Resident Operative Autonomy Research Articles

Behind the pattern: General surgery resident autonomy in robotic surgery

ObjectiveRobotic surgery is increasingly utilized and common in general surgery training programs. This study sought to better understand the factors that influence resident operative autonomy in robotic surgery. We hypothesized that resident seniority, surgeon work experience, surgeon robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) case volume, and procedure type influence general surgery residents’ opportunities for autonomy in RAS as measured by percentage of resident individual console time (ICT). MethodsGeneral surgery resident ICT data for robotic cholecystectomy (RC), inguinal hernia (RIH), and ventral hernia (RVH) operations performed on the dual-console Da Vinci surgical robotic system between July 2019 and June 2021 were extracted. Cases with postgraduate year (PGY) 2–5 residents participating as a console surgeon were included. A sequential explanatory mixed-methods approach was undertaken to explore the ICT results and we conducted secondary qualitative interviews with surgeons. Descriptive statistics and thematic analysis were applied. ResultsResident ICT data from 420 robotic cases (IH 200, RC 121, and VH 99) performed by 20 junior residents (PGY2-3), 18 senior residents (PGY4-5), and 9 attending surgeons were extracted. The average ICT per case was 26.8 % for junior residents and 42.4 % for senior residents. Compared to early-career surgeons, surgeons with over 10 years' work experience gave less ICT to junior (18.2 % vs. 32.0 %) and senior residents (33.9 % vs. 56.6 %) respectively. Surgeons' RAS case volume had no correlation with resident ICT (r = 0.003, p = 0.0003). On average, residents had the most ICT in RC (45.8 %), followed by RIH (36.7 %) and RVH (28.6 %). Interviews with surgeons revealed two potential reasons for these resident ICT patterns: 1) Surgeon assessment of resident training year/experience influenced decisions to grant ICT; 2) Surgeons’ perceived operative time pressure inversely affected resident ICT. ConclusionsThis study suggests resident ICT/autonomy in RC, RIH, and RVH are influenced by resident seniority level, surgeon work experience, and procedure type, but not related to surgeon RAS case volume. Design and implementation of an effective robotic training program must consider the external pressures at conflict with increased resident operative autonomy and seek to mitigate them.

Did Residents Stop Operating During COVID? Impact of COVID-19 Across VA Teaching Hospitals on Surgical Resident Education.

During the COVID-19 pandemic, elective cases across the nation were suspended, leading to major decreases in operative volume for surgical trainees. Surgical resident operative autonomy has been declining over time, so we sought to explore the effect COVID-19 had on resident autonomy within VA teaching hospitals. A retrospective analysis of surgical cases across specialties was performed using the VA Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from September 2019 to September 2021 at VA teaching hospitals. Supervision codes are recorded prospectively: attending surgeon performs the operation (AP), resident completes majority of the case with the attending scrubbed (AR), and resident is primary surgeon without attending scrubbed (RP). 20,457 cases pre-COVID decreased to 11,035 during peak-COVID (P < .001). Overall, RP cases increased from 6.5% to 7.6% during the peak (P < .001) and trended back downwards during the recovery periods. AP decreased initially (29.9%-27.7%, P < .001), but regressed back to pre-pandemic numbers. In general surgery RP cases, urgent cases such as laparoscopic cholecystectomies increased from 18.8% to 27.5%, while elective repairs decreased during the peak. Similar changes were noted across specialties. Operative cases dropped by half from pre- to peak- COVID and remained 20% below pre-pandemic volume the following year. Interestingly, RP rates increased for several specialties during the peak of the pandemic, which may have resulted from a relative higher ratio of resident personnel:case volume and shift in case distribution from elective to urgent. The increase in RP rate has begun to regress to pre-COVID levels which need to be readdressed.

