Requiring Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support Research Articles

Recurrent ventilator-associated pneumonia in severe Covid-19 ARDS patients requiring ECMO support

ObjectiveTo describe ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) recurrence in COVID-19 patients requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support, and to evaluate the impact of antimicrobial treatment duration of the first VAP episode on VAP recurrence.MethodsAdult patients with COVID-19 severe pneumonia on ECMO admitted between March 2020 and January 2022 were retrospectively included. Primary outcome was incidence of VAP recurrence, and secondary outcome was the impact of duration of antimicrobial treatment on VAP recurrence.ResultsAmong the 252 included patients, 226 (90%) developed a first VAP. Sixteen had lung abscess and were excluded, leaving 210 patients. VAP recurrence occurred in 172 patients (82%), with a median (IQR) time from first VAP to recurrence of 10 (7–13) days. Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacteriaceae were respectively responsible for 28% and 52% of first VAP, and 51% and 62% of first recurrence episodes. Among the 210 patients with a first VAP, 158 (75%) received a short course of antibiotics [< 8 days, median (IQR) duration 6 (5–7) days] and 52 (25%) received a prolonged course of antibiotics [≥ 8 days, median (IQR) duration 9 (8–10) days]. Estimated cumulative incidence of VAP recurrence, taking into account death and extubation as competing risks, was not different in patients with short– and prolonged–antimicrobial treatment.ConclusionsIn patients with severe Covid-19–ARDS requiring ECMO support, VAP recurrence occurs frequently, with Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa as predominant causative microorganisms. An antimicrobial treatment of ≥ 8 days for the treatment of first VAP episode did not reduce the risk of VAP recurrence, as compared to shorter duration.

Flexible and Rigid Bronchoscopy for Critically Ill Children on Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.

We aim to describe our experience with bronchoscopy to diagnose and relieve tracheobronchial obstruction in anticipation of decannulation in children on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support. A retrospective cohort study of children on ECMO between 1/2018 and 12/2022. A total of 107 children required ECMO support during the study period for cardiac (n = 48, 45%), pulmonary (n = 38, 36%), or cardiopulmonary dysfunction (n = 21, 20%). Thirty-seven (35%) patients underwent 99 bronchoscopies while on ECMO. Most (76%, n = 75) experienced no improvement or worsening of chest radiography 24 hours following bronchoscopy. Clinical improvement in tidal volumes 48 hours after the first bronchoscopy was noted in 13/25 patients with available data (p = 0.05). Adverse events were seen in 18 (49%) patients who underwent bronchoscopy, including pneumothorax (n = 8, 22%), pneumonia (n = 7, 19%), pulmonary hemorrhage (n = 6, 16%), and sepsis (n = 5, 14%). ECMO courses were longer (25.4 ± 37.2 vs 6.1 ± 8.8 days, p < 0.0001) and more likely to be complicated by pneumonia (p = 0.0004) and sepsis (p = 0.047) in patients who underwent bronchoscopy compared with those who did not. Adverse events following bronchoscopy were associated with the number of bronchoscopies (p = 0.0003) and the presence of obstructive materials but not with the type of bronchoscopy or indication for ECMO. Mortality rates were similar between patients who underwent bronchoscopy and those who did not. Children requiring bronchoscopy represent a subset of the sickest children on ECMO. Bronchoscopy may provide benefit in children with persistent cardiopulmonary failure who could not otherwise be decannulated. Adverse events are associated with the number of bronchoscopies and the presence of obstructive material. 4 Laryngoscope, 2024.

Influence of Covid-19 disease on hemostasis dynamics during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO)1.

