Resection Of Parapharyngeal Space Tumors Research Articles

Risk factors of first bite syndrome after surgical resection of parapharyngeal space tumors

First bite syndrome is a complication of surgical resection of parapharyngeal space tumors and the development of cramping pain in the parotid region with the first bite of a meal. The present study aimed to identify the potential risk factors for the development of first bite syndrome.We retrospectively reviewed 30 consecutive patients with parapharyngeal space tumors who had been surgically treated between August 2003 and December 2015 at our department.The tumor site (prestyloid or retrostyloid) and surgical approach (transcervical-parotid, transparotid, or transcervical) were not correlated with the development of first bite syndrome. Ligation and mobilization of the external carotid artery was significantly correlated with the development of first bite syndrome. Moreover, patients with complete resection of the parotid gland did not experience first bite syndrome.The present findings suggest that concomitant surgical settings of 1) sympathetic denervation of the parotid gland with ligation of the external carotid artery or injury of the sympathetic nerve plexus around the external carotid artery during its mobilization, and 2) residual parotid gland tissue are risk factors for the development of first bite syndrome after surgical resection of parapharyngeal space tumors. J. Med. Invest. 70 : 150-153, February, 2023.

A Retrospective Analysis on the Effects and Complications of Endoscope-Assisted Transoral Approach and Lateral Cervical Approach in the Resection of Parapharyngeal Space Tumors.

Objective To observe and compare the effects and complications of endoscope-assisted transoral approach and lateral cervical approach in the resection of parapharyngeal space (PSS) tumors. Methods From January 2013 to September 2021, 69 patients with parapharyngeal space tumors in the Affiliated Hospital of Jiangnan University were divided into the control group (n = 37) and the observation group (n = 32) according to the mode of operation. The tumors in the parapharyngeal space were resected by the lateral cervical approach in the control group, and the tumors in the parapharyngeal space were removed by endoscopy-assisted transoral approach in the observation group. The general clinical data and operation conditions of the two groups, including operative blood loss, operation time, drainage volume and drainage time, hospital stay, perioperative pain degree, and tumor resection rate were collected and analyzed statistically. The patients were followed up for 6 months, and the complications of the two groups were recorded. Results Compared with the control group, the operation time in the observation group was significantly shorter, and the amount of intraoperative bleeding in the observation group was significantly less than that in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The postoperative drainage was less and the hospital stay in the observation group was shorter than that in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in tumor resection rate between the two groups. The visual analog scale (VAS) score on the 1st and 3rd day after operation in the observation group was lower than that in the control group. After treatment, some patients in the two groups had complications such as nerve injury, dysphagia, difficulty in mouth opening, massive hemorrhage, and parotid fistula. The total incidence of complications in the observation group was lower than that in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Conclusions The effect of the endoscope-assisted transoral approach is similar to that of the lateral cervical approach in the resection of tumors in parapharyngeal space, but the endoscope-assisted transoral approach has shorter operation time, less intraoperative bleeding, and less postoperative drainage. The indwelling time and hospital stay of the drainage device were shorter than those of the patients with transcervical approach, and the perioperative stress response of patients with endoscope-assisted transoral approach is mild, which is beneficial to the physical and mental recovery of the patients.

Indications for resection of parapharyngeal space tumors by transoral robotic surgery and prevention and treatment of complications

Objective:This study investigated the clinical indications, prevention and management of common complications of TORS resection of parapharyngeal space tumors. Methods:The clinical data of 23 patients with parapharyngeal space tumors treated with TORS in the Eye & ENT Hospital of Fudan University from July 2020 to February 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The surgical methods were divided into simple TORS surgery and TORS combined endoscopic or cervical surgery. The surgical incision can be directly sutured or partially sutured. If the surgical cavity is below the oropharyngeal plane and there is a risk of airway compression, preventive tracheotomy would be performed. No drainage（15 cases） or transnasal negative pressure drainage tube（8 cases） was placed in the operation cavity. In 17 cases, tumors were located between the top of nasopharynx and the lower boundary of oropharynx and these patients underwent simple TORS surgery; one case received combined cervical and endoscopic surgery, as the tumor was located near the skull base with unclear boundary with the deep lobe of parotid gland; five cases underwent combined endoscopic surgery, as the tumor reached the upper part of the nasopharynx or the outer part of the parapharyngeal space. Results:One case underwent emergency hemostasis for postoperative bleeding, and three cases underwent puncture and drainage for postoperative effusion. No complication occurred such as postoperative infection and airway obstruction. The healing grade of surgical incision and surgical cavity in transnasal drainage group was significantly better than that in non-drainage group. Conclusion:TORS operation is a safe and minimally invasive method in treating parapharyngeal space tumors with appropriate size and location. Postoperative effusion is a common complication after TORS. In case that surgical cavity extends to the deep parapharyngeal space or the lower part of the surgical cavity is beneath the surgical incision, the placement of transnasal negative pressure drainage tube after operation can improve postoperative recovery and reduce the incidence of complications such as effusion and infection.

Resection of Parapharyngeal Space Tumors Located in the Prestyloid Compartment: Efficacy of the Cervical Approach.

