Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy Research Articles

Oncologic Outcomes and Safety Assessment of Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy versus Open Partial Nephrectomy in Treating Patients with Localized Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Propensity Score Matching Study.

Surgical intervention is crucial in radical resection of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Different surgical procedures have different oncologic outcomes and safety in patients with RCC. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the oncologic outcomes and safety of retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (RLPN) versus open partial nephrectomy (OPN) in treating patients with localized RCC. This retrospective cohort study included 160 patients with localized RCC who underwent either OPN or RLPN from January 2016 to June 2020. Out of these patients, 75 patients were treated with OPN and 85 patients were treated with RLPN. After propensity score matching, 130 patients (65 cases in each group) were finally included in the analysis. Additionally, surgical outcomes, three-year survival rates, and renal function parameters were assessed between the two groups, and the data were statistically analyzed using SPSS. Compared to the OPN group, RLPN demonstrated significantly shorter surgical time, lower estimated blood loss (p < 0.05), and lower incidence of complications (p = 0.024). In contrast, the RLPN group had significantly longer warm ischemia time (p = 0.011) than the OPN group. Furthermore, there were no significant differences in three-year overall survival, disease-free survival, cancer specific survival rates, positive surgical margins, hospitalization time between the RLPN and OPN groups (p > 0.05). The incidence of complications in the RLPN group was significantly lower than that in the OPN group (p = 0.024). Postoperatively, creatinine level was significantly lower following RLPN at one year compared to OPN (p = 0.029). RLPN offers advantages in surgical time, estimated blood loss, and postoperative complications, and it positively affects postoperative renal function, while OPN shows a shorter warm ischemia time. These two approaches result in comparable three-year survival rates. This study provides valuable insights into the oncologic outcomes and safety of RLPN compared to OPN in treating localized RCC.

Comparison of Superselective Renal Artery Embolization versus Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy in Ruptured Hemorrhagic Renal Angiomyolipoma: A Single-Center Study.

To analyze the clinical efficacy of superselective renal artery embolization and retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for the treatment of ruptured hemorrhagic renal angiomyolipoma and to provide a reference for the selection of treatment methods for ruptured hemorrhagic renal angiomyolipoma. A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 24 patients who were diagnosed with ruptured hemorrhagic renal angiomyolipoma at the Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University between January 2019 and December 2021. Among them, 10 patients were treated with superselective arterial embolization (SAE), and 14 patients were treated with retroperitoneal laparoscopic part nephrectomy (RLPN). The differences between the two treatment methods in terms of hospital stay, hospital costs, anesthesia method, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative bed rest time, antibiotic dosage, postoperative complication rate, tumor diameter changes, creatinine value changes, hemoglobin value changes, tumor recurrence rate, and reoperation rate were compared. All patients completed the treatment and were discharged. There were no significant differences in length of hospital stay, hospital costs, creatinine change values, or postoperative complication rates between the two groups (p > 0.05). However, there were statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) in surgical time (85.50 ± 19.94 min vs. 141.07 ± 76.33 min), intraoperative blood loss (21.50 ± 14.72 mL vs. 153.57 ± 97.00 mL), postoperative bed rest time (22.7 ± 1.56 h vs. 41.21 ± 3.57 h), preoperative hemoglobin levels (94.7 ± 23.62 g/L vs. 113.79 ± 17.83 g/L), and hemoglobin changes (-6.60 ± 10.36 g/L vs. -15.21 ± 8.79 g/L) between the two groups. Both groups of patients had an average follow-up period of 22 months, and patients in the SAE group had a mean reduction of 3.33 cm in tumor diameter within the follow-up period compared with the pre-embolization period (p < 0.05). None of the patients in the SAE group experienced rebleeding, and there was no tumor recurrence in either group. SAE and RLPN are effective treatments for ruptured renal angiomyolipoma with good outcomes. Furthermore, compared to RLPN, SAE offers advantages such as simplicity of operation, minimal trauma, shorter surgical time, minimal impact on hemoglobin levels, shorter bed rest time, faster postoperative recovery, and maximal preservation of renal units.

Perioperative, Oncological, and Functional Outcomes after Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy in Elderly Patients: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.

