Repair Of Aortic Arch Pathology Research Articles

Current techniques of repair of aortic arch pathologies and the role of the aortic team.

The treatment of aortic arch pathologies is becoming progressively more complex and multidisciplinary. Despite progresses in open surgical techniques, the high rate of surgical morbidity and mortality, especially in frail and elderly patients, has led to the development of alternative treatment options to conventional open surgery such as hybrid and endovascular procedures. Our purpose is to summarize the advantages and disadvantages of the different approaches and investigate the role of a dedicated aortic team in the choice of the most appropriate treatment for each patient.

Outcomes of Clampless Real Chimney Technique with Dacron Graft and Sleeve Banding of the Ascending Aorta for Total Debranching Endovascular Arch Repair

Background: Hybrid aortic arch repair with debranching of the supra-aortic vessels carries a high risk of cerebral infarction and fatal complications associated with side clamping of the ascending aorta. A previous study had reported the “real chimney” technique, a novel method for clamp-free total debranching thoracic endovascular aortic repair with the ascending aortic sleeve banding with dacron. In this study, we aim to build upon this foundation by presenting our experience with the early and midterm outcomes of this technique. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 61 consecutive older adult patients with aortic arch pathologies and a high risk of open repair who underwent total debranching thoracic endovascular aortic repair using the real chimney technique at our institution between January 2014 and June 2022. This technique was used to anastomose the ascending aorta with the main trunk of the triple-branched prosthetic graft. Results: The mean patient age was 75.1 years, and 54% of patients were transferred from medical facilities with cardiothoracic surgery departments. The comorbidities included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (49.2%), chronic kidney disease (63.9%), coronary artery disease (27.9%), and history of stroke (31.1%). No 30-day mortality was observed. Complications included postoperative renal failure requiring permanent hemodialysis (4; 6.6%), stroke (modified Rankin scale score: ≥2 in 5; 8.2%), permanent paraplegia (1; 1.6%), and permanent paraparesis (4; 6.6%). The median follow-up period was 40.5±28.5 months. The postoperative survival rates at 5 years were 66.8%. No patients experienced complications associated with the aorta or anastomosis site; only 1 patient required an additional procedure for stenosis of the anastomosis site (midterm). An aneurysmal diameter reduction of ≥3 mm was observed in 37 cases (60.7%), and the mean aneurysmal diameter reduction was 5.3 mm. Conclusions: The postoperative outcome of total debranching thoracic endovascular aortic arch repair is not only acceptable but also promising, particularly in patients at high risk of open repair. Clinical Impact Our novel real chimney technique for total debranching thoracic endovascular aortic repair of aortic arch pathologies in patients who were at a high-risk for open repair resulted in no 30-day mortality and no complications related to the aorta or the real chimney anastomosis site. The real chimney technique is effective for managing aortic arch pathologies and enables less invasive total debranching thoracic endovascular aortic arch repair without the need for extracorporeal circulation and clamping of the ascending aorta

Incidence and Prognostic Associations of Early Postoperative Stroke and Death Among Patients Undergoing Inner Branched Thoracic Endovascular Repair of Aortic Arch Pathologies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

