Replication-dependent Histone Genes Research Articles

Single-cell nascent RNA sequencing unveils coordinated global transcription

Transcription is the primary regulatory step in gene expression. Divergent transcription initiation from promoters and enhancers produces stable RNAs from genes and unstable RNAs from enhancers1,2. Nascent RNA capture and sequencing assays simultaneously measure gene and enhancer activity in cell populations3. However, fundamental questions about the temporal regulation of transcription and enhancer–gene coordination remain unanswered, primarily because of the absence of a single-cell perspective on active transcription. In this study, we present scGRO–seq—a new single-cell nascent RNA sequencing assay that uses click chemistry—and unveil coordinated transcription throughout the genome. We demonstrate the episodic nature of transcription and the co-transcription of functionally related genes. scGRO–seq can estimate burst size and frequency by directly quantifying transcribing RNA polymerases in individual cells and can leverage replication-dependent non-polyadenylated histone gene transcription to elucidate cell cycle dynamics. The single-nucleotide spatial and temporal resolution of scGRO–seq enables the identification of networks of enhancers and genes. Our results suggest that the bursting of transcription at super-enhancers precedes bursting from associated genes. By imparting insights into the dynamic nature of global transcription and the origin and propagation of transcription signals, we demonstrate the ability of scGRO–seq to investigate the mechanisms of transcription regulation and the role of enhancers in gene expression.

A bioinformatics screen reveals hox and chromatin remodeling factors at the Drosophila histone locus

BackgroundCells orchestrate histone biogenesis with strict temporal and quantitative control. To efficiently regulate histone biogenesis, the repetitive Drosophila melanogaster replication-dependent histone genes are arrayed and clustered at a single locus. Regulatory factors concentrate in a nuclear body known as the histone locus body (HLB), which forms around the locus. Historically, HLB factors are largely discovered by chance, and few are known to interact directly with DNA. It is therefore unclear how the histone genes are specifically targeted for unique and coordinated regulation.ResultsTo expand the list of known HLB factors, we performed a candidate-based screen by mapping 30 publicly available ChIP datasets of 27 unique factors to the Drosophila histone gene array. We identified novel transcription factor candidates, including the Drosophila Hox proteins Ultrabithorax (Ubx), Abdominal-A (Abd-A), and Abdominal-B (Abd-B), suggesting a new pathway for these factors in influencing body plan morphogenesis. Additionally, we identified six other factors that target the histone gene array: JIL-1, hormone-like receptor 78 (Hr78), the long isoform of female sterile homeotic (1) (fs(1)h) as well as the general transcription factors TBP associated factor 1 (TAF-1), Transcription Factor IIB (TFIIB), and Transcription Factor IIF (TFIIF).ConclusionsOur foundational screen provides several candidates for future studies into factors that may influence histone biogenesis. Further, our study emphasizes the powerful reservoir of publicly available datasets, which can be mined as a primary screening technique.

Coordinated expression of replication-dependent histone genes from multiple loci promotes histone homeostasis in Drosophila.

Production of large amounts of histone proteins during S phase is critical for proper chromatin formation and genome integrity. This process is achieved in part by the presence of multiple copies of replication dependent (RD) histone genes that occur in one or more clusters in metazoan genomes. In addition, RD histone gene clusters are associated with a specialized nuclear body, the histone locus body (HLB), which facilitates efficient transcription and 3' end-processing of RD histone mRNA. How all five RD histone genes within these clusters are coordinately regulated such that neither too few nor too many histones are produced, a process referred to as histone homeostasis, is not fully understood. Here, we explored the mechanisms of coordinate regulation between multiple RD histone loci in Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila virilis. We provide evidence for functional competition between endogenous and ectopic transgenic histone arrays located at different chromosomal locations in D. melanogaster that helps maintain proper histone mRNA levels. Consistent with this model, in both species we found that individual histone gene arrays can independently assemble an HLB that results in active histone transcription. Our findings suggest a role for HLB assembly in coordinating RD histone gene expression to maintain histone homeostasis.

