Resurfacing In Total Knee Arthroplasty Research Articles

Le resurfaçage patellaire d’un deuxième côté lors d’une prothèse totale de genou pourrait ne pas être nécessaire même s’il a été effectué du premier côté

Introduction: The appropriateness or necessity of patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is not clearly established. The objective of the present study was to compare the clinical and functional results of patients operated on one side by TKA with patellar resurfacing and on the other side by TKA without patellar resurfacing. The hypothesis was that there was no difference in results between the two sides.Method: This was a retrospective cohort of patients operated on by TKA without patellar resurfacing (TKA R-) in a second osteoarthritic knee after contralateral TKA with patellar resurfacing (TKA R+). Twenty consecutive patients who underwent second primary TKA constituted their own control group (40 knees). Iwano scores were comparable. Mean age was 75.9 ± 6.2 years. Mean time between the two procedures was 20.6 ± 11.9 months.Results: There were no differences in SF-36, KOOS or Lillois scores between the right and left knees. Sixty-five percent of patients were unable to differentiate the performance their knees in activities of daily living.Conclusion: The present study did not differentiate results according to patellar resurfacing, showing the limitations of resurfacing on early functional gain after primary TKA. Resurfacing might thus not be essential, even if it was performed in replacement of the first knee.Level of evidence: IV; retrospective cohort study

Patellar resurfacing might not be mandatory in contralateral second total knee replacement even if performed during replacement of the first knee

IntroductionThe appropriateness or necessity of patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is not clearly established. The objective of the present study was to compare the clinical and functional results of patients with bilateral involvement, operated on in one knee by TKA with patellar resurfacing and in the other knee by TKA without resurfacing. The hypothesis was that there was no difference in results between the two sides. MethodThis was a retrospective cohort of patients operated on by TKA without patellar resurfacing in a second osteoarthritic knee after contralateral TKA with patellar resurfacing. Twenty consecutive patients who underwent second primary TKA constituted their own control group (40 knees). Iwano scores were comparable. Mean age was 75.9±6.2years. Mean time between the two procedures was 20.6±11.9months. ResultsThere were no differences in SF-36, KOOS or Lille patellofemoral scores between the right and left knees. Sixty-five percent of patients were unable to differentiate the performance of their knees in activities of daily living. ConclusionThe present study did not differentiate results according to patellar resurfacing, showing the limitations of resurfacing for early functional gain after primary TKA. Resurfacing might thus not be essential, even if it was performed in replacement of the first knee. Level of evidenceIV; retrospective cohort study.

When to Do Selective Patellar Resurfacing in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Decision-Making Algorithm Based on Pre-operative and Intra-operative Findings.

Persistent anterior knee pain post total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a significant cause of patient dissatisfaction. Selective patellar resurfacing is commonly practiced for primary total knee replacement (TKR) but there is a paucity in literature regarding its decision making. This study aims to develop a decision-making algorithm for selective patellar resurfacing using Hospital for Special Surgery Patello-femoral Assessment score (HSS PFA score), weight-bearing patellofemoral X-ray, and intraoperative cartilage wear assessment based on the Outerbridge classification. This prospective study enrolled 65 patients, assessing preoperative factors including HSS PFA score and Baldini view radiography. Intraoperative cartilage wear was categorized using the Outerbridge classification. Preoperative findings were correlated with intraoperative outcomes through statistical analysis, leading to the development of a predictive algorithm. The efficiency of algorithm was assessed at 3-year follow-up using HSS PFA score. A significant negative correlation (r = -0.272, p = 0.029) was observed between HSS PFA score and cartilage wear. However, no significant relationships were established between HSS PFA score and Baldini view observations, including radiological tilt (p = 0.517) and displacement (p = 0.277). Intraoperative cartilage wear versus patellar tilt (p = 0.65) and displacement (p = 0.837) also yielded non-significant results. Three-year follow-up examinations revealed no complications and significant HSS PFA score improvements in all patients. The requirement for patellar resurfacing can be predicted using a combination of preoperative parameter such as HSS PFA score and the intra-operative cartilage wear. We put forward an algorithm based on above findings to aid in the decision making.

