Clinical Responsibilities Research Articles

Enhancing cardiology trainee competence through simulation-based pericardiocentesis training: a pilot programme evaluation

Abstract Introduction Cardiology training requires trainees to manage clinical duties whilst developing practical skills. Changes to the UK curriculum have resulted in reduced time available for procedural teaching. Pericardiocentesis is one of many required competencies. The Joint Royal College of Physicians Training Board cardiology curriculum cites the importance of simulation-based education to teach procedures. Procedural training encompasses the development of clinical reasoning alongside motor skills. Gange (1962) and Carless (2010) emphasized the importance of expert-guided practice, interactive teaching, and instant feedback in motor skills teaching to maximize the educational experience. Aim Develop a simulation teaching programme to enhance trainees' confidence and competency in pericardiocentesis. Procedures form part of a summative Direct Observation of Procedural Skills, enabling trainees to learn in a safe environment and use as evidence at their Annual Review of Competence Progression (ARCP). Method We developed a pilot programme for pericardiocentesis facilitated through high-fidelity equipment between February 2023 and February 2024. Participants were recruited through medical education departments. The sessions were delivered on a one-to-one basis by a cardiology consultant to facilitate discussion and interactivity. The teaching involved a core knowledge presentation, discussion of trainee experiences, case studies as examples, including review of echocardiography features. This was followed by clinical skills teaching of pericardiocentesis, utilizing a model, and transthoracic echocardiography. Trainees were sent anonymous feedback forms after the session. Results 46 cardiology registrars participated; 48% were within their first few years of training. 87% reported difficulty in practicing this skill in clinical practice due to: lack of exposure, other clinical responsibilities taking priority, and the need for consultant-delivered care on patients requiring an urgent or emergency procedure. Mean trainee confidence before teaching was 3.24 out of 5 (SD = 1.14), with a significant improvement to 4.48 (SD = 0.59 p<0.001). 52% improved in confidence by 1 unit and, 31% improved in confidence by 2 or more units. Trainees reported the following themes regarding the session: knowledgeable trainer, high fidelity equipment, instant feedback to predict, prevent, and overcome challenges, and a multi-modal approach to teaching, incorporating presentation and discussion on pericardial effusion, tamponade, and drainage. Conclusion Our programme offers a unique multi-modal teaching approach, with dedicated time with an expert. We supported the progress of 46 trainees and enhanced their training competencies. We aim to expand the programme to incorporate more procedures in line with growing curriculum requirements. Tracking trainee progress until ARCP outcomes will reveal the impact of simulation teaching on their experience and professional development.

Pharmacotherapy of acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction and the pharmacist's role, part 1: Patient presentation through revascularization.

In an effort to expedite the publication of articles, AJHP is posting manuscripts online as soon as possible after acceptance. Accepted manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and copyedited, but are posted online before technical formatting and author proofing. These manuscripts are not the final version of record and will be replaced with the final article (formatted per AJHP style and proofed by the authors) at a later time. Key pharmacotherapeutic modalities and considerations for the patient with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) across the critical initial phases of care are reviewed. Despite established value in the emergency department (ED), cardiac care, and intensive care settings, there is currently little published literature describing or supporting clinical pharmacist roles in the acute management of STEMI. The high-risk period from hospital presentation through revascularization and stabilization involves complex pharmacotherapeutic decision points, many operational medication needs, and multiple layers of quality oversight. While rife with opportunities for pharmacists to optimize care, this timeframe appears inconsistently targeted by clinical pharmacy services, which may halt after ED evaluation and then resume upon postcatheterization cardiac unit admission. Herein we review the key pharmacotherapeutic modalities and considerations for the patient with STEMI across the critical initial phases of care. These include supportive therapies prior to revascularization, the host of antithrombotics involved in revascularization by percutaneous coronary intervention and/or fibrinolysis, and other periprocedural medications. Important practice guidelines and clinical resources are summarized from the clinical pharmacist perspective, and roles and responsibilities of the responding pharmacist are suggested. A companion article will extend the review to periprocedural adverse event management, key early decision-making regarding long-term risk reduction, and pharmacist involvement in institutional quality improvement efforts. We aim to support inpatient pharmacy departments in advancing clinical services for this critical patient population, and we call for further research delineating pharmacist impact on patient and institutional STEMI outcomes. Patients presenting with STEMI rapidly traverse multiple phases of care and receive a host of antithrombotic and supportive medications during acute management, presenting many important pharmacotherapeutic decision points and roles for pharmacists.

