Resolved Hepatitis B Virus Infection Research Articles

Impact of Hepatitis B Surface and Core Antibody Levels on Hepatitis B Virus Reactivation.

Hepatitis B virus reactivation (HBV-R) is a serious complication that can occur in patients with resolved HBV infection during cancer chemotherapy. We examined the levels of HBV surface antibody (HBsAb) and HBV core antibody (HBcAb) to assess the incidence of HBV-R in cancer patients including hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and rituximab administration. This retrospective cohort study included 590 patients with resolved HBV infection. The incidence of HBV-R was evaluated 761.5 (range, 90-3898) days after the inititiation of chemotherapy. Of the patients, 13 (2.2%) developed HBV-R after the start of chemotherapy. All 13 patients exhibited lower HBsAb (<100 mIU/mL) levels at baseline. A higher level of HBcAb (≥100 cut off index (C.O.I.)) was a possible risk factor for HBV-R as well as HSCT and rituximab administration. The simultaneous presence of HBsAb <100 mIU/mL and HBcAb ≥100 C.O.I. increased the risk of HBV-R by 18.5%. Patients treated with rituximab were at a higher risk of HBV-R (18.4%) despite having HBcAb <100 C.O.I. Our results suggest that assessment of HBsAb and HBcAb levels prior to the chemotherapy is important for identifying patients at high risk of HBV-R, especially in solid cancers without HSCT and rituximab administration.

Outcomes of Cessation of Nucleos(t)ide Analog Administration on Hepatitis B Virus Reactivation after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: A Nationwide Retrospective Study

Monitoring of hepatitis B virus (HBV)-DNA and HBV-DNA-guided preemptive therapy using nucleos(t)ide analogs (NAs) are recommended to prevent the development of hepatitis due to HBV reactivation after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) in recipients with resolved HBV infection. However, little is known about the appropriate duration of NA treatment and the effect of NA cessation on the recurrence of HBV reactivation. This study aimed to clarify the consequences of NA cessationin allo-HSCT recipients with resolved HBV infection who experienced HBV reactivation following transplantation. We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of recipients with resolved HBV infection (hepatitis B surface antigen [HBsAg]-negative, anti-HBc-positive) before allo-HSCT who had been diagnosed with HBV reactivation (HBsAg-positive and/or HBV-DNA detectable) after allo-HSCT between January 2010 and December 2020. A total of 72 patients from 16 institutions were registered (median age, 60 years; age range, 27 to 73 years; 42 males and 30 females). The day of initial HBV reactivation ranged from day 10 to day 3034 after allo-HSCT (median, 513 days). Anti-HBs were lost in >80% of the patients at the time of HBV reactivation. All 72 patients received preemptive NAs, and no fatal HBV reactivation-related hepatitis was observed. HBV-DNA without hepatitis was continuously detected in 5 patients during the follow-up period. Administration of NAs was discontinued in 24 of 72 patients (33%) by physician decision. Second HBV reactivation occurred in 11 of the 24 patients (46%) in whom administration of NAs was discontinued. The duration of NA treatment did not differ significantly between patients with or without second HBV reactivation. The frequency of further HBV reactivation tended to be lower in patients with an anti-HBs titer of >10 mIU/mL at the time of NA cessation. Multiple reactivations of HBV after NA cessation was common in patients with HBV reactivation who underwent allo-HSCT despite the long duration of NAs. Careful monitoring of HBV-DNA is important even after the discontinuation of NAs in the case with HBV reactivation after allo-HSCT, because multiple reactivations could occur. Active immunization by HB vaccine might be effective for suppressing further HBV reactivation after cessation of NAs.

Hepatitis B virus infection status and clinical characteristics in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Objective: To investigate the epidemiology of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in China and its association with RA disease characteristics. Methods: A cross-sectional study. A retrospective study was conducted on RA patients recruited from January 2001 to February 2023 in the Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital. Demographic and clinical data were collected including age, gender, disease duration, active smoking, RA disease activity, physical function, radiographic assessment, serological markers of HBV infection and liver function indicators. According to the status of HBV infection, RA patients were grouped as chronic HBV infection, resolved HBV infection and no HBV infection groups. The distribution of each group and the clinical characteristics of RA patients were analyzed. Results: Among 1 941 RA patients, 1 461 (75.3%) completed HBV screening, including 335 males (22.9%) and 1 126 females (77.1%), with a mean age of (55.4±13.1) years. The prevalence of chronic HBV infection was 10.1%(148/1 461), which was significantly higher in male patients than in females [14.6%(49/335) vs 8.8%(99/1 126), P<0.001], especially among those males born from 1970 to 1979[20.0%(7/35) vs 8.5%(17/201), P=0.037] and 1980-1989 [31.8%(7/22) vs 10.5%(14/133), P=0.007]. Among 148 RA patients with chronic HBV infection, there were 5 cases (3.4%) of chronic hepatitis B, 2 cases (1.4%) of HBV-associated cirrhosis and 1 case (0.7%) of hepatocellular carcinoma. The prevalence of resolved HBV infection was 57.6%(841/1 461). There were 472(32.3%) patients with no HBV infection and 267(56.6%) of them showed negative anti-HBs. Among all RA patients, 15 (1.0%) patients had abnormal liver function, of which 7 cases were drug-induced liver injury, 5 cases were chronic hepatitis B, 2 cases were non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, and 1 case was primary biliary cholangitis. Conclusion: Chronic HBV infection remains a common complication in RA patients in China, the infection rate is 10.1%, and the screening and management of HBV infection should be strengthened in clinical practice.

