Requiring Iron Chelation Therapy Research Articles

HUBUNGAN TINGKAT KEPATUHAN KONSUMSI OBAT KELASI BESI DENGAN KADAR FERRITIN PADA PASIEN THALASSEMIA ANAK DI RSUD DR. MOEWARDI

Thalassemia is a hereditary hemolytic disease caused by mutations in the hemoglobin synthesis chain. Transfusion-dependent thalassemia patients require iron chelation therapy to prevent complications of iron overload. Adherence with regular iron chelation consumption is important for good survival, reducing morbidity and mortality in thalassemia patients. This research is an analysis of an observational study with a cross-sectional approach. This research was conducted at RSUD Dr. Moewardi. The subjects of this study were pediatric thalassemia patients who were taking deferiprone iron chelating drugs. The sample was taken using purposive sampling method, by analysing medical record data and the MMAS-8 questionnaire. Data were examined using the chi-square test with the SPSS application. Results: There were 56 subjects to be analyzed consisting of 23 males and 33 females. Based on the chi-square test, there was a significant relationship between consumption of iron chelating drugs and ferritin levels with p = 0.026. In addition, another study was conducted using the chi-square test regarding nutritional status and duration of thalassemia illness on ferritin levels. The results obtained were p value = 0.977 for the relationship between nutritional status and p value = 0.977 for the long duration of thalassemia illness. It can be concluded that both of them have no significant effect on ferritin levels. Adherence with taking iron chelating drugs has a significant relationship to ferritin levels in thalassemia patients.

Comparison of Visual Evoked Potential in Thalassemia Patients Receiving Iron Chelation Therapy

Patients of thalassemia require iron chelation therapy for the treatment of iron overload in the form of desferrioxamine (DFO), combination of DFO and deferiprone and oral deferiprone only. One of the side effects of DFO is ocular toxicity. Present study was conducted to elicit the subclinical effects of DFO on visual pathways by doing Visual Evoked Potential (VEP). Forty five patients of thalassemia major were divided into three groups (I, II &III) based on their iron chelation therapy as desferrioxamine, combination of desferrioxamine& deferiprone and only deferiprone respectively. VEP was recorded in each group and comparison was done. In VEP P100 was significantly prolonged in the group of thalassemia patients receiving DFO and combination of DFO and deferiprone suggesting vulnerability to ocular toxicity of DFO. We can suggest that in patients receiving chronic DFO therapy, VEPs may be considered to monitor the toxic effects of DFO on visual system. Keywords: Thalassemia, iron chelation, visual evoked potential.

Randomized Controlled Trial of the Efficacy and Safety of Deferiprone: Subgroup Analysis of Pediatric Patients in Iron-Overloaded Patients with Sickle Cell Disease and Other Anemias

Randomized Controlled Trial of the Efficacy and Safety of Deferiprone: Subgroup Analysis of Pediatric Patients in Iron-Overloaded Patients with Sickle Cell Disease and Other Anemias

Long-Term Effectiveness, Safety, and Tolerability of Twice-Daily Dosing with Deferasirox in Children with Transfusion-Dependent Thalassemias Unresponsive to Standard Once-Daily Dosing.

BackgroundPatients with transfusion-dependent thalassemia (TDT) risk iron overload and require iron chelation therapy. Second-line therapy is warranted for patients demonstrating poor chelation responses.Patients and methodsWe retrospectively studied the serum-ferritin (SF), and liver-iron-concentration (LIC) outcomes of patients with TDT treated with twice-daily dosing of deferasirox (TDD-DFX) > 24 months, after failing to respond to once-daily deferasirox (OD-DFX).ResultsWe enrolled 22 OD-DFX nonresponders (14 males and eight females; median age, 9.2 [3–15.5] years). The median blood transfusion was 216 (206–277) ml/kg/year. The median TDD-DFX treatment period was 30 (24–35) months. Before initiating TDD-DFX, the median SF level was 2,486 (1,562–8,183) ng/ml, while the median LIC was 6.6 (3.2–19) mg/g dry wt. There were 18 TDD-DFX responders (81.8%) and 4 TDD-DFX nonresponders. The median SF-level change was −724 (−4,916 to 1,490) ng/mL. The median LIC change was −2.14 (−13.7 to 6.8) mg/g dry wt. The 1-year and 2-year SF levels and LICs were statistically significant (SF, P = 0.006/0.005; and LIC, 0.006/0.005, respectively). There were no treatment interruptions secondary to adverse events. In the follow-up of the TDD-DFX responder group, 11 of the 18 had a reduced dose, whereas the remaining seven continued with the same dose.ConclusionsTDD-DFX appears to be an alternative treatment approach for patients refractory to OD-DFX, with a favorable long-term safety profile. Further studies with larger groups and pharmacogenetic analyses of OD-DFX responders are warranted to determine the efficacy and safety profile of TDD-DFX.