Purpose: We aimed to assess the perioperative, oncological, and functional outcomes of patients aged 70 years or older following retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) and compare their results with younger patients. Materials and Methods: A retrospective review of our prospectively maintained database identified 329 patients who underwent retroperitoneal LPN from January 2013 to October 2022. The patients divided into 2 groups defined by age ≥70 or <70 years at the time of surgery. A propensity score matching analysis was conducted to obtain two balanced groups. The groups were compared for safety (perioperative outcomes) and efficacy (oncological and functional outcomes). Results: After matching, all variables were well balanced with no differences between the two cohorts. No significant differences were found in perioperative outcomes, including operative time, warm ischemia time, blood loss, hospital stay, and complications (P values >.05). Concerning functional outcomes, postoperative glomerular filtration rate and decrease in glomerular filtration rate were significantly better in the younger group compared with the elderly groups (P = .003 and P = .001, respectively). Although margin, ischemia, complications rates were similar between the cohorts (P = .068), Pentafecta rates were lower in the elderly patients (P = .029). In terms of oncological outcomes, recurrence-free survival and cancer-specific survival were comparable between the groups. Conclusion: Retroperitoneal LPN can be performed safely and with adequate oncological efficacy in elderly patients.

A novel mini-retractor for retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.

Retroperitoneal partial nephrectomy (RLPN) is the premier treatment for localized renal tumors despite narrow operation space. Many efforts have been taken to facilitate the operation of RLPN, but the optimal resolution remains debatable. To explore the feasibility of using Mini-lap to improve workspace and surgical vision in RLPN. A multicenter retrospective review of 51 patients who underwent RLPN with Mini-lap from January 2018 to December 2020 was conducted. Standard RLPN under three poles was performed in all cases. We highlighted the usage of Mini-lap (Teleflex Minilap percutaneous Surgical System) as a novel retractor in RLPN. Demographics, preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative outcomes were assessed. All 51 cases completed RLPN with three ports successfully and no conversion to open surgery. The mean diameter of tumors was (3.53 ± 1.05) cm, in which 62.7% (32/51) were located anteriorly. The operation time and warm ischemic time (WIT) were (86.7 ± 15.9) min and (25.6 ± 5) min respectively. Minor complications (Clavien grade 1-2) occurred in 6 cases. The limitations were small sample size, retrospective design, and absence of control. Mini-lap could be used as a mini-retractor in RLPN, sparing extra assistant ports, expanding workspace, and optimizing vision. With highlights of larger workspace and less instrument interference, mini-lap could be applied in retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.

Retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy with selective renal artery clamping for renal cell carcinoma: initial outcomes.

To explore the feasibility and safety of retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (RLPN) with selective artery clamp (SAC) in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC). The authors recruited three men and two women who underwent RLPN for T1 RCC between December 2022 and May 2023 at a tertiary hospital. The median age of the patients was 32 years (range, 25-70years). The tumour size ranged from 3 to 4.5cm. The R.E.N.A.L scores were 4x, 5p, 8a, 5a, and 8ah. The median preoperative eGFR was 96.9 (74.3-105.2). Renal computed tomography angiography was performed before the surgery to evaluate the artery branches. The operation time, number of clamped arteries, warm ischaemic time (WIT), intraoperative blood loss, RCC type, postoperative hospital stay, changes in renal function, and complications were evaluated. The follow-up duration was 6 months. The median operation time was 120 (75-150) minutes. One artery was clamped in four patients, while three were clamped in one patient. The median WIT was 22 (15-30) min, and the median blood loss was 150 (100-300) ml. No complications were recorded, and the resection margin was negative in all patients. The median decrease in eGFR was 6 (4-30%). RLPN with SAC for T1 RCC is safe and feasible in clinical practice.

Retraction: Evaluation of the safety of retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy by investigating the perioperative indicators.

[This retracts the article DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1138210.].

Transperitoneal vs. Retroperitoneal Approach in Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy for Posterior Renal Tumors: A Retrospective, Multi-Center, Comparative Study