Hepatitis B Virus Status and Clinical Outcomes in IgA Nephropathy

Immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN) has been reported to coexist with hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. Despite the clinical significance of this association, there is a lack of comprehensive research investigating the impact of various common conditions following HBV infection and the potential influence of anti-HBV therapy on the progression of IgAN. We investigated 3 distinct states of HBV infection, including chronic HBV infection, resolved HBV infection, and the deposition of hepatitis B antigens in renal tissue, in a follow-up database of 1961 patients with IgAN. IgAN progression was defined as a loss of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) >40%. Multivariable cause-specific hazards models to analyze the relationship between HBV states and IgAN progression. Chronic HBV infection was identified as an independent risk factor for IgAN progression, supported by both prematching analysis (hazard ratio [HR], 1.61; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06-2.44; P= 0.024) and propensity-score matching analysis (HR, 1.74; 95% CI 1.28-2.37; P< 0.001). Conversely, resolved HBV infection showed no significant association with IgAN progression (HR, 1.01; 95% CI 0.67-1.52; P= 0.969). Moreover, the presence of HBV deposition in the kidneys and the utilization of anti-HBV therapy did not appear to be significant risk factors for renal outcomes (P > 0.05). Chronic HBV infection is an independent risk factor for IgAN progression, whereas resolved HBV infection is not. In patients with IgAN, management of concurrent chronic HBV infection should be enhanced. The presence of HBV deposition in the kidneys and the use of anti-HBV medications do not impact the kidney disease progression in patients with IgAN with concurrent HBV infection.

Impact of HBcrAg levels on HBsAg seroconversion after HBV rebound: a case report

BackgroundNucleoside analogues (NAs) such as entecavir are required for at least 12 months when patients with resolved hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection develop HBV reactivation. Entecavir treatment does not always achieve hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) seroconversion. The cessation of NA for HBV reactivation sometimes causes HBV rebound. The impact of hepatitis B core-related antigen (HBcrAg) on predicting HBV rebound is controversial.Case presentationA 67-year-old woman with resolved HBV infection received rituximab for post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder after peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. Since she tested positive for HBV-DNA after the first rituximab therapy (day 0), entecavir treatment was started. Because the HBV-DNA test became negative and her liver function had been normal, entecavir was terminated on day 376. According to the retrospective measurements, HBcrAg remained positive while the HBV-DNA level was undetectable. One hundred forty-one days after entecavir cessation, the HBV-DNA turned positive again, suggesting HBV rebound (day 517). Her liver function deteriorated and HBV infection worsened, even though entecavir treatment was resumed on day 615. On the contrary, hepatitis B surface antibody levels increased after the rebound, resulting in HBsAg seroconversion with HBcrAg and HBV-DNA levels undetectable. HBV reactivation has not been detected after the second entecavir cessation, and both HBcrAg and HBV-DNA levels remained undetectable.Discussion and conclusionsThis case suggests that NA cessation induced-HBV rebound achieved HBsAg seroconversion under the guidance of a hepatologist. Since HBcrAg had been detectable while HBV-DNA was undetectable, HBcrAg may be an index for predicting HBV rebound resulting in HBsAg seroconversion as well as other conventional laboratory tests. Prospective measuring HBcrAg is required to confirm this case report.

Impact of Mogamulizumab-Containing Chemotherapy on HBV Reactivation in Patients with T-Cell Lymphoma: A Multicenter Retrospective Observational Study (PROACTIVE-MOGA)