COVID-19 causes a considerable degradation of pulmonary function to the point of an acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Over the course of the disease the gas exchange capability of the lung can get impaired to such an extent that extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is needed as a life-saving intervention. In patients COVID-19 as well as ECMO may cause severe coagulopathies which manifest themselves in micro and macro thrombosis. Previous studies established D-dimers as a marker for critical thrombosis of the ECMO system while on admission increased D-dimers are associated with a higher mortality in COIVD-19 patients. It is therefore crucial to determine if COVID-19 poses an increased risk of early thrombosis of the vital ECMO system. 40 patients who required ECMO support were enrolled in a retrospective analysis and assigned into 2 groups. The COVID group consist of 20 COVID-19 patients who required ECMO support (n = 20), whereas 20 ECMO patients without COVID-19 were assigned to the control group. D-dimers, fibrinogen, antithrombin III (AT III), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and platelet count were analysed using locally weighted scatterplot smoothing and MANOVAs. The analysis of both groups shows highly significant differences in the dynamics of hemostasis. The increase in D-dimers that is associated with thrombosis of the ECMO systems occurs in COVID-19 patients around 2 days earlier (p = 2,8115 10-11) while fibrinogen is consumed steadily. In the control group fibrinogen levels increase rapidly after ten days with a plateau phase of around five days (p = 1,407 10-3). Both groups experience a rapid increase in AT III after start of support by ECMO (p = 5,96 10-15). In the COVID group platelet count decreased from 210 giga/l to 130 giga/l within eight days, while in the same time span in the control group platelets decreased from 180 giga/l to 105 giga/l (p = 1,1 10-15). In both groups a marked increase in LDH beyond 5000 U/l occurs (p = 3,0865 10-15). The early increase in D-dimers and decrease in fibrinogen suggests that COVID-19 patients bear an increased risk of early thrombosis of the ECMO system compared to other diseases treated with ECMO. Additionally, the control group shows signs of severe inflammation 10 days after the start of ECMO which were absent in COVID-19 patients.

Impact of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation-related complications on in-hospital mortality.

Although extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a well-established treatment for supporting severe cardiopulmonary failure, the morbidity and mortality of patients requiring ECMO support remain high. Evaluating and correcting potential risk factors associated with any ECMO-related complications may improve care and decrease mortality. This study aimed to assess the predictors of ECMO-related vascular and cerebrovascular complications among adult patients and to test the hypothesis that ECMO-related complications are associated with higher in-hospital mortality rates. This single-center, retrospective study included 856 ECMO runs administered via cannulation of the femoral vessels of 769 patients: venoarterial (VA) ECMO (n = 709, 82.8%) and venovenous (VV) ECMO (n = 147, 17.2%). The study outcomes included the occurrence of ECMO-related vascular and cerebrovascular complications and in-hospital death. The association of ECMO-related complications with the risk of in-hospital death was analyzed. The incidences of ECMO-related vascular and cerebrovascular complications were 20.2% and 13.6%, respectively. The overall in-hospital mortality rate was 48.7%: 52.8% among VA ECMO runs and 29.3% among VV ECMO runs. Multivariable analysis indicated that age (P < 0.01), cardiopulmonary cerebral resuscitation (P < 0.01), continuous renal replacement therapy (P < 0.01), and initial platelet count [<50×103/μL (P = 0.02) and 50-100(×103)/μL (P < 0.01)] were associated with an increased risk of in-hospital death. ECMO-related vascular and cerebrovascular complications were not independently associated with higher in-hospital mortality rates for VA or VV ECMO runs. ECMO-related vascular and cerebrovascular complications were not associated with an increased risk of in-hospital death among adult patients.

Lactate and Lactate Clearance Are Predictive Factors for Mortality in Patients with Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.

Findings of inadequate tissue perfusion might be used to predict the risk of mortality. In this study, we evaluated the effects of lactate and lactate clearance on mortality of patients who had undergone extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Patients younger than 18 years old and who needed venoarterial ECMO support after surgery for congenital heart defects, from July 2010 to January 2019, were retrospectively analyzed. Patients successfully weaned from ECMO constituted Group 1, and patients who could not be weaned from ECMO were in Group 2. Postoperative clinics and follow-ups of the groups including mortality and discharge rates were evaluated. There were 1,844 congenital heart surgeries during the study period, and 55 patients that required ECMO support were included in the study. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups regarding demographics and operative variables. The sixth-, 12th-, and 24th-hour lactate levels in Group 1 were statistically significantly lower than those in Group 2 (P=0.046, P=0.024, and P<0.001, respectively). There were statistically significant differences regarding lactate clearance between the groups at the 24th hour (P=0.009). The cutoff point for lactate level was found as ≥ 2.9, with 74.07% sensitivity and 78.57% specificity (P<0.001). The cutoff point for lactate clearance was determined as 69.44%, with 59.26% sensitivity and 78.57% specificity (P=0.003). Prognostic predictive factors are important to initiate advanced treatment modalities in patients with ECMO support. In this condition, lactate and lactate clearance might be used as a predictive marker.

