Resolute Zotarolimus-eluting Stent Research Articles

Selection Criteria in the Era of Perfect Competition for Drug-Eluting Stents in Association With Operator Volumes: An Operator-Volume Analysis of the Selection DES Study.

This study aimed to explore the factors influencing the drug-eluting stent (DES) selection criteria of cardiologists in association with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) volumes and to determine whether they value further DES improvements and modifications. The survey was conducted on a group of cardiologist operators from April 10 to 30, 2023. The analysis included 126 operators who answered the questions. Of these, low-, intermediate-, and high-volume operators accounted for 49 (38.9%), 47 (37.3%), and 30 (23.8%), respectively. Overall, Xience™ everolimus-eluting stent (CoCr-EES) was most frequently used, with > 70% of cardiologists using it in > 20% of their PCI practice. The percentage of selection by low-, intermediate-, and high-volume operators among the DESs used demonstrated no difference, except for dual-therapy sirolimus-eluting and CD34+ antibody-coated Combo® stent (DTS). Logistic regression analysis revealed that low-volume operators are less likely to be affected in terms of company/sales representative (odds ratio (OR): 0.402, P = 0.031) and bending lesions (OR: 0.339, P = 0.037) for selecting DES. Low-volume operators less frequently selected Resolute Onyx™ zotarolimus-eluting stents (OR: 0.689, P = 0.043) and DTS (Drug-Eluting Stents) (OR: 0.361, P = 0.006) for PCI. The current study results indicate that patient background, DES performance, and product specifications were not criteria for DES selection in cardiologists with different PCI volumes in routine PCI.

Final 5-year report of BIONYX comparing the thin-composite wire-strut zotarolimus-eluting stent versus ultrathin-strut sirolimus-eluting stent.

The BIONYX randomized trial is the first study to evaluate the Resolute Onyx durable polymer-coated zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES) in all-comers. Furthermore, it is the first trial to assess safety and efficacy of this stent versus the Orsiro biodegradable-polymer sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) in all-comers, paying particular attention to patients with diabetes. It has previously shown promising results until 3 years of follow-up. We aimed to assess long-term clinical outcome after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with Onyx ZES versus Orsiro SES at 5-year follow-up. The main composite endpoint was target vessel failure (TVF): cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction,or target vessel revascularization. Time to primary and secondary endpoints was assessed using Kaplan-Meier methods, applying the log-rank test for between-group comparison. Follow-up was available in 2414/2488 (97.0%) patients. After 5 years, TVF showed no significant difference between Onyx ZES and Orsiro SES (12.7% vs. 13.7%, hazard ratio [HR]0.94, 95%confidence interval [CI][0.75-1.17], plog-rank = 0.55). Landmark analysis between 3- and 5-year follow-up found a lower target lesion revascularization rate for Onyx ZES (1.1% vs. 2.4%, HR 0.47, 95%CI[0.24-0.93], plog-rank = 0.026). A prespecified subgroup analysis showed no significant between-stent difference in clinical outcome among patients with diabetes. After treatment with Onyx ZES, patients aged ≥75 years had significantly lower rates of TVF (13.8% vs. 21.9%, HR 0.60, 95%CI[0.39-0.93], plog-rank = 0.023). The final 5-year analysis of the randomized BIONYX trial showed favorable and similar long-term outcomes of safety and efficacy for Onyx ZES and Orsiro SES in both all-comers and patients with diabetes.

