Cervical Cancer Screening Results Research Articles

Assessing Management of Abnormal Cervical Cancer Screening Results and Concordance with Guideline Recommendations in Three US Healthcare Settings.

Follow-up of abnormal results is essential to cervical cancer screening, but data on adherence to follow-up are limited. We describe patterns of follow-up after screening abnormalities and identify predictors of guideline-concordant follow-up. We identified the index screening abnormality (positive human papillomavirus [HPV] test or atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance [ASC-US] or more severe cytology) among women 25-65 years old at three U.S. healthcare systems during 2010-2019. We estimated the cumulative incidence of surveillance testing, colposcopy, or treatment after the index abnormality and initial colposcopy. Logistic regressions were fit to identify predictors of guideline-concordant follow-up according to contemporaneous guidelines. Among 43,007 patients with an index abnormality, the cumulative incidence of any follow-up was 49.6% by 4 years for those with ASC-US/HPV-negative and higher for abnormalities warranting immediate colposcopy. The 1-year cumulative incidence of any follow-up after colposcopy was 70% for patients with normal results or cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) I and 90% for patients with CIN II+. Rates of concordant follow-up after screening and colposcopy were 52% and 47%. Discordant follow-up was associated with factors including age, race/ethnicity, overweight/obese BMI, and specific types of public payor coverage or being uninsured. Adherence to recommended follow-up of cytologic and histopathologic abnormalities is inconsistent in clinical practice. Concordance was poor for mild abnormalities and improved, though suboptimal, for more severe abnormalities. There remain gaps in the cervical cancer screening process in clinical practice. Further work is needed to understand barriers to appropriate management of cervical abnormalities.

Cervical cancer screening outcomes for HIV-positive women in the Lubombo and Manzini regions of Eswatini-Prevalence and predictors of a positive visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) screen.

This study aimed to describe the prevalence and predictors of a positive VIA (visual inspection with acetic acid) cervical cancer screening test in women living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). We retrospectively analysed data from women aged ≥15 who accessed VIA screening from health facilities in the Lubombo and Manzini regions of Eswatini. Sociodemographic and clinical data from October 2020 to June 2023 were extracted from the client management information system (CMIS). VIA screening outcome was categorised into negative, positive, or suspicious. A logistic regression model estimated the adjusted odds ratio (AOR) of the predictors of a positive VIA screen at p<0.05 with 95% confidence intervals. Of 23,657 participants, 60.8% (n = 14,397) were from the Manzini region. The mean age was 33.3 years (standard deviation 7.0), and 33% (n = 7,714) were first-time screens. The prevalence of a positive VIA was 2.6% (95% CI: 2.2%, 3.0%): 2.8% (95% CI: 2.2%, 3.5%) in Lubombo and 2.4% (95% CI: 2.0%, 2.9%) in Manzini (p = 0.096). Screening at mission-owned (AOR 1.40; p = 0.001), NGO-owned (AOR 3.08; p<0.001) and industrial/workplace-owned health facilities (AOR 2.37; p = 0.044) were associated with increased odds of a positive VIA compared to government-owned health facilities. Compared to those aged 25-34, the odds of a positive VIA increased by 1.26 for those in the 35-44 age group (AOR 1.26; p = 0.017). Predictors with lower odds for a positive VIA test were: being on anti-retroviral therapy (ART) for 5-9 years (AOR 0.76; p = 0.004) and ≥10 years (AOR 0.66; p = 0.002) compared to <5 years; and having an undetectable viral load (AOR 0.39; p<0.001) compared to unsuppressed. Longer duration on ART and an undetectable viral load reduced the odds, while middle-aged women and screening at non-public health facilities increased the odds of a positive VIA screen.

Epidemiological Profile of Human Papillomavirus in a Healthcare Center in Portugal: Implications for Public Health Policies.