Why Not This Case? Differences Between Resident and Attending Operative Cases at Teaching Hospitals

IntroductionPrevious studies have focused on outcomes pertaining to resident operative autonomy, but there has been little academic work examining the types of patients and cases where autonomy is afforded. We sought to describe the differences between surgical patient populations in teaching cases where residents are and are not afforded autonomy. MethodsWe examined all general and vascular operations at Veterans Affairs teaching hospitals from 2004 to 2019 using Veterans Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Level of resident supervision is prospectively recorded by the operating room nurse at the time of surgery: attending primary (AP): the attending performs the case with or without a resident; attending resident (AR): the resident performs the case with the attending scrubbed; resident primary (RP): resident operating with supervising attending not scrubbed. Resident (R) cases refer to AR + RP. Patient demographics, comorbidities, level of supervision, and top cases within each group were evaluated. ResultsA total of 618,578 cases were analyzed; 154,217 (24.9%) were AP, 425,933 (68.9%) AR, and 38,428 (6.2%) RP. Using work relative value unit as a surrogate for complexity, RP was the least complex compared to AP and AR (10.4/14.4/14.8, P < 0.001). RP also had a lower proportion of American Society of Anesthesiologists 3 and 4 + 5 patients (P < 0.001), were younger (P < 0.001), and generally had lower comorbidities. The most common RP cases made up a higher proportion of all RP cases than they did for AP/AR and demonstrated several core competencies (hernia, cholecystectomy, appendectomy, amputation). R cases, however, were generally sicker than AP cases. ConclusionsIn the small proportion of cases where residents were afforded autonomy, we found they were more focused on the core general surgery cases on lower risk patients. This selection bias likely demonstrates appropriate attending judgment in affording autonomy. However, this cohort consisted of many “sicker” patients and those factors alone should not disqualify resident involvement.

Autonomy Maps: Building a Shared Mental Model for Progressive Resident Operative Autonomy on the Road to Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs)

Our residents expressed dissatisfaction with operative autonomy and faculty feedback regarding technical skills. They reported variability among faculty regarding allowed operative autonomy. Our goals were to establish a shared mental model among residents and faculty regarding intraoperative performance expectations. We asked faculty to assign a level of expected autonomy (Zwisch scale) for various steps of common procedures according to the resident post-graduate year. Through an iterative process, the maps were standardized across service lines. The resulting "Autonomy Maps" were distributed to the faculty and residents. We held educational sessions and set expectations for use. Selected benchmarks were incorporated into resident end-of-rotation assessment forms. Initial operative case mapping identified variability in faculty expectations for a given post-graduate year and procedure. Residents reported improved satisfaction with understanding expectations regarding operative performance. Establishing autonomy benchmarks facilitated more specific feedback regarding residents' technical skills. Faculty expectations for resident operative autonomy are variable. Autonomy Maps provide structure for a shared mental model between faculty and residents for progressive operative autonomy and serve as a framework for expectations that improve resident satisfaction. Case-specific technical benchmarks are useful tools for assessing residents' technical milestones.

Is Robotic Console Time a Surrogate for Resident Operative Autonomy?

Robotic-assisted surgery is an increasing part of general surgery training, but resident autonomy on the robotic platform can be hard to quantify. Robotic console time (RCT), the percentage of time the resident controls the console, may be an appropriate measure of resident operative autonomy. This study aims to characterize the correlation between objective resident RCT and subjectively scored operative autonomy. Using a validated resident performance evaluation instrument, we collected resident operative autonomy ratings from residents and attendings performing robotic cholecystectomy (RC) and robotic inguinal hernia repair (IH) at a university-based general surgery program between 9/2020-6/2021. We then extracted RCT data from the Intuitive surgical system. Descriptive statistics, t-tests and ANOVA were performed. A total of 31 robotic operations (13 RC, 18 IH) performed by 4 attending surgeons and 8 residents (4 junior, 4 senior) were matched and included. 83.9% of cases were scored by both attending and resident. The average RCT per case was 35.6%(95% CI 13.0%,58.3%) for junior residents (PGY 2-3) and 59.7%(CI 51.1%,68.3%) for senior residents (PGY 4-5). The mean autonomy evaluated by residents was 3.29(CI 2.85,3.73) out of a maximum score of 5, while the mean autonomy evaluated by attendings was 4.12(CI 3.68,4.55). RCT significantly correlated with subjective evaluations of resident autonomy (r=0.61, p=0.0003). RCT also moderately correlated with resident training level (r=0.5306, p<0.0001). Neither attending robotic experience nor operation type significantly correlated with RCT or autonomy evaluation scores. Our study suggests that resident console time is a valid surrogate for resident operative autonomy in robotic cholecystectomy and inguinal hernia repair. RCT may be a valuable measure in objective assessment of residents' operative autonomy and training efficiency. Future investigation into how RCT correlates with subjective and objective autonomy metrics such as verbal guidance or distinguishing critical operative steps is needed to validate the study findings further.