MED26-containing Mediator may orchestrate multiple transcription processes through organization of nuclear bodies.

Mediator is a coregulatory complex that plays essential roles in multiple processes of transcription regulation. One of the human Mediator subunits, MED26, has a role in recruitment of the super elongation complex (SEC) to polyadenylated genes and little elongation complex (LEC) to non-polyadenylated genes, including small nuclear RNAs (snRNAs) and replication-dependent histone (RDH) genes. MED26-containing Mediator plays a role in 3' Pol II pausing at the proximal region of transcript end sites in RDH genes through recruitment of Cajal bodies (CBs) to histone locus bodies (HLBs). This finding suggests that Mediator is involved in the association of CBs with HLBs to facilitate 3' Pol II pausing and subsequent 3'-end processing by supplying 3'-end processing factors from CBs. Thus, we argue the possibility that Mediator is involved in the organization of nuclear bodies to orchestrate multiple processes of gene transcription.

FUS regulates a subset of snoRNA expression and modulates the level of rRNA modifications

FUS is a multifunctional protein involved in many aspects of RNA metabolism, including transcription, splicing, translation, miRNA processing, and replication-dependent histone gene expression. In this work, we show that FUS depletion results in the differential expression of numerous small nucleolar RNAs (snoRNAs) that guide 2’-O methylation (2’-O-Me) and pseudouridylation of specific positions in ribosomal RNAs (rRNAs) and small nuclear RNAs (snRNAs). Using RiboMeth-seq and HydraPsiSeq for the profiling of 2’-O-Me and pseudouridylation status of rRNA species, we demonstrated considerable hypermodification at several sites in HEK293T and SH-SY5Y cells with FUS knockout (FUS KO) compared to wild-type cells. We observed a similar direction of changes in rRNA modification in differentiated SH-SY5Y cells with the FUS mutation (R495X) related to the severe disease phenotype of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Furthermore, the pattern of modification of some rRNA positions was correlated with the abundance of corresponding guide snoRNAs in FUS KO and FUS R495X cells. Our findings reveal a new role for FUS in modulating the modification pattern of rRNA molecules, that in turn might generate ribosome heterogeneity and constitute a fine-tuning mechanism for translation efficiency/fidelity. Therefore, we suggest that increased levels of 2’-O-Me and pseudouridylation at particular positions in rRNAs from cells with the ALS-linked FUS mutation may represent a possible new translation-related mechanism that underlies disease development and progression.

HMGA1 Regulates the Expression of Replication-Dependent Histone Genes and Cell-Cycle in Breast Cancer Cells.

Breast cancer (BC) is the primary cause of cancer mortality in women and the triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is the most aggressive subtype characterized by poor differentiation and high proliferative properties. High mobility group A1 (HMGA1) is an oncogenic factor involved in the onset and progression of the neoplastic transformation in BC. Here, we unraveled that the replication-dependent-histone (RD-HIST) gene expression is enriched in BC tissues and correlates with HMGA1 expression. We explored the role of HMGA1 in modulating the RD-HIST genes expression in TNBC cells and show that MDA-MB-231 cells, depleted of HMGA1, express low levels of core histones. We show that HMGA1 participates in the activation of the HIST1H4H promoter and that it interacts with the nuclear protein of the ataxia-telangiectasia mutated locus (NPAT), the coordinator of the transcription of the RD-HIST genes. Moreover, we demonstrate that HMGA1 silencing increases the percentage of cells in G0/G1 phase both in TNBC and epirubicin resistant TNBC cells. Moreover, HMGA1 silencing causes an increase in epirubicin IC50 both in parental and epirubicin resistant cells thus suggesting that targeting HMGA1 could affect the efficacy of epirubicin treatment.

