Restrictive Transfusion Protocol Research Articles

Prevalence and factors influencing anemia recovery after intensive care

BackgroundAnemia is associated with adverse outcomes and prolonged hospitalizations in critically ill patients. Regarding the recent adoption of restrictive transfusion protocols in intensive care unit (ICU) management, anemia remains highly prevalent even after ICU discharge. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of anemia following ICU discharge and factors affecting recovery from anemia. MethodsIn this retrospective cohort study involving 3969 adult ICU survivors, we assessed anemia severity using the National Cancer Institute criteria at six time points: ICU admission, ICU discharge, hospital discharge, and at 3-, 6-, and 12-month post-hospital discharge. In addition, baseline characteristics, including age, sex, comorbidities, and recent iron supplementation or erythropoietin administration, were evaluated. ResultsOur findings revealed an in-hospital mortality rate of 28.6%. The median hospital and ICU stays were 20 and 5 days, respectively, with common comorbidities including hypertension, and diabetes mellitus (DM). Among the patients, the hemoglobin levels of 3967 patients were confirmed at the time of discharge from the ICU, representing 99.95% of the total. The prevalence of anemia persisted post- ICU discharge; less than 30% of patients recovered, whereas 13.6% of them experienced worsening of anemia post-ICU discharge. Factors contributing to anemia severity were female sex, DM, chronic renal failure, malignant solid tumors, and administration of iron supplements. ConclusionsThis study highlighted the need for targeted interventions to manage anemia post-ICU discharge and suggested potential factors that influence recovery from anemia.

The Hidden Risks of Perioperative Transfusions in Traumatic Lower Extremity Free Flap Reconstruction.

Blood transfusions have been associated with surgical complications; however, these studies are not specific to lower extremity (LE) reconstruction. We evaluated the effect of perioperative packed red blood cell (PRBC) transfusions on LE free flap outcomes in trauma patients. Patients undergoing LE free flap reconstruction following acute injuries from 2016 to 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. The perioperative period for transfusions was defined as ± 3 days from the procedure. Parameters included demographics, perioperative characteristics, and outcomes. Major complications were complications requiring reoperation. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify associations. Of the 205 patients, 48% received PRBCs perioperatively. There was a trend toward higher major complications rate in the transfusion group (19 vs. 10%, p = 0.09). Wound size, injury severity score (ISS), and intraoperative estimated blood loss were greater in the transfusion group (p < 0.01). Preoperative hemoglobin/hematocrit were lower in the transfusion group (p < 0.001). Units of PRBCs transfused were independently associated with major complications on multivariate analysis (odds ratio [OR] = 1.34, confidence interval [CI]: 1.06-1.70, p = 0.015) and length of hospital stay (LOS; OR = 1.05, CI: 1.02-1.08, p = 0.002). Infection, wound size, ISS, and preoperative hemoglobin/hematocrit were independently associated with increased LOS (p < 0.05) but not with major complications. The number of units of PRBCs given perioperatively was the only variable independently associated with major complications on multivariate analysis and was one of many variables associated with increased LOS. These findings suggest the usage of restrictive transfusion protocols in trauma patients requiring LE reconstruction.

Trauma

The February 2024 Trauma Roundup360 looks at: Posterior malleolus fractures: what about medium-sized fragments?; Acute or delayed total hip arthroplasty after acetabular fracture fixation?; Intrawound antibiotics reduce the risk of deep infections in fracture fixation; Does the VANCO trial represent real world patients?; Can a restrictive transfusion protocol be effective beyond initial resuscitation?; What risk factors result in avascular necrosis of the talus?; Pre-existing anxiety and mood disorders have a role to play in complex regional pain syndrome; Three- and four-part proximal humeral fractures at ten years.