B-16 | The RESOLUTE ONYX Bifurcation Study: 3-Year Outcomes in Patients With Coronary Bifurcation Lesions

Coronary bifurcation lesions are challenging to treat, with higher risk of procedural complications and adverse events than non-bifurcation lesions. In this study, we evaluated the 3-year clinical outcomes in patients with bifurcation lesions treated with the Resolute Onyx zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES). Patients with a single bifurcation target lesion undergoing planned treatment using the provisional stenting technique were enrolled at 25 centers in the United States and Europe. Inclusion criteria included main branch reference vessel diameter (RVD) 2.25-5.0 mm, lesion length ≤35 mm, stenosis ≥50%, side branch ≥2.0 mm, and TIMI flow ≥2. The primary endpoint was target vessel failure (TVF) at 1-year. Follow-up was for 3 years. Between Apr 2017 to Dec 2019, 205 patients with 209 bifurcation lesions (of 267 total) were enrolled. Patients were 66.6 ± 10.7yrs, 21.5% female, 26.3% type II diabetic, 35.1% had previous PCI. Core lab analysis showed that 32.5% of lesions were true bifurcation lesions per Medina classification (1.1.1, 1.0.1, 0.1.1). Target vessel RVD was 2.65 ± 0.47 mm and lesion length was 17.03 ± 9.64 mm. 12.1% of patients had TVF through 3 years. There were no instances of stent thrombosis (Figure). Patients with coronary bifurcation lesions treated with the Resolute Onyx ZES had favorable long-term clinical outcomes at 3 years, with only 6% of target lesion revascularization and no cases of stent thrombosis. These results support the use of Resolute Onyx ZES to treat complex coronary bifurcation lesions using a planned provisional stenting technique, safely and effectively.

Comparison of Different Types of Drug-Eluting Stents for De Novo Long Coronary Artery Lesions.

Outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention for diffuse long lesions remain relatively unfavorable. Prior clinical trials investigated the relative efficacy and safety of different types of drug-eluting stents (DES) in long lesions. This study sought to compare the relative performance of different types of DES for de novo long (≥25mm) coronary artery lesions. Using a pooled analysis of individual data of 1,450 patients from 3 randomized clinical trials, we compared angiographic and clinical outcomes of 5 different types of DES: 224 patients with cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stents (EES), 255 with platinum-chromium EES, 250 with Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stents, 245 with biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting stents, and 476 with first-generation sirolimus-eluting stents (SES). The primary endpoint was in-segment late lumen loss at 9months. The primary endpoint was not significantly different between 4 second-generation DES and 1 first-generation SES (0.17 ± 0.41mm in cobalt-chromium EES; 0.11 ± 0.37 in platinum-chromium EES: 0.14 ± 0.38 in Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stents; 0.14 ± 0.38 in biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting stents; or 0.10 ± 0.37 in SES, respectively, overall P = 0.38). Also, there were no significant between-group differences with respect to death, myocardial infarction, target-vessel revascularization, or stent thrombosis at 12months. In the multiple treatment propensity-score analysis, the risk of angiographic and clinical outcomes was also similar among several types of DES. In this patient-level pooled analysis, several second-generation DES showed similar angiographic and clinical outcomes in patients with de novo long coronary lesions. (Percutaneous Treatment of LONG Native Coronary Lesions With Drug-Eluting Stent-III [LONG-DES-III]; NCT01078038; Percutaneous Treatment of LONG Native Coronary Lesions With Drug-Eluting Stent-IV [LONG-DES-IV]; NCT01186094; and Everolimus-eluting [PROMUS-ELEMENT] vs. Biolimus A9-Eluting [NOBORI] Stents for Long-Coronary Lesions [LONG-DES-V]; NCT01186120).

Polymer-Based Versus Polymer-Free Stents in High Bleeding Risk Patients: Final 2-Year Results From Onyx ONE.