The 3′ Pol II pausing at replication-dependent histone genes is regulated by Mediator through Cajal bodies’ association with histone locus bodies

Non-polyadenylated mRNAs of replication-dependent histones (RDHs) are synthesized by RNA polymerase II (Pol II) at histone locus bodies (HLBs). HLBs frequently associate with Cajal bodies (CBs), in which 3′-end processing factors for RDH genes are enriched; however, this association’s role in transcription termination of RDH genes remains unclear. Here, we show that Pol II pauses immediately upstream of transcript end sites of RDH genes and Mediator plays a role in this Pol II pausing through CBs’ association with HLBs. Disruption of the Mediator docking site for Little elongation complex (LEC)–Cap binding complex (CBC)–Negative elongation factor (NELF), components of CBs, interferes with CBs’ association with HLBs and 3′ Pol II pausing, resulting in increased aberrant unprocessed RDH gene transcripts. Our findings suggest Mediator’s involvement in CBs’ association with HLBs to facilitate 3′ Pol II pausing and subsequent 3′-end processing of RDH genes by supplying 3′-end processing factors.

SUMO Regulates Histone mRNA Processing and Polyadenylation

Replication‐dependent histone genes encode the only non‐polyadenylated mRNAs in mammals. Histone pre‐mRNAs, which do not contain introns, therefore require only one processing step that involves 3’ end recognition and cleavage. Both histone gene expression and pre‐mRNA processing take place in specialized nuclear organelles known as histone locus bodies. Recent studies have revealed that polyadenylation of histone mRNAs does occur, however, under specific physiological conditions. These include during normal terminal cellular differentiation, tumorigenesis, and in disease patients with Aicardi–Goutières syndrome. Despite these links between polyadenylation of histone mRNAs, human physiology, and disease, the triggers, the mechanisms, and the consequences of histone mRNA polyadenylation remain poorly defined. In recent studies of small ubiquitin‐related modifier (SUMO) knockout cell lines, we have obtained evidence that SUMO1 and SUMO2 play roles in regulating histone pre‐mRNA 3’ end processing and polyadenylation. This evidence includes alterations in histone locus body size and structure in SUMO1 and SUMO2 knockout cells, as well as mislocalization of key pre‐mRNA processing factors required for normal processing. Collectively, our findings provide new insights into control of histone pre‐mRNA processing that involves posttranslational protein modifications by SUMO1 and SUMO2.

Replication-dependent histone biosynthesis is coupled to cell-cycle commitment

The current model of replication-dependent (RD) histone biosynthesis posits that RD histone gene expression is coupled to DNA replication, occurring only in S phase of the cell cycle once DNA synthesis has begun. However, several key factors in the RD histone biosynthesis pathway are up-regulated by E2F or phosphorylated by CDK2, suggesting these processes may instead begin much earlier, at the point of cell-cycle commitment. In this study, we use both fixed- and live-cell imaging of human cells to address this question, revealing a hybrid model in which RD histone biosynthesis is first initiated in G1, followed by a strong increase in histone production in S phase of the cell cycle. This suggests a mechanism by which cells that have committed to the cell cycle build up an initial small pool of RD histones to be available for the start of DNA replication, before producing most of the necessary histones required in S phase. Thus, a clear distinction exists at completion of mitosis between cells that are born with the intention of proceeding through the cell cycle and replicating their DNA and cells that have chosen to exit the cell cycle and have no immediate need for histone synthesis.