Vasoactive-Inotropic Score as a Promising Predictor of Acute Kidney Injury in Adult Patients Requiring Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common complication in patients supported by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Vasoactive-Inotropic Score (VIS) serves as an indicator of the extent of cardiovascular drug support provided. Our objective is to assess the relationship between the VIS and ECMO-associated AKI (EAKI). This single-center retrospective study extracted adult patients treated with ECMO between August 2016 and September 2022 from an intensive care unit (ICU) in a university hospital. A total of 126 patients requiring ECMO support were included in the study, of which 76% developed AKI. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified VIS-max Day1 (odds ratio [OR]: 1.025, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.007-1.044, p = 0.006), VIS-max Day2 (OR: 1.038, 95% CI: 1.007-1.069, p = 0.015), VIS-mean Day1 (OR: 1.048, 95% CI: 1.013-1.084, p = 0.007), and VIS-mean Day2 (OR: 1.059, 95% CI: 1.014-1.107, p = 0.010) as independent risk factors for EAKI. VIS-max Day1 showing the best predictive effect (Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC): 0.80, sensitivity: 71.87%, specificity: 80.00%) for EAKI with a cutoff value of 33.33. Surprisingly, VIS-mean Day2 was also excellent at predicting 7 day mortality (AUROC: 0.77, sensitivity: 87.50%, specificity: 56.38%) with a cutoff value of 8.67. In conclusion, VIS could independently predict EAKI and 7 day mortality in patients with ECMO implantation, which may help clinicians to recognize the poor prognosis in time for early intervention.

Pediatric Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Anticoagulation and Monitoring: Where We Were and Where Are We Now?

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support in neonates and pediatric patients has continued to advance. In addition to technologic progress, there is a growing interest in the anticoagulation agents and laboratory monitoring strategies used in children requiring ECMO support. This review summarizes current available evidence and provides guidance for clinicians regarding anticoagulation agents and monitoring.

Peri-operative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in adult and pediatric living donor liver transplantation: a single-center experience.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a potential rescue therapy for patients with acute cardiopulmonary dysfunction refractory to conventional treatment. In this study, we described the clinical profiles and outcomes of adult and pediatric living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) patients who received ECMO support during the peri-operative period. From June 1994 to December 2020, eleven out of the 1,812 LDLTs performed at Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital required ECMO support: six for respiratory failure, three for cardiogenic shock, and two for refractory septic shock. Comparison between the survivor and non-survivor groups was made. The survival rate for liver transplantation (LT) patients on ECMO support is 36.4%-40% in adults and 33.3% in pediatrics, while the survival rate per indication is as follows: acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) (50%), cardiogenic shock (33.3%), and sepsis (0%). Shorter durations of LT-to-ECMO and pre-ECMO mechanical ventilation were observed in the survivor group. On the other hand, we observed persistently elevated total bilirubin levels in non-survivors, while none of the survivors had aspartate aminotransferase (AST)/alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels >1,000 U/L. A higher proportion of non-survivors were on concurrent continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). Our experience has proven ECMO's utility during the peri-operative period for both adult and pediatric LDLT patients, more specifically for indications other than septic shock. Further studies are needed to better understand the factors leading to poor outcomes in order to identify patients who will more likely benefit from ECMO.

