Reorganization Of Healthcare System Research Articles

The impact of COVID-19 on heart failure admissions in Suriname-A call for action

IntroductionDuring the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, there was a worldwide reorganization of healthcare systems focusing on limiting the spread of the virus. The impact of these measures on heart failure (HF) admissions is scarcely reported in Low and Middle Income Countries (LMICs) including Suriname. We therefore assessed HF hospitalizations before and during the pandemic and call for action to improve healthcare access in Suriname through the development and implementation of telehealth strategies. MethodsRetrospectively collected clinical (# hospitalizations per patient, in hospital mortality, comorbidities) and demographic (sex, age, ethnicity) data of people hospitalized with a primary or secondary HF discharge ICD10 code in the Academic Hospital Paramaribo (AZP) from February to December 2019 (pre-pandemic) and February to December 2020 (during the pandemic) were used for analysis. Data are presented as frequencies with corresponding percentages. T-tests were used to analyze continuous variables and the two-sample test for proportions for categorical variables. ResultsThere was an overall slight decrease of 9.1% HF admissions (N pre-pandemic:417 vs N during the pandemic: 383). Significantly less patients (18.3%, p-value<0.00) were hospitalized during the pandemic (N: 249 (65.0%)) compared to pre-pandemic (N: 348 (83.3%)), while readmissions increased statistically significantly for both readmissions within 90 days (75 (19.6%) vs 55 (13.2%), p-value = 0.01) and readmissions within 365 days (122 (31.9%) vs 70 (16.7%), p-value = 0.00) in 2020 compared to 2019. Patients admitted during the pandemic also had significantly more of the following comorbidities: hypertension (46.2% vs 30.6%, p-value = 0.00), diabetes (31.9% vs 24.9%, p-value = 0.03) anemia (12.8% vs 3.1%, p-value = 0.00), and atrial fibrillation (22.7% vs 15.1%, p-value = 0.00). ConclusionHF admissions were reduced during the pandemic while HF readmissions increased compared to the pre-pandemic period. Due to in-person consultation restrictions, the HF clinic was inactive during the pandemic period. Distance monitoring of HF patients via telehealth tools could help in reducing these adverse effects. This call for action identifies key elements (digital and health literacy, telehealth legislation, integration of telehealth tools within the current healthcare sector) needed for the successful development and implementation of these tools in LMICs.

The first wave of COVID-19 and mental distress of physician residents in Brazil: a comparison between two cohorts

IntroductionThe reorganization of healthcare systems to face the COVID-19 pandemic has led to concerns regarding psychological distress of healthcare workers, and training requirements of physician residents.ObjectiveTo assess the influence of COVID-19 pandemic on depression, anxiety, burnout and training schedules of residents.MethodsTwo independent cross-sectional studies (the first in November 2019 [control], the second in June 2020, during the first wave of COVID-19 pandemic) enrolling physician residents from Brazil, using online surveys. In each of them, we collected demographic and training program data, and assessed depression, anxiety and burnout through PHQ-2, GAD-2 and MBI (2-item version) scales, respectively. We controlled confounding variables with logistic regression analysis.ResultsThe COVID-19 cohort (n = 524) presented a briefer workload and had at least 1 day off per week more frequently, in relation to the control cohort (n = 1 419). The majority of residents (464/524, 89.5%) had a reduction in their duty hours, and believed they would need an extra training period after the end of the pandemic (399/524, 76.2%). The frequency of depression increased (46.0% vs. 58.8%, aOR = 1.64, 95% CI = 1.32–2.05), anxiety did not change (56.5% vs. 56.5%, aOR = 1.24, 95% CI = 0.99–1.55) and burnout decreased (37.0% vs. 26.1%, aOR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.60–0.99). Sensitivity analysis did not change these results.ConclusionMental distress is frequent among residents and associated with both training program and social environments. The consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic on training requirements should be specifically addressed by supervisors and policymakers, in a case-by-case basis. Psychological support must be provided to healthcare workers.

The effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on pediatric physiatric health care in Croatia among children with neurological risk: A retrospective study.

