Responsibility For Health Problems Research Articles

Knowledge production, communication and utilization: studying biomedical alcohol research

PurposeA growing body of social research analyzes how the biomedical interest in detailed molecular aspects of people's bodies (genes, biomarkers, DNA) affect everyday notions of health, risk, and responsibility for health problems. However, this research focus has been largely neglected in social alcohol research. The purpose of this paper is to report on some early findings from a study of media portrayals of biomedical alcohol research and to present a rationale for studying biomedical alcohol research more broadly.Design/methodology/approachThe empirical discussion is based on textual analysis of 90 newspaper articles published in Swedish newspapers between 1995 and 2010 and one‐on‐one semi‐structured interviews with 24 newspaper readers about their interpretation of the newspaper portrayals. The motives for studying biomedical alcohol research more broadly are discussed in relation to existing research and theories of biomedicalization.FindingsIt is found that a large majority of the newspapers cite biomedical researchers to explain the mechanisms of addiction, and that biomedical research is often presented as revolutionary in scope. However, journalists also act as storytellers who explain the biomedical research results to readers. The reward system proved to be a central notion among the interviewees, who had their own, different and varying definitions of the concept. The authors suggest a framework for analyzing how biomedical knowledge is produced, communicated and utilized by three types of key actors.Originality/valueThe study presents a novel framework for studying biomedical alcohol research.

Preventionitis: The Exaggerated Claims of Health Promotion

Ed James Le Fanu Social Affairs Unit, pounds sterling 9.95 + pounds sterling1 p&p, pp 133 ISBN 0-907631-58-4 Across the political spectrum there is widespread disagreement about how we should best advance the national health. On one matter, however, disputants from left and right agree: they despise health promotion. To collectivists, health education entails “blaming the victim.” The responsibility for health problems lies in the inequalities of society, and health education does nothing more than foist this responsibility on to the very people who suffer most and are in the least powerful position to change their circumstances. Thus exhortations to “eat yourself fitter” serve only as a smokescreen for the real problems. Such attitudes to health promotion come from commentators who believe, …