INTRODUCTION Reactivation of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is a potentially lethal complication, but may be preventable in patients with chronic HBV infection or resolved HBV infection who receive systemic chemotherapy.The risk of HBV reactivation (HBVR) depends on not only HBV infectious status but also type of systemic chemotherapy. An anti-CCR4 antibody, mogamulizumab (Moga), has been developed for the treatment of peripheral T-cell lymphomas. Moga is known to suppress CCR4-positive regulatory T cells and helper T cells, which can lead to immunological dysfunction. However, there is little evidence regarding the risk of HBVR in patients with chronic HBV infection or resolved HBV infection who receive Moga-containing systemic chemotherapy. We conducted a retrospective observational study to evaluate the risk of HBVR and clinical outcome in those patients. METHODS &amp; MATERIALS: Patients treated with Moga-containing chemotherapy for T-cell lymphoma between May 2012 and March 2021, who were chronic HBV infection (defined as seropositive for HBsAg) or resolved HBV infection (defined as seronegative for HBsAg, but seropositive for anti-HBc or anti-HBs), were included. The primary endpoint was the rate of HBVR; HBVR in HBsAg-positive patients was defined as any of the following three criteria: 1) 2 log or more increase in HBV DNA from baseline, 2) 3.0 Log IU/ml or more of HBV DNA in patients with undetectable HBV DNA at baseline, 3) 4.0 Log IU/ml or more of HBV DNA in patients not available for HBV DNA at baseline. HBVR in HBsAg-negative patients was defined as any of following three criteria: 1) detectable for HBV DNA in patients with undetectable HBV DNA at baseline, 2) 1.3 Log IU/mL or more of HBV DNA in patients not available for HBV DNA at baseline, 3) seroconversion of HBsAg. RESULTS: A total of 23 HBsAg-positive patients and 246 resolved HBV-infected patients were retrospectively reviewed. Among the 23 HBsAg-positive patients, the median age was 65 years (interquartile range [IQR], 63-73) and 19 patients (82%) had adult T-cell leukemia-lymphoma (ATL). Baseline HBV DNA was undetectable level, detectable not quantifiable, and detectable in 9 (39%), 2 (9%), and 12 (52%) patients, respectively. All 23 HBsAg-positive patients received anti-HBV prophylaxis prior to Moga treatment. One of 23 (4.3%) patients experienced HBVR who led to HBV-related hepatitis. Among the 241 patients with resolved HBV infection, the median age was 65 years (IQR, 63-73) and 223 patients (91%) had ATL. Baseline serostatus of anti-HBc and anti-HBs were as follows: anti-HBc positive and anti-HBs positive in 177 patients (72%), anti-HBc-positive but anti-HBs negative in 50 (20%), the remaining 9 were anti-HBc negative but anti-HBs positive. Baseline HBV DNA was undetectable in 233 (95%), detectable not quantifiable in 5 (2%), and the remaining 3 were detectable for HBV DNA. Only 3 patients received anti-HBV prophylaxis. HBVR occurred in 11 patients, and the 2-year cumulative HBVR rate was 3.5% (95% CI, 1.6-16.5). Among the 11 patients with HBVR, the median peak HBV DNA level was 2.1 Log IU/mL (IQR, 1.7-5.0), the median time from first dose of Moga to HBVR was 140 days (IQR, 82-765) and 2 had HBV-related hepatitis. CONCLUSION: Our current study showed that the risk of HBVR was 4.3% (1 of 23) among HBsAg-positive patients with antiviral prophylaxis and 4.6% (11 of 238) among resolved HBV-infected patients without antiviral prophylaxis following Moga-containing chemotherapy. Anti-HBV prophylaxis and HBV DNA monitoring guided preemptive anti-HBV therapy are recommended to prevent HBV-related hepatitis for HBsAg-positive and resolve HBV-infected patients, respectively.

Recurrence of HBV Reactivation after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Transplantation in Recipients with Resolved HBV Infection: A Nation-Wide Multicenter Retrospective Study

Introduction Reactivation of hepatitis B virus (HBV) is known to cause fulminant hepatitis after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) in recipients with resolved HBV infection. Monitoring of HBV-DNA and HBV-DNA-guided preemptive therapy using nucleotide analogue (NA) is recommended to prevent developing hepatitis due to HBV reactivation after allo-HSCT. However, little is known about the adequate duration of NA treatment and the frequency of the recurrence of HBV reactivation (2nd HBV reactivation) after discontinuation of NA. We conducted a nationwide retrospective study of HBV reactivation after allo- HSCT. Patients and Methods We retrospectively reviewed the clinical information of recipients with resolved HBV infection (HBsAg-negative, anti-HBc-positive) before allo-HSCT and were diagnosed as HBV reactivation (HBsAg and/or HBV-DNA positive) after allo-HSCT from January 2010 to December 2020. Patients who received prophylactic NA before HBV reactivation were excluded. This study was approved by the Hokkaido University Hospital institutional review boards and registered as UMIN 000046803. Results A total of 72 patients were enrolled (median age of 60 years, range, 27-73 years; 42 males and 30 females) from 16 institutions. Initial hematological diseases were acute myeloid leukemia 21, myelodysplastic syndrome 14, chronic myeloid leukemia 4, acute lymphoblastic leukemia 12, non-Hodgkin lymphoma 8, adult T cell leukemia-lymphoma 6, mixed phenotype acute leukemia 4, and others 3. HSCT details were as follows: donor source, unrelated bone marrow 33, cord blood 24, related peripheral blood 11, unrelated peripheral blood 4; acute graft versus host disease (GVHD) 48 (66.7%); chronic GVHD 44 (61.1%); systemic steroid usage 41 (56.9%). Initial HBV reactivation after allo-HSCT was observed on day 10-3034 (median 512.5). Immunosuppressants and systemic steroids were administered in 35 (48.6%) and 28 (38.9%) patients respectively at the time of HBV reactivation. The patients who showed anti-HBs below protection levels (&amp;lt;10mIL/mL) were 18 (25%) of 72 patients at pre-HSCT, however, the number increased to 35 (81.4%) of 43 patients who were analyzed at the point of HBV reactivation after allo-HSCT. All patients received preemptive NA (entecavir 65, tenofovir alafenamide 6, tenofovir 1). Elevated aspartate transaminase of more than 200 U/L was observed in 7 cases at HBV reactivation, and all of them showed HBV-DNA more than 4 Log IU/mL. No one developed fulminant hepatitis but 5 patients resulted in continuous HBV carriers. Twenty-four of 72 patients were discontinued NA by each physician's decision. Of 24 patients who discontinued NA, 11 (45.8%) patients developed 2 nd HBV reactivation. The median duration from discontinuation of NA to 2 nd HBV reactivation was 113 days (range, 15 to 434). Duration of initial NA administration was not significantly different between patients with 2 ndHBV reactivation and those without 2 nd HBV reactivation (90-1968 days, median 553 vs 145-3734 days, median 861; p=0.11). In those who analyzed anti-HBs at discontinuation of NA, 4 of 8 cases (50.0%) with anti-HBs &amp;lt;10 mIU/mL developed 2 nd HBV reactivation, whereas only 1 of 6 cases (16.7%) with anti-HBs &amp;gt;10 mIU/mL developed 2 nd HBV reactivation. Four of the 11 cases with 2 nd HBV reactivation were attempted rechallenge of NA discontinuation, however, all 4 cases developed 3 rd HBV reactivation on day 28-127 after discontinuation of NA. These 4 cases further developed 4 th HBV reactivation after the rechallenge of discontinuation of NA. One patient developed protective anti-HBs titer after 2 courses of HB vaccination, and finally successfully discontinue the NA after 4 th HBV reactivation. The patient did not develop further reactivation for more than 3 years. Conclusion 2 nd reactivation of HBV after NA discontinuation was common in patients with HBV reactivation who received allo-HSCT despite the long duration of NA. Acquisition of anti-HBs by HBV reactivation itself or HB vaccine would be necessary to suppress further HBV reactivation. Careful monitoring of HBV-DNA is important even after the discontinuation of NA in the case with HBV reactivation after allo-HSCT because multiple reactivations could occur. A prospective randomized trial of the HB vaccine after allo-HSCT for preventing HBV reactivation is now ongoing (UMIN000034113).