229. Predictive markers for bacteremia in patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support

Abstract Background Patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support are critically ill, which can confound the usual metrics clinician use to diagnose bacteremia. The best methods to detect bacteremia in patients receiving ECMO support are unknown, and we sought to evaluate the accuracy of various metrics used in determining bacteremia. Methods A retrospective review of patients receiving ECMO support at Yale New Haven Hospital from April 2020 to September 2021 who had blood cultures obtained for any reason was performed. Reasons for blood culture and metrics associated with bacteremia, including white blood cell count (WBC), maximum daily temperature, and procalcitonin, were evaluated for each blood culture event. If patients became bacteremic, only the first positive blood cultures were included in the analysis. Receiver operator curves for each metric were performed to generate areas under the curve (AUC) for assessing diagnostic accuracy. Results 60 patients who required ECMO support had 132 blood cultures performed, 22 (16.7%) with bacteremia and 110 (83.3%) without. In blood cultures with bacteremia compared to those without, there was no difference in WBC count (17.4 vs 17.9, p = 0.825), maximum daily temperature (37.1 vs 36.9 C, p = 0.572), or procalcitonin (2.0 vs 2.2, p = 0.776) on the day of culture. The most predictive reason for obtaining blood cultures with confirmed bacteremia was hemodynamic instability (AUC 0.668), followed by temperature dysregulation (AUC 0.623). Reasons for obtaining blood cultures minimally associated with bacteremia included adding ice to the ECMO circuit (AUC 0.527), leukocytosis (AUC 0.523), respiratory decompensation (AUC 0.500), surveillance culturing (AUC 0.432), and other reasons not specified but per clinician discretion (AUC 0.386). Conclusion Hemodynamic instability as the reason for obtaining blood cultures was the most predictive of bacteremia in patients on ECMO support, while leukocytosis, temperature change, and surveillance cultures were less well associated. There was no difference in WBC counts, maximum daily temperature, and procalcitonin in patients with bacteremia versus those without. Optimizing clinical criteria to determine bacteremia in patients on ECMO remains challenging and warrants further study. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Should Obesity Be an Exclusion Criterion for Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support? A Scoping Review.

Obesity is often considered a contraindication to extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) candidacy due to technical challenges with vascular access, higher cardiac output requirements, and known associations between obesity and overall increased morbidity and mortality due to chronic health conditions. However, a growing body of literature suggests that ECMO may be as safe and efficacious in both obese and nonobese patients. This scoping review provides a synthesis of the available literature on the outcomes of obese patients supported with (1) venovenous (VV)-ECMO in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) not due to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), (2) VV-ECMO in ARDS due to COVID-19, (3) venoarterial (VA)-ECMO for all indications, and (4) studies combining data of patients supported with VA- and VV-ECMO. A librarian-assisted search was performed using 4 primary electronic medical databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Excerpta Medica database [Embase], and Cochrane Library) from January 2003 to March 2023. Articles that reported outcomes of obese patients requiring ECMO support were included. Two reviewers independently screened titles, abstracts, and full text of articles to determine eligibility. Data extraction was performed using customized fields established a priori within a systematic review software system. A total of 354 publications were imported for screening on titles and abstracts, and 30 studies were selected for full-text review. A total of 26 publications met the inclusion criteria: 7 on VV-ECMO support in non-COVID-19 ARDS patients, 6 on ECMO in COVID-19 ARDS patients, 8 in patients supported with VA-ECMO, and 5 combining both VA- and VV-ECMO data. Although the included studies are limited to retrospective analyses and display a heterogeneity in definitions of obesity and comparison groups, the currently available literature suggests that outcomes and complications of ECMO therapy are equivalent in obese patients as compared to nonobese patients. Hence, obesity as measured by body mass index alone should not be considered an exclusion criterion in the decision to initiate ECMO.

ECMO in adult patients with severe trauma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundSevere trauma can result in cardiorespiratory failure, and when conventional treatment is ineffective, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) can serve as an adjunctive therapy. However, the indications for ECMO in trauma cases are uncertain and clinical outcomes are variable. This study sought to describe the prognosis of adult trauma patients requiring ECMO, aiming to inform clinical decision-making and future research.MethodsA comprehensive search was conducted on Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane, and Scopus databases until March 13, 2023, encompassing relevant studies involving over 5 trauma patients (aged ≥ 16 years) requiring ECMO support. The primary outcome measure was survival until discharge, with secondary measures including length of stay in the ICU and hospital, ECMO duration, and complications during ECMO. Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted to analyze these outcomes. The study quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist, while the certainty of evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) approach.ResultsThe meta-analysis comprised 36 observational studies encompassing 1822 patients. The pooled survival rate was 65.9% (95% CI 61.3–70.5%). Specifically, studies focusing on traumatic brain injury (TBI) (16 studies, 383 patients) reported a survival rate of 66.1% (95% CI 55.4–76.2%), while studies non-TBI (15 studies, 262 patients) reported a survival rate of 68.1% (95% CI 56.9–78.5%). No significant difference was observed between these two survival comparisons (p = 0.623). Notably, studies utilizing venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO) (15 studies, 39.0%, 95% CI 23.3–55.6%) demonstrated significantly lower survival rates than those using venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) (23 studies, 72.3%, 95% CI 63.2–80.7%, p < 0.001). The graded assessment of evidence provided a high degree of certainty regarding the pooled survival.ConclusionsECMO is now considered beneficial for severely traumatized patients, improving prognosis and serving as a valuable tool in managing trauma-related severe cardiorespiratory failure, haemorrhagic shock, and cardiac arrest.

