Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography Results Research Articles

Risk factors of negative diagnosis of MRCP in acute biliary pancreatitis patients with choledocholithiasis.

Assessment of the presence of choledocholithiasis is crucial among acute biliary pancreatitis (ABP). Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) are widely used to identify the gallstones of common bile duct (CBD). EUS provides better diagnostic accuracy and sensitivity than MRCP but carries a certain risk due to sedation. We investigated the risk factors of negative diagnosis of MRCP in ABP patients with choledocholithiasis for better selection of MRCP or EUS. A total of 2321 ABP patients were retrospectively included in this study. Based on the exclusion criteria, 337 ABP patients with negative MRCP results were ultimately included. Among these patients, 75 patients had positive EUS findings. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to screen the risk factors of negative diagnosis of MRCP in ABP patients with choledocholithiasis. Patients with positive EUS findings were older (62.0 vs. 55.0) and had higher rate of cholecystectomy history (18.7% vs. 7.3%) than those with negative EUS findings. The result of univariate logistic regression showed that the history of cholecystectomy, age and sex were potential risk factors (all p < 0.05). Then after adjusting the other potential risk factors (Direct bilirubin (DBIL), alanine transaminase (ALT), gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP)), a history of cholecystectomy (OR = 2.859 [1.312,6.23]), older age (1.03 [1.009,1.052]) and male (2.016 [1.152,3.528]) were independent risk factors of negative diagnosis of MRCP in ABP patients with choledocholithiasis. The history of cholecystectomy, older age and male are independently associated with an increased risk of negative diagnosis of MRCP in ABP patients with choledocholithiasis. We suggest that patients with these risk factors should undergo EUS first, rather than MRCP.

Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in acute cholecystitis: Is it necessary for patients with normal common bile duct diameter?

AbstractAimInvestigating concurrent choledocholithiasis in patients with acute cholecystitis (AC) and normal common bile duct (CBD) diameter on ultrasound by performing magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) can be challenging. This study aims to determine the conditions that necessitate MRCP before surgery and its potential impact on the course of treatment for these patients.Patients and methodsWe included 100 patients with AC and normal CBD diameter who were admitted to Shahid Modarres Hospital from September 2019 to September 2022. Patients with elevated levels of any liver serum markers above the upper limit of normal underwent MRCP.ResultsThe MRCP results were positive in 45.16% of cases and altered the type of treatment in 35.48% of them. The findings indicated that direct [area under the curve (AUC) = 0.782; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.597–0.909] and total bilirubin (AUC = 0.697; 95% CI 0.507–0.849) were significantly effective in predicting the positive findings for concurrent CBD stone or Mirizzi's syndrome on MRCP. The optimal cutoff values for direct and total bilirubin were found to be above 1.02 and 2.19 mg/dL. Concerning the alteration of treatment approaches, direct bilirubin demonstrated predictive value (P = .014) at levels above 1.02 mg/dL.ConclusionsIn cases of AC with a normal CBD diameter on ultrasound and mild elevations in liver function parameters, including total and direct bilirubin, it is not routinely necessary to perform MRCP. However, if these laboratory values exceed a certain threshold, MRCP is recommended as it may reveal alternative diagnoses that could alter the clinical management.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Cholangio-Pancreatography (MRCP) in Evaluating Obstructive Jaundice, Keeping Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangio-Pancreatography(ERCP) as Gold Standard

Objective: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography in evaluating obstructive Jaundice, taking Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography as the gold standard.&#x0D; Study Design: Cross-sectional study.&#x0D; Place and Duration of Study: Armed Forces Institute of Radiology and Imaging in collaboration with the Gastroenterology Department of Military Hospital, Rawalpindi Pakistan, from Jun to Dec 2019.&#x0D; Methodology: Ninety patients with a history of obstructive Jaundice referred to the Armed Forces Institute of Radiology and Imaging for Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography were included in the study. Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography was followed by Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography within 48 hours. Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography results were compared with Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography and diagnostic accuracy was calculated.&#x0D; Results: The mean age was 57.58±14.65 years. The study constituted 40 male (44.4%) and 50 female (55.6%) patients. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and diagnostic accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography, keeping Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography as the gold standard, were calculated as 91.04%, 89.04%, 95.31%, 76.90% and 90.0%, respectively. The positive likelihood ratio was 7, while the negative likelihood ratio was 0.10.&#x0D; Conclusion: Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography is a non-invasive and safe investigation with excellent diagnostic accuracy in evaluating obstructive Jaundice. Thus, Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography may be an alternative to Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography, especially in cases without intervention or in pregnant females, as it is free from ionizing radiation.

