Resilience Scale Scores Research Articles

THE EFFECT OF PEER EDUCATION ON SLEEP HYGIENE ON SLEEP QUALITY AND PSYCHOLOGICAL RESILIENCE IN UNIVERSITY STUDENTS LIVING IN DORMITORIES

This study was conducted to examine the effect of peer education on sleep hygiene sleep quality and psychological resilience in university students living in dormitories. In the study, a quasi-experimental method with a pretest-posttest control group was used. 240 university students staying at Akyazı Credit and Dormitories Institution in Akyazı district of Sakarya province participated in the study. Half of the students (n=120) formed the intervention group and the other half (n=120) formed the control group. Before the study, 20 students were given sleep hygiene training by the research team. The training group provided peer education to the intervention group on sleep hygiene. No intervention was made in the control group. Student diagnostic form, Sleep Hygiene Index, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, and Brief Psychological Resilience Scale were used as data collection tools. There was no statistically significant difference between the Sleep Hygiene Index and Brief Psychological Resilience Scale score averages of the intervention and control group students included in the study at the beginning and the last interview (p>0.05). However, it was determined that there was an improvement in the sleep hygiene and psychological resilience levels of the students in the intervention group (p0.05). In addition, it was determined that the intervention group had a significant improvement in subjective sleep quality and sleep latency, which are sub-dimensions of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (p

The Influence of Resilience on Outcomes After Total Ankle Arthroplasty.

Resiliency is the ability to recover from stressful events and has been shown to correlate with patient outcomes following certain orthopaedic procedures. The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between resiliency and outcomes following TAA. A retrospective analysis of patients undergoing primary TAA between April 2015 and September 2022 was performed (N = 83). Data included demographics, comorbidities, complications, preoperative and postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) pain and Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) functional scores, Brief Resilience Scale (BRS) scores, and surgical satisfaction. Patients were defined as having low resilience (LR), normal resilience (NR), or high resilience (HR) based on a BRS score of <3, 3-4.30, and >4.3, respectively. High resilience patients had significantly higher postoperative FAAM ADL, Sports, and Overall scores as well as a significantly greater increase from preoperative scores compared with LR and NR patients. Low resilience patients had significantly lower FAAM Sports and Overall scores compared with normal and high resilience patients. BRS scores positively correlated with postoperative FAAM scores. We found no difference in satisfaction or VAS between the 3 cohorts. Multivariate regression analysis identified BRS scores to be an independent predictor for greater changes in FAAM scores following TAA. Although functional improvements following TAA are expected, patients with higher resilience at baseline are more likely to experience greater improvements in functional outcomes following surgery. Level III.

No significant difference in salivary cortisol response on the Trier Social Stress Test-Online based on coffee consumption habits

BackgroundCoffee is widely consumed around the world. In Japan, it is a type of “Shikohin” (consumed for flavor, not nutrition). Several medical studies have reported the beneficial effects of coffee consumption, whereas others suggest that these beneficial effects on psychological aspects are marginal. The habit of consuming large amounts of caffeine through coffee may improve short-term resilience in stressful situations and may exhaust individuals in the long term. We hypothesized that people who habitually drink high amounts of coffee would have lower resilience scores and higher acute stress responses.MethodsAdult Japanese men completed a questionnaire that included a resilience scale and Shikohin consumption habits. Experimental participants were recruited from the survey respondents and classified into three groups based on their coffee consumption per day: No Coffee, Low Coffee, and High Coffee. All participants were asked to join the Trier Social Stress Test-Online (TSST-OL). Subjective stress and salivary cortisol concentrations was measured at eight time points during the experiment. There were 16 participants in each group for the analysis (mean age = 46.10 years, SD = 12.58).ResultsStatistical analysis showed that both subjective stress and salivary cortisol concentrations significantly increased following TSST-OL exposure. However, there were no significant differences among the groups, and the hypotheses were not supported.ConclusionsThis study demonstrated the effectiveness and stability of the TSST-OL. Additionally, coffee consumption habits were not significantly related to resilience scale scores or acute stress responses.

