Resident Communication Skills Research Articles

Communication skills of residents: are they as good as they think?

ABSTRACT Purpose To evaluate the current communication skills of resident physicians and identify areas for improvement. Study design Using a cross-sectional design, data from medical students, residents, fellows, and faculty were assimilated at one of the largest academic medical centers in a low-and-middle-income country via a self-administered, validated survey with a 5-point LIKERT scale. One-way ANOVA was used to compare intra-group means, followed by the Bonferroni test, with a p-value <0.05 considered significant. Heat maps using means were generated and color-coded to signify the level of communication skills expertise. Results A total of 320 participants (119 residents, 34 fellows, 78 medical students and 89 attendings) completed the survey. Most residents (58%) reported not having received formal communication skills training. Major barriers impeding effective patient-resident communication were long working hours, inadequate time, and difficulty understanding patients’ language (p < 0.001). Residents’ self-evaluation of communication skills was significantly higher than observer evaluations from faculty, fellows, and students, reflecting a lack of self-awareness and overestimation of communication expertise. Observer cohorts rated residents moderately on para-verbal communication skills while giving the lowest ratings for breaking bad news (mean 2.8, p-value <0.001) and residents’ experience in dealing with workplace conflicts (mean 2.8, p-value = 0.023). Conclusions Our study identified a clear and critical need for a structured, longitudinal, competency-based communication skills program for residents. Targeted efforts towards bridging the gaps in communication skills identified in this study can improve trainee communication skills expertise and augment patient satisfaction rates to improve the quality of care in developing countries.

Promoting leadership and communication skills in emergency medicine residents: the role of High-Fidelity Simulation

The residency program in Emergency Medicine should include formal training in Non-Technical Skills (NTS). We evaluated the effectiveness of a program based on High-Fidelity Simulation (HFS) to improve the leadership and communication skills of residents in Emergency Medicine. In this prospective observational study, we performed 6 simulation sessions, each with 3 scenarios about the management of the critically ill. In the second to the fifth session, participants received specific training about: the ABCDE (Airway, Breathing, Circulation, Disability, Exposure) approach, leadership, communication, and situation awareness, one topic per session. Technical Skills (TS) were measured as the percentage of critical actions correctly performed by participants during the primary examination. NTS were rated by the Leadership Behavior Description Questionnaire (LBDQ), Communication Competence Questionnaire (CCP), and Clinical Teamwork Scale (CTS). The trend over the following sessions was evaluated. We examined 90 scenarios, 15 scenarios per session (three scenarios repeated 5 times). The LBDQ score reached in the fifth and sixth sessions (fifth: 25 [20-30]; sixth: 25 [22-29]), was significantly higher than that obtained in the first, second, and third ones (first: 23 [18-24]; second: 22 [16-26]; third: 20 [14-26], all p&lt;0.05). The percentage of correctly performed actions during ABCDE assessment (10 [7-14] vs. 17 [15-19]), as well as CCQ scores (46 [42-48] vs. 51 [47-52]) and CTS scores (82 [64-88] vs. 94 [91-101], all p&lt;0.01), increased significantly between the first and the last session. HFS confirmed to be an effective instrument to allow Emergency Medicine residents to acquire NTS skills in a safe environment.

Inter- and Intrarater Reliability of the Gap-Kalamazoo Communication Skills Assessment Form Among Occupational Therapy Interns.