Dr. Meena and mission maternal health: building allies in the government hospital

Research methodology The case study is based on field data, including in-depth semi-structured interviews with the main protagonist and related stakeholders of a large government hospital in Western India. After informed consent, the interviews with the stakeholders were conducted, transcribed and analyzed verbatim. In addition, secondary data from policy reports, newspaper articles and government websites was used to create the case. Since the protagonist works in the government system, her identity and other identifying information are disguised to maintain confidentiality. Case overview/synopsis The case study investigates the leadership challenges in a healthcare facility/hospital in public health. It traces the evolution of Dr Meena Sharma (Dr Meena), a leader in the government hospital ecosystem facing challenges such as infrastructural deficiencies, manpower deficit, healthcare bureaucracy and heavy patient load. This first-generation medical practitioner who transitioned from a private practice to a governmental one juggles balancing her demanding clinical practice, administrative responsibilities and teaching in the government hospital with her family responsibilities setup. However, in the wake of the upcoming LaQshya – Labour Room Quality Improvement Initiative by the Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, she strives to put together and motivate her team to work toward improving the quality of care during delivery and the immediate postpartum period at her hospital. Various issues arise in the organizational leadership for a woman leader such as adopting appropriate leadership style and using appropriate motivation and communication strategies for optimal performance. Complexity academic level The case study is aimed at teaching/training a) departmental heads of public and private hospitals, b) health program managers at higher and middle-level leadership roles, c) health policymakers at various levels in the government and other organizations and d) graduate and postgraduate students of public health, hospital management/administration. In addition to this, it can also be used for general management programs to teach organizational behavior, communication and leadership courses.

Salary Benchmarking for Voice-Specialized Speech-Language Pathologists

Purpose: This study aimed to understand how salaries of voice and upper airway–specialized speech-language pathologists (SLPs) differ from medical SLPs based on prevailing wage data and to give clinicians resources to better negotiate their salary and benefits. Method: A nationwide survey of voice-specialized SLPs was disseminated via various online platforms including American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Special Interest Group 3, Instagram, voice-specialized Facebook groups, and e-mail. Data were collected via REDCap. The survey investigates SLPs' salary, benefits, experience, clinical responsibilities, and profit generated through Current Procedural Terminology codes. Two separate analyses were completed. First, annual salary, as reported by participants, was compared against annual salary, as estimated by prevailing wage data. Second, a multiple regression driver analysis was completed to identify significant predictors of wage level within our sample. Outliers in the sample were removed using the Difference in Fits procedure. Results: A total of 111 participant surveys were included for analysis. Our data demonstrate that, between participant data and prevailing wage data, salaries for voice and upper airway disorders (VUAD) SLPs are significantly higher in the West, Midwest, and Southern regions. There is no significant difference in the Northeast. Several factors proved statistically significant predictors of increased salaries including years of work ( p ≤ .0001), cost of living ( p = .0030), and work in multidisciplinary setting ( p = .0223). Conclusions: As practitioners navigate negotiations for equitable compensation, leveraging localized salary data and emphasizing the value of specialized expertise may prove instrumental. Moreover, advocating for employer-sponsored professional development opportunities and benefits can enhance the overall well-being and professional satisfaction of VUAD SLPs, ensuring optimal delivery of care within this specialized field.

Diagnosing a genetic disease in a donor-conceived child: case report and discussion of the ethical, legal, and practical issues.

