Resectable Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Research Articles

The Oncological Stress Test of Neoadjuvant Therapy: A Systematic Review in Outcomes of Neoadjuvant Therapy Compared to Upfront Resection Approach for Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma.

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma, increasingly diagnosed in the United States, has a disheartening initial resection rate of 15%. Neoadjuvant therapy, particularly FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine-based regimens, is gaining favor for its potential to improve resectability rates and achieving microscopically negative margins (R0) in borderline resectable cases, marked by intricate arterial or venous involvement. Despite surgery being the sole curative approach, actual benefit of neoadjuvant therapy remains debatable. This study scrutinizes current literature on oncological outcomes post-resection of borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. A MEDLINE/PubMed search was conducted to systematically compare oncological outcomes of patients treated with either neoadjuvant therapy with intent of curative resection or an "upfront resection" approach. A total of 1293 studies were initially screened and 30 were included (n = 1714) in this analysis. All studies included data on outcomes of patients with borderline resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma being treated with neoadjuvant therapy (n = 1387) or a resection-first approach (n = 356). Patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy underwent resection 52% of the time, achieving negative margins of 43% (n = 601). Approximately 77% of patients who received an upfront resection underwent a successful resection, with 39% achieving negative margins. Neoadjuvant therapy remains marginally efficacious in treatment of borderline resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma, as patients undergo an operation and successful resection less often when treated with neoadjuvant therapy. Rates of curative resection are comparable, despite neoadjuvant therapy being a primary recommendation in borderline resectable cases and employed more often than upfront resection. Upfront resection may offer improved resection rates by intention-to-treat, which can provide more patients with paths to curative resection.

Preoperative chemo-CIRT in Re/BRe pancreatic cancer: Insights from a multicenter prospective phase II clinical study (NCT03822936).

There is debate about the optimal management of borderline resectable (bRe) and resectable (Re) pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Both preclinical and clinical evidence showed that carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) produces superior control on radioresistant histologies compared to conventional photon beam radiotherapy (RT). However, so far there is a lack of data concerning the integration of CIRT in a multimodal approach with chemotherapy and surgery for bRe/Re. We recently presented the first analysis of a multicenter prospective phase II clinical study aimed at assessing the feasibility and effectiveness of a neoadjuvant chemotherapy + short course of CIRT followed by surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy in the management of bRe/Re PDAC. The study was terminated early due to low patient enrollment.Herein, we reported a post-hoc analysis focusing on toxicity, dosimetry and translational assessment. In our experience, CIRT can be integrated into a multimodal treatment strategy for bRe/Re PDAC, alongside chemotherapy and surgery. A case of fatal liver failure occurring three months post-surgery has been documented, likely related to the combination approach. Although the treatment plans were satisfactory according to the Local Effect Model (LEM) model, recalculations using the modified Microdosimetric Kinetic Model (mMKM) revealed suboptimal target coverage. Additionally, we observed an increased expression of PD-L1 following CIRT. This multimodal approach was well tolerated; however, clinicians should carefully monitor for vascular disorders during follow-up and further investigate surgical techniques after CIRT. The increased PD-L1 expression supports the immunogenic effects of particle therapy and lays the groundwork for future studies. To enhance the therapeutic ratio of CIRT treatments, integrating dose-averaged LETd (LETd-based objectives into the plan optimization process should be considered. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03822936.

Adjuvant Modified FOLFIRINOX for Resected Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma (PDAC): Clinical Insights and Genomic Features from a Large Contemporary Cohort.

Adjuvant mFOLFIRINOX (mFFX) is standard of care for fit individuals with resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). There are limited data on adjuvant mFFX outcomes outside clinical trials. Institutional databases queried to identify patients with resected PDAC who received ≥1 dose adjuvant mFFX. Primary endpoints: recurrence free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints: clinical factors, genomic features associated with outcomes. RFS and OS were estimated with Kaplan-Meier. Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to associate clinico-genomic features correlated with survival outcomes. N = 147 identified between 01/2015-01/2023. Median age: 67 years; N = 57 (39%) >70 years. Unfavorable prognostic features: N = 52 (36%) N2 nodal status, N = 115 (78%) lymphovascular invasion), and N = 133 (90%) perineural invasion. Median time from surgery to start mFFX: 1.78 months (m) (IQR 1.45, 2.12). N = 124 (84%) completed 12 doses; N = 98 (67%) stopped oxaliplatin early for neuropathy (median 10 doses; range 4-12). Further dosing characteristics are summarized in Supplementary Table 3. With median follow up of 35.1 m, median RFS (mRFS) 26 m (95% CI 19, 39) and median OS (mOS) not reached. For >70 cohort, mRFS 23 m (95% CI 14, NR) and mOS 51 m (95% CI 37, NR). mFFX started <8 weeks from resection associated with improved RFS (HR 0.62; 95% CI 0.41, 0.96; p = .033) and OS (HR 0.53; 95% CI 0.3, 0.94; p = .030). KRAS mutation and whole genome doubling trended to shorter RFS and OS. Homologous recombination deficiency status did not confer improved survival outcomes. Adjuvant mFFX is effective and tolerable in resected PDAC in a non-trial setting, including for patients >70 years.