The objective of this systematic review was to assess the incidences and associations of early postoperative stroke and death among patients undergoing inner branched thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) of arch pathologies. Electronic bibliographic sources (PUBMED, EMBASE, and CENTRAL) were searched up to February 2022 using a combination of thesaurus and free-text terms to identify the studies using branched TEVAR to treat aortic arch disease. The systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. All observational studies investigating the prognosis of inner branched TEVAR in the treatment of aortic arch pathologies were included. Independent extraction of articles was performed by two authors using predefined data fields, including study quality indications. All pooled analyses were based on a random-effects or fixed model according to the heterogeneity. A total of 23 case series totaling 532 participants were included after screening. After optimized selection (largest sample size, most detailed data, lowest risk of bias) from the overlapping data, 12 studies with 289 participants were included in data synthesis. The pooled incidence of 30-day postoperative stroke was 10.6% (95% CI 7.0%-14.2%; p=.41, I2=3%). Pooled 30-day mortality was 4.9% (95% CI 2.0%-7.8%; p=.38, I2=7%). Combined early stroke/death was 15.7% (95% CI 11.2%-20.3%; p=.30, I2=15%). Subgroup analyses of 11 studies (without data missing) showed that a higher incidence of 30-day postoperative stroke was found in studies with aged participants (age≥71.3 years, p=.010), the higher percentage of COPD (≥30%, p= .011) and non-dissection-related pathologies (≥60.8%, p=.011). The higher 30-day postoperative mortality was found in studies with a high percentage of previous coronary artery disease (≥34.5%, p=.023). This review demonstrated that there were acceptable rates of 30-day postoperative stroke and death among patients undergoing inner branched TEVAR. It is strongly necessary to perform a rigorous risk assessment of aortic plaque embolism and coronary artery disease when the surgical plan of the inner branched TEVAR is determined. Treatment arch pathologies with inner branched TEVAR provides acceptable early stroke rate and mortality. Aortic pathology mainly influenced the early stroke rate, and early recognizing high-risk patients for aortic plaque embolism is of supreme importance for reducing the early stroke rate. In addition, the history of coronary artery disease was strongly associated with early mortality, and attention should be paid to the coronary artery assessment and perioperative management of these patients.

Outcomes of aortic arch repair using the frozen elephant trunk technique: analysis of a Scandinavian center's results over 14 years.

The frozen elephant trunk (FET) technique enables repair of aortic arch pathology, with possibility for endovascular treatment of distal thoracic aortic disease. We aimed to study outcomes of FET repair of complex aortic arch disease at a Scandinavian tertiary referral center. All patients who underwent FET repair of the aortic arch 2006-2020 were included. Survival, complication and reintervention rate, and aortic remodeling were analyzed. Fifty patients were included: 23 complex thoracic aortic aneurysms involving the aortic arch (TAA), 19 with chronic aortic dissections (CAD) (16 Stanford type A, 3 type B) and 8 acute aortic dissections (AAD) (7 Stanford type A, 1 type B). Thirty-day mortality was: TAA=22% (N.=5), CAD=5% (N.=1), AAD=37% (N.=3). Rate of disabling stroke: TAA=22% (N.=5), CAD=5% (N.=1), AAD=25% (N.=2). Rate of permanent spinal cord injury: TAA=9% (N.=2), CAD=5% (N.=1), AAD=0%. 5-year survival: TAA=53%, CAD=83%, AAD=63%. 5-year reintervention-free survival was TAA=83% and CAD=36%. There were no reinterventions in the AAD group. 13/19 (68%) of CAD patients underwent distal stent graft extension during follow-up. On last CT follow-up (median 32 months), 78% of CAD had false lumen thrombosis along the stent graft and 11% in the abdominal aorta. In thoracic aorta there was a mean 64% expansion (P<0.001) of true and 39% reduction (P=0.007) of false lumen diameter. In abdominal aorta, both true and false lumen expanded. Despite the advantages of the FET technique, repair of extensive aortic arch disease remains associated with high rates of mortality and major neurologic complications. FET repair of CAD induces favorable remodeling in the thoracic aorta.

Technical tips and clinical experience with the Cook Triple inner arch branch stent-graft.

Open surgical repair remains the gold standard for treatment for aortic arch diseases, but these operations can be associated with wide heterogeneity in outcomes and significant morbidity and mortality, particularly in elderly patients with severe comorbidities or those who had prior arch procedures via median sternotomy. Endovascular repair has been introduced as a less invasive alternative to reduce morbidity and mortality associated with open surgical repair. The technique evolved with new device designs using up to three inner branches for incorporation of the supra-aortic trunks. This manuscript summarizes technical tips and clinical experience with the triple inner arch branch stent graft for total endovascular repair of aortic arch pathologies.