Introduction Human papillomavirus (HPV) infection, a prevalent sexually transmitted disease, affects the majority of sexually active individuals at least once in their lifetime. Cervical cancer stands as a significant contributor to mortality among women. Cervical cancer screening (CCS) and HPV vaccination are recent, with few studies about their impact on the prevalence of HPV types. The emergence of novel predominant pathogen strains can be driven by vaccine-induced pathogen strain replacement, thereby enhancing and altering selection. Objective The aim of the study was to characterize the high-risk (HR) HPV infection in two Portuguese primary care units (PCUs). Materials and methods In this observational, cross-sectional, and descriptive study, we included women aged 25-64 years and registered in two PCUs, who were screened by SiiMA Rastreios (population-based screening management application), and were HR-HPV positive, between August 2015 and May 2018. The results of cervical cancer screening (CCS) can be accessed through the SiiMA Rastreios information system. For data treatment, we used MS Excel (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, Washington, USA), IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 20 (Released 2011; IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, USA), and non-parametric tests. Results In our study, we included 4,614 women aged between 25 and 64 years old. CCS was performed on 24.47%, of whom 39.95% were tested for HR-HPV. The infection rate was 18.85%, and all 14 types of infection were identified. The most common HPV type was 31, followed by 16 and 68. We found HPV other than 16/18 in 84.43%. We found coinfections in 34.1%, with no statistically significant difference by age group. In the 25-34 age group, the incidence of infection was 33.7% vs. 17.54% in the 35-54 age group and 4.55% in the 55-64 age group. HPV16 was the most common infection in the 25-34 age group. In nulliparous women, the most common was HPV31. The relationship between smoking habits and HR-HPV infection was statistically significant, but economic insufficiency was not. Conclusion The infection incidence in this study was slightly higher than in the 2011 national study. Statistically, the infection rate was significantly higher in the younger age groups. The most frequent type varied from the national and international study results. This may be due to regional differences in HPV infection, changes in the pattern of incidence, or the effect of vaccination. The HPV pattern may be changing, so the scientific community must keep updated to develop increasingly efficient screening and vaccination programs.

Lives Saved Through Increasing Adherence to Follow-Up After Abnormal Cervical Cancer Screening Results.

To model the potential number of cancers prevented and life-years saved over a range of adherence rates to cervical cancer screening, surveillance follow-up, and follow-up colposcopy that may result from removing financial barriers to these essential clinical services. A previously validated decision-analytic Markov microsimulation model was used to evaluate the increase in adherence to screening, surveillance, and colposcopy after an abnormal cervical cancer screening result. For each incremental increase in adherence, we modeled the number of cervical cancer cases avoided, the stages at which the cancers were detected, the number of cervical cancer deaths avoided, and the number of life-years gained. Compared with current adherence rates, the model estimated that an optimized scenario of perfect screening, surveillance, and colposcopy adherence per 100,000 women currently eligible for screening in the United States was 128 (95% CI, 66-199) fewer cervical cancers detected (23%), 62 (95% CI, 7-120) fewer cervical cancer deaths (20%), and 2,135 (95% CI, 1,363-3,057) more life-years saved. Sensitivity analysis revealed that any increase in adherence led to clinically meaningful health benefits. The consequences of not attending routine screening or follow-up after an abnormal cervical cancer screening result are associated with preventable cervical cancer morbidity and premature mortality. Given the potential for the removal of consumer cost sharing to increase the use of necessary follow-up after abnormal screening results and to ultimately reduce cervical cancer morbidity and mortality, public and private payers should remove cost barriers to these essential services.

Abstract C124: Racial and ethnic disparities in follow-up of abnormal cervical cancer screening results