Preparing for and passing the fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery (FLS) exam improves general surgery resident operative performance and autonomy.

The American Board of Surgery made the Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) exam a prerequisite for board certification in 2009. Some residency programs have questioned the need for a continued FLS testing mandate given limited evidence that supports the impact of FLS on intraoperative skills. The Society for Improving Medical Professional Learning (SIMPL) app is a tool to evaluate resident intraoperative performance. We hypothesized that general surgery resident operative performance would improve immediately after preparing for the FLS exam. The national public FLS data registry was matched with SIMPL resident evaluations from 2015 to 2021 and de-identified. SIMPL evaluations are scored in three categories: supervision required (Zwisch scale 1-4, 1 = show and tell and 4 = supervision only), performance (scale 1-5, 1 = exceptional and 5 = unprepared), and case complexity (scale 1-3, 1 = easiest and 3 = hardest). Statistical analyses compared pre and post-FLS exam resident average operative evaluation scores. There were a total of 76 general surgery residents, and 573 resident SIMPL evaluations included in this study. Residents required more supervision in laparoscopic cases performed before compared to after the FLS exam (2.84 vs. 3.03, respectively, p = 0.007). Residents performance scores improved from cases before compared to after the FLS exam (2.70 vs. 2.43, respectively, p = 0.001). Case complexity did not differ before versus after the FLS exam (2.13 vs. 2.18, respectively, p = 0.202). PGY level significantly predicted evaluation scores with a moderate correlation. A sub analysis grouped by PGY level revealed a significant improvement after the FLS exam in supervision among PGY-2 residents (2.33 vs. 2.58, respectively, p = 0.04) and performance among PGY-4 residents (2.67 vs 2.04, respectively, p < 0.001). Preparation for, and passing, the FLS exam improves resident intraoperative laparoscopic performance and independence. We recommend taking the exam in the first two years of residency to enhance the laparoscopic experience for the remainder of training.

Declining Surgical Resident Operative Autonomy—All Trainees Are Not Created Equal

IntroductionWe have previously shown that resident autonomy has decreased over time overall for all surgery residents. The purpose of this study is to examine changes in operative autonomy in general surgery residency within each postgraduate year (PGY) level. Materials and methodsThis is a retrospective analysis of the Veterans Association Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from July 1, 2004 to September 30, 2019. All general surgery, vascular surgery, and thoracic surgery procedures were analyzed and categorized by level of resident supervision as attending primary, attending operating with resident, or resident primary without attending scrubbed. Procedure work portion of relative value unit was used to capture procedure complexity. Changes in resident autonomy over time, procedure complexity, and outcomes were compared among PGY levels 1 to 5. ResultsA total of 385,482 cases were analyzed. At each PGY level from 2014 to 2018, the relative decrease in resident primary cases ranged from −37.3% (PGY 4) to −75.5% (PGY 3). Mean work portion of relative value unit saw steady increase with PGY level (8.4 ± 3.5 in PGY 1 to 10.8 ± 5.7 in PGY 5, P < 0.001) and did not show a trend over time. ConclusionsSurgical resident operative autonomy has markedly decreased over time across all PGY levels. This effect is most profound at the PGY 3 level, while more senior residents are affected to a lesser degree. Case complexity show PGY level-appropriate increase in resident autonomous cases. Decrease in resident autonomy over time is not associated with changes in case complexity.

A simulation curriculum for laparoscopic common bile duct exploration, balloon sphincterotomy, and endobiliary stenting: Associations with resident performance and autonomy in the operating room.

Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration is safe and effective for managing choledocholithiasis, but laparoscopic common bile duct exploration is rarely performed, which threatens surgical trainee proficiency. This study tests the hypothesis that prior operative or simulation experience with laparoscopic common bile duct exploration is associated with greater resident operative performance and autonomy without adversely affecting patient outcomes. This longitudinal cohort study included 33 consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic common bile duct exploration in cases involving postgraduate years 3, 4, and 5 general surgery residents at a single institution during the implementation of a laparoscopic common bile duct exploration simulation curriculum. For each of the 33 cases, resident performance and autonomy were rated by residents and attendings, the resident's prior operative and simulation experience were recorded, and patient outcomes were ascertained from electronic health records for comparison among 3 cohorts: prior operative experience, prior simulation experience, and no prior experience. Operative approach was similar among cohorts. Overall morbidity was 6.1% and similar across cohorts. The operative performance scores were higher in prior experience cohorts according to both residents (3.0 [2.8-3.0] vs 2.0 [2.0-3.0]; P= .01) and attendings (3.0 [3.0-4.0]; P < .001). The autonomy scores were higher in prior experience cohorts according to both residents (2.0 [2.0-3.0] vs 2.0 [2.0-2.0]; P= .005) and attendings (2.5 [2.0-3.0] vs 2.0 [1.0-2.0]; P= .001). Prior simulation and prior operative experience had similar associations with performance and autonomy. Simulation experience with laparoscopic common bile duct exploration was associated with greater resident operative performance and autonomy, with effects that mimic prior operative experience. This illustrates the potential for simulation-based training to improve resident operative performance and autonomy for laparoscopic common bile duct exploration.

Does anesthesia type affect surgical resident operative autonomy for open inguinal hernia repairs?

Does anesthesia type affect surgical resident operative autonomy for open inguinal hernia repairs?

Resident Operative Autonomy and Attending Verbal Feedback Differ by Resident and Attending Gender.

This study tests the null hypotheses that overall sentiment and gendered words in verbal feedback and resident operative autonomy relative to performance are similar for female and male residents. Female and male surgical residents may experience training differently, affecting the quality of learning and graduated autonomy. A longitudinal, observational study using a Society for Improving Medical Professional Learning collaborative dataset describing resident and attending evaluations of resident operative performance and autonomy and recordings of verbal feedback from attendings from surgical procedures performed at 54 US general surgery residency training programs from 2016 to 2021. Overall sentiment, adjectives, and gendered words in verbal feedback were quantified by natural language processing. Resident operative autonomy and performance, as evaluated by attendings, were reported on 5-point ordinal scales. Performance-adjusted autonomy was calculated as autonomy minus performance. The final dataset included objective assessments and dictated feedback for 2683 surgical procedures. Sentiment scores were higher for female residents (95 [interquartile range (IQR), 4-100] vs 86 [IQR 2-100]; P < 0.001). Gendered words were present in a greater proportion of dictations for female residents (29% vs 25%; P = 0.04) due to male attendings disproportionately using male-associated words in feedback for female residents (28% vs 23%; P = 0.01). Overall, attendings reported that male residents received greater performance-adjusted autonomy compared with female residents (P < 0.001). Sentiment and gendered words in verbal feedback and performance-adjusted operative autonomy differed for female and male general surgery residents. These findings suggest a need to ensure that trainees are given appropriate and equitable operative autonomy and feedback.

Surgical resident experience with common bile duct exploration and assessment of performance and autonomy with formative feedback