Mortality and neurologic complications after repair of aortic arch pathology with elephant trunk procedures: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Frozen elephant trunk (FET) technique was developed as an alternative to the conventional elephant trunk (cET) procedure for the repair of complex aortic arch pathology. However, short term results between these different procedures are sparsely described. This systematic review with meta-analysis aimed to compare short term outcomes between FET and cET in the repair of aortic arch pathology. PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus electronic databases were searched for studies comparing performance of FET and cET procedures in patients with aortic arch pathology. The primary outcome of interest was early mortality, defined as 30-day or in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were stroke, and spinal cord ischemia (SCI). Meta-analysis utilizing the random-effects model was performed using Review Manager (RevMan) software, version 5.4. Ten studies, comprising 1481 patients with aortic arch pathology, were included. Meta-analysis demonstrated statistically significant reduction of early mortality (odds ratio [OR], 0.63; 95% CI, 0.41-0.97) in the FET group. For neurologic outcomes, no significant differences were noted in stroke risk between both groups (OR, 1.21; 95% CI, 0.83-1.75), but an increased risk of SCI was present in FET patients (OR, 2.07; 95% CI, 1.05-4.10). FET appears to be associated with a significant lower early mortality, at costs of greater SCI risk. Larger studies are needed to provide confident recommendations towards preferential use of either procedure.

Can regional cerebral oxygen saturation monitoring during circulatory arrest time predict postoperative neurological dysfunction in patients undergoing surgical pulmonary thromboendarterectomy? Useful index for short- and long-term outcomes.

A hypothermic circulatory arrest is usually used to correct thoracic aorta pathologies. The emergency treatment of acute type A aortic dissection and elective repair of aortic arch pathologies are the most common indications for using hypothermic circulatory arrest. A hypothermic circulatory arrest can also be used for surgical pulmonary thromboendarterectomy in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Intervals with total circulatory arrest offer a clear surgical field for thrombus and emboli removal from the pulmonary artery branches. The price to pay for intermittent circulatory arrest during pulmonary thromboendarterectomy is postoperative neurological dysfunction due to brain hypothermia and hypoperfusion. A noninvasive method for cerebral monitoring during cardiac surgery is real-time regional cerebral oxygen saturation (rSO2 ). Liu et al. report that continuous monitoring of rSO2 during surgical pulmonary thromboendarterectomy may reduce the long cerebral hypoperfusion time and prevent postoperative neurological dysfunction.

Aortic Dissection: Branched, Fenestrated, and Parallel Aortic Stent Grafts in the Ascending Aorta and Arch

Open surgical repair of dissections and post-dissection degenerative aneurysms involving the ascending thoracic aorta and aortic arch, whether in the acute or post-repair state, is associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality. Recent advancements in minimally invasive endovascular techniques have expanded the role of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for dissections and dissection-related arch pathologies. Image-guided endovascular techniques, such as in situ fenestrated grafts, chimney and/or periscope grafts, along with newly developed commercially available branched aortic devices, have allowed for an increasing number of high-risk operative candidates to undergo definitive repair of aortic arch pathology who otherwise would have been destined for non-operative management. This paper reviews the data, pre-procedural planning, and technical considerations for complex TEVAR techniques for ascending and aortic arch dissections and dissection-related aneurysms.

Midterm Results of Retrograde In Situ Needle Fenestration During Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair of Aortic Arch Pathologies

Purpose: To evaluate the safety and feasibility of the in situ needle fenestration (ISNF) technique for reconstruction of the left subclavian artery (LSA) during thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) of complicated aortic arch pathologies. Materials and Methods: A retrospective review was conducted from January 2014 to December 2019 of 50 patients (mean age 60.2±11.1; 45 men) who underwent ISNF to revascularize the LSA during TEVAR. Twenty-one of the patients also required revascularization of the left common carotid artery (LCCA; n=19) and innominate artery (IA; n=2) using physician-modified in vitro fenestration. Overall, 73 supra-aortic branches were targeted for revascularization. Results: ISNF was successful in 48 patients (96%); one LSA could not be stented and a tortuous LSA prevented the needle from fenestrating the graft. No perioperative major adverse event occurred. There were no type I and 4 type III endoleaks (8%), 3 of which occurred among the first 20 cases. Types II and IV endoleaks were found in 3 (6%) and 6 (12%) cases, respectively; all disappeared during a median follow-up of 15 months (range 3–66). One death (2%) occurred within 12 months due to cerebral hemorrhage. Two patients (4%) required open reinterventions at 6 and 62 months. Conclusion: ISNF for revascularization of the LSA during TEVAR seems to be feasible with acceptable midterm outcomes. The learning curve and evolving patient selection criteria affected technical success, complications, and the need for reinterventions. Long-term durability requires further evaluation.