Abstract Background: Despite well-defined practice guidelines for management of abnormal cervical cancer (CC) screening results, the incidence of CC is disproportionately higher in Black and Hispanic women compared to White women. Black women experience the highest overall CC mortality rates, irrespective of subtype or stage. Disparities in CC prevention may be related to differential follow-up of abnormal CC screening and delays in CC diagnosis. In a cohort of primarily Black and Hispanic patients, we investigated racial and ethnic disparities in factors associated with colposcopy attendance following abnormal CC screening. Methods: In a large urban OB/GYN clinic in Connecticut, clinical and demographic medical record data was collected for patients with abnormal CC screening results from 2/2021 to 1/2022. Factors related to colposcopy completion were examined for colposcopy indicated patients. In univariate and multivariate analysis (SAS 9.4), we analyzed the relationship between clinical and demographic characteristics and key junctures in the colposcopy referral and completion cascade. Colposcopy scheduling outcomes were compared by race/ethnicity using the Mann-Whitney U test. Analyses of race/ethnicity were stratified by primary language spoken (non-Hispanic Black, Hispanic English-speaking, Hispanic Spanish-speaking, and White/Other). Results: Of the 248 patients indicated for colposcopy, 44% identified as Black, 39% identified as Hispanic, and 18% identified as White/Other. Among Hispanic patients, 62% spoke English and 38% spoke Spanish as their primary language. The majority of colposcopy indicated patients were publicly insured by Medicare or Medicaid. Colposcopy appointments were attended by 86.7% (215) of indicated patients, with 63.3% (157) attending within the guideline recommended interval of 8 weeks from CC screening for high-grade cytology and 90 days for low-grade cytology. In univariate analysis, colposcopy attendance was significantly lower in Black vs. White/Other patients (p&amp;lt;0.05). Multivariate analysis also showed that Black patients experienced the greatest disparity in colposcopy attendance, followed by Hispanic English-speaking patients (p&amp;lt;0.01). Although rates of guideline-concordant colposcopy attendance were lowest in Black and Hispanic English-speaking patients, these differences were not significant as guideline-concordant completion rates decreased across all groups. No significant relationships were found between race/ethnicity and the number of cancellations, no shows, or reschedules of colposcopy appointments. Conclusions: Although we identified significant differences in colposcopy attendance across race/ethnicity, there were no significant differences in guideline-concordant colposcopy attendance or appointment scheduling outcomes related to delays in colposcopy (i.e. cancellation, no show, or reschedule). Future studies on colposcopy delays will focus on multi-level factors that may disproportionately burden racial/ethnic minority groups and lead to disparities in follow-up of abnormal CC screening results. Citation Format: Anisha V. Patel, Guangyu Tong, Beth A. Jones, Raul U. Hernandez-Ramirez, Wanyi Tang, Sarah Megiel, Abigail Girgis, Jamie Foster, Donna Spiegelman, Sangini S. Sheth. Racial and ethnic disparities in follow-up of abnormal cervical cancer screening results [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 16th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2023 Sep 29-Oct 2;Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2023;32(12 Suppl):Abstract nr C124.

Status of common sexually transmitted infection in population referred for colposcopy and correlation with human papillomavirus infection

BackgroundTo investigate the prevalence of common sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and the association of STI/human papillomavirus co-infection in young and middle-aged women with previous abnormal cervical findings referred for colposcopy.Methods719 cervical-swab cytobrush specimens were obtained from women aged ≤ 50 years who were referred for colposcopy at Peking University First Hospital due to previous abnormal cervical findings. HPV 21 typing and a panel of pathogenic STIs were tested for using the 21 HPV GenoArray Diagnostic Kit (HBGA-21PKG; HybriBio, Ltd., Chaozhou, China) and a nucleic acid STI detection kit (HybriBio Ltd. Guangzhou, China), after which colposcopy with multipoint positioning biopsy was performed.ResultsThe overall prevalence of STIs among HPV positive women with previous abnormal cervical cancer screening results was 63.7% (458/719), with Ureaplasma parvum serovar 3, Ureaplasma parvum serovar 6 and herpes simplex virus type 2 having significantly higher prevalence among high-risk HPV positive patients (19.3%, Χ2 = 5.725, P = 0.018; 21.5%, Χ2 = 4.439, P = 0.035; 5.7%, Χ2 = 4.184, P = 0.048). Among patients positive for the high-risk human papillomavirus, the prevalence of Neisseria gonorrhoeae infection in human papillomavirus 16/18 positive patients was significantly higher than that in other patients (2.5%, Χ2 = 4.675; P = 0.043). Histopathologically, Chlamydia trachomatis infection was more frequently detected in lower than or equal to low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion infection status (13.0%, Χ2 = 3.368; P = 0.041).ConclusionsThe high prevalence of HPV coinfection with other sexually transmitted pathogens, particularly Ureaplasma parvum serovar 3, Ureaplasma parvum serovar 6, and herpes simplex virus type 2, calls for routine STI screening and effective STI prevention and management in patients with abnormal cervical cancer screening results.

Telomerase reverse transcriptase gene polymorphisms and cervical cancer susceptibility in high-risk human papillomavirus-infected women.

