Rescue Analgesia In Group Research Articles

A comparative evaluation of 0.25% bupivacaine and 0.25% levobupivacaine in peritubal infiltration in percutaneous nephrolithotomy

Background: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is a routine endourologic procedure in patients with renal calculi. Although it is less painful than open surgery, pain around the nephrostomy tube is a clinical problem; therefore, good post-operative analgesia is required to alleviate pain. Peritubal infiltration can be one of the choices to alleviate pain around the nephrostomy tube. Aims and Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of peritubal infiltration of local anesthetics for post-operative pain following PCNL. Materials and Methods: A total of 60 patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists Grade I/II scheduled for elective PCNL surgeries were randomly allocated into two groups. Group L received levobupivacaine 0.25% (30 mL) and Group B received bupivacaine 0.25% (30 mL). The duration of rescue analgesia, total dose of tramadol consumption in 24 h, hemodynamic parameters, and adverse events during the post-operative period were noted. Results: The mean duration of rescue analgesia in Group L was 274.50±24.89 min and in Group B was 275.33±23.04 min which was not significant (P>0.05). Conclusion: Peritubal infiltration of 0.25% levobupivacaine and 0.25% bupivacaine is efficient in alleviating post-operative pain after PCNL. Both drugs can be used for infiltration around nephrostomy tubes in PCNL surgeries safely and are associated with minimal side effects.

Pain Management Following Intracavitary Brachytherapy Procedures: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Study.

Background and objectives Intracavitary applicators are a source of significant discomfort after brachytherapy procedures while undergoing subsequent radiation treatment. With strides towards opioid-sparing anesthesia and analgesia, it's essential to find appropriate substitutes. This procedure requires adequate relaxation of pelvic muscles during the procedure and proper analgesia after the procedure, with the presence of intracavitary applicators, needed for radiation treatment. We studied the day-case safety and analgesic efficacy of adjuvants dexmedetomidine 3 µg and fentanyl 15 µg intrathecally to low-dose 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine. Methods Seventy females scheduled for brachytherapy procedures were randomly allocated to receive either Group I (0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine (1.8 ml) plus 3µg dexmedetomidine (0.3ml)) or Group II (0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine (1.8 ml) plus 15µg fentanyl (0.3ml)). The primary outcome was to assess and compare the brachytherapy (day-case) feasibility with 3µg dexmedetomidine and 15µg fentanyl (time taken to meet hospital discharge criteria). The secondary outcomes were the absolute duration of spinal analgesia, pain scores, patient satisfaction scores, and any associated adverse events. Data analysis was done using IBM SPSS software for Windows, version 21.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). Results All patients in Group I were discharged on the same day without any adverse effects. They underwent an intracavitary brachytherapy procedure under spinal anesthesia with stable hemodynamics successfully. The mean time taken to meet hospital discharge criteria in Group II was shorter than in Group I (258.43 ± 27.460 vs. 335.71 ± 21.114). The mean absolute duration of spinal analgesia was significantly longer in Group I as compared to Group II (406.82 ± 51.78 mins vs. 267 ± 16.23 mins) (p<.001). Seventeen patients required rescue analgesia in Group II versus eight in Group I (p<0.025). Conclusion Patients in both groups received excellent analgesia with enhanced patient satisfaction. Three µg intrathecal dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to low-dose hyperbaric bupivacaine can be used safely in day-case brachytherapy procedures. It provides adequate anesthesia and prolonged spinal analgesia as compared to 15 µg fentanyl.

Comparative Study of Ropivacaine and Ropivacaine With Dexmedetomidine in Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) Block for Post-operative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Cesarean Sections.