Association of aberrant subclavian arteries with aortic pathology and proposed classification system

ObjectiveAberrant subclavian artery (aSCA) is a rare anatomic variant whose association with other aortic branch variations and aortic pathology has yet to be established. Knowledge of such an association could be relevant to recommendations for screening and awareness as associated variations are important for operative planning. We describe the incidence of aSCA variations, its association with aortic pathology, and a proposed classification system. MethodsThe thoracic cross-sectional imaging database at Keck Hospital of the University of Southern California from 2006 to 2018 was queried for presence of aSCA. Studies were evaluated for aSCA laterality, variant anatomy, and aortic and branch vessel disease. Medical records were reviewed for associated symptoms and diagnoses. The primary outcome was association of aSCA with aortic pathology (aneurysm or dissection). Secondary outcomes were comparison of right and left aSCA, comparison between the sexes, and creation of a proposed classification system. ResultsOf 98,580 axial imaging studies, 810 studies (0.82%) were identified with aSCA in 312 unique patients. Right aSCA made up the majority of cases (90.1%). All aSCAs had a retroesophageal course. Kommerell’s diverticulum (KD) was present in 184 (59%) with an average diameter of 1.67 cm (range, 1.2-3.3 cm). KD was more frequent (84% vs 56%; P = .0003) and larger (2.05 cm vs 1.61 cm; P < .0001) in left aSCA patients. When present, KD was more often symptomatic in left aSCA compared with right aSCA (77.4% vs 49.1%; P = .005). Dysphagia, chest pain, reflux, and asthma were all more common in left aSCA patients. KD was also more common in men (73.3% vs 50%; P < .0001) and larger in men (1.81 cm vs 1.54 cm; P < .0001) but with no difference in symptoms between sexes. Our proposed classification system based on aortic arch branching is as follows: type 1, left arch with right aSCA (59.9%); type 2, left arch with common carotid trunk and right aSCA (30.1%); type 3, right arch with left aSCA (9.6%); and type 4, right arch with common carotid trunk and left aSCA (0.3%). Subtypes describe the right vertebral artery (RVA) and left vertebral artery (LVA) origin: subclavian (s, RVA 90.1%, LVA 96.8%), carotid (c, RVA 9.6%, LVA 0.3%), or arch (a, RVA 0.3%, LVA 2.9%). Overall, 9.9% (31/312) had associated aortic pathology, although the study was underpowered to detect a difference between right aSCA and left aSCA (9.3% vs 16.1%; P = .213). Type 3 and type 4 arches more often have associated aortic pathology, KD, and symptoms. ConclusionsaSCAs are frequently symptomatic and commonly associated with aortic dissection and aneurysm. Our proposed classification scheme depicts all four aSCA arch variants and accounts for vertebral artery origin variation. These variants are common, and vertebral anatomy can differ greatly. Knowledge of these anatomic variations is critical to planning for endovascular and open repair of aortic arch pathology.

Outcome of fenestrated and Branched Endovascular Repair of Aortic Arch Pathology

Introduction: Operative management of aortic arch pathology remains a complex challenge and an area that poses significant obstacles to a totally endovascular approach. The aim of this study was to report the outcomes of custom-made fenestrated and branched endovascular aortic repair involving the arch (fEVARA and bEVARA) in our aortic center. Methods: All patients treated with fEVARA or bEVARA were reviewed. Indications for intervention, technical success, 30-day mortality and post-operative sequelae were examined. Results: Between May 2014 and February 2019, 24 patients underwent f/bEVARA. The mean age was 68 years (range 45-85); 9 were female. The median follow up was 16 months (range 1-59). The indications for intervention included degenerative aneurysm (n=11) and post dissection aneurysm (n=13). 4 patients had a connective tissue disorder and 11 had undergone previous open ascending aortic repair. 6 cases were part of further staged aortic intervention. Stent graft morphology included: 6 fenestrated grafts (Left Subclavian), 7 fenestration + scallop (Left Subclavian and Left Carotid artery), 1 scallop only (Left Subclavian); and 10 branched cases (Brachiocephalic, left Carotid and +/- Left Subclavian artery). The proximal landing was zone 0 (n=10), zone 1 (n=7) and zone 2 (n=7). 30-day mortality was 4% (n=1 retrograde type A dissection (RTAD) post discharge). Four non-disabling strokes and one non-fatal RTAD occurred within 30-days. Three of these patients had been treated with a fenestration and scallop combination, and both RTADs occurred in patients with fEVARA for chronic type B dissection. One additional late aortic death occurred (descending aortic rupture post-dissection aneurysm). One brachiocephalic trunk branch was relined 8 days post-op but target vessel patency remained 100%. Conclusion: f/bEVARA are feasible options for the management of aortic arch pathology with an acceptable short-term mortality. Cerebrovascular events are the main comorbidity. Peri-operative events were notably experienced in fEVARA, with grafts comprising a fenestration and scallop morphology, and also in chronic dissection cases. Disclosure: Nothing to disclose