ALS-linked FUS mutants affect the localization of U7 snRNP and replication-dependent histone gene expression in human cells

Genes encoding replication-dependent histones lack introns, and the mRNAs produced are a unique class of RNA polymerase II transcripts in eukaryotic cells that do not end in a polyadenylated tail. Mature mRNAs are thus formed by a single endonucleolytic cleavage that releases the pre-mRNA from the DNA and is the only processing event necessary. U7 snRNP is one of the key factors that determines the cleavage site within the 3ʹUTR of replication-dependent histone pre-mRNAs. We have previously showed that the FUS protein interacts with U7 snRNA/snRNP and regulates the expression of histone genes by stimulating transcription and 3ʹ end maturation. Mutations in the FUS gene first identified in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) lead to the accumulation of the FUS protein in cytoplasmic inclusions. Here, we report that mutations in FUS lead to disruption of the transcriptional activity of FUS and mislocalization of U7 snRNA/snRNP in cytoplasmic aggregates in cellular models and primary neurons. As a consequence, decreased transcriptional efficiency and aberrant 3ʹ end processing of histone pre-mRNAs were observed. This study highlights for the first time the deregulation of replication-dependent histone gene expression and its involvement in ALS.

Dual RNA 3\u2019-end processing of H2A.X messenger RNA maintains DNA damage repair throughout the cell cycle

Phosphorylated H2A.X is a critical chromatin marker of DNA damage repair (DDR) in higher eukaryotes. However, H2A.X gene expression remains relatively uncharacterised. Replication-dependent (RD) histone genes generate poly(A)- mRNA encoding new histones to package DNA during replication. In contrast, replication-independent (RI) histone genes synthesise poly(A)+ mRNA throughout the cell cycle, translated into histone variants that confer specific epigenetic patterns on chromatin. Remarkably H2AFX, encoding H2A.X, is a hybrid histone gene, generating both poly(A)+ and poly(A)- mRNA isoforms. Here we report that the selective removal of either mRNA isoform reveals different effects in different cell types. In some cells, RD H2A.X poly(A)- mRNA generates sufficient histone for deposition onto DDR associated chromatin. In contrast, cells making predominantly poly(A)+ mRNA require this isoform for de novo H2A.X synthesis, required for efficient DDR. This highlights the importance of differential H2A.X mRNA 3’-end processing in the maintenance of effective DDR.

CDK11 is required for transcription of replication-dependent histone genes

Replication-dependent histones (RDH) are required for packaging of newly synthetized DNA into nucleosomes during S-phase when their expression is highly upregulated. However, the mechanisms of this upregulation in metazoan cells remain poorly understood. Using iCLIP and ChIP-seq, we found that human cyclin-dependent kinase 11 (CDK11) associates with RNA and chromatin of RDH genes primarily in the S-phase. Moreover, its N-terminal region binds FLASH, RDH-specific 3´end processing factor, which keeps the kinase on the chromatin. CDK11 phosphorylates serine 2 (Ser2) of the C-terminal domain (CTD) of RNA polymerase II (RNAPII), which is initiated at the middle of RDH genes and is required for further RNAPII elongation and 3´end processing. CDK11 depletion leads to decreased number of cells in S-phase, likely due to the function of CDK11 in RDH gene expression. Thus, the reliance of RDH expression on CDK11 could explain why CDK11 is essential for growth of many cancers.

The role of Mediator and Little Elongation Complex in transcription termination

Mediator is a coregulatory complex that regulates transcription of Pol II-dependent genes. Previously, we showed that human Mediator subunit MED26 plays a role in the recruitment of Super Elongation Complex (SEC) or Little Elongation Complex (LEC) to regulate the expression of certain genes. MED26 plays a role in recruiting SEC to protein-coding genes including c-myc and LEC to small nuclear RNA (snRNA) genes. However, how MED26 engages SEC or LEC to regulate distinct genes is unclear. Here, we provide evidence that MED26 recruits LEC to modulate transcription termination of non-polyadenylated transcripts including snRNAs and mRNAs encoding replication-dependent histone (RDH) at Cajal bodies. Our findings indicate that LEC recruited by MED26 promotes efficient transcription termination by Pol II through interaction with CBC-ARS2 and NELF/DSIF, and promotes 3′ end processing by enhancing recruitment of Integrator or Heat Labile Factor to snRNA or RDH genes, respectively.

Histone H2B Ubiquitylation Regulates Histone Gene Expression by Suppressing Antisense Transcription in Fission Yeast.