A Crossed Screw Patellar Reconstruction Technique for the Treatment of the Severely Deficient Scaphoid Shaped Patella in Total Knee Arthroplasty

One of the contraindications to patella resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty is a thin and severely eroded ‘deficient’ patella. However, such patients often present with severe patellofemoral joint arthritis, patellar lateral subluxation, and patella maltracking, which can only be treated effectively with resurfacing. While various treatments have been proposed, options remain limited.Here we introduce a method of patella reconstruction using four 2.7-mm titanium cortical screws crossing each other into the inner shell of the patella. This provides a scaffold onto which bone cement and any standard polyethylene patellar component can be fixed. Postoperatively, the patient had no anterior knee pain, no patella maltracking, and no component loosening.Advantages of this technique include minimization of extensor disruption, low costs, easy accessibility, reproducibility, and improved mechanical strength.

Development of application and surgical technique of total knee arthroplasties: a systematic comparative analysis using worldwide registers

PurposeThe aim was to compare total knee arthroplasty (TKA) between countries with regard to epidemiologic data and surgical technique by the use of worldwide registers and compare findings with a previous report after one decade.MethodsA systematic search was carried out in November 2022 and compared to previous reports from 2010. We extracted data regarding implanted TKAs, patients’ age distribution, procedure types, fixation and revision rates. After identification of 28 national arthroplasty registers, 8of them, namely Australia, Canada, Denmark, England and Wales, New Zealand, Norway, Scotland and Sweden, offered sufficient data and were included in final analysis.ResultsA large variation was found in the annual number of implantations per 100,000 inhabitants with a range from 77 to 210.2 (mean 132.8). The fixation type varied strongly as well, e.g. over 95% of totally cemented TKAs in Sweden versus 61.2% cemented fixation in Denmark. Another significant difference was the use of patellar resurfacing in TKA, ranging from 47.3% (Canada) using a patellar button in TKA to less than 5% (Sweden). Within the period of one decade, the mean overall number of annual implantations increased (10%), whilst relative number of revisions decreased, the use of cemented TKA decreased from 87 to 74%, and the use of patella button remained largely inhomogeneous.ConclusionComparison of arthroplasty registers revealed large differences regarding the annual number of primary TKAs per inhabitant as well as primary TKA procedure types with an increase of annual implantations, decrease of relative number of revisions, and a decrease of the use of cemented systems over the period of one decade.

Relationships between position of patellar ridge high point and morphology of resected surface for patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty.

Reproducing the native patellar ridge high point while maximizing osseous coverage is important for the success of patellar replacement, but it cannot always be achieved simultaneously. This study aimed to thoroughly investigate the relationships and their influencing factors between the positions of the high point of patellar ridge (HPPR) and the morphology of the patellar resected surface. Four hundred seventy-three patients (265 men, 208 women) aged 18 to 50 years with knee injuries before arthroscopy were retrospectively collected for this cross-sectional study. Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were used to construct 3D computer models of the patella and patellar cartilage. The morphometric characteristics of the patellar cut after virtual resection and the HPPR position relative to the patellar cut centre were measured and analyzed. The medial displacements of the HPPR were positively correlated with Wiberg's classification and index (all P<0.001). The mean values of HPPR's medial displacements were 0.15 of the medial width of patellar cut, and 93.2% of all patella ranged from 0 to 0.3. When the implant's apex were placed at 0.15 of the medial width of patellar cut medialized, the proportion of implant placement errors within 1 mm of the native high point was 12% more in female patella (P=0.01), and 7% more in all patella (P=0.03) than 3 mm medialized. Wiberg's system can roughly predicted the medial-lateral position of the HPPR. The HPPR was mainly medially located at the 0.15 of the medial patellar width approximately, and 15% medialized of the implant's apex can better reproduce the native patellar high point than 3 mm medialized. The current results provide basic data for patellar implant selection, preoperative planning, and implant design to reproduce the native patellar high point better while maximizing osseous coverage for patellar resurfacing.