Purpose: The aim of our study is to compare the perioperative, functional, and oncological outcomes of laparoscopic transperitoneal partial nephrectomy (LTPN) and laparoscopic retroperitoneal partial nephrectomy (LRPN) for posterior cT1 renal tumors. Methods: We retrospectively collected data on all patients who consecutively underwent LTPN and LRPN for posterior cT1 renal tumors in three different centers from January 2015 to January 2023. Patients with a single, unilateral, cT1 renal mass, located in the posterior renal surface were included. Patients’ data regarding perioperative, functional, and oncological outcomes were collected from medical records and statistically analyzed and compared. Results: A total of 128 patients was obtained, with 53 patients in the LPTN group and 75 patients in the LRPN group. Baseline characteristics were similar. Warm ischemia time (WIT) (18.8 vs. 22.6 min, p = 0.002) and immediate postoperative eGFR drop (−6.1 vs. −13.0 mL/min/1.73 m2, p = 0.047) were significantly lower in the LPTN group. Estimated blood loss (EBL) (100 vs. 150 mL, p = 0.043) was significantly lower in the LRPN group. All other perioperative and functional outcomes and complications were similar between the groups. The positive surgical margin (PSM) rate was lower in the LRPN group, although without statistical significance (7.2% vs. 13.5%, p = 0.258). Surgical success defined by Trifecta (WIT ≤ 25 min, no PSM, and no major postoperative complication) was similar between both approaches. Conclusions: LTPN has significantly shorter WIT and a significantly smaller drop in immediate eGFR when compared to LRPN for posterior renal tumors. On the other hand, LRPN has significantly less EBL than LTPN. LRPN demonstrated fewer PSMs than LTPN, albeit without statistical significance. In terms of overall surgical success, as defined by Trifecta, both approaches achieved similar results.

Enhancing Efficacy and Safety in Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy for Localized Renal Tuberculosis: The Skirted Continuous Suture Technique.

BACKGROUND Limited research has been conducted on laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for kidney tuberculosis. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the skirted continuous suture technique in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for localized renal tuberculosis. MATERIAL AND METHODS Five patients with kidney tuberculosis underwent standard retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy after computed tomography evaluation. The skirted continuous suture technique was utilized during the procedure. This retrospective study analyzed the outcomes of these patients who received treatment between January 2011 and December 2020 at Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital and Eighth Medical Center of Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital. RESULTS The surgical success rate was 100%. Renal function was well preserved, with a decrease of glomerular filtration rate by 9.6±9.0 ml/min. Only 1 patient experienced postoperative urinous infiltration and lymphatic fistula, while the others did not have any surgical complications. Antituberculous therapy was continued postoperatively, and 1 patient had recurrence during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS The laparoscopic continuous suturing technique offers a reliable and straightforward method for extensively closing incision edges of the renal parenchyma in laparoscopic surgery. It contributes to the improved efficacy and safety of treating localized renal tuberculosis with exceptional application.

Trans-retro-peritoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for posterior hilar tumor: technical feasibility and preliminary results.

Urologists still encounter challenges when it comes to the surgical management of tumors located on the posterior lip and posterior renal hilar region. We propose a trans-retro-peritoneal (TRP) technique to address the difficulties associated with posterior hilar tumors during retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN). Its efficacy was evaluated in a retrospective case-control study. The patients with posterior hilar tumors (≤7 cm) that underwent retroperitoneal LPN were included. The TRP technique allowed the posterior hilar tumor completely visible by incising the ventral peritoneum and rotating kidney ventrally during retroperitoneal LPN, which was applied in 36 cases, while the conventional retroperitoneal LPN was performed in 22 cases. Perioperative data were analyzed to evaluate the efficacy of TRP-LPN. In TRP-LPN group, the TRP technique was successfully performed in all the patients without converting to open surgery or radical nephrectomy. The warm ischemia time was significantly shorter in TRP-LPN group than conventional LPN group (20.3 vs. 28.5 min, P<0.001). Furthermore, the mean estimated blood loss in TRR-LPN group was significantly less than that in conventional LPN group (86.5 vs. 90.9 mL, P<0.05). The mean operation time and recovery time of gastrointestinal function were similar between two groups. No severe complications occurred, and no positive surgical margin was found. The rate of Trifecta achievement was 50.0% (18/36) and 31.8% (7/22) respectively for TRP-LPN and conventional LPN (P=0.175). After mean follow-up of 21 months, no recurrence or metastasis occurred in all cases. Our findings, as demonstrated by the Trifecta outcomes, support the feasibility and efficacy of TRP-LPN in managing posterior renal hilar tumors. This approach may be considered as an efficient option for surgical management of such tumors.

Is intraoperative ultrasonography necessary in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for exophytic tumours?