BackgroundCommon bile duct exploration (CBDE) is safe and effective for managing choledocholithiasis, but most US general surgeons have limited experience with CBDE and are uncomfortable performing this procedure in practice. Surgical trainee exposure to CBDE is limited, and their learning curve for achieving autonomous, practice-ready performance has not been previously described. This study tests the hypothesis that receipt of one or more prior CBDE operative performance assessments, combined with formative feedback, is associated with greater resident operative performance and autonomy.MethodsResident and attending assessments of resident operative performance and autonomy were obtained for 189 laparoscopic or open CBDEs performed at 28 institutions. Performance and autonomy were graded along validated ordinal scales. Cases in which the resident had one or more prior CBDE case evaluations (n = 48) were compared with cases in which the resident had no prior evaluations (n = 141).ResultsCompared with cases in which the resident had no prior CBDE case evaluations, cases with a prior evaluation had greater proportions of practice-ready or exceptional performance ratings according to both residents (27% vs. 11%, p = .009) and attendings (58% vs. 19%, p < .001) and had greater proportions of passive help or supervision only autonomy ratings according to both residents (17% vs. 4%, p = .009) and attendings (69% vs. 32%, p < .01).ConclusionsResidents with at least one prior CBDE evaluation and formative feedback demonstrated better operative performance and received greater autonomy than residents without prior evaluations, underscoring the propensity of feedback to help residents achieve autonomous, practice-ready performance for rare operations.

Surgical resident operative autonomy on nights and weekends: What happens to surgical education during off-hours?

Surgical resident operative autonomy is critical for trainee maturation to independence. Acute care surgery (ACS) cases commonly occur off-hours and tension between operating room availability and on-call staff can affect resident operative autonomy. We examined operative resident autonomy for general, vascular, and thoracic (GVT) surgery during nights and weekends. We hypothesized that residents would be afforded less operative autonomy during off - hours than weekdays. This retrospective cohort study uses the Veterans Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement Program database, we examined all GVT cases at Veterans Affairs teaching hospitals from 2004 to 2019. All cases are coded for the level of supervision at the time of surgery: AP, attending primary surgeon; AR, attending and resident operating together; and RP, resident primary (attending supervising but not scrubbed). Cases starting between 6 pm to 7 am Monday through Friday were considered nights, cases on Saturday/Sunday were considered weekends, and collectively considered "off-hours." Resident primary case rates were compared by start time and type. Over the 15-year study period, there were 666,421 GVT cases performed with 38,097 cases (6%) performed off-hours. During off-hours, 31,396 (83%) were ACS compared with 5% of daytime cases. Overall, off-hours cases have higher RP rate than daytime cases (6.8% vs. 5.8%, p < 0.001). Daytime ACS cases have higher rates of RP than nights/weekends (7.6% vs. 6.8%, p < 0.001). Conversely, daytime elective cases have lower RP than nights (5.7% vs. 7.9%, p < 0.001). During off-hours, there are more RP cases on nights compared with weekends (7.1% vs. 6.5%, p = 0.02). Overall, residents were afforded more operative autonomy during off-hours, with nights having greater RP than weekends. In contrast, ACS cases have more autonomy during weekdays. These data have potentially significant implications for ACS service staffing, night float rotations, and overall resident operative experience on ACS services. Prognostic and Epidemiological; Level III.

Variation in Resident Operative Autonomy at Veterans Affairs Hospitals

This cohort study examines resident involvement in the care of US veterans who underwent noncardiac surgery.

Declining Resident Surgical Autonomy and Improving Surgical Outcomes: Correlation Does Not Equal Causality