Effects of positive psychology intervention based on the PERMA model on psychological status and quality of life in patients with Parkinson's disease

ObjectiveTo explore the effect of a positive psychology intervention based on the PERMA model on depressive mood and the quality of life of patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). MethodsA total of 60 patients with PD with depression hospitalised between February 2022 and February 2023 were selected using a convenience sampling method. They were divided into a study group (30 cases) and control group (30 cases) using the random number table method. The control group was given routine nursing, whereas the observation group was treated using the PERMA model of positive psychological intervention. The Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS), Parkinson's Disease Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (PDQ-39), Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD), Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA), Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS), and Connor–Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC) scores were collected and compared before and after the intervention, and patient care satisfaction after the intervention was also recorded and compared. ResultsStatistically significant differences were identified in the UPDRS (t = 4.221, p < 0.001), PDQ-39 (t = 5.331, p < 0.001), HAMD (t = 4.298, p < 0.001), HAMA (t = 3.412, p < 0.001), CD-RISC (t = 3.426, p < 0.001), and PANAS (t = 3.432, t = 4.523, p < 0.001) scores. The UPDRS, PDQ-39, HAMD, HAMA, and negative emotion scores in the study group were lower than those in the control group, whereas the CD-RISC and positive emotion scores in the study group were higher than those in the control group. A significant difference in nursing satisfaction was also determined between the two groups (Z = −2.700, p = 0.012), and this result was higher in the study group (93.33 %) than in the control group (73.33 %). ConclusionA positive psychology intervention using the PERMA model can effectively counter the negative psychological states of depression, anxiety, and negative emotion in patients with PD, thereby significantly improving their quality of life, psychological resilience levels, and patient satisfaction.

Care Burden and Psychological Resilience of Mothers Accompanying Their Children with Chronic Illnesses Hospitalized in Pediatric Wards

Abstract Background: Psychological resilience plays a pivotal role in managing the caregiving burden experienced by mothers of hospitalized young children with chronic illnesses. The resilience of these mothers is not only critical for their own mental health but also for the well-being and development of their child. Aim: This study aimed to assess the care burden, psychological resilience, and associated factors of mothers with hospitalized children aged 0-2 years who have chronic diseases. Materials and Methods: The participants included 134 mothers of hospitalized children. Data were gathered utilizing a personal information form, the Zarit Burden Interview, and the Brief Resilience Scale. Results: Working mothers with a bachelor’s degree had higher Zarit Burden Interview scores than non-working mothers. Mothers of children with epilepsy and neurological diseases had higher Zarit Burden Interview scores than those with other chronic diseases. Mothers receiving instrumental and spiritual support had significantly higher Brief Resilience Scale scores. Discussion: Among mothers who accompany their children with a chronic illness diagnosis in the hospital, those who are university graduates, employed, or have children diagnosed with epilepsy and neurological diseases are particularly at risk in terms of the burden of care and psychological resilience. Conclusion: Physicians and especially pediatric nurses can enhance the psychological resilience of these mothers identified as a risk group in this study and alleviate their care burden by providing instrumental and moral support in the clinical setting. The support given to these accompanying mothers can contribute more significantly to the child's quality of life and care.

Effectiveness of spaced education pedagogy in enhancing Nurses' knowledge on emotional resilience-A quasi-experimental trial.