Resolute Onyx polymer-based zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZES) were noninferior in safety and effectiveness to BioFreedom polymer-free biolimus A9-coated stents (DCS) in high-bleeding-risk (HBR) patients treated with 1-month dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) followed by single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) at 1 year. This study reports the final 2-year results of the randomized Onyx ONE trial. The Onyx ONE (A Randomized Controlled Trial With Resolute Onyx in One Month Dual Antiplatelet Therapy (DAPT) for High-Bleeding Risk Patients) trial randomly assigned HBR patients to treatment with ZES or DCS. Following 1-month DAPT, event-free patients received SAPT (either aspirin or a P2Y12 inhibitor at physician discretion). The primary safety endpoint, a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or stent thrombosis at 1 year, was determined at 1 year. Rates of primary and secondary endpoints were calculated after final follow-up at 2 years. A total of 1,003 patients were randomly allocated to ZES and 993 patients to DCS. Follow-up was complete in 980 (97.7%) ZES patients and 962 (96.9%) DCS patients at 2 years. The primary safety endpoint occurred in 208 (21.2%) patients in the ZES group and 199 (20.7%) patients in the DCS group (risk difference: 0.5%; 95%CI: -3.1% to 4.2%; P=0.78) at 2 years without significant differences in individual components of the composite endpoint. The secondary effectiveness endpoint occurred in 217 (22.1%) patients in the ZES group and 202 (21.0%) patients in the DCS group (risk difference: 1.1%; 95%CI: -2.5% to 4.8%; P=0.54). Among patients at HBR treated with 1-month DAPT followed by SAPT, the Resolute Onyx polymer-based ZES had similar 2-year outcomes for the primary safety and secondary effectiveness endpoint compared with the BioFreedom polymer-free DCS. (A Randomized Controlled Trial With Resolute Onyx in One Month Dual Antiplatelet Therapy [DAPT] for High-Bleeding Risk Patients [Onyx ONE]; NCT03344653).

A-13 | One Month DAPT in High Bleeding Risk ACS Patients: 2-year Subgroup Analysis from Onyx ONE Clear

The safety and efficacy of Resolute Onyx zotarolimus-eluting stents in high bleeding risk (HBR) patients with 1-month dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) was previously demonstrated. This subgroup analysis examines 2-year outcomes in ACS and non-ACS patients in the Onyx ONE Clear study.

B-25 | Two-Year Outcomes in Patients with Bifurcation Lesions treated with Resolute ONYX ZES: Final Results from the RESOLUTE ONYX Bifurcation Study

Bifurcations are a challenging lesion subset for percutaneous coronary intervention. In the RESOLUTE ONYX Bifurcation study, we evaluated the 2-year clinical outcomes of patients with bifurcation lesions treated with the Resolute Onyx zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES).

Comparison of Contemporary Drug-Eluting Stents in Patients Undergoing Complex High-Risk Indicated Procedures.

Limited data are available on the relative performances of diverse contemporary drug-eluting stents (DES) in patients undergoing complex high-risk indicated procedures (CHIP). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of contemporary second-generation DES for CHIP patients in "real-world" settings. Of 28,843 patients enrolled in the IRIS-DES registry, a total of 6,645 patients with CHIP characteristics who received 5 different types of contemporary DES were finally included: 3,752 with cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stents (CoCr-EES), 1,258 with Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stents (Re-ZES), 864 with platinum-chromium EES (PtCr-EES), 437 with ultrathin strut biodegradable-polymer sirolimus-eluting stents (UT-SES), and 334 with bioresorbable polymer SES (BP-SES). The primary outcome was target-vessel failure (a composite of cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction, and target-vessel revascularization) at 12months. At 12months, the rate of target-vessel failure was highest in the CoCr-EES (7.1%) group; intermediate in the Re-ZES (5.0%), PtCr-EES (4.6%), and BP-SES (4.2%) groups; and lowest in the UT-SES (3.8%) group (overall long-rank P=0.001). In multiple-treatment propensity-score analysis, the adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for target-vessel failure were significantly lower in the Re-ZES (HR: 0.71; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.52-0.97), the UT-SES (HR: 0.52; 95%CI: 0.29-0.95), and BP-SES (HR: 0.33; 95%CI: 0.16-0.70) groups than in the CoCr-EES group (referent). In this contemporary PCI registry, we observed the differential risks of target-vessel failure according to various types of contemporary DES in patients with CHIP characteristics. However, owing to inherent selection bias, the results should be considered hypothesis-generating, highlighting the need for further randomized trials. (Evaluation of the First, Second, and New Drug-Eluting Stents in Routine Clinical Practice [IRIS-DES]; NCT01186133).