We describe the unexpected challenges pediatricians may experience when children conceived with assisted reproduction are diagnosed with a rare genetic condition. A local case series triggered a dialogue between many stakeholders with varied expertise. Indeed, diagnosing a genetic disease in a child conceived by embryo, egg, or sperm donation is becoming more common now that genetic testing and in vitro fertilization (IVF) are readily accessible. However, how and whether to share that information with other stakeholders in the gamete donation process has not been fully explored, and the clinical responsibilities of the treating clinician remain ill-defined. This work centers on a patient with a confirmed diagnosis of X-linked nephrogenic diabetes insipidus. Ultimately, we found the same AVPR2 mutation in two children from two families conceived by egg donation. It led to multigenerational cascade diagnoses in the family of the shared, anonymous egg donor. First, we review current genetic testing practices in gamete donation and third-party reproduction. Then, we provide an overview of relevant genomic, ethical, legal, and psychosocial considerations for sharing relevant genomic information. Finally, and to maximize the best interests of genetic relatives, we discuss how a pediatrician can play a role in the early disclosure of relevant clinical information to all stakeholders in the gamete donation process, starting with the fertility clinic. While these clinical cases are cast in a Canadian context, we submit that its important lessons generally apply to medical systems of nearly all developed countries, broadly defined.

Clinicians’ roles and necessary levels of understanding in the use of artificial intelligence: A qualitative interview study with German medical students

BackgroundArtificial intelligence-driven Clinical Decision Support Systems (AI-CDSS) are being increasingly introduced into various domains of health care for diagnostic, prognostic, therapeutic and other purposes. A significant part of the discourse on ethically appropriate conditions relate to the levels of understanding and explicability needed for ensuring responsible clinical decision-making when using AI-CDSS. Empirical evidence on stakeholders’ viewpoints on these issues is scarce so far. The present study complements the empirical-ethical body of research by, on the one hand, investigating the requirements for understanding and explicability in depth with regard to the rationale behind them. On the other hand, it surveys medical students at the end of their studies as stakeholders, of whom little data is available so far, but for whom AI-CDSS will be an important part of their medical practice.MethodsFifteen semi-structured qualitative interviews (each lasting an average of 56 min) were conducted with German medical students to investigate their perspectives and attitudes on the use of AI-CDSS. The problem-centred interviews draw on two hypothetical case vignettes of AI-CDSS employed in nephrology and surgery. Interviewees’ perceptions and convictions of their own clinical role and responsibilities in dealing with AI-CDSS were elicited as well as viewpoints on explicability as well as the necessary level of understanding and competencies needed on the clinicians’ side. The qualitative data were analysed according to key principles of qualitative content analysis (Kuckartz).ResultsIn response to the central question about the necessary understanding of AI-CDSS tools and the emergence of their outputs as well as the reasons for the requirements placed on them, two types of argumentation could be differentiated inductively from the interviewees’ statements: the first type, the clinician as a systemic trustee (or “the one relying”), highlights that there needs to be empirical evidence and adequate approval processes that guarantee minimised harm and a clinical benefit from the employment of an AI-CDSS. Based on proof of these requirements, the use of an AI-CDSS would be appropriate, as according to “the one relying”, clinicians should choose those measures that statistically cause the least harm. The second type, the clinician as an individual expert (or “the one controlling”), sets higher prerequisites that go beyond ensuring empirical evidence and adequate approval processes. These higher prerequisites relate to the clinician’s necessary level of competence and understanding of how a specific AI-CDSS works and how to use it properly in order to evaluate its outputs and to mitigate potential risks for the individual patient. Both types are unified in their high esteem of evidence-based clinical practice and the need to communicate with the patient on the use of medical AI. However, the interviewees’ different conceptions of the clinician’s role and responsibilities cause them to have different requirements regarding the clinician’s understanding and explicability of an AI-CDSS beyond the proof of benefit.ConclusionsThe study results highlight two different types among (future) clinicians regarding their view of the necessary levels of understanding and competence. These findings should inform the debate on appropriate training programmes and professional standards (e.g. clinical practice guidelines) that enable the safe and effective clinical employment of AI-CDSS in various clinical fields. While current approaches search for appropriate minimum requirements of the necessary understanding and competence, the differences between (future) clinicians in terms of their information and understanding needs described here can lead to more differentiated approaches to solutions.