Introduction The value of IOUS has been proven especially for endophytic kidney tumours, but has not been assessed critically for exophytic kidney tumours. We aimed to evaluate the value of IOUS for exophytic kidney tumours. Material and methods The data of LPN cases were collected prospectively between 2000 and 2022. Thirty-two of 535 patients who underwent laparoscopic retroperitoneal partial nephrectomy without IOUS were matched with the IOUS applied cases according to tumour size, tumour localization and PADUA score. Results There were no differences between the two groups in terms of the matching parameters. The average warm ischemia time was 14 min for the IOUS group (range 9–32 min) and 20 min for the non-IOUS group (range 7–52 min) (p = 0.01). Also, the average cutting time was shorter in the IOUS group (6 min vs 9 min) (p = 0.046). There was no difference between the two groups in terms of suturing times (8 min vs 8.5 min) (p = 0.66). The average tumour size was 3.5 cm and pathologically-proven residual tumour was detected in one patient in each group. Conclusion The use of IOUS in laparoscopic retroperitoneal partial nephrectomy for exophytic kidney tumours may shorten the warm ischemia time by reducing the cutting time.

Renal mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma: a case report and literature review

Background: Renal MALT lymphoma is a rare entity with few reports in the literature. These neoplasms arise at extranodal sites, usually related with chronic inflammation due to infection or autoimmune disorder and share histologic and immunophenotypic features. To date, 10 cases of renal MALT lymphoma have been described. Case presentation: We present a case of a MALT renal lymphoma in a 69-year-old woman with suspected preoperative diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma (papillary vs chromophobe type), RENAL SCORE 9p. We performed a retroperitoneal laparoscopic left partial nephrectomy guided by intraoperative ultrasound. Conclusion: There are few reports in the literature regarding renal MALT lymphoma. We consider that this might be considered as a differential diagnosis of renal mass.

Application of three-dimensional reconstruction of renal tumor vessels to guide laparoscopic partial nephrectomy of hilar tumors and non-hilar tumors under zero ischemia

ObjectiveTo investigate the safety and efficacy of three-dimensional reconstruction of renal tumor vessels to guide laparoscopic partial nephrectomy of hilar tumors and non-hilar tumors under zero ischemia. MethodsThe clinical data of 82 patients with renal cancer who underwent zero ischemia retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in the department of urology of our hospital from January 2018 to January 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were divided into hilar group and non-hilar group. The clinical data of all patients were statistically analyzed by t-test or χ2. ResultsThere was no significantly difference in gender, age, tumor diameter and pathological stage between hilar and non-hilar tumor group. Most of the target vessels in the hilar tumor group were single targets, while most of the target vessels in the non-hilar tumor group were multiple targets (P<0.05). There was no significantly difference between the groups for mean operative time and length of stay. But hilar tumor group had significantly longer operation time (109.3 ± 9.2 vs. 90.3 ± 9.5 min, p<0.001). There was no significant difference in renal GFR and serum creatinine between the two groups. Hilar tumor group had no significantly difference of change of creatinine and GFR at post-operative 6 and 12 months as compared with non-hilar tumor group. There were no bleeding, urinary leakage, infection and other related complications in the two groups after 1 month follow-up. After 12 months of follow-up, there was no tumor recurrence and metastasis in the two groups. ConclusionThe application of three-dimensional renal tumor vascular reconstruction technology can better realize laparoscopic zero ischemia nephron sparing surgery. The target vessels of patients with hilar, single and early renal cancer are easier to find, which is more suitable for three-dimensional renal tumor vascular reconstruction technology to implement laparoscopic zero ischemia nephron sparing surgery.

Comparison of Posterior and Antero-Lateral Renal Tumors in Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.

This study aimed to compare the antero-lateral and posterior localized renal masses in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy with the retroperitoneal approach in terms of operative, functional, and oncological outcomes. Patients who underwent retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy by a single surgeon between January 2013 and January 2021 were included in the study. A one-to-one propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was conducted to obtain two balanced groups. The patients were divided into two groups as posterior and antero-lateral according to the localization of the mass. A total of 239 patients were included in the PSM analysis, with 65 patients allocated to each group. The mean operative time was 79.2 ± 11.2 min in the posterior group, while it was 90.0 ± 11.6 min in the antero-lateral group (P < 0.001). Warm ischemia time was 15.9 ± 2.4 min in the posterior group and 18.6 ± 2.7 min in the antero-lateral group (P < 0.001). The median decrease in eGFR at 1 year was 4.8 (IQR, 2.9-6.9) mL/min in the posterior group and 5.0 (IQR, 2.8-11) mL/min in the antero-lateral group (P = 0.219). The warm ischemia time and clamping technique were found to be significant factors for predicting eGFR change after surgery (β:0.693, 95% CI: 0.39-0.99, P < 0.001; β:6.43, 95% CI: 1.1-11.7, P = 0.017, respectively). We report that retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy provided longer warm -ischemia and operative time for antero-lateral renal masses than posterior masses. However, long-term oncological and functional results were similar for both localizations.