Effective communication skills (CS) are essential for occupational therapists. The Gap-Kalamazoo Communication Skills Assessment Form (GKCSAF) is a standard tool for assessing the CS of medical residents. However, the interrater reliability for the nine CS domain scores ranges from poor to good. The intrarater reliability remains unclear. To examine the inter- and intrarater reliability of the GKCSAF's nine domain scores and total score among occupational therapy interns. Repeated assessments with the GKCSAF. Medical center psychiatry department. Twenty-five interns and 49 clients with mental illness, recruited from August 2020 to December 2021. The transcripts of 50 evaluation interviews between clients and interns were used. Three independent raters assessed each transcript twice, at least 3 mo apart. The GKCSAF demonstrated poor interrater reliability for the nine domain scores (weighted κ = .08-.30) and the total score (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = .22, 95% confidence interval [CI] [.10, .35]). The GKCSAF showed poor to intermediate intrarater reliability for the nine domain scores (weighted κ = .27-.73) and fair reliability for the total score (ICC = .69, 95% CI [.60, .77]). The GKCSAF demonstrates poor interrater reliability and poor to intermediate intrarater reliability for the nine domain scores. However, it demonstrates fair intrarater reliability in assessing the overall CS performance of occupational therapy interns. Significant variations were observed when different raters assessed the same interns' CS, indicating inconsistencies in ratings. Consequently, it is advisable to conservatively interpret the CS ratings obtained with the GKCSAF. Plain-Language Summary: It is essential for occupational therapists to effectively communicate with clients. The Gap-Kalamazoo Communication Skills Assessment Form (GKCSAF) is a standard tool that is used to assess the communication skills of medical residents. The study authors used the GKCSAF with occupational therapy interns in a medical center psychiatry department to assess how effectively they interviewed clients with mental illness. This study aids occupational therapy personnel in the interpretation of GKCSAF results. The study findings also highlight the importance of developing reliable and standardized measures to assess communications skills in the field of occupational therapy.

Scientific Communication Initiative at a Medical Military Library

Implementation of new scholarly communication library service in the digital age is characterized by the competitive forces between the old library information services and the ambiguity of future information services. This research analyzes the development process of scientific initiative and collaborative partnership in the military medical library environment aimed to enhance the quality of scientific communication and information skills in military residents and clinicians. The hindering internal and external forces and facilitators of developing and implementing scientific initiative service in the military medical library are evaluated. The environmental analysis was conducted to determine the scholarly communication needs in the scholarly military medical environment. The ambassador-based model was used for the development of scientific communication initiative (SCI) at the military medical library. The SCI consisted of two components: library information communication and scientific communication. This implementation in the military medical environment enhanced scholarly communication, research skills development, and information education. A collaborative Scientific Hub, and liaison partnerships with military graduate medical education program directors and clinicians enhanced the scientific communication and information skills in residents. The Ambassador model, used in the development of scientific initiative in academic and military environments, was valuable for developing and implementing specialized interdisciplinary and multidisciplinary information services in the academic and military environment. Higher education hierarchy, educational needs, organizational hierarchy, academic culture, and educational environment influence the implementation of information services in academic and military environments.

Measures of Clinical Performance and Communication Skills of EM Residents on Simulated Resuscitations are not Correlated

Measures of Clinical Performance and Communication Skills of EM Residents on Simulated Resuscitations are not Correlated

A survey on the willingness of outpatients to participate in fundus examination procedures conducted by ophthalmology training residents in China: A cross-sectional study.

The National Standardized Training for Resident Doctors (STRD) in mainland China encounters many challenges in its implementation. To investigate whether outpatients are willing to undergo indirect ophthalmoscopy examination conducted by ophthalmology residents in the ophthalmology STRD program in China. This study conducted a cross-sectional survey at the Eye Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University between September 2021 and September 2023. A cohort of 300 initial outpatients requiring indirect ophthalmoscopy examinations were enlisted from the outpatient department. Based on whether the patients are willing to undergo an indirect ophthalmoscopy examination by resident doctors, patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 (willing) and Group 2 (unwilling), and their questionnaire responses were comparatively analyzed. A total of 261/300 (87%) valid questionnaires were returned in the survey, which included 149 males and 112 females. No notable gender difference (p = 0.400) or disparity in medical expense categories (p = 0.786) was observed between the two groups. However, variables such as outpatient marital status (p = 0.002), the presence of training faculty during fundus examinations with residents and outpatients (p < 0.001), the demeanor of training residents toward patients (p < 0.001), and the quality of doctor-patient communication (p < 0.001) significantly varied between the groups. The level of outpatients' cooperation with ophthalmology residents during fundus examinations in the Chinese ophthalmology STRD program was observed to be low. Enhancing the presence of training faculty during examinations and enhancing the communication skills of training residents could significantly improve this situation.

Improving the Procedure of Delivering Serious News: Impact of a Six-Month Curriculum for Second Year Pediatric Residents.