Building resilience among nurses has been postulated as one of the key strategies to support nurses and retain them in the profession. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness, of spaced education pedagogy in enhancing Nurses' knowledge on emotional resilience. Secondary objectives include evaluation of the usability and acceptability of delivery of the training via a mobile application in one's own mobile device. A quasi-experimental study with single group pre-test and post-test trial was conducted. Full-time registered nurses working in an acute care hospital were invited to participate from June 2021 to June 2022. The group used the mobile application daily for 1 month. Pre-test measurement includes socio-demographic data and baseline resilience level before the intervention. Post-test measurement includes resilience level, usability and acceptability of mobile-assisted cognitive-behavioral therapy measured upon completion of the training. The mobile application enabled the delivery of resilience educational content in small quantities through a repeating manner, with a concurrent evaluation of learner's understanding. When compared to their baseline (mean = 24.38, SD = 5.50), participants reported significant increase in the Connor-Davison Resilience Scale score (mean = 26.33, SD = 5.57) (t = -4.40, p < 0.001). Upon 1 month usage of the mobile application, a higher percentage of the participants reported intermediate to high level of resilience (57.4%), as compared to prior usage (54.7%). Respondents reported knowledge of most useful strategies for their daily lives including: (i) managing negative emotions (54.1%); (ii) psychoeducation about mental health and the risks of burnout (44.7%); (iii) achieving work and life balance (43.5%); and (iv) depiction of workplace scenarios to demonstrate what can be and cannot be controlled during times of change (43.5%). Participants reported usability of the mobile application with a mean SUS score 70.5 (SD = 13.0), which was considered "acceptable." Overall, 82.3% of the participants found the mobile application appealing, 64.7% reported they were likely to use the mobile application in the future and 72.9% would recommend it to other nurses. The mobile application provided nurses with the availability and convenience to access resilience building learning content integrated with the spaced education pedagogy. The use of mobile-assisted cognitive behavioral training can aid in increasing nurses' resilience level. Nurses provided acceptable usability ratings and satisfactory acceptance of receiving training via the mobile application, showing promising opportunities in the improvement of overall well-being.

Exploring society‐to‐cells resilience among community members: A multidisciplinary study in outpatient clinics with diverse participant demographics

AbstractAimThis study explores and understands community members' resilience in outpatient clinics, considering various dimensions and types of resilience.DesignA cross‐sectional study.MethodsThis study was conducted in Saudi outpatient clinics from September to December 2023 and included 384 individuals chosen through systematic random sampling. Various tools were used, such as Social Cohesion and Trust Scale, Community Resilience Assessment Tool, Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences, Environmental Resilience Assessment, Economic Resilience Index, Connor‐Davidson Resilience Scale, Brief Resilience Scale, Resilience Scale for Adults and Healthcare Resilience Index.ResultsParticipants displayed a robust overall resilience level, as indicated by Total Connor–Davidson Resilience Scale score of 63.0 ± 9.0. Additionally, they demonstrated commendable levels of resilience in Total Brief Resilience Scale (56.04 ± 8.6), Resilience Scale for Adults (82.5 ± 7.2) and Healthcare Resilience Index (45.8 ± 5.5). These findings offer significant insights into psychological and emotional well‐being of the study population, highlighting their adaptive capacities and coping mechanisms across various life domains.ConclusionThis study provides valuable insights into the multidimensional nature of resilience in outpatient settings. The cross‐sectional design sets the groundwork for future longitudinal investigations, highlighting the need for a holistic approach to understanding and promoting resilience.ImpactThis study holds immediate implications for participants and their communities. It underscores the adaptive capacities and coping mechanisms prevalent in the outpatient population by revealing commendable resilience levels. This insight enhances individuals' psychological and emotional well‐being, contributing positively to the overall resilience and communal strength. Additionally, this study sheds light on how resilience among community members in Saudi Arabia relates to international advanced nursing communities, providing insight into their work.Patient or Public ContributionPatients who have received outpatient services in the past 6 months were purposively chosen to ensure a diverse representation across age, gender and socio‐economic backgrounds in this study.

The Association of Master Adaptive Learning With Less Burnout and More Resilience in Obstetrics and Gynecology Residents.