To investigate the relationship between Human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) gene polymorphisms and the susceptibility and clinicopathological parameters of cervical cancer in women infected with high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV). A total of 380 patients with HPV-infected cervical cancer who were admitted to the Jilin province Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital (Jilin province Obstetrics Quality Control Center) from July 2019 to July 2023 were selected as case group, and 408 women with negative HPV results in the cervical cancer screening results of the physical examination in the same hospital were selected as the control group. Restriction fragment length polymorphisms polymerase chain reaction was used to detect the polymorphisms of hTERT, and its relationship with the susceptibility to high-risk HPV infection and clinicopathological parameters in patients with cervical cancer was analysed. Individuals carrying the GA and AA genotypes of rs2736122 were significantly associated with an increased risk of cervical cancer when compared with the GG genotype and the adjusted ORs were 0.53 (0.37-0.79) for the AA genotype and 0.73 (0.59-0.88) for the A allele genotype. Besides, GG genotype or G allele of rs2853677 presented a significant influence on cervical cancer, with ORs of 0.59 (0.41-0.86) and 10.77 (0.63-0.94), respectively, when compared with the AA genotype. And rs2853677 have statistically significant difference in tumour diameter and degree of differentiation subgroup(p < 0.05). The results of this study indicate that the hTERT gene rs2736122AA and rs2853677 GG genotypes can increase the susceptibility of high-risk HPV infection in cervical cancer patients. And rs2853677 is related to tumours above 4 cm and highly differentiated tumours. But both have nothing to do with the patient's chemotherapy sensitivity.

A Multilevel Primary Care Intervention to Improve Follow-Up of Overdue Abnormal Cancer Screening Test Results

Realizing the benefits of cancer screening requires testing of eligible individuals and processes to ensure follow-up of abnormal results. To test interventions to improve timely follow-up of overdue abnormal breast, cervical, colorectal, and lung cancer screening results. Pragmatic, cluster randomized clinical trial conducted at 44 primary care practices within 3 health networks in the US enrolling patients with at least 1 abnormal cancer screening test result not yet followed up between August 24, 2020, and December 13, 2021. Automated algorithms developed using data from electronic health records (EHRs) recommended follow-up actions and times for abnormal screening results. Primary care practices were randomized in a 1:1:1:1 ratio to (1) usual care, (2) EHR reminders, (3) EHR reminders and outreach (a patient letter was sent at week 2 and a phone call at week 4), or (4) EHR reminders, outreach, and navigation (a patient letter was sent at week 2 and a navigator outreach phone call at week 4). Patients, physicians, and practices were unblinded to treatment assignment. The primary outcome was completion of recommended follow-up within 120 days of study enrollment. The secondary outcomes included completion of recommended follow-up within 240 days of enrollment and completion of recommended follow-up within 120 days and 240 days for specific cancer types and levels of risk. Among 11 980 patients (median age, 60 years [IQR, 52-69 years]; 64.8% were women; 83.3% were White; and 15.4% were insured through Medicaid) with an abnormal cancer screening test result for colorectal cancer (8245 patients [69%]), cervical cancer (2596 patients [22%]), breast cancer (1005 patients [8%]), or lung cancer (134 patients [1%]) and abnormal test results categorized as low risk (6082 patients [51%]), medium risk (3712 patients [31%]), or high risk (2186 patients [18%]), the adjusted proportion who completed recommended follow-up within 120 days was 31.4% in the EHR reminders, outreach, and navigation group (n = 3455), 31.0% in the EHR reminders and outreach group (n = 2569), 22.7% in the EHR reminders group (n = 3254), and 22.9% in the usual care group (n = 2702) (adjusted absolute difference for comparison of EHR reminders, outreach, and navigation group vs usual care, 8.5% [95% CI, 4.8%-12.0%], P < .001). The secondary outcomes showed similar results for completion of recommended follow-up within 240 days and by subgroups for cancer type and level of risk for the abnormal screening result. A multilevel primary care intervention that included EHR reminders and patient outreach with or without patient navigation improved timely follow-up of overdue abnormal cancer screening test results for breast, cervical, colorectal, and lung cancer. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03979495.