Objective: We implemented and studied a novel curriculum that combined role play, didactic education, and the use of a procedure card for asynchronous learning to improve second-year pediatric residents' skills in delivering serious news. Design: Phase 1 established baseline performance with a self-efficacy survey and observed simulation delivering serious news. Phase 2 included directed education of participants with a validated communication skills training framework. During Phase 3, participants were instructed to review the communication procedure card as a just-in-time reference prior to delivering serious news to patients and their families over 6months. Following this period, participants completed a second self-efficacy survey and engaged in another observed simulation session delivering serious news. Pre and post intervention performance and self-efficacy were compared. Results: A total of 21 out of 26 (81%) participants completed all phases of this study. Participants had a statistically significant increase (p < .001) in self-efficacy scores post-intervention compared to pre-intervention for each of the skills to effectively deliver serious news: assess understanding, communicate news clearly, allow for silence, respond to emotion, and equip for next steps. Additionally, investigator assessments of participants showed an overall statistically significant improvement (p < .001) in all five communication skills post intervention compared to pre intervention. Conclusions: This curriculum resulted in significantly improved self-efficacy and observed ratings of communication skills in second-year pediatric residents over a 6-month period.

Analyzing communication skills of Dentistry Post Graduate Residents with Geriatric Patients in Clinical Encounter by using Video Recordings

Background: An effective communication between the doctor and patient is the foremost factor in establishing good interpersonal relationships. This comprises of both verbal and non-verbal communicators. Particularly in the geriatric population, communication can be hindered due to physiological and psychological deterioration. This study was designed to assess the communication skills of dentistry postgraduate residents (PGRs), with their geriatric patients and provide a baseline for the shortcomings and improvements. Methods: Four postgraduate residents of both genders were selected to take clinical interviews of geriatric patients. Audio-video recordings were made by an expert and reviewed by all researchers. The interviews were transcribed individually and thematic analysis was done. Open and axial coding was done for data organization under themes and subthemes. Results: Data transcription led to initial generation of 61 codes. These codes were categorized under nine codes through axial coding and grouping of similar codes. Persistent overlapping of content was found in data transcription, which may indicate data saturation. Conclusion: Workshop-trained postgraduate students of dentistry demonstrated relatively instrumental communication skills at their clinical encounter with geriatric patients. However, the professional demeanor demands further finesse in soft skills, which can be achieved through its regular practice.

A Novel Serious Illness Communication Curriculum Improves Neurology Residents' Confidence and Skills.

Background and Purpose: Competency in serious illness communication is mandated by the Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education. Previous efforts to teach communication skills have been hampered by intensive time requirements. In this study, we developed and evaluated a brief goals-of-care communication curriculum for neurology residents. Methods: We developed and implemented a two-part curriculum based on themes identified from a needs assessment: (1) fundamental physician-patient communication skills; and (2) counseling surrogate decision makers and providing neuroprognostication. We used a three-pronged pre-post study design to evaluate the impact of the curriculum: resident self-assessment surveys, direct observations of resident-patient interactions, and patient perception surveys using the Communication Assessment Tool. Results: Residents reported a significant increase in mean scores [standard deviation] of confidence practicing fundamental communication skills, such as offering opportunities for emotion (3.84 [0.9] vs. 4.54 [0.6], p = 0.002), and goals-of-care communication skills, such as using triggers for serious conversations (2.65 [0.7] vs. 3.29 [0.5], p = 0.004). Observed resident-patient interactions showed significant improvement in fundamental communication skills, such as involving the patient in decision making (1.89 [0.6] vs. 4.0 [0.9], p < 0.001). There was no significant impact on patient perception of resident communication skills in the three months following the intervention. Conclusions: A brief, learner-centered curricular intervention improved neurology residents' confidence in serious illness communication and improved their skills as judged by trained observers.

