Response To Intervention Research Articles

Overcoming Reading Difficulties with Reading Fluency Strategies in the Turkish Language: Evidence from a Transparent Orthography

This study employed a single-case design with an AB structure to examine the effect of implementing a Response to Intervention (RTI) model on a fourth-grade elementary school student with reading difficulties. The participant in the study was Deniz, a fourth-grade elementary school student. The pretest measures revealed that Deniz was at the frustration level in both word recognition and reading comprehension skills. Consequently, an eight-week reading intervention program was designed to address and remediate Deniz’s reading difficulties. Through the intervention program, Deniz’s word recognition improved from the frustration level to the instructional level, and her reading comprehension progressed from the frustration level to the independent level, accompanied by a significant decrease in reading miscues.

From Belief to Practice: Understanding Response to Intervention (RTI) or Multi-Tiered System of Supports (MTSS), Implementation among Primary School Teachers

The Multi-Tiered System of Supports (MTSS), also known as Response to Intervention (RTI), is an educational reform initiative aimed at providing quality education and evidence-based treatments for all students. The main objective of the study was to investigate how teachers perceive the beliefs and practices regarding the RTI/MTSS process. The quantitative survey design was used to achieve the main goal for this study. Primary school teachers of these two districts (Multan and Jehlum) were considered a population regardless of their gender. 700 teachers were selected using a stratified random sampling method. A 34-item self-developed questionnaire was used to collect data. Inferential data analysis was used to compare the teachers' beliefs and practices about the RTI/MTSS process with demographic characteristics like location, gender, district, and teaching experiences. The study's results show that teachers had stable and clear ideas about the RTI/MTSS process. Although the teachers saw a moderate and small improvement in their practices, this suggests that their beliefs and actions did not match. The study also established that there were statistical differences in perceived norms between the male and female teachers, the teachers from the different districts, and the teachers with different experience in teaching, but no difference in vignette practices. Further research may attempt to investigate the commonality of the intervention process that has been effective at increasing rates and establish potentially teachable strategies in independent practice.

Discrepancy model to RtI: Gauging teacher preparedness for this shift in specific learning disability classification

AbstractThe Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (2004) allows alternate pathways for school districts to identify and classify students with a specific learning disability (SLD). Response to Intervention (RtI) is one of the frameworks schools can use when eliminating the use of the discrepancy model. The premise of RtI posits that tiered instruction can assist all students who are struggling through utilizing research‐based interventions. When these tiers of intervention services are exhausted with limited to no response to the intervention, a child can be classified under the SLD category. There are documented concerns with effective implementation of RtI frameworks. This qualitative exploratory study examined the perceptions of teachers in a graduate education program regarding the knowledge, usage and implementation of RtI to classify students with a SLD. Through thematic analysis, findings indicate a need for more training in districts, better preparation at the university level and more support in applying RtI in the classroom. Implications for practice and future research are discussed.

Do the Special Education Regulations in States Requiring RtI for SLD Identification Include or Omit Intervention Fidelity?

This study examined intervention fidelity (IF) and the extent to which this essential feature of response to intervention (RtI) was included within artifacts (laws and guidance documents) for states requiring RtI for specific learning disability (SLD) identification. Intervention fidelity is defined as the degree to which an intervention is implemented as planned. Artifacts from all U.S. states were reviewed. Twelve states were identified as requiring RtI for SLD identification, and they comprised the sample for the study. Using state department of education websites, artifacts for the 12 states were found and reviewed for any information on preferred terms (fidelity or integrity), definition, IF dimensions (adherence, exposure, interventionist quality, and participant response), and methods for assessing, reporting, and evaluating IF. We found nine states used the term fidelity, four states provided explicit guidance on assessing IF, and two states provided explicit information on how often to collect IF data and what level (percent) of IF was required for intervention decision-making. Implications for state policies and practices, future directions for improving IF knowledge, application, and evaluation, and study limitations are discussed.

Equity in Literacy Education: A Case Study of Tier 2 Personalized Instruction

According to the NAEP, proficiency in reading is reported to be 67% in 4th-grade students. General education classroom teachers are responsible for providing Tier 1 and 2 instruction, including interventions in Tier 2. However, many teachers are unsure about implementing interventions and have had negative experiences with Response to Intervention (RTI), finding the process frustrating and overwhelming. This case study examines the effectiveness of teachers who have seen an increase in reading levels and student interest. The research explores the teachers’ perceptions, experiences, and skills of the current implementation of RTI using Gibbs’ Reflective Practice as a theoretical framework. Data collected from individual interviews and observations are analyzed using open coding. Themes and concepts are identified from the interview and observational data. These findings inform educators and higher education teacher educators about Tier 2 implementation and equitable, personalized instruction in the RTI process, aiming to strengthen the implementation and effectiveness of Tier 2 interventions in the general education classroom.