FTP7.3 Retrospective Cohort Study of the Efficacy of Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography in the Diagnosing Choledocholithiasis in Risk-Stratified Patients

Abstract Aims National guidelines emphasise the role of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) in the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis to guide further management. The aim of this study was to determine the risk factor(s) associated with choledocholithiasis on MRCP. Methods A retrospective cohort study of all consecutive adult MRCPs was conducted in a single centre from October 2021 to September 2022. Patient demographics, laboratory results, other imaging modalities and MRCP results were analysed. Peak liver function test values were used pre-MRCP. Patients found to have hepatopancreatobiliary malignancies were excluded. Results A total of 442 patients were identified, 278 (62.9%) were female. Median age was 63 (IQR 50-74). 293 (66.3%) were inpatient scans whilst 178 (40.3%) were urgent requests. Median time from admission to MRCP performed for inpatients was 2.2 days (IQR 1.4-4.1). 121 (27.4%) MRCPs reported positive for choledocholithiasis. Choledocholithiasis on MRCP was positively correlated to raised alkaline phosphatase (p=0.004), hyperbilirubinaemia (p&amp;lt;0.001), jaundice (p&amp;lt;0.001) and evidence of ductal dilatation on ultrasound and/or CT imaging (p&amp;lt;0.001). It was not correlated to upper abdominal pain, age and gender. Conclusion The incidence of choledocholithiasis on MRCP in this study is comparable to recent published data. Patients should be risk-stratified and MRCP performed only if they have high-risk features to maximise the utility of MRCP.

Overlap syndrome of primary biliary cholangitis and primary sclerosing cholangitis: two case reports

BackgroundOverlap syndrome between primary biliary cholangitis and primary sclerosing cholangitis is an extremely rare condition that has been reported in only few published cases so far in the literature. We highlight here the rarity of this condition and indicate the importance of its recognition.Case presentationWe report two cases showing the manifestations of both primary biliary cholangitis and primary sclerosing cholangitis in two Tunisian female patients aged 74 and 42 years, respectively. The first case is a woman who was initially diagnosed with decompensated cirrhosis. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography showed multiple strictures of the common bile duct, and histological findings led to the diagnosis of primary biliary cholangitis/primary sclerosing cholangitis. She was successfully treated with ursodeoxycholic acid. The second case is a middle-aged woman, suffering from primary biliary cholangitis and who was treated with ursodeoxycholic acid. At her 12 month follow-up appointment, she presented with a partial clinical and biochemical response. Tests showed normal thyroid function, liver autoimmune tests for autoimmune hepatitis were negative, and celiac disease markers were also negative. The diagnosis of overlap syndrome of primary biliary cholangitis/primary sclerosing cholangitis was finally made on the results of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography that showed multiple strictures of the common as well as intrahepatic bile ducts. The patient was put on ursodeoxycholic acid at a higher dose.ConclusionsOur cases raise awareness for this rare condition and indicate the importance of recognizing a possible overlap syndrome, especially in patients with primary biliary cholangitis, to optimize treatment. We suggest considering the overlap syndrome of primary biliary cholangitis/primary sclerosing cholangitis when a patient presents with the diagnostic criteria of both diseases.

Is Post COVID-19 cholangiopathy an appropriate ındication for liver transplantation?