Parapharyngeal space tumors are rare. Among them, tumors in the prestyloid compartment are particularly suitable for surgery; however, there are no detailed reports of such surgery and their features remain unknown. We conducted a retrospective cohort study. For 67 surgical cases of benign tumors in this compartment, we examined the patient and tumor characteristics, fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC), and intraoperative details such as surgical approach, use of complete excision, and postoperative complications. Pleomorphic adenomas (PAs) comprised 73.1% of the lesions. The diagnostic accuracy of FNAC to differentiate benign and malignant tumors was 97.7%. Of the treated lesions, 94.0% were removed via the cervical approach alone, including all PAs. The remaining 6.0% were resected via the cervical-parotid approach. The median operative time and bleeding volume were 89min and 50mL, respectively. Operative time using the cervical approach was significantly shorter (p=0.021). All cases could be treated via complete surgical excision. Postoperative complications occurred in 32.8% of patients, with transient slight facial palsy being the most common. No fatal complications occurred and 92.5% of patients had no sequelae. There was no significant association between complications and surgical approach. Based on diagnosis by FNAC, with a high accuracy rate, most benign prestyloid tumors, especially PAs, were resected using the cervical approach alone, with a shorter operative time and without severe complications.

The advantage and disadvantage of transoral orbotic surgery for parapharyngeal tumors: a systemic review

Parapharyngeal space tumors are rare. According to the size, location, relationship with the vascular nerves, benign and malignant tumors, different surgical approaches are used. This article reviews surgical techniques, indications, complications and current advantages and disadvantages of transoral robotic surgery (TORS) for resection of parapharyngeal space tumors. To provide reference for the application of TORS in parapharyngeal space tumor surgery.

Endoscopy-Assisted Transoral Versus Endoscopy-Assisted Transcervical Minimal Incision Plus Mandibular Osteotomy Approach in Resection of Large Parapharyngeal Space Tumors

Resection of the parapharyngeal space is often challenging. This study aims to evaluate the outcome of the endoscopy-assisted transoral approach for resection of the parapharyngeal space tumors compared with the endoscopy-assisted transcervical approach. Twenty-three consecutive patients (15 males, 8 females) who underwent resection of large parapharyngeal space tumors via endoscopy-assisted transoral (ETO) approach or endoscopy-assisted transcervical minimal incision plus osteotomy of the vertical ramus outside the mandibular foramen (ETC + MO) approach were analyzed retrospectively. The tumors in ETO group are benign; there are 2 patients with adenoid cystic carcinoma and 1 patient with recurrent pleomorphic adenoma in ETC + MO group. All of the tumors were removed completely and without rupture. No major complications developed in any patient. Temporary facial paresis occurred in 1 patient in the ETC + MO group, which resolved spontaneously within 8 weeks. The cosmetic effects of all patients in ETO groups and 10 patients in ETC + MO groups were excellent. Patients were followed up for 7 to 26 months, no recurrence was encountered. ETO and ETC + MO approach in resection of large parapharyngeal space tumors are feasible and safe technique that achieve excellent aesthetic and functional results. Endoscopy-assisted transoral approach can shorten hospitalized time and avoid the risk of marginal mandibular nerve injury and ETC + MO approach may be used in malignant or recurrent parapharyngeal space tumors.

A comparative study of the endoscopy-assisted transoral approach versus external approaches for the resection of large benign parapharyngeal space tumors

The advantages and limitations of the endoscopy-assisted transoral approach (EATA) and external approaches (EAs) in resection of parapharyngeal space tumors (PSTs) remain unclear. In our study, we compared the use of the EATA and the EAs for the resection of large, benign PSTs. Forty-four patients with PSTs were divided into the EATA and EA groups. The perioperative and postoperative outcomes of the patients were evaluated. All of the tumors were completely removed. However, the procedure was converted to an open procedure for four patients in the EATA group and for six patients in the EA group who required endoscopic assistance. The intraoperative blood loss, amount and duration of drainage, postoperative pain, total hospital stay, and cosmetic outcomes were superior in the EATA group (P<.05). Use of the EATA for resection of large, benign PSTs decreased the surgical invasiveness of the procedure and resulted in better aesthetic outcomes. However, use of the combined surgical approach allowed for improved access for the resection of PSTs.

Resection of parapharyngeal neoplasms via styloid diaphragm approach

To evaluate the surgical technique and efficacy of the resection of parapharyngeal space neoplasm via styloid diaphragm approach. Thirty-three cases underwent the resection of parapharyngeal space tumors via styloid diaphragm approach from Jan 2005 to Jan 2011 were reviewed. Of the cases, 28 were with benign tumors treated by surgery alone, and 5 were malignant tumors treated by surgery plus postoperative radical radiotherapy. The parapharyngeal neoplasms in all cases were completely resected via styloid diaphragm approach. The postoperative follow-up ranged from 13 months to 7 years (median = 4.6 years). No tumor recurrence was found in 30 cases, but 3 cases experienced tumor recurrence, including 1 chondrosarcoma (3 years after surgery and chemoradiotherapy), 1 chordoma and 1 adenoid cystic carcinoma (5 years after surgery and radiotherapy). Severe postoperative complications were not observed, but 2 cases showed mild mouth askew and fully recovered after 3 months, and 1 case was complicated with hoarseness and cough symptoms that disappeared after heteropathy. Resection of parapharyngeal neoplasms via styloid diaphragm approach is an ideal surgical technique, with well-exposed surgical field, less tissue injury, and less postoperative complication.