Red Blood Cell Transfusion Practice Pattern Before and After Implementation of a Local Restrictive Transfusion Protocol in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit

Background: A restrictive red blood cell (RBC) transfusion guideline was established in 2019 in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), suggesting a hemoglobin concentration threshold of 7 g/dL. Objectives: (a) To determine its impact on the number of RBC transfusions and donor exposure; (b) to characterize RBC-transfusion determinants and justifications. Study Design: Single-center retrospective historical control study comparing all neonates consecutively admitted to the NICU during two five-month periods: 401 patients in 2013 before and 402 patients in 2021 after restrictive guideline implementation. Possible determinants were assessed via logistic regressions and justifications via a questionnaire. Results: In 2021, 9.2% of neonates received at least one RBC transfusion compared to 13.5% in 2013 ( p = .075). Adherence to protocol thresholds was 50%. Implementation of a restrictive transfusion protocol had some impact on determinants related to neonatal morbidity and illness severity and some impact on justifications being mainly based on hemoglobin value. Conclusion: Our study demonstrates that the implementation of a restrictive RBC transfusion protocol tended to decrease transfusion rates and donor exposure in the NICU, but the trend was not statistically significant. Future work should focus on improving protocol adherence.

Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Patient Outcomes Following Restrictive Blood Transfusion Protocol.

To investigate the effect of a restrictive blood product utilization protocol on blood product utilization and clinical outcomes. We retrospectively reviewed all adult extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) patients from January 2019 to December 2021. The restrictive protocol, implemented in March 2020, was defined as transfusion of blood products for a hemoglobin level less than 7, platelet levels less than 50, and/or fibrinogen levels less than 100. Subgroup analysis was performed based on the mode of ECMO received: venoarterial ECMO, venovenous ECMO, and ECMO support following extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR). M Health Fairview University of Minnesota Medical Center. The study included 507 patients. One hundred fifty-one patients (29.9%) were placed on venoarterial ECMO, 70 (13.8%) on venovenous ECMO, and 286 (56.4%) on ECPR. For patients on venoarterial ECMO (48 [71.6%] vs. 52 [63.4%]; p = 0.374), venovenous ECMO (23 [63.9%] vs. 15 [45.5%]; p = 0.195), and ECPR (54 [50.0%] vs. 69 [39.2%]; p = 0.097), there were no significant differences in survival on ECMO. The last recorded mean hemoglobin value was also significantly decreased for venoarterial ECMO (8.10 [7.80-8.50] vs. 7.50 [7.15-8.25]; p = 0.001) and ECPR (8.20 [7.90-8.60] vs. 7.55 [7.10-8.88]; p < 0.001) following implementation of the restrictive transfusion protocol. These data suggest that a restrictive transfusion protocol is noninferior to ECMO patient survival. Additional, prospective randomized trials are required for further investigation of the safety of a restrictive transfusion protocol.

Differences in Prevalence of Transfusion Protocols between Critically Ill Neurologic and Non-Neurologic Patient Populations.

This study describes the prevalence of blood transfusion protocols in ICUs caring for neurologically vs. non-neurologically injured patients across a sample of US ICUs. This prospective, observational multi-center cohort study is a subgroup analysis of the USCIITG-CIOS, comprising 69 ICUs across the US (25 medical, 24 surgical, 20 mixed ICUs). Sixty-four ICUs were in teaching hospitals. A total of 6179 patients were enrolled, with 1266 (20.4%) having central nervous system (CNS) primary diagnoses. We evaluated whether CNS versus non-CNS diagnosis was associated with care in ICUs with restrictive transfusion protocols (RTPs) or massive transfusion protocols (MTPs) and whether CNS versus non-CNS diagnosis was associated with receiving blood products or colloids during the initial 24 h of care. Protocol utilization in CNS vs. non-CNS patients was as follows: RTPs-36.9% vs. 42.9% (p < 0.001); MTPs-48.3% vs. 47.4% (p = 0.57). Blood product transfusions in the first 24 h of ICU care (comparing CNS vs. non-CNS patients) were as follows: packed red blood cells-4.3% vs. 14.6% (p < 0.001); fresh frozen plasma-2.9% vs. 5.1% (p < 0.001); colloid blood products-3.2% vs. 9.2% (p < 0.001). In this cohort, we found differences in ICU utilization of RTPs, but not MTPs, when comparing where critically ill patients with neurologic versus non-neurologic primary diagnoses received ICU care.