Predicting implementation of response to intervention in math using elastic net logistic regression.

The primary objective of this study was to identify variables that significantly influence the implementation of math Response to Intervention (RTI) at the school level, utilizing the ECLS-K: 2011 dataset. Due to missing values in the original dataset, a Random Forest algorithm was employed for data imputation, generating a total of 10 imputed datasets. Elastic net logistic regression, combined with nested cross-validation, was applied to each imputed dataset, potentially resulting in 10 models with different variables. Variables for the models derived from the imputed datasets were selected using four methods, leading to four candidate models for final selection. These models were assessed based on their performance of prediction accuracy, culminating in the selection of the final model that outperformed the others. Method50 and Methodcoef emerged as the most effective, achieving a balanced accuracy of 0.852. The ultimate model selected relevant variables that effectively predicted RTI. The predictive accuracy of the final model was also demonstrated by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) plot and the corresponding area under the curve (AUC) value, indicating its ability to accurately forecast math RTI implementation in schools for the following year.

Assessing teachers' knowledge and attitudes toward implementing a response to intervention approach in the classroom

The aim of this study was to explore elementary school teachers' knowledge and attitudes about implementing the Response to Intervention (RTI) approach, which is a system used to identify and support students with learning disabilities or those who face learning difficulties. A total of 152 elementary school teachers participated in the survey, including 64 males and 88 females. Various statistical methods were applied to analyze the data, such as Cronbach’s alpha, frequencies, percentages, four-way ANOVA, and Scheffe’s post hoc test. The findings showed that teachers had a moderate level of knowledge about RTI and held neutral attitudes toward its implementation. The study also found no significant differences in responses based on gender, specialty, or the highest degree achieved. However, teachers with more than 10 years of experience showed different responses compared to those with less experience. Additionally, a positive link was found between teachers' knowledge of RTI and their attitudes toward its use. Based on these results, some recommendations are provided.

Measuring Elementary Student Reading Gain in the Context of School-Implemented Multitiered Systems of Support

There is limited research with mixed results about student reading gains in Grades 1 to 5 within typical school-implemented Response to Intervention (RTI). As part of a larger study, we used school-administered screening data on a widely used computer-adaptive test (Measures of Academic Progress) to describe reading gains across one academic year. We observed relatively faster growth in the first grade than in the later grades. We found stronger growth for students not identified with a disability relative to students with low or high-incidence disabilities or a 504 plan. We explored moderation of gains for students receiving tiered interventions based on administrators’ interviews about RTI implementation. We observed that better ratings of administrators’ articulation about using the evidence-aligned RTI components of progress monitoring, data-based decision-making, and Tier 2 interventions were related to greater gains for students receiving Tier 2 or 3 intervention. We discuss implications, limitations, and directions for future research.

Navigating Challenges in Implementing Response to Intervention in Schools: A Qualitative Survey

Abstract Date Presented 03/21/24 This qualitative study identified barriers to response-to-intervention (RtI) implementation in schools, highlighting the need for systemic change in education. OT practitioners can address these barriers by fostering inclusivity and supporting diverse learners. Primary Author and Speaker: Chavae Peters-White Additional Authors and Speakers: Dr. Rae Ann Smith Contributing Authors: Julie L. Watson

Response to intervention: The effects of tier 1 and tier 2 occupational therapy intervention on sensory processing for fifth-grade children

ABSTRACT Sensory processing impacts a student’s ability to participate in the classroom, yet there is a lack of studies analyzing the effect of occupational therapy (OT) services under the Response to Intervention (RtI) model on students’ sensory processing. The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of a manualized OT intervention, using the RtI model, on sensory processing in general education fifth-grade students and teachers’ understanding of sensory processing. This pretest-posttest quasi-experimental study included an experimental group that received OT RtI (n = 17) and a control group that did not receive OT RtI but teachers attended a workshop on sensory processing (n = 27). Pretest and posttest results from the Sensory Processing Measure-2 (SPM-2) School Form and an online survey of teachers’ understanding of sensory processing were collected. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to analyze pre- and post-intervention SPM-2 results for each participant. In the experimental group, one subcategory approached significance, a slight decline approaching significance in the planning subcategory, and no significant changes in the remaining subcategories. In the control group, one subcategory demonstrated significance. Teacher understanding and use of sensory processing strategies showed an overall improvement in both schools. Preliminary evidence suggests teacher workshops have the potential to improve teacher understanding of sensory processing.