Background Adequate post-operative analgesia in the obstetric patient is necessary to facilitate breastfeeding and the care of the newborn. Considering the limitations of intravenous analgesic options such as non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and opioids, other alternatives have been tried for offering better analgesia with fewer potential side effects. Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block is one such option that has been tried with various local anesthetic drugs, either alone or in combination with other adjuvants. The addition of dexmedetomidine to bupivacaine in TAP block has been shown to prolong the duration of post-operative analgesia when compared to local anesthetic alone. This study was conducted to determine the efficacy of dexmedetomidine, as an adjuvant to ropivacaine, when administered in TAP block in patients undergoing cesarean section. Methodology The study was a prospective, randomized, parallel assignment, triple-blinded controlled trial. Hundred patients posted for elective lower segment cesarean section, fulfilling the inclusion criteria, were randomly divided into two equal groups, group R and group RD, comprising 50 patients each. Patients in group R were administered bilateral TAP block by landmark technique using ropivacaine alone, whereas patients in group RD were administered TAP block with dexmedetomidine 1 micrograms/kg, in addition to a similar dose of ropivacaine. Mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), visual analog scale (VAS)-R (pain score on VAS scale at rest), VAS-C (pain score on VAS scale on coughing), nausea and vomiting, and Ramsay sedation score were recorded on admission to post-operative care unit (PACU), and at first, fourth, eighth, 12th, 18th,and 24th hours post-operatively. Rescue analgesia was provided with intravenous morphine. Short Assessment of Patient Satisfaction Score (SAPS) was noted on a five-point scale after 24 hours based on patient satisfaction regarding the quality of post-operative analgesia. Results While there was no significant difference between groups R and RD with respect to VAS-C and VAS-R immediately after shifting and at the first, fourth, and eighth hours, a significant difference was observed at the 12th and 18th hours post-operatively. After 24 hours, no significant difference was observed between groups R and RD with respect to VAS-C and VAS-R. While 50% of patients needed rescue analgesia in group R, only 28% of patients needed rescue analgesia in group RD. There was significantly better patient satisfaction measured by the Short Assessment of Patient Satisfaction Score (SAPS) with respect to the quality of analgesia in patients in group RD as compared to those in group R. Conclusions The addition of dexmedetomidine to ropivacaine increased the duration of post-operative analgesia up to 18 hours post-operatively in cases of elective lower segment cesarean section. Also, the quality of post-operative analgesia is better in such patients, as shown by a significant difference in patient satisfaction scores between the two groups.

Comparison of Intrathecal Morphine Versus Erector Spinae Plane Block for Perioperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Randomized Control Trial.

Lumbar spine surgery is associated with a significant degree of moderate-to-severe perioperative pain which can be alleviated by using different pain-relieving modalities; of these, erector spinae plane block and intrathecal morphine have promise. To compare the analgesic efficacy between intrathecal morphine (ITM) versus erector spinae plane block (ESPB) for perioperative analgesia in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery. A total of 74 patients aged between 20 and 65 years of either sex were posted for elective lumbar spine surgery. Patients were divided into two groups: Group A patients received 0.3 mg intrathecal morphine andGroup B received bilateral erector spinae plane block at L3 level by using 30 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine before starting the surgery for perioperative analgesia. In the perioperative period, pain was assessed by hemodynamic parameters (heart rate and mean arterial pressure), numeric rating scale (NRS), and patient satisfaction score. Result: The difference in heart rate and mean arterial pressure was found to be statistically significant between groups at three, six, 12, and 24 hours (p<0.05). The patients who required rescue analgesia in Group A and Group B were 23 (62.2%) and 37 (100%) patients in the first 24 hours. The rate of complication was higher in Group A than in Group B (45% vs 5.4%). The patient satisfaction score was found to be better in Group A than in Group B. Intrathecal morphineprovides more substantial and extended analgesia up to 48 hours postoperatively as compared to erector spinae plane block.

Comparison of ultrasound-guided paravertebral block versus erector spinae plane block for postoperative analgesia after percutaneous nephrolithotomy - A randomised, double-blind, controlled study.

Paravertebral block (PVB) is the regional anaesthesia of choice for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is also effective for the same. This study aims to compare the analgesic efficacy and ease of performing PVB or ESPB for PCNL surgery. This study was conducted in 60 patients undergoing PCNL, who were randomised to Group P (n = 30; received ultrasound-guided [USG] PVB) and Group E (n = 30; received USG ESPB) after general anaesthesia. Blocks were administered at T10 level on the side of the surgery using 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine. The trachea was extubated at the end of surgery. The primary outcome was analgesia duration, and secondary outcomes were postoperative pain scores, analgesic consumption, ease of block performance, time taken to perform the block and complications between the two groups. Continuous variables were compared using an independent sample t-test, and categorical variables were analysed using Pearson's Chi-square test. Demographic variables were comparable in both groups. The mean (standard deviation [SD]) time of first rescue analgesia in Group P and Group E were 16.6 (20.4)(95% confidence interval [CI]: 9.02-20.32) h and 16.3 (21.8) (95% CI: 8.17-24.51) h, respectively (P = 0.95). The postoperative pain scores and number of doses of analgesics used were comparable between the groups (P > 0.05). The time taken to perform PVB was much longer compared to the time taken to perform ESPB (P = 0.01). USG PVB and ESPB were equally effective for postoperative analgesia for PCNL surgery.