The volume of cases that residents perform independentlyhave decreased leaving graduating chief residents less prepared for independent practice. Outcomes are not worse when residents are given autonomy with appropriate supervision, however it is unknown if outcomes are worsening with decreasing operative autonomy experience. We hypothesize that resident autonomous cases parallel the improving outcomes in surgical care over time, however, are less complex and on lower acuity patients. Retrospective study utilizing the Veterans Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement Program (VASQIP) database. Operative cases performed on teaching services within the VASQIP database from July 1, 2004 to September 30, 2019, were included. All adult patients who underwent a surgical procedure from July 1, 2004, to September 30, 2019, at a VA hospital on a service that included residents were initially included. After inclusions and exclusions, there were 1,346,461 cases. Cases were divided into 3 sequential 5 year eras (ERA 1: 2004-2008 n = 415,614, ERA 2: 2009-2013 n = 478,528, and ERA 3: 2014-2019 n = 452,319). The main exposure of interest was level of resident supervision, coded at the time of procedure as: attending primary surgeon (AP); attending and resident (AR), or resident primary with the attending supervising but not scrubbed (RP). We compared 30 day all-cause mortality, composite morbidity, work relative value unit (wRVU), hospital length of stay, and operative time between each ERA for RP cases, as well as within each ERA for RP cases compared to AR and AP cases. There was a progressive decline in the rate of RP cases in each successive ERA (ERA 1: 58,249 (14.0%) vs ERA 2: 47,891 (10.0%) vs ERA 3: 35,352 (7.8%), p < 0.001). For RP cases, patients were progressively getting older (60 yrs [53-71] vs 63 yrs [54-69] vs 66 yrs [57-72], p < 0.001) and sicker (ASA 3 58.7% vs 62.5% vs 66.2% and ASA 4/5 8.4% vs 9.6% vs10.0%, p < 0.001). Odds of mortality decreased in each ERA compared to the previous (aOR 0.71 [0.62-0.80] ERA 2 vs ERA 1 and 0.82 [0.70-0.97] ERA 3 vs ERA 2) as did morbidity (0.77 [0.73-0.82] ERA 2 vs ERA 1 and 0.72 [0.68-0.77] ERA 3 vs ERA 2). Operative and length of stay also decreased while wRVU stayed unchanged. When comparing RP cases to AP and AR within each ERA, RP cases tended to be on younger and healthier patients with a lower wRVU, particularly compared to AR cases. Mortality and morbidity were no different or better in RP compared to AR and AP. Despite resident autonomy decreasing, outcomes in cases where they are afforded autonomy are improving over time. This despite RP cases being on sicker and older patients and performing roughly the same complexity of cases. They also continue to perform no worse than cases with higher levels of supervision. Efforts to increase surgical resident operative autonomy are still needed to improve readiness for independent practice.

In Sickness and in Health: An Analysis of Surgical Resident Operative Autonomy Outcomes Based on American Society of Anesthesiologists Classification

INTRODUCTION: Resident operative autonomy has progressively decreased and one of the common causes cited is patient safety. The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score is based on the patient comorbidities and has strong predictive power for morbidity and mortality. The goal of this study was to compare the surgical outcomes by ASA class in relation to resident operative autonomy. METHODS: Using the VA Surgical Quality Improvement Program database, we examined all operative cases of all surgical specialties at teaching VA hospitals from 2004 to 2019. Level of resident operative supervision is prospectively recorded: attending primary surgeon with or without a resident assistant (AP), resident surgeon with attending scrubbed (AR), and resident primary without attending scrubbed (RP). Within each ASA class, the rates of autonomy, composite morbidity, and 30-day mortality were compared. RESULTS: Of 1,344,871 total cases, 141,214 (10.5%) were RP. RP rates decreased with increasing ASA: ASA 1 13%, ASA 2 11.5%, ASA 3 10.3%, ASA 2 10.3%, and ASA 4/5 9.0% (p < 0.001). Overall mortality and morbidity increased with increasing ASA. For each ASA class, there was either no difference or lower morbidity and mortality rates in RP compared to AP and/or AR (Figure).CONCLUSION: Residents are afforded less resident operative autonomy in patients with increasing perioperative risk, which demonstrates appropriate judgement of teaching attendings. Resident autonomous cases did not have worse outcomes regardless of ASA class. In appropriately selected patients, allowing resident operative autonomy is safe even in patients with significant comorbidities.

Resident Operative Autonomy and Attending Verbal Feedback Differ by Resident and Attending Gender

Resident Operative Autonomy and Attending Verbal Feedback Differ by Resident and Attending Gender