Since the start of COVID pandemic, the Croatian government issued many recommendations and guidelines, imposed reorganization of health care system, and ordered two lock-downs to mitigate the spread of the disease. All of this may have had an unwanted effect on the standard of health care for non-COVID-19 patients, including children with neurological risk factors. To highlight the possibility that measures taken to mitigate the COVID-19 pandemic may lead to a substantial delay of examination by physical medicine specialists and timely rehabilitation programs for children with neurological risks. A retrospective medical history-based study between 2020 and 2021. The study was performed in Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine at the University Hospital Centre of Split, Croatia. Children with neurological risk examined by pediatric physical rehabilitation specialists in the Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine between January 2017 and December 2021. Case records of patients were reviewed, dividing them into groups according to severity of neurological risk and their age at the time of first examination. We also noted in what months of the year those examinations were performed. The outcome was change in the number of the first examinations and the age of the patients when the examination was first performed. During the pandemic year 2020, the total number of first examinations was lower by 244 (38%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 34%-42%), and the number of first examinations of children with neurological risks was lower by 216 (36%; 95% CI: 33%-40%).On the contrary, in 2021, there was an increase in the total number of first examinations by 114 (18%; 95% CI: 15%-21%) and first examinations of children with neurological risks compared to the pre-pandemic years by 97 (16%; 95% CI: 13%-20%). Furthermore, the division of patients according to age at the time of first examination significantly differed in the pre-pandemic and pandemic 2021 periods (λ =11.8; p=.018). The greatest contributing factor to this difference was the group of patients older than 12 months. The study suggests that the chaotic initial stages of the COVID-19 pandemic during 2020 caused delay in examinations by physical medicine specialists for children with neurological risks that could potentially affect neurodevelopmental outcomes.

From COVID-19 Pandemic to Patient Safety: A New "Spring" for Telemedicine or a Boomerang Effect?

During the Covid-19 health emergency, telemedicine was an essential asset through which health systems strengthened their response during the critical phase of the pandemic. According to the post-pandemic economic reform plans of many countries, telemedicine will not be limited to a tool for responding to an emergency condition but it will become a structural resource that will contribute to the reorganization of Healthcare Systems and enable the transfer of part of health care from the hospital to the home-based care. However, scientific evidences have shown that health care delivered through telemedicine can be burdened by numerous ethical and legal issues. Although there is an emerging discussion on patient safety issues related to the use of telemedicine, there is a lack of reseraches specifically designed to investigate patient safety. On the contrary, it would be necessary to determine standards and specific application rules in order to ensure safety. This paper examines the telemedicine-risk profiles and proposes a position statement for clinical risk management to support continuous improvement in the safety of health care delivered through telemedicine.

P-231 Impact of COVID-19 on colorectal cancer management: Single-center experience

Colorectal cancer (CCR) is the third most common and the second most deadly cancer with 1.9 million new diagnoses worldwide in 2020. COVID-19 pandemic placed an unprecedented burden on health systems worldwide, directly impacting cancer patients’ management. Health-care systems reorganization led to a decrease on all non-urgent surgical and medical procedures, delaying cancer screening protocols. This study aims to access the impact of COVID-19 on Colorectal Cancer management in a Portuguese Oncology Department.

საზოგადოებრივი ჯანდაცვის განვითარების პირველი ნაბიჯები დამოუკიდებელ საქართველოში

Reorganization of healthcare system in Georgia was based on the development of public health, aiming to activate of preventive medicine and operate efficient tools of epidemiological surveillance. This paper seeks to explore the attitudes and values which underlie public health reform in Georgia, and to investigate the goals of reform and the strategies designed to achieve them. The article is based on a documentary analysis, which included official documents and non-official journal publications. Georgia was the only country (except the Baltic states) to abandon the soviet system of Sanitary-Epidemiological Service, completely reorganizing it and establishing a new public health infrastructure, built on European principles. The reorganization of the Sanitary-Epidemiological Service implied the separation of supervisory (sanitary control) and executive functions, typical of the Soviet system. As a result, the Public Health Department and the Department for Sanitary Supervision and Hygienic Regulation were established. In terms of decentralization, the funds out of four elements of healthcare system (financing, Policy Development, Standard definition, Management and Administration) were distributed at central, regional and municipal levels. The role of public health is especially increasing in the modern globalized world, when the epidemics of infectious diseases have become topical. In globalized world, the public health challenges go beyond national borders and interests, having huge global political and economic consequences. Therefore, modern public healthcare is reviewed in a global context and requires international regulations, transnational actions and solutions based on coordinated cooperation among different countries of the world. Keywords: Public health, health care reforms, prevention, healthy lifestyle. JEL Codes: H51, H75, I18