Evaluation of adding magnesium sulphate to intrathecal bupivacaine in lower limb orthopedic surgery

BackgroundA subarachnoid block is the cheaper and widely used regional block for lower limb surgery. Postoperative pain occurs after lower limb orthopedic surgery from moderate to severe. We conducted a prospective, randomized, double-blind controlled trial. All patients were assessed for onset and duration of sensory and motor block, total duration of analgesia, and postoperative pain relief.This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of intrathecal bupivacaine with magnesium undergoing lower limb orthopedic surgery.ResultsOne hundred patients were randomly divided into two equal groups. Group M: Intrathecal 3 ml (15 mg) of 0.5% bupivacaine + 0.2 ml (50 mg) of preservative-free 25% of magnesium sulphate. Group B: Intrathecal 3 ml (15 mg) of 0.5% bupivacaine + 0.2 ml preservative-free 0.9% normal saline. The mean time that occurred for the sensory blockade at T10 was 2.49 ± 0.49 min in group B, while it was 4.13 ± 0.74 min in group BM (p value < 0.0001). The mean of the total duration of the sensory block in group B was 139.5 ± 32.01 min, while it was 366.4 ± 30.12 min in group BM (p value < 0.0001). The time taken for the onset of motor block in group B was 5.28 ± 1.31 min, while it was 7.86 ± 1.19 min in group BM (p value < 0.0001). The mean total duration of the motor block in group B was 136.3 ± 8.19 min, while it was 336.5 ± 37.08 min in group BM (p value < 0.0001). The total duration of analgesia in group B was 141.4 ± 14.85 min, while it was 365.9 ± 44.91 min in group BM (p value < 0.0001). The mean dose required for rescue analgesia in group B was 2.2 ± 1.14, while in group BM was 1.28 ± 0.96 (p value < 0.0001).ConclusionsThe addition of 50 mg magnesium sulphate in intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine significantly prolongs the extended duration of sensory, motor blockade, and total duration of analgesia for patients undergoing lower limb orthopedic surgery.

Comparing anesthesia modes in major burns: Total intravenous anesthesia versus general anesthesia - A cross-sectional study in a Central Indian government hospital

Background: Burn injuries remain a significant public health concern, causing complex trauma. Early excision and skin grafting are standard in burn management to reduce infection and scarring. The choice of anesthesia is critical for optimal pain control and hemodynamic stability. Aims and Objectives: This study aims to compare total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) and general anesthesia (GA) in patients of major burns. Materials and Methods: The study was conducted in the Department of Anaesthesia, M.G.M. Medical College and M.Y. Hospital, Indore, over a period of 12 months. One hundred and twenty patients with 10–12% total burn area were included and randomized into two groups of 60 patients each. Group T patients received TIVA and Group G patients received GA. Results: Both the groups were comparable with respect to age, gender, and baseline vitals. The mean heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and mean MAP were significantly higher in Group G at 0, 30, and 60 min. In Group T, all patients achieved an Aldrete score of 9 or more within 10 min. Pain was more prevalent in Group G patients, and the comparison was found to be statistically significant. The mean time to first rescue analgesia in Group T was later than Group G, and the difference was found to be statistically significant. Conclusion: From the results, we may conclude that TIVA provides superior hemodynamic stability, shorter post-anesthesia unit recovery time, and improved analgesia compared to GA. However, there are lacunae in the literature, hence we recommend that larger studies comparing these two anesthesia modes be conducted before generalizing the present findings to the general population.

Effect of preemptive ultrasound-guided TAP block on intraoperative analgesic requirements in patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecological surgeries under general anesthesia: A prospective, randomized controlled study

Background: Pain could lead to an increased consumption of opioids intraoperatively as well as postoperatively with subsequent side effects and prolonged post-operative recovery. Transverse abdominus plain (TAP) block is commonly used for post-operative analgesia. We wanted to study the effect of TAP block, when given as pre-emtive analgesia. Aims and Objectives: The study was conducted to ascertain the benefit TAP block when given before surgical incision. The primary objective was to study the intraoperative fentanyl requirement in patients undergoing Laparoscopic gynecological surgeries. The secondary objectives was to analyze the Intra-operative hemodynamic parameters, time needed to extubate the patient, sedation score, visual analog scale (VAS) scores, and the time of first rescue analgesia. Materials and Methods: Sixty-two eligible female patients posted for total laproscopic hysterectomy or Laproscopic-assisted Vaginal Hysterectomy coming were divided into two groups. Group A – Standard General Anaesthesia with pre-operative TAP block. Group B- Standard General Anaesthesia. Whenever there was 15% rise in heart rate (HR) or mean blood pressure (MBP) above the baseline, 20 mcg bolus of fentanyl was given. Total intra-operative Fentanyl consumption, intraoperative HR and MBP, time needed to extubate, post-operative sedation, VAS score, and time of first rescue analgesia was noted. Results: There was no difference in the demographic profile between two groups. The mean intraoperative fentanyl required was significantly higher in Group B (140.33±12.17 mcg) than in Group A (101.33±5.07 mcg). HR and MBP were lower in Group A throughout the procedure. The mean time of extubation was 5.4 min and 15.77 min in Group A and B. The mean sedation score observed was significantly higher up to 30 min in Group B. Mean Time of first rescue analgesia in Group A was 452.90±110.46 min and Group B was 240±89.13 min. Conclusion: Pre-operative TAP block given in laparoscopic gynecological surgeries decreases intraoperative fentanyl consumption leading to early extubation and causes less sedation in early post-operative period.