Cervical cancer screening outcomes in public health facilities in three states in Nigeria

BackgroundCervical cancer continues to generate a significant burden of disease and death in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Lack of awareness and poor access to early screening and pre-cancer treatment contribute to the high mortality. We describe here cervical cancer screening outcomes in public health facilities in three states in Nigeria.MethodsWe conducted an observational study in 177 government health facilities in Lagos, Kaduna, and Rivers State, Nigeria from January to December 2021, in which we reviewed programmatic data collected through the newly introduced Cervical Cancer Prevention Program. Women who received screening and provided consent were enrolled into the study. Data were extracted from registers in the health facilities using SurveyCTO and descriptive statistical analysis was conducted using StataSE 15 (StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA).ResultsEighty-three thousand, five hundred ninety-three women were included in the analysis including 6,043 (7%) WLHIV. 67,371 (81%) received VIA as their primary screening while 16,173 (19%) received HPV DNA testing, with 49 (< 1%) receiving both at the same time. VIA positivity was 7% for WLHIV and 3% for general population, while HPV prevalence was 16% for WLHIV and 8% for general population. Following a positive HPV result, 21% of women referred, completed triage examination. 96% of women identified with precancerous lesions, received treatment. 44% of women with suspected cancer were successfully referred to an oncology center for advanced treatment. Following treatment with thermal ablation, seven adverse events were reported.ConclusionsThe Program has successfully increased women’s access to screening and treatment of precancerous lesions. Almost all women who were eligible for pre-cancerous lesion treatment received it, often on the same day when screened using VIA. However, for women referred for a triage exam or due to suspected cancer, many did not complete their referral visits. More effort is required to ensure HPV positive women and women with suspected cancer are adequately linked to care to further reduce morbidity and mortality associated with cervical cancer in Nigeria. Implementation studies should be conducted to provide insights to improve the utilization of the existing centralized and point of care (POC) platforms to facilitate same day results, and to improve triage and treatment rates.

Correlates of cervical cancer prevention advocacy and cervical cancer screening in Uganda: Cross-sectional evaluation of a conceptual model.

An approach to increasing cervical cancer (CC) screening is to empower women who have been screened to act as advocates and encourage other women they know to get screened. We examined correlates of CC screening advocacy and CC screening uptake among constructs in our conceptual model of factors driving engagement in advocacy. A cross-sectional, correlational analysis was conducted with survey data from 40 women (index participants) who had recently screened for CC, and 103 female members of their social network (alter participants) who had not been screened. Variables measured included CC prevention advocacy, as well as internalized CC stigma, sharing of CC screening result, CC knowledge, healthy bodily intake (i.e., diet; alcohol and cigarette use) and self-efficacy related to CC service utilization and CC prevention advocacy, which were hypothesized to be associated with advocacy. Bivariate and multivariable regression analyses, controlling for clustering, were conducted. Among index participants, greater engagement in advocacy was positively correlated with CC knowledge, sharing of CC screening result, and CC service utilization self-efficacy. Women who had screened positive and received treatment for precancerous lesions reported greater CC prevention advocacy, CC knowledge and healthy living, compared to those who screened negative. In multiple regression analyses, CC screening was positively associated with CC prevention advocacy and being age 36 or older, and CC prevention advocacy was also positively associated with CC service utilization self-efficacy. These findings support the validity of our conceptual model regarding factors associated with engagement in CC prevention advocacy among women screened for CC. The strong association between CC prevention advocacy and both CC screening uptake and CC service utilization self-efficacy suggests the potential value of advocacy promotion among women who have been screened, as well as for increasing screening uptake.

The Effect of Shared Decision-making on Decision Self-efficacy and Decisional Conflict of Women with Low-grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion in Cervical Cytology: An Experimental Study

Background: Women often face decisional challenges and hesitation while choosing the appropriate method to follow up on their abnormal results of cervix cytology. Objective: The present study aimed to determine the effect of shared decision-making (SDM) on decision self-efficacy (DSE) and decisional conflict (DC) about follow-up methods among women with abnormal cervix cytology results. Methods: This interventional study was performed on 54 women referred to the subspecialty clinic of gynecologic oncology. The women were assigned into intervention and control groups using a randomized block design with block sizes of 4 and 6 and an allocation ratio of 1:1. The intervention group received counseling based on the SDM and a decision aid (DA) booklet. The data collection tools included the questionnaires of the demographic and obstetrics characteristics, DC, DSE, and Decision Regret. The collected data were analyzed using SPSS24 software, and independent t-tests and ANCOVA were used. Results: After the intervention, the total mean score of the DC in the intervention group was significantly lower than that in the control group [MD: -22.84 with 95% CI: -23.52 to -21.95, (P &lt;0.001)]. The mean score of DSE in the intervention group was significantly higher than that in the control group [MD: 14.56 with 95% CI: 21.47 to 7.65, (P &lt;0.001)]. Conclusion: The present study results indicated that counseling based on the SDM effectively promotes DSE and reduces DC among women with minor abnormal cervical cytology. Therefore, it is recommended that healthcare providers use SDM for women with abnormal cervical cancer screening results.