The effect of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2, which has infected more than 765 million people in the world to date, has decreased gradually, but the effect of late complications after the disease has begun to increase. Post-coronavirus disease 2019 cholangiopathy can be considered as one of the late complications identified in patients recovering from SARS-CoV-2 infection. A 38-year-old man was admitted to our emergency department with fever up to 39,5ºC, dry cough, anosmia, and dyspnea for 4 days. In the chest computed tomography, extensive opacity areas were compatible with multifocal pneumonia. A throat swab confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. The patient was treated in the intensive care unit with mechanical ventilator support during 4 weeks. A significant increase in cholestasis enzymes was observed in the patient's control blood. The results of Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangio Pancreatography and liver biopsy performed for the etiology of the patient were compatible with post-COVID-19 cholangiopathy. Liver transplantation from a living donor was performed in the patient whose cholangiopathy continued in the first year of follow-up. The patient's clinical course was positive after liver transplantation. It emphasizes that despite the improvement in the lung involvement of COVID-19, the virus can cause long-term liver damage. Liver transplantation may sometimes be required in the treatment of post-COVID-19 cholangiopathy, as in our patient. The persistence of the patient's liver disease for approximately 1 year after Covid-19 and its positive course after liver transplantation show that post-COVID-19 cholangiopathy is a suitable indication for transplantation. The persistence of elevated cholestasis enzymes and bilirubin values after recovery from COVID-19 may help identify patients with post-COVID-19 cholangiopathy in the early period. Early recognition of the occurrence of post-COVID-19 cholangiopathy is important to decide the appropriate course of action.

Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) Images after Black Tea Consumption

Aim: To evaluate black tea consumption as a negative contrast agent for better imaging of MRCP. Study design: Prospective study. Place and duration of study: Department of Radiology, JPMC Karachi from 1st January 2022 to 30th June 2022. Methodology: One hundred healthy individuals, who volunteered for this research, were provided an informed written consent to sign before their study enrolment. Tea bags from 3 different tea bag companies were used. The efficacy of improvement of MRCP image as a consequence of tea consumption was further noted by a standard procedure. The intensity of signals was measured by circular-ROI (1cm2). The intensity signal was based on noise and measured as signal void. The MRCP results were taken before tea intake after 5 minutes of tea intake and up to 15 minutes were performed. The results were observed through MRCP images. Results: Comparison of visibility in the distal part of the common bile duct by VAS and Likert method showed significant differences before and after the tea consumption and showed better image quality after tea consumption. Comparisons of duodenum and stomach according to VAS and Likert methods were statistically significant. Conclusion: Significant results were obtained after the consumption of black tea for better quality MRCP imaging. Keywords: MRCP; Tea consumption, Better quality imaging; Gastrointestinal system

The Diagnostic Value of GGT-Based Biochemical Indicators for Choledocholithiasis with Negative Imaging Results of Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography.

To reveal the relationship between a group of preoperative biochemical indicators such as GGT, ALP, ALT, AST, TB, and DB and the occurrence of common bile duct stones in patients with negative results of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography, a retrospective diagnostic accuracy clinical test is conducted in this study. In order to reduce the missed diagnosis rate of choledocholithiasis and perform more accurate common bile duct exploration, 466 patients who underwent surgical treatment of cholelithiasis from January 2014 to December 2015 have been analyzed retrospectively. Firstly, the confounding factors are corrected through Binary Logistic regression. Then, the diagnostic efficacy of each indicator is measured by the ROC curve among different types of patients. In all patients, the top three individual indicators with the greatest AUC curve area for predicting common bile duct stones can be observed from the results of MRCP, γ-glutamyl transpeptidase, and alkaline phosphatase. Besides, the diagnostic efficiency of the comprehensive evaluation is higher than that of all individual indicators. For MRCP-negative patients, the top three largest AUC curve area of the diagnostic efficacy for choledocholithiasis were GGT, ALP, and DB. For patients who have a suspected diagnosis of secondary choledocholithiasis, the diagnostic efficacy of the combination of imaging results, biochemical indexes, common bile duct width, and other abnormal indicators for choledocholithiasis is much higher than that of the single abnormal biochemical indexes for the prediction of choledocholithiasis. For MRCP-negative patients, GGT, ALP, DB, and the width of common bile duct diameter are valuable for the prediction of common bile duct stones, and GGT is the most valuable diagnostic predictor.

Liver Blood Tests in the Management of Suspected Choledocholithiasis

The likelihood of common bile duct (CBD) stones considers liver blood tests (LBTs) if they are markedly altered only. The aim of our study was to find a reliable tool based on LBTs to predict the presence of CBD stones. We retrospectively considered all patients who underwent magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) because of suspected CBD stones from January 2014 to June 2019. Demographic, clinical data, and LBT values were collected and analyzed. We selected 191 patients, 64 (33.5%) with positive MRCP and 127 (66.5%) with negative MRCP. The analysis showed that our compound LBT-based score had 83.6%, 90.7%, and 90.6% sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive values, respectively, in determining MRCP results. We designed a weighted score with high diagnostic power in determining MRCP results that could help in differentiating between candidates for primary cholecystectomy and patients who benefit from preoperative MRCP.