POST OPERATIVE ANALGESIC EFFECT OF INTRATHECAL FENTANYL AS AN ADJUVANT TO 0.5% HYPERBARIC BUPIVACAINE COMPARED TO 0.5% HYPERBARIC BUPIVACAINE IN SUBARACHNOID BLOCK IN LOWER LIMB ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERIES: AN OBSERVATIONAL STUDY.

Background: Pain is an unkind sensory and sensitive practice associated with actual or potential tissue damage and also is associated with uncomfortable sensations in body. Postoperative pain management holds the key aspect of postoperative care. In this study, we have compared the intrathecal 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine with intrathecal fentanyl as adjuvant to 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine in terms of safety, efcacy, and postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing lower limb orthopaedic surgeries and also studied the side effects of the drugs used. An Material: analytical, prospective, observational study was conducted in Department of anaesthesia of a tertiary care teaching hospital. All adult patients eligible by the mentioned inclusion and exclusion criteria were considered as sample who were observed and analysed. Total 112 patients were included in the study, which were divided in two equal groups. Group I (BF)- Patients who received 3 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine and 25 μg of fentanyl intrathecally. Group II (B)- Patients who received 3 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine and 0.5 ml of CSF intrathecally. In Results: present study there was no statistical signicant difference in mean age, sex, weight, and ASA grade between two groups. In the study there was statistically signicant difference in mean VAS score between two groups at post op 3rd hrs,4th and 5th hrs. At these intervals mean VAS score was high in group II compared to group I. Mean time of First Rescue Analgesia in group I was 4.85 ± 0.47 hrs and in group II was 3.5 ± 0.53 hrs which highly statistically signicant. There was no statistical signicant difference in side effects amongst the two groups. There was statistically signicant difference in mean HR between two groups at post op 4th and 5th hr. Mean HR was high in group II compared to group I at these two intervals. In the study there was no statistically signicant difference in mean SBP, DBP and MAP between two groups from baseline to post op 6 hrs. Present study concluded that addition of 25 μg fentanyl to intrathecal bupivacai Conclusion: ne offers longer duration of postoperative analgesia. So, it has suggested that fentanyl is a better choice with regards to postoperative analgesia in lower limb orthopaedic surgeries.

The Role of Ultrasound-Guided Multipoint Fascial Plane Block in ElderlyPatients Undergoing Combined Thoracoscopic-Laparoscopic Esophagectomy: A Prospective Randomized Study.

We estimated the safety and efficacy of ultrasound-guided multipoint fascial plane block, including serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) and bilateral transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB) in elderly patients who underwent combined thoracoscopic-laparoscopic esophagectomy (TLE). The authors enrolled 80 patients in this prospective study after patient selection using the inclusion and exclusion criteria who were scheduled for elective TLE from May 2020 to May 2021. Patients were randomly assigned to the treated group (group N) or the control group (group C) (n = 40 per group) using the sealed-envelope method. Multipoint fascial plane blocks, including serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) and bilateral TAPB, were performed on patients undergoing TLE using a solution of 60mL 0.375% ropivacaine plus 2.5mg dexamethasone by 3 injections of 20mL each (group N) or no interventions (group C). Systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and heart rate (HR) at T incision and 30min after T incision were significantly higher in group C than in group N, and also significantly higher than at baseline (P < 0.01). Blood glucose at 60min, 2h after T incision, was significantly higher in group C than in group N and significantly higher than at baseline (P < 0.01). Compared to group N, the dosages of propofol and remifentanil used during surgery in group C were more than those in group N (P < 0.01). The time to first rescue analgesic in group C was earlier than in group N. The total postoperative use of sufentanil, and the number of patients requiring rescue analgesics in group C, were more than in group N (P < 0.01). This study showed that applying the multipoint fascia pane block technique in TLE for elderly patients could significantly reduce postoperative pain, decrease the dosages of drugs used in general anesthesia, improve the quality of the awakening, and have no obvious adverse reactions. Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR-2000033617).