Comparing Tier 1 reading instruction with Tier 3 or special education intervention through an observational snapshot of school-implemented response to intervention across Grades 1–5

AbstractThere is limited research about Tier 3 interventions provided during typical school Response to Intervention (RTI) implementation. As part of a larger RTI exploration study designed to focus on students with the most intensive reading needs, our goal was to contrast their Tier 1 core reading instruction with their Tier 3 intervention. Schools identified participating students as receiving Tier 3 or special education for reading. We aimed to provide a snapshot of differences in Tier 1 and intensive interventions delivered to 264 students from 32 elementary schools. Our research team used the Instructional Content Emphasis-Revised (ICE-R; Edmond & Briggs, 2003) to observe differences in group size and the amounts and types of curricular content (e.g., code vs. meaning-focused) students received during both tiers. We explored whether these patterns were consistent across Grades 1–5 and if they differed in relation to students’ disability (reading disability vs. other disability vs. no disability). We also examined whether the Tier 3 observation data was consistent with administrators’ reports about RTI implementation within their school. Across the grades, we found significantly more small-group than whole-class instruction during Tier 3 than in Tier 1. We observed significantly lower proportions of code-focused instruction than meaning-focused instruction, particularly during Tier 1. Generally, code-focused instruction decreased across the grades in both tiers. Although we found a trend suggesting students with reading disabilities may have received higher proportions of code-focused instruction than other students, this was not significant after multiple comparisons. We discuss some similarities and differences between our observations and administrator data. We discuss implications, limitations, and directions for future research.

Implementation of Rtl as a Part of Multi-tiered Systems of Support: What Teachers, Administrators,Teacher Educators Need to Know

Multi-tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) is an outgrowth of Response to Intervention (RtI). The various systems of support for students and school communities provided through these programs are integral to modern education and embedded in the Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEIA) of 2004. While there are many benefits to the implementation of MTSS and RtI, there are various obstacles that can hinder successful intervention programs. The absence of consensus across districts and states with respect to program development and implementation creates confusion. This article addresses considerations and concerns related to MTSS and RtI. Discussed are underlying principles, challenges to effective implementation, expertise and training of teachers, and usage for classification for special education services. The roles of general and special education teachers, administrators, and university preparation programs are examined, and recommendation providec

Developing and Implementing a Tier 1 Reading Program Within an RTI Framework: A University–School Partnership

Response to intervention (RTI) is a valuable framework for providing effective and equitable educational opportunities to all students; however, recent research indicates that RTI programs are not achieving their potential for promoting student learning. As schools develop, implement, and sustain RTI systems, they would benefit from the addition of collaborative support provided by professionals knowledgeable about the RTI framework, including specific elements of this model such as evidence-based practices and progress monitoring assessments. We describe the process and outcomes of a university–school partnership aimed at developing and implementing an RTI program for reading at the Tier 1 level.

Development and validation of a semi-automated, scalable response to intervention framework in mathematics

Response to Intervention (RTI) has been shown to be better at identifying and addressing learning difficulties than other frameworks. However, only a few educational systems have implemented it, and it can be difficult for schools to implement RTI on their own without policies in place. One solution is to create semi-automated digital tools that can assist with RTI without requiring a lot of extra time from the teacher. This study describes the development and implementation of such tools in schools that were not previously familiar with RTI. The effectiveness of the tools was tested by comparing 5 schools (149 students) that used RTI with 8 schools (269 students) that did not. The results showed that the extra practice was effective and that students in the intervention group made significantly more progress in arithmetic fluency than their peers in the control group. These students were also more likely to leave the “low achievement” and “at risk of Mathematics Learning Difficulties” zones than students in the control group. This suggests that it is possible to develop a scalable RTI framework and implement it in educational systems without RTI-based policies.

An implementation case study for the Response to Intervention (RTI) approach for oral language and reading instruction in the early years of primary school

ABSTRACT In this paper, we report the initial stages of Response to Intervention (RTI) implementation in one school that participated in the Getting it Right from the Start (GIRFTS) pilot study. Implementation of an RTI framework for oral language and reading was supported by teacher professional learning and a dedicated Implementation Support Partner (ISP). Participants were interviewed to explore their perceptions of the change process and identify barriers and enablers to implementation. Thematic analysis was used to identify factors that supported the implementation of RTI, including strategic collegial relationships, teacher motivation, and a desire to achieve consistency of assessment and instruction. The ISP was seen as a crucial coaching role for keeping implementation on track, providing feedback and advice, and helping teachers translate professional learning into their school context. This study highlights some key factors that schools and policy-makers should focus on to promote successful early implementation of RTI approaches.