A-183 Examination of the Roles and Responsibilities of Clinical Chemists as Determined by an International Peer Response-Based Survey

Abstract Background Doctoral-level clinical chemists (also termed clinical biochemists) have unique, broad roles in laboratory medicine spanning numerous clinical specialties. However, the full scope of responsibilities for a clinical chemist is not well understood, and institutional recognition and support varies. We sought to better understand the roles and responsibilities of practicing clinical chemists through distribution of an online survey designed to examine work-related responsibilities and other key factors related to job satisfaction. Survey results demonstrate the value of clinical chemists and can be used to promote parity within the profession. Methods Survey data was collected for 5 weeks from 10/10/2022-11/14/2022. The survey was targeted towards individuals holding doctoral level degrees (MD, PhD or MD/PhD), and consisted of 41 questions related to demographics, compensation, duties/responsibilities, and institutional support. Data analysis focused on responses from full-time clinical chemists located in the US and Canada (n=223/298 total respondents). Results Survey responses included male (n=109) and female (n=109) clinicians from all career stages (early <10y, n=101; mid 10-20y, n=63; late >20y, n=59). Clinical chemistry was the primary specialty reported (69%), followed by clinical pathology (16%), with 55% of responses reporting more than one specialty of practice, most often toxicology (21%). Multiple institution types (academic, community, reference laboratory, other) and academic career tracks (clinical, education, research, other) were represented; Most respondents were based in an academic hospital laboratory (n=131/223). Self-reported daily working hours varied by gender, years in practice, job duties and institutional setting; Females reported working more hours than males, working hours increased with years in practice, and the academic hospital setting reported the longest working hours, as did those on an ‘Education’ track. Responsibilities were quantified based on time spent per week; Clinical service represented the greatest time spent per week (majority result, 20-40h/week), followed by administrative (1-20h/week), research (<1-10h/week), teaching (<1-10h/week) and CE (<1-10h/week) duties. Support for clinical responsibilities was assessed further; 69% of respondents felt they had adequate time to perform clinical responsibilities, 55% reported access to adequate resources to perform clinical responsibilities and 51% reported feeling ‘Moderately’ or ‘Very’ stressed by clinical workload assignment. Top reasons for feeling overwhelmed included ‘Understaffing or inadequate support staff’ (n=113 responses), ‘Increased volume of work or caseload’ (n=73 responses) and ‘Lack of IT support to make necessary changes/improvements’ (n=70 responses). Resource quality was individually rated; Medical technologists, research technologists/scientists, LIS support and research support received a ‘Less than adequate’ rating by the majority of respondents, while compensation, administrative support and equipment received majority ‘Adequate’ ratings. Conclusions Clinical chemists work in a wide range of healthcare settings with unique career tracks, although the majority of work hours are devoted to provision of clinical service regardless of role definition. Most or all prioritize clinical work due to limited resources, which can limit research time and academic contributions. Clinical responsibilities are tied to feelings of stress and overwhelm in more than half of the survey population and could be reduced with improved quality and/or quantity of staff support.

Advanced Practice Providers in Cellular Therapy: Survey Results from the ASTCT APP Special Interest Group Exploring Clinical Roles, Compensation, and Job Satisfaction

BackgroundAdvanced practice providers (APPs), which include physician assistants/associates and advanced practice nurses, are critical members of the transplant and cellular therapy (TCT) care team. Despite broad utilization in transplant centers, there is little published literature on the clinical roles and responsibilities, staffing models, compensation structure, and job satisfaction of TCT APPs. This study represents the results of a national survey administered by the APP Special Interest Group to better characterize the TCT APP workforce. ObjectiveTo characterize the TCT APP workforce by investigating clinical roles and responsibilities, compensation and institutional support, and job satisfaction. MethodsA 25-item web-based survey addressing four domains (transplant center data, APP roles and responsibilities, compensation and institutional support, and job satisfaction). Surveys were sent to participants through a chain-referral sampling method. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and multinomial logistic regression. ResultsA total of 198 responses were analyzed, representing 64 transplant centers of varying size from 29 states. APPs report working in inpatient and outpatient settings and performing a broad array of TCT-associated procedures including bone marrow biopsy (78%), lumbar puncture (43.2%), intrathecal chemotherapy (47.0%), and cellular infusions (45.9%). Median salary of respondents was $110,000-$119,000 and was significantly associated with geographic location of transplant center and years of experience. A minority of respondents reported no funding (4.2%) or time (9.8%) supporting continuing education. A majority of APPs (55.1%) do not feel they are appropriately paid. A majority (54.3%) did not feel that their center supported a good work-life balance. Nearly 35.4% of respondents did not feel valued in their role. ConclusionsThis survey represents the first to characterize the TCT APP workforce in the United States. APPs are highly integrated into the TCT care team and can serve as means to improve patient access to TCT therapies given a worsening physician shortage. However, the lack of satisfaction with compensation and work-life balance could represent barriers to recruitment and retention of TCT APPs and warrant future studies to better characterize.