Medical education should prepare learners for complex and evolving work, and should ideally include the Master Adaptive Learner (MAL) model-meta-learning skills for continuous self-regulated learning. This study aimed to measure obstetrics and gynecology (OB/GYN) residents' MAL attributes, assess associations with burnout and resilience, and explore learning task associations with MAL. OB/GYN residents were surveyed electronically at an in-training examination in January 2022. The survey included demographic information, the 2-item Maslach Burnout Inventory, the 2-item Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale, 4 MAL items (e.g., "I take every opportunity to learn new things"), and questions about training and learning experiences. Of 5,761 residents, 3,741 respondents (65%) were included. A total of 1,478 of 3,386 (39%) demonstrated burnout (responded positive for burnout on emotional exhaustion or depersonalization items). The mean (SD) Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale score was 6.4 (1.2) of a total possible score of 8. The mean (SD) MAL score was 16.3 (2.8) of a total possible score of 20. The MAL score was inversely associated with burnout, with lower MAL scores for residents with (mean [SD] MAL score, 16.5 [2.4]) vs without (mean [SD], 16.0 [2.3]) burnout (P < .001). Higher MAL scores were associated with higher resilience (R = 0.29, P < .001). Higher MAL scores were associated with the statement, "I feel that I was well prepared for my first year of residency" (R = 0.19, P < .001) and a plan to complete subspecialty training after residency (mean [SD] of 16.6 [2.4] for "yes" and 16.2 [2.4] for "no," P < .001). Residents who scored higher on MAL showed more resilience and less burnout. Whether less resilient, burned-out residents did not have the agency to achieve MAL status or whether MAL behaviors filled the resiliency reservoir and protected against burnout is not clear.

Assessing the association between probable posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms and quality of life among emergency service workers using path analysis.

Emergency service workers have highly stressful occupations; the stressors encountered can contribute to the development of mental disorders such as depression, anxiety, and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The present study used a conceptual model and survey to identify variables influencing the association between probable PTSD and quality of life (QOL) in emergency service workers. PTSD was assessed using the Impact of Event Scale-Revised. QOL was assessed using the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey. Path analysis was used to determine whether stress-coping (Brief Coping Orientation to Problems Experienced [Brief COPE] scores), social support (Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support [MSPSS] scores), and resilience (Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale scores) explain the association between probable PTSD and QOL among 220 emergency service workers in Japan. Impact of Event Scale-Revised scores were significantly positively associated with Brief COPE Active coping scores and significantly negatively associated with MSPSS scores. Brief COPE Active coping and MSPSS scores were significantly positively associated with Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale scores, which were in turn significantly positively associated with Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey scores. Active coping in response to stressful situations is important for maintaining good mental health among emergency service workers. Active coping and social support may strengthen resilience, and resilience may improve QOL. Screening for mental health and QOL should include simultaneous assessment of stress-coping, social support, and resilience. Although the findings of this cross-sectional study are important, it could not confirm a causal relationship between PTSD and QOL.

Influence of Early Nutritional Nursing on Gastrointestinal Function and Stress Responses in Patients After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

This study investigated the influence of early nutritional nursing on gastrointestinal function and stress responses in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A total of 84 patients at Ankang Central Hospital from March 2019 to March 2020 were divided into the control group and treatment group using the numerical table method. The control group received routine nursing after laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and the treatment group received early nutritional nursing. The visual analogue scale and general comfort questionnaire scores of the treatment group were lower than those of the control group at 1, 3, and 5 days after surgery. The time to first feed, the time to first passage of gas, and the recovery time of intestinal sounds were significantly shorter in the treatment group compared to the control group. Abdominal distension and gastrointestinal reaction scores were significantly lower, while generic quality of life inventory-74 scores, Newcastle satisfaction with nursing scale scores, and Chinese version of the Conor–Davidson resilience scale scores were significantly higher in the treatment group compared to the control group. The levels of inflammatory factors and stress hormones were significantly lower in the treatment group than in the control group, while arm muscle circumference, body weight, and transferrin, hemoglobin, albumin, and prealbumin levels were significantly higher (P &lt; 0.05). Overall, early nutritional nursing can effectively relieve postoperative pain and improve gastrointestinal function, quality of life, nutritional status, and nursing satisfaction in patients after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Low Preoperative Brief Resilience Scale Scores Are Associated With Inferior Preoperative and Short-Term Postoperative Patient Outcomes Following Primary Autograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