Outcomes of haemoglobin Bart’s hydrops fetalis following intrauterine transfusion in Ontario, Canada

ObjectivesWith improved access to intrauterine transfusion (IUT), more fetuses with haemoglobin Bart’s hydrops fetalis (HBHF; homozygous α0-thalassaemia) will survive.DesignTo evaluate the long-term outcome of affected fetuses with and without IUT...

Qualitative modification and development of patient- and caregiver-reported outcome measures for iron chelation therapy

BackgroundCompliance, palatability, gastrointestinal (GI) symptom, and treatment satisfaction patient- and observer-reported outcome (PRO, ObsRO) measures were developed/modified for patients with transfusion-dependent anemias or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) requiring iron chelation therapy (ICT).MethodsThis qualitative cross-sectional observational study used grounded theory data collection and analysis methods and followed PRO/ObsRO development industry guidance. Patients and caregivers of patients with transfusion-dependent anemias or MDS were individually interviewed face-to-face to cognitively debrief the Compliance, Palatability, GI Symptom Diary, and Modified Satisfaction with Iron Chelation Therapy (SICT) instruments presented electronically. Interviews were conducted in sets. Interviews began open-endedly to spontaneously elicit ICT experiences. Item modifications were debriefed during the later interviews. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed, and coded. Data was analyzed using ATLAS.ti qualitative research software.ResultsTwenty-one interviews were completed (Set 1: 5 patients, 6 caregivers; Set 2: 6 patients, 4 caregivers) in 6 US cities. Mean age was 43 years for patients and 9 years for children of caregivers. Conditions requiring ICT use across groups included transfusion-dependent anemias (85.7%) and MDS (14.3%). Concepts spontaneously reported were consistent with instruments debriefed. Interview analysis resulted in PRO and ObsRO versions of each instrument: Compliance (2 items), Palatability (4 items), GI Symptom Diary (6 items), and Modified SICT (PRO = 13, ObsRO = 17 items).ConclusionQualitative research data from cognitive interviews supports the content validity and relevance of the instruments developed/modified. Quantitative validation of these PRO and ObsRO measures is needed testing for validity, reliability, and responsiveness for future research use with new formulations of oral ICT.

Multiple Packed Red Blood Cell (PRBC) Transfusions In Pediatric Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Result In a Large Transfusional Iron Dose With The Potential For Long-Term Organ Dysfunction

▪The treatment of AML in children utilizes intensive chemotherapy and often myeloablative hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT). This results in significant myelosuppression, necessitating blood product transfusions. Repeated PRBC transfusions result in an increase in the body iron load which can lead to secondary hemochromatosis and organ dysfunction, particularly the heart and liver. Patients with hemoglobinopathies on chronic PRBC transfusions require iron chelation therapy usually after 10-20 units transfused. While patients with AML receive multiple transfusions, there is little data on the number or volume of PRBC transfused or the estimate of the iron load received.This retrospective study evaluated the number and volumes of PRBC transfusions administered to pediatric (<14 years) patients with AML, and calculated an estimate of the iron infused.Twenty-two patients with AML were diagnosed and treated at our institution between January 2010 and December 2012. There were 13 girls and 9 boys with a median age at diagnosis of 7.5 years (mean 6.95; range 0.4-13.2). One patient died early of sepsis without achieving complete remission (CR), and another died in CR following her last course of chemotherapy. Eight patients underwent HCT following myeloablative conditioning with busulfan, cyclophosphamide and etoposide; the remaining received chemotherapy alone. For patients who completed their chemotherapy the cumulative anthracycline dose was 450 mg/m2. Patients received a median of 17.5 PRBC transfusions (mean 16.6; range 3-28) during the course of their treatment. The cumulative PRBC transfusion volume was 185.4 ml/kg (mean 175.8; range 24.87 – 311.58), which translates to a median iron dose of 129.8 mg/kg (mean 123.1; range 17.4 – 218.1). The median serum ferritin level for those patients who were tested (n=12) was 1794.5 mg/L (mean 9074.5; range 699 – 78500). The median projected hepatic iron content, based on the transfused iron burden was 12.24 mg/g liver dry weight (mean 11.61; range 1.64 – 20.58); 17 (77.3%) patients had projected hepatic iron concentrations in excess of 7.0 mg/g, and none were <1.6 mg/g. Ten patients have developed a > 10 percentage point reduction in their left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF; range -11% to -45%) however only one patient is on cardiac failure medications. Cardiac T2* MRI studies are being conducted to evaluate cardiac iron status for patients in this cohort. 13 patients were alive in CR at a median follow-up duration of 1.83 years (mean 2.16; range 0.27 – 3.43).Pediatric patients with AML receive large volumes of PRBC transfusions during their treatment and as a consequence accumulate high total body iron. This is in excess of the threshold for chelation therapy, used to prevent organ dysfunction, in patients with hemoglobinopathies. In addition, AML patient also receive significant cardio-toxic medications which may compound the effect of iron on the myocardium. With improvements in long term survival for patients with AML the addition of iron chelation therapy must be studied in order to prevent long term toxicity of AML therapy. Disclosures:No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Toward optimizing the use of deferasirox: potential benefits of combined use with deferoxamine