Heat-related mortality amplified during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Excess mortality not directly related to the virus has been shown to have increased during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, changes in heat-related mortality during the pandemic have not been addressed in detail. Here, we performed an observational study crossing daily mortality data collected in Portugal (SICO/DGS) with high-resolution temperature series (ERA5/ECMWF), characterizing their relation in the pre-pandemic, and how it aggravated during 2020. The combined result of COVID-19 and extreme temperatures caused the largest annual mortality burden in recent decades (~ 12 000 excess deaths [~ 11% above baseline]). COVID-19 caused the largest fraction of excess mortality during March to May (62%) and from October onwards (85%). During summer, its direct impact was residual, and deaths not reported as COVID-19 dominated excess mortality (553 versus 3 968). A prolonged hot spell led mortality to the upper tertile, reaching its peak in mid-July (+ 45% deaths/day). The lethality ratio (+ 14 deaths per cumulated ºC) was higher than that observed in recent heatwaves. We used a statistical model to estimate expected deaths due to cold/heat, indicating an amplification of at least 50% in heat-related deaths during 2020 compared to pre-pandemic years. Our findings suggest mortality during 2020 has been indirectly amplified by the COVID-19 pandemic, due to the disruption of healthcare systems and fear of population in attending healthcare facilities (expressed in emergency room admissions decreases). While lockdown measures and healthcare systems reorganization prevented deaths directly related to the virus, a significant burden due to other causes represents a strong secondary impact. This was particularly relevant during summer hot spells, when the lethality ratio reached magnitudes not experienced since the 2003 heatwaves. This severe amplification of heat-related mortality during 2020 stresses the need to resume normal healthcare services and public health awareness.Supplementary InformationThe online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00484-021-02192-z.

The real-word impact of breast and colorectal cancer surgery during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.

The postponing of screening and the health care system reorganization, due to the Covid-19 pandemic and lockdown, could led to a concerning decline in breast and colorectal cancer diagnoses. This monocentric retrospective analysis has compared the pre-Covid period (March 2019 to March 2020) to the Covid period (April 2020 to April 2021) in terms of screening programs, clinical, surgical and pathological. A total of 799 patients diagnosed with Breast Cancer (BC) and Colorectal Cancer (CRC) underwent surgery during the two periods. In FVG in 2020 a decrease in mammography screening of 17.1% has been registered compared to 2019; this reduction has been higher for CRC screening, which summed up to 24.5%. As far as BC is concerned, screening-detected tumours rose significantly from 18 to 28%, mastectomies decreased from 40 to 31% and advanced tumours treated surgically decreased from 12 to 6%. Concerning CRC, a significant increase in admissions through the Emergency Department has been registered in spite of a stable percentage of urgent surgery performed, proving that severely symptomatic patients have been treated adequately. Open surgery has significantly decreased, whereas the tumoral stage and complications have remained constant in the two periods. This study has proved that maintaining standards of care and validated protocols during emergency is the most adequate and winning strategy: impact on BC and CRC has been less important than expected. These results support the recommendations for immediate and rapid screening program resumption at operating speed, using prioritization strategies to make up for the diagnostic delays.

Increased Prevalence of Neuropsychiatric Disorders during COVID-19 Pandemic in People Needing a Non-Deferrable Neurological Evaluation.

Background: The novel coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak provoked a profound healthcare system reorganization. This study aimed to compare the reasons for requesting a non-deferrable neurological evaluation before the COVID-19 pandemic and during the lockdown. Methods: Retrospective observational study including non-deferrable neurological outpatients before the pandemic (pre-COVID-19 group, n = 223) and during the Italian second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic (LOCKDOWN group, n = 318). Results: The number of patients sent for cerebrovascular disorders, headache, and vertigo significantly dropped between the pre-COVID-19 era and the lockdown period. While in the pre-COVID-19 group, the most frequent diagnosis was cerebrovascular disorder; neuropsychiatric disorders ranked first in the LOCKDOWN group. Moreover, the percentage of appropriate non-deferrable neurological evaluations significantly increased in the LOCKDOWN group compared with the pre-COVID-19 group. Discussion: Our study shows a significant increase of neuropsychiatric disorders in non-deferrable neurologic evaluations during the Italian second wave of the COVID-19. Overall, cases were more severe and required a more complex management during the lockdown compared with the pre-COVID era. These findings confirm that a careful approach to prevent the psychological consequences of the pandemic is needed, and long-term rearrangements of the healthcare system are desirable to guarantee appropriate management.