General practice trainee, supervisor and educator perspectives on the transitions in postgraduate training: a scoping review

Transitions are a period and a process, through which there is a longitudinal adaptation in response to changing circumstances in clinical practice and responsibilities. While the experience of the transition...

Improving Recruitment Of Older Patients For Patient And Public Involvement And Engagement Work (PPIE): Ensuring A Representative Voice

Abstract Background Older people are under-represented in research, despite this demographic being the biggest users of healthcare resources. Service design needs to be patient-centred and therefore engaging this underserved group is crucial, albeit challenging. We describe a quality improvement project aimed at improving recruitment of patients into a local PPIE group in a perioperative geriatric service. Methods Clinicians opportunistically consent patients for the PPIE group during their perioperative geriatric clinic consultations. A baseline level of recruitment was established before implementing a series of PDSA cycles. The interventions were firstly, to adapt the paper clinic proforma making the consent section clearer, secondly to give weekly reminders to clinicians, and finally discussing PPIE with patients while they wait for their appointment. A focus group with clinicians was run using nominal group technique to explore barriers and potential solutions to recruitment. Results An average of three patients were being recruited per month from April 2022 to September 2023. Two weeks following the first intervention, no new patients were consented. Two weeks following the second intervention, this improved to two new patients. Following the third intervention, five new patients were recruited after two clinic sessions. From the focus group, the top three barriers to recruitment were forgetting, clinical responsibilities taking priority, and lack of awareness by new staff. The highest rated solution was utilising non-clinical staff to recruit patients in the waiting room. Conclusion During busy clinics, it is easy for clinicians to forget about issues not directly related to the patient in front of them. However, PPIE is vital in co-designing healthcare. There are both staff and patient-related barriers in recruiting and maintaining a PPIE group in older patients. From our project, we found a combination of passive (e.g. a tickbox proforma) and active recruitment by dedicated staff the best way to improve PPIE.

Enabling diagnostic excellence in the real world: Managing complexity, uncertainty and clinical responsibility.

Diagnostic error is a significant category within preventable patient harm, and it takes many years of effort to develop proficiency in diagnostic reasoning. One of the key challenges medical schools must address is preparing students for the complexity, uncertainty and clinical responsibility in going from student to doctor. Recognising the importance of both cognitive and systems-related factors in diagnostic accuracy, we designed the QUID Prompt (Questions to Use for Improving Diagnosis) for students to refer to at the bedside. This set of questions prompts careful consideration, analysis, and signposting of decision-making processes, to assist students in transitioning from medical school to the real-world of work and achieving diagnostic excellence in clinical settings.

Respect for history: an important dimension of contemporary obstetrics & gynecology.

"Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it." This maxim underscores the importance of historical awareness in medicine, particularly for obstetricians and gynecologists (ObGyns). ObGyns significantly impact societal health through their care for pregnant women, fetuses, and newborns, uniquely positioning themto advocate for health initiatives with lasting societal benefits. Despite its importance, the history of medicine is underrepresented in medical curricula, missing opportunities to foster critical thinking and ethical decision-making. In today's climate of threatened reproductive rights, vaccine misinformation, and harmful ideologies, it is imperative for ObGyns to champion comprehensive historical education. The history of medicine, particularly in relation to societal issues- such as racism, discrimination, genocides, pandemics, and wars- provides valuable context for addressing challenges like maternal mortality, reproductive rights, vaccine hesitancy, and ethical issues. Understanding historical milestones and notable ethical breaches, such as the Tuskegee Study and the thalidomide tragedy, informs better practices and safeguards patient rights. Technological advancements in hygiene, antibiotics, vaccines, and prenatal care have revolutionized the field, yet contemporary ObGyns must remain vigilant about lessons learned from past challenges and successes. Integrating historical knowledge into medical training enhances clinical proficiency and ethical responsibility, fostering innovation and improving health outcomes. By reflecting on historical achievements and their impacts, current and future ObGyns can advance the field, ensuring comprehensive and ethically sound approaches to patient care. This paper highlights the crucial role of historical knowledge in shaping modern ObGyn practices, advocating for its integration into medical education to address contemporary health challenges and ethical considerations.