Histone H2B monoubiquitylation (H2Bub1) is tightly linked to RNA polymeraseII transcription elongation, and is also directly implicated in DNA replication and repair. Loss of H2Bub1 is associated with defects in cell cycle progression, but how these are related to its various functions, and the underlying mechanisms involved, is not understood. Here we describe a role for H2Bub1 in the regulation of replication-dependent histone genes in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe H2Bub1 activates histone genes indirectly by suppressing antisense transcription of ams2+ -a gene encoding a GATA-type transcription factor that activates histone genes and is required for assembly of centromeric chromatin. Mutants lacking the ubiquitylation site in H2B or the H2B-specific E3 ubiquitin ligase Brl2 had elevated levels of ams2+ antisense transcripts and reduced Ams2 protein levels. These defects were reversed upon inhibition of Cdk9-an ortholog of the kinase component of positive transcription elongation factor b (P-TEFb)-indicating that they likely resulted from aberrant transcription elongation. Reduced Cdk9 activity also partially rescued chromosome segregation phenotypes of H2Bub1 mutants. In a genome-wide analysis, loss of H2Bub1 led to increased antisense transcripts at over 500 protein-coding genes in H2Bub1 mutants; for a subset of these, including several genes involved in chromosome segregation and chromatin assembly, antisense derepression was Cdk9-dependent. Our results highlight antisense suppression as a key feature of cell cycle-dependent gene regulation by H2Bub1, and suggest that aberrant transcription elongation may underlie the effects of H2Bub1 loss on cell cycle progression.

Abstract 3648: Protein phosphatase 1 regulatory subunit 1A regulates cell cycle progression in Ewing sarcoma

Abstract Ewing sarcoma (ES) is a highly malignant pediatric bone and soft tissue tumor characterized by the expression of chimeric fusions of EWS and ETS family transcription factors, mostly EWS/FLI, as a consequence of chromosomal translocation. The dominant role of EWS/FLI in ES indicates that insights into the biology of this aberrant transcription factor and its downstream targets in ES initiation and progression could lead to the discovery of novel therapeutic strategies. We recently identified protein phosphatase 1 regulatory subunit 1A (PPP1R1A), a potent protein phosphatase 1 (PP1) inhibitor, as one of the core EWS/FLI targets and a potential specific therapeutic target for primary and metastatic ES. Small molecule compound inhibition of PPP1R1A and the associated PKA/PPP1R1A/PP1 signaling pathway impaired tumor growth and metastasis in ES xenograft mouse model. In the current study, we seek to identify the underlying mechanisms of PPP1R1A mediated tumorigenesis and metastasis and define additional role of PPP1R1A in ES pathogenesis to facilitate discovery of additional therapeutic targets. We performed shRNA induced knockdown (iR1A) and CRISPR knockout (R1A-KO) of PPP1R1A in ES cells and found that iR1A and R1A-KO cells proliferated much slower than the control cells. Cell cycle analysis showed that PPP1R1A depleted cells were arrested in G1 to S phase transition which could be rescued by re-expression of 35D, a constitutively active PPP1R1A. We found that Rb, whose phosphorylation releases cell cycle arrest in G1 phase, was hypo-phosphorylated upon PPP1R1A knockdown and hyper-phosphorylated after 35D rescue. Furthermore, depletion of PPP1R1A increased expression levels of cell cycle inhibitors p21 and p27, but not other G1 phase associated proteins. Results from RNA-seq and qRT-PCR analysis showed that PPP1R1A knockdown decreased the level of total mRNA but increased that of poly-adenylated mRNA of a subset of replication-dependent histone genes, suggesting a compensation mechanism of the loss of normal pre-mRNA processing of the histone genes in G1-arrested PPP1R1A knockdown cells. Our findings demonstrate that PPP1R1A promotes cell cycle progression through G1 to S phase by down-regulating cell cycle inhibitors p21 and p27 which leads to Rb hyper-phosphorylation and de-repression of cell cycle. Since PPP1R1A is specifically highly expressed in ES but not its putative cell of origin, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), our results indicate that PPP1R1A serves as an ES specific cell cycle modulator. Recently, IGF-1R inhibitors have shown synergistic effect with cell cycle modulators such as CDK4/6 inhibitors. Thus, combination of PPP1R1A inhibition with IGF-1R inhibitor may be explored for synergistic specific and effective tumor control in ES. Further studies for identification of the molecular mechanisms by which PPP1R1A regulates p21 and p27 may reveal more therapeutic targets for ES treatment. Citation Format: Wen Luo, Marcela Laukova, Sarah Phillips, Janet Ayello, Mitchell S. Cairo. Protein phosphatase 1 regulatory subunit 1A regulates cell cycle progression in Ewing sarcoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 3648.