AAN 3. Fenestrated and Branched Endovascular Repair of Aortic Arch Pathology

AAN 3. Fenestrated and Branched Endovascular Repair of Aortic Arch Pathology

Cerebral embolic protection during endovascular arch replacement.

Despite excellent results in high volume centers, open repair of aortic arch pathology is highly invasive, and can result in significant morbidity and mortality in high risk patients. Near-total and hybrid approaches to aortic arch disease states have emerged as an alternative for patients deemed moderate to high risk for conventional repair. Advantages of these approaches include avoidance of extracorporeal circulation and hypothermic circulatory arrest as well as avoidance of cross clamping, all of which are not well tolerated in high risk patients. Anatomically high-risk patients with anastomotic aneurysms from previous arch reconstruction may also benefit from these less invasive approaches. Medical devices designed specifically for the aortic arch are developing at a rapid pace and continue to evolve. Dedicated devices for zone 0-2 aortic arch repair are currently available under special access or being studied in clinical trials. Unfortunately, stroke continues to be the Achilles heel of endovascular approaches to the aortic arch, with cerebral embolism being the culprit in the majority of such cases. This perspective article describes the epidemiology, procedures, and mitigation strategies for current near-total and hybrid approaches to aortic arch pathology, and specifically addresses current means of embolic protection and future direction.

Endovascular arch replacement with a dual branched endoprosthesis.

In the light of current evidence, endovascular repair of aortic arch pathologies with custom-made devices should be considered a valid alternative to decrease operative mortality and morbidity associated with open or hybrid repair. Currently, two double inner branch devices are available on the market. Some papers from multicenter experiences have been published about the use of Cook device. We report our single-center experience with Bolton double branch stent graft in the treatment of aortic arch disease. Between 2013 and 2016, nine high-risk patients with arch pathology were treated in our center with a Bolton custom-made branched device. Among these, two with a single branch model were excluded, leaving a subgroup of seven patients of this study. Out of the seven male patients (mean age, 76; range, 70-85) included in the study, two (28%) died perioperatively after stroke (14%) and retrograde dissection (14%), respectively. No other death, major complications, including aneurysmal diameter evolution and branch related complications, or secondary intervention was recorded at a mean follow up of 24 [6-53] months. Despite the small sample size, our results are in line with the early experiences published on this technique. Endovascular repair of aortic arch disease with custom-made branched devices should always be considered to give high-risk patients a chance of repair.

Endovascular repair of aortic arch disease with double inner branched thoracic stent graft: the Bolton perspective.

In the light of current evidence, endovascular repair of aortic arch pathologies with custom-made devices should be considered a valid alternative to decrease operative mortality and morbidity associated with open or hybrid repair. Today, two double inner branch devices are available on market. We report our single-center experience with Bolton double branch stent graft in the treatment of aortic arch disease. Between 2013 and 2016, 15 high-risk patients with arch pathology were treated in our center with a custom-made branched device. Six of these received a Cook arch branched stent graft. Nine were treated with Bolton device. Among these, 2 with single branch model were excluded leaving a subgroup of 7 patients object of this study. Out of the 7 male patients (mean age 76, range 70-85) included in the study, 2 died in-hospital after stroke and retrograde dissection, respectively. No other death, major complication or secondary intervention was recorded at a mean follow-up of 24 (min-max 6-53) months, neither any aneurysmal diameter evolution nor branch related complications. Despite the small sample size, our results are in line with the early-published experiences about this technique. Endovascular repair of aortic arch disease with custom-made branched devices should always be considered to give high-risk patients a chance of repair.