First Report of 3-Year Clinical Outcome After Treatment With Novel Resolute Onyx Stents in the Randomized BIONYX Trial.

At 1 year, the international randomized BIONYX trial (ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT02508714) established non-inferiority regarding safety and efficacy of the novel Resolute Onyx zotarolimus-eluting stent (RO-ZES) vs. the Orsiro sirolimus-eluting stent (O-SES). Although the RO-ZES is used in daily practice, no clinical results have been published beyond 2 years.Methods and Results:We assessed 3-year clinical outcomes of 2,488 all-comers after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with RO-ZES vs. O-SES. The main endpoint was target vessel failure (TVF), a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction (MI), or target vessel revascularization. Time-to-endpoints was assessed by Kaplan-Meier methods and between-group comparisons by log-rank tests. Follow-up was available in 2,433/2,488 (97.8%) patients. There was no significant between-stent difference in TVF (RO-ZES 112/1,243 [9.2%] vs. O-SES 109/1,245 [8.9%], hazard ratio [HR]: 1.03, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.79-1.34; Plog-rank=0.85) and its individual components. The all-cause mortality was significantly lower after PCI with RO-ZES (3.7% vs.5.4%, HR: 0.67, 95% CI 0.46-0.97; Plog-rank=0.034), but cardiac mortality did not differ significantly (1.1% vs.1.9%, HR: 0.56, 95% CI 0.28-1.11; Plog-rank=0.09). Definite-or-probable stent thrombosis rates were low for both groups (0.6% vs.1.2%, HR: 0.46, 95% CI 0.19-1.14; Plog-rank=0.09). This first 3-year randomized assessment of the RO-ZES showed a favorable rate of TVF that matched the outcomes of patients treated with O-SES. We observed a lower rate of all-cause death in the RO-ZES group, but long-term clinical follow-up is of interest.

Clinical outcomes according to lesion complexity in high bleeding risk patients treated with 1-month dual antiplatelet therapy following PCI: Analysis from the Onyx ONE clear study.

To compare clinical outcomes in high bleeding risk (HBR) patients with and without complex percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) treated with Resolute Onyx zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZES) after 1-month dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). PCI with 1-month DAPT has been demonstrated to be safe in HBR patients treated with Resolute Onyx ZES. Whether these outcomes are consistent in patients with complex lesions is uncertain. Among HBR patients who were event-free 1month after PCI with ZES and treated thereafter with single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT), the clinical outcomes between 1 month and 1 year were compared after complex PCI (3 vessels treated, ≥ 3 lesions treated, total stent length > 60 mm, bifurcation with ≥ 2 stents implanted, atherectomy, or left main, surgical bypass graft or chronic total occlusion PCI) versus noncomplex PCI. Propensity score adjustment was performed to adjust for baseline differences among complex and noncomplex patients. Complex patients (N=401, 26.6% of total) had a higher prevalence of hyperlipidemia, diabetes mellitus and previous myocardial infarction (MI). Between 1 month and 1 year, rates of MI (7.1% vs. 4.0%, p=0.02) and cardiac death/MI (9.3% vs. 6.1%, p=0.04) were higher among complex versus noncomplex patients, although stent thrombosis rates were similar. After adjustment for baseline characteristics, differences in outcomes were no longer significant between groups. Higher rates of ischemic outcomes in complex PCI patients were largely explained by baseline clinical differences, rather than lesion complexity, among HBR patients treated with 1-month DAPT following PCI with Resolute Onyx ZES.

Effectiveness and Safety of Contemporary Drug-Eluting Stents in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus.