LONG-TERM SURVIVAL RATES ARE SIMILAR WITH OR WITHOUT PATELLAR RESURFACING AFTER TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY, HOWEVER, HIGHER REVISION RATE WITHOUT PATELLAR RESURFACING CAN BE PROSTHETIC-SPECIFIC: A NATIONAL JOINT REGISTRY ANALYSIS

AbstractIntroductionThe role of patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty remains controversial. We questioned the effect of patellar resurfacing on the early and late revision rates after total knee arthroplasty.Materials and MethodsWe analysed the data of cumulative revisions of primary knee replacement from the NJR 19th Annual Report. NJR included secondary patellar resurfacing as a revision. We compared differences in the 3-year and 15-year revision rates between the patellar resurfacing and non-resurfacing for the different combinations of total knee replacements using a paired t-test. We performed subgroup analysis for the five combinations with the highest volumes.ResultsTwenty-seven implant combinations had the 15-year revision rates reported. Patellar resurfacing group had lower mean 3-year revision rate of 1.68 (SD 0.7) compared to 2.02 (SD 0.9) in non-resurfacing group (p=0.05). However, 15-year revision rate was similar between the two groups (mean 5.7, SD 2.1 vs. mean 5.7, SD 2.2; p = 0.46).High volume implants showed that two combinations (NexGen CR and PS) had similar revision rates at 3 and 15 years between resurfacing and non-resurfacing groups. Three combinations (PFC Sigma CR and PS and Genesis 2 CR) had higher revision rate in non-resurfacing group at 3 years (p=0.01) and the difference persisted at 15 years (p=0.05).ConclusionsAlthough revision rate in total knee arthroplasty was higher without patellar resurfacing at 3 years, at 15 years the difference was not significant. However, the higher revision without patellar resurfacing can be prosthetic combination specific which surgeons need to be aware of.

Is Patellar Resurfacing in Total Knee Arthroplasty Associated with a Higher Incidence of Patella Baja?

Is Patellar Resurfacing in Total Knee Arthroplasty Associated with a Higher Incidence of Patella Baja?

Selective Patellar Resurfacing In Total Knee Arthroplasty For The Osteoarthritic Knee: A Prospective Study

Selective Patellar Resurfacing In Total Knee Arthroplasty For The Osteoarthritic Knee: A Prospective Study

Patellar Resurfacing Compared with No Resurfacing in Total Knee Arthroplasty

Patellar Resurfacing Compared with No Resurfacing in Total Knee Arthroplasty

553 Does Patella Implant Design Affect Outcomes? Patella Resurfacing in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Abstract Aim To investigate whether implant design affect (1)incidence of anterior knee pain, (2)patient reported outcomes and (3)reintervention rates in a resurfaced vs non-resurfaced Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA). Method MEDline, pubmed and google scholar studies were evaluated using SIGN assessment tool and data analysis was conducted using Review Manager 5.2 on only randomised controlled trials. Search terms: arthroplasty, replacement, knee (Mesh), TKA, prosthesis, patella, patellar resurfacing, patellar retaining. Results 33 randomised controlled studies were identified. A total of 11 used the modern “patella-friendly” implants and 22 used the older “patella non-friendly” implants. There was no significant difference in anterior knee pain rates for either surgical option. When using patella-friendly implant, patella resurfacing results in a statistically higher clinical (P 0.007, MD -0.77) and functional (P &amp;lt; 0.0001, MD -1.87) KSS than the non-resurfaced counterparts, but scores were not clinically significant. When the patella was not resurfaced, there was a significant increased risk of reoperation with “non-patella friendly” implant (p=0.04, OR 1.42, CI 1.01, 2.00), whilst there was no significant difference between reoperation rates for the “patella friendly” implants (OR 1.17, CI 0.59,2.30). Conclusions Patella implant design has been shown to significantly improve KSS scores but with no clinical significance. Risk of further procedures was significantly higher in non-resurfaced patella TKAs with “non-friendly” implants, likely due to increased rates of anterior knee pain in these older generation implants leading to secondary resurfacing. However, when utilising “patella-friendly” implants, resurfacing does not lower reintervention rates. This meta-analysis finds no clinical indication to resurface the patellar whilst performing a TKA.