Adverse postoperative outcomes associated with perioperative blood transfusion in gynecologic oncology surgery

ObjectiveTo examine the incidence of perioperative blood transfusion and association with 30 day postoperative outcomes in gynecologic cancer surgery.MethodsThe American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was...

Efficacy and safety of a restrictive blood transfusion protocol in gynecologic surgical patients

ObjectivesThis study sought to compare differences in blood transfusion and surgical complication rates before and after the implementation of a restrictive blood transfusion protocol. MethodsOn July 1, 2018, our institution implemented a restrictive blood transfusion protocol utilizing a hemoglobin trigger of less than 7 g/dL. Retrospective chart review was completed to review patients undergoing major abdominal surgery by the gynecology and gynecologic oncology services 18 months before, and after initiation of the transfusion protocol. Outcomes included number of patients, units transfused and postoperative complication rates. Complications included reoperation on the day of admission, surgical site infections, wound disruptions, pulmonary, renal, central nervous system, and cardiovascular complications, as well as deep venous thromboses, readmissions, and 30-day mortality. ResultsThere were 290 people in the pre- and 449 patients in the post-protocol group. A similar number of patients received blood transfusions in both groups (9.3% versus 10.6% p = 0.57). However, significantly fewer units of blood were given post-protocol initiation. For every patient who received a transfusion pre-protocol, 2.66 units were administered compared to 1.2 units after the protocol was initiated (p = 0.003). All postoperative complications were not significantly different between groups (p > 0.05). Individual postoperative complications were combined and analyzed using a clustered approach to detect rates of complications more conservatively. Both the 7-system (5.1% versus 4.9%, p = 0.90) and 8-system (5.5% versus 4.9%, p = 0.72) clustered analyses were not significantly different before and after the initiation of the transfusion protocol. ConclusionsA restrictive transfusion protocol is effective in decreasing the number of units of blood transfused without affecting postoperative complication rates in gynecologic surgery patients.

Adverse postoperative outcomes associated with perioperative blood transfusion in gynecologic oncology surgery: a National Surgical Quality Improvement Program analysis (467)

Adverse postoperative outcomes associated with perioperative blood transfusion in gynecologic oncology surgery: a National Surgical Quality Improvement Program analysis (467)

Simultaneous Bilateral Total Hip Arthroplasty With Contemporary Blood Management is Associated With a Low Risk of Allogeneic Blood Transfusion.

There is a paucity of data on blood loss and the risk of allogeneic blood transfusion after simultaneous bilateral total hip arthroplasty (SBTHA) with contemporary blood management including neuraxial anesthesia, routine tranexamic acid use, and a restrictive transfusion protocol. As such, we sought to determine the in-hospital outcomes of SBTHA, specifically analyzing blood loss and the rate and risk factors for transfusion. We identified 191 patients who underwent SBTHA at a single institution from 2016 to 2019. No drains were utilized and no patients donated blood preoperatively. Mean age was 59 years with 96 females (50.3%). The surgical approach was posterior in 138 (72.3%) and direct anterior in 53 (27.7%) patients. We analyzed blood loss, the rate of allogeneic blood transfusions, and in-hospital thromboembolic complications. We analyzed risk factors for transfusion with a logistic regression analysis. Twenty-two patients (11.5%) underwent allogeneic blood transfusion. All transfused patients were female. Univariate analysis revealed female gender as a transfusion risk factor since it had statistically significant higher proportion in the transfusion group than the nontransfusion group (100% vs 43.5%, respectively, P < .001). We did not identify any other singular significant risk factors for transfusion in a multivariable regression analysis. However, females with a preoperative Hb <12 had an elevated risk of transfusion at 37.5% (15/40 patients). With contemporary perioperative blood management protocols, there is a relatively low (11.5%) risk of a blood transfusion after SBTHA. Females with a lower preoperative Hb (<12 g/dL) had the highest risk of transfusion at 37.5%.