The Pap Hub: A Novel Centralized System for Cervical Cancer Screening and Prevention

Summary Complex guidelines for managing the results of cervical cancer screening create specific challenges in ensuring appropriate follow-up for patients. The authors describe the development and implementation of a centralized Pap Hub system for the real-time coordination of up-to-date cervical cancer screening and follow-up at HealthPartners in Minnesota. Preliminary review of 8-year trends in screening rates under the Pap Hub shows an overall improvement in screening rates that exceeded the national average. The review also demonstrated that despite an overall improvement in screening rates in the population, there exist and remain disparities between white patients and patients of color. Qualitative review of the end-user experience with the Pap Hub showed a high degree of satisfaction for both patients and providers in coordination of cervical cancer screening and follow-up.

ACCEPTANCE AND OUTCOMES OF CERVICAL CANCER SCREENING AMONG WOMEN OF NORTH INDIA

Cervical cancer is one of the preventable cancer, still it is fourth leading cause of death of women worldwide and second leading cause of death of women in India. Screening for cervical cancer using high performance test and vaccination against HPV(Human papilloma virus) are recommended by WHO as global strategy to eliminate cervical cancer. The very rst indigenous vaccine CERVAVAC is also launched in India in year 2023,however data from nationally representative survey(NFHS-5) showed very low awareness and acceptance of cervical cancer screening among women. Present study is a descriptive cross sectional study done in camp based settings (25-30 women in each camps) from November 2021 to november 2022 at peripheral health centers of Lucknow district of state Uttar Pradesh of North India. Aim of the study was to assess the acceptance and outcomes of cervical cancer screening among ASHA(accredited social health activist) from health centers and women visiting peripheral health centers. Result showed that total 43% women accepted screening(41.4% ASHA, 31.4% women visiting health center). On bivariate analysis education level(p=0.003 ), employment status (p&lt;0.001)and knowledge of cervical cancer(p=0.02) found to be predictors of cervical cancer screening. Liquid based cytology test was carried to screen those who were willing and it was found that as per Bethesda system of classication among those who opted for screening(N=110), 4(3.1%) were having ASCUS (Atypical squamous cells of undetermined signicance), 2(1.5%) had LSIL (low squamous intraepithelial lesions), 4(3.1%) reported to have HSIL (High squamous intraepithelial lesion), 9 (7.7%) had non neoplastic inammation, 93(84.6%) were negative for any neoplastic or non- neoplastic lesion. All Positive screened participants were referred to higher centre for further management.

Uptake of a Cervical Cancer Clinical Decision Support Tool: A Mixed-Methods Study.

Clinical decision support (CDS) tools that provide point-of-care reminders of patients' care needs may improve rates of guideline-concordant cervical cancer screening. However, uptake of such electronic health record (EHR)-based tools in primary care practices is often low. This study describes the frequency of factors associated with, and barriers and facilitators to adoption of a cervical cancer screening CDS tool (CC-tool) implemented in a network of community health centers. This mixed-methods sequential explanatory study reports on CC-tool use among 480 community-based clinics, located across 18 states. Adoption of the CC-tool was measured as any instance of tool use (i.e., entry of cervical cancer screening results or follow-up plan) and as monthly tool use rates from November 1, 2018 (tool release date) to December 31, 2020. Adjusted odds and rates of tool use were evaluated using logistic and negative-binomial regression. Feedback from nine clinic staff representing six clinics during user-centered design sessions and semi-structured interviews with eight clinic staff from two additional clinics were conducted to assess barriers and facilitators to tool adoption. The CC-tool was used ≥1 time in 41% of study clinics during the analysis period. Clinics that ever used the tool and those with greater monthly tool use had, on average, more encounters, more patients from households at >138% federal poverty level, fewer pediatric encounters, higher up-to-date cervical cancer screening rates, and higher rates of abnormal cervical cancer screening results. Qualitative data indicated barriers to tool adoption, including lack of knowledge of the tool's existence, understanding of its functionalities, and training on its use. Without effective systems for informing users about new EHR functions, new or updated EHR tools are unlikely to be widely adopted, reducing their potential to improve health care quality and outcomes.

