This paper responds to the emerging concerns of residential dissonance character by examining the position and influence of the “life-course” framework of households on residential mobility decisions and the conjunct attainment of subjective well-being in their current and anticipated residential locations. Using data from a cross-sectional survey design and adopting a multi-stage sampling procedure, a comparative study of 397 households from immigrant communities within the Kumasi metropolis is conceptualized. Results from the study revealed contrasting variabilities in the push and pull factors influencing households' relocation experiences and decisions to move. Also, the likelihood of households relocating over the life course was significantly anchored on the employment stage. Thus, decision-making proxies for households' relocation intentions, preparedness, and realizing actual moves were noticeably rapid decisions during active employment life. The study further found that the associated perception of attaining subjective well-being attached to a household's anticipated residential locations was significantly higher than that of their current residence. On the premise of these empirical contributions, the paper outlines how findings could ultimately inform the development of sustainable urban growth management and shape housing mobility planning policies for rapidly growing regions within the global south.
Read full abstract