Efficacy and safety of institution-wide restrictive blood transfusion protocol in gynecologic surgical patients

The use of restrictive blood transfusion protocols has been well documented in specific patient populations, however there is little data in the field of gynecology. The objective of this study was to compare differences in blood transfusion rates and surgical complications before and after the implementation of a restrictive transfusion protocol. The target population included patients undergoing major abdominal surgery by both gynecologists and gynecologic oncologists at a university hospital.

Moving to a more restrictive transfusion protocol: Outcomes in head and neck free flap surgery

PurposeTo determine if a more restrictive transfusion protocol results in increased rates of adverse flap outcomes in patients undergoing free tissue transfer. Materials and methodsMixed retrospective and prospective cohort study. Patients who underwent surgery before the protocol change were collected retrospectively. Patients who underwent surgery after the protocol change were collected prospectively. ResultsOf the 460 patients who underwent free tissue transfer, 116 patients in the pre-change cohort (N = 211) underwent transfusion (54.98%) and 78 in the post-change cohort(N = 249) (31.33%) (p < 0.001). The mean number of units transfused was 1.55 + 2.00 in the pre-change cohort, and 0.78 + 1.51 in the post-change cohort (p < 0.001). When separated temporally, the pre-change cohort received significantly more blood transfusions than the post-change cohort in the operating room (33.65% vs 18.07%) (p < 0.01), within 72 h of surgery (35.55% vs 15.66%) (p < 0.001), and after 72 h after surgery to discharge (16.59% vs 8.03%) (p = 0.018017). The rate of flap failure was 6.70% in the pre-change cohort, and 5.31% in the post-change cohort (p = 0.67). In a logistic regression model controlling for potential confounders, transfusion protocol was not significantly associated with flap failure (OR = 1.1080, 95% CI: 0.48–2.54). There were no significant differences between cohorts for medical morbidity, ICU transfer, or death. ConclusionOur data support the conclusion that patients undergoing free tissue transfer to the head and neck can be transfused following the same protocols as other patients, without increasing the rate of flap failure or other morbidities.Level of evidence: 3 (mixed retrospective, prospective cohort study).

Restrictive vs liberal blood transfusion strategy in patients with symptomatic coronary artery disease: meta-analysis from randomized controlled trials

Abstract Background Anemia is common in patients with symptomatic coronary artery disease. Observational studies investigated blood transfusion threshold in symptomatic coronary artery disease but results were conflicting. Meta-analyses evaluating transfusion threshold utilized data mainly from observational trials but no meta-analysis, to our knowledge, used data solely from randomized clinical trials. Objective The goal of our study is to evaluate efficacy and safety outcomes in anemic patients presenting with symptomatic coronary artery disease using pooled data from randomized clinical trials. Methods We queried Medline, Embase and Cochrane data bases for randomized clinical trials comparing restrictive blood transfusion (defined as transfusion when hemoglobin is less than 8 gm/dl) vs liberal blood transfusion (transfusion when hemoglobin is less than 10 gm/dl) in patients presenting with symptomatic artery disease or acute coronary syndrome. We identified 3 randomized controlled trials; MINT, CRIT and REALITY trials. Data were pooled from 3 trials. Efficacy outcomes evaluated were all-cause mortality and New or recurrent myocardial infarction. Safety outcomes were congestive heart failure at 30-day follow up. Results A total of 820 patients were included in our meta-analysis; 420 patients in restrictive blood transfusion protocol and 400 in liberal blood transfusion protocol There was no difference between two groups at 30-day follow up in all identified outcomes (all-cause mortality, new or recurrent myocardial infarction, and Congestive heart failure). 55 patients died (22/420 in restrictive group and 33/400 in liberal group). Risk ratio of all-cause mortality in restrictive group was 0.63 [95% CI (0.38–1.07), P=0.09, I2=30%]. 15/420 in restrictive group and 16/400 in liberal group had new or recurrent myocardial infarction. Risk ratio of myocardial infarction in restrictive group was 0.91 [95% CI (0.46–1.80), P=0.78, I2=0%]. 20/420 patients in restrictive group and 24/400 in liberal group had congestive heart failure with risk ratio of 0.80 [95% CI (0.19–3.37), P=0.30, I2=76%] in restrictive group. Conclusion Our meta-analysis showed similar outcomes between restrictive and liberal transfusion policies in patients presenting with symptomatic coronary artery disease of acute myocardial infarction. Our findings are consistent with available data about restricting transfusion in general population. Restricting blood transfusion might be cost-effective. Further studies are warranted to evaluate long term safety and efficacy of such approach. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.