Outcomes of cervical cancer screening among vaccinated and unvaccinated women against papillomavirus: a study protocol and preliminary data in the metropolitan area of palermo

Outcomes of cervical cancer screening among vaccinated and unvaccinated women against papillomavirus: a study protocol and preliminary data in the metropolitan area of palermo

Associations of human papillomavirus genotypes and cervical vascular abnormality in a cohort of women underwent colposcopy, a retrospective study of 6716 patients.

Abnormal vessel patterns are specific signs in patients with early cervical abnormality and cervical cancer(CC) by colposcopy, but the impact of human papillomavirus (HPV) infections on abnormal vessel patterns remains unknown. A total of 6716 female patients with HPV infections or cytological abnormalities who underwent a colposcopy following abnormal CC screening results were included in the study. The final pathological diagnosis was confirmed to be the most severe pathological grade across cervical biopsy, endocervical canal curettage (ECC) and conization. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to investigate the association between HPV infections and abnormal vessel patterns, adjusting for age, gravidity and parity. There were 6124 normal vascular cases by colposcopy and 592 cases with cervical vascular abnormality. The prevalence of HPV infections was 4284 (70%) in normal patients, and the prevalence of HPV infections was 479 (80%) in cervical vascular abnormality patients. HPV high-risk type 16 infection alone increased the risk of cervical heteromorphic blood vessels (aOR=3.66, 95%CI: 2.54~5.27). HPV 16 and 33 alone (other than the commonly recognized subtype of 18) or coinfection of these two genotypes could increase the risk of cervical punctate vascular and cervical vascular mosaic features and abnormal cervical blood vessels. An increased risk of abnormal cervical lesions was observed for HPV 16 and 33 alone or combined in coinfection compared to the negative group. The risk of cervical vascular abnormality was increased 10-fold by coinfection with HPV 16 and 33 (aOR=10.67, 95% CI: 4.54~25.09, P<0.001). HPV 16, 33 alone or combined in coinfection were associated with an increased risk of lesions more advanced than high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) when compared to the negative group. The risk of lesions more advanced than HSIL was up to 26-fold higher in the coinfection with HPV 16 and 33 group than in the negative group (aOR=26.23, 95%CI: 11.23~61.27, P<0.001). HPV16 and 33 are the most dangerous HPV genotypes correlated with abnormal vascular patterns. Combined HPV16 and HPV33 infection increases the risk of abnormal vascular patterns. Combined HPV16 and HPV33 infection increases the risk of developing HSIL+.

Acceptability of integration of cervical cancer screening into routine HIV care, associated factors and perceptions among HIV-infected women: a mixed methods study at Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital, Uganda

BackgroundIntegrating cervical cancer screening into routine Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) care has been endorsed as an effective strategy for increasing uptake of cervical cancer screening, facilitating early detection and treatment of pre-cancerous lesions among HIV-infected women. In Uganda, this strategy has not been implemented yet in most HIV clinics. Assessing acceptability of this intervention among HIV-infected women is of great relevance to inform implementation. We assessed acceptability of integration of cervical cancer screening into routine HIV care, associated factors and perceptions among HIV-infected women enrolled in the HIV clinic at Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital.MethodologyA mixed methods study utilizing explanatory sequential approach was conducted among 327 eligible HIV-infected women. Acceptability of integration of cervical cancer screening into routine HIV care was measured based on Theoretical Framework of Acceptability. Quantitative data was collected using a pre-tested questionnaire. We conducted focus group discussions to explore perceptions regarding the intervention among purposively selected HIV-infected women. Modified Poisson regression with robust variance analysis was utilized to determine factors associated with acceptability of the intervention. Statistical significance was determined at p-value <0.05. Thematic analysis utilizing inductive coding was applied to analyse qualitative data.ResultsThe majority of HIV-infected women (64.5%) accepted integration of cervical cancer screening into routine HIV care. Religion, perceived risk of developing cervical cancer and ever screened for cervical cancer were statistically significantly associated with acceptability of integration of cervical cancer screening into routine HIV care. Perceived benefits of the proposed intervention were: convenience to seek for cervical cancer screening, motivation to undergo cervical cancer screening, improved archiving of cervical cancer screening results, confidentiality of HIV patient information, and preference to interact with HIV clinic health workers. Shame to expose their privacy to HIV clinic health workers and increased waiting time were the only perceived challenges of the integrated strategy.ConclusionStudy findings highlight the need to take advantage of this acceptability to prioritize implementation of integration of cervical cancer screening into routine HIV care. HIV-infected women should be reassured of confidentiality and reduced waiting time to increase uptake of integrated cervical cancer screening and HIV services among HIV-infected women along the continuum of HIV care and treatment services.