Isolated effects of patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty and their relation to native patellar geometry

The isolated effects of patellar resurfacing on patellar kinematics are rarely investigated. Nonetheless, knowing more about these effects could help to enhance present understanding of the emergence of kinematic improvements or deteriorations associated with patellar resurfacing. The aim of this study was to isolate the effects of patellar resurfacing from a multi-stage in vitro study, where kinematics after total knee arthroplasty before and after patellar resurfacing were recorded. Additionally, the influence of the native patellar geometry on these effects was analysed. Eight fresh frozen specimens were tested successively with different implant configurations on an already established weight bearing knee rig. The patello-femoral kinematics were thereby measured using an ultrasonic measurement system and its relation to the native patellar geometries was analysed. After patellar resurfacing, the specimen showed a significantly medialized patellar shift. This medialization of the patellar tracking was significantly correlated to the lateral facet angle of the native patella. The patellar shift after patellar resurfacing is highly influenced by the position of the patellar button and the native lateral patellar facet angle. As a result, the ideal medio-lateral position of the patellar component is affected by the geometry of the native patella.

Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty leads to better isokinetic performance

BackgroundFor decades there have been concerns about patellar resurfacing (PR) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and the individual preference of the surgeon is still the main determinant of whether or not resurfacing is applied. According to preference, surgeons can be categorized in 3 main groups of those who usually, selectively, or rarely resurface. The aim of this prospective, randomized, controlled study was to compare the isokinetic performance and clinical outcome of TKAs with PR and without PR. MethodsA total of 50 patients scheduled to undergo TKA for primary osteoarthritis of the knee were randomly assigned to either the PR or non-PR groups. There were no significant differences between the groups in respect of age, BMI, gender and preoperative Knee Society Score (KSS) and isokinetic performance. Patients were evaluated at postoperative 3, 6, and 12 months with KSS and at 6 months and 1 year with isokinetic measurements. ResultsThe PR group had a higher mean score, especially in the functional component of KSS, but the difference was not statistically significant. Knee extension peak torque was significantly higher in the PR group at 6 months (p = 0.029) and 1 year (p = 0.004) postoperatively. There were no significant differences between the groups in respect of knee flexion peak torque values following TKA. ConclusionsThe results of this study demonstrated that PR during TKA is associated with better isokinetic performance and higher knee scores. These results support routine/usually resurfacing of the patella. For surgeons who selectively resurface the patella, the advantage of better isokinetic performance may be taking into consideration in favor of resurfacing the patella where they are undecided. Level of evidenceLevel I, therapeutic study.

No patella resurfacing total knee arthroplasty leads to reduction in the thickness of patellar cartilage to less than half within 5\u2009years: a quantitative longitudinal evaluation using MRI

PurposePatellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains controversial as recent meta-analyses have not shown its clear superiority; however, most authors recommend it because it is associated with less frequent anterior knee pain and need for reoperation. We aimed to clarify the changes in patellar cartilage thickness in no patellar resurfacing TKA using a ceramic femoral component on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).MethodsBetween 2009 and 2014, 40 consecutive patients (59 knees) were included in this study. All patients underwent TKA using zirconia ceramic femoral implants without patellar resurfacing. Indications for no patellar resurfacing TKA were absence of anterior knee pain, patellar compression pain, and osteoarthritic changes in the patellofemoral joint on plain radiography. The mean postoperative follow-up duration was 81.5 months (range, 25–131 months). Clinical and radiological evaluations were performed preoperatively and 5 years after TKA. Patellar cartilage thickness was evaluated preoperatively and every year for 5 years after TKA using MRI T2-weighted imaging. The patellar cartilage was divided into three regions of interest: medial, central, and lateral. To standardise the variation in patellar thickness among patients, the percent cartilage thickness was calculated.ResultsThe implant’s position was appropriate in all cases. Compared to preoperative scores, 5 years postoperatively, the Japanese Orthopedic Association score and Oxford knee score significantly improved from 52.1 to 84.7; mean tilting angle and congruence angle did not change significantly; mean lateral shift ratio significantly increased from 7.1% to 14.6%; cartilage thickness significantly decreased (P < 0.05); and the percentage cartilage thickness of the central, medial, and lateral cartilage zones gradually thinned to less than half. Four patients underwent conversion to patellar resurfacing due to anterior knee pain, without loosening the femoral and tibial implants.ConclusionThe patellar cartilage thickness decreased to less than half its preoperative level within 5 years after no patellar resurfacing TKA; this would led to clinical problems and conversion to patellar resurfacing.Level of evidenceLevel III.