Use of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Primary Graft Dysfunction After Cardiac Transplantation: Results of an A Priori Ventless Approach.

Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) after cardiac transplantation is a devastating complication with increasing frequency lately in the setting of donation after circulatory death (DCD). Severe PGD is commonly treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) using central or peripheral cannulation. We retrospectively reviewed the outcomes of PGD after cardiac transplantation requiring ECMO support at our center from 2015 to 2020, focused on our now preferential approach using peripheral cannulation without a priori venting. During the study period, 255 patients underwent heart transplantation at our center and 26 (10.2%) of them required ECMO for PGD. Of 24 patients cannulated peripherally 19 (79%) were alive at 30 days and 17 (71%) 1 year after transplant; two additional patients underwent central ECMO cannulation due to unfavorable size of femoral vessels and concern for limb ischemia. Successful decannulation with full graft function recovery occurred in 22 of 24 (92%) patients cannulated peripherally. Six of them had an indwelling intra-aortic balloon pump placed before the transplantation. None of the other 18 patients received a ventricular vent. In conclusion, the use of an a priori peripheral and ventless ECMO approach in patients with PGD after heart transplant is an effective strategy associated with high rates of graft recovery and survival.

Ambulatory extracorporeal membrane oxygenation simulator: The next frontier in clinical training.

Current medical simulators for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) are expensive and rely on low-fidelity methodologies. This creates a challenge that demands a new approach to eliminate high costs and integrate with critical care environments, especially in light of the scarce resources and supplies available after the COVID-19 pandemic. To address this challenge, we examined the current state-of-the-art medical simulators and collaborated closely with Hamad Medical Corporation (HMC), the primary healthcare provider in Qatar, to establish criteria for advancing the cutting-edge ECMO simulation. This article presents a comprehensive ambulatory high-realism and cost-effective ECMO simulator. Over the past 3years, we have surveyed relevant literature, gathered data, and continuously developed a prototype of the system modules and the accompanying tablet application. By doing so, we have successfully addressed the issue of cost and fidelity in ECMO simulation, providing an effective tool for medical professionals to improve their understanding and treatment of patients requiring ECMO support. This paper will focus on presenting an overall ambulatory ECMO simulator, detailing the various sub-systems and emphasizing the modular casing of the physical components and the simulated patient monitor.

Palliative Care Utilization in Patients Requiring Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: An Observational Study.

Palliative care (PC) is a model of care centered around improving the quality of life for individuals with life-limiting illnesses. Few studies have examined its impact in patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). We aimed to describe demographics, clinical characteristics, and complications associated with PC consultation in adult patients requiring ECMO support. We analyzed data from an ECMO registry, including patients aged 18 years and older who have received either venoarterial (VA)- or venovenous (VV)-ECMO support between July 2016 and September 2021. We used analysis of variance and Fisher exact tests to identify factors associated with PC consultation. Of 256, 177 patients (69.1%) received VA-ECMO support and 79 (30.9%) received VV-ECMO support. Overall, 115 patients (44.9%) received PC consultation while on ECMO. Patients receiving PC consultation were more likely to be non-white (47% vs. 53%, p = 0.016), have an attending physician from a medical versus surgical specialty (65.3% vs. 39.6%), have VV-ECMO (77.2% vs. 30.5%, p < 0.001), and have longer ECMO duration (6.2 vs. 23.0, p < 0.001). Patients were seen by the PC team on an average of 7.6 times (range, 1-35), with those who died having significantly more visits (11.2 vs. 5.6, p < 0.001) despite the shorter hospital stay. The average time from cannulation to the first PC visit was 5.3 ± 5 days. Congestive heart failure in VA-ECMO, coronavirus disease 2019 infection in VV-ECMO, and non-white race and longer ECMO duration for all patients were associated with PC consultation. We found that despite the benefits of PC, it is underused in this population.