Evaluation of the safety of retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy by investigating the perioperative indicators.

In recent years, open nephron sparing partial nephrectomy (OPN) has been gradually applied and generally accepted. Recent statistical data show that PN not only can safely and effectively preserve the functional nephron, but also has fewer complications, low local recurrence rate and no significant difference in long-term survival rate compared with nephrectomy/radical nephrectomy, which has gradually become a routine treatment for small renal cell carcinoma. Therefore, how to maximize the protection of postoperative residual renal function (RRF) and reduce the risk of CKD while achieving the ideal local and overall tumor control effect is the key to the treatment of renal cancer, and is also the focus of attention of urologists and nephrologists. To evaluate the safety of retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (RLPN) by investigating the perioperative indicators and postoperative follow-up. A total of 40 hospitalized patients in our hospital from December 2019 to December 2021 were selected and followed up for a long time. Patients with renal tumors less than 4cm in diameter and exogeneous or partial exogeneity were randomly divided into 2 groups. Patients in retroperitoneal laparoscopic group (n = 20) were treated with nephron sparing partial nephrectomy (0.5-1cm). Twenty patients underwent retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (LRN).The time of removal of drainage tube, drainage volume, time of feeding activity and postoperative hospital stay were recorded, and the safety of the operation was evaluated. nephron sparing partial nephrectomy is suitable for patients with localized renal carcinoma or benign tumor <4cm. RLPN can be applied to all indications of open nephron sparing partial nephrectomy (OPN), with good safety, and can preserve residual renal function to the greatest extent. The operative vascular occlusion time was controlled within 40 minutes, and the use of renal function protection measures during the operation was safe and controllable in reducing the prevention of warm ischemic kidney damage, with good safety. The renal tumor capsule with 0.5cm~1cm margin was complete by postoperative pathology. In the process of tumor resection and suture collection system in the RLPN group, we improved the previous operation of "resection before hemostasis" to "resection while hemostasis" and "knot-free suture" technology, which saved the operation time of intracavity suture knotting. Reduced cortical tear caused by vertical pull during knot tying. The combined effect of biological clip and hemostatic gauze can stimulate the granulation proliferation of renal cortical wound and accelerate the repair. With the combination of knot-free suture and renal segment vascular occlusion, hot ischemic kidney damage is reduced. In the RLPN group, there were no complications of urinary fistula and bleeding, and no abnormal changes in renal function during follow-up. The safety of RLPN group is worthy of affirmation. The perioperative safety and short-term postoperative renal function recovery of RLPN are good, and the overall safety of this operation is worthy of affirmation.

Search for the optimized and key nephrometry elements combination in retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: A retrospective study.

The nephrometry scoring system plays a key role in the preoperative evaluation of partial nephrectomy, and scoring systems based on anatomical characteristics have high similarity in scoring elements. Currently, there is little research on scoring systems related to retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy, and there is a lack of research on the combination of scoring elements, which requires further investigation. We retrospectively analyzed the clinical records of 107 patients who underwent retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy conducted by a single operator at a single center. The score and scoring elements were generated based on imaging. The scoring elements of each scoring system and all combinations of two to five elements were extracted. The predictive ability of different score combinations was evaluated by AUC value, and the key parameters of the score were found by taking the intersection. A nomogram was constructed and evaluated. We observed that with an increase in scoring elements, the strongest combination of elements did not significantly increase the predictive ability of warm ischemia time (P>0.05), postoperative complications (P>0.05), and trifecta achievement (P>0.05). The combination of the maximum tumor diameter and the distance between tumor and collecting system or renal sinus had a good comprehensive predictive ability, and there is no significant difference with the traditional score (P>0.05). The nomogram generated according to this combination has an excellent prediction ability for predicting whether obtain trifecta of partial nephrectomy. Within the range of two to five elements, the critical degree of elements is more important than the number of elements. The maximum tumor diameter and the distance between the tumor and the collecting system or renal sinus was the key element of the prediction ability.

Surgical strategy of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: It is more suitable to use transperitoneal approach in anterior tumor patients and retroperitoneal approach in posterior tumor patients.