Intrathecal Buprenorphine versus Intrathecal Fentanyl as Adjuvants to Hyperbaric Bupivacaine in Spinal Anaesthesia for Lower Segment Caesarean Sections: A Randomised Clinical Study

Introduction: Spinal anaesthesia is the choice technique for Lower Segment Caesarean Section (LSCS). When using subarachnoid block (spinal analgesia), opioids are employed as the main adjuvants along with local anaesthetics to achieve intra/postoperative analgesia. These opioids have desirable properties such as reducing the dose of local anaesthetics, minimising side-effects, providing analgesia, and prolonging the duration of anaesthesia. Aim: To evaluate and compare the efficacy between intrathecal Buprenorphine and Fentanyl as adjuvants to hyperbaric bupivacaine (0.5%) in women undergoing LSCS under spinal anaesthesia. Materials and Methods: A randomised double-blinded clinical trial was conducted at Bharati Vidyapeeth Hospital and Research Centre in Pune, Maharashtra, India between July 2021 and February 2022. A total of 80 parturients with American Society of Anaesthesilogists (ASA) grade II, aged 18 and older, scheduled for elective LSCS, were randomly divided into two groups of 40 each. Group B received 1.8 mL of 0.5% Bupivacaine with 60 μg Buprenorphine, while Group F received 1.8 mL of 0.5% Bupivacaine with 25 μg Fentanyl. The onset/duration of motor block and sensory block, intraoperative haemodynamics, sideeffects, postoperative pain, and demand for the first rescue analgesia were assessed using Chi-square test, Fisher’s-exact probability test, or independent sample t-test. Results: Demographic data such as age, weight, Body Mass Index (BMI), and ASA grade were similar in both groups. The mean duration of surgery in Group B and Group F was 48.12±6.86 min and 48.25±6.56 min, respectively. The mean duration of sensory blockade in Group B was 264.38±37.16 min, and in Group F it was 193.50±34.27 min. The total duration of motor block was 231.00±43.74 minutes in Group B and 171.00±36.87 min in Group F. The total duration of sensory and motor block in Group B was significantly longer (p-value &lt;0.05). The mean time to first rescue analgesia in Group B and Group F was 304.63 min and 228.63 min, respectively (p-value &lt;0.05). Conclusion: The present study concluded that both drugs are safe and suitable as adjuvants with local anaesthetics in spinal anaesthesia for LSCS. The addition of intrathecal buprenorphine to bupivacaine provides a more promising postoperative analgesic effect compared to intrathecal fentanyl, without causing any significant maternal or neonatal side-effects.

Efficacy of Ultrasound Guided Single Level Paravertebral Block vs Transmuscular Quadratus Lumborum Block (III) for Postoperative Analgesia after Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Surgeries- A Randomised Clinical Study

Introduction: Pain control forms an essential component of enhanced recovery after surgery. Regional nerve blocks forms the mainstay of pain relief now-a-days. Pain after Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL) surgeries is always distressing to the patient due to injury to the renal capsule. Aim: To compare the efficacy of Ultrasound (USG) guided Paravertebral Block (PVB) versus Quadratus Lumborum Block (QLB) for postoperative analgesia following PCNL surgeries. Materials and Methods: This randomised clinical study was done between February 2021 to August 2022 at Narayana Medical College and Hospitals, Nellore, Andhra Pradesh, India. Sixty patients of American Society of Anaesthesiology (ASA) I and II between 30-60 years age group undergoing PCNL surgeries were divided into two groups. Group P received USG guided PVB at T9-T10 level with 20 mL of 0.25% Levobupivacaine with 8 mg Dexamethasone whereas group Q received QLB (III) with 20 mL of 0.25% Levobupivacaine with 8 mg Dexamethasone. Visual Analogue Score (VAS), time for first rescue analgesic and number of patients requiring rescue analgesic in first 24 hours were measured. unpaired t-test was used to compare continuous variables whereas the Chi-square test was to compare the categorical variables. Results: There was no statistical difference in terms of sex, age, weight, height or ASA grade (p&gt;0.05). The mean time required for rescue analgesia in group P was around 478 minutes compared to group Q with 346 minutes which was statistically significant (p=0.001). Mean tramadol consumption in group Q was significantly high (155 mg) compared to group P (125 mg). VAS was significantly better in group P. Conclusion: USG guided single level PVB provides superior analgesia compared to transmuscular QLB for postoperative analgesia after PCNL surgeries which helps in enhanced recovery after surgery.