The preoperative prediction of lymph node metastasis of resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma using dual-layer spectral computed tomography.

To investigate the value of dual-layer spectral computed tomography (DLCT) parameters derived from primary tumors in predicting lymph node metastasis (LNM) of resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). In this retrospective study, patients with resectable PDAC who underwent DLCT within 2-week intervals before surgery were enrolled and randomly divided into training and validation sets at a 7:3 ratio. The patients' clinical data, CT morphological features, and DLCT parameters were analyzed. Univariate and multivariate logistic analyses were used to identify the predictors and construct a predictive model, and receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves were programmed to evaluate the predictive efficacy. We enrolled 107 patients (44 patients with LNM and 63 patients without LNM). Among all variables, iodine concentration in the venous phase, extracellular volume, and tumor size were identified as independent predictors of LNM. The nomogram model, incorporating the two DLCT parameters and the morphological feature, achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.877 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.803-0.952) and 0.842 (95% CI: 0.707-0.977) for predicting LNM in the training and validation sets, respectively. Furthermore, the AUC of the nomogram model was greater than that of morphological features of lymph nodes in the training (AUC = 0.877 vs. 0.570) and validation (AUC = 0.842 vs. 0.583) sets. DLCT has the potential to predict LNM in patients with resectable PDAC and show a better predictive value than morphological features of lymph nodes. Question Morphological features of lymph nodes are of limited value in detecting metastatic lymph nodes in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Findings Dual-layer spectral computed tomography (DLCT) parameters and morphological features derived from PDAC lesions show good preoperatively predictive efficacy for lymph node metastasis. Clinical relevance The proposed DLCT-based nomogram model may serve as an effective and convenient tool for preoperatively predicting lymph node metastasis of resectable PDAC.

Neoadjuvant Treatment with Changes in Chemotherapy Regimens According to Carbohydrate Antigen 19-9 Level for Resectable/Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

The response of carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 to neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) may contribute to outcomes. This study aimed to investigate the effect of changes in NAT regimens based on CA19-9 level. This single-center retrospective study included patients with resectable/borderline resectable (R/BR)-PDAC undergoing NAT from 2008 to 2022. A CA19-9 level lower than 150 IU/mL after NAT was the criterion for resection. If the level did not decrease, the chemotherapy regimen was changed to satisfy the criterion. The patient cohort was divided into group A (satisfied criterion without changing chemotherapy), group B (did not receive chemotherapy change, could not satisfy the criterion), group C (received chemotherapy change, satisfied the criterion), and group D (received chemotherapy change, could not satisfy the criterion). The study cohort included 283 patients. After first-line chemotherapy, 112 (39.6%) patients did not satisfy the criterion (groups B [n = 64], C [n = 32], and D [n = 16]). Of the 283 patients, 48 (17%) received a chemotherapy change (groups C and D). The patients in groups C and D showed significantly better overall survival (OS, 35.9 months) than the group B patients (25.7 months) (P = 0.035). The OS of the group C patients (63.8 months) was similar to the OS of the group A patients (n = 171: 56.3 months; P = 0.430). Multivariate analysis of the patients in groups B, C, and D identified chemotherapy change as an independent prognostic factor for OS and progression-free survival. Changing the chemotherapy targeting the CA19-9 level can improve the outcome of R/BR-PDAC patients with poor biologic response to first-line NAT.