The evolution and formalization of anesthesia assistant roles across Canada.

The purpose of this Special Article is to document the evolution of the anesthesia assistant (AA) profession in Canada and summarize AA practice at Canadian institutions as it exists today, five decades after Quebec and 15years after most other provinces formalized AA practice. Through the Management Committee of the Association of Canadian University Departments of Anesthesia (ACUDA), we conducted a purposeful sampling of all ACUDA chairs or their delegates. We requested the following data: history of AAs becoming a reality in their particular province or region; potential recruitment pools; training programs and curricula; pathway to credentialing; funding, pay, retention, recruitment, and status of union representation; and metrics. Data were provided by 19 institutions in 8 provinces: Newfoundland and Labrador, Nova Scotia, Quebec, Ontario, Manitoba, Saskatchewan, Alberta, and British Columbia. Given the different health care governance structures across the provinces, AA roles vary in terms of its associated technical, clinical, and educational responsibilities. The role of AAs in supporting anesthesia care through equipment maintenance and assistance with airway management, resuscitation, and administration of regional anesthesia seems to be well established, as is their role in providing brief intraoperative relief for anesthesiologists during a stable period of anesthesia. Anesthesia assistant duties continue to evolve, becoming more aligned with the specific institution and less dependent on the supervising anesthesiologist. Apart from the initial metrics collected during the Ontario ACT implementation pilot projects, we are not aware of any formal metrics, current or ongoing, being collected across Canada, related to either patient safety events or perioperative efficiency. This compilation of pan-Canadian AA data shows diverse models of practice and highlights the value to patients and the health care system as a whole of incorporating these allied professionals into the anesthesia care team (ACT). The present findings allow us to offer suggestions for consideration during discussions of retention, recruitment, program expansion, and cross-country collection of metrics and other data. We conclude by making six recommendations: 1. recognize that implementation of ACTs is a key element in solving the challenge of an increasing surgical backlog; 2. develop, or facilitate the development of, metrics and increase data-sharing nationally to enable health care authorities to better understand the importance of AAs in patient safety and perioperative efficiency; 3. develop and implement funding strategies to lower the barriers to AA training such as hospital-sponsored positions, ongoing salary support, and return-of-service arrangements; 4. ensure that salaries appropriately reflect the increased level of training and added levels of responsibility of certified AAs; 5. develop long-term strategies to ensure stable funding, recruitment and retention, and a better match between the number of AA training positions and the need for newly certified AAs; and 6. engage all stakeholders to acknowledge that AAs, as knowledgeable and specifically trained assistants, not only fulfill their defined clinical role but also contribute significantly to patient safety and clinical efficiency by assuming nondirect patient care tasks.

ThP1.11 - Harnessing digital consent analytics to highlight multicentre operative and consent trends in breast surgery