Good in theory, difficult in practice: An examination of secondary algebra teachers’ views about RtI

Research about response to intervention (RtI) programs has primarily focused on the elementary level, and there is a noticeable lack of research specific to secondary mathematics RtI programs. As such, the focus of this qualitative study was secondary algebra teachers’ perceptions and self-efficacy for the implementation of RtI. Research participants consisted of eight secondary algebra teachers that had implemented RtI programs and had at least five years of teaching experience. A semi-structured interview protocol was utilized to discuss the types of interventions they utilized, perceptions of the implementation, beliefs in their ability to effectively implement RtI, along with their view of the training they received. The researcher found student behavior, time, and training had negative impacts on teachers’ perceptions and self-efficacy towards implementing RtI programs. While participants in the study exhibited an understanding of the various tiers of intervention along with the processes involved in RtI, we conclude that there was an overall lack of preparation to work within an RtI system. The findings of this research study are of particular importance for school administrators and secondary mathematics teachers to better understand the latent barriers for successful RtI implementation. The findings of this study help these key individuals better understand the perceptions and barriers for implementing secondary mathematics RtI.

Support for students with special educational needs in the Slovenian education system

The article outlines how support is provided to students with special educational needs in the Slovenian education system. The principles of the adopted forms of assistance and the five tiers of the intervention model are discussed: 1. Support from teachers in the classroom, including lesson-related activities and other forms (additional teacher assistance), 2. Additional support from the school self-government, 3. Individual and group additional support, 4. Support from external institutions, 5. The process of issuing opinions regarding programs for students with special educational needs and individualized programs. The first tier involves additional teacher support, aimed at adapting the teaching process to the individual needs of students. The second tier consists of additional initiatives and measures within the student government. The third tier encompasses an individualized approach, taking into account the unique requirements of each student. The fourth tier provides support from external institutions specializing in assistance for students with disorders and disabilities. The fifth tier involves the process of issuing decisions and developing an individualized support program. The principles of supporting students with Special Educational Needs (SEN) in the Slovenian education system are drawn from the Response to Intervention (RTI) model, widely recognized and applied in the USA for over 30 years. Currently, many teachers, researchers, and other specialists are examining its utility. The text includes an analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of the adopted support model and several conclusions relevant to the Polish context of education for students with special educational needs.

The Impact of Initial Level of Performance on Multidisciplinary Team Eligibility Decisions When Using Response to Intervention

When using response to intervention (RTI) for special education eligibility decisions, multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) may use performance level and rate of improvement (ROI) as two metrics when evaluating student responsiveness. Although examining student responsiveness to instruction is a critical component of an evaluation using RTI, previous research suggests that final level of performance is the main factor in MDT decisions. ROI is influenced by pre-intervention performance and is also inherently captured in students’ postintervention level, potentially limiting ROI's utility as a distinct indicator of performance. To address these issues with ROI, this study examined whether initial performance level and ROI improve actual MDT decisions about special education eligibility beyond the final level of performance. Results indicate that initial level of performance and ROI add no additional value to predicting MDT's eligibility decisions when using RTI despite identified students having significantly lower initial performance levels and lower ROIs than their nonidentified peers.

Response to Intervention and Specific Learning Disability Identification: Evidence From Tennessee

Response to intervention (RTI) is a method for providing academic support to students and for identifying specific learning disabilities (SLDs). Using interrupted time series and hazard models, we examined if statewide RTI adoption in the U.S. state of Tennessee was associated with changes in rates of SLD and first-time SLD identification in elementary schools, and if these associations varied across student groups. Response to intervention was associated with an initial decline in the percentage of students with SLD in the state that continued over time, with larger decreases for students who were Black or economically disadvantaged. Response to intervention was associated with a 61% average decrease in the odds of first-time SLD identification by third grade (about a 0.006 change in the predicted probability), with greater declines for students who were Black or economically disadvantaged. We discuss these results in the context of disproportionality in special education and the need for research examining whether declines in SLD were due to improved academic outcomes, as opposed to delays in identification.

Detecting reading difficulties in Spanish in older elementary students in the context of the Response to Intervention model.

Detecting students with reading difficulties (RD) is particularly important in the context of the Response to Intervention (RTI) model, in terms of both research and professional practice. However, there is no unanimous agreement on the best procedure to carry it out. In addition, most of the research in this field has been carried out in the English language, and there is little evidence on how these measures behave in other languages. This study focuses on identifying the best procedure for detecting RD in Spanish in older elementary students, comparing the validity, accuracy and goodness of fit of three different universal screening assessment approaches-the Psychometric Assessment Approach, the Curriculum-Based Assessment Approach and the Teacher Detection Approach-using RTI as a criterion to determine the goodness of fit of the different approaches. A total of 154 fifth-year primary students participated in this study. The results reveal that the multivariate inclusion of the evaluation approaches used is the best means of ensuring an efficient, valid assessment when attempting to identify RD among fifth graders. This finding has practical implications for the implementation of the RTI model in the field of RD.