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a well-known risk factor for adverse cardiovascular events in patients receiving percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Limited data are available on the relative performance of different types of contemporary drug-eluting stents (DES) for diabetic patients. The authors investigated the effectiveness and safety profiles of several contemporary DES in patients with DM in a "real-world" clinical setting. Among 24,516 patients enrolled in a multicenter, prospective registry, 7,823 patients with DM were treated with 4 contemporary DES: 2,877 with a cobalt chromium everolimus-eluting stent (EES), 789 with a biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting stent, 2,286 with a platinum chromium-EES, and 1,871 with a Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stent. The primary outcome was target vessel failure (TVF) (a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization). The median follow-up duration was 2.9 years. Observed 3-year rates of TVF were not significantly different according to different DES types. On multigroup propensity-score analysis, the adjusted HRs for TVF were similar in between-group comparisons: biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting stent (HR: 0.94; 95%CI: 0.76-1.16; P=0.57), platinum chromium-EES (HR: 0.94; 95%CI: 0.81-1.09; P=0.41), and Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stent (HR: 1.01; 95%CI: 0.86-1.18; P=0.93) compared with the cobalt chromium-EES (reference). This trend was maintained in patients with non-insulin- and insulin-treated DM. In this multicenter clinical-practice PCI registry, no significant between-group differences were found for a 3-year risk of TVF in patients with DM undergoing PCI with various types of contemporary DES. (Evaluation of the First, Second, and New Drug-Eluting Stents in Routine Clinical Practice [IRIS-DES]; NCT01186133).

Five-Year Comparative Efficacy of Everolimus-Eluting vs. Resolute Zotarolimus-Eluting Stents in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Among drug-eluting stents (DESs), the durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent (EES) and resolute zotarolimus-eluting stent (R-ZES) are widely used in clinical practice and have contributed to improve the outcomes of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Few studies addressed their long-term comparative performance in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). We aimed to investigate the 5 year comparative efficacy of EES and R-ZES in ACS. We queried ACTION-ACS, a large-scale database of ACS patients undergoing PCI. The treatment groups were analyzed using propensity score matching. The primary endpoint was a composite of mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, repeat PCI, and definite or probable stent thrombosis, which was addressed at the five-year follow-up. A total of 3497 matched patients were analyzed. Compared with R-ZES, a significant reduction in the primary endpoint at 5 years was observed in patients treated with EES (hazard ratio (HR) [95%CI] = 0.62 [0.54–0.71], p < 0.001). By landmark analysis, differences between the two devices emerged after the first year and were maintained thereafter. The individual endpoints of mortality (HR [95%CI] = 0.70 [0.58–0.84], p < 0.01), MI (HR [95%CI] = 0.55 [0.42–0.74], p < 0.001), and repeat PCI (HR [95%CI] = 0.65 [0.53–0.73], p < 0.001) were all significantly lower in the EES-treated patients. Stroke risk did not differ between EES and R-ZES. In ACS, a greater long-term clinical efficacy with EES vs. R-ZES was observed. This difference became significant after the first year of the ACS episode and persisted thereafter.

Comparison of the 9-Month Intrastent Condition and 30-Month Clinical Outcomes After Resolute Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation Between Standard-Duration and 1-Month Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Followed by Prasugrel Monotherapy.