To assess preoperative Brief Resilience Scale (BRS) scores as they relate to postoperative patient outcomes following primary autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). All patients who underwent primary autograft ACLR from 2016 to 2021 and had a patient-reported follow-up of 1 year and a clinical follow-up of 6 months were included in final data analysis. Patients completed validated PROMs pre- and postoperatively. All patients were objectively assessed with range of motion (ROM) and KT-1000 arthrometer testing. Return to sport (RTS) data were obtained for all applicable patients. Patients were divided into 3 groups based on ± ½ the standard deviation for the mean preoperative BRS score. In total, 170 patients who underwent primary autograft ACLR with a mean age of 20.1 years (range, 13-57 years) and a mean final follow-up time of 2.9 years (range, 1.0-5.8 years) were included in the final analysis. The mean preoperative BRS scores for the high-resilience (HR, n= 67), average-resilience (AR, n= 42), and low-resilience (LR, n= 61) groups were 28.1 (95% CI, 27.8-28.9), 24.5 (95% CI, 24.3-24.6), and 21.1 (95% CI, 20.5-21.7), respectively (P < .001). The HR group demonstrated significantly higher preoperative and postoperative patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) compared to the AR and LR groups, with more differences seen with the LR group. The HR group demonstrated better knee extension in postoperative month 3 compared to the LR group (0.6° [95% CI, -1.2° to 0.1°] vs -2.3° [95% CI, -3.3° to -1.3°], P= .006). The HR group demonstrated a faster RTS time compared to the LR group (6.4 months [95% CI, 6.1-6.7] vs 7.6 months [95% CI, 7.1-8.1], P= .002). No differences were seen in RTS rate, knee flexion, or KT-1000 arthrometer measurements between the 3 groups. Low preoperative BRS scores were associated with inferior PROMs preoperatively and in the short-term postoperative period compared to those with higher preoperative BRS scores. Additionally, patients with lower preoperative BRS scores demonstrated a higher degree of knee extension loss 3 months postoperatively as well as a slower RTS. Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Effect of empathy nursing combined with SBAR communication system on the negative emotions and nursing quality of children with tracheotomy.

Situation, Background, Assessment, and Recommendation (SBAR) is a structured method for communicating critical information that requires immediate attention and action. To study the effects of empathy nursing combined with the SBAR communication system on the negative emotions and nursing quality of children undergoing tracheotomy. This is a clinical observational study. A total of 100 tracheotomy patients who were cared for in the pediatric intensive care unit (subsequent treatment in the tracheotomy clinic or otolaryngology ward) of our hospital from September 2021 to June 2022 were recruited and assigned at a ratio of 1:1 either into a control group (empathic care) or an observation group (empathic care combined with SBAR) using a randomized method. Further, the postoperative anxiety self-rating scale scores, negative emotions, hope index, and nursing quality were compared between the two groups. After nursing, the psychological resilience scale score of the observation group was higher than that of the control group, whereas the anxiety self-rating scale score was significantly lower than that of the control group (all P< 0.05). Basic and special nursing, knowledge awareness, and safety management of the two groups of patients improved significantly, with higher results in the observation group than in the control group (P< 0.05). Empathy nursing combined with the SBAR communication system considerably improves postoperative negative emotions and enhances the quality of nursing care for patients undergoing tracheotomy.

Burnout, Resilience, and Mindfulness in Healthcare Workers in a Medically Underserved Region during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