Spermatic cord block in open inguinal hernioplasty

Background: Spermatic cord block is a useful technique for providing anesthesia with scrotal pain and it has been described and published in the urology and anesthesia literature for more than 40 years. Spermatic cord block for inguinal hernioplasty along with spinal anaesthesia avoids the potential risks of neuraxial and general anesthesia and provides long-lasting postoperative analgesia. The aim of this study is to evaluate the postoperative effect of 0.5% Bupivacaine for spermatic cord block along with spinal anaesthesia in inguinal hernioplasty.Methods: This study was carried out in KPC medical college and hospital on 100 patients with ASA physical status I and II, age older than or equal to 18 years undergoing elective open inguinal hernioplasty from September 2021 to August 2022. Patients were randomly allocated into two equal groups: 50 patients received spermatic cord block after mesh placement by bupivacaine 5 ml (0.5%), and 1 ml normal saline (group 1), and 50 patients received 6 ml saline injection in spermatic cord.Results: There was no significant difference between the demographic data, patient characteristics, heart rate, mean arterial blood pressure, and oxygen saturation in the studied groups. There was significantly rapid onset and prolonged duration of blockade, significant decrease in visual analog scale score at 6 h and 12 h postoperatively and the amount of rescue analgesia in group 1 respectively.Conclusions: Spermatic cord block in inguinal hernioplasty surgery improves onset of the block, prolongs postoperative analgesia and reduces the consumption of of postoperative rescue analgesics.

Erector spinae plane block for postoperative analgesia following percutaneous nephrolithotomy under spinal anaesthesia- A randomised controlled study.

Postoperative pain is a multitude of various irksome sensory, emotional and mental experiences aggravated by surgical trauma and associated with autonomic, endocrine, metabolic, physiological and behavioural responses. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of erector spinae plane block (ESPB) in postoperative analgesia following percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) under spinal anaesthesia. This prospective randomised study was conducted on sixty American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I and II patients scheduled for PCNL under spinal anaesthesia. They were randomised into two equal groups of thirty patients. ESPB was given in group A with 20 ml of injection bupivacaine 0.25% and dexamethasone 8 mg and group B received injection tramadol 1.5 mg/kg intravenously immediately after PCNL. The primary outcome was comparison of visual analogue scale (VAS) score in the first 24 h postoperatively, whereas secondary objectives included hemodynamic variables and requirement of rescue analgesia. VAS score in group A (ESPB) with mean of 3.15 ± 0.68 was comparatively low when compared to group B with mean of 6.61 ± 0.50 at 6 hours. After 4 h postoperatively, VAS scores continued to be higher and significant number of patients required rescue analgesia in group B. ESPB reduced VAS score, provided adequate postoperative analgesia, with similar haemodynamic changes and adverse effects in comparison to the conventional analgesia with tramadol in PCNL.

To compare the efficacy of Gabapentin with Paracetamol for Preemptive Analgesia in children undergoing Tonsillectomy.

Aim: To compare the mean time for first rescue analgesia after preemptive gabapentin versus paracetamol for pain control after tonsillectomy in children. Method: This random controlled trial was conducted by Anesthesia team in ENT OT in Jinnah Hospital, Lahore from January 1, 2018 to June 30, 2018. After taking informed consent, 60 patients fulfilling the selection criteria were recruited and after obtaining demographic information, two groups were formed using lottery method Group G and Group P each having 30 patients. Patients were given oral Paracetamol 20 mg/kg and oral Gabapentin 10 mg/kg 120 minutes before induction of anesthesia in Group P and Group G respectively. Post-operatively, patients’ pain was monitored with VAS after every 30 minutes. When VAS exceeded 3, it marked the demand of first post-operative rescue analgesia was given and time was noted. Injection Ketorolac 0.5mg/kg was given as rescue analgesia. Mean time of first rescue analgesia was compared in between 2 groups via SPSS 19 Results: There were no significant differences for variables such as age and BMI in between two groups. The main result of study is that mean time for first rescue analgesia in group G and group P found to be 468.00± 57.14 &amp; 377.00±51.47 minutes respectively. The calculated p-value was P &lt; 0.0001 proving significant difference in duration for first analgesia in between two groups. Conclusion: There is significant difference in mean time for first rescue analgesia after preemptive gabapentin versus paracetamol for pain control after tonsillectomy in children. Keywords: Preemptive Analgesia, Gabapentine, Paracetamol, Post-operative pain control

Analgesic effect of intravenous versus intraperitoneal dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to intraperitoneal bupivacaine (0.125%) in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized, double blind, interventional study