Correct use of telemedicine in gastroenterology, hepatology, and endoscopy during and after the COVID-19 pandemic: Recommendations from the Italian association of hospital gastroenterologists and endoscopists (AIGO)

The purpose of the present document is to provide detailed information on the correct and optimal use of digital media to ensure continuity of care for gastroenterological patients in everyday clinical practice, in health emergencies and/or when the patient cannot reach the hospital for other reasons.During the recent COVID-19 pandemic, telemedicine has allowed many patients with chronic diseases to access remote care worldwide, proving to be the ideal solution to overcome restrictions and carry out non-urgent routine follow-ups on chronic patients. The COVID-19 pandemic has therefore made organizational and cultural renewal essential for the reorganization of healthcare in order to ensure greater continuity of care with a minimum risk of spreading the virus to users, practitioners and their families.These AIGO recommendations are intended to provide Italian gastroenterologists with a tool to use this method appropriately, in compliance with current legislation, in particular the proper approach and procedures for conducting a remote examination using a video conferencing tool, the so-called televisit.In the near future, telemedicine may contribute to a possible reorganization of healthcare systems, through innovative care models focusing on the citizen and facilitating access to services throughout the entire Country.

COVID-19 and cancer: How outpatients (pts) and their caregivers (CGs) face to the pandemic—A survey from the midst of the Italian outbreak.

e24119 Background: COVID-19 pandemic led to a reorganization of Health Care System for cancer pts, also because of the application of containment measures. The aim of our study was to investigate the emotional discomfort of pts and their CGs who needed to access the day-hospital to receive treatment during pandemic. Methods: This is a single-institution, prospective, cross-sectional study. From 5th May to 5th June 2020 a survey was conducted at a Department of Oncology in the midst of the Italian outbreak. We compared the points of view of both the “players” through 2 different multiple-choice questionnaires enquiring demographic characteristics, changes in emotional status, interpersonal relationships with health professionals (HCPs) and self-perception of treatment outcomes. Results: 625 pts and 254 CGs were enrolled. Female were prevalent (pts:65%, CGs:56%). Pts were generally older than CGs (pts:70% &gt; 60 y, CGs:50.4% 41-60 y; p &lt; 0.001). 50.5% pts had a low education level (EL) while 67.5% CGs had a higher degree. About half of pts (52.8%) reached the hospital with their own CG who lived together in the 58.3% of cases. 52.5% of pts felt more vulnerable to COVID-19 compared to CGs. Differently, CGs did not feel more exposed to infection, although they were involved in taking care or lived together with pts. The EL influenced the risk contagion perception: people with a lower EL were less worried about being infected with SARS-CoV-2. Regardless of the perceived contagion risk, study participants considered the containment measures a valid support to avoid the spread of infection (pts:92%, CGs:89%; p = 0.163) without an excessive loss of time (pts:78%, CGs:88.6%; p = 0.003). A personal emotional change caused by waiting and performing visits/treatments alone was reported more by CGs (66%) than by pts (32.7%; p &lt; 0.001). Specifically, CGs had greater anxiety (58.8%) and fear of not properly managing pts at home (19.8%). The majority of pts (73%) and CGs (62%) thought that the pandemic didn’t influence treatment outcomes. The relationship with HCPs was not negatively affected for both pts (79.6%) and CGs (95%), but about a quarter of pts (25%) and CGs (29%) thought that the attention of HCPs was more focused on COVID-19 than on cancer treatment. Conclusions: The majority of pts felt at higher risk of COVID-19 infection and therefore approved the application of safety standards to help them feel more protected. Good relationships with HCPs contributed to receive treatments without experiencing additional distress. For CGs the main troubles are limitations which don’t allow to fully share the pts' care route and the perceive an impairment in HCPs relationship. Starting from these data, we can better understand the current psychological distress of pts and their families in order to develop potential strategies to support them in this strenuous period of crisis.

Acute coronary syndrome in COVID-19 times: could it be business as usual?

