Wednesday 10 August – Scientific Session 9/1130–1145 Evolution in the Techniques andOutcomes of Aortic Arch Surgery: A 22 Year Single Centre Experience Reece A. Davies 2,4,∗, Deborah Black2, Richmond W. Jeremy2,3, Paul G. Bannon1,2,4, Matthew S. Bayfield1,4, P. Nicholas Hendel 1,2,4, Clifford F. Hughes1,2,4, Michael K. Wilson1,4, Michael P. Vallely 1,2,4 1 Cardiothoracic Surgical Unit, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia 2 Faculty of Medicine, The University of Sydney, Australia 3 Department of Cardiology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia 4 The Baird Institute for Heart and Lung Surgical Research, Sydney, Australia Introduction: Aortic arch replacement is a complicated and high risk procedure used mainly in the treatment of aneurysms and dissections of the aortic arch. There have been many advances over recent years [1,2]. Published mortality rates in modern series vary between 6 and 16% [1,3]. We review the changes in our unit’s techniques and outcomes and attempt to identify predictors of an adverse outcome over the past 22 years. Methods: Data were collated from databases and medical records for all patients who underwent aortic arch replacement surgery from January 1989 toDecember 2010. T ( t t m