EFFICACY OF SUPPLEMENTAL HEMOADSORPTION THERAPY ON SEVERE AND CRITICAL PATIENTS WITH COVID-19: AN EVIDENCE-BASED ANALYSIS.

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has posed a disproportionately high threat to the global health system and social stability. COVID-19 damage can lead to hyperinflammation and tissue damage due to a "cytokine storm," which in turn contributes to an increase in the mortality rate. Extracorporeal hemoadsorption therapy (HAT) in patients with severe COVID-19 may improve organ function and stabilize hemodynamic status; however, the effects of supplemental HAT remain controversial. Methods: The Cochrane Library, Embase, and PubMed databases were comprehensively searched from inception to August 20, 2022, for potential studies. Results: A total of 648 patients with severe COVID-19 in three randomized controlled trials and 11 observational studies met the inclusion criteria. A meta-analysis indicated that supplemental HAT significantly improved the mortality rate of patients with severe COVID-19 compared with conventional therapy (relative risk [RR] = 0.74, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.56 to 0.96, P = 0.026). In subgroup analyses, supplemental HAT significantly decreased mortality rates in patients without extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support (RR = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.44-0.79, P < 0.0001), while a significant difference was not observed in patients requiring ECMO support (RR = 1.61, 95% CI = 0.63-4.09, P = 0.316). Standardized mean difference (SMD) meta-analysis showed that IL-6 removal was more significant in HAT group than conventional therapy group (SMD = 0.46, 95% CI = 0.01 to 0.91, P = 0.043), followed by C-reactive protein (SMD = 0.70, 95% CI = -0.04 to 1.44, P = 0.065) and IL-8 (SMD = 0.36, 95% CI = -0.34 to 1.07, P = 0.311). No evidence of substantial publication bias concerning mortality was observed. Conclusion: Given the better mortality outcomes, HAT confers clinical benefits to patients with severe COVID-19, which correlated with cytokine removal by HAT. Cytokine adsorption may not provide clinical benefits for patients with severe COVID-19 requiring ECMO and should be used with caution. However, because of the very low quality of evidence, multicenter randomized trials with large sample sizes are required to verify these findings.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and beyond in near fatal asthma: A comprehensive review

The treatment of choice in severe asthma exacerbations with respiratory failure includes ventilatory support, both invasive and/or non-invasive, along with different kinds of asthma medication. Of note, the rate of mortality of patients with asthma has decreased substantially in recent years mainly due to significant advances in pharmacological treatment and other management strategies. However, the risk of death in patients with severe asthma who require invasive mechanical ventilation has been estimated between 6.5% and 10.3%. When conventional measures fail, rescue strategies, such as extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) or extracorporeal CO2 removal (ECCO2R) may need to be implemented. While ECMO does not constitute a definitive treatment per se, it can minimize further ventilator associated lung injury (VALI) and can enable diagnostic-therapeutic maneuvers that cannot be performed without ECMO such as bronchoscopy and transfer for diagnostic imaging. Asthma is one of the diseases that is associated with excellent outcomes for patients with refractory respiratory failure requiring ECMO support, as shown by the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) registry. Moreover, in such situations, the use of ECCO2R for rescue has been described and utilized in both children and adults and is more widely spread in different hospitals than ECMO. In this article, we aim to review the evidence for the usefulness of extracorporeal respiratory support measures in the management of severe asthma exacerbations that lead to respiratory failure.

Clinical Outcome Comparison of Patients Requiring Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation With or Without COVID-19 Infection.