To evaluate employee burnout, work conditions, resilience, and mindfulness at an academic medical center in a US medically underserved region during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. We surveyed employees from August 7, 2020 to January 17, 2021. Respondents completed the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI), the Areas of Worklife Survey, the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale, and the Philadelphia Mindfulness Scale (PHLMS) and answered a question about intention to stay in the present job until retirement. We performed exploratory stepwise logistic regression to evaluate associations between variables and intention to stay. We evaluated associations between variables with a structural equation model (SEM). The 655 respondents mostly were White women providers, aged 50 years and younger, who worked in inpatient wards, emergency departments, or intensive care units. Respondents had high mean MBI emotional exhaustion (35 ± 12) and moderate MBI depersonalization (12 ± 6), despite high MBI personal accomplishment (43 ± 8), middle-range Areas of Worklife Survey results, and middle to high Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale scores (29 ± 5), PHLMS awareness scores (37 ± 6), and PHLMS acceptance scores (30 ± 8). There were 408 respondents (62%) with MBI latent profiles consistent with being burned out, but 447 respondents (68%) were willing to stay in their present job. Older age was associated with intention to stay (coefficient 1.1 ± 0.1; P < 0.001). The latent variable burnout structural equation model (burnout-SEM) constructed from the MBI subscales inversely predicted intention to stay (coefficient - 0.33; P < 0.001), and this relationship was mediated by age. Burnout was prevalent despite substantial personal accomplishment, resilience, and mindfulness.

Increased patient resilience scores are related to positive postoperative outcomes in rotator cuff repairs

We sought to determine whether patients' preoperative resilience scores predict postoperative outcomes in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair surgery. Patients were prospectively enrolled and underwent data collection preoperatively and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. Data collected included demographic characteristics and the Brief Resilience Scale (BRS) score, visual analog scale score, Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey scores (mental component [VR-12M] and physical component [VR-12P]), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form score, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation score, and Simple Shoulder Test (SST) score. In total, 131 patients had complete 1- or 2-year postoperative outcome measures. Female patients comprised 56.5% of our sample, and the average age was 57.6 years. Between the low, normal, and high resilience groups, there were significant differences in the VR-12M scores at 0, 12, and 24 months postoperatively (P<.01 for all). The VR-12P scores at 12 months were 44.2, 47.4, and 49.8 in the low, normal, and high resilience groups, respectively, showing a trend upward, but this failed to reach the level of significance (P=.08). The SST scores of the low, normal, and high resilience groups at 12 months were 69.1, 79.9, and 85.1, respectively, again showing a trend upward, but this failed to reach the level of significance (P=.07). The SST scores at 0 and 24 months did not differ between groups. There were no significant differences in American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, visual analog scale, and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation scores at 0, 12, or 24 months postoperatively. We found a significant positive correlation between the BRS score and SST score at 12 months (R=0.18), VR-12M score at 12 months (R=0.38), VR-12M score at 24 months (R=0.31), and VR-12P score at 12 months (R=0.21). Our study provides evidence that BRS scores in patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair are related to postoperative outcomes, measured through the VR-12M and SST scores at 2-year follow-up.

Relationships between drinking habits, psychological resilience, and salivary cortisol responses on the Trier Social Stress Test-Online among Japanese people

BackgroundThis study aimed to determine whether individual differences in resilience interacted with those in alcohol consumption habits in situations involving exposure to psychosocial stressors (Trier Social Stress Test-Online; TSST-OL). Additionally, we investigated whether individuals exhibiting resilience in their psychological scale scores showed biological responses that could be interpreted as resilience in stressful situations, such as the TSST-OL. We hypothesized that there would be no association between drinking habits and stress responses in the high-resilience group. Furthermore, high drinking habits would be associated with high stress responses in the low-resilience group.MethodsWe recruited 22 and 20 individuals from the high and low-resilience groups, respectively, from among those who completed the online survey comprising the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) and resilience scales; we excluded individuals with AUDIT scores of 15 or higher, and divided them by the median total resilience scale score. During the TSST-OL, self-rated stress measurement and saliva sample collection were performed seven times. Frozen samples were collected at the Tokyo site, and salivary hormonal (cortisol and dehydroepiandrosterone) levels were measured after transport in frozen state. Finally, 36 participants were included in the analysis of self-rated stress and cortisol levels.ResultsWe observed the typical subjective stress responses to the TSST-OL. People with higher psychological scale scores for resilience traits showed significantly higher salivary cortisol levels than those with lower scores. Due to deficiencies in the survey and experimental design, the classification criteria were changed and an exploratory analysis was performed to investigate the interaction of individual differences in resilience and drinking habits. In contrast to our expectation, those with low resilience scores showed stress responses, regardless of their drinking habits. Furthermore, those with high resilience and drinking habits showed a specific insensitivity to salivary cortisol levels. Their self-rated stress scores were similar to those of other groups.ConclusionsOur study showed the applicability of the TSST-OL in the Japanese population, the individual relationship between psychological resilience measures and biological stress responses, and a specific insensitivity in the salivary cortisol response as a result of individual differences in high resilience and drinking habits.