Previous surgical strategy of transperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (TLPN) and retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (RLPN) for treatment of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) mainly depend on surgeons' preference. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether performing TLPN for anterior tumors and RLPN for posterior tumors is a more beneficial strategy. 214 patients underwent TLPN or RLPN at our center were retrospectively collected and 1:1 matched for surgical approach, tumor complexity as well as operator. Baseline characteristics and perioperative outcomes were evaluated and compared, respectively. Regardless of tumor location, RLPN was associated with a faster operative time, a quicker time to first oral intake and hospital discharge compared to TLPN approach while other baseline and perioperative outcomes were comparable between groups. After taking tumor location into consideration, TLPN has an advantage in operating time (109.8 vs 115.3 mins, p = 0.03) and ischemic time (20.3 vs 24.1 mins, p = 0.001) for anterior tumor, while RLPN has an advantage in operating time (103.5 vs 116.3 mins, p<0.001), ischemic time (21.8 vs 24.8 mins, p=7 0.001) and estimated blood loss (65.5 vs 85.4ml, p = 0.01) for posterior tumor. The selection of approach should be also dependent of the tumor location, instead of only dependent of surgeons' experience or preference.

MP003 - Comparison of functional outcomes of On-clamp versus Off-clamp method in retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.

MP003 - Comparison of functional outcomes of On-clamp versus Off-clamp method in retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.

Lateroconal fascia suspension facilitates retroperitoneal partial nephrectomy.

BackgroundAs the development of various imaging techniques, the incidental detection of renal masses is increasing. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) is the current standard of treatment for renal carcinoma. Though the retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (RLPN) become the prior choice, the edge of lateroconal fascia blocks the sight and make operation more challenging.MethodsBetween October 2018 and December 2020, the clinical data of 28 cases diagnosed with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in our hospital was collected and analyzed retrospectively. All patients underwent RLPN and for management of curtain effect, we performed lateroconal fascia suspension (LFS) procedure in all cases with prepared Hem-o-lock clip which bound with 2-0 suture.ResultsRLPN for renal tumor was successfully performed in all cases with no conversions to open surgery and other interruptions. In all cases, the free edge of lateroconal fascia and peritoneum partially blocked the sight of surgeon. We managed the curtain effect successfully and got a satisfying field of view for subsequent surgical procedure. The median operation time was 142 [interquartile range (IQR), 110–164] min, median estimated blood loss was 93 (IQR, 50–100) mL. Median warm ischemia time was 29 (IQR, 22–30) min.ConclusionsLFS is useful for management of curtain effect. It is a simple, economical and less invasive technique and we can get better efficiency with little consumption.

MP004 - Is the intraoperative ultrasonography really necessary during laparoscopic retroperitoneal partial nephrectomy for exophytic kidney tumors?: A matched-pair analysis.

MP004 - Is the intraoperative ultrasonography really necessary during laparoscopic retroperitoneal partial nephrectomy for exophytic kidney tumors?: A matched-pair analysis.

Analysis of Clinical Characteristics, Radiological Predictors, Pathological Features, and Perioperative Outcomes Associated with Perinephric Fat Adhesion Degree.

Background To assess the clinical characteristics, radiological predictors, and pathological features of perinephric fat adhesion degree (PFAD) graded based on fixed criteria and to determine the impact of adherent perinephric fat (APF) on retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (RLPN) outcomes. Methods 84 patients undergoing RLPN were included and graded into 4 groups based on PFAD. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed for clinical characteristics and radiological predictors of PFAD. Perioperative data were compared between APF groups and non-APF groups. Masson staining determined collagen fibers. Immunohistochemistry detected CD45 immune cells and CD34 vessels. Results 20, 28, 18, and 18 patients were graded as normal perinephric fat (NPF), mild adherent perinephric fat (MiPF), moderate adherent perinephric fat (MoPF), and severe adherent perinephric fat (SPF), respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that gender (p < 0.001), age (p = 0.003), and hypertension (p = 0.006) were significant clinical risk factors of PFAD, while radiological predictors included perinephric stranding (p = 0.001), posterior perinephric fat thickness (p = 0.009), and perinephric fat density (p = 0.02). APF was associated with drain output (p = 0.012) and accompanied by immune cells gathering in renal cortex near thickened renal capsule with many vessels. Conclusions Clinical characteristics and radiological predictors can evaluate PFAD and may assist to guide preoperative surgical option. Pathological features of APF reflect decapsulation and bleeding during kidney mobilization at RLPN.