Patients with β-thalassemia require iron chelation therapy to protect against progressive iron overload and non-transferrin-bound iron. Some patients fail to respond adequately to deferoxamine and deferasirox monotherapy while others have side effects which limit their use of these drugs. Since combining deferiprone and deferoxamine has an additive effect, placing all patients into net negative iron balance, we investigated the possibility that combining deferasirox and deferoxamine would lead to similar results. We conducted 34-day metabolic iron balance studies in six patients in whom the relative effectiveness of deferasirox (30 mg/kg/day) and deferoxamine (40 mg/kg/day) was compared, alone and in combination. Patients consumed fixed low-iron diets; daily urinary and stool iron excretion were determined by atomic absorption. Red blood cell transfusions were given prior to each drug treatment to minimize the effects of ineffective erythropoiesis. Serial safety measures, hematologic parameters, serum chemistries, ferritin levels and urinalyses were determined. All patients were in negative iron balance when treated with deferoxamine alone while four of six patients remained in positive balance when deferasirox monotherapy was evaluated. Daily use of both drugs had a synergistic effect in two patients and an additive effect in three others. Five of six patients would be in negative iron balance if they used the combination of drugs just 3 days a week. No significant or drug-related changes were observed in the blood work-ups or urinalyses performed. We conclude that supplementing the daily use of deferasirox with 2 - 3 days of deferoxamine therapy would place all patients into net negative iron balance thereby providing a convenient way to tailor chelation therapy to the individual needs of each patient.

Managing iron overload in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes with oral deferasirox therapy.

Patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) often require chronic RBC transfusions, which can lead to iron overload. Without adequate management, this may cause progressive damage to hepatic, endocrine, and cardiac organs, significantly affecting overall survival. Recent retrospective analyses have suggested that iron chelation provides a survival advantage in iron-overloaded patients with MDS who are given chelation therapy compared with those who are not. Nonetheless, it is evident that iron overload in many patients with MDS is not adequately managed. Clinical evaluation of the once-daily, oral iron chelator deferasirox in MDS populations has indicated that it provides dose-dependent reductions in body iron burden and is generally well tolerated, with a manageable safety profile in adult and pediatric patients. The most common treatment-related adverse events (AEs) included transient, mild-to-moderate gastrointestinal disturbances and skin rash, which rarely required drug discontinuation and resolved spontaneously in most cases. Adequate management of AEs and practical approaches such as patient education and counseling are necessary to ensure that patients remain compliant with therapy. Regular monitoring of serum ferritin levels is key to identifying patients who require iron chelation therapy, and to ensure maintenance of iron levels below the critical level of 1,000 microg/l. The flexible dosing regimen of deferasirox allows dose adjustments to be made in response to trends in serum ferritin, to changes in a patient's transfusional iron intake, and to the objectives of treatment, allowing the full benefit of transfusion therapy without the risks associated with iron overload.