Probing the Function of Metazoan Histones with a Systematic Library of H3 and H4 Mutants

Replication-dependent histone genes often reside in tandemly arrayed gene clusters, hindering systematic loss-of-function analyses. Here, we used CRISPR/Cas9 and the attP/attB double-integration system to alter numbers and sequences of histone genes in their original genomic context in Drosophila melanogaster. As few as 8 copies of the histone gene unit supported embryo development and adult viability, whereas flies with 20 copies were indistinguishable from wild-types. By hierarchical assembly, 40 alanine-substitution mutations (covering all known modified residues in histones H3 and H4) were introduced and characterized. Mutations at multiple residues compromised viability, fertility, and DNA-damage responses. In particular, H4K16 was necessary for expression of male X-linked genes, male viability, and maintenance of ovarian germline stem cells, whereas H3K27 was essential for late embryogenesis. Simplified mosaic analysis showed that H3R26 is required for H3K27 trimethylation. We have developed a powerful strategy and valuable reagents to systematically probe histone functions in D.melanogaster.

Replication-dependent histone isoforms: a new source of complexity in chromatin structure and function.

Replication-dependent histones are expressed in a cell cycle regulated manner and supply the histones necessary to support DNA replication. In mammals, the replication-dependent histones are encoded by a family of genes that are located in several clusters. In humans, these include 16 genes for histone H2A, 22 genes for histone H2B, 14 genes for histone H3, 14 genes for histone H4 and 6 genes for histone H1. While the proteins encoded by these genes are highly similar, they are not identical. For many years, these genes were thought to encode functionally equivalent histone proteins. However, several lines of evidence have emerged that suggest that the replication-dependent histone genes can have specific functions and may constitute a novel layer of chromatin regulation. This Survey and Summary reviews the literature on replication-dependent histone isoforms and discusses potential mechanisms by which the small variations in primary sequence between the isoforms can alter chromatin function. In addition, we summarize the wealth of data implicating altered regulation of histone isoform expression in cancer.

Positive cofactor 4 (PC4) contributes to the regulation of replication-dependent canonical histone gene expression

BackgroundCore canonical histones are required in the S phase of the cell cycle to pack newly synthetized DNA, therefore the expression of their genes is highly activated during DNA replication. In mammalian cells, this increment is achieved by both enhanced transcription and 3′ end processing. In this paper, we described positive cofactor 4 (PC4) as a protein that contributes to the regulation of replication-dependent histone gene expression.ResultsWe showed that PC4 influences RNA polymerase II recruitment to histone gene loci in a cell cycle-dependent manner. The most important effect was observed in S phase where PC4 knockdown leads to the elevated level of RNA polymerase II on histone genes, which corresponds to the increased total level of those gene transcripts. The opposite effect was caused by PC4 overexpression. Moreover, we found that PC4 has a negative effect on the unique 3′ end processing of histone pre-mRNAs that can be based on the interaction of PC4 with U7 snRNP and CstF64. Interestingly, this effect does not depend on the cell cycle.ConclusionsWe conclude that PC4 might repress RNA polymerase II recruitment and transcription of replication-dependent histone genes in order to maintain the very delicate balance between histone gene expression and DNA synthesis. It guards the cell from excess of histones in S phase. Moreover, PC4 might promote the interaction of cleavage and polyadenylation complex with histone pre-mRNAs, that might impede with the recruitment of histone cleavage complex. This in turn decreases the 3′ end processing efficiency of histone gene transcripts.