Size Matters! Anti-HBs Titer and HBV Reactivation During Anti-TNF Therapy.

We and others have previously described that hepatitis B surface antibody (anti-HBs) seems to protect against clinically significant HBV reactivation in cohort studies of patients undergoing anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) therapy. However, there were too few cases of HBV reactivation within cohort studies to assess the role of anti-HBs titer on reactivation. The purpose of this study was to systematically review the correlation between anti-HBs titer and the degree of clinically relevant HBV reactivation in patients undergoing anti-TNF therapy. We systemically reviewed all studies discussing anti-TNF therapy in patients with resolved HBV infection, defined as hepatitis surface antigen (HBsAg) negative and hepatitis B core antibody (anti-HBc) positive. We identified a total of 48 cases of reactivation from 5 cohort studies and 10 case reports or case series; 21 were anti-HBs negative, 7 were only reported as anti-HBs positive, 16 were anti-HBs positive with titer below 100, and 4 were anti-HBs positive with titer above 100. HBsAg sero-reversion was dominantly seen in patients with negative, low and/or declining anti-HBs titers. There was a significant trend toward less clinically relevant form of reactivation with increase in baseline anti-HBs titer (p = 0.022). Anti-HBs titers greater than 100 iU/L protect against clinically relevant HBV reactivation, while patients with low anti-HBs titers or negative anti-HBs had more clinically relevant HBV reactivation and higher rates of HBsAg sero-reversion. This suggests the importance of baseline quantitative anti-HBs prior to starting anti-TNF therapy and consideration vaccination for boosting anti-HBs titers prior to and/or during therapy.

HBV reactivation in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with anti-interleukin-6: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

The objective of this study was to assess the possibility of HBV reactivation (HBVr) in patients with RA under anti-IL-6 treatment. Using PubMed, Scopus and EMBASE, we performed a systematic literature search for articles related to HBVr in RA patients under anti-IL-6 treatment. The search was performed with no date limits and was last updated 28 January 2023. The results from all the databases were combined and duplicates were excluded, as were non-English articles, case reports, position articles, comments, and paediatric studies. Our initial search led to 427 articles; 28 were duplicates, 46 non-English, 169 reviews, 31 books/letters, 25 case reports, and 88 irrelevant to the meta-analysis aim; 21 were excluded due to inadequate information, leaving 19 articles, with a sum of 372 RA patients with chronic HBV (CHB) or resolved HBV infection, for further analysis. The overall risk for HBVr in RA patients with CHB was 6.7%, increasing to 37% when only RA patients with CHB and no antiviral prophylaxis were included. On the contrary, HBVr was close to 0% in RA patients with resolved HBV infection, irrespective of antiviral prophylaxis. All RA patients experiencing HBVr in these studies were successfully managed with antiviral treatment and/or drug withdrawal. Overall, anti-IL-6 treatment comes with a significant risk of HBVr in RA patients with CHB; risk is diminished when antiviral prophylaxis is used. In contrast, in RA patients with resolved HBV infection, the risk of HBVr seems to be extremely low. Large, well-designed studies (either controlled trials or multicentre/international observational studies) are warranted to further validate these results.

Association between resolved hepatitis B virus infection and femoral and spinal bone mineral density in American adults: a cross-sectional study.