Background: In this study we investigated the efficacy and safety of very short duration (1-month) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) followed by prasugrel monotherapy. In particular, we compared intrastent conditions using optical coherence tomography (OCT) after second-generation drug-eluting stent implantation between standard-duration and 1-month DAPT followed by prasugrel monotherapy.Methods and Results: Between May 2015 and February 2018, 120 consecutive patients who underwent elective Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stent implantation were enrolled and divided into those receiving standard-duration or 1-month (1M) DAPT followed by prasugrel monotherapy; 47 patients (n=55 stents) and 46 patients (n=54 stents) in the standard and 1M groups, respectively, completed the protocol. The primary endpoint was the prevalence of abnormal intrastent tissue at the 9-month examination, as observed by OCT. The secondary endpoint was the presence of composite adverse events, including all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, target lesion and vessel revascularization, and major and minor bleeding. The prevalence of abnormal intrastent tissue was similar between the standard and 1M groups (1.6% vs. 1.5%, respectively; non-inferiority P<0.01). There was a tendency for fewer composite events in the 1M than standard group at the 30-month follow-up examination (28.3% vs. 44.7%, respectively; P=0.41).Conclusions: In conclusion, 1M DAPT followed by prasugrel monotherapy after second-generation drug-eluting stent implantation was not inferior to standard-duration DAPT in terms of intrastent thrombus formation and composite adverse events.

Treating diabetic all-comers with contemporary drug-eluting stents: Prespecified comparisons from the BIO-RESORT and the BIONYX randomized trials

BackgroundPatients with diabetes have more extensive coronary disease, resulting in higher risks of adverse clinical events following stenting. In all-comer patients, contemporary DES have shown excellent safety and efficacy, but data on diabetic patients are scarce. Separately for the BIO-RESORT and BIONYX trials, we assessed the 2-year clinical outcomes of diabetic patients, treated with various contemporary drug-eluting stents (DES). MethodsWe performed two prespecified secondary analyses of two randomized DES trials, which both stratified for diabetes. The main endpoint was target vessel failure (TVF), a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization. Follow-up was finished before the COVID-19 pandemic. ResultsIn BIO-RESORT, 624/3514 (17.8%) had diabetes: 211 received Orsiro sirolimus-eluting stents (SES), 203 Synergy everolimus-eluting stents (EES), and 210 Resolute Integrity zotarolimus-eluting stents (RI-ZES). TVF did not differ between SES (10.2%) and EES (10.0%) versus RI-ZES (12.7%) (SES vs. RI-ZES HR:0.78, 95%-CI [0.44–1.40]; p = 0.40, EES vs. RI-ZES HR:0.79, 95%-CI [0.44–1.40]; p = 0.42). In BIONYX, 510/2488 (20.5%) patients had diabetes: 250 received SES and 260 Resolute Onyx zotarolimus-eluting stents (RO-ZES). There was no difference in TVF between SES (10.7%) versus RO-ZES (12.2%) (HR:0.88, 95%-CI [0.52–1.48]; p = 0.63). ConclusionsThere was no difference in 2-year clinical outcome among patients with diabetes, who were treated with SES, or EES, versus RI-ZES. In addition there was no difference in clinical outcome in diabetic patients, who were treated with SES versus RO-ZES. These findings may be considered as a signal of safety and efficacy of the studied DES in patients with diabetes.

Thin Composite-Wire-Strut Zotarolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Ultrathin-Strut Sirolimus-Eluting Stents in BIONYX at 2 Years

ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to assess 2-year safety and efficacy of the current-generation thin composite-wire-strut durable-polymer Resolute Onyx zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES), compared with the ultrathin-strut biodegradable-polymer Orsiro sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) in all-comers and a pre-specified small-vessel subgroup analysis. BackgroundThe Resolute Onyx ZES is widely used in clinical practice, but no follow-up data beyond 1 year have been published. The randomized BIONYX (Bioresorbable Polymer-Coated Orsiro Versus Durable Polymer-Coated Resolute Onyx Stents) trial (NCT02508714) established the noninferiority of ZES versus SES regarding target vessel failure (TVF) rates. MethodsA total of 2,488 all-comer patients were treated at 7 coronary intervention centers in Belgium, Israel, and the Netherlands. The main endpoint, TVF, was a composite of safety (cardiac death or target vessel–related myocardial infarction) and efficacy (clinically indicated target vessel revascularization). Two-year follow-up data were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methods. ResultsTwo-year follow-up data were available for 2,460 of 2,488 patients (98.9%). TVF occurred in 93 of 1,243 patients (7.6%) assigned to ZES versus 87 of 1,245 patients (7.1%) assigned to SES (log-rank p = 0.66). There was no significant between-stent difference in individual components of this endpoint. The incidence of definite-or-probable stent thrombosis was low for both treatment arms (0.4% vs. 1.1%; log-rank p = 0.057). In patients stented in small vessels, there was no between-stent difference (TVF 8.2% vs. 8.7% [log-rank p = 0.75], target lesion revascularization 4.0% vs. 4.4% [log-rank p = 0.77]). ConclusionsAt 2-year follow-up, the novel thin composite-wire-strut durable-polymer Resolute Onyx ZES showed in all-comers similar safety and efficacy compared with the ultrathin cobalt-chromium-strut biodegradable-polymer Orsiro SES. The analysis of patients who were treated in small vessels also suggested no advantage for either stent.