Abstract 356: Polyadenyaltion of canonical histone mRNA: A potential mechanism of arsenic-induced carcinogenesis

Abstract Naturally occurring inorganic arsenic has been identified as a prominent causal agent in lung, bladder, liver, and prostate cancers. Although arsenic (As) has long been known to induce carcinogenicity via epigenetic mechanisms, alteration in histone gene expression has not been explored. The replication-dependent histone genes (also known as canonical histone genes) are the only genes found in multicellular organisms whose messenger RNA (mRNA) does not terminate with a poly(A) tail at the 3' end. Instead, they contain a conserved 26-nucleotide sequence that forms a stem-loop structure, and serves as the binding site for the Stem-loop binding protein (SLBP). SLBP is critical for canonical histone pre-mRNA processing and histone mRNA translation. Our previous studies demonstrated that arsenic exposure increases polyadenylation of histone H3.1 mRNA (a canonical histone H3) and its presence outside of S phase of the cell cycle due to the loss of SLBP protein and mRNA. Here we report that ectopic expression of polyadenylated H3.1 mRNA induces cell transformation and that the transformed cells are able to form tumors in athymic nude mice. These carcinogenic effects are dependent on the level of polyadenylation of canonical H3.1 mRNA. Notably, transfection of H3.1 cDNA with a stem-loop sequence in the front of the poly(A) signal generates less polyadenylated H3.1 mRNA and thereby attenuates cell transformation. Furthermore, the increase in polyadenylated H3.1 mRNA is able to antagonize histone H3.3 (a non-canonical variant of H3) in the promoter of active genes and perturb expression of cancer-related genes. In addition transfection of H3.1 with a poly(A) tail causes mitotic block in the cell cycle as well as chromosome instability. Furthermore, acute arsenic exposure by inhalation in mice results in the loss of SLBP and gain of polyadenylated H3.1 mRNA in lung tissues. These results suggest that the polyadenylation of canonical histone mRNAs induce by Arsenic is very disruptive to cellular genomic integrity and contributes to development of human cancers. Citation Format: Qiao Yi Chen, Danqi Chen, Thomas Kluz, Feng Wu, Yusha Zhu, Thomas Des Marais, Jinquan Li, Xiaoru Zhang, Ashley Jordan, Hong Sun, Chunyuan Jin, Max Costa. Polyadenyaltion of canonical histone mRNA: A potential mechanism of arsenic-induced carcinogenesis [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 356.

Probing the Function of Metazoan Histones with a Systematic Library of H3 and H4 Mutants

Replication-dependent histone genes often reside in tandemly arrayed gene clusters, hindering systematic loss-of function analyses. Here we used CRISPR/Cas9 and the attP/attB double-integration system to alter the numbers and sequences of the histone genes in their original genomic context in Drosophila. As few as 8 copies of histone gene suffices to support embryo development and adult viability, whereas flies with 20 copies are indistinguishable from WT flies. Using a hierarchical assembly method, 40 alanine substitution mutations, covering all known modified residues on histone H3 and H4, were introduced and characterized. Mutations at multiple residues compromise viability, fertility, and DNA damage responses. In particular, H4K16 is necessary for expression of male X-linked genes, male viability and maintenance of ovarian germline stem cells, whereas H3K27 is essential for late embryogenesis. Finally, using simplified mosaic analysis, we found that H3R26 is required for H3K27 trimethylation. Taken together, we have developed a powerful strategy and valuable reagents for systematically probing histone functions in the fly.