Interpersonal Communication Skills Of Pediatric Residents Of Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital, Eastern Uttar Pradesh, India: A Pilot Study

Introduction: Effective communication set a platform where parents feel connected with his or her doctors, which can ultimately improve health, mediated through participation in care.&#x0D; Aims: To Assess the interpersonal communication skills of Paediatric resident doctors.&#x0D; Settings and Design: Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital, Eastern Uttar Pradesh, India.&#x0D; Methods and Material: - A cross-sectional study was conducted among all Pediatrics trainee residents working in department of Pediatrics, Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital, Eastern Uttar Pradesh, India. A standardized self-administered questionnaire (Interpersonal Communication Skill Inventory) was used to assess the IPC skills. The inventory has four sections which includes, delivering clear messages, active listening, giving and getting feedback and handling of emotional interaction while communications.&#x0D; Statistical analysis used: The data were tabulated and analyzed with SPSS-19 and Fisher exact probability test was used to compare the data.&#x0D; Results: Total of 45 residents was assessed, male were 19 and female were 26. Age of resident doctors was between 25 to 30 yrs. Out of 45 residents, 57.8% were confident in sending the clear messages 31.1% were active listener, 20% were confident in giving and the getting the feedback, and 15.5% were confident in handling the Emotional Interactions. Female residents were confident in giving and getting feedback (p=0.01) and handling emotional interactions (p=0.03). Increased in experiences improves handling emotional interactions (p=0.03)&#x0D; Conclusions: The delivering clear messages and active listening during conversation improved with experience whereas, to improve skills like handling emotional interaction and giving and the getting feedback of resident doctor would require structured training program.

The Patient's Voice in Assessing Resident Communication Skills

To generate validity evidence for using patient-reported satisfaction ratings of residents' communication skills to determine progress along the Interpersonal and Communication Skills (ICS) Milestones. A single-institution, retrospective study analyzed a CAHPS Clinician and Group Survey (CG-CAHPS) database which collects inpatients' ratings of residents' communication skills using 6 questions on a scale of 1 (very poor) to 5 (very good). CG-CAHPS results for each resident were averaged for each question as well as across the 6 questions. The averaged ratings were compared between low and high performer groups. A large, academic, mid-western General Surgery residency program. General Surgery residents with 3 or more survey responses from July 2020 to June 2021 were included. Residents were dichotomized into low or high performer groups based on their end-of-year ICS1 sub-competency milestone within their post-graduate year (PGY) cohort. 543 CG-CAHPS responses across 44 residents were analyzed with a median of 9 (Interquartile range 6, 17) responses per resident. When residents were compared based on PGY, ratings for the question "resident's knowledge about your medical care of condition" demonstrated statistically significant differences with PGY5s receiving the lowest score (p = 0.05). PGY5s received the lowest averaged ratings across all questions (p = 0.08, η2 = 0.10). When residents were dichotomized into low (n = 21) and high performer groups (n = 23) based on ICS1 milestones, statistically significant differences were noted in ratings for the questions "concern the resident showed for your questions or worries" (4.81 vs. 5, p = 0.047) and "courtesy and respect of the resident" (4.75 vs. 5, p = 0.046). Analysis of patient ratings of surgery residents' communication skills demonstrated concordant findings between ICS1 milestone and 2 domains of CG-CAHPS responses. When low and high performer groups were compared, CG-CAHPS responses demonstrated a similar pattern. These findings provide validity evidence for CG-CAHPS data as a source of information for ICS1 sub-competency assessment.

Development of Patient-centered Communication Curriculum for Radiation Oncology Residents