ONE MONTH DUAL ANTIPLATELET THERAPY IN HIGH BLEEDING RISK PATIENTS: PRIMARY RESULTS FROM THE ONYX ONE CLEAR STUDY

High bleeding risk (HBR) patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention may require shorter durations of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). The randomized Onyx ONE trial compared the Resolute Onyx zotarolimus-eluting stent with a polymer-free drug-coated stent in HBR patients with 1-month

EVEROLIMUS-ELUTING XIENCE PRIME/X PEDITION VERSUS ZOTAROLIMUS-ELUTING RESOLUTE INTEGRITY STENTS IN PATIENTS WITH DIABETES MELLITUS AND SMALL VESSEL DISEASE: AN ANALYSIS FROM THE 2-YEAR PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED COPERES STUDY

This study sought to compare Xience Prime/ X-pedition everolimus-eluting stents (EES) versus Resolute Integrity zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZES) in terms of patient- or stent-related clinical outcomes with DM or small vessel disease. PCI of small vessels or patient with DM is limited by an increased

Clinical outcomes of contemporary drug-eluting stents in patients with and without diabetes mellitus: Multigroup propensity-score analysis using data from stent-specific, multicenter, prospective registries.

Whether the diabetic status differentially affects the clinical outcomes with different drug-eluting stents (DES) has been controversial. From stent-specific, prospective DES registries, we evaluated 17,184 patients (11,428 in non-diabetics and 5,756 in diabetics) who received several contemporary DES: 3570 sirolimus-eluting stents (SES), 5,023 cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stents (CoCr-EES), 2,985 platinum-chromium EES (PtCr-EES), 2,913 Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stents (Re-ZES), and 2,693 biodegradable-polymer biolimus-eluting stents (BP-BES). The primary outcome was patient-oriented composite endpoint (POCE, a composite of all-cause death, any myocardial infarction, and any revascularization) at 3-year follow-up and target-vessel failure (a composite of cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction, and target-vessel revascularization) at 3 years was also evaluated. In non-diabetics, the rates of POCE were not significantly different (CoCr-EES 14.3%, PtCr-EES 13.0%, Re-ZES 14.3%, BP-BES 13.4%, and SES 14.6%; overall p = .39). In diabetics, similar results were revealed (CoCr-EES 18.4%, PtCr-EES 20.3%, Re-ZES 17.3%, BP-BES 17.7%, and SES 17.8%; overall p = .44). In multiple treatment propensity-score weighting analysis, regardless of the diabetic status, the hazard ratios for POCE between-individual comparison were similar. Target-vessel failure (a composite of cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction, and target-vessel revascularization) was also comparable except the higher ratio of Re-ZES than PtCr-EES (hazard ratio 1.25, 1.26, 95% confidence interval 1.00-1.55, p = .048) in patients without diabetes. In this clinical-practice registry study, regardless the diabetic status, the 3-year rates of the primary outcome were similar among different types of DES, suggesting no differential clinical response between contemporary DES in patients with or without diabetes.