Case series of aortic arch disease treated with branched stent-grafts.

Surgical repair of aortic arch pathology is complex and associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Alternative approaches have been developed to reduce these risks, including the use of thoracic stent-grafts with fenestrations or in combination with bypass procedures to maintain supra-aortic trunk blood flow. Branched stent-grafts are a novel approach to treat aortic arch pathology. Consecutive patients with aortic arch disease presenting to a single university hospital vascular centre were considered for branched stent-graft repair (October 2010 to January 2017). Patients were assessed in a multidisciplinary setting including a cardiologist, cardiac surgeon and vascular surgeon. All patients were considered prohibitively high risk for standard open surgical repair. The study used reporting standards for endovascular aortic repair and PROCESS (Preferred Reporting of Case Series in Surgery) guidelines. Some 30 patients (25 men) underwent attempted branch stent-graft repair. Mean age was 68 (range 37-84) years. Eighteen patients had chronic aortic dissection, 11 patients had an aneurysm and one had a penetrating ulcer. Fourteen patients had disease in aortic arch zone 0, six in zone 1 and ten in zone 2. Twenty-five patients had undergone previous aortic surgery and 24 required surgical revascularization of the left subclavian artery. Technical success was achieved in 27 of 30 patients. Four patients had an endoleak (type Ia, 1; type II, 3). The in-hospital mortality rate was three of 30. Mean length of follow-up was 12·0 (range 1·0-67·8) months, during which time 12 patients required an aortic-related reintervention. Repair of aortic arch pathology using branched stent-grafting appears feasible. Before widespread adoption of this technology, further studies are required to standardize the technique and identify which patients are most likely to benefit.

Total endovascular arch repair is the procedure of the future.

This study evaluates the current experience on endovascular repair of the aortic arch pathologies, the feasibility and safety of the procedure. A systematic review was performed. MEDLINE, CENTRAL, and Cochrane databases were searched with PRISMA methodology for published studies reporting on endovascular repair of aortic arch pathologies from 2000 to 2018. Thirteen non-randomized retrospective studies (either single or multicenter), two multicenter Registries and one multicenter non-randomized interventional study were included in the systematic review. The total number of patients who underwent total endovascular repair of the aortic arch pathology with either fenestrated, branched, or a combination of those devices or chimney technique was 952 patients (73%; 634/872 males, mean age ranging from 51 to 78 years). The technical success rate was 96.7% (921/952), while the 30-day mortality rate was 3.3% (32/952). The most common adverse events were endoleak type I (13.5%; 35/259), stroke (5.1%; 49/952), spinal cord ischemia (1.4%; 14/952) and retrograde dissection (1%; 8/952). During the follow-up period (mean ranging: 16.9 to 41.4 months; median ranging: 9 to 44.8 months) the total number of deaths was 31 (4.4%; 31/693). The total loss of supra-aortic vessel patency rate was 1.7% (14/803) and a re-intervention was needed in 50 patients (9%; 50/559; 11 open conversion). Endovascular repair of aortic arch pathologies is a feasible treatment option with good early and reasonable mid-term outcomes. This treatment modality approaches a level of maturity and may be considered as a solid alternative method of treatment.

Favourable Outcomes of Endovascular Total Aortic Arch Repair Via Needle Based In Situ Fenestration at a Mean Follow-Up of 5.4 Months