<h3>Background</h3> Radiation oncologists often speak with patients who are terminally ill and may be near the end of their life. In fact, up to 63% of patients who died of cancer receive palliative radiation in their last year of life. Despite this, training on palliative care including patient-centered communication skills for radiation oncology residents is lacking. This prompted the development of a serious illness communication curriculum designed for radiation oncology residents. <h3>Methods</h3> Curriculum development followed Kern's Six-step approach. A national survey of radiation oncology residency program directors outlined the lack of communication training and served as a general needs assessment. We performed an institution-specific targeted needs assessment with a cross-sectional survey and semi-structured interviews that reaffirmed a convincing need at the residency program level for a practice-based patient-centered communication skills training program. The objectives, educational strategies, implementation, and evaluation of the curriculum were then developed to target identified deficiencies in resident communication skills. <h3>Results</h3> Data from the targeted needs assessment showed that most residents felt only "somewhat prepared" (Likert 3/5) to discuss important topics such as prognosis (93%), reconciling the seriousness of one's illness (71%), and discontinuing life-sustaining treatments (64%). When asked how they might improve these skills some residents remarked, "practicing conversations," "observing others," and "learning best practices for these situations." A baseline radiation-specific simulated patient encounter was performed at the university's simulation-based learning center. Then, two virtual half-day teaching sessions led by expert faculty facilitators were held. These consisted of didactic learning and mentored resident practice with simulated patients and real time feedback. All teaching and practice were designed for radiation oncology residents. A post-course simulated patient encounter will be performed. Faculty trained in serious illness communication who did not participate in the course will then review the simulated patient encounters and complete a blinded standardized assessment to compare pre- and post-course measurable communication skills. <h3>Discussion</h3> We developed a practice-based patient-centered communication skills curriculum for radiation oncology residents. We expect this work in progress will show measurable improvement of these skills. We plan to integrate this curriculum on a regular, repeating basis for additional skill development and to facilitate durable learning. We hope this course can serve as an adaptable model that can be instituted among radiation oncology residency programs.

Strengthening Parent – Physician Communication: A Mixed Methods Study on Attuned Communication Training for Pediatric Residents

Problem : High-quality communication improves patient satisfaction and clinical outcomes, yet formal communication training in residency is often minimal. Many studies on empathic communication show mixed results and are often hindered and skewed by brief study lengths, insufficiently and ambiguously defined concepts, and limited methods for objective measurements. Intervention : The FAN Curriculum is a unique communication curriculum, based on the conceptual frameworks of patient-centered communication, reflective practice, mindfulness, and attunement using the Facilitating Attuned Interactions (FAN) model. The first part of the FAN Curriculum was delivered as a 3-hour interactive workshop involving didactics, group discussion, and role play with pediatric residents. Residents then completed weekly self-reflections, a follow-up one-hour training to reinforce concepts, and five monthly mentor sessions, all emphasizing reflective practice. Context : This longitudinal, mixed-methods study examined the effects of the FAN Curriculum on residents’ empathy levels and ability to communicate with parents in the clinical setting. The study was conducted at two urban, academic, medium-sized pediatric residency programs in Chicago between October 2016 and November 2017. First- and second-year pediatric residents whose continuity clinic site was located at their home institution participated. Residents received training in the use of the FAN Communication Tool using a delayed-start crossover study design. Impact : At five time points, residents and parents completed instruments validated for measuring physician empathy and mindfulness. Post-study interviews were conducted for one institution’s residents and mentors and were evaluated using open and focused coding. Participants (n = 23) demonstrated a high degree of use of the FAN Communication Tool six months post-training and a significant rise in self-reported comfort with four of five FAN core processes. One parent-completed survey (Consultation and Relational Empathy, CARE) showed a statistically significant rise of 3.26% in resident relational empathy and collaboration after training (p = 0.02). In qualitative analysis of interviews, residents and mentors found the FAN Communication Tool beneficial, making clinic visits more efficient and collaborative. Both groups noted improvement in the residents’ relationship-building skills; residents were able to use enhanced communication skills to better approach challenging encounters and work through parent concerns. Lessons Learned : Family-centered communication training can improve physician-perceived empathy and mindfulness. Effective communication for pediatric residents incorporates an empathic approach, and introduction to this formal curriculum supported their growth in connecting and engaging with children and parents. The FAN Curriculum may provide a useful method for improving resident communication skills with a positive impact on pediatricians’ collaboration with patients and families.

An educational intervention to facilitate appropriate subspecialty referrals: a study assessing resident communication skills