Background and Aims: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has emerged as a gold standard technique for gall bladder stones. The aim of the present study was to compare the analgesic effect of intravenous (IV) vs intraperitoneal (IP) dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to intraperitoneal (IP) bupivacaine in laparoscopy. Methods: A prospective, randomized, double blind, interventional study was conducted on 100 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy where they were divided into following 2 groups: Group A: Patients received IV 1µg/kg dexmedetomidine diluted to 30 ml with normal saline over 10 min and 40 ml of 0.125% bupivacaine IP after removal of gall bladder. Group B: Patients received IV 30 ml of normal saline and 1µg/kg IP dexmedetomidine in 40 ml of 0.125% IP bupivacaine after removal of gall bladder. The primacy outcome was noted as a difference in mean duration for need of first rescue analgesia. The total consumption of analgesic in first 24hours was recorded and compared between the two groups. Results: Both the groups were comparable in terms of demographic profile and intraoperative hemodynamic parameters with no statistical difference. Comparison of time to first analgesic requirement between the two groups showed statistically significant results with unpaired t test The time of first rescue analgesia in Group A was 151.80 min ± 76.624. and in Group B was 94.80min ± 21.499. The total analgesic requirement in 24 hours in Group A was 136.64 ± 31.251 and in Group B was 144.12 ± 21.49. Conclusion: In our study we concluded that intravenous dexmetomidine provided superior analgesia as compared to intraperitoneal dexmetomidine when used as an adjuvant with Bupivacaine intraperitoneally.

Effect of Perineural Dexamethasone with Ropivacaine in Continuous Serratus Anterior Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery.

PurposeThe goal of this study was to evaluate the analgesic efficiency of dexamethasone with ropivacaine in continuous serratus anterior plane block (cSAPB) after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS).Patients and MethodsSixty-six patients who underwent VATS were randomized into two groups. All patients received cSAPB postoperatively, and patients in Group RD received 20 mL of 0.375% ropivacaine plus 0.1 mg/kg dexamethasone followed by an infusion of 0.2% ropivacaine plus 0.02 mg/kg/hour dexamethasone at a rate of 5 mL/h in patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) pump. Patients in Group R received 20 mL of 0.375% ropivacaine with normal saline followed by an infusion of 5 mL/h of 0.2% ropivacaine in PCA pump. Fifty milligrams of tramadol was given as rescue medication when the visual analog scale (VAS) score was ≥4 at rest. The primary outcomes were the sum of pressing number within 48 hours postoperatively and the time to the first patient-controlled bolus. The secondary outcomes were VAS scores, the incidence of rescue analgesia, wound infection and nausea/vomiting.ResultsWithin 48 hours postoperatively, the sum of pressing number was more in Group R (18.33 ± 3.149 vs 16.09 ± 3.292, P = 0.006), and the Log Rank Test showed a significant difference in time to the first patient-controlled bolus (P = 0.006). After the PCA infusion finished, there were significantly lower VAS scores in Group RD at 60 and 72 hours postoperatively (P < 0.001). Additionally, the incidence of rescue analgesia in Group R was significantly more than that in Group RD (P < 0.001). No incision infection was observed in any patient.ConclusionThe cSAPB with ropivacaine plus dexamethasone prolonged the duration of analgesia and motor blockade, reduced pain intensity and rescued analgesia requirements after the end of PCA infusion for patients undergoing VATS, which provide further improvement to continuous perineural block.

Comparison of Analgesic Effects of Intravenous and Intraperitoneal Magnesium Sulphate in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study

Background: Postsurgical pain following laparoscopic cholecystectomy is often associated with delayed recovery and discharge from the hospital. Magnesium sulphate as an adjuvant has shown a potential role as an anti-analgesic drug perioperatively. However, the data on the effectiveness and safety of magnesium sulphate delivered via two distinct routes (intravenous and intraperitoneal) for postoperative pain management is scant.&#x0D; Methods: This prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted on 80 adult patients. Group A (n=40) received 30ml intravenous magnesium sulphate(50mg/kg) and 30ml 0.25% bupivacaine intraperitoneal infiltration. Group B (n=40) received 30ml intraperitoneal infiltration of magnesium sulphate(50mg/kg) along with 0.25% bupivacaine and 30ml intravenous 0.9% normal saline infusion. Postoperative pain-free duration, pain scores (visual analog score), need of rescue analgesia, intraoperative hemodynamics and postoperative complications were noted.&#x0D; Results: The Visual analogue scores at 1,2,4 and 6 postoperative hours were 1.75±0.78, 1.33±0.66, 0.60±0.50, 0.45±0.55 in Group B and 2.13±0.61, 1.65±0.62, 1.28±0.88, 0.73±0.51 in Group A respectively (P-value-0.02,0.03,0.00 and 0.02). The time of the first request for rescue analgesia in Group A was 37.09± 5.54 and in Group B 52.00±4.30 (P value-0.00). Mean heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure were significantly lower in Group A compared to Group B (P-value&lt;0.05). Extubation and emergence time was significantly higher in group A compared to Group B (P-value -0.00). The Abbreviated mental test (AMT)-4 cognition scores were similar in both groups while Alert, Voice, Pain and Unresponsive (AVPU) sedation score was higher at the first postoperative hour in Group A (1.30± 0.46) compared to Group B (1.10 ± 0.30) (P value- 0.026).&#x0D; Conclusion: Intraperitoneal magnesium is a safe and efficient means of controlling postoperative pain. Additionally, it decreases the time required for emergence and extubation as compared to intravenous delivery. Intravenous magnesium has better hemodynamic control in perioperative period.