Quality Management of a Comprehensive Blood Conservation Program During Cardiopulmonary Bypass

BackgroundRed blood cell transfusion is common and associated with adverse outcomes for cardiac surgery, while present blood conservation guidelines have not been fully implemented until now. This study evaluated our comprehensive blood conservation program after quality management and explored its impact on blood transfusion and outcomes in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). MethodsWe retrospectively compared blood transfusions and outcomes of patients from 2 different periods, before and after initiation of the quality management of the comprehensive blood conservation program. The comprehensive program included restrictive transfusion protocols, conventional ultrafiltration, cell salvage, residual pump blood ultrafiltration, and a modified minimal extracorporeal circulation system. A 1:1 propensity score matching and subgroup analysis were conducted. ResultsThere were 3977 pairs. A significant decrease of red blood cell transfusion was observed before vs after the comprehensive blood conservation program during CPB (28.4% vs 18.6%, P < .001), in the operation (40.7% vs 34.3%, P < .001), and after the operation (6.2% vs 4.3%, P < .001). Also reduced were 30-day mortality and some major complications. Subgroup analysis showed that the comprehensive blood conservation program was more beneficial for patients aged >60 years, male, and with a medium-risk European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE) of score 3 to 5. ConclusionsThe comprehensive blood conservation program during CPB is safe and effective in adult cardiac operations, reducing blood use, with no adverse outcomes. For patients who are older, male, and have a EuroSCORE of 3 to 5, blood transfusion should be more cautious.

Optimization of red blood cell unit storage during SARS-COV-2 Pandemic: adopting new strategies to ensure supply in a decentralized blood bank in Brazil.

As coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) spread worldwide and social restrictions were intensified, difficulties in blood supply were expected to result in a shortage of blood donors, logistic issues and a change in blood consumption. Consequences could be detrimental to the meeting of the blood supply demand, especially in a decentralized blood bank in the State of São Paulo responsible for providing blood to more than 100 hospitals, mostly of the public health system. Aiming to minimize negative effects and focusing on maintenance of the blood supply, a different approach was discussed and adopted. Briefly, strategies were related to monitoring and promoting measures to achieve a positive RBC unit balance. Thus, the number of donors, transfusions, RBC unit inventory, RBC unit loss and RBC units within up to 5 days from the expiration date were evaluated. Several strategies were adopted to ensure sufficient availability of RBC units: blood donation was improved with social media and extra blood collections, a restrictive transfusion protocol was implemented, a new logistic process to use RBC units closer to the expiration date was established and non-isogroup transfusions were avoided. Altogether, described strategies were crucial to optimize blood storage during the pandemic. Investing in monitoring and logistics contributed to a positive RBC unit balance and conserving these strategies could be useful.

Liberal Versus Restrictive Hemoglobin Levels as Thresholds for Blood Transfusions.