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is a global health concern that can potentially affect bone health. However, the specific association between resolved HBV infection and bone mineral density (BMD) remains unclear. This cross-sectional study aimed to investigate the potential association between resolved HBV infection and femoral and spinal BMD in adults in the United States. This cross-sectional study included participants aged 20-79 years with negative HBV surface antigen (HBsAg) from the 2005-2010, 2013-2014, and 2017-2018 cycles of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Resolved HBV infection was defined as negative HBsAg with positive HBV core antibody. BMD was measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance baseline characteristics. A total of 10,333 eligible participants were identified and matched, of whom 737 (7.1%) had resolved HBV infection. Men with resolved HBV infection had significantly lower femoral and spinal BMD compared to those with no HBV infection, both before and after PSM. In the matched population, resolved HBV infection in men was negatively associated with femoral BMD (β= -0.024, 95% CI: -0.047 to -0.002, p = 0.0332) and spinal BMD (β= -0.025, 95% CI: -0.048 to -0.002, p = 0.0339). Postmenopausal women exhibited similar trends to men, while premenopausal women showed a tendency towards higher BMD, although statistical significance was not consistently achieved. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses supported the robustness of the findings. The study suggests a negative association between resolved HBV infection and femoral and spinal BMD in adult men in the United States. It highlights the importance of routine bone density assessments and the consideration of anti-osteoporotic therapy, if necessary, in individuals with resolved HBV infection.

Hepatitis B reactivation is a rare event among patients with resolved infection undergoing anti-CD20 antibodies in monotherapy without antiviral prophylaxis: results from the HEBEM study

IntroductionProspective data on the risk of hepatitis B reactivation (HBVr) among patients with resolved HBV infection undergoing anti-CD20 antibodies monotherapy is scarce. We aimed to assess the risk of HBVr in patients with resolved HBV infection treated with rituximab or ocrelizumab in monotherapy for multiple sclerosis (MS) or neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) without antiviral prophylaxis.MethodsHEBEM is a prospective study that included all consecutive adults HBsAg-negative/anti-HBc-positive who initiated anti-CD20 antibodies for MS or NMOSD at Cemcat. Inclusion criteria encompassed undetectable HBV-DNA, absence of other immunosuppressants or antiviral therapy. Every 6 months HBsAg, ALT and HBV-DNA were performed to rule out HBVr (defined by 2-log increase in HBV-DNA or seroconversion to HBsAg+).ResultsFrom August/2019 to August/2022, 540 subjects initiated anti-CD20 antibodies, 28 (5.2%) were anti-HBc-positive and were included. Twenty-two received rituximab and 6 ocrelizumab. The majority (89.3%) had previously received ≥ 1 immunomodulatory drug, with corticosteroids (82.1%) and interferon (42.9%) as the most common. At inclusion, all presented normal transaminases and undetectable HBV-DNA. Median anti-HBs levels were 105.5 mIU/mL (IQR 0–609). Median follow-up was 3.1 years (2.1–4.0). Median number of cycles of anti-CD20 antibodies was 6 (3–7), with a cumulative dose of 8.5 g (5.8–11.2) of rituximab and 3 g (1.8–3.8) of ocrelizumab. Neither cases of HBVr nor changes in anti-HBs titers were observed per 83.6 patient-years treated with monotherapy with anti-CD20 antibodies.ConclusionsIn this cohort of patients with MS or NMOSD and resolved HBV infection, anti-CD20 monotherapy was not associated with detectable risk of HBV reactivation despite the lack of antiviral prophylaxis.

Prevention and management of hepatitis B virus reactivation in patients with hematological malignancies in the targeted therapy era.

Hepatitis due to hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation can be serious and potentially fatal, but is preventable. HBV reactivation is most commonly reported in patients receiving chemotherapy, especially rituximab-containing therapy for hematological malignancies and those receiving stem cell transplantation. Patients with inactive and even resolved HBV infection still have persistence of HBV genomes in the liver. The expression of these silent genomes is controlled by the immune system. Suppression or ablation of immune cells, most importantly B cells, may lead to reactivation of seemingly resolved HBV infection. Thus, all patients with hematological malignancies receiving anticancer therapy should be screened for active or resolved HBV infection by blood tests for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and antibody to hepatitis B core antigen. Patients found to be positive for HBsAg should be given prophylactic antiviral therapy. For patients with resolved HBV infection, there are two approaches. The first is pre-emptive therapy guided by serial HBV DNA monitoring, and treatment with antiviral therapy as soon as HBV DNA becomes detectable. The second approach is prophylactic antiviral therapy, particularly for patients receiving high-risk therapy, especially anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Entecavir and tenofovir are the preferred antiviral choices. Many new effective therapies for hematological malignancies have been introduced in the past decade, for example, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy, novel monoclonal antibodies, bispecific antibody drug conjugates, and small molecule inhibitors, which may be associated with HBV reactivation. Although there is limited evidence to guide the optimal preventive measures, we recommend antiviral prophylaxis in HBsAg-positive patients receiving novel treatments, including Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors, B-cell lymphoma 2 inhibitors, and CAR-T cell therapy. Further studies are needed to determine the risk of HBV reactivation with these agents and the best prophylactic strategy.