Endovascular repair of aortic arch pathologies remains challenging. Recently, needle based in situ fenestration (ISF) has shown great potential in endovascular total aortic arch repair (ETAAR). This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility, effectiveness, and safety of ETAAR via needle based ISF, and to present initial experience with this technique. Patients who met the inclusion criteria were enrolled in this prospective study. The supra-arch branches were manually punctured in a retrograde manner using liver biopsy needles (18 gauge/30cm) in the left common carotid artery (LCCA) and brachiocephalic trunk (BCT), and endo-puncture system or aspiration biopsy needles (21-gauge) in the left subclavian artery (LSA). All the branches were revascularised with bridge stents. Routine follow-up occurred at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months post surgery. Ten patients with arch pathologies underwent ETAAR. Revascularisation of three branches was successfully performed in eight patients, but attempts to create ISF in LSA were unsuccessful in two patients because of tortuosity and sharp angle. The time taken to establish ISF in LCCA and BCT was 100.4s and 489.6s, respectively. Bilateral regional cerebral oxygen saturation (RCOS) decreased after the arch endograft deployment (both, p<.001) and recovered to the pre-operative level once both carotid arteries were reconstructed (left, p=.0856; right, p=.6). The right RCOS was higher with the beneficial effect of extracorporeal circulation (after cTAGs deployment, p<.001; after LCCA revascularised, p=.0148) during the ischaemic period. In one case, the left iliac artery ruptured, but no ISF related or neurological complications occurred. An early follow-up (mean 5.44 months) CTA and ultrasound confirmed patency of all the branch grafts without any endoleak or migration CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that ETAAR via needle based ISF, making full use of off the shelf devices and techniques, can be successfully performed in aortic arch pathologies with a favourable early outcome.

Early- and Mid-term Results of the Chimney Technique in the Repair of Aortic Arch Pathologies.

To examine the safety, feasibility, and mid-term efficacy of the chimney technique for aortic arch pathologies. From February 2011 to December 2014, a total of 35 patients (30 men; mean age 54.3±14.1years) with aortic arch pathologies underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair combined with chimney stents. The indication was a proximal landing zone <1.5cm. Follow-up was performed at 3, 6, and 12months and then yearly thereafter. A total of 36 chimney stents were deployed (innominate artery, n=1; left common carotid artery, n=9; right subclavian artery, n=1; left subclavian artery, n=25). The technical success rate was 94.3% (33/35). Immediate type Ia endoleaks (ELIa) were observed in two patients (8.6%, 2/35). Twenty-five patients were successfully followed-up for a median period of 29.3months (range, 6-48months). One patient died due to aortic dissection aneurysm rupture at 36months (mortality rate of 4%, 1/25). Three late ELIa were observed and no reinterventions were performed. The overall incidence of ELIa was 20% (5/25). During follow-up, the patency rate for chimney stents was 92% (23/25). Our limited experience demonstrates that the chimney technique is a viable and relatively safe treatment for patients with challenging thoracic aortic pathologies at least in the mid-term follow-up period.

Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair of Aortic Arch Pathologies with the Conformable Thoracic Aortic Graft: Early and 2 year Results from a European Multicentre Registry

To assess safety, effectiveness and clinical outcome of the conformable thoracic aortic endograft (CTAG) in the treatment of aortic arch pathologies. Between October 2009 and December 2010, 100 consecutive patients (65 men; mean age 65 years) with aortic arch pathologies were treated with the CTAG device in five European centres. Indications were thoracic aortic aneurysm (n=57), Type B dissection (n=24), intramural haematoma (n=4), penetrating aortic ulcer (n=9), and traumatic transection (n=6). Emergency procedures were performed in 33%. The proximal landing zone (LZ) was LZ 0 in 7%, LZ 1 in14%, LZ 2 in 43%, and LZ 3 in 36%. Data were collected prospectively and analysed for technical and clinical success. Conformability and deployment accuracy were analysed on intra-operative angiography and post-operative computed tomography. Mean follow up was 24±19 months (range, 0.3-36 months). The 30 day, 1 and 2 year survival rates were 90%, 81%, and 74% respectively. The 2 year survival was 80% in the elective and 62% in the emergency groups (p=.20). The major 30 day complication rate was 34%: primary Type Ia endoleak affected 1%, retrograde dissection in 1%, and the paraplegia and stroke rates at 30 days were 4% and 11%. Age > 70 years was an independent predictor for mortality and complications. The primary technical success rate was 92%; device deployment was successful in 100% and accurate in 99%. Conformability to the aortic arch was achieved in 95%. The CTAG stent graft shows high deployment accuracy, good conformability, and clinical effectiveness in the treatment of aortic arch pathologies. However, thoracic endovascular aortic repair in the arch is associated with a relatively high stroke rate. Further studies with more patients and longer follow up are needed to evaluate the long-term results.