THE ROLE OF CA 19.9 IN PREDICTING THE OPERABILITY OF CARCINOMA PANCREAS

Objectives: Adenocarcinoma of the pancreas remains a relatively incurable disease despite advances in surgical care. Approximately 25% of patients will be found to have unresectable tumors during surgery even though computed tomography (CT) has demonstrated that they are resectable. There is a controversy regarding the use of cancer antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) to decide the resectability of pancreatic adenocarcinoma [1]. Our aim is to study the use of CA 19-9 in determining the operability of carcinoma pancreas [2]. Methods: This was a prospective study which included 69 patients and the study period was from December 2021 to December 2022. Data were collected from all patients with carcinoma of the pancreas who underwent surgical management. CA 19-9 levels were measured and recorded [3]. During surgery, the operative findings on resectability were documented and tabulated against corresponding CA 19-9 levels and contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) findings. Results: Of the 69 patients who were operated on, 38 patients had resectable tumors and underwent the Whipples procedure and 31 of them had non-resectable tumors and had to undergo palliative bypass procedures. Among the 31 patients whose tumors were non-resectable, only four were diagnosed non-resectable preoperatively with CECT, and the other 27 were found to be non-resectable only during surgery. That shows the relevance of this study. Of the 31 non-resectable cases, 14 (45.2%) patients had elevated CA 19-9 values of more than 501, and the rest 17 (54.8%) patients had low CA 19-9 values. Among the 38 resectable cases, 12 patients (31.6%) had elevated CA 19-9 more than 501, and 26 patients (68.4%) had low values. In conclusion, among non-resectable cases, 45.2% had raised CA 19-9, and among operable cases, 31.6% showed raised CA 19-9. Hence, CA 19-9 seems to be an insignificant predictor of tumor resectability [4]. Conclusion: It was found that the need for a pre-operative predictor for resectability of carcinoma pancreas is relevant while considering mortality and morbidity in operating carcinoma pancreas cases. On evaluating CA 19-9 as a pre-operative predictor, we found that CA 19-9 has no significant role as an indicator of local advancement or metastasis. Hence, we cannot consider CA 19-9 as a predictor of resectability of carcinoma pancreas preoperatively [5].

Prospective Comparison of [18F]FDG and [18F]AIF-FAPI-74 PET/CT in the Evaluation of Potentially Resectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

Accurate clinical staging of potentially resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is critical for establishing optimal treatment strategies. While the efficacy of fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose ([18F]FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in clinical staging is unclear, PET/CT detecting fibroblast-activation protein (FAP) expression has recently received considerable attention for detecting various tumors, including PDAC, with high sensitivity. We explored the efficacy of [18F]FDG and [18F]AIF-FAPI-74 PET/CT in the initial evaluation of potentially resectable PDAC. Between 2021 and 2022, twenty participants with newly diagnosed potentially resectable PDAC were enrolled. After the initial evaluation with pancreatic CT, [18F]FDG PET/CT, and [18F]AIF-FAPI-74 PET/CT, treatment strategies were determined considering the participant's general status, clinical staging, and resectability. Pathological information from the surgical specimens was only available in 17 participants who underwent curative-intent surgery. Head-to-head comparisons of quantitative radiotracer uptake and diagnostic performance were performed among imaging modalities. [18F]AIF-FAPI-74 PET/CT showed a significantly higher maximum standardized uptake value than [18F]FDG PET/CT did in evaluating primary pancreatic lesions (median [interquartile range]; 12.6 [10.7-13.7] vs. 6.3 [4.8-9.2]; P < 0.001). In contrast, [18F]AIF-FAPI-74 PET/CT showed a significantly lower mean standardized uptake value than [18F]FDG PET/CT did in evaluating background organ (median [interquartile range]) 0.8 [0.7-0.9] vs. 2.6 [2.3-2.7]; P < 0.001). In addition, the sensitivity of [18F]AIF-FAPI-74 PET/CT in detecting metastatic lymph nodes was higher than that of [18F]FDG PET/CT (50.0% vs. 0.0%; P = 0.026). This study demonstrated that [18F]AIF-FAPI-74 PET/CT could improve the clinical staging of potentially resectable PDAC.

Survival Analysis of Conversion Surgery in Borderline Resectable and Locally Advanced Unresectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Addressing Selection and Immortal Time Bias: A Retrospective Single-Center Study.