Prevalence of Hepatitis B Virus, Hepatitis C Virus, and HIV Infections in Hemodialysis Patients at Kano Kidney Center.

Background Hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infections are more prevalent in hemodialysis patients compared to the general population. The objective of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of HBV, HCV, and HIV infections in hemodialysis patients dialyzing regularly at Kano Kidney Center (KKC) in the Eastern Health Cluster of Saudi Arabia in 2022. Methods This retrospective study included all hemodialysis patients who were dialyzed regularly at KKC during 2022. Their electronic medical records were reviewed for the results of HBV, HCV, and HIV along with the patient's demographics, comorbid conditions, and dialysis history. The study was approved and monitored by the Institutional Review Board of Dammam Medical Complex. Results A total of 239 regular hemodialysis patients were included, consisting of 142 males and 97 females (59.41% and 40.59%, respectively), with a mean age of 52.71±15.83 years. Most of the patients were Saudis (156 patients, 65.27%) with the non-Saudi patients being composed mostly of Arabian patients.Nine patients (3.77%) tested positive forhepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), the serologic hallmark of HBV infection. Two patients (0.84%) had resolved HBV infections as evidenced by positive hepatitis B core antibody (anti-HBc) and hepatitis B surface antibody (anti-HBs). However, the majority (226 patients, 94.56%) were never tested for anti-HBc. Anti-HBs, which can imply long-term immunity against HBV from prior immunizations or infections, were positive in 165 patients (69.04%). A protective anti-HBs level of ≥ 10 IU/L was detected in 158 patients (66.11%) including 104 patients (43.51%) having ≥ 100 IU/L. Eighteen patients (7.53%) had reactive HCV antibodies. Four patients (1.67%) had chronic HCV infection as they had detectable HCV RNA. The remaining 14 patients (5.86%) cleared HCV either spontaneously (seven patients, 2.93%) or by medications (seven patients, 2.93%). HIV screening tests were negative in all 239 patients (100%). HBsAg-positive patients did not have any statistically significant differences from HBsAg-negative patients. On the other hand, the patients who were positive for HCV antibodies were older than the patients who were negative for HCV antibodies (60.66 vs 52.05 years on average, p-value <0.05). They also contained a statistically larger proportion of non-Saudi patients than the patients with no evidence of prior infections (61.11% vs 32.13%, p-value <0.05). Conclusions The study found that the prevalence of HBV and HCV infections among hemodialysis patients in KKC at 3.77% and 1.67%, respectively, is higher than that reported in the general populationin Saudi Arabia, with non-Saudis having a higher prevalence rate of HCV infection than Saudis.However, the current prevalence rate is lower compared to the previous studies that were conducted in Saudi Arabia in the first decade of the 21st century, and there were no cases of HIV infections. Nevertheless, a significant proportion of patients had unprotective or negative anti-HBs antibody titers, indicating the need for strict vaccination protocols and monitoring of antibody titers to ensure optimal protection.

#5256 REACTIVATION OF HEPATITIS B VIRUS IN KIDNEY TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS WITH RESOLVED INFECTION: A SINGLE-CENTER EXPERIENCE

Abstract Background and Aims Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) frequently present serologic evidence of previous contact with hepatitis B virus (HBV). Although uncommon, HBV reactivation after kidney transplantation (KT) may cause serious complications and adverse outcomes in these patients. However, data regarding risk factors for reactivation are still scarce. This study aims to describe a cohort of patients with resolved HBV infection who showed reactivation of the virus after KT. Method Retrospective cohort study including patients with resolved HBV infection who underwent KT between August 2007 and December 2021. Resolved HBV infection was defined as being seronegative to HB surface antigen (HBsAg) and seropositive to HB core antibody (HBcAb), regardless of HB surface antibody (HBsAb) status. HBV reactivation after KT was defined as seropositivity to HBsAg or presence of HBV-DNA in the serum (viraemia). Preemptive prophylactic entecavir was not used. Demographic and clinical data were collected from the electronic records. Results A total of 104 patients (70.2% male) were included with a mean age of 52±10 years. Prior to KT, 93.3% were seropositive to HBsAb. Seropositivity to other viruses was present in 18 patients: human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) alone in 5 patients, hepatitis C virus (HCV) alone in 11 patients and coinfection in 2 patients. Deceased-donor KT was performed in 94.2% and only 9 patients had had a previous KT. Rituximab was used as induction immunosuppressive therapy in 13 patients. Median follow-up time after KT was 75 months (IQR 37-115). HBV reactivation occurred in 6 patients with a median time after KT of 5 months (IQR 3-11.5). At reactivation diagnosis, median HBsAg titer was 83.2 (IQR 34-784.5; reference range &amp;lt; 1) and median viral load was 6.7 × 106 copies/mL (IQR 0.4 × 106-378 × 106). Only one patient presented seropositivity to HBsAg without viraemia. Half of these patients were seropositive to HBsAb prior to KT and became seronegative at reactivation diagnosis. No liver enzyme elevation was registered at reactivation diagnosis. Donor HBcAb status, coinfection with HIV or HCV, Rituximab use and recipient HBsAb status were not associated to HBV reactivation after KT. Two patients with HBV reactivation lost kidney graft function and 2 died during follow-up. Conclusion Hepatitis B virus reactivation is possible after kidney transplantation and may pose major adjustments to the treatment, namely the immunosuppressive therapy. Careful monitoring of hepatitis B virus serology and viraemia could be particularly useful in early diagnosis and prompt approach to its reactivation. Larger and multi-center studies are warranted to identify specific risk factors in this population and prevent reactivation.