A prospective assessment of resilience in trauma patients using the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale

BackgroundResilience, or the ability to adapt to difficult or challenging life experiences, may be an important mediator in trauma recovery. The primary aim of this study was to describe resilience levels for trauma patients using the validated Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale. MethodsAdult trauma patients admitted to a Level 1 trauma center (June 2022–August 2022) were surveyed at the time of admission and by phone between 2 weeks and 1 month after the original survey to obtain follow-up scores. We utilized the validated Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale score, a 25-question survey with 5 subfactors (Tenacity, Positive Outlook, Social Support, Problem Solving, and Meaning and Purpose). Each question was scored from 0 to 4 (maximum score 100, representing the highest resilience). Patient factors were collected from the electronic medical record and trauma health registry. Wilcoxon signed-rank test and multivariable linear regression were used to understand associations with Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale scores. ResultsWe enrolled 98 patients. The median age was 50 years (interquartile range 32–67), and 74% were male sex. The baseline median Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale score on admission was 88 (interquartile range 81–94). Follow-up surveys (N = 64) showed a median score of 89.5 (80–90.5) (P = non-significant). No demographic variable was significantly associated with increasing baseline Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale score. Increased length of stay (β = 1.03), insurance (β = −7.50), and unknown race (β = 23.69) were correlated with follow-up Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale scores. The subfactor “Meaning and Purpose” decreased at follow-up but was not statistically significant (P = .05). ConclusionValidated tools that can accurately distinguish variability in resilience scores are needed for the trauma patient population to understand its relationship with long-term patient health outcomes.

Evaluation of Nurses' Vaccine Hesitancy, Psychological Resilience, and Anxiety Levels During COVID-19 Pandemic.

This study aimed to evaluate the vaccine hesitancy, psychological resilience, and anxiety levels of nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic. This cross-sectional study was conducted with 676 nurses working at the survey time. Sociodemographic features, the status of hesitancy against the COVID-19 vaccine, the Coronavirus Anxiety Scale, and the Brief Resilience Scale were used in the questionnaire form to collect the data. Most participants (68.6%; n=464) stated they were hesitant about the COVID-19 vaccine. A sig- nificantly higher rate of hesitancy was detected in the age group of 20-39 years, those who did not have COVID-19 vaccine, and those who did not think the COVID-19 vaccine is protective (P < .05). It was determined that 6.8% (n=46) of the nurses had COVID-19 anxiety. A significantly higher rate of anxiety was detected in the age group of 40 years and older, those working in the emergency department, and those working in the COVID-19 unit during the pandemic period (P < .05). The median Brief Resilience Scale score of nurses is 19(6). A negative, weak, and significant relationship was found between the Brief Resilience Scale and Coronavirus Anxiety Scale scores (P = .001). During the pandemic, higher rates of anxiety were detected in healthcare personnel and those working in COVID-19 units. It was also found that as the level of anxiety increased, the level of psychological resilience decreased. To reduce the anxiety level and strengthen the psychological resilience of nurses, the cornerstones of the health system, fast, effective, and curative interventions should be made.

Social support and self-efficacy multiply mediate the relationship between medical coping style and resilience in patients with type A aortic dissection.