Blood transfusion is a common treatment of anemia due to chronic disease or acute blood loss. However, there continues to be uncertainty concerning the appropriate threshold for transfusion. A restrictive protocol could decrease blood administered, transmissible infections, transfusion reactions, volume overload, and utilization of a limited commodity. However, anemia may result in decreased oxygen delivery which could lead to metabolic dysfunction an increased cell death. Determining an appropriate transfusion threshold is thus an important objective. A previous Cochrane review found the use of restrictive thresholds decreased transfusions compared to liberal thresholds. No difference in secondary outcomes, including 30-day mortality, hospital length of stay, cardiac events, and myocardial infarction, was noted.

Categorization and Frequency of Indications for Packed Cell Transfusion in the Preterm Newborn during the Initial Hospital Stay at a Tertiary Care Hospital: A Cross-Sectional Study

Introduction: Packed cell transfusion is a lifesaving procedure in premature babies as they have more complications as compared to babies who are born at term. Complications related to prematurity increase as gestational age decreases and anemia is one of the complications of prematurity which needs packed cell transfusions. To date, when to transfuse preterm babies and what would be the threshold for hemoglobin and hematocrit is still a point of argument as well as liberal versus restrictive transfusion protocols have been developed but what should be followed still needs more data. In our study, we have observed frequencies of different indications of packed cell transfusion in the neonatal intensive care unit of a tertiary care hospital. This endeavor will help in the establishment of guidelines regarding transfusion and the threshold on which any intervention should be done also it would be a step towards the identification of preventable causes that lead to transfusion and transfusion-related risks and hazards. Objective: To determine the indication of packed cell transfusion and their frequencies in preterm neonates. Study Design: This was a cross-sectional study. Setting: The study was carried out in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Study Duration: The duration of the study was 1 year. Material and Methods: A total of 246 preterm neonates admitted to Aga Khan University Hospital (AKUH) neonatal intensive care unit in the tenure of 1 year, fulfilling the inclusion criteria and requiring packed cell transfusion were included. After the approval from ethical review committee, charts were reviewed for gestational age, birth weight, mode of delivery (normal vaginal or Cesarean-section) were recorded. Indications of packed cell transfusion (intraventricular hemorrhage, infection or sepsis, anemia of prematurity, phlebotomy losses, increase oxygen requirement, hematological causes, other causes of hemorrhage and other causes) were observed and recorded. Pre-transfusion hemoglobin levels (g/dL) and hematocrit levels were also recorded. Other information like number and volume of transfusion and day of life on which transfusion was administered was also documented. Results: A total of 246 critically ill children were enrolled in this study. Of the total, 52.8% were baby boys and 47.2% were baby girls. 57% of babies were born via cesarean section and 43% were born via vaginal delivery. Out of total preterm newborns admitted in NICU, 22.8% were extremely preterm, 35.4% were very preterm and 41.9% were late preterm. Mean gestational age was observed to be 31 (±4) weeks and the mean birth weight of newborns was 1500 (±600) grams. Indications of packed cell transfusion observed in our study are intraventricular hemorrhage 10%, 26% sepsis/infection, 4% hematological disorders, 12.8% anemia of prematurity, 25.2% was related to increase in oxygen requirement, 13% other hematological causes and 9.3% other causes. Conclusion: An increase in oxygen requirement and anemia of prematurity were the indications that were observed in the extremely preterm and very preterm groups. Sepsis and increase oxygen requirement are some of the major causes of transfusions observed in the late preterm group. Preventable indications can be one of the areas that can be worked on and will reduce the need for transfusion in preterm babies with subsequent prevention of transfusion-associated risks.