Thin, Very Thin, or Ultrathin Strut Biodegradable or Durable Polymer-Coated Drug-Eluting Stents: 3-Year Outcomes of BIO-RESORT

ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to assess the 3-year safety and efficacy of treating all-comer patients with 3 contemporary drug-eluting stents (DES). BackgroundThe BIO-RESORT (Comparison of Biodegradable Polymer and Durable Polymer Drug-Eluting Stents in an All Comers Population) (TWENTE III) randomized trial (NCT01674803) found similar 1-year safety and efficacy for the 2 biodegradable-polymer DES (i.e., ultrathin-strut cobalt-chromium Orsiro sirolimus-eluting stent [SES] and very-thin-strut platinum-chromium Synergy everolimus-eluting stent) compared with the durable-polymer thin-strut cobalt-chromium Resolute Integrity zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES). Two-year follow-up suggested that the SES might reduce repeat revascularizations beyond 1 year compared with the ZES. MethodsA total of 3,514 all-comer patients were treated at 4 centers for coronary intervention. The main clinical endpoint, target vessel failure, was a composite of safety (cardiac death or target vessel–related myocardial infarction) and efficacy (target vessel revascularization). Secondary endpoints included the individual components of target vessel failure and stent thrombosis. ResultsThree-year follow-up data were available for 3,393 of 3,514 patients (96.6%). Target vessel failure occurred in 8.5% with SES and 10.0% with ZES (plog rank = 0.22) and in 8.8% with everolimus-eluting stents (vs. ZES, plog rank = 0.32). Rates of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization were similar between stent groups. Landmark analyses found no statistically significant between-stent difference in repeat revascularization between 1 and 3 years. Definite or probable stent thrombosis rates were low (SES, 1.1%; everolimus-eluting stent, 1.1%; ZES, 0.9%) and similar with all 3 DES. ConclusionsDespite substantial differences in stent backbone and polymer coating, all 3 DES showed favorable 3-year safety and efficacy in all comers, without significant between-stent differences. Further follow-up is required to definitely answer the question of whether one stent might improve clinical outcomes at a later stage.

Long-term (5-year) clinical evaluation of the Resolute zotarolimus-eluting coronary stent: The RESOLUTE US clinical trial.

To assess the long-term safety and efficacy of the Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stent (R-ZES). The R-ZES has been associated with low rates of adverse events over short-intermediate term follow-up. However, reliable assessment of the safety and efficacy of any implanted device requires long-term evaluation. The RESOLUTE US trial was a prospective, observational study conducted at 116 U.S. sites and enrolled patients with de novo coronary lesions. Patients were followed clinically for 5 years with independent event adjudication and data monitoring. A total of 1,402 patients (1,573 lesions) were enrolled; 34% had diabetes mellitus and 75% had ACC type B2/C lesions. The 5-year rate of target lesion failure (TLF) was 12.3%, target lesion revascularization was 6.5%, target vessel myocardial infarction was 3.2%, and cardiac death was 4.1%. Dual antiplatelet therapy usage was 94% at 1 year and 47% at 5 years, with a 0.1% and 0.5% respective incidence of definite or probable stent thrombosis. The 5-year rate of TLF was 16.9% among patients with diabetes mellitus and 14.7% in patients with at least one small (≤2.5 mm) vessel treated. Covariates independently associated with 5-year TLF in multivariable analysis included diabetes mellitus (odds ratio [OR] 1.89, p < .001), prior coronary artery bypass grafting (OR 2.28, p < .001), prior myocardial infarction (OR 1.85, p = .002), and smaller reference vessel diameter (OR 1.75, p = .004). Results from the fully adjudicated and monitored RESOLUTE US trial demonstrate long-term 5-year safety and efficacy of the R-ZES stent among a relatively low-risk population of patients, including a 0.5% rate of stent thrombosis at 5 years.