The purpose of this study was to provide a detailed evaluation of the oncological advantages of surgery following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for patients with borderline resectable (BR) or unresectable (UR) pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), with a focus on minimizing biases. Recently, NAC has become the standard care for BR or UR locally advanced (UR-LA) PDAC, however, many studies have assessed survival benefits and favorable variables without consideration for biases, particularly immortal time bias. This study included patients diagnosed with BR or UR-LA PDAC at Juntendo University Hospital from 2019 to 2022. To mitigate bias, we applied methods such as propensity score matching (PSM), time-dependent covariate Cox proportional hazard regression analysis (TDC), landmark analysis, and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression model. The study analyzed 124 patients, dividing them into a surgery group (n = 57) and a chemotherapy-only group (n = 67). After PSM, there were 21 matched pairs. Survival analysis using TDC analysis showed that the surgery group had significantly better overall survival compared with the chemotherapy-only group in both the entire cohort and the matched pairs. Cox regression analysis of the entire cohort also revealed a similar superiority of surgery, while the landmark analysis showed varying results depending on the landmark setting. After careful adjustment for selection and immortal time biases, surgery following NAC appears to significantly extend survival in patients with BR or UR PDAC.

Caveolin-1 expression is a predictor of survival and recurrence patterns in resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

Background/objectiveCaveolin-1 (Cav1) expressed in cancer cells (cCav1) or cancer-associated fibroblasts (fCav1) exerts either pro- or anti-tumorigenic effects depending on the cancer type or stage of cancer. We aimed to clarify the impact of cCav1 or fCav1 on survival, recurrence patterns, and efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). MethodsTissue microarrays were constructed including 615 patients who underwent curative resection for PDAC. Cav1 expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry. Patients were divided into two groups based on Cav1 expression in cancer cells (cCav1high vs. cCav1low) or cancer-associated fibroblasts (fCav1high vs. fCav1low). ResultsAmong all 615 patients, 40.7% were cCav1high and 72.7% were fCav1high. cCav1high was associated with worse overall survival (OS) (p = 0.001) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) (p = 0.001) than cCav1low, and was an independent prognostic factor in multivariate analysis of OS and RFS (OS: p = 0.001, hazard ratio [HR] 1.361; RFS: p = 0.001, HR 1.348). Among 596 patients with resectable/borderline resectable PDAC, cCav1high patients with NAC showed better OS than those without, while there was no significant difference between cCav1low patients with NAC and those without. cCav1high was associated with early recurrence (< 6 months) and liver metastasis after resection. Multivariate analysis revealed cCav1high as an independent predictor of liver metastasis. ConclusionscCav1high correlated with worse survival, early recurrence, and liver metastasis after resection for PDAC, while NAC improved survival in cCav1high patients. The Evaluation of cCav1 status could provide additional information contributing to the personalized management of PDAC.

Olaparib as maintenance therapy in non resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma associated with homologous recombination deficiency profile: A French retrospective multicentric AGEO real-world study

BackgroundPancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has a poor prognosis. The POLO trial showed that olaparib (PARP inhibitor) improved progression-free survival (PFS) but not overall survival (OS), when used as maintenance therapy after ≥ 16 weeks of disease control with first-line platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with germline (g) BRCA 1 or 2 pathogenic variants (PV) metastatic PDAC. However, real-world data on the effectiveness of olaparib are missing. MethodsPatients with unresectable PDAC associated with somatic (s) or (g)BRCA1/2 and (g)non-BRCA-HRD PV (i.e. other homologous recombination deficiency/HRD genes) who were treated with olaparib between 2020–2023 were included. The primary objective was to describe treatment patterns. Secondary exploratory objectives included OS and PFS in patients treated with olaparib according to the POLO trial or not, OS and PFS in patients with (g)HRD PV-associated PDAC versus (s)PVs, olaparib safety profile and factors associated with olaparib poor outcomes. ResultsAmong 85 patients, 45.9 % received olaparib as defined by the POLO trial. No difference in OS and PFS was observed between patients who received olaparib according to the POLO trial versus not. Patients with (g)HRD PV-associated PDAC had better OS compared to others (22.3 versus 10.5 months, p = 0.038). Factors associated with olaparib poor outcomes included a high neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and the use of olaparib outside the recommendations of the POLO trial. Few grade ≥ 3 adverse events were reported (9.4 %). ConclusionPatients with (g)HRD PV-associated PDAC had longer OS than those with (s)HRD PV. Olaparib use beyond the scope of the POLO trial was associated with poor outcomes.