Abstract Introduction Paper-based consent is difficult to audit at scale, therefore hospital episode statistics data is used to provide insights into national breast surgical practice. However, as digital consent is becoming routine, analysis of amalgamated data is possible to provide a better understanding of consent practice. Methods Between 22/04/2020-29/11/23, patient anonymised digital consent data was analysed retrospectively using Concentric Health analytics (Audit ID:1123ABS). Inclusion criteria required the responsible clinician to be a breast surgeon, with non-breast surgical procedures excluded. Results n=6860 digital consent episodes were performed across 10 NHS Trusts and 4 private institutions (n=890 unique operations. n=82 unique responsible clinicians, n=191 consenting clinicians). 45.6% (n=3125/6860) of the cases were consented by consultants. 18.7% (n=1286/6860) underwent a mastectomy; 78.5% simple & 21.5% reconstruction (of which 82.6% implant and 17.4% autologous reconstruction). 40.1% (n=2750/6860) underwent breast conserving surgery (79.2% WLE, 18.9% therapeutic mammoplasty, 1.9% Intercostal perforator). Re-excision of margins accounted for 16% of BCS cases (n=441/2750). SLNB was performed in 40.6% and ANC in 11.5% of all breast surgery cases. Regarding localisation; 44.5% Seed, 30.6% Wire, 21.7% palpable/other, 3.2% USS skin mark. Conclusion As well as providing benefits in terms of information sharing and improved patient satisfaction, digital consent also provides an opportunity to provide high-level data, regarding which operations are being consented to, when and by whom.

A framework for medical physics compensation in an academic department

AbstractCompensation is a key component of career satisfaction and professional growth. A new compensation model was developed to provide a framework for career growth and a compensation ladder for medical physicists with clinical responsibilities in an academic radiation oncology department. The goals for the new model were: (1) create a market competitive plan to support recruitment and retention of top physics talent, (2) incentivize clinical effort, innovation, citizenship/professional service, and academic achievement, (3) provide compensation growth opportunities separate from medical school promotions, and (4) create consistent, transparent, and fair metrics applicable to all clinical physicists in the department. The model includes a base salary, and credits for board certification, clinical tier, leadership, and academic level. Further, metrics were developed to inform the clinical tier. Years of experience is not explicitly included in the model. The model was successfully implemented for clinical physicists in a relatively large academic radiation oncology department.

“Microbiology can be . . . ” Student Competition to Develop Resources about Infectious Diseases that Improve Health Literacy

The European Association of Establishments for Veterinary Education emphasizes the importance of communication skills and teamwork for student success in clinical practice. Traditionally, many veterinary curricula lacked standardized formal training in acquiring these essential skills. Effective communication and collaborative teamwork are not only crucial for fulfilling the clinical responsibilities of the veterinary profession but also play a pivotal role in the broader societal context. Veterinarians, in their social role, serve as scientific communicators for the community. This role involves conveying scientific concepts, even complex ones, with a particular emphasis on their significance for public health, reaching a diverse audience. Currently, there is a growing public health necessity to improve health literacy, which refers to the ability to access, understand, appraise, and use information to support healthy choices by society, especially for topics like infectious diseases and vaccination. This became more evident during the global COVID-19 pandemic. This teaching tip describes the development, organization, and broad outcomes of a student competition introduced during a standard veterinary medicine course to design novel resources on microbiology and infectious disease-enhancing health literacy. Three separate events were organized during the academic years 2020–2023. The third-year veterinary medicine students attending the 3-month course on infectious diseases of small animals participated in a student competition aimed at promoting creativity and innovation. Their task was to develop novel resources that delivered informative content to the public concerning microbiology and infectious diseases. Participation was voluntary and students participated in groups of 5–6. Overall, 125 students created 22 projects on microbiology and infectious diseases that were able to enhance health literacy. This approach allowed students to engage with the content and convey foundational knowledge to others in an easily accessible way. This skill of communicating with the public using easy-to-understand language is essential for success in the veterinary medicine profession. The resources produced, such as drawings, comics, games, and videos, constitute informative sources. Thus, they were published online on a scientific journal to disseminate knowledge of infectious diseases to a broader audience.

The hygienist's role in the management of the implant patient in primary care.

The scope of practice for dental hygienists includes the care of implants and peri-implant tissues. Hygienists in primary care settings must therefore be competent and confident in assessing, managing, and treating implant restorations and their peri-implant health. Dental hygienists also play a key role in the education of patients on oral health as part of their daily practice, a recognised and valued aspect of their clinical care responsibilities. Dental hygienists and therapists therefore have a pivotal role as adjunct support in a patient's implant journey where they can offer essential support throughout their treatment period and can provide guidance and education at regular intervals.Using current guidelines, dental hygienists and therapists can create and implement practice protocols to help deliver the necessary clinical care during pre-implant, peri-implant, and post-implant phases of care. This article discusses the processes required to achieve a healthy implant patient, how the dental team can support the patient, and how clinicians can work together to achieve the best possible clinical outcome. This article will explore current evidence-based guidance and how to implement guidance in a practice setting, with protocols for all members of the dental team, with the final goal of a dentally healthy, motivated patient.