Cost-utility analysis of deferasirox compared to standard therapy with desferrioxamine for patients requiring iron chelation therapy in the United Kingdom

ABSTRACTObjective: The primary objective of the study was to evaluate the cost-utility of deferasirox (Exjade) compared to standard therapy using desferrioxamine (Desferal) for the control of iron overload in patients receiving frequent blood transfusions. The perspective adopted was that of the National Health Service in the UK.Methods: Phase II/III clinical trials have shown deferasirox in the recommended doses of 20–30 mg/kg per day to have similar efficacy to desferrioxamine at equivalent doses in the control of chronic iron overload. The main difference between them is in the mode of administration. Desferrioxamine is administered parenterally as a slow subcutaneous infusion typically infused 8–12 hours a day for 5–7 days a week. In comparison, deferasirox provides 24 hour chelation via a once daily oral tablet dispersed in water or juice. An excel based economic model was developed to evaluate the annual healthcare costs and quality of life, or utility, benefits associated with differences in mode of administration, using β-thalassaemia as the reference case. A community utility study using time trade-off methods was performed to determine utility outcomes associated with iron chelation therapy (ICT) mode of administration.Results: In the reference case (patient mean weight 42 kg), deferasirox “dominated” desferrioxamine, i.e. resulted in lower net costs and higher quality adjusted life years (QALYs). Drug dose and cost is patient weight related. Incremental cost per QALY gained was £7775 for patients with a mean weight of 62 kg.Conclusions: The cost-utility analysis did not take drug compliance into account. However, Deferasirox is cost-effective compared to standard iron chelation therapy with desferrioxamine, due to the cost and quality of life benefits derived from a simpler and more convenient oral mode of administration.

Consequences and costs of noncompliance with iron chelation therapy in patients with transfusion‐dependent thalassemia: a literature review

Patients with thalassemia major require iron chelation therapy (ICT) to prevent complications from transfusional iron overload. Deferoxamine is effective, but requires administration as a slow continuous subcutaneous or intravenous infusion five to seven times per week. Deferiprone is a three-times-daily oral iron chelator, but has limited availability in the United States. Deferasirox is a once-daily oral iron chelator that was approved in the United States in 2005 for patients older than 2 years of age with transfusional iron overload. Published evidence on rates of compliance with ICT and the association between compliance, and the incidence and costs of complications of iron overload, in patients with thalassemia major was reviewed. A total of 18 studies were identified reporting data on compliance with ICT, including 7 that examined deferoxamine only, 6 that examined deferiprone only, and 5 that compared deferoxamine and deferiprone; no studies reporting compliance with deferasirox were identified. In studies of deferoxamine only, estimated mean compliance ranged from 59 to 78 percent. Studies of deferiprone generally reported better compliance, ranging from 79 to 98 percent. Results of comparative studies of deferoxamine and deferiprone suggest that compliance may be better with oral therapy. Numerous studies demonstrate that that poor compliance with ICT results in increased risk of cardiac disease and endocrinopathies, as well as lower survival. Although data on the costs of noncompliance are limited, a recent model-based study estimated the lifetime costs of inadequate compliance with deferoxamine to be $33,142. Inadequate compliance with ICT in thalassemia major is common and results in substantial morbidity and mortality, as well as increased costs.

Clinical use, therapeutic aspects and future potential of deferiprone in thalassemia and other conditions of iron and other metal toxicity.

The therapeutic aspects and future prospects of the new iron chelating drug deferiprone are reviewed, with an emphasis on its clinical use in thalassemia and other conditions of iron overload, imbalance and toxicity, as well as its possible use in other metal toxicity conditions. Orally administered deferiprone appears to be as effective as subcutaneous deferoxamine in the removal of iron in transfused iron loaded patients, with an equivalent therapeutic index profile in both animals and humans. Only about 10% of patients requiring iron chelation therapy worldwide receive deferoxamine mainly because of its high cost, toxicity and low compliance with subcutaneous administration. Deferiprone has been used by over 6000 patients in 40 countries worldwide, in some cases daily for more than 10 years, with very promising results. Doses of 50-120 mg/kg/day are effective in bringing patients to negative iron balance. Deferiprone increases urinary iron excretion, decreases serum ferritin levels and reduces liver iron in the majority of chronically transfused iron loaded patients. All of the toxic side effects of deferiprone are considered reversible and manageable, and include agranulocytosis, musculoskeletal and joint pains, gastrointestinal complaints and zinc deficiency. In general, the incidence of toxic side effects could be reduced by using lower doses or combination therapy with deferoxamine. The suggestion that deferiprone therapy may cause liver fibrosis has not been confirmed. New therapeutic protocols for maximizing the efficacy and minimizing the toxicity of deferiprone are being considered based on new findings in relation to its metal chelation, pharmacological, toxicological and metabolic properties. (c) 2001 Prous Science. All rights reserved.