Caudal Morphine in Pediatric Patients: A Comparison of Two Different Doses in Children Undergoing Infraumbilical Surgery - A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Study.

One of the most feared symptoms of any disease is PAIN. It is a complex phenomenal experience, especially in children. Various methods and medications have been administered through different routes. Regional anesthesia produces marvelous postoperative analgesia and cessation of stress response in infants and children. Caudal epidural analgesia is the most acceptable and popular method of providing intra- and postoperative analgesia for abdominal, perineal, and lower limb surgeries in children. The use of preservative-free morphine as an adjunct to ropivacaine increases the quality and duration of analgesia despite the various side effects. Various articles use various doses of morphine as an adjuvant in caudal epidural analgesia. Hence, we conducted the study to compare the two dosages of morphine that is 20 μg.kg-1 and 30 μg.kg-1 of caudal epidural morphine for infraumblical surgeries with regard to its efficacy and safety and side effect profiles. The study is a prospective, randomized, double-blinded study. Sixty patients were divided into two groups. Group A: 20 μg.kg-1 of morphine was added to 0.2% ropivacaine 1 mL.kg-1 and the solution was made. Group B: 30 μg.kg-1 of morphine was added to 1 mL.kg-1 of 0.2% ropivacaine. Heart rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, SPO2, pain score, and sedation score were recorded immediately, after 15 min, 30 min, 45 min, 1 h, 2 h, 4 h, 8 h, 12 h, 16 h, 18 h, and 24 h were recorded. The mean duration of analgesia is similar in both groups (P = 0.011). The mean duration was 20.517 ± 1.9143 h in Group A and 22.233 ± 1.6853 h in Group B. Children with the requirement of one dose of rescue analgesia in Group A was 83.3% which was higher than Group B being 66.7%. Children with no analgesic requirement were 16.7% in Group A and 33.3% in Group B. The incidence of side effects was more in Group B (8 [26.7%] children with nausea and vomiting; 1 [3.3%] children with urinary retention) than in Group A (2 [6.6%] children with nausea and vomiting. From the above observations, it can be concluded that morphine of less dosage (20 μg.kg-1) when added to 0.2% ropivacaine for the caudal epidural block has better efficacy than morphine of higher dosage (30 μg.kg-1) as the duration of analgesia is similar with decreased incidence of side effects.

Abstract No.: ABS1604: A comparative study of bupivacaine versus ropivacaine in preoperative fascia iliaca compartment block in patients posted for proximal femur fracture surgeries under spinal anaesthesia

Background and Aims:Positioning for spinal anaesthesia is challenging in patients with femur/hip fractures as it causes severe pain/distress. Peripheral nerve blocks are safe adjuncts without side-effects of systemic analgesics. This study was conducted to compare the efficacy between bupivacaine and ropivacaine in ultrasound-guided fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) for positioning of spinal anaesthesia.Methods:70 patients( 35 in each group) of American Society of Anesthesiologists physical class I-III, either sex, aged between 18-70 years, posted for proximal femur surgeries were randomly allocated in two groups. All patients in group B received 30ml of 0.25%bupivacaine and in groupR 30ml of 0.25%ropivacaine was administered for FICB.. Onset of sensory block was noted every two minutes using pinprick method. Fifteen minutes later spinal anaesthesia was performed with 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine in sitting position. Analgesia during positioning was assessed. The quality of patient positioning for spinal anaesthesia was recorded. Vitals were monitored before(baseline) and after block for every 5minutes until 15minutes. The time for first rescue analgesic request and 24h opioid consumption was noted.Results:Mean onset of FICB in group B was 6.17±1.403 minutes and group R was 10.51±1.772 minutes which was statistically significant (p value <0.001). There was no significant difference in visual analogue scale(VAS) during positioning and quality of positioning in both groups. Time to first rescue analgesia in group B was 409.71±85.146 minutes and groupR was 445.71±77.736 minutes (p value 0.0069) but the difference was not statistically significant. There was no significant difference in 24hour opioid consumption among the two groups.Conclusion:FICB provides analgesia which helps in positioning of the patient for spinal anaesthesia with bupivacaine having faster onset of action compared to ropivacaine but provides comparable duration of analgesia and 24 hour opioid consumption.