Hounsfield unit density in the characterisation of bile duct lesions.

PurposeTo study the density of lesions in the lumens of extrahepatic bile ducts through computed tomography examinations, and to compare their characterisations with the results of pathology and/or endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).MethodsThe density of lesions along extrahepatic bile ducts were measured and compared with pathology and/or ERCP. The lesions were evaluated in two main groups: benign or malignant. The bile duct wall enhancement, intrahepatic bile ducts, and gallbladder were also evaluated.ResultsThe study was conducted with computed tomography scans of 197 cases (93 females, 104 males) who had optimal imaging. The results regarding density of extrahepatic intraductal lesions that were studied at BT were compared with pathology and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography results. Of 197 lesions, 125 (63.5%) were reported as benign and 72 (36.5%) were reported as malignant. The results for benign lesions showed an average density of 66.67 ± 17.30 Hounsfield units (HU), and for malignant lesions the average density was 82.38 ± 13.67 HU.ConclusionLesion density level (HU) gives valuable information for the differentiation between benign and malign lesions in intraluminal extrahepatic bile ducts.

The Use of Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) in the Setting of Acute Pancreatitis: When is it Most Useful?

CONTEXTThe usefulness of MRCP in the workup of acute pancreatitis has long been debated.METHODS2013-2016 chart review data were collected by the authors from adult patients with acute pancreatitis who also had received Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography (MRCP). Those patients were categorized by diagnosis and according to whether or not the MRCP changed healthcare services.RESULTSChanges in care were significantly correlated with diagnosis and elevated liver function tests (LFT). The patients who benefitted most from MRCP were those with acute gallstone pancreatitis (r = 0.298, n = 109, p = 0.002) and patients with elevated LFT (r = 0.219, n = 89, p= 0.040). The most common way that MRCP influenced the care of patients with acute gallstone pancreatitis was by allowing providers to forego intraoperative cholangiogram (IOC) when MRCP results were negative (r = 0.335, n = 109, p < 0.001).CONCLUSIONSThe authors conclude that this was not the most cost effective management practice since the cost of intraoperative cholangiogram was about one quarter that of MRCP. Limiting MRCP use in patients with acute gallstone pancreatitis and preferentially using IOC at the time of surgery can likely decrease hospital costs without compromising care.

MRCP Versus ERCP in the Evaluation of Chronic Pancreatitis in Children: Which Is the Better Choice?

To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) in the detection of chronic pancreatitis (CP)-specific changes in the pediatric population. The study included 48 children with pancreatic disorders subjected to both endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and MRCP within a 1- to 4-month interval. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of MRCP in the detection of CP-specific changes were determined using ERCP as a diagnostic standard. Diagnostic ERCP pancreatograms were obtained in 41 (85.4%) of 48 patients and diagnostic MRCP images in all 48 children. The sensitivity and positive predictive value of MRCP were 77.1% and 90%, respectively, and its specificity and negative predictive value amounted to 50% and 27.3%, respectively. The patients with consistent results of MRCP and ERCP (ie, true-positive and true-negative cases) and individuals with incompatible results of the tests (ie, false-positive and false-negative cases) differed in terms of their median age at MRCP (14.17 vs 10.33 years) and median CP stage according to the Cambridge Scale (4 vs 2). Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography provides diagnostic information equivalent to ERCP in a large percentage of pediatric patients with CP and should be used as the imaging method of choice, especially if the likelihood of therapeutic intervention is low.

Serology and ultrasound for diagnosis of choledocholithiasis.

Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) is not a routine investigation to exclude choledocholithiasis unless there is clinical or biochemical suspicion of common bile duct (CBD) stones. This study attempted to determine which radiological or serological parameters best predicted CBD stones. All patients undergoing MRCP from 2005 to 2011 were selected. Patients with pancreatitis were excluded. Liver function tests (LFTs) at admission and prior to MRCP were recorded, as was abdominal ultrasonography and MRCP results. Parameters measured routinely on LFTs included alkaline phosphatase (ALP), alanine transaminase (ALT) and bilirubin. Receiver operating characteristic curve area analysis (area under the curve [AUC]) and chi-squared analysis were undertaken. Overall, 195 patients were identified, 71 of whom had CBD stones on MRCP. Raised ALP levels on admission demonstrated a correlation with CBD stones (AUC: 0.619, odds ratio [OR]: 3.16, p=0.06). At ultrasonography, a dilated CBD (OR: 3.76, p<0.001) and intrahepatic duct dilation (OR: 5.56, p<0.001) were highly significant predictors. However, only 37% of patients had a dilated CBD on ultrasonography. Ongoing elevation of LFT parameters, particularly ALP (AUC: 0.707, OR: 4.64, p<0.001) and ALT (AUC: 0.646, OR: 5.40, p<0.001), displayed a significant correlation with CBD stones. Ongoing (even if minor) elevations of liver function test parameters should prompt the need to exclude CBD stones even in the presence of a normal CBD diameter on ultrasonography.

Role of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in diagnosing choledochal cysts: Case series and review

To determine the merits of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) as the primary diagnostic test for choledochal cysts (CC's). Between 2009 and 2012, patients who underwent MRCP for perioperative diagnosis were identified. Demographic information, clinical characteristics, and radiographic findings were recorded. MRCP results were compared with intraoperative findings. A PubMed search identified studies published between 1996-2012, employing MRCP as the primary preoperative imaging and comparing results with either endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) or operative findings. Detection rates for CC's and abnormal pancreaticobiliary junction (APBJ) were calculated. In addition detection rates for clinically related biliary pathology like choledocholithiasis and cholangiocarcinomas in patients diagnosed with CC's were also evaluated. Eight patients were identified with CC's. Six patients out of them had type IV CC's, 1 had type I and 1 had a new variant of choledochal cyst with confluent dilatation of the common bile duct (CBD) and cystic duct. Seven patients had an APBJ and 3 of those had a long common-channel. Gallstones were found in 2 patients, 1 had a CBD stone, and 1 pancreatic-duct stone was also detected. In all cases, MRCP successfully identified the type of CC's, as well as APBJ with ductal stones. From analyzing the literature, we found that MRCP has 96%-100% detection rate for CC's. Additionally, we found that the range for sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy was 53%-100%, 90%-100% and 56%-100% in diagnosing APBJ. MRCP's detection rate was 100% for choledocholithiasis and 87% for cholangiocarcinomas with concurrent CC's. After initial ultrasound and computed tomography scan, MRCP should be the next diagnostic test in both adult and pediatric patients. ERCP should be reserved for patients where therapeutic intervention is needed.

Comparison of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) in Bile Duct Imaging

Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in diagnosing bile duct pathologies. Materials and Methods: We documented the data of 171 patients with both ERCP and MRCP between January 2009 and December 2010 at the Konya Education and Research Hospital. Results: Of the 171 patients, 100 (58.5%) were female and 71 (41.5%) were male. The median age was 63 (55 to 89). ERCP was used to diagnose bile duct stones in 102 (59%) patients, bile duct tumour in 14 (8%) patients, hydatic cysts opening up to the bile duct in 4 (2%) patients and bile duct stenosis in 3 (1.8%) patients. For the detection of bile duct stones, MRCP had a sensitivity of 92%, a specificity of 74% and a diagnostic accuracy of 83%. For bile duct tumours, MRCP had a sensitivity of 85%, a specificity of 98% and a diagnostic accuracy rate of 92%. Conclusion: In our centre, the results of MRCP and ERCP were similar for the last two years. However, MRCP was superior with respect to diagnosis as it was cheaper and non-invasive. Thus, ERCP should be preferred for therapeutic processes.

Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis: Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Performance of MR Cholangiopancreatography

