ITHE TITLE OF OUR CONFERENCE, God's back with vengeance, alludes to banishment that precedes coming back. return explains how has manoeuvred its way back into the discursive practices of political society. Manoeuvring connotes war, and all wars are marked by subterfuges. Thus time and the passing of time are implied. title, I take it, does however mean that representations of God have ever been absent from the personal and collective consciousness of any people. What the title of our conference implies, rather, is the fusion of the public and personal domains in such way that faith has come to play important role in shaping public policies.In the west, as in the rest of the world, the end of the Cold War has ushered in new reality. new reality engenders narratives of transition, which are, more often than not, marked by fear, consternation, and angst. Such narratives attempt to account for the dramatic collision between self and history. In the process the collision produces an unhappy consciousness, to quote from Hegel. Apocalyptic stories become the staple diet of people with such consciousness. Ironically, the new reality represents the future in reverse. We are back to the future. Our responses to the new reality also resemble those of the past. We find solace in paths already trail-blazed by others before us. Let me cite example with anecdote.A man is seen on stage looking for something in well-lit spot. A policeman joins the man, and asks him what it is he is looking for. The key to my house, he answers. policeman then joins in the search. After while and with no key in sight, the policeman asks, Are you sure you lost it here? No, says the man, and pointing to dark corner of the stage: Over there. Bewildered, the policeman then asks the man, Then why are you looking for it here? There is no light over there, says the man.When subjected to overt interpretations, anecdotes lose their lustre and crispness, but bear with me for second as I flush out some points by violating the sanctity of the joke. A man loses the key to his house/home, with all that it connotes: coziness, comfort, security. key is lost in dark, unlit place, yet the search for it takes place in well-lit spot. This is what I am driving at. anecdote registers in us the need for mustering courage in looking for the lost key, and by extension, for answers to our troubled world in places unlit by early epistemological expeditions. We have come to epistemological dead end. To get out of this dead end, we must re-examine and rethink the terms and assumptions that dot the landscape of our syllogistic propositions. These terms and assumptions define, consciously or unconsciously, our perceptions of the world. Here I propose the following:First, there is no single ontological model, master narrative that explains all other narratives.Second, history does have single telos whose desired end product is the replication of western modernity.Third, the modern world-the Renaissance-is, to quote from Menocal, not beginning but end, and lamentable closure. Renaissance brought to end human experiment, universal endeavour to inaugurate a highly productive hybridity.1Fourth, secularism does mean the absence of religion. Rather, it denotes the separation between religion and state. secular state was put in place in order to end all wars.Fifth, fundamentalism is universal movement. It is movement that started in the US in the 1870s. From its very inception, the movement emphasized the infallibility of scriptures and the shoring up of eschatological beliefs-resurrection from death and the second coming of the Christ. Scopes Monkey Trial of 1925 dealt blow to the spread of the movement in the US. In the Muslim world, there is debate over the relevance of the term in describing the activities of Islamist movements. …
Read full abstract