The use of repeated pulmonary resection for metachronous pulmonary metastasis has increased. We assessed whether video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) produced greater benefits than classic thoracotomy for repeated pulmonary metastasectomy procedures. A total of 46 patients who had undergone two or more pulmonary metastasectomies from 1995 to 2008 were analyzed in this study. These patients were classified into four groups as follows: group A (previous VATS/present VATS); group B (previous VATS/present thoracotomy); group C (previous thoracotomy/present VATS); group D (previous thoracotomy/present thoracotomy). The clinical features of these four groups were then compared. The operating time and the duration of thoracic drainage were longer in group D than in group A or B. The operating time was also longer in group C than in group A. Intraoperative bleeding was greater in group D patients than in other three groups. There were no discernible morbidities resulting from VATS in groups A or C. No differences were found in the occurrence of relapse among the groups. The mean interval from the previous to the present pulmonary metastasectomy also did not differ significantly among groups. VATS can result in a shortened operating time, reduced intraoperative bleeding, and generally fewer complications compared with repeated classic thoracotomy. VATS is also potentially a curative procedure as it is not inferior to classic thoracotomy in terms of the relapse rate after repeated pulmonary metastasectomy.