Transfusional iron overload and chelation therapy with deferoxamine and deferiprone (L1)

Iron is essential for all living organisms. Under normal conditions there is no regulatory and rapid iron excretion in humans and body iron levels are mainly regulated from the absorption of iron from the gut. Regular blood transfusions in thalassaemia and other chronic refractory anaemias can result in excessive iron deposition in tissues and organs. This excess iron is toxic, resulting in tissue and organ damage and unless it is removed it can be fatal to those chronically transfused. Iron removal in transfusional iron overload is achieved using chelation therapy with the chelating drugs deferoxamine (DF) and deferiprone (L1). Effective chelation therapy in chronically transfused patients can only be achieved if iron chelators can remove sufficient amounts of iron, equivalent to those accumulated in the body from transfusions, maintaining body iron load at a non-toxic level. In order to maintain a negative iron balance, both chelating drugs have to be administered almost daily and at high doses. This form of administration also requires that a chelator has low toxicity, good compliance and low cost. DF has been a life-saving drug for thousands of patients in the last 40 years. It is mostly administered by subcutaneous infusion (40–60 mg/kg, 8–12 h, 5 days per week), is effective in iron removal and has low toxicity. However, less than 10% of the patients requiring iron chelation therapy worldwide are able to receive DF because of its high cost, low compliance and in some cases toxicity. In the last 10 years we have witnessed the emergence of oral chelation therapy, which could potentially change the prognosis of all transfusional iron-loaded patients. The only clinically available oral iron chelator is L1, which has so far been taken by over 6000 patients worldwide, in some cases daily for over 10 years, with very promising results. L1 was able to bring patients to a negative iron balance at doses of 50–120 mg/kg/day. It increases urinary iron excretion, decreases serum ferritin levels and reduces liver iron in the majority of chronically transfused iron-loaded patients. Despite earlier concerns of possible increased risk of toxicity, all the toxic side effects of L1 are currently considered reversible, controllable and manageable. These include agranulocytosis (0.6%), musculoskeletal and joint pains (15%), gastrointestinal complaints (6%) and zinc deficiency (1%). The incidence of these toxic side effects could in general be reduced by using lower doses of L1 or combination therapy with DF. Combination therapy could also benefit patients experiencing toxicity with DF and those not responding to either chelator alone. The overall efficacy and toxicity of L1 is comparable to that of DF in both animals and humans. Despite the steady progress in iron chelation therapy with DF and L1, further investigations are required for optimising their use in patients by selecting improved dose protocols, by minimising their toxicity and by identifying new applications in other diseases of iron imbalance.

Present status and future prospects of oral iron chelation therapy in thalassaemia and other diseases.

In the last few years we have witnessed the emergence of oral chelation which is a new form of therapy for transfusional iron-loaded patients in thalassaemia and other refractory anaemias. The need for a cheap, non-toxic, orally effective iron chelator is paramount because it could potentially save the lives of many thousands of patients. At present, less than 10% of the patients requiring iron chelation therapy worldwide receive the widely used chelating drug desferrioxamine (DF) because of its high cost, oral inactivity and toxicity. The most promising oral iron chelator is 1, 2-dimethyl-3-hydroxypyrid-4-one (L1 or INN: Deferiprone), which has so far been taken by over 450 patients in 15 countries, and in some cases daily for over 4 years with very promising results. L1 was shown at 50-100 mg/kg/day to be effective in bringing patients to negative iron balance. It increases urinary iron excretion, decreases serum ferritin levels and reduces liver iron in multi-transfused iron-loaded patients. Toxic side effects were mainly encountered at high doses (80-100 mg/kg/day) and include transient agranulocytosis (5 cases), transient musculoskeletal and joint pains (10-20%), gastric intolerance (2-6%) and zinc deficiency (1%). The incidence of these toxic side effects was reduced by using lower doses of 50-75 mg/kg/day. The overall efficacy and toxicity of L1 is comparable to that of DF in animals and humans. Further work is required for identifying susceptible individuals to L1 toxicity, and also optimum dose protocols of L1 which can maximise iron excretion and minimise the incidence of toxic side effects.