective ECG-gated and retrospective ECG-gated scanning (n = 240 each, HR < 65 bpm). Curved-planar reconstruction (CPR), maximum intensity projection (MIP) and volume rendering (VR) were performed to demonstrate the coronary arteries. The image quality was defined as excellent, good and poor by motion and stair-step artifacts. Effective radiation exposure dose was estimated from the dose-length product. Effective radiation dose, image quality and diagnosis were evaluated. the success rate of examination was 100% in prospective ECG-gated group and retrospective ECG-gated group. The mean effective radiation dose of prospective ECG-gated CTCA [(3.3 ± 1.3) mSv] was significantly lower than that of retrospective ECG-gated CTCA [(13.0 ± 1.6) mSv, P < 0.01]. Segments of diagnostic image quality (95.42%, 3435/3600) and non-diagnostic coronary segments (4.58%, 165/3600) in prospective ECG-gated group were similar as those of retrospective ECG-gated group (95.81%, 3449/3600 and 4.19%, 151/3600, all P > 0.05). Compared with CAG, the sensitivity, specificity, false positive and false negative value in prospective ECG-gated group (93.22%, 99.21%, 91.64%, 99.05%) and retrospective ECG-gated group (94.55%, 98.80%, 95.86%, 98.54%) were not significantly different. though the effective radiation dose is significantly lower, the success rate, image quality and diagnosis of prospective ECG-gated 320-detector CTCA is comparable with that of retrospective ECG-gated 320-detector CTCA on patients with stable heart rates less than 65 bpm.

Is It Possible to Predict Heart Rate and Range during Enhanced Cardiac CT Scan from Previous Non-enhanced Cardiac CT?

The effect of heart rate and variation during cardiac computed tomography (CT) on the examination quality. The purpose of this study is to investigate whether it is possible to predict heart rate and range during enhanced cardiac computed CT scan from previous non-enhanced cardiac CT scan. Electrocardiograph (ECG) files from 112 patients on three types of cardiac 64-slice CT (non-enhanced, prospective ECG-triggered and retrospective ECG-gated enhanced scans) were recorded. The mean heart rate, range (defined as difference between maximal and minimal heart rates) and the range ratio (defined as maximal heart rate divided by minimal heart rate) during the scans were compared. Scan time was 4.8, 4.6, and 7.3 s on non-enhanced, prospective ECG-triggered and retrospective ECG-gated scans, respectively (p < 0.0001). The heart rates were not significantly different (60 ± 9 beats per minute (bpm), 60 ± 9 and 61 ± 10 bpm; p = 0.64). Heart rate on the enhanced scan markedly correlated with that of the non-enhanced scan (r = 0.78 and 0.74). In contrast, the ranges of heart rate were 2 ± 5, 4 ± 8, and 8 ± 21 bpm, with different range ratios (1.04, 1.07, and 1.14; p < 0.0001). Correlation of heart rate ranges between non-enhanced scan versus prospective ECG-triggered scan was low (r = 0.27) and that between non-enhanced scan versus retrospective ECG-gated scan negligible (r = -0.027).Heart rate on enhanced cardiac CT, in most cases, can be predicted from a non-enhanced scan. Heart rate range on enhanced cardiac CT, however, is hard to predict from the non-enhanced scan.

Dose reduction using prospective electrocardiograph-triggered axial coronary scan on the 64-slice spiral CT

Objective To compare radiation dose and image quality between prospective electrocardiograph(ECG)-triggered axial seau and retrospective ECG-gated helical scan in coronary 64-slice CT angiography(CTA).Methods Seventy-seven consecutive patients[group A.Average body mass index (BMI):24.6,heart rate＜70 bpm]underwent 64-slice CTA using prospective ECG-triggered axial scan protocol(120 kV,mA tailored to BMI).For each patient,the simulated radiation dose using retrospective ECG-gated scan protocol without ECG-driven X-ray current modulation technology was calculated and recorded at sanle kV and mA.Retrospective ECG-gated scan protocol was performed on 30 consecutive patients in another group(group B.Average BMI:23.9,heart rate＜70 bpm).The image quality was blindly evaluated between group A and B(paired t-test was used and P＜0.05 as a significant difference).Results There Was a significant difference(t=18.50,P＜0.01)between radiation dose of group A (3.37 mSv)and that of group B(18.13 mSv),decreased by 81.4%.The image quality of group A could fulfill clinical diagnostic needs.The average radiation dose of using simulated helical scan without optimization was 17.29 mSv,which wag similar to that of group B(18.13 mSv)(t=0.87,P＞0.05).Condusion Prospective ECG-triggered axial scan in 64-slice coronary CTA Call significantly reduce radiation exposure and the image quality can fulfill clinical diagnostic needs. Key words: Tomography,X-ray computed; Coronary vessels; Radiation dosage