Anthropometric measurements of patellar ridge using computed tomography-based three-dimensional computer models

BackgroundThe objectives of this study were to investigate the anatomic morphology of patellar ridge using computed tomography-based three-dimensional (3D) computer models and to assess the center of the patellar ridge after virtual resections.MethodsWe selected 80 patients, 40 males (age, 33.2±6.8 years) and 40 females (age, 30.6±7.2 years), who were slightly symptomatic with soft tissue injury of the knee joint. The right or left knees were scanned by computed tomography (CT). The CT data of 160 knees was used to construct 3D computer models by image analysis software (Mimics). Variables such as the angle between the patellar ridge and patellar long axis, the distance between the center of the patellar ridge and the center of patellar cut after virtual resections were measured. We detect differences between the sides and genders with the 3D computer models by Student’s t test. Simple linear regression and correlation test was used to correlate the patellar ridge center to the center of the patellar cut.ResultsAccording to the available data, there were significant gender differences in the length and width of patellar cut after virtual resections even with strict control for the height and weight of the patients. The angle between the patellar ridge and the patellar long axis was 11.24° ± 3.62°. The angle in male patients was 10.17° ± 4.82°, and it was 12.28°± 3.78° in female patients. The morphological difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). After using the subchondral method to virtually resect the patellae, with reference to the center of the patellar cut, the center of the patellar ridge lies superiorly and medially in 88.75%, inferiorly and medially in 8.75%, laterally and superiorly in 2.5%, and in no case laterally and inferiorly. The intra-observer reliability regarding the dimensional measurements was excellent in this study.ConclusionsAdvances in 3D computer models had resulted in the availability of preoperative measurement and virtual planning. The anthropometric dimensions of this study could provide general information for guiding surgical management of the patella in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and were useful in designing patellar implants.Clinical relevanceThe placement of the patellar component during TKA differs from one patella to another. The anatomic morphology information of the patellar ridge is helpful for surgeons to perform patellar resurfacing in TKA.

Outcome after total knee arthroplasty with or without patellar resurfacing

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background: &lt;/strong&gt;Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty has had its defenders and detractors. There seems to be a great difference in patellar resurfacing between countries and patellar resurfacing is still controversial. Some surgeons resurface the patella routinely, others not at all, and a third group prefers selective resurfacing. Therefore, in this prospective and randomised study, we compared the outcome after total knee arthroplasty with or without patellar resurfacing.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;In this study 50 cases (100 knees) were selected and each case was followed up for 2 years. In each case, one knee was operated by TKA with patellar resurfacing and the other by TKA with patellar non-resurfacing. Patients were followed-up for a period of 2 years and clinical and functional outcome of both knees was measured and compared by the help of knee society score (KSS) and VAS score.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;There was statistically significant difference between the patellar resurfacing and non-resurfacing group with regard to knee society score, pain score and visual analogue score (VAS), with the patellar resurfacing having better scores. There was no significant difference in the functional scores between the 2 groups. Range of motion was complication rate was comparable in both the groups. However, there was no case of reoperation nor was there any complication related to the patellar implant. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusions:&lt;/strong&gt; Patellar resurfacing in TKA leads to less post-operative persisting knee pain, and also leads to better outcome in terms of walking without pain, using stairs without pain and rest pain as compared to TKA without patellar resurfacing.&lt;/p&gt;

Subchondral Bone Condition and Intraoperative Grading of Cartilage Degeneration Underneath Patella Unrelated to the Clinical Outcome after TKA with Unresurfaced Patella.