Testamentary capacity

SUMMARY To make a valid will, a person should be able to understand the nature and consequences of doing so, the extent of their estate and the claims others may have on it. No disorder of mind should be present that would affect their testamentary decisions, and clinicians are therefore often asked to give an opinion on whether a person has testamentary capacity. This article discusses the legal issues involved, with reference to UK case law (in particular, the legal test of Banks v Goodfellow (1870)), and outlines the requirements of testamentary capacity assessment (including retrospective assessments), the clinician's responsibilities when requested by a solicitor to make an assessment of capacity (‘the golden rule’) and what they might expect if appearing in court to give expert witness regarding testamentary capacity. Fictitious case studies are presented illustrating certain points in testamentary capacity assessment.

Helping Patients Die: Implementation of a Residency Curriculum in Medical Aid in Dying.

As more states legalize medical aid in dying (MAID), there is an ever-increasing need of physicians trained in this type of end-of-life care. However, resident curricula in MAID have not been previously reported or assessed. The authors describe a residency curriculum in MAID and evaluate the resident outcomes of this program. Since 2018, the Sutter Family Medicine Residency Program in California has offered training in MAID to its residents. Residents attend lectures, evaluate patients for MAID, write prescriptions for aid-in-dying medications, and attend the planned deaths of their patients if desired. In February 2023, an anonymous branching survey was sent to graduates of the program from 2019 to 2022 to evaluate residency graduation year, receipt of MAID training, currently practicing MAID, how rewarding MAID is compared with other clinical responsibilities, how stressful MAID is compared with other clinical responsibilities, comfort discussing MAID with colleagues, comfort discussing end-of-life care generally, personal view of MAID as a practice, and works where MAID is permitted. The authors surveyed 28 graduates and collected data from 21 former residents (response rate, 75%). Of these 21 former residents, 17 (81%) reported having opted to receive training in MAID during residency. Of the 12 residents who received training and were currently practicing in a location that allowed MAID, 7 (58%) were still practicing aid in dying, and of these 7 residents, 5 (71%) reported that their aid-in-dying work was more rewarding than their other clinical responsibilities. Overall, there was high resident interest in this training and robust skill use after graduation. Additional studies will need to focus on patient outcomes, explore resident reasons for opting out of training, and investigate other effects of instituting a MAID curriculum.

A Qualitative Exploration of Oncology Clinician's Needs for PGT-M Discussions in Clinical Practice.

Purpose: Oncology clinicians are appropriately positioned to facilitate discussions of assisted reproductive technologies including preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disease (PGT-M), in the context of cancer treatment or surveillance. Yet, reproductive services, including PGT-M, remain one of the least implemented services in oncology. No studies to date have explored which practice resources the clinicians need to increase knowledge of PGT-M. The objective of this study was to explore the specific needs of oncology clinicians to help maximize the reproductive potential of young adult patients with hereditary cancers. Methods: Participants were recruited through notices circulated on social media platforms and snowball sampling. Participants completed a brief online survey to confirm eligibility. Eligible participants completed a virtual, semi-structured interview. Interviews focused on clinician experiences with PGT-M and initiating referrals to fertility specialists. Thematic analysis was conducted using a constant comparative approach to identify current clinical practices. Results: This study found that PGT-M discussions are not necessarily within the scope of responsibilities for oncology clinicians owing to prioritization of cancer treatment and overall lack of knowledge. Participants need accessible resources and timely support for reproductive planning in the context of cancer treatment. Participants desire a streamlined referral pathway to professionals trained in oncofertility to help address their patient's reproductive needs. Conclusion: Our study identified that educational and referral resources to reproductive specialists are needed to maximize reproductive potential across the cancer continuum. These findings provide a foundation for larger studies that can inform standard-of-care recommendations in the emerging field of oncofertility.