The strength of the tourism academic field is arguably its capacity to facilitate investigations thatspan business as well as the physical and social sciences. While this does not mean that disciplinesare irrelevant in tourism, it has been argued that an inter-disciplinary scholarship could lead topost-disciplinary contributions—perspectives that are more problem-focused, based on more flexiblemodes of knowledgeproduction,plurality, synthesis and greater synergy (Coles,Hall, & Duval, 2006, p.293). We situate this note within this fluid, inter-disciplinary context, with the intent to criticallyreview the recent conceptual development of hopeful tourism, and citizen science—a scientific fieldin which ordinary citizens collect data for scientific purposes and greater public good (Dickinson &Bonney, 2012). We suggest there are conceptual similarities between the social science of hopefultourism and citizen science and argue that the similarities between the two fields could lead tocommon research agendas.Hopeful tourism has emerged as a transformative perspective for tourism knowledge production(Pritchard, Morgan, & Ateljevic, 2011). Its advocates claim that hopeful tourism is characterised byhumanist, value-led scholarship, ethics and respect for human dignity. It is based on a transactional,subjectivist, value-mediated epistemology where the nature of knowledge is characterised byco-transformative learnings (Pritchard et al., 2011). The hopeful tourism research agenda currentlyfocuses on topics such as: public good, harmony and balance, aesthetics and beauty, mindful develop-ment, values and ethics, neglected ways of knowing, under-served emancipatory worlds, and so on.This agenda has recently been criticized by some scholars who suggest that hopeful tourism doesnot go far enough in making sure that its research really ‘‘interrogates tourism’s role in oppression’’(Higgins-Desbiolles & Whyte, 2013, p.22). The critics argue: ‘‘We challenge all critical tourism scholarsto engage in research methodologies that go beyond hope. We live under grave threats as people ofpower and privilege assert the right to usurp remaining finite resources leaving the majority to
Read full abstract