To determine the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) for detection of primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) in patients with biochemical cholestasis. Two reviewers searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and other electronic databases to identify prospective studies in which MRCP was evaluated and compared with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), clinical examination, and/or histologic analysis for diagnosis of PSC in cholestasis and control cases. Main study inclusion criteria were (a) use of ERCP or percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography (PTC) as part of the reference standard for the diagnosis of PSC, (b) inclusion of patients with hepatobiliary disease other than PSC (ie, nonhealthy control subjects), (c) blinding of MRCP image readers to reference-standard results, (d) prospective study with ERCP or MRCP performed after subject recruitment into the study, and (e) inclusion of raw data (for true-positive, false-positive, true-negative, and false-negative results) that could be found or calculated from the original study data. Major exclusion criteria were duplicate article (on a primary study) that contained all or some of the original study data and inclusion of fewer than 10 patients with PSC. Methodologic quality was assessed by using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool. Bivariate random-effects meta-analytic methods were used to estimate summary, sensitivity, specificity, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Six manuscripts with 456 subjects (with 623 independent readings)--185 with PSC--met the study inclusion criteria. The summary area under the ROC curve was 0.91. High heterogeneity (inconsistency index, 78%) was found but became moderate (inconsistency index, 36%) with the exclusion of one study in which the diagnostic threshold was set for high sensitivity. There was no evidence of publication bias (P = .27, bias coefficient analysis). Sensitivity and specificity of MRCP for PSC detection across all studies were 0.86 and 0.94, respectively. Positive and negative likelihood ratios with MRCP were 15.3 and 0.15, respectively. In patients with high pretest probabilities, MRCP enabled confirmation of PSC; in patients with low pretest probabilities, MRCP enabled exclusion of PSC. Worst-case-scenario (pretest probability, 50%) posttest probabilities were 94% and 13% for positive and negative MRCP results, respectively. MRCP has high sensitivity and very high specificity for diagnosis of PSC. In many cases of suspected PSC, MRCP is sufficient for diagnosis, and, thus, the risks associated with ERCP can be avoided.

Evaluation of the efficacy and reproducibility of cholangiopancreatography by magnetic resonance for detecting biliary complications following orthotopic liver transplantation

To evaluate the accuracy and reproducibility of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) in the detection of biliary complications in liver transplanted patients. A study was conducted, with blinded review of 28 MRCP exams of 24 patients submitted to liver transplantation. The images were reviewed by two independent observers, at two different moments, regarding the degree of biliary tree visualization and the presence or absence of biliary complications. The MRCP results were compared, when negative, to at least 3 months of clinical and biochemical follow-up, and when positive, to the findings at surgery or endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). The degree of intrahepatic biliary tree visualization was considered good or excellent in 78.6% and 82.1% of the exams by the two observers and visualization of the donor duct, recipient duct and biliary anastomosis was considered good or excellent in 100% of the exams, by both observers. Six biliary complications were detected (21.4%), all of them anastomotic strictures. Intra and interobserver agreement were substantial or almost perfect (kappa k values of 0.611 to 0.804) for the visualization of the biliary tree and almost perfect (k values of 0.900 to 1.000) for the detection of biliary complications. MRCP achieved 100% sensitivity, 95.45% specificity, 85.7% positive predictive value and 100% negative predictive value for the detection of biliary complications. MRCP is an accurate examination for the detection of biliary complications after orthotopic liver transplantation and it is a highly reproducible method in the evaluation of the biliary tree of liver transplanted patients.

Comparative diagnostic evaluation with MR cholangiopancreatography, ultrasonography and CT in patients with pancreatobiliary disease

The aim of this study was to directly compare the results of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) with those of ultrasonography (US) and multislice computed tomography (MSCT) in the diagnosis of pancreaticobiliary diseases. A total of 70 patients (41 men, 29 women) aged 22-89 years were studied either before (n=59) or after cholecystectomy (n=11) for biliary lithiasis. Clinical signs and symptoms were jaundice (n=15), abdominal pain (n=37) and proven biliary lithiasis (n=18). MRCP was performed in all patients, whereas abdominal US was performed in 55 (group 1) and MSCT in 37 (group 2) patients. A regional evaluation of the main structures of the pancreaticobiliary system was performed: gallbladder and cystic duct, intra- and extrahepatic bile ducts and main pancreatic duct. Histology (n=27), biopsy (n=5), endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) (n=28) and/or clinical-imaging follow-up (n=10) were considered standards of reference. In particular, patients were classified as showing benign (n=47) or malignant (n=12) lesions or normal biliary anatomy (n=11). In group 1, the results of MRCP and US were concordant in the majority (92%) of cases; however, statistically significant discordance (p<0.01) was found in the evaluation of the extrahepatic ducts, with nine cases (16%) of middle-distal common bile duct stones being detected on MRCP only. In group 2, the results of MRCP and MSCT were also concordant in most cases (87%). However, findings were significantly discordant when the intra- and extrahepatic ducts were analysed, with seven (19%) and six (16%) cases, respectively, of lithiasis being detected on MRCP only (p<0.01 for both). The results of our study confirm the diagnostic potential of MRCP in the study of the pancreaticobiliary duct system. In particular, the comparison between MRCP and US and MSCT indicates the superiority of MRCP in evaluating bile ducts and detecting stones in the common bile duct.