Surgical Outcomes Following Neoadjuvant Treatment for Locally Advanced and Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

To assess overall survival (OS), compare the effects of neoadjuvant treatment, and describe surgical outcomes for patients undergoing pancreatic resection following chemotherapy and/or chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for borderline resectable (BR) or locally advanced (LA) pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). We approach BR/LA PDAC using chemotherapy followed by selective CRT to the primary site of disease where either the surgical margin remains radiologically threatened following chemotherapy or as a further downstaging treatment. Retrospective study of patients between December 2005 and June 2023 at the Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom. A total of 54 patients were included. The OS between R1 and R0 patients was significantly different: 7.5 versus 23 versus 42 versus 51 months for R1 chemo, R1 chemo and CRT, R0 chemo and R0 chemo, and CRT groups, respectively, P < 0.001. Similarly, 9 versus 18 versus 42 versus 41 months for N1 chemo, N1 chemo and CRT, N0 chemo and N0 chemo, and CRT groups, respectively, P = 0.0026. Multivariable Cox regression model demonstrated that perineural invasion (hazard ratio: 2.88, 95% confidence interval: 1.06-7.81; P = 0.038) and perivascular invasion (PVI) (HR: 2.76, 95% CI: 1.24-6.13; P = 0.013) were associated with significantly worse OS. Chemo and CRT conferred OS benefit compared to chemo only (7 vs 23 months, P = 0.004) in PVI-positive patients. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by CRT compared to chemotherapy alone for resected BD and LA PDAC was demonstrated to significantly improve median OS, in particular, in patients with R1 resection margins, ypN1 nodal status, and perivascular invasion.

Impact on survival of sarcopenia, systemic inflammatory response and anthropometric factors after pancreatectomy for resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma

IntroductionPancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is becoming a public health issue with a 5-years survival rate around 10%. Patients with PDAC are often sarcopenic, which impacts postoperative outcome. At the same time, overweight population is increasing and adipose tissue promotes tumor related-inflammation. With several studies supporting independently these data, we aimed to assess if they held an impact on survival when combined.MethodsWe included 232 patients from two university hospitals (CHU de Lille, Institut Paoli Calmette), from January 2011 to December 2018, who underwent Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for resectable PDAC. Preoperative CT scan was used to measure sarcopenia and visceral fat according to international cut-offs. Neutrophil to lymphocyte (NLR) and platelet to lymphocyte ratios (PLR) were used to measure inflammation. For univariate and multivariate analyses, the Cox proportional-hazard model was used. P-values below 0.05 were considered significant.ResultsSarcopenic patients with visceral obesity were less likely to survive than the others in multivariate analysis (OS, HR 1.65, p= 0.043). Cutaneous obesity did not influence survival. We also observed an influence on survival when we studied sarcopenia with visceral obesity (OS, p= 0.056; PFS, p = 0.014), sarcopenia with cutaneous obesity (PFS, p= 0.005) and sarcopenia with PLR (PFS, p= 0.043). This poor prognosis was also found in sarcopenic obese patients with high PLR (OS, p= 0.05; PFS, p= 0.01).ConclusionSarcopenic obesity was associated with poor prognosis after PD for PDAC, especially in patients with systemic inflammation. Pre operative management of these factors should be addressed in pancreatic cancer patients.

Neoadjuvant therapy versus upfront surgery in resectable pancreatic cancer: reconstructed patient-level meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Neoadjuvant treatment has shown promising results in patients with borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. The potential benefits of neoadjuvant treatment on long-term overall survival in patients with resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma have not yet been established. The aim of this study was to compare long-term overall survival of patients with resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma based on whether they received neoadjuvant treatment or underwent upfront surgery. A systematic review including randomized clinical trials on the overall survival outcomes between neoadjuvant treatment and upfront surgery in patients with resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma was conducted up to 1 August 2023 from PubMed, MEDLINE and Web of Science databases. Patient-level survival data was extracted and reconstructed from available Kaplan-Meier curves. A frequentist one-stage meta-analysis was employed, using Cox-based models and a non-parametric method (restricted mean survival time), to assess the difference in overall survival between groups. A Bayesian meta-analysis was also conducted. Five randomized clinical trials comprising 625 patients were included. Among patients with resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, neoadjuvant treatment was not significantly associated with a reduction in the hazard of death compared with upfront surgery (shared frailty HR 0.88, 95% c.i. 0.72 to 1.08, P = 0.223); this result was consistent in the non-parametric restricted mean survival time model (+2.41 months, 95% c.i. -1.22 to 6.04, P < 0.194), in the sensitivity analysis that excluded randomized clinical trials with a high risk of bias (shared frailty HR 0.91 (95% c.i. 0.72 to 1.15; P = 0.424)) and in the Bayesian analysis with a posterior shared frailty HR of 0.86 (95% c.i. 0.70 to 1.05). Neoadjuvant treatment does not demonstrate a survival advantage over upfront surgery for patients with resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Long-term lorazepam use may be associated with worse long-term outcomes among patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma

BackgroundLorazepam recently has been reported to alter the tumor microenvironment of pancreatic adenocarcinoma in a murine model. We sought to evaluate whether the use of lorazepam was associated with worse outcomes among patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. MethodsMedicare beneficiaries diagnosed with stage I-IV pancreatic adenocarcinoma between 2013 and 2019 were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results-Medicare database. The association of lorazepam prescription relative to overall survival and recurrence-free survival was examined. ResultsAmong 2,810 patients with stage I–III and 10,181 patients with stage IV pancreatic adenocarcinoma, a total of 133 (4.7%) and 444 individuals (4.4%) had a lorazepam prescription before disease diagnosis, respectively. Although the overall lorazepam group had comparable 5-year overall survival (15.0% vs 14.2%, P = .20) and recurrence-free survival (12.7% vs 10.9%, P = .42) with the no-lorazepam group after pancreatic adenocarcinoma resection, individuals with long-term lorazepam prescription (>30 days) had worse 5-year overall survival (9.0% vs 21.0%, P = .02) and recurrence-free survival (6.4% vs 17.1%, P = .009) compared with short-term lorazepam users (≤30 days). Similarly, among patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma, individuals with a long-term lorazepam prescription had worse 1-year overall survival (9.7% vs 15.9%, P = .02) compared with patients who had short-term lorazepam prescriptions. On multivariable analysis, long-term lorazepam prescription was independently associated with overall survival among patients with resectable (hazard ratio, 1.82; 95% confidence interval, 1.22–2.74) and metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (hazard ratio, 1.24; 95% confidence interval, 1.02–1.51). ConclusionLong-term lorazepam prescription was associated with worse long-term outcomes among patients who underwent resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma and patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma. These data support the need for further large scale studies to confirm a potential harmful effect of lorazepam among patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

The Role of CT-guided Core Needle Biopsy in Pancreatic Tumors: An Initial Evaluation in Modern Oncology.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy has recently become the standard of care for borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), and there have even been numerous reports evaluating its potential benefits in resectable PDAC. However, neoadjuvant therapy first requires a histological or cytological diagnosis. This study aimed to analyze the safety and diagnostic yield of CT-guided core needle biopsy (CNB). A retrospective analysis of patients with pancreatic tumor requiring a CNB during the period 2015 to 2023 were included. Biopsies were performed with an 18-20 G Tru-Core needle using a coaxial system and automatic biopsy gun. Demographics, procedural variables, postoperative outcomes, and histological results were analyzed. A total of 43 pancreatic biopsies were performed in 42 patients. The mean age was 60 years (35 to 81y), and 24 (56%) were males. Tumors were more frequently localized in the head (42%) and body (42%) of the pancreas. The mean size of the pancreatic lesions was 53.77 mm (17 to 181 mm) and the mean number of samples per biopsy was 4 (1 to 12). Most procedures were performed via direct access (81%). No major complications were observed. Histological diagnosis was obtained in 40 (93%) patients, with a sensitivity of 93%, specificity of 100% and an overall accuracy rate of 93%. The probability of performing a molecular diagnostic test increased with the year of biopsy (OR 3.34, 95% CI 1.33-8.40, P=0.01). CNB is an efficient and safe method for obtaining high-quality material. This approach could be essential as molecular profiling continues to improve the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of PDAC.