The degree of cartilage degeneration assessed intraoperatively may not be sufficient as a criterion for patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, single-photon emission tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) is useful for detecting osteoarthritic involvement deeper in the subchondral bone. The purpose of the study was to determine whether SPECT/CT reflected the cartilage lesion underneath the patella in patients with end-stage osteoarthritis (OA) and whether clinical outcomes after TKA without patellar resurfacing differed according to the severity of patellofemoral (PF) OA determined by visual assessment and SPECT/CT findings. This study included 206 knees which underwent TKA. The degree of cartilage degeneration was graded intraoperatively according to the International Cartilage Repair Society grading system. Subjects were classified into low and high uptake groups according to the degree of bone tracer uptake (BTU) on SPECT/CT in the PF joint. The Feller's patella score and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) were assessed preoperatively and postoperative 1 and 2 years. The increased BTU in the PF joint was associated with more severe degenerative cartilage changes underneath the patella (p < 0.001). The risk for the presence of denudated cartilage was greater in the high uptake group (odds ratio = 5.89). There was no association between clinical outcomes and visual grading of patellar cartilage degeneration or the degree of BTU on SPECT/CT. The visual assessment of the degree of cartilage degeneration underneath the patella and preoperative SPECT/CT evaluation of the PF joint were not predictive of clinical outcome after TKA with unresurfaced patella.

Controversy: supporting patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty - do it.

Patellar resurfacing during total knee arthroplasty remains a controversial topic.Some surgeons routinely resurface the patella to avoid the increased rates of postoperative anterior knee pain and reoperation for secondary resurfacing, whilst others selectively resurface based on the presence of preoperative anterior knee pain, damaged articular cartilage, inflammatory arthritis, isolated patellofemoral arthritis, and patellar subluxation and/or maltracking. A third group of surgeons never resurface the patella.The anatomy and biomechanics of the patellofemoral joint as well as the advances in surgical techniques and prosthetic design must be taken into account when making a decision about whether to resurface the patella. Accurate component implantation if the patella is resurfaced becomes crucial to avoid complications.In our institution before 2008 we were performing a selective resurfacing of the patella, but in the last decade we have decided to always resurface it, with good outcomes and low complication rate. A reproducible surgical technique may be helpful in reducing the risk of postoperative anterior knee pain and complications related to implants.In this article we analyse the current trend and controversial topics in dealing with the patella in total knee arthroplasty, and discuss the available literature in order to sustain our choice.Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2020;5:785-792. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.190075

Patellar Denervation Reduces Postoperative Anterior Knee Pain After Patellar Resurfacing Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BackgroundThe benefit of patellar denervation (PD) in patellar resurfacing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is still debatable. This prospective, randomized controlled trial investigated whether circumferential PD should be performed in patellar resurfacing TKA. MethodsA total of 241 patients who underwent unilateral TKA were randomized into PD or non-PD groups. Incidence, intensity, and presentation time of anterior knee pain (AKP) and clinical outcomes were evaluated at 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months postoperatively. ResultsThe incidence of AKP was significantly lower in the PD group (6.4% vs 16.2%, P = .032). The intensity of AKP and patient satisfaction scores were significantly better in the PD group at 3 months but not after 3 months. The presentation time of AKP mostly occurs at 3 months after surgery. The Knee Society score, range of motion, Oxford score, patellar score, activity of daily living score, and visual analog scale of overall knee pain were not significantly different between the two groups during the follow-up period. ConclusionGiven that PD can improve AKP and patient satisfaction at an early period postoperatively without jeopardizing clinical outcomes at no additional cost, this inexpensive procedure readily available in nearly every operation room is strongly recommended during primary TKA with patellar resurfacing.

Does Patella Resurfacing Affect Postoperative Blood Loss in Patients Undergoing Total Knee Replacement?

Patella resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty remains a surgeon-specific decision. Possible benefits of resurfacing include decreased knee pain and rate of reoperation, while complications can occur. No study has assessed postoperative blood loss and transfusion rate as a function of patella resurfacing. Certain patient groups such as elderly patients, Jehovah’s Witnesses, and coagulopathy patients may especially benefit from decreased blood loss during orthopedic surgeries. A retrospective chart review of patients with total knee arthroplasty performed by a single surgeon was conducted. In total, 124 patients were identified that met inclusion criteria with 34 patients in the patella-resurfaced group and 90 patients in the unresurfaced group. Hematocrit level was recorded preoperatively and compared with the hematocrit levels on postoperative days 1 through 3. The primary outcome of average percent drop in hematocrit and SD on postoperative day 1, 2, and 3 was calculated for resurfaced and nonresurfaced groups and data were analyzed for secondary outcomes stratified by sex. After analysis no statistically significant difference in postoperative blood loss between resurfaced and nonresurfaced groups was found.