Knowledge Beliefs and Barriers of Healthcare Workers about Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) and HPV Vaccination

Background/Purpose: HPV vaccine is critical in the primary prevention of HPV infection and related diseases. HPV vaccination alone reduces HPV infection by 70% and cervical cancer by 48%. Healthcare workers are expected to have sufficient knowledge and positive attitudes and behaviours about the HPV vaccine. This study aimed to determine the knowledge level of healthcare workers about HPV and HPV vaccination and their beliefs and barriers towards HPV vaccination. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 339 healthcare workers were reached by snowball sampling. Sociodemographic form, 'Human Papilloma Virus Knowledge Scale (HPV-KS)', 'Health Belief Model Scale for Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) and Its Vaccination (HBMS-HPVV)' were applied online. Results: 254 female (74.9%) and 85 male (25.1%) healthcare workers participated in this study, and 60.5% of the participants were physicians. 94.4% of participants have heard of the HPV vaccine. The most frequently consulted information sources are specialist physicians (57%), social media/TV/Websites (24.4%), and other health workers (23.7%). Twenty-six participants (7.7%) have had at least one dose of the HPV vaccine, and 58% completed three doses. 6.7% of the participants having daughters, and 0.7% of those having sons vaccinated their children against HPV. Women who have had HPV screening (p=0.016), HPV positive results (p=0.033) and pathological cervical cancer screening results (p=0.004), those having 1st-degree relatives or close friends who had HPV vaccine (p

Practical application of modified ASCCP 2019 algorithms in the diagnosis and early detection of cervical pathology.

We assessed the risk for the high-grade precancerous CIN 2 (+) in women with HSIL and ASC-H depending on HPV status. A retrospective analysis of results of cervical cancer screening following the current ASCCP recommendations by co-testing (LBC and molecular HPV DNA HR) performed between 2018 and 2022 in the Laboratory of Cervical Pathology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Poznan University of Medical Sciences. Patient ages ranged from 22 to 72 years. The analysis of abnormal results of liquid-based cytology revealed the following: 1 suspicion of cervical carcinoma, 49 HSIL, 97 ASC-H, 95 LSIL, 92 ASCUS, and 4 AGC cases. Histopathological verification of the biopsy samples revealed a total of 288 abnormal results. CIN 2 (+) lesions were found in 127 women. ASC-H was the most common abnormal cytologic finding. Of the 338 molecular test results for HPV DNA HR, 85% were confirmed positive. A positive molecular signal confirming the presence of human papillomavirus on PAP smear was not homonymous with simultaneous histopathological diagnosis of cervical pathology. There is a high risk for CIN 2 (+) in patients with HSIL and HPV 16 (+) and/or HPV DNA HR (+), as well as ASC-H and HPV 16 (+). HSIL is rarely observed in women with HPV 16 (-). The risk for CIN 2 (+) in women with ASC-H and HPV (-) is low.

Consensus Guidelines for the Management of Abnormal Cervical Cancer Screening Tests by the SPCPTGI

Cervical cancer is one of the most common types of cancer in women. Cervical cancer screening is needed for the detection and treatment of cervical neoplastic lesions that can evolve to neoplasia and to reduce the incidence of cervical cancer. Recently, changes were made to increase the efficiency of the screening process such as employing the human papilloma virus detection test as the gold standard for cervical cancer screening and acknowledging the importance of adapting clinical practice to consider the risk of developing this neoplasia. Considering this paradigm shift, new clinical practice guidelines are now needed. For this purpose, a group of experts analyzed and discussed the most recent literature, defining recommendations and proposing clinical practice guidelines that focus on risk stratification, diagnostic evaluation, and on the therapeutical approach and follow-up of women with altered screening results. The aim of this article is to guide clinical practice regarding actions to take in face of altered results of cervical cancer screening and, consequently, to improve the secondary prevention of this condition.