Relationships between postoperative recurrences and standardized uptake value on 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography in patients with resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma who underwent curative pancreatic resection after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy

BackgroundThis study aimed to examine postoperative recurrence after curative pancreatic resection following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) in patients with resectable (R-) and borderline resectable (BR-) pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), focusing on its relationship with the standardized uptake value (SUV) on 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET). MethodThe postoperative initial recurrence patterns were examined in patients with R- and BR-PDAC who underwent NACRT followed by curative pancreatic resection. Data collected from three prospective clinical trials were retrospectively analysed. ResultsAfter a median follow-up of 29 months, 91 (60 %) of 151 patients experienced postoperative recurrence. The median recurrence-free survival (RFS) for all patients was 18 months. The sites of first recurrence were lung-only in 24 (26 %) patients, liver-only in 23 (25 %), local-only in 11 (12 %), peritoneum-only in 10 (11 %), other single site in 5 (5 %), and multiple sites in 19 (21 %) patients. Multivariate analysis identified the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) on FDG-PET at diagnoses ≥5.40 (hazard ratio [HR], 1.62; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 1.01–2.61; p = 0.045) and node-positive pathology (HR, 2.01; 95 % CI, 1.32–3.08; p = 0.001) as significant predictors of RFS. Furthermore, the SUVmax at initial diagnosis and after NACRT correlated with liver metastasis. ConclusionR- and BR-PDACs with high SUV on FDG-PET at diagnosis are risk factors for postoperative recurrence. Among patients who undergo surgery after NACRT, those with a high SUVmax at diagnosis or post-NACRT require careful attention for postoperative liver recurrence.

New Biomarkers to Define A Biological Borderline Situation for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma - Results of An Ancillary Study of the PANACHE01-PRODIGE48 Trial.

To investigate in patients treated for a resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PA), the prognostic value of baseline CA19-9 and circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) for overall survival (OS), to improve death risk stratification, based on a planned ancillary study from PANACHE01-PRODIGE 48 trial. Biological borderline situation that was first used by the MD Anderson, became a standard practice following the international consensus conference in 2016 to manage PA. Regarding the risk of systemic disease especially in the setting of "markedly elevated" CA19-9, neoadjuvant therapy is advised to avoid unnecessary surgery, with risk of early recurrence. To best define biological borderline situations, new biomarkers are needed. Characteristics at diagnosis and OS were compared between patients with or without ctDNA status available. OS was estimated with Kaplan Meier method and compared with log-rank test. Restricted cubic spline approach was used to identify optimal threshold for biological parameters for death risk stratification. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models were estimated to assess the association of ctDNA status and other parameters with OS. Among the 132 patients from the primary population for analysis in the PANACHE01 -PRODIGE 48 trial, 92(71%) were available for ctDNA status at diagnosis. No selection bias was identified between patients with or without ctDNA status. 14 patients (15%) were ctDNA+ and exhibited a higher risk for death (P=0,0188; HR95% CI: 2.28 (1.12-4.63). In the 92 patients with ctDNA status available among the others parameter analysed only CA19-9 was statically associated with OS in univariate analysis. Patients with log of CA19-9 equal or superior to 4.4 that corresponds to a CA19-9 of 80 UI/mL were identified at higher risk for death (P=0,0143; HR95% CI: 2.2 (1.15-4.19). In multivariate analysis CA19-19 remained independently associated with OS (p-value=0.0323). When combining the two biomarkers, median OS was of 19.4 (IC 95% 3.8-Not reached) months, 30.2 (IC 95% 17.1-NR) months and not reached (IC 95% 39.3-NR) for "CA19-9 high and ctDNA+ group", "CA19-9 high or ctDNA+ group", and "CA19-9 low and ctDNA- group", respectively (logrank P=0,0069). Progress in the management of potentially operable PA remains limited, relying solely on strategies to optimize the sequence of complete treatment, based on modern multidrug chemotherapy (FOLFIRINOX, GemNabPaclitaxel) and surgical resection. The identification of risk criteria, such as the existence of systemic disease, is an important issue, currently referred to as "biologic borderline disease". Few data, particularly from prospective studies, allow us to identify biomarkers other than CA19-9. Combining ctDNA to CA19-9 could be of interest to best define biological borderline situations in PA.

Recurrence pattern and its risk factors in patients with resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma – A retrospective analysis of 272 patients

BackgroundThe aim of this study was to investigate the patterns of recurrence and their associated risk factors in patients who underwent resection for pancreatic carcinoma. MethodsThis retrospective study included 272 patients, who underwent Ro/R1-resection of PDAC from 2005 to 2020 at the University Hospital Erlangen. Risk factors for different recurrence patterns and the prognostic value of recurrence pattern on the overall survival after recurrence were evaluated. Results61 % of the patients experienced recurrence, mostly within the first 12 postoperative months (62 %) and in the form of metastases (87 %). The median overall survival from recurrence was 9.2 months. The preoperative absence of diabetes and the presence of lymph node metastasis were independent risk factors for recurrence and a preoperative CA19-9 exceeding 97 U/ml for early recurrence. Additionally, lymph node metastases were associated with a higher risk of metastatic recurrence. Early recurrence, but not the site of recurrence, was identified as an independent prognostic factor for worse overall survival from recurrence. ConclusionThe occurrence of recurrence and especially of early and metastatic recurrence are associated with a worse overall survival. Patients lacking preoperative diabetes, having high preoperative CA19-9 values and lymph node metastases are particularly at risk for (early) recurrence.