Simultaneous Bilateral Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty With TXA and Restrictive Transfusion Protocols: Still a 1 in 5 Risk of Allogeneic Transfusion

BackgroundHistorically, there was up to a 60% risk of blood transfusion for patients undergoing simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty (SBTKA). As such, the goal of this study was to analyze the rate and risk factors for allogeneic blood transfusions in patients undergoing SBTKA with tranexamic acid (TXA). MethodsWe retrospectively identified 475 patients who underwent SBTKA with a double dose TXA regimen at a single institution from 2016 to 2019. Mean age was 65 years. Two hundred fifty-seven patients (54%) were female. Mean body mass index was 30 kg/m2. Drains were utilized in 143 patients (30%). Mean preoperative hemoglobin (Hgb) was 13.7 g/dL. Multivariate logistic regression analysis adjusting for age ≥70 years, sex, body mass index, drain use, and preoperative Hgb of <12.5 g/dL was utilized to identify risk factors for transfusion. ResultsOne hundred six patients (22%) received an allogeneic transfusion, including 28 patients (6%) who received ≥2 units. Multivariate analysis showed that preoperative Hgb <12.5 (OR = 3.99, P < .0001), female sex (OR = 2.34, P = .002), and drain use (OR = 2.13, P = .004) were risk factors for transfusion. Forty-two patients (42/83, 51%) with a preoperative Hgb <12.5 received a transfusion compared with 64 patients (64/392, 16%) with a Hgb ≥12.5 (P < .001). ConclusionPatients undergoing SBTKA with contemporary blood management still have a 1 in 5 rate of allogeneic transfusion. Drain use independently increases transfusion risk by 2-fold and should be avoided. Patients with a preoperative Hgb <12.5 have a transfusion rate of 50% and, as such, should either not undergo SBTKA or have extensive perioperative blood optimization.

Primary isolated CABG restrictive blood transfusion protocol reduces transfusions and length of stay.

Cardiac surgery accounts for 10-15% of blood transfusions in the US, despite benefits and calls of limiting its use. We sought to evaluate the impact of a restrictive transfusion protocol on blood use and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing isolated primary coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Blood conservation measures, instituted in 2012, include preoperative optimization, intraoperative anesthesia, and pump fluid restriction with retrograde autologous priming and vacuum-assisted drainage, use of aminocaproic acid and cell saver, intra- and postoperative permissive anemia, and administration of iron and low-dose vasopressors if needed. Medical records of patients who underwent isolated primary CABG from 2009 to 2012 (group A; n = 375) and 2013 to 2016 (group B; n = 322) were compared. CABG with grafting to three or four coronary arteries was performed in 262 (70%) and 222 (69%) patients and bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting in 202 (54%) and 196 (61%) patients in groups A and B, respectively. Mean preoperative and intraoperative hematocrit was 40.3% and 40.7%, 28.9% and 29.4% in groups A and B, respectively. Total blood transfusion was 24% and 6.5%, intraoperative transfusion 11% and 1.2%, and postoperative transfusion 20% and 5.6% (P < .0001 for all) in groups A and B, respectively. Median postoperative length of stay was 5.0 days in group A and 4.5 days in group B (P = .02), with no significant differences in mortality or morbidity. A restrictive transfusion protocol reduced blood transfusions and postoperative length of stay without adversely affecting outcomes following isolated primary CABG.

Red blood cell transfusion in preterm neonates: a huge debate on tiny patients

Preterm infants are more liable to suffer from anemia, as 90% of extremely low birth weight infants receive red blood cell transfusion. When to receive red blood cell transfusion is not well defined until now, even the complications and hazards resulting from the transfusion of adult red blood cell into the premature circulation is still a matter of debate. In this review, fetal erythropoiesis and the unique pathophysiology of anemia of prematurity is discussed, different meta-analysis studies are presented regarding liberal (high hemoglobin threshold) or restrictive (low hemoglobin threshold) transfusion protocols, early or late transfusion preferences. To clarify the picture of this, everyday decision neonatologists need to take, whether or not to give this premature infant a red packed cell transfusion, which may affect the life of this infant indefinitely. Until now, no fixed guidelines are present regarding when to transfuse anemia and still dependent on expert opinion and center experience.