Previous research has shown that medical coping modes are associated with resilience in cardiovascular disease patients. However, postoperatively, the mechanism underlying this association in Stanford type A aortic dissection patients is poorly understood. This study investigated the mediating effects of social support and self-efficacy on the relationship between medical coping modes and resilience in Stanford type A aortic dissection patients postoperatively. We assessed 125 patients after surgery for Stanford type A aortic dissection using the Medical Coping Modes Questionnaire, the General Self-Efficacy Scale, the Social Support Rating Scale, and the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale. Structural equation modeling with AMOS (v.24) was used to test the hypothesized model with multiple mediators. Both direct and mediational effects (through social support and self-efficacy) of medical coping modes on resilience outcomes were examined. The mean Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale score was 63.78 ± 12.29. Confrontation, social support, and self-efficacy correlated with resilience (r = 0.40, 0.23, 0.72, respectively; all p < 0.01). In multiple mediation models, social support independently (effect = 0.11; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.04-0.27) and social support and self-efficacy serially (effect = 0.06; 95% CI, 0.02-0.14) mediated the association of confrontation with resilience maintenance, accounting for 57.89 and 10.53% of the total effect, respectively. Social support and self-efficacy were multiple mediators of the relationship between confrontation and resilience. Interventions designed to facilitate confrontation and subsequently increase social support and self-efficacy may be useful to increase resilience in Stanford type A aortic dissection patients.

Reliability and Validity of the Korean Version of the Brief Resilience Scale.

: To translate the Brief Resilience Scale into Korean and evaluate its reliability and validity. : To investigate the factor structure of the Brief Resilience Scale, we examined a two-factor model comprising positively and negatively worded items. Congruent and divergent validity of the Brief Resilience Scale were investigated using correlation analysis between the Brief Resilience Scale and resilience, depression, and perceived stress. By conducting an analysis of variance among groups classified by suicidality (no suicidality, only suicidal ideation, and suicidal ideation or suicidal plan groups), we evaluated how well the Brief Resilience Scale could detect people with a high risk of suicide. : Confirmatory factor analysis results supported the construct validity of the Brief Resilience Scale using a two-factor model. Cronbach's alpha (0.91) and McDonald's omega (0.91) scores indicated high internal consistency. Correlation analysis showed that the Brief Resilience Scale scores were strongly associated with a questionnaire evaluating resilience, depression, and perceived stress. Analysis of variance and post-hoc tests showed that he Brief Resilience Scale scores were highest in the no suicidality group (p ＜ 0.001). : The Korean version of the Brief Resilience Scale is a valid and reliable instrument for evaluating resilience as the capacity to recover from adversity and endure obstacles or stress. This study also provides important evidence regarding the sensitivity of the Brief Resilience Scale to suicidal risk.

Patients With Low Resilience Scores Have Significantly Worse Postoperative Outcomes After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Than Patients With Normal or High Resilience Scores

To evaluate the relationship between patient resilience and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS) after primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Patients who underwent an ACL reconstruction by a single surgeon between January 2012 and June 2020 were identified by an institutional query using Current Procedural Terminology codes. Patients were included if they (1) underwent a primary ACL reconstruction and (2) had a minimum of 2 years' follow-up. Data were retrospectively collected regarding demographics, surgical details, visual analog scale (VAS) scores, and 12-item short form survey (SF-12) scores. Resilience scores were obtained via the Brief Resilience Scale questionnaire. Stratification into low (LR), normal (NR), and high resilience (HR) was based on standard deviation from mean Brief Resilience Scale score to determine differences in PROMS between groups. One-hundred eighty-seven patients were identified by the institutional query. Of the 187 patients, 180 met inclusion criteria. Seven patients underwent revision ACL reconstruction and were excluded from the study. One-hundred three patients (57.2%) completed the postoperative questionnaire and were included. Patients in the NR group and HR group had significantly greater postoperative SF-12 scores (P < .001) and lower postoperative VAS pain scores (P < .001) when compared with those of the LR group. This trend was again shown with breakdown of the SF-12 into physical and mental aspects, each of which were significantly greater in either the NR group or HR group when compared with the LR group (P < .001). Overall, 97.9% and 99.0% of patients had changes in their SF-12 total and VAS pain scores respectively that exceeded the minimal clinically important difference for the cohort. Patients with lower resilience scores have worse PROMs and increased pain than patients with greater resilience at a minimum of 2-year follow-up after ACL reconstruction. Level IV, prognostic case series.