Preoperative level of serum transthyretin as a novel biomarker predicting survival in resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with neoadjuvant therapy

BackgroundSystemic inflammation and altered metabolism are essential hallmarks of cancer. We hypothesized that the rapid turnover protein transthyretin (TTR) (half-life: 2–3 days), compared with the conventional marker albumin (21 days), better reflects the inflammatory/metabolic dynamics of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) after neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) and is a useful prognostic marker. MethodsSerum TTR and albumin levels were measured in 104 consecutive post-NAT PDAC patients before curative resection. The associations of preoperative TTR and albumin levels with overall survival (OS) after pancreatectomy were retrospectively analyzed. ResultsThe mean (SD) TTR and albumin levels were 21.6 (6.4) mg/dL (normal range: ≥22.0 mg/dL) and 3.9 (0.55) g/dL. A low (<22.0 mg/dL) post-NAT TTR level was associated with an advanced tumor stage and higher CEA and CRP levels. Patients with low TTR levels showed significantly worse OS compared with normal levels (3-year OS 39 % vs. 54 %, P = 0.037), although albumin levels did not. We modified prognostic biomarkers of systemic inflammation/metabolism, such as GPS, PNI, and CONUT scores, using the serum TTR instead of albumin level and successfully showed that modified scores were better associated with OS compared with original scores using serum albumin level. ConclusionsOur data suggest that the TTR level is a promising prognostic biomarker for PDAC patients after NAT.

Futility of Up-Front Resection for Anatomically Resectable Pancreatic Cancer

There are currently no clinically relevant criteria to predict a futile up-front pancreatectomy in patients with anatomically resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. To develop a futility risk model using a multi-institutional database and provide unified criteria associated with a futility likelihood below a safety threshold of 20%. This retrospective study took place from January 2010 through December 2021 at 5 high- or very high-volume centers in Italy. Data were analyzed during April 2024. Participants included consecutive patients undergoing up-front pancreatectomy at the participating institutions. Standard management, per existing guidelines. The main outcome measure was the rate of futile pancreatectomy, defined as an operation resulting in patient death or disease recurrence within 6 months. Dichotomous criteria were constructed to maintain the futility likelihood below 20%, corresponding to the chance of not receiving postneoadjuvant resection from existing pooled data. This study included 1426 patients. The median age was 69 (interquartile range, 62-75) years, 759 patients were male (53.2%), and 1076 had head cancer (75.4%). The rate of adjuvant treatment receipt was 73.7%. For the model construction, the study sample was split into a derivation (n = 885) and a validation cohort (n = 541). The rate of futile pancreatectomy was 18.9% (19.2% in the development and 18.6% in the validation cohort). Preoperative variables associated with futile resection were American Society of Anesthesiologists class (95% CI for coefficients, 0.68-0.87), cancer antigen (CA) 19.9 serum levels (95% CI, for coefficients 0.05-0.75), and tumor size (95% CI for coefficients, 0.28-0.46). Three risk groups associated with an escalating likelihood of futile resection, worse pathological features, and worse outcomes were identified. Four discrete conditions (defined as CA 19.9 levels-adjusted-to-size criteria: tumor size less than 2 cm with CA 19.9 levels less than 1000 U/mL; tumor size less than 3 cm with CA 19.9 levels less than 500 U/mL; tumor size less than 4 cm with CA 19.9 levels less than 150 U/mL; and tumor size less than 5 cm with CA 19.9 levels less than 50 U/mL) were associated with a futility likelihood below 20%. Both disease-free survival and overall survival were significantly longer in patients fulfilling the criteria. In this study, a preoperative model (MetroPancreas) and dichotomous criteria to determine the risk of futile pancreatectomy were developed. This might help in selecting patients for up-front resection or neoadjuvant therapy.