BackgroundOur goal was to improve pediatric residents' advanced communication skills in the setting of referral to address the entrustable professional activity of subspecialty referral identified by the American Board of Pediatrics. To accomplish this aim, we created a referral and consultation curriculum to teach and assess core communication skills in subspecialty referral involving an adolescent with syncope, an anxiety-provoking symptom that is rarely associated with serious pathology.MethodsWe utilized blended multimodal educational interventions to improve resident communication skills in referral of patients. Trainees participated in 1) an interactive online module on syncope focusing on “red-flag” symptoms that would warrant a subspecialty cardiology referral and 2) a 4-h intervention with Standardized Parents (SPs), focusing on the case-based application of communication skills. Communication skills were assessed by two pre- and post- Objective Structured Clinical Examination encounters of patients with syncope, with an SP evaluation using a 20-item checklist. Analysis was performed with Sign test and McNemar’s test. Trainees provided feedback on a Critical Incident Questionnaire, which was analyzed qualitatively.ResultsSixty-four residents participated. There was an overall improvement in communication skills based on SP scores (82.7 ± 10.9% to 91.7 ± 5.0%, p < 0.001), and 13/20 items demonstrated significant improvement post-intervention. Residents’ improved performance enabled them to address patient/family emotions, explain referral logistics, and clarify concerns to agree on a plan.ConclusionsBy participating in this curriculum, residents’ communication skills improved immediately post-intervention. Further research is needed to assess if this intervention improves patient care by providing residents with enduring skills to judiciously manage the referral process.

Teaching and Assessing Communication Skills in Pediatric Residents: How Do Parents Think We Are Doing?

Curricula designed to teach and assess the communication skills of pediatric residents variably integrates the parent perspective. We compared pediatric residents' communication skills in an objective structured clinical exam (OSCE) case as assessed by Family Faculty (FF), parents of pediatric patients, versus standardized patients (SP). Residents participated in an OSCE case with a SP acting as a patient's parent. We compared resident performance as assessed by FF and SP with a behaviorally-anchored checklist. Items were rated as not done, partly done or well done, with well-done indicating mastery. The residents evaluated the experience. 42 residents consented to study participation. FF assessed a lower percentage of residents as demonstrating skill mastery as compared to SP in 19 of the 23 behaviors. There was a significant difference between FF and SP for Total Mastery Score and Mastery of the Competency Scores in three domains (Respect and Value, Information Sharing and Participation in Care and Decision Making). The majority of residents evaluated the experience favorably. Involving parents of pediatric patients in the instructive and assessment components of a communication curriculum for pediatric residents adds a unique perspective and integrates the true stakeholders in parent-physician communication.

Developing a multi-departmental residency communication coaching program.

Local needs assessments in our institution's surgery and neurology residency programs identified barriers to effective communication, such as no shared communication framework and limited feedback on nontechnical clinical skills. Residents identified faculty-led coaching as a desired educational intervention to improve communication skills. Three university departments (Surgery, Neurology, and Pediatrics) and health-care system leaders collaborated closely to develop an innovative communication coaching initiative generalizable to other residency programs. Coaching program development involved several layers of collaboration between health-care system leaders, faculty educators, and departmental communication champions. The efforts included: (1) creating and delivering communication skills training to faculty and residents; (2) hosting frequent meetings among various stakeholders to develop program strategy, discuss opportunities and learnings, and engage other medical educators interested in coaching; (3) obtaining funding to implement the coaching initiative; (4) selecting coaches and providing salary and training support. A multi-phased mixed-methods study utilized online surveys and virtual semi-structured interviews to assess the program's quality and impact on the communication culture and the satisfaction and communication skills of residents. Quantitative and qualitative data have been integrated during data collection and analysis using embedding, building, and merging strategies. Establishing a multi-departmental coaching program may be feasible and can be adapted by other programs if similar resources and focus are present. We found that stakeholders' buy-in, financial support, protected faculty time, flexible approach, and rigorous evaluation are crucial factors in successfully implementing and sustaining such an initiative.

Examining doctor-patient communication skills among senior medical students based on calgary cambridge observation guide.