Funding AcknowledgementsType of funding sources: None.BackgroundIn an attempt to cope with the COVID-19 pandemic, several measures of social distancing and reorganization of health care systems have been adopted. In Portugal, these included suspending elective clinical activity and a temporary national lockdown. Data from multiple centres, including central hospitals in Portugal, has shown a reduction in hospital admissions for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) during the COVID-19 outbreak. Fear of going to the hospital and physical inactivity have been pointed as possible explanations.Purposeto assess the impact of this pandemic and the measures taken against it on the pattern of admissions and treatment of patients with ACS in a district hospital. MethodsA single-centre retrospective study was conducted in the Cardiology Department of a Portuguese district hospital, capable of performing 24h percutaneous coronary intervention. We analyzed the admissions for ACS during the peak of the first COVID-19 outbreak in Portugal (16th of March to 3rd of May 2020, coinciding with the suspension of elective activity) and compared it with two control periods: one immediately preceding the study period (27th of January to 15th of March - 2020 control) and one exactly one year before (16th of March to 3rd of May 2019 - 2019 control).ResultsDuring the 7 weeks of the first COVID-19 outbreak, 46 patients were hospitalized for ACS in our department, while 54 had been admitted during the 2020 control period and 40 in the 2019 control period, with a mean of 7 admissions/week (vs 8 and 6, respectively; p > 0.05). There were no significant differences between the study group and both controls regarding basal characteristics. Their presentation did not differ: the majority of patients (57%) was admitted for ST-elevation myocardial infarction and median time from symptom onset to admission to the emergency room was 3 hours, with 4% of patients presenting in Killip class ≥III (p > 0.05 for all). We also found no significant differences in the treatment administered nor in the outcomes (96% submitted to coronary angiography, median length of hospitalization of 4 days and in-hospital mortality rate of 2%, p > 0.05 for all). ConclusionsOur study suggests that the reduction in admissions for ACS during the COVID-19 outbreak is not universal. Additionally, severity at presentation, treatment administered and outcomes did not seem to differ. The relatively low prevalence of COVID-19 in our hospital"s region might be the cause, since people might fear and refrain less from going to the hospital. Larger studies with other centres in low-prevalence regions are needed to confirm this hypothesis.

De-escalating cancer treatments during COVID 19 pandemic: Is metronomic chemotherapy a reasonable option?

COVID 19 pandemic represents an emergency for public health services and containment measures to reduce the risk of infection have been promptly activated worldwide. The healthcare systems reorganization has had a major impact on the management of cancer patients who are considered at high risk of infection. Recommendations and guidelines on how to manage cancer patients during COVID 19 pandemic have been published. Oral administration of chemotherapy is recommended to limit the access of cancer patients to hospital facilities and in some cases to guarantee the continuum of care. Low-dose metronomic administration of chemotherapy with different drugs and schedules has emerged in the last years as a possible alternative to conventional chemotherapy, due to its promising tumor control rates and excellent safety profiles. Moreover, given that many metronomic schedules use the oral route administration, it could represent a therapeutic strategy to ensure continuum of cancer care during COVID 19 pandemic. In this review we have selected all the clinical studies that have used the metronomic strategy, especially with oral drugs, in order to identify the subgroups of cancer patients who can benefit most from a metronomic approach even during COVID 19 pandemic.

Acute stroke treatment during coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has caused a major impact on stroke care. This review synthesizes the available data and provides a framework for optimal management of stroke patients with confirmed or suspected COVID-19 infection and eligible to reperfusion treatments. Reorganization of health services has led to the conversion of stroke units and relocation of stroke staff to COVID units. During the pandemic surge, there has been a general decline of stroke presentations, increased time delays, and reduced activity across all areas of stroke care, specifically the delivery of acute treatment. Moreover, COVID-19 patients seem to have a worse outcome despite prompt recanalization. Periprocedural monitoring studies are needed in these patients to target a more adequate therapy. The COVID-19 pandemic has jeopardized the ability of stroke centers to provide timely assessment and acute therapies such as reperfusive treatments. Yet, as stroke remains a medical emergency, efforts to maintain stroke teams and safe provision of highly effective stroke treatments should be prioritized despite healthcare systems reorganization. This can be accomplished through the activation of telestroke networks, protected stroke pathways, 24/7 open-access high-quality stroke centers, and stroke awareness programs.

Professional and Psychological Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Oncology Residents: A National Survey.

PURPOSEThe COVID-19 pandemic has severely affected clinical practice in oncology, leading to organizational, ethical, and medical issues. In particular, it has raised challenges in the context of competing care priorities between COVID-19 and cancer treatment. Residents on the front line face difficulties related to increasing care needs and urgent reorganization of health care systems while managing psychological stress and uncertainty. We aimed to evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on oncology residents.METHODS AND MATERIALSWe conducted a national survey (39 questions) in France among oncology and radiation therapy residents to determine the psychological impact and professional difficulties (eg, reassignment, training/research time, supervision, teleworking, management of patients) associated with the first peak of the COVID-19 pandemic.RESULTSOverall, 222 residents (medical oncologists, 61%; radiation therapists, 39%) participated in our survey, representing approximately one third of all residents and fellows in France. One third of respondents had been reassigned to a COVID-19 ward. Training and research activity decreased for 89% and 41% of respondents, respectively. Two thirds (70%) of respondents declared that they had faced ethical issues, 35% felt worried about their own health, and 23% experienced psychological distress. According to the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, 32% were anxious and 17% depressed. Consumption of tobacco, psychostimulants, and alcohol increased in 31%, 24%, and 29% of respondents, respectively.CONCLUSIONFrench oncology residents were highly affected by the first peak of the COVID-19 pandemic in terms of professional activity and psychological impact. This national survey can be used as a basis for improved management, medical reorganization, and training of residents during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic.