MRCP vs ERCP in the evaluation of biliary pathologies: Review of current literature

Recently developed magnetic resonance (MR) techniques permit fast and correct imaging of the entire biliary tree with a high spatial resolution. The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic potential of one of these new MR sequences in magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) procedure and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with review of current literatures. A total of 295 patients were enrolled in this study prospectively. Of these, 11 were excluded from the study due to inadequate MRCP image quality and 15 more were excluded due to unsuccessful cannulation during ERCP. Thus, finally 269 patients (124 men and 145 women with a mean age of 57 years; range: 23-92 years) were included. The MRCP procedure was performed before the ERCP in all cases. All MRCP studies were performed with recently developed new MR technique using a heavily T2-weighted turbo spin echo (TSE) sequence. This TSE sequence is currently one of the most widely used multiplanar 3-D MR technique, having a high spatial resolution and fast imaging capacity. The study participants were classified into four main groups; normal into group I, stone disease into group II, tumor into group III and others into group IV. Group I consisted of 228 patients who had a normal pancreaticobiliary tree on both the MRCP and ERCP examinations. In group II there were 18 patients, for whom the MRCP had a 88.9% sensitivity and a 100% specificity for diagnosing biliary stone disease. Its positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and accuracy rates were 100%, 99.2% and 99.2%, respectively. The MRCP had a 100% sensitivity and a 100% specificity for 20 patients in group III. It also had 100% PPV, 100% NPV, and 100% total accuracy rates in this group. In three patients in group IV, the MRCP had a 100% sensitivity and specificity, respectively. Its PPV, NPV and accuracy were 100%, 100% and 100%, respectively. MRCP is used with increasing frequency as a non-invasive alternative to ERCP and the diagnostic results of MRCP with a heavily T2-weighted TSE MR sequence and ERCP are comparable with high accuracy in various hepatobiliary pathologies.

The Selective Use of Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography in the Imaging of the Axial Biliary Tree in Patients with Acute Gallstone Pancreatitis

Background: Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) is an emerging modality in the management of acute gallstone pancreatitis (AGP). The aim of this study was to assess the impact following the introduction of MRCP in the management of AGP in a tertiary referral unit. Methods: Patients presenting with AGP from January 2002 to December 2004 were reviewed to assess the impact of the introduction of MRCP in June 2003. The indication for MRCP was suspected common bile duct (CBD) stones in the absence of biliary sepsis. Definitive treatment for AGP was laparoscopic cholecystectomy, with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and sphincterotomy reserved for patients unfit for cholecystectomy and those with biliary sepsis. Results: 249 patients were identified of whom 36 (14.5%) underwent ERCP and sphincterotomy as definitive treatment. 96 patients with a non-dilated CBD and normal or resolving liver function tests proceeded to laparosocopic cholecystectomy and intraoperative cholangiogram (IOC), 8 (8.5%) of whom had CBD stones intraoperatively. Eleven patients underwent cholecystectomy during pancreatic necrosectomy. Of those undergoing preoperative diagnostic biliary tract imaging, ERCP was undertaken in 57 patients and MRCP in 49 patients. There was no significant difference in serum bilirubin levels [ERCP 43 mmol/l (18–204) vs. MRCP 39 mmol/l (24–180), p = NS] or the proportion of patients with CBD stones [ERCP 10 (17.5%) vs. MRCP 7 (14.2%), p = NS] between the two groups. Patients who underwent MRCP had a shorter median hospital stay [MRCP 5 days (range: 3–14) vs. ERCP 9 days (range: 4–20), p < 0.01] and higher rate of cholecystectomy during the index admission (MRCP 83.3% vs. ERCP 67.2%, p < 0.05). There was a high degree of correlation between preoperative MRCP results and findings of subsequent IOC or therapeutic ERCP (area under ROC curve: 0.94). Conclusions: MRCP is an accurate modality for imaging the axial biliary tree in patients with AGP. Selective use of MRCP reduces the need for ERCP and results in shorter hospital Stay.