Background: This study aimed to determine the level of communication skills in residents of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences in the final year of the main courses in accordance with the Calgary Cambridge Observation Guide for the purpose of improving their skills and improving the quality and correcting the existing problems. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 190 residents of 14 majors were evaluated using a checklist of patient and physician communication skills based on the Calgary Cambridge Guide that has been localized in Persian language and culture using the cross-cultural adaptation standard in 6 stages. Content validity was verified by the primary author. The skills within the 71-item checklist were examined via a 3-point Likert-type rating scale, with scores ranging from 1 to 3 (good to poor) and the data were analyzed using the SPSS 16 software. Results: Of the190 residents, 161 were enrolled in the study. Of them 74 were internal and 87 surgical residents, and 89 were male and 72 were female. The mean score of the total communication skills in 14 major courses was 128.68±37.2264; it was 121.7±36.990 in the Department of Surgery, and 136.8±36.073 in the Department of Internal Medicine, with p=0.010, in female students 126.6 and in male student 130.3 with p=0.500. Conclusion: The score of 71 communication skills points in the list was prepared using the Likert scale option 3. In the overall skills, the weak score is 71 to 118.33, the average score is 118.34 to 165.66, and the good score is 165.67 to 213. Based on the findings of the study and examining the educational curriculum, it can be stated that unlike in psychiatry with an average score of 168.83, which is at a good level, the other fields are not well-developed and overall the communication skills in the residents, with a mean score of 128.68, are moderately poor and therefore further education and training is needed in these fields for resident students.

Improving Radiation Oncology (RO) Resident Communication Skills by Leveraging the DiSC Assessment Tool

Difficulty adapting to new communication styles on interprofessional teams can result in dysfunction that can negatively affect patient care and team morale. Communication skill development is recognized as important in medicine but remains poorly implemented in postgraduate medical training.1 As part of our RO resident leadership curriculum, we piloted a session on enhancing team communication to bridge this gap.

Correlation of attending and patient assessment of resident communication skills in the emergency department.

Communication and interpersonal skills are one of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education's six core competencies. Validated methods for assessing these among trainees are lacking. Educators have developed various communication assessment tools from both the supervising attending and the patient perspectives. How these different assessment methods and tools compare with each other remains unknown. The goal of this study was to determine the degree of agreement between attending and patient assessment of resident communication skills. This was a retrospective study of emergency medicine (EM) residents at an academic medical center. From July 2017 to June 2018, residents were assessed on communication skills during their emergency department shifts by both their supervising attending physicians and their patients. The attendings rated residents' communication skills with patients, colleagues, and nursing/ancillary staff using a 1 to 5 Likert scale. Patients completed the modified Communication Assessment Tool (CAT), a 14-item questionnaire based on a 1 to 5 Likert scale. Mean attending ratings and patient CAT scores were calculated for each resident. Means were divided into tertiles due to nonparametric distribution of scores. Agreement between attending and patient ratings of residents were measured using Cohen's kappa for each attending evaluation question. Scores were weighted to assign adjacent tertiles partial agreement. During the study period, 1,097 attending evaluations and 952 patient evaluations were completed for 26 residents. Attending scores and CAT scores of the residents showed slight to fair agreement in the following three domains: patient communication (κ= 0.21), communication with colleagues (κ= 0.21), and communication with nursing/ancillary staff (κ= 0.26). Attending and patient ratings of EM residents' communication skills show slight to fair agreement. The use of different types of raters may be beneficial in fully assessing trainees' communication skills.

The McMaster Advanced Communication Competencies Model for Psychiatry (MACC Model).

Communication is a core competency for all physicians in training. In Canada, the importance of communication during residency is recognized through the CanMEDS framework. Although literature exists around teaching communication skills to residents, research in psychiatry residents is lacking. The purpose of this study was to explore how faculty members conceptualize the development of communication skills in psychiatry residents and develop a model reflecting this. The authors used a constructivist grounded theory approach. Purposive sampling was used to select 14 faculty educators who regularly supervise psychiatry residents in a single university-based residency training program. Semi-structured interviews were conducted to explore educators' perceptions of how communication skills develop during residency. Constant comparative analysis occurred concurrently with data collection until thematic theoretical sufficiency was reached and relationships between themes determined. Five themes underlie the McMaster Advanced Communication Competencies model, describing the progressive development of communication abilities in residents. Three themes identify foundational sets of abilities including: refining common foundational relational abilities, developing foundational specific psychiatric communication abilities, and learning to reflect upon and manage internal reactions. These foundational pillars then allow residents to develop a personalized art of flexible psychiatric interviewing, and skillfully partner with patients in co-creating care plans. This research describes a preliminary communication competency model for teaching and assessing psychiatry residents. It defines the core communication abilities required for residents to progress to independent practice. Future research could explore and test the model's validity and transferability.