Efficacy and safety of chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy in relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma with different HBV status: a retrospective study from a single center.

Chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) therapy is an effective salvage treatment in relapsed or refractory(r/r) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), but the impact of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection has not been studied. Here, 51 patients with r/r DLBCL receiving CAR-T therapy were enrolled and analyzed at the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University. The overall response rate and the complete remission rate (CR) of CAR-T therapy were 74.5% and 39.2%, respectively. With a median follow-up of 21.1 months after CAR-T, the probabilities of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) at 36 months were 43.4% and 28.7%, respectively. These patients were divided into three cohorts including chronic HBV infection group (n=6), resolved HBV infection group (n=25) and non-HBV infection group (n=20). Bone marrow involvement was significantly higher in the HBV infection group(P<0.001), other basic characteristics before CAR-T therapy were comparable. Subgroup analysis showed that HBV infection status did not affect the efficacy of CAR-T therapy in CR rate, OS or PFS, and there was no significant difference in CAR-T related toxicities between three cohorts. Only one cirrhosis patient with chronic HBV infection experienced HBV reactivation. CAR-T therapy was effective and can be used safely in r/r DLBCL with HBV infection under proper monitoring and antiviral prophylaxis.

Safety of secukinumab in the treatment of patients with axial spondyloarthritis and concurrent hepatitis B virus infection or latent tuberculosis infection.

To evaluate the safety of secukinumab (SEC) in the treatment of patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) and concurrent hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection or latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI). This is a retrospective cohort study. Adult axSpA patients with HBV infection or LTBI receiving SEC treatment for at least 3months from March 2020 to July 2022 in Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital were included. Patients were screened for HBV infection and LTBI before SEC treatment. During follow-up, reactivation of HBV infection and LTBI was monitored. Relevant data were collected and analyzed. A total of 43 axSpA patients with HBV infection or LTBI were included, of whom 37 were with HBV infection, 6 were with LTBI. Six out of thirty-seven (16.2%) patients with axSpA and concurrent HBV infection exhibited HBV reactivation after 9.0 ± 5.7months of SEC treatment. Among them, 3 patients had chronic HBV infection and received anti-HBV prophylaxis, 2 patients had chronic HBV infection but did not receive anti-HBV prophylaxis, and 1 patient had occult HBV infection and did not receive antiviral prophylaxis. None of the 6 axSpA patients with LTBI developed reactivation of LTBI, whether received anti-TB prophylaxis or not. HBV reactivation can occur in axSpA patients with different types of HBV infection undergoing SEC treatment, whether receive antiviral prophylaxis or not. Close monitoring of HBV reactivation in axSpA patients with HBV infection undergoing SEC treatment is mandatory. Anti-HBV prophylaxis may be beneficial. In contrast, SEC may be safe in axSpA patients with LTBI, even in patients not receiving anti-TB prophylaxis. Key Points •Currently, most evidence about the safety of SEC in patients with HBV infection and LTBI were from patients with psoriasis. Our study adds data about the safety of SEC in Chinese axSpA patients with concurrent HBV infection or LTBI in real-world clinical setting. •Our study showed that HBV reactivation can occur in axSpA patients with different types of HBV infection undergoing SEC treatment, whether receive antiviral prophylaxis or not. •Close monitoring of serum HBV markers, HBV DNA load, and liver function is mandatory in axSpA patients with chronic, occult, and resolved HBV infection undergoing SEC treatment. Anti-HBV prophylaxis may be beneficial in all HBsAg-positive patients and HBsAg-negative, HBcAb-positive patients at high risk of HBV reactivation who are receiving SEC therapy. •None of the axSpA patients with LTBI, whether received anti-TB prophylaxis or not, developed reactivation of LTBI in our study. SEC may be safe in axSpA patients with LTBI, even in patients not receiving anti-TB prophylaxis.

Diversity and composition of gut microbiota in healthy individuals and patients at different stages of hepatitis B virus-related liver disease

BackgroundHepatitis B virus (HBV) causes chronic hepatitis B (CHB), liver cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma. The evolution of human gut microbiota during the progression of HBV-related liver diseases remains unclear. Therefore, we prospectively enrolled patients with HBV-related liver diseases and healthy individuals. Through 16S ribosomal RNA amplicon sequencing, we characterized the gut microbiota of the participants and predicted the functions of microbial communities.ResultsWe analyzed the gut microbiota of 56 healthy controls and 106 patients with HBV-related liver disease [14 with resolved HBV infection, 58 with CHB, and 34 with advanced liver disease (15 with liver cirrhosis and 19 with hepatocellular carcinoma)]. Patients with HBV-related liver disease exhibited a higher degree of bacterial richness (all P < 0.05) than did healthy controls. Beta diversity analyses revealed a distinct clustering pattern between healthy controls and patients with HBV-related liver disease (all P < 0.05). The composition of bacteria (from the phylum level to the genus level) varied across the stages of liver disease. Linear discriminant analysis effect size revealed multiple taxa that differ significantly in abundance between healthy controls and patients with HBV-related liver disease; however, fewer differences were observed among patients with resolved HBV infection, those with CHB, and those with advanced liver disease. The ratio of Firmicutes to Bacteroidetes was increased in all three patient groups compared with the ratio in healthy controls (all P < 0.001). The analysis of the sequencing data by using PICRUSt2 revealed the changes in microbial functions with disease progression.ConclusionsThe diversity and composition of gut microbiota appear to vary significantly between healthy controls and patients at different stages of HBV-related liver disease. The understanding of gut microbiota may provide novel therapeutic options in these patients.