Resident Operative Autonomy: The Art of Giving and Taking

Resident Operative Autonomy: The Art of Giving and Taking

General Surgery Resident Complement and Operative Autonomy – Size Matters

Operative autonomy has progressively decreased for surgery residents. This study investigates the effect of general surgery resident complement size at Veterans Affairs (VA) hospitals on operative autonomy for the residents. We hypothesize that smaller complements of residents would result in fewer opportunities for operative autonomy. Retrospective analysis of the Veterans Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement Program (VASQIP) database. Operative cases within the VASQIP database from July 1, 2004 to September 30, 2019 were analyzed. All general surgery procedures performed at teaching VA hospitals from January 2004 to September 2019 were included. The level of resident operative autonomy is defined as follows: attending primary surgeon with or without a resident (AP), resident primary surgeon with attending scrubbed (AR), and resident primary without attending scrubbed (RP). Resident complement is based on funded resident positions at each VA hospital during the academic year 2017-2018 and stratified into 3 groups: small (≤4), medium (>4-<7), and large (≥7). The primary outcome was the proportion of operative autonomy for each resident complement group. Secondary outcomes were level of autonomy over time, and mortality and morbidity for RP procedures. Categorical data were compared with Chi-squared test. Four hundred sixty-one thousand seven hundred thirty-four procedures across 92 VA hospitals with general surgery residents were included in the analysis. There were 126,062 cases performed at 29 small resident complement hospitals, 135,539 at 28 medium resident complement hospitals, and 200,133 at 35 large resident complement hospitals. The percentage of RP procedures was higher with increasing resident complement (2.1% vs 6.8% vs 9.9%, p < 0.001). RP procedures have decreased over time in all groups, but the relative decrease was less pronounced as resident complement increased (79.5% vs 73.3% vs 64.7%, p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in adjusted 30-day all-cause mortality between groups. Increased resident complement at VA hospitals is associated with increased resident autonomy in resident primary procedures. Resident autonomy has decreased over time regardless of complement size, but it is less dramatic at sites with more residents. Increasing resident complement at a site may improve operative autonomy, leading to an improved educational experience for surgical residents.

Declining Surgical Resident Operative Autonomy in Acute Care Surgical Cases

IntroductionSurgical resident operative autonomy has decreased markedly over time, reducing resident readiness for independent practice. We sought to examine operative resident autonomy for emergency acute care surgery (ACS) compared to elective cases and associated patient outcomes at veterans affairs hospitals. MethodsThe Veterans Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried for ACS cases (emergency general, vascular, and thoracic) at veterans affairs hospitals from 2004 to 2019. Cases are coded prospectively for the level of supervision: attending primary surgeon (AP); attending scrubbed with resident surgeon (AR); resident primary (RP), attending not scrubbed. Baseline demographics, operative variables, and outcomes were compared. ResultsA total of 61,275 ACS cases and 605,146 elective cases were performed during the study period. The ACS had a higher proportion of RP cases (7.2% versus 5.7%, P < 0.001). The proportion of ACS RP cases decreased from 9.9% to 4.1% (58.6%); elective RP cases decreased from 8.9% to 2.9% (67.4%). The most common ACS RP surgeries were appendectomy, amputations, and cholecystectomy. RP cases had lower American Society of Anesthesia class and lower median work relative value units than AP and AR. There was no difference between mortality rates of RP compared to AP (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.94 [0.80-1.09] or AR 0.94 [0.81-1.08]). While there was no difference in complications between the RP and AP (OR 1.01 [0.92-1.12]), there were significantly more complications in AR compared to RP (OR 1.20 [1.10-1.31]). ConclusionsMore autonomy is granted for ACS cases compared to elective cases. While both decreased over time, the decrease is less for ACS cases. Resident autonomy does not negatively impact outcomes, even in emergent cases.

Patient inequities in affording surgical resident operative autonomy at Veterans Affairs teaching hospitals, does it extend to female patients?

BackgroundExamining surgical resident operative autonomy within the Veterans Affairs (VA) System, we previously showed residents were afforded autonomy more frequently on Black patients. We hypothesized that, compared to males, female surgical patients receive less attending involvement and more resident autonomy during surgery. MethodsRetrospective review of all general/vascular surgeries performed at teaching VA hospitals from 2004 to 2019. Operative procedures are coded at the time of surgery as attending primary surgeon (AP), attending with resident (AR), or resident primary surgeon--attending not scrubbed (RP). The primary outcome was the difference in supervision rates between patient sexes. Results618,578 operations were examined—24.9% AP, 68.9% AR, and 6.2% RP. Overall, 5.9% of cases were performed on women. The rate of RP cases was higher in males compared to females (6.3% vs 5.3%, p < 0.001). ConclusionFemale veterans are less likely to have residents operate on them autonomously. Reasons for this require further characterization.