Attitudes of patients with relapsing-remitting form of multiple sclerosis using disease-modifying drugs in Montenegro regarding COVID-19 pandemic

BackgroundIn the days of the reorganization of healthcare systems due to SARS-Cov2 pandemic, patients suffering from chronic diseases are being often neglected. The aim of our study was to examine the attitudes and behaviors of patient suffering from relapsing-remitting form of multiple sclerosis using disease-modifying drugs in Montenegro in relation to the current pandemic. MethodsThe research was conducted through an online-generated questionnaire during the peak of the pandemic. ResultsThere is a high level of concern about COVID-19 (3.22±1.23), especially about safety behavior intensification (3.80±1.29). Possibility of relapse during pandemic was considered as moderate (2.06±1.42), but relapse symptoms would be reported by the majority of subjects (1.55±1.23). Our unemployed patients statistically more often reported that they had more frequent mood changes, but also that they felt more energy loss. Surprisingly, there was no difference among the subjects according to smoking status. According therapy groups there was significant difference between the groups regarding some variables: patients using ocrelizumab are most concerned about COVID-19; patients using interferon beta 1a i.m. statistically more often have frequent changes in their mood, memory problems, poor appetite, feeling of nausea or upset stomach and patients on fingolimod have bigger afraid of coming to regular visits. ConclusionOur patients showed concern about their disease future status in the current epidemic era, but also showed a high degree of trust in physicians and the overall health system.

The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Cardiovascular Fellows-in-Training: A National Survey

The coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has prompted a dramatic reorganization of health care systems and medical training programs across the United States. At many hospitals, cardiovascular fellows-in-training (FITs) provide front-line clinical care. The traditional cardiovascular

COVID-19 and the Global Impact on Colorectal Practice and Surgery

BackgroundThe novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 virus that emerged in December 2019 causing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has led to the sudden national reorganization of health care systems and changes in the delivery of health care globally. The purpose of our study was to use a survey to assess the global effects of COVID-19 on colorectal practice and surgery. Materials and MethodsA panel of International Society of University Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ISUCRS) selected 22 questions, which were included in the questionnaire. The questionnaire was distributed electronically to ISUCRS fellows and other surgeons included in the ISUCRS database and was advertised on social media sites. The questionnaire remained open from April 16 to 28, 2020. ResultsA total of 287 surgeons completed the survey. Of the 287 respondents, 90% were colorectal specialists or general surgeons with an interest in colorectal disease. COVID-19 had affected the practice of 96% of the surgeons, and 52% were now using telemedicine. Also, 66% reported that elective colorectal cancer surgery could proceed but with perioperative precautions. Of the 287 respondents, 19.5% reported that the use of personal protective equipment was the most important perioperative precaution. However, personal protective equipment was only provided by 9.1% of hospitals. In addition, 64% of surgeons were offering minimally invasive surgery. However, 44% reported that enough information was not available regarding the safety of the loss of intra-abdominal carbon dioxide gas during the COVID-19 pandemic. Finally, 61% of the surgeons were prepared to defer elective colorectal cancer surgery, with 29% willing to defer for ≤ 8 weeks. ConclusionThe results from our survey have demonstrated that, globally, COVID-19 has affected the ability of colorectal surgeons to offer care to their patients. We have also discussed suggestions for various practical adaptation strategies for use during the recovery period.

Health care of the Baltic countries

The Baltic countries have always occupied a separate position among other Soviet republics, differing from them not only in language, but also in their worldview, cultural values, mentality and religion. After the collapse of the Soviet Union the reform of the healthcare system in these three states (Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania) took place according to a similar scenario — from a centralized health care system to insurance medicine, but at the same time it had a number of peculiarities. We can consider health care system of Estonia, a small state with a population of only 1.3 million people, as the best model showing results of the health care system reorganization.

The Overarching Themes From the CLER National Report of Findings 2018.

The Overarching Themes From the CLER National Report of Findings 2018.