Risk Stratification for Hepatitis B Virus Reactivation in Kidney Transplant Recipients With Resolved HBV Infection.

The prophylaxis strategy for hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) with resolved HBV infection remains unclear. In this hospital-based retrospective cohort study, consecutive KTRs with resolved HBV infection were screened from the years 2000 through 2020. After excluding confounding conditions, 212 and 45 patients were respectively recruited into Anti-HBs positive and Anti-HBs negative groups. Cumulative incidences of, and subdistribution hazard ratios (SHRs) for HBV reactivation were analyzed after adjusting the competing risk. During a median 8.3 (mean 8.4 ± 4.9) years of follow-up, the 10-year cumulative incidence of HBV reactivation was significantly higher in Anti-HBs negative group when compared to that in Anti-HBs positive group (15.2%, 95% CI: 3.6-26.7 vs. 1.3%, 95% CI: 0.0-3.0; p < 0.001). In multivariable regression analysis, absence of anti-HBs (SHR 14.2, 95% CI: 3.09-65.2; p < 0.001) and use of high-dose steroids, i.e., steroid dose ≥20mg/day of prednisolone equivalent over 4 weeks (SHR 8.96, 95% CI: 1.05-76.2; p = 0.045) were independent risk factors related to HBV reactivation. Accordingly, the 10-year cumulative incidence of HBV reactivation occurring in patients with two, one and zero risk factors was 42.7% (95% CI: 0.0-87.1), 7.9% (95% CI: 1.2-14.7) and 0%, respectively (p < 0.001). In conclusion, the strategy of HBV antiviral prophylaxis may be defined according to the risk stratification.

Risk of hepatitis B virus reactivation during immunosuppressive treatment.

In this study, we aimed to rate Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) reactivation, risk factors for reactivation and compare the efficacy of prophylactic antiviral therapy in patients who initiated immunosuppressive therapy. A total of 177 patients with Chronic Hepatitis B or resolved HBV infection who had received immunosuppressive treatment were analyzed in this retrospective study. Demographic features, relevant liver tests, prophylactic treatment type, duration of treatment, transaminase levels and HBV serology and clinical conditions were recorded from all patients who received prophylactic treatment. Eleven reactivation occurred in all groups. The mean age of patients who developed reactivation was statistically significantly lower (p=0.049). Three (27.3%) of the patients were male and 8 (72.7%) were female (p=0.66). Eight (36.36%) of 22 HB surface antigen (HBsAg) positive patients developed reactivation, 3 (155%) of 155 HBsAg negative patients developed reactivation. HBsAg positivity was determined as a risk factor for reactivation (p<0.001). There was no significant difference neither in reactivation, nor in the type of antiviral treatment (p=0.2) according to anti-HBs serology (p=0.366). As a result, early age, baseline HBsAg positivity, moderate risk group, baseline HBV DNA positivity were associated with reactivation. Gender, immunosuppressive therapy type, preemptive antiviral therapy type, and anti-HBs titers were not associated with reactivation.

HBV reactivation in patients with chronic or resolved HBV infection following BCMA-targeted CAR-T cell therapy.

B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-targeted chimeric antigen receptor-T cell (CAR-T) therapy is used for refractory or relapsed multiple myeloma (r/r MM). Concern of the safety and efficacy of CAR-T cell therapy in patients with chronic or resolved HBV infection is raised. In this study, we retrospectively reviewed 99 patients with r/r MM treated with BCMA-targeted CAR-T cell therapy, of which 7 (7.1%) patients had chronic HBV infection, 43 (43.4%) with resolved HBV infection, and the remaining 49 (49.49%) HBV-uninfected. Patients' characteristics before CAR-T cell administration were comparable in different status of HBV infection. Patients' liver function, cytokine levels, CAR-T cell expansion and cytokine release syndrome (CRS) grade after CAR-T cell therapy did not differ in different HBV serologic status. Furthermore, chronic HBV infection or resolved HBV infection did not affect clinical response, progress-free survival (PFS), or overall survival (OS). Four (4.04%) patients experienced HBV reactivation, 3 (6.98%) with resolved HBV infection, and 1 (14.29%) chronic HBV infection. Of 4 patients with HBV reactivation, 2 cases (50%) of severe hepatitis were noted and reported. Drops of serum IgG and elevation of alanine aminotransferase (ALT), alanine aminotransferase (AST), total bilirubin (TB) were observed in all four patients around the date of HBV reactivation.