Variability of Repeated Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring and Radiation Dose on 64- and 16-Slice Computed Tomography by Prospective Electrocardiographically-triggered Axial and Retrospective Electrocardiographically-gated Spiral Computed Tomography: A Phantom Study

We sought to compare coronary artery calcium (CAC) scores, the variability and radiation doses on 64- and 16-slice computed tomography (CT) scanners by both prospective electrocardiographically (ECG)-triggered and retrospective ECG-gated scans. Coronary artery models (n = 3) with different plaque CT densities (approximately 240 Hounsfield units [HU], approximately 600 HU, and approximately 1000 HU) of four sizes (1, 3, 5, and 10 mm in length) on a cardiac phantom were scanned three times in five heart rate sequences. The tube current-time products were set to almost the same on all four protocols (32.7 mAs for 64-slice prospective and retrospective scans, 33.3 mAs for 16-slice prospective and retrospective scans). Slice thickness was set to 2.5 mm to keep the radiation dose low. Overlapping reconstruction with a 1.25-mm increment was applied on the retrospective ECG-gated scan. The CAC scores were not different between the four protocols (one-factor analysis of variance: Agatston, P = .32; volume, P = .19; and mass, P = .09). Two-factor factorial analysis of variance test revealed that the interscan variability was different between protocols (P < .01) and scoring algorithms (P < .01). The average variability of Agatston/volume/mass scoring and effective doses were as follows: 64-slice prospective scan: 16%/15%/11% and 0.5 mSv; 64-slice retrospective scan: 11%/11%/8% and 3.7 mSv; 16-slice prospective scan: 20%/18%/13% and 0.6 mSv; and 16-slice retrospective scan: 16%/15%/11% and 2.9 to 3.5 mSv (depending on the pitch). Retrospective ECG-gated 64-slice CT showed the lowest variability. Prospective ECG-triggered 64-slice CT, with low radiation dose, shows low variability on CAC scoring comparable to retrospective ECG-gated 16-slice CT.

Radiation Dose, Image Quality, Stenosis Measurement, and CT Densitometry Using ECG-Triggered Coronary 64-MDCT Angiography: A Phantom Study

The purpose of this study was to compare prospective ECG-triggered and retrospective ECG-gated coronary 64-MDCT angiography as to radiation dose, image quality, accuracy of stenosis measurement, and CT densitometry. Coronary artery models (n = 3) with different plaque densities (approximately 50, approximately 110, and approximately 1,000 H) on a cardiac phantom were scanned in variable heart rate sequences (n = 14) with both prospective ECG-triggered and retrospective ECG-gated scanning. Radiation dose, image quality graded by motion and stairstep artifacts (grade 1, excellent, to grade 4, poor, with grades 1 and 2 defined as satisfactory), accuracy of stenosis measurement (area; 18%, 50%, and 82%), and CT densitometry of plaques (soft, approximately 50; and intermediate, approximately 110 H) were compared between the two protocols using the Mann-Whitney U test and repeated measures. The radiation dose of prospective ECG-triggered CT angiography (CTA) (3.0 mSv) was lower than that of retrospective ECG-gated CTA (11.7-13.0 mSv) when the same tube current (mA) and voltage (kVp) were used in both methods. Prospective ECG-triggered CTA images were assigned a satisfactory quality rating in stable heart rate up to 75 beats per minute (bpm) when using the minimal X-ray exposure time. In this range, there were no significant differences in stenosis measurement (p = 0.17) and CT densitometry (p = 0.93) between the two protocols. Prospective ECG-triggered coronary 64-MDCT has the potential to reduce radiation exposure while maintaining the diagnostic performance of retrospective ECG-gated coronary 64-MDCT.