In severe COVID-19-related respiratory failure, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a useful modality that is used to provide effective oxygenation and ventilation to the patient. This descriptive study aimed to investigate and compare the outcomes between COVID-19-infected patients and patients who were not infected and required ECMO support. A retrospective study was undertaken on a cohort of 82 adult patients ([Formula: see text]18-year-old) who required venoarterial (VA-ECMO) and venovenous (VV-ECMO) ECMO between January 2019 and December 2022 in a single academic center. Patients who were cannulated for COVID-19-related respiratory failure (C-group) were compared to patients who were cannulated for non-COVID etiologies (non-group). Patients were excluded if data were missing regarding cannulation, decannulation, presenting diagnosis, and survival status. Categorical data were reported as counts and percentages, and continuous data were reported as means with 95% confidence intervals. Out of the 82 included ECMO patients, 33 (40.2%) were cannulated for COVID-related reasons, and 49 (59.8%) were cannulated for reasons other than COVID-19 infection. Compared to the non-group, the C-group had a higher in-hospital (75.8% vs. 55.1%) and overall mortality rate (78.8% vs. 61.2%). The C-group also had an average hospital length of stay (LOS) of 46.6 ± 13.2 days and an average intensive care unit (ICU) LOS of 44.1 ± 13.3 days. The non-group had an average hospital LOS of 24.8 ± 6.6 days and an average ICU LOS of 20.8 ± 5.9 days. Subgroup analysis of patients only treated with VV-ECMO yielded a greater in-hospital mortality rate for the C-group compared to the non-group (75.0% vs. 42.1%). COVID-19-infected patients may experience different morbidity and mortality rates as well as clinical presentations compared to non-COVID-infected patients when requiring ECMO support.

Tickle Me ECMO…Differences and Outcomes Unearthed for Kids Requiring Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2-Associated Disease.

Tickle Me ECMO…Differences and Outcomes Unearthed for Kids Requiring Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2-Associated Disease.

Brief Overview of the Use of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) in COVID-19 Patients with Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)

Background A serious complication of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Hypoxemia refractory to traditional management, including invasive positive pressure ventilation, is not uncommon with COVID-19. It can lead to circulatory failure necessitating the use of mechanical circulatory support devices, specifically extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Aim This paper provides a brief update on the use and indications of ECMO for adult patients with COVID-19 around the world. Methods We conducted a rapid umbrella review on the use of ECMO in treating COVID-19-related ARDS (CARDS), as well as current indications and contraindications for the initiation of ECMO. We reviewed the use of venovenous (V-V) ECMO and veno-arterial (V-A) ECMO in CARDS. Findings V-V ECMO is the primary ECMO mode employed in the majority of the patients who required ECMO support for CARDS. Although the duration of V-V ECMO in COVID-19 was longer than the V-V ECMO in non-COVID-19 patients with ARDS, the mortality rate appears similar. Meta-analyses reviewed reported an in-hospital mortality rate ranging from 37% to 49% for COVID-19 patients who required V-V ECMO. Conclusion The survival benefit of ECMO in COVID-19 patients with severe cardiopulmonary failure is not clearly established, but V-V ECMO may be considered in adults with COVID-19 and severe cardiopulmonary compromise when resources are available. V-A ECMO may be considered in COVID-19 patients with severe cardiac failure, but limited data are available on survival benefits.

Inadequate Energy Delivery Is Frequent among COVID-19 Patients Requiring ECMO Support and Associated with Increased ICU Mortality

Background: Patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support are at high risk for malnutrition. There are currently no general nutrition guidelines for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients during ECMO therapy. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of COVID-19 patients requiring venovenous ECMO support at a large tertiary hospital center. Nutrition goals were calculated using 25 kcal/kg body weight (BW)/day. Associations between nutrition support and outcome were evaluated using Kaplan–Meier and multivariable Cox regression analyses. Results: Overall, 102 patients accounted for a total of 2344 nutrition support days during ECMO therapy. On 40.6% of these days, nutrition goals were met. Undernutrition was found in 40.8%. Mean daily calorie delivery was 73.7% of calculated requirements, mean daily protein delivery was 0.7 g/kg BW/d. Mean energy intake of ≥70% of calculated targets was associated with significantly lower ICU mortality independently of age, disease severity at ECMO start and body mass index (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.372, p = 0.007). Conclusions: Patients with a mean energy delivery of ≥70% of calculated targets during ECMO therapy had a better ICU survival compared to patients with unmet energy goals. These results indicate that adequate nutritional support needs to be a major priority